努比亚 Flip 5G 评测--配备出色显示屏的经济型翻盖手机
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price from |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 85.4 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2024 | Nubia Flip 5G SD 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644 | 214 g | 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.90" | 2790x1188 | |
| 86.3 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2024 | Oppo Find N3 Flip Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11 | 201 g | 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.80" | 2520x1080 | |
| 83.3 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2023 | Tecno Phantom V Flip Dimensity 8050, Mali-G77 MP9 | 194 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.90" | 2640x1080 | |
| 86.9 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2023 | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740 | 187 g | 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.70" | 2640x1080 | |
| 86.4 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2023 | Motorola Razr 40 SD 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644 | 188.6 g | 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.90" | 2640x1080 |
外壳和连接性 - 采用哑光铝合金边框的努比亚 Flip 5G
努比亚 Flip 5G 有宇宙黑、流光紫丁香 和 阳光金三种颜色可供选择。购买者可以选择两种内存版本：8 GB 内存配 256 GB 存储空间或 12 GB 内存配 512 GB 存储空间。我们的测试机是金色款。
我们喜欢努比亚 Flip 的制造质量。所有缝隙都紧密均匀，显示屏表面比率为 86%，相当不错，但远低于制造商的规格（95.4%）。铰链据说可以承受 200,000 次以上的折叠，并允许多种打开角度。虽然显示屏折叠很容易看到和感觉到，但并不影响日常使用。不过，作为一款可折叠智能手机，Flip 的机身相当厚重。
通信、软件和操作
努比亚 Flip 5G 仍然搭载谷歌Android 13，制造商在其上安装了自己的 MyOS 13.5 用户界面。有点遗憾的是，努比亚只提供了三年的安全补丁和一次重大升级。在测试时，最新安全补丁的日期是 2024 年 2 月 1 日，因此不再是完全最新的。
手机的外部显示屏可以配置自定义背景和常亮显示。其功能范围包括多达八个小部件：相机、天气、音乐控制、日历、约会概览、计步器、秒表和录音机。这些小部件还可以单独停用和分类。
值得称赞的是，该设备支持 Wi-Fi 6E，而在这个价格范围内，Wi-Fi 6E 还不是必须的。与我们的参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 结合使用，Flip 实现了高稳定的传输值。它还覆盖了充足的蜂窝频率，我们的努比亚可折叠手机在测试中没有遇到任何接收问题。只要把智能手机放在耳边，通话质量还是不错的，只是在过滤背景噪音方面做得不太好。
在生物识别安全方面，指纹传感器集成在手机的电源按钮上，识别率很高，解锁 Flip 5G 的速度也不错。通过摄像头进行面部识别解锁同样可靠，但安全性较低。
| Networking | |
| Nubia Flip 5G | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Oppo Find N3 Flip | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Tecno Phantom V Flip | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Motorola Razr 40 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
相机 - 三星 JN1 的出色照片
前置摄像头的拍照性能相当一般。照片显得有些苍白，细节也不是特别丰富。视频只能以全高清（30fps）格式录制。
反过来，封面显示屏也可用作主摄像头的取景器，从而获得更好的自拍效果。通过小面板进行的操作相当有限，因为只能在照片、肖像和视频之间切换，但它确实起到了作用。
主摄像头使用三星 JN1 传感器，照片效果不错。在弱光环境下拍摄的照片也令人印象深刻。不过，第二镜头只能提供深度信息；努比亚 Flip 5G 没有超广角或光学变焦功能。
视频可以 30fps 的超高清或 60fps 的全高清格式录制。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain camera5x zoomLow light
显示屏 - Flip 5G 采用明亮、精确的 120 Hz 面板
努比亚 Flip 5G 的 6.9 英寸 OLED 显示屏亮度非常高，在激活环境光传感器的情况下，纯白显示屏的亮度可达 1,193 cd/m²。在 APL18 测试（1,195 cd/m²）和 HDR 测量（1,149 cd/m²）中，这一数值也相当稳定。如果手动调节亮度，最高可达 550 cd/m²。它的色彩和灰度刻画非常准确。
根据努比亚的说法，Flip 5G 提供高达 2,160 Hz 的高频 PWM 调光；我们在最低显示亮度下测得的频率为 1,818 Hz，低频闪烁（60 Hz）幅度较大。这可能是黑框插入 (BFI)，用于减少运动模糊和保护烧损。因此，翻盖智能手机应该比较容易看清。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 1164 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 1.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.2
| Nubia Flip 5G OLED, 2790x1188, 6.9" | Oppo Find N3 Flip AMOLED, 2520x1080, 6.8" | Tecno Phantom V Flip AMOLED, 2640x1080, 6.9" | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G Dynamic AMOLED, 2640x1080, 6.7" | Motorola Razr 40 P-OLED, 2640x1080, 6.9" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response Times | -49% | -35% | -26% | 10% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 0.69 ? | 2.13 ? -209% | 1.5 ? -117% | 1.42 ? -106% | 1.7 ? -146% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 1.03 ? | 1.43 ? -39% | 0.9 ? 13% | 1.78 ? -73% | 1.3 ? -26% |
| PWM Frequency | 60 | 120 100% | 60 0% | 120 100% | 180.3 201% |
| Screen | -7% | -148% | -95% | -29% | |
| Brightness middle | 1164 | 922 -21% | 822 -29% | 836 -28% | 982 -16% |
| Brightness | 1172 | 932 -20% | 797 -32% | 848 -28% | 1002 -15% |
| Brightness Distribution | 97 | 96 -1% | 95 -2% | 97 0% | 85 -12% |
| Black Level * | |||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 0.7 | 0.7 -0% | 3.5 -400% | 2.6 -271% | 0.93 -33% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 1.5 | 1.8 -20% | 6.6 -340% | 4.5 -200% | 2.52 -68% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.1 | 0.9 18% | 2 -82% | 1.6 -45% | 1.4 -27% |
| Gamma | 2.2 100% | 2.24 98% | 2.249 98% | 2.22 99% | 2.188 101% |
| CCT | 6482 100% | 6569 99% | 6815 95% | 6319 103% | 6480 100% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -28% /
-21% | -92% /
-110% | -61% /
-72% | -10% /
-16% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1.03 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.516 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.514 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 0.69 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.3435 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.3505 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 60 Hz Amplitude: 21.4 % |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 60 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 60 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平，但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图）。
性能、排放和电池寿命
努比亚 Flip 5G 采用了 骁龙 7 代 1处理器，该处理器也用于 Razr 40.该处理器提供的性能可确保系统流畅运行，而且在努比亚预计的更新周期内应该有足够的储备。
虽然努比亚智能手机在持续高负荷运行的情况下温度会很高，但始终保持在安全范围内。即使在这种情况下，SoC 也能持续发挥其全部性能。
两个扬声器在中等音量时听起来相当不错，但随着音量的增大，它们会产生强烈的回声，听起来很空洞。
努比亚 Flip 的电池容量为 4,310 毫安时，容量相对较大，续航时间出人意料地长。这款可折叠智能手机的最大充电功率为 33 瓦--交货时随附了合适的电源适配器。为电池充电大约需要一个小时，仅 20 分钟后电池就已充满 50%。
| Nubia Flip 5G | Oppo Find N3 Flip | Tecno Phantom V Flip | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G | Motorola Razr 40 | Average 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 181% | 40% | 119% | 0% | -13% | 47% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 967.4 | 3794 292% | 1814.9 88% | 3412.35 253% | 955.8 -1% | 887 ? -8% | 1839 ? 90% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 766.69 | 2965 287% | 1490.7 94% | 2289.61 199% | 804.3 5% | 694 ? -9% | 1425 ? 86% |
| Random Read 4KB | 263.87 | 411 56% | 249.9 -5% | 444.6 68% | 290.8 10% | 228 ? -14% | 277 ? 5% |
| Random Write 4KB | 295.55 | 558 89% | 238.9 -19% | 161.87 -45% | 257.5 -13% | 238 ? -19% | 309 ? 5% |
温度
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47.7 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.4 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.2 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
3DMark Wild Life Stress Test
发言人
Nubia Flip 5G audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 59% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
运行时间
Pros
Cons
结论--努比亚 Flip 5G 功能上的差距
努比亚 Flip 5G 电池续航时间长，显示效果出色，因此卖点十足。Wi-Fi 6E 在这个价位的手机中仍属罕见，其主摄像头的拍摄效果也不错。
努比亚 Flip 5G 是一款不错的可折叠智能手机，但就其价格而言，有时显得过于纤薄。
另一方面，Flip 也不得不面对一些批评。例如，它只支持几种 HDR 标准，而且不支持 eSIM。我们还希望能增加一个超广角镜头或光学变焦镜头。它的更新周期也很短。
499 美元或 699 美元的价格乍听之下非常诱人，但存储空间更大的 Galaxy Z Flip 5并没有贵很多，而且 Flip 4甚至更便宜。即使是 Razr 40现在也不到 700 美元。
价格和供应情况
努比亚 Flip 5G 可直接从制造商的网站上购买。售价 499 美元起。
Nubia Flip 5G
- 06/17/2024 v7 (old)
Daniel Schmidt
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Price comparison
