华硕 FX502VM-AS73 笔记本电脑简短评测

Name: Asus FX502VM-AS73
Brand: Asus

专注游戏。 FX502VM，在不太影响性能的情况下，实现了GL502VM几乎所有的功能。然而，该机带有最低端TN显示屏。对比度非常差。

Allen Ngo (translated by Kangfei Zheng), Published 03/13/2017 🇺🇸 🇷🇺 ...

Gaming Geforce Windows Kaby Lake

Test device courtesy of CUKUSA.com

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Asus FX502VM-AS73 (FX Series)

Processor

Intel Core i7-7700HQ 4 x 2.8 - 3.8 GHz, Kaby Lake

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile - 3 GB VRAM, Core: 1404 MHz, RAM: 8008 MHz, GDDR5, 373.19

Memory

16 GB

, DDR4, 8 GB gelötet, 8 GB SODIMM, dual-channel, 17-17-17-39

Display

15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, TN LED, ID: BOE069C, Name: BOE NT156FHM-N41, glossy: no

Mainboard

Intel HM175

Storage

SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A, 256 GB

, Sekundäre: Toshiba MQ01ABD100

Connections

3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5 毫米耳麦合一, Card Reader: SD Speicherkartenleser

Networking

Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.0

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 23 x 390 x 266

Battery

64 Wh Lithium-Polymer, 4颗

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 高清

Additional features

Speakers: 立体声, Keyboard: 巧克力键盘, Keyboard Light: yes, MyAsus, Asus Giftbox, McAfee, 12 Months Warranty

Weight

2.57 kg, Power Supply: 660 g

Price

1250 USD

Links

Asus homepage
Asus notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

▶ load Youtube video

MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 Alienware 15 R3 Gigabyte P55W v7 Asus Strix GL502VM-DS74 Asus FX502VM-AS73 Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) DIN A4 ❌

Right: 3.5 mm combo audio, 2x USB 3.0, SD reader, Kensington Lock

Left: AC adapter, Gigabit RJ-45, mDP, HDMI, USB 3.0

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell XPS 15-9550 i7	121 MB/s +54%
Asus Strix GL502VM-DS74	80.3 MB/s +2%
Asus FX502VM-AS73	78.8 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell XPS 15-9550 i7	211 MB/s +143%
Asus Strix GL502VM-DS74	89.5 MB/s +3%
Asus FX502VM-AS73	86.9 MB/s

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Alienware 15 R3 Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter	560 MBit/s +9%
Asus FX502VM-AS73 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	513 MBit/s
Asus Strix GL502VM-DS74 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	468 MBit/s -9%
iperf3 receive AX12
Alienware 15 R3 Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter	681 MBit/s +26%
Asus FX502VM-AS73 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	541 MBit/s
Asus Strix GL502VM-DS74 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	331 MBit/s -39%


206.8 cd/m²	206.5 cd/m²	203.4 cd/m²
200.3 cd/m²	209.5 cd/m²	207.6 cd/m²
196.2 cd/m²	214.2 cd/m²	200.5 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2

Maximum: 214.2 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 205 cd/m² Minimum: 22.01 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 209.5 cd/m²
Contrast: 304:1 (Black: 0.69 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 1.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
56.6% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
36.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
39.47% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
56.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
38.28% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.23

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2)

	Asus FX502VM-AS73 TN LED, 15.6", 1920x1080	Alienware 15 R3 HPJGK_B156HTN (AUO51ED), TN, 15.6", 1920x1080	MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F), IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080	Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) Sharp SHP1453 LQ156M1, LED IGZO IPS InfinityEdge, 15.6", 1920x1080	Gigabyte P55W v7 LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F), IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080	Asus Strix GL502VM-DS74 IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080
Display		66%	56%	78%	54%	58%
Display P3 Coverage	38.28	66 72%	63.9 67%	68.9 80%	63.5 66%	64.8 69%
sRGB Coverage	56.9	90.5 59%	83.1 46%	98.9 74%	82 44%	84.9 49%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	39.47	66.2 68%	60.8 54%	70.9 80%	59.9 52%	62 57%
Response Times		29%	-21%	-112%	-21%	-47%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	28.4 ?(11.2, 17.2)	25 ?(12, 13) 12%	37 ?(16, 21) -30%	54 ?(33.2, 20) -90%	37 ?(15, 22) -30%	42 ?(19.2, 22.8) -48%
Response Time Black / White *	22.4 ?(6, 16.4)	12 ?(4, 8) 46%	25 ?(4, 21) -12%	52.4 ?(33.2, 19.2) -134%	25 ?(5, 20) -12%	32.8 ?(6, 26.8) -46%
PWM Frequency
Screen		-6%	41%	54%	39%	44%
Brightness middle	209.5	386 84%	310 48%	400 91%	287 37%	307.8 47%
Brightness	205	382 86%	311 52%	392 91%	289 41%	301 47%
Brightness Distribution	92	93 1%	85 -8%	89 -3%	87 -5%	88 -4%
Black Level *	0.69	0.39 43%	0.3 57%	0.26 62%	0.29 58%	0.33 52%
Contrast	304	990 226%	1033 240%	1538 406%	990 226%	933 207%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.7	10.2 -117%	4.82 -3%	4.9 -4%	4.92 -5%	4.5 4%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	19.7	15.81 20%	10.14 49%	11 44%	11 44%	10 49%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.8	11.28 -527%	3.94 -119%	7.2 -300%	3.66 -103%	2.9 -61%
Gamma	2.23 ^99%	2.23 ^99%	2.45 ^90%	2.11 ^104%	2.32 ^95%	2.22 ^99%
CCT	6975 ^93%	11383 ^57%	6877 ^95%	6911 ^94%	6482 ^100%	1136 ^572%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	36.2	59 63%	54 49%	64.2 77%	54 49%	55.4 53%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	56.6	90 59%	83 47%	98.9 75%	82 45%	84.8 50%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		30% / 13%	25% / 36%	7% / 37%	24% / 34%	18% / 35%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
22.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 6 ms rise
22.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 16.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 46 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
28.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 11.2 ms rise
28.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 17.2 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 34 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5 | Cinebench R10 | wPrime 2.10

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus G701VIK-BA049T Intel Core i7-7820HK	184 Points +31%
Eurocom Sky X7E2 Intel Core i7-6700K	160 Points +14%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.7 GHz, 455) Intel Core i7-6820HQ	154 Points +10%
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) Intel Core i5-7300HQ	146 Points +4%
MSI GE62 2QC-468XPL Intel Core i7-5700HQ	144 Points +3%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	140 Points 0%
Asus FX502VM-AS73 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	140 Points
Toshiba Satellite S70-B-106 Intel Core i7-4700HQ	131 Points -6%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus G701VIK-BA049T Intel Core i7-7820HK	899 Points +24%
Eurocom Sky X7E2 Intel Core i7-6700K	874 Points +21%
Asus FX502VM-AS73 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	725 Points
MSI GE62 2QC-468XPL Intel Core i7-5700HQ	719 Points -1%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.7 GHz, 455) Intel Core i7-6820HQ	704 Points -3%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	676 Points -7%
Toshiba Satellite S70-B-106 Intel Core i7-4700HQ	566 Points -22%
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) Intel Core i5-7300HQ	508 Points -30%

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus G701VIK-BA049T Intel Core i7-7820HK	2.08 Points +25%
Eurocom Sky X7E2 Intel Core i7-6700K	1.72 Points +3%
MSI GE62 2QC-468XPL Intel Core i7-5700HQ	1.68 Points +1%
Asus FX502VM-AS73 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	1.67 Points
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	1.55 Points -7%
Toshiba Satellite S70-B-106 Intel Core i7-4700HQ	1.49 Points -11%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus G701VIK-BA049T Intel Core i7-7820HK	9.91 Points +24%
Eurocom Sky X7E2 Intel Core i7-6700K	8.55 Points +7%
Asus FX502VM-AS73 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	7.99 Points
MSI GE62 2QC-468XPL Intel Core i7-5700HQ	7.96 Points 0%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	7.39 Points -8%
Toshiba Satellite S70-B-106 Intel Core i7-4700HQ	6.02 Points -25%

Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Eurocom Sky X7E2 Intel Core i7-6700K	23815 Points +11%
MSI GE62 2QC-468XPL Intel Core i7-5700HQ	21681 Points +1%
Asus FX502VM-AS73 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	21376 Points
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.7 GHz, 455) Intel Core i7-6820HQ	21079 Points -1%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	19720 Points -8%
Rendering Single 32Bit
Eurocom Sky X7E2 Intel Core i7-6700K	6434 Points +14%
Asus FX502VM-AS73 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	5660 Points
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.7 GHz, 455) Intel Core i7-6820HQ	5580 Points -1%
MSI GE62 2QC-468XPL Intel Core i7-5700HQ	5567 Points -2%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	4720 Points -17%

wPrime 2.10 - 1024m
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.7 GHz, 455) Intel Core i7-6820HQ	241 s * -12%
Asus FX502VM-AS73 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	214.3 s *
MSI GE62 2QC-468XPL Intel Core i7-5700HQ	206.3 s * +4%
Eurocom Sky X7E2 Intel Core i7-6700K	205.9 s * +4%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

10685

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

21376

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

5660

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

66.8 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

7.99 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

1.67 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

114.9 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

725 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

140 Points

Help

... in comparison

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ	5011 Points +5%
Asus Strix GL502VM-DS74 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SSD 960 Evo 250GB m.2 NVMe	4967 Points +4%
Alienware 15 R3 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	4966 Points +4%
Asus FX502VM-AS73 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A	4765 Points
Gigabyte P55W v7 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Liteonit CV3-8D256	4013 Points -16%
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-7300HQ, WDC WD10SPCX-75KHST0 + SanDisk Z400s M.2 2242 32 GB Cache	3659 Points -23%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Asus Strix GL502VM-DS74 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SSD 960 Evo 250GB m.2 NVMe	5447 Points +100%
MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ	5406 Points +99%
Gigabyte P55W v7 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Liteonit CV3-8D256	5317 Points +95%
Alienware 15 R3 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	5299 Points +95%
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-7300HQ, WDC WD10SPCX-75KHST0 + SanDisk Z400s M.2 2242 32 GB Cache	4884 Points +79%
Asus FX502VM-AS73 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A	2722 Points
Creative Score Accelerated v2
MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ	7738 Points +7%
Alienware 15 R3 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	7678 Points +6%
Asus Strix GL502VM-DS74 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SSD 960 Evo 250GB m.2 NVMe	7332 Points +2%
Asus FX502VM-AS73 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A	7220 Points

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		4765 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		7220 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		2722 points
Help

	Asus FX502VM-AS73 SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A	Alienware 15 R3	Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) WDC WD10SPCX-75KHST0 + SanDisk Z400s M.2 2242 32 GB Cache	Gigabyte P55W v7 Liteonit CV3-8D256	Asus Strix GL502VM-DS74 Samsung SSD 960 Evo 250GB m.2 NVMe
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		146%	-75%	31%	351%
Read Seq	503	1123 123%	123 -76%	466.2 -7%	1747 247%
Write Seq	138.2	429.2 211%	74.2 -46%	261.9 90%	1477 969%
Read 512	343.5	833 143%	101.7 -70%	252.5 -26%	863 151%
Write 512	137.8	428.1 211%	42.51 -69%	254.8 85%	1115 709%
Read 4k	29.36	37.8 29%	10.84 -63%	25.4 -13%	56.8 93%
Write 4k	70.9	122.9 73%	1.021 -99%	55 -22%	152.4 115%
Read 4k QD32	369.9	542 47%	69.8 -81%	358.5 -3%	652 76%
Write 4k QD32	99.7	429.8 331%	1.057 -99%	240.1 141%	542 444%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

AS SSD

SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A

Sequential Read: 503 MB/s

Sequential Write: 138.2 MB/s

512K Read: 343.5 MB/s

512K Write: 137.8 MB/s

4K Read: 29.36 MB/s

4K Write: 70.9 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 369.9 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 99.7 MB/s

3DMark | 3DMark 11

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK	22566 Points +94%
Gigabyte P57X v7 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	17170 Points +48%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop), 6700K	12984 Points +12%
Asus FX502VM-AS73 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	11633 Points
Asus Strix GL502VM-DS74 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	11186 Points -4%
MSI GE72 7RE-046 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ	8086 Points -30%
HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	5961 Points -49%
Fire Strike Extreme Graphics
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK	10451 Points +91%
Gigabyte P57X v7 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	8236 Points +51%
Asus FX502VM-AS73 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	5463 Points
Asus Strix GL502VM-DS74 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	5369 Points -2%
HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	2694 Points -51%
3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra Graphics
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK	5046 Points +97%
Gigabyte P57X v7 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	4005 Points +56%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop), 6700K	2893 Points +13%
Asus FX502VM-AS73 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	2565 Points
Asus Strix GL502VM-DS74 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	2534 Points -1%

3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK	28595 Points +94%
Gigabyte P57X v7 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	23243 Points +58%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop), 6700K	17401 Points +18%
Asus FX502VM-AS73 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	14732 Points
Asus Strix GL502VM-DS74 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	14347 Points -3%
MSI GE72 7RE-046 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ	10186 Points -31%
HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	7649 Points -48%
1280x720 Performance Combined
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop), 6700K	11160 Points +24%
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK	11082 Points +24%
Gigabyte P57X v7 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	9116 Points +2%
Asus FX502VM-AS73 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	8967 Points
Asus Strix GL502VM-DS74 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	8583 Points -4%
HP Pavilion 17t-ab200 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	7440 Points -17%
MSI GE72 7RE-046 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ	7216 Points -20%

3DMark 11 Performance		12736 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		125692 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		25979 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		9845 points
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score		5189 points
Help

... in comparison

BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Aorus X7 DT v6 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e	164.7 fps +60%
Gigabyte P57X v7 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)	130 fps +26%
Asus FX502VM-AS73 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A	103.1 fps
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	86.4 fps -16%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077 GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630	66.2 fps -36%

Metro: Last Light - 1920x1080 Very High (DX11) AF:16x
Aorus X7 DT v6 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e	130 fps +64%
Asus FX502VM-AS73 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A	79.3 fps

Sleeping Dogs - 1920x1080 Extreme Preset AA:Extreme
Aorus X7 DT v6 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e	140.6 fps +81%
Gigabyte P57X v7 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)	116.3 fps +50%
Asus FX502VM-AS73 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A	77.5 fps
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	57.5 fps -26%

Thief - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FXAA & High SS AF:8x
Aorus X7 DT v6 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e	125 fps +62%
Asus FX502VM-AS73 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A	77.3 fps
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	58.6 fps -24%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077 GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630	43.6 fps -44%

Fallout 4 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T AF:16x
Aorus X7 DT v6 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e	124 fps +68%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop), 6700K	77.1 fps +5%
Asus FX502VM-AS73 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A	73.7 fps
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	57.9 fps -21%
MSI GE72 7RE-046 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY	46.2 fps -37%

Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x
Aorus X7 DT v6 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e	118 fps +92%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop), 6700K	66.9 fps +9%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop), 6700K	66.5 fps +8%
Asus FX502VM-AS73 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A	61.3 fps
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	55 fps -10%
MSI GE72 7RE-046 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY	39.7 fps -35%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077 GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630	33.7 fps -45%

Ashes of the Singularity - 1920x1080 high
Asus FX502VM-AS73 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A	54.8 fps
MSI GL62M 7RD-077 GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630	29.1 fps -47%

Doom - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:SM
Aorus X7 DT v6 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e	153 fps +61%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop), 6700K	99.7 fps +5%
Asus FX502VM-AS73 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A	95.1 fps
MSI GE72 7RE-046 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY	63.8 fps -33%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	56 fps -41%

Overwatch - 1920x1080 Epic (Render Scale 100 %) AA:SM AF:16x
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop), 6700K	116 fps +8%
Asus FX502VM-AS73 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A	107.3 fps
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	87.3 fps -19%
MSI GE72 7RE-046 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY	71 (59^min - 85^max) fps -34%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077 GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630	56 (48^min - 65^max) fps -48%

Mafia 3 - 1920x1080 High Preset
Asus FX502VM-AS73 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A	46.7 fps
MSI GE72 7RE-046 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY	28.7 fps -39%

	high	ultra
Sleeping Dogs (2012)		77.5
BioShock Infinite (2013)		103.1
Metro: Last Light (2013)		79.3
Thief (2014)		77.3
Metal Gear Solid V (2015)		60
Fallout 4 (2015)		73.7
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)		61.3
Ashes of the Singularity (2016)	54.8
Doom (2016)		95.1
Overwatch (2016)		107.3
Mafia 3 (2016)	46.7

Noise Level

Idle		30.6 / 30.6 / 31 dB(A)
Load		46.2 / 52.3 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: BK Precision 732A (15 cm distance) environment noise: 28.7 dB(A)

	Asus FX502VM-AS73 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A	Alienware 15 R3 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-7300HQ, WDC WD10SPCX-75KHST0 + SanDisk Z400s M.2 2242 32 GB Cache	Gigabyte P55W v7 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Liteonit CV3-8D256	Asus Strix GL502VM-DS74 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SSD 960 Evo 250GB m.2 NVMe
Noise		-8%	-2%	-3%	-4%
off / environment *	28.7	30 -5%	30.3 -6%	30 -5%	30.8 -7%
Idle Minimum *	30.6	31 -1%	31.6 -3%	33 -8%	32 -5%
Idle Average *	30.6	32 -5%	31.6 -3%	34 -11%	32 -5%
Idle Maximum *	31	42 -35%	33.4 -8%	35 -13%	32 -3%
Load Average *	46.2	49 -6%	47.8 -3%	39 16%	48.3 -5%
Load Maximum *	52.3	50 4%	47.8 9%	50 4%	51.2 2%

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load

Idle


39.8 °C	53.2 °C	38.8 °C
27.2 °C	43.6 °C	25.4 °C
21.6 °C	22 °C	22.2 °C

Maximum: 53.2 °C
Average: 32.6 °C


50.2 °C	56.8 °C	47 °C
25.8 °C	40.4 °C	23.4 °C
23.4 °C	23 °C	23 °C

Maximum: 56.8 °C
Average: 34.8 °C

Power Supply (max.) 44 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.6 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 53.2 °C / 128 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 56.8 °C / 134 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.5 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 23.4 °C / 74.1 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+5.5 °C / 9.9 F).

Asus FX502VM-AS73 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (67.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 94% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 87% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 11% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.46 / 0.74 Watt
Idle	14.9 / 15.1 / 15.2 Watt
Load	105.8 / 148.8 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Asus FX502VM-AS73	Alienware 15 R3	Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD)	Gigabyte P55W v7	Asus Strix GL502VM-DS74
Power Consumption		-36%	33%	15%	-102%
Idle Minimum *	14.9	19 -28%	6.6 56%	8 46%	38.3 -157%
Idle Average *	15.1	23 -52%	9 40%	13 14%	40.5 -168%
Idle Maximum *	15.2	29 -91%	10.7 30%	18 -18%	42.2 -178%
Load Average *	105.8	85 20%	77.5 27%	76 28%	110.4 -4%
Load Maximum *	148.8	192 -29%	130 13%	143 4%	155.7 -5%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		6h 03min
WiFi Websurfing		4h 37min
Load (maximum brightness)		1h 04min

	Asus FX502VM-AS73 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 64 Wh	Alienware 15 R3 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 99 Wh	Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) i5-7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 56 Wh	Gigabyte P55W v7 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 63 Wh	Asus Strix GL502VM-DS74 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 64 Wh
Battery Runtime		20%	36%	65%	-50%
Reader / Idle	363	382 5%	565 56%	789 117%	104 -71%
WiFi v1.3	277	264 -5%	334 21%	346 25%	88 -68%
Load	64	102 59%	84 31%	98 53%	57 -11%

Pros

+ 内部开拆开; 2x存储托架，1x SODIMM模块

+ 相对小巧轻薄的游戏笔记本

+ 性能强; 没有大的节流

+ 键盘按键安静

+ 支持NVMe 固态硬盘

Cons

- 非常差的TN屏幕; 无120 Hz / 5 ms选项

- 相对较大的风扇噪音; 风扇始终处于活动状态

- 3 GB GTX 1060，而不是6 GB GTX 1060

- 鼠标键可以更加坚固

- A面可以更坚硬

- 无USB Type-C

In review: Asus ROG FX502VM-AS73. $150 off at CUKUSA.com with code NBCUK-FX502.

即使在处理器和存储配置相同的情况下，FX502VM的价格也比GL502VM低几百美元。当然，它在其他方面做出了牺牲，包括缺乏USB C型接口和只有一半的VRAM的GTX 1060。即使考虑到被砍掉的性能，该机仍然是一个非常平衡的游戏本。这些缺点几乎1080p游戏游戏没有什么坏影响。除此之外，GL502VM的特点是，风扇噪声相对较大，盖子不稳固且缺乏Thunderbolt 3。GL502VM已经是一个很好的游戏笔记本电脑了，而FX502VM性能稍差，价格更优。该机明显比微星GE / GL系列更薄，并且可以说比惠普Omen系列更具吸引力，同时比目前的技嘉科技的产品更便宜。