亚马逊Fire HD 8(2022)平板电脑评论--在一个方面与Apple iPad Mini相当
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
80.4 % v7 (old) | 01 / 2023 | Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 MT8169A, Mali-G52 MP2 | 337 g | 9.7 mm | 8.00" | 1280x800 | |
80.8 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2020 | Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 MT8168, Mali-G52 MP1 | 355 g | 9.7 mm | 8.00" | 1280x800 | |
79.7 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2021 | Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite Helio P22T MT8768T, PowerVR GE8320 | 366 g | 8 mm | 8.70" | 1340x800 | |
80.9 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2022 | Huawei MatePad T10S Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4 | 450 g | 7.85 mm | 10.10" | 1920x1200 | |
90.7 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2021 | Apple iPad Mini 6 A15, A15 GPU 5-Core | 297 g | 6.3 mm | 8.30" | 2266x1488 |
保护壳 - 亚马逊Fire HD 8,有很多塑料制品
与上一代相比,亚马逊在设计上没有做任何重大改变。 前一代产品.包括Fire HD 8的铝硅酸盐玻璃在内的屏幕周围的边缘仍然非常宽,因此实现了略低于67%的显示与表面比率。然而,2022年的机型变得更薄、更轻了一些。与前代产品(355克)相比,新的Fire HD 8平板电脑现在重337克,也更薄一些,只有9.6毫米。
亚马逊平板电脑的背面再次由塑料材料制成,据说后者含有高达35%的可回收消费废物。虽然最新一代的Fire HD 8没有带来改进,但其制造质量仍然令人满意。
特点 - 具有内存扩展功能的亚马逊平板电脑
Fire HD 8(2022)可以在不同的配置变体中购买,每个变体都有2GB的内存。在 "有广告 "的版本中,赞助的屏幕内容显示在亚马逊平板电脑的锁屏以及闲置模式中。你可以选择。
Fire HD 8 (2022)| 32GB内存| 115欧元带广告
Fire HD 8 (2022)| 32 GB存储| 130欧元,无广告
Fire HD 8 (2022)| 64 GB存储| 145欧元,有广告
Fire HD 8 (2022)| 64 GB内存| 160欧元无广告
扣除操作系统后,用户大约有25GB可以自己支配。Fire平板电脑的存储空间还可以通过添加microSD卡扩展至1TB。
微型SD卡读卡器
集成的microSD插槽结合我们的Angelbird AV PRO V60参考卡,在跨平台磁盘测试中取得了稳健的表现。Fire HD 8 2022的复制速度约为20MB/s,相当低于平均水平。
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 (Angelbird V60) | |
Huawei MatePad T10S (Angelbird V60) |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
软件--Fire HD 8 2022年,长期更新
这家美国在线零售商对底层Android 操作系统的改编非常广泛。Fire OS的用户界面不是基于最新的Android 13,而是仍然基于Android 11。安全更新也不能在Fire OS 8.3下直接读取。
廉价的亚马逊平板电脑的一个真正的亮点是,在Fire HD 8最后一次作为新设备在制造商的网站上购买后的至少四年内,保证软件安全更新的供应时间非常长。因此,Fire Tab应该至少在2027年之前收到安全更新,而不是2028年。在这里,亚马逊的平板电脑与Apple ,处于同一水平。
出厂后,Fire平板电脑只提供亚马逊应用商店,它提供一些常见的应用程序,但缺乏Play商店的广泛的应用程序种类。只要有一些背景知识,就可以安装谷歌服务和谷歌游戏商店。但是,没有Play Protect认证,所以有些应用无法安装。受DRM保护的内容可以在8英寸屏幕上以高清分辨率播放,因为DRM Widevine认证是L1。
通信和GNSS - 带Wi-Fi 5的亚马逊平板电脑
由于2.4GHz和5GHz频率范围内的802.11 a/b/g/n和ac标准,通过WLAN模块的数据传输速度成功超过300 Mbit/s。用我们的参考路由器华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000确定的数值对于这个价格范围内的平板电脑来说非常令人满意,但不是真的快。
没有任何版本的Fire HD 8 2022具有移动互联网接入或通过卫星连接定位的选项。
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Apple iPad Mini 6 | |
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Apple iPad Mini 6 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite | |
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 | |
Huawei MatePad T10S | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 | |
Huawei MatePad T10S |
摄像机--Fire HD 8 2022,带单摄像头
一个200万像素的前置摄像头位于显示屏的上框。照片的质量处于中等水平。细节几乎不存在,颜色看起来非常苍白。亚马逊平板电脑录制的视频分辨率高达720p。使用 "主摄像头 "至少可以录制1080p的视频,尽管同样的200万像素单摄像头(可能)安装在背面。
在很多光线下,图像清晰度和记录的细节并不比前置摄像头更吸引人,尽管记录的清晰度略好。在人工光线下和在X-Rite ColorChecker Passport的帮助下,颜色的再现可以说是扎实的,但明显变亮。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain cameraLow Light配件和保修 - 亚马逊Fire平板电脑与电源适配器
Fire HD 8配备了一个模块化的充电器,其额定功率输出为5瓦,以及一条USB Type-C电缆。然而,亚马逊还提供额外的配件,从配套的保护壳(建议零售价:40欧元)到屏幕保护膜(建议零售价:18欧元)。
Fire HD 8平板电脑在销售时享有一年的制造商有限保修。有限保修是对所有适用的消费品法定保修要求的补充,不以任何方式影响它们。
输入设备和操作 - 亚马逊平板电脑无指纹传感器
Fire HD 8的电容式触摸屏可以精确操作到边角。然而,这款亚马逊平板电脑不能通过指纹传感器或生物面部识别来解锁。你仍然必须使用经典的PIN码或密码,这已经不是真正的最新版本了。
显示屏 - Fire HD 8 2022,采用IPS面板
|
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 388 cd/m²
Contrast: 1078:1 (Black: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.38 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
77.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.232
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 LCD, 1280x800, 8" | Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 IPS, 1280x800, 8" | Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite TFT, 1340x800, 8.7" | Huawei MatePad T10S LCD IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1" | Apple iPad Mini 6 IPS, 2266x1488, 8.3" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 34% | -23% | -12% | 24% | |
Brightness middle | 388 | 501 29% | 360 -7% | 285 -27% | 453 17% |
Brightness | 364 | 463 27% | 332 -9% | 282 -23% | 440 21% |
Brightness Distribution | 90 | 85 -6% | 85 -6% | 91 1% | 94 4% |
Black Level * | 0.36 | 0.25 31% | 0.24 33% | 0.3 17% | 0.4 -11% |
Contrast | 1078 | 2004 86% | 1500 39% | 950 -12% | 1133 5% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.38 | 3.6 18% | 6.7 -53% | 3.53 19% | 1.52 65% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.7 | 8.4 21% | 12.4 -16% | 5.84 45% | 3.28 69% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.9 | 1 66% | 7.6 -162% | 6.2 -114% | 2.3 21% |
Gamma | 2.232 99% | 2.17 101% | 2.33 94% | 2.044 108% | 2.26 97% |
CCT | 6221 104% | 6473 100% | 8744 74% | 8130 80% | 6900 94% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
具有固定变焦水平和不同亮度设置的测量系列
我们用光谱仪和CalMAN分析软件检查显示器的色彩表现。亚马逊平板电脑提供了一个坚实的显示校准,但即使在sRGB色彩空间中,也可以看到色彩的显著差异。特别是蓝色和洋红色的颜色可以更加饱和。然而,在这个价格范围内,图像再现仍然可以接受,颜色的DeltaE偏差为4.4,灰度为2.9。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
19.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13 ms rise | |
↘ 6.5 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
40.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22.6 ms rise | |
↘ 17.5 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 60 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Fire HD 8在户外感觉并不舒适,在强光环境下只能提供有限的可读性--即使是在风雪条件下的测试期间。视角处于良好水平。
性能--采用联发科SoC的亚马逊平板电脑
亚马逊再次为其入门级平板电脑采用了联发科的SoC,在Fire HD 8 2022的情况下,采用了MT8169A.这是基于六个相当弱的Cortex-A55核心(2.0 GHz)。集成图形单元是一个 Mali-G52 MP2.
在日常使用中,亚马逊平板电脑的系统速度很稳定,但不是没有停顿。滚动互联网页面在大多数时候也不是很流畅。在我们的基准测试中,2022年型号的性能通常比上一代型号的性能高出15%至30%。 前代机型.尽管如此,该性能应被评估为非常低。特别是eMMC存储类型,年事已高,非常缓慢。
由于只有2GB内存的低内存配置,一些基准测试无法执行。此外,像Geekbench或CrossMark这样的测试在测量过程中会中止。
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 | |
Average of class Tablet (3195 - 20841, n=73, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MatePad T10S | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite | |
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 | |
Average MediaTek MT8169A (5028 - 5028, n=2) |
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI | |
Average of class Tablet (1662 - 74821, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 | |
Average MediaTek MT8169A () | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | |
Apple iPad Mini 6 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite | |
Huawei MatePad T10S | |
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 | |
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | |
Apple iPad Mini 6 | |
Huawei MatePad T10S | |
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 | |
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | |
Huawei MatePad T10S | |
Apple iPad Mini 6 | |
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 | |
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite | |
Huawei MatePad T10S | |
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 | |
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics | |
Huawei MatePad T10S | |
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite | |
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics | |
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 | |
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite | |
Huawei MatePad T10S |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) | |
Huawei MatePad T10S | |
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 | |
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics | |
Huawei MatePad T10S | |
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 | |
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics | |
Huawei MatePad T10S | |
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 | |
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen | |
Apple iPad Mini 6 | |
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 | |
Huawei MatePad T10S | |
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen | |
Apple iPad Mini 6 | |
Huawei MatePad T10S | |
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 | |
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite |
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
Apple iPad Mini 6 | |
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 | |
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 | |
Huawei MatePad T10S | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite |
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
Apple iPad Mini 6 | |
Huawei MatePad T10S | |
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 | |
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
Apple iPad Mini 6 | |
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 | |
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 | |
Huawei MatePad T10S | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
Apple iPad Mini 6 | |
Huawei MatePad T10S | |
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite | |
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 |
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen | |
Apple iPad Mini 6 | |
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 | |
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 | |
Huawei MatePad T10S | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite |
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen | |
Apple iPad Mini 6 | |
Huawei MatePad T10S | |
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 | |
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
Apple iPad Mini 6 | |
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 | |
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite | |
Huawei MatePad T10S |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Apple iPad Mini 6 | |
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 | |
Huawei MatePad T10S | |
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
Apple iPad Mini 6 | |
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 | |
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite | |
Huawei MatePad T10S |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
Apple iPad Mini 6 | |
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 | |
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 | |
Huawei MatePad T10S | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite |
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
Apple iPad Mini 6 (Safari 15) | |
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=69, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MatePad T10S (Huawei V12) | |
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 (Silk Browser 106) | |
Average MediaTek MT8169A (23.5 - 23.5, n=2) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite (Chrome 92.0.4515.115) |
WebXPRT 4 - Overall | |
Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 (Silk Browser 106) | |
Average MediaTek MT8169A (25 - 25, n=2) |
WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
Apple iPad Mini 6 (Safari 15) | |
Average of class Tablet (34 - 435, n=45, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MatePad T10S (Huawei V12) | |
Average MediaTek MT8169A (34 - 43, n=2) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite (Chrome 92.0.4515.115) | |
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 (Silk Browser 106) | |
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 (Silk Browser) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Apple iPad Mini 6 (Safari 15) | |
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MatePad T10S (Huawei V12) | |
Average MediaTek MT8169A (15.8 - 15.8, n=2) | |
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 (Silk Browser 106) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite (Chrome 92.0.4515.115) | |
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 (Silk Browser) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Apple iPad Mini 6 (Safari 15) | |
Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MatePad T10S (Huawei V12) | |
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 (Silk Browser 106) | |
Average MediaTek MT8169A (5843 - 5843, n=2) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite (Chrome 92.0.4515.115) | |
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 (Silk Browser) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite (Chrome 92.0.4515.115) | |
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 (Silk Browser) | |
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 (Silk Browser 106) | |
Average MediaTek MT8169A (9435 - 9435, n=2) | |
Huawei MatePad T10S (Huawei V12) | |
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=74, last 2 years) | |
Apple iPad Mini 6 (Safari 15) |
* ... smaller is better
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 | Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 | Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite | Huawei MatePad T10S | Apple iPad Mini 6 | Average 32 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Tablet | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | 15% | 33% | 55% | 0% | 507% | ||
Sequential Read 256KB | 270.37 | 315 17% | 271.1 0% | 302.9 12% | 242 ? -10% | 1045 ? 287% | |
Sequential Write 256KB | 113.44 | 103.9 -8% | 87.2 -23% | 99 -13% | 100.5 ? -11% | 684 ? 503% | |
Random Read 4KB | 39.46 | 67.6 71% | 60.8 54% | 51.1 29% | 43.2 ? 9% | 189.2 ? 379% | |
Random Write 4KB | 19.81 | 15.72 -21% | 39.51 99% | 57.8 192% | 22.4 ? 13% | 189.5 ? 857% |
排放 - Fire HD 8 2022年保持凉爽
温度
表面温度处于非临界范围。即使在负载下,表面也不会出现令人不舒服的热度。在我们的测量中,Fire HD 8在连续满载的情况下平均加热到27℃。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 31.5 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.3 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.4 °C / 72 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
演讲者
Fire HD 8的声音特点是中频和高频的音调被相当线性地再现。然而,低音调几乎完全感觉不到。想要更多深度的用户可以通过3.5毫米插孔使用耳机,或通过蓝牙5.2无线使用。
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 64% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 62% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电源管理 - 亚马逊平板电脑消耗大量的电力
消耗功率
使用附带的5瓦充电器,Fire平板电脑需要大约4.5小时的完整充电周期。据亚马逊称,使用可选的9瓦充电器,充电时间缩短到3小时以内,使用15瓦充电器,充电时间缩短到2.5小时以内。
2022年型号的耗电量明显高于前者闲置时的功率为1.4瓦,效率不高。
Off / Standby | 0.1 / 0.2 Watt |
Idle | 1.2 / 1.4 / 1.7 Watt |
Load |
2.5 / 4.3 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 4850 mAh | Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 4850 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite 5100 mAh | Huawei MatePad T10S 5100 mAh | Apple iPad Mini 6 5177 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -46% | -48% | -124% | -106% | |
Idle Minimum * | 1.2 | 0.72 40% | 0.78 35% | 1.6 -33% | 1.1 8% |
Idle Average * | 1.4 | 2.97 -112% | 2.88 -106% | 2.8 -100% | 2.2 -57% |
Idle Maximum * | 1.7 | 2.99 -76% | 2.91 -71% | 3.5 -106% | 4.2 -147% |
Load Average * | 2.5 | 4.02 -61% | 4 -60% | 7.9 -216% | 6.7 -168% |
Load Maximum * | 4.3 | 5.1 -19% | 6.04 -40% | 11.5 -167% | 11.4 -165% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)
电池寿命
根据制造商的说法,Fire HD 8中安装的4850毫安电池应能实现13小时的播放。我们可以在实际的Wi-Fi测试中确认这一数值,显示亮度为150cd/m²。大约12小时后,Fire Tab在20%时退出所有应用程序,进入待机状态。因此,在我们的测量中,亚马逊的平板电脑理论上可以持续使用约15小时。
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 4850 mAh | Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 4850 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite 5100 mAh | Huawei MatePad T10S 5100 mAh | Apple iPad Mini 6 5177 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | |||||
WiFi v1.3 | 935 | 902 -4% | 803 -14% | 557 -40% | 816 -13% |
Pros
Cons
判决书
2022年的Fire HD 8只是对前代产品的部分成功升级,从 2020年.仅仅根据技术规格来评判一款亚马逊平板电脑是很难的,但目前的Fire一代与2020年的型号相比,在许多方面没有提供任何附加值--在某些情况下,它甚至是一种退步。
在我们的测量中,仍然相对低分辨率的IPS面板无法令人信服,其峰值亮度低于400 cd/m²。缺乏生物识别解锁选项和缓慢的eMMC存储类型也不再是真正的最新技术。
对Fire HD 8的评价取决于用户对美国巨人的亲和力,因为亚马逊平板电脑只有在拥有亚马逊账户和Prime会员资格的情况下才能真正使用。
Fire HD 8 2022年显示了它在软件支持方面的优势,据亚马逊称,它应该至少可以持续到2027年,甚至可能更长。除了低价之外,亚马逊的平板电脑还提供了坚实的结构和很少的废热。市场上几乎没有提供任何小型平板电脑的替代品。与Fire HD8买家的要求最接近的是 三星Galaxy Tab A7 Lite.
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
- 01/10/2023 v7 (old)
Marcus Herbrich