Notebookcheck Logo

努比亚 Flip 5G 评测--配备出色显示屏的经济型翻盖手机

价格低廉的可折叠智能手机

努比亚 Flip 5G 的目标是成为一款经济实惠的可折叠手机。它以中端 SoC、令人惊喜的显示屏和两种存储空间来争夺买家的注意力。您可以在这篇评测中了解所有细节。
5G Android Foldable Smartphone Touchscreen
(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）
Nubia Flip 5G
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 8 x 1.8 - 2.4 GHz, Cortex-A710 / A510
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 644
Memory
8 GB 
, LPDDR5
Display
6.90 inch 21:9, 2790 x 1188 pixel 439 PPI, Capacitive touchscreen, OLED, 2160 Hz PWM dimming, external screen: Vinyl Magic Box, 1.43", 466 x 466 pixels, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 256 GB 
, 224.53 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, OTG
Networking
Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 8), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 2, 3, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.3 x 170 x 76
Battery
4310 mAh Lithium-Ion, 33-watt charging
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 13
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (Samsung JN1, AF, f/1.8) + 2 MPix (SmartSense SC202CS, FF, Depth lens); Camera2-API-Level: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix (OmniVision OV16A1Q, f/2.45)
Additional features
Speakers: Dual, Keyboard: OnScreen, Charger, USB cable, case, MyOS 13.5, 12 Months Warranty, Head-SAR: 1.242 W/kg, Body-SAR: 1.314 W/kg; HDR: HLG, HDR10; GNSS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (L1), BeiDou (B1, B1C, B2a), Galileo (E1, E5a); DRM Widevine L1; Bluetooth Audio-Codecs: SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX TWS+, LDAC, LC3, fanless
Weight
214 g, Power Supply: 99 g
Price
599 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price from
85.4 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2024
Nubia Flip 5G
SD 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644		214 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.90"2790x1188
86.3 %
v7 (old)
02 / 2024
Oppo Find N3 Flip
Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11		201 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.80"2520x1080
83.3 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2023
Tecno Phantom V Flip
Dimensity 8050, Mali-G77 MP9		194 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.90"2640x1080
86.9 %
v7 (old)
08 / 2023
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740		187 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.70"2640x1080
86.4 %
v7 (old)
07 / 2023
Motorola Razr 40
SD 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644		188.6 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.90"2640x1080

外壳和连接性 - 采用哑光铝合金边框的努比亚 Flip 5G

努比亚 Flip 5G 有宇宙黑、流光紫丁香 和 阳光金三种颜色可供选择。购买者可以选择两种内存版本：8 GB 内存配 256 GB 存储空间或 12 GB 内存配 512 GB 存储空间。我们的测试机是金色款。

我们喜欢努比亚 Flip 的制造质量。所有缝隙都紧密均匀，显示屏表面比率为 86%，相当不错，但远低于制造商的规格（95.4%）。铰链据说可以承受 200,000 次以上的折叠，并允许多种打开角度。虽然显示屏折叠很容易看到和感觉到，但并不影响日常使用。不过，作为一款可折叠智能手机，Flip 的机身相当厚重。

尺寸比较

❌
171.7 mm 74 mm 6.95 mm 194 g170.8 mm 74 mm 7.4 mm 188.6 g170 mm 76 mm 7.3 mm 214 g166.4 mm 75.8 mm 7.8 mm 201 g165.1 mm 71.9 mm 6.9 mm 187 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

尺寸比较

❌
88 mm 76 mm 15.5 mm 214 g88.4 mm 74 mm 15.1 mm 188.5 g85.5 mm 75.8 mm 16.45 mm 198 g

通信、软件和操作

努比亚 Flip 5G 仍然搭载谷歌Android 13，制造商在其上安装了自己的 MyOS 13.5 用户界面。有点遗憾的是，努比亚只提供了三年的安全补丁和一次重大升级。在测试时，最新安全补丁的日期是 2024 年 2 月 1 日，因此不再是完全最新的。

手机的外部显示屏可以配置自定义背景和常亮显示。其功能范围包括多达八个小部件：相机、天气、音乐控制、日历、约会概览、计步器、秒表和录音机。这些小部件还可以单独停用和分类。

值得称赞的是，该设备支持 Wi-Fi 6E，而在这个价格范围内，Wi-Fi 6E 还不是必须的。与我们的参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 结合使用，Flip 实现了高稳定的传输值。它还覆盖了充足的蜂窝频率，我们的努比亚可折叠手机在测试中没有遇到任何接收问题。只要把智能手机放在耳边，通话质量还是不错的，只是在过滤背景噪音方面做得不太好。

在生物识别安全方面，指纹传感器集成在手机的电源按钮上，识别率很高，解锁 Flip 5G 的速度也不错。通过摄像头进行面部识别解锁同样可靠，但安全性较低。

Networking
Nubia Flip 5G
Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
954 (min: 472) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
986 (min: 846) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1759 (min: 1696) MBit/s ∼99%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1844 (min: 1767) MBit/s ∼100%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
850 (min: 594) MBit/s ∼89%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
920 (min: 904) MBit/s ∼93%
Tecno Phantom V Flip
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
709 (min: 588) MBit/s ∼74%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
805 (min: 628) MBit/s ∼82%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
906 (min: 454) MBit/s ∼95%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
942 (min: 480) MBit/s ∼96%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1768 (min: 918) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1576 (min: 1208) MBit/s ∼85%
Motorola Razr 40
Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1483 (min: 1278) MBit/s ∼84%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1050 (min: 961) MBit/s ∼57%
095190285380475570665760855950104511401235133014251520161517101805Tooltip
Nubia Flip 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 644; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1759 (1696-1796)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1738 (918-1821)
Nubia Flip 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 644; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1833 (1767-1874)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1576 (1208-1634)
Nubia Flip 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 644; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø985 (846-1019)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø925 (480-957)
Nubia Flip 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 644; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø939 (472-979)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø891 (454-945)

相机 - 三星 JN1 的出色照片

通过盖板显示屏使用主摄像头自拍
通过盖板显示屏使用主摄像头自拍
使用前置内摄像头自拍
使用前置内摄像头自拍

前置摄像头的拍照性能相当一般。照片显得有些苍白，细节也不是特别丰富。视频只能以全高清（30fps）格式录制。

反过来，封面显示屏也可用作主摄像头的取景器，从而获得更好的自拍效果。通过小面板进行的操作相当有限，因为只能在照片、肖像和视频之间切换，但它确实起到了作用。

主摄像头使用三星 JN1 传感器，照片效果不错。在弱光环境下拍摄的照片也令人印象深刻。不过，第二镜头只能提供深度信息；努比亚 Flip 5G 没有超广角或光学变焦功能。

视频可以 30fps 的超高清或 60fps 的全高清格式录制。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain camera5x zoomLow light
orginal image
click to load images
ColorChecker
10.6 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
6 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
10 ∆E
10 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
8 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Nubia Flip 5G: 8.02 ∆E min: 2.94 - max: 13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker
28.9 ∆E
46.1 ∆E
36.6 ∆E
30.8 ∆E
40.4 ∆E
54.5 ∆E
44.5 ∆E
30.2 ∆E
32.9 ∆E
28.6 ∆E
55.7 ∆E
55.7 ∆E
25.5 ∆E
42 ∆E
28.2 ∆E
63.9 ∆E
36.7 ∆E
38.5 ∆E
66.4 ∆E
64 ∆E
48.2 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Nubia Flip 5G: 40.43 ∆E min: 13.35 - max: 66.4 ∆E

显示屏 - Flip 5G 采用明亮、精确的 120 Hz 面板

子像素阵列（封面显示）
子像素阵列（封面显示）
子像素阵列（可折叠显示屏）
子像素阵列（可折叠显示屏）

努比亚 Flip 5G 的 6.9 英寸 OLED 显示屏亮度非常高，在激活环境光传感器的情况下，纯白显示屏的亮度可达 1,193 cd/m²。在 APL18 测试（1,195 cd/m²）和 HDR 测量（1,149 cd/m²）中，这一数值也相当稳定。如果手动调节亮度，最高可达 550 cd/m²。它的色彩和灰度刻画非常准确。

根据努比亚的说法，Flip 5G 提供高达 2,160 Hz 的高频 PWM 调光；我们在最低显示亮度下测得的频率为 1,818 Hz，低频闪烁（60 Hz）幅度较大。这可能是黑框插入 (BFI)，用于减少运动模糊和保护烧损。因此，翻盖智能手机应该比较容易看清。

1169
cd/m²		1156
cd/m²		1179
cd/m²
1164
cd/m²		1164
cd/m²		1187
cd/m²
1179
cd/m²		1157
cd/m²		1193
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1193 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1172 cd/m² Minimum: 2.49 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 1164 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.2
Nubia Flip 5G
OLED, 2790x1188, 6.9"		Oppo Find N3 Flip
AMOLED, 2520x1080, 6.8"		Tecno Phantom V Flip
AMOLED, 2640x1080, 6.9"		Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Dynamic AMOLED, 2640x1080, 6.7"		Motorola Razr 40
P-OLED, 2640x1080, 6.9"
Response Times
-49%
-35%
-26%
10%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
0.69 ?(0.3435, 0.3505)
2.13 ?(1.159, 0.974)
-209%
1.5 ?(0.7, 0.8)
-117%
1.42 ?(0.716, 0.703)
-106%
1.7 ?(0.8, 0.9)
-146%
Response Time Black / White *
1.03 ?(0.516, 0.514)
1.43 ?(0.738, 0.695)
-39%
0.9 ?(0.4, 0.5)
13%
1.78 ?(1.005, 0.777)
-73%
1.3 ?(0.6, 0.7)
-26%
PWM Frequency
60
120
100%
60
0%
120
100%
180.3
201%
Screen
-7%
-148%
-95%
-29%
Brightness middle
1164
922
-21%
822
-29%
836
-28%
982
-16%
Brightness
1172
932
-20%
797
-32%
848
-28%
1002
-15%
Brightness Distribution
97
96
-1%
95
-2%
97
0%
85
-12%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
0.7
0.7
-0%
3.5
-400%
2.6
-271%
0.93
-33%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
1.5
1.8
-20%
6.6
-340%
4.5
-200%
2.52
-68%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.1
0.9
18%
2
-82%
1.6
-45%
1.4
-27%
Gamma
2.2 100%
2.24 98%
2.249 98%
2.22 99%
2.188 101%
CCT
6482 100%
6569 99%
6815 95%
6319 103%
6480 100%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-28% / -21%
-92% / -110%
-61% / -72%
-10% / -16%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
1.03 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.516 ms rise
↘ 0.514 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
0.69 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.3435 ms rise
↘ 0.3505 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 60 Hz
Amplitude: 21.4 %

The display backlight flickers at 60 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 60 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

关闭显示屏
关闭
最低显示亮度
分钟
25 % 显示屏亮度
25 %
显示屏亮度为 50
50 %
75 % 显示亮度
75 %
最大手动显示亮度
100 %

固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平，但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图）。

灰度（目标色彩空间：DCI-P3）
灰度（目标色彩空间：DCI-P3）
色彩（目标色彩空间：DCI-P3）
色彩（目标色彩空间：DCI-P3）
色彩空间（目标色彩空间：DCI-P3）
色彩空间（目标色彩空间：DCI-P3）
饱和度（目标色彩空间：DCI-P3）
饱和度（目标色彩空间：DCI-P3）

性能、排放和电池寿命

努比亚 Flip 5G 采用了 骁龙 7 代 1处理器，该处理器也用于 Razr 40.该处理器提供的性能可确保系统流畅运行，而且在努比亚预计的更新周期内应该有足够的储备。

虽然努比亚智能手机在持续高负荷运行的情况下温度会很高，但始终保持在安全范围内。即使在这种情况下，SoC 也能持续发挥其全部性能。

两个扬声器在中等音量时听起来相当不错，但随着音量的增大，它们会产生强烈的回声，听起来很空洞。

努比亚 Flip 的电池容量为 4,310 毫安时，容量相对较大，续航时间出人意料地长。这款可折叠智能手机的最大充电功率为 33 瓦--交货时随附了合适的电源适配器。为电池充电大约需要一个小时，仅 20 分钟后电池就已充满 50%。

Geekbench 6.3 | Geekbench 5.5 | PCMark for Android | 3DMark | GFXBench | Octane V2
Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
2040 Points +101%
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 3479, n=171, last 2 years)
1491 Points +47%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
1460 Points +44%
Tecno Phantom V Flip
MediaTek Dimensity 8050, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
1114 Points +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
  (1016 - 1119, n=6)
1062 Points +5%
Motorola Razr 40
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
1056 Points +4%
Nubia Flip 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
1016 Points
Multi-Core
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
5228 Points +81%
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 10401, n=171, last 2 years)
4177 Points +45%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
3799 Points +32%
Tecno Phantom V Flip
MediaTek Dimensity 8050, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
3420 Points +19%
Motorola Razr 40
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
3064 Points +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
  (2601 - 3261, n=6)
2954 Points +2%
Nubia Flip 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
2885 Points
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
1542 Points
Oppo Find N3 Flip
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
1107 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=176, last 2 years)
1037 Points
Tecno Phantom V Flip
MediaTek Dimensity 8050, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
871 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
  (775 - 826, n=4)
793 Points
Motorola Razr 40
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
775 Points
Multi-Core
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
4955 Points
Oppo Find N3 Flip
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
3494 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 8816, n=176, last 2 years)
3464 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
  (2854 - 3094, n=4)
2943 Points
Motorola Razr 40
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
2931 Points
Tecno Phantom V Flip
MediaTek Dimensity 8050, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
2925 Points
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
17002 Points +46%
Tecno Phantom V Flip
MediaTek Dimensity 8050, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
14470 Points +24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 27169, n=197, last 2 years)
13179 Points +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
  (10389 - 15189, n=7)
12330 Points +6%
Motorola Razr 40
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
12278 Points +5%
Nubia Flip 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
11666 Points
Oppo Find N3 Flip
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
9920 Points -15%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
13051 Points +114%
Average of class Smartphone
  (317 - 23762, n=163, last 2 years)
8254 Points +36%
Motorola Razr 40
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
6286 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
  (5501 - 6466, n=7)
6187 Points +2%
Nubia Flip 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
6091 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
20215 Points +193%
Average of class Smartphone
  (267 - 40163, n=163, last 2 years)
12419 Points +80%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
  (6767 - 7388, n=7)
7042 Points +2%
Motorola Razr 40
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
7002 Points +2%
Nubia Flip 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
6893 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
5825 Points +35%
Average of class Smartphone
  (877 - 10632, n=163, last 2 years)
4759 Points +10%
Motorola Razr 40
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
4629 Points +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
  (3325 - 4704, n=7)
4369 Points +1%
Nubia Flip 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
4329 Points
Wild Life Score
Tecno Phantom V Flip
MediaTek Dimensity 8050, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
4576 Points +46%
Motorola Razr 40
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
3148 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
  (3095 - 3181, n=7)
3141 Points +1%
Nubia Flip 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
3124 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (408 - 13896, n=112, last 2 years)
2823 Points -10%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Oppo Find N3 Flip
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
12831 Points +309%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
9805 Points +213%
Average of class Smartphone
  (413 - 25785, n=188, last 2 years)
7929 Points +153%
Tecno Phantom V Flip
MediaTek Dimensity 8050, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
4561 Points +45%
Motorola Razr 40
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
3143 Points 0%
Nubia Flip 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
3136 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
  (3035 - 3184, n=7)
3133 Points 0%
Wild Life Extreme
Oppo Find N3 Flip
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
3116 Points +280%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
3090 Points +277%
Average of class Smartphone
  (114 - 7094, n=195, last 2 years)
2172 Points +165%
Tecno Phantom V Flip
MediaTek Dimensity 8050, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
1315 Points +61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
  (819 - 854, n=7)
832 Points +2%
Motorola Razr 40
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
830 Points +1%
Nubia Flip 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
819 Points
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
3496 Points +324%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
3454 Points +319%
Average of class Smartphone
  (112 - 7212, n=193, last 2 years)
2166 Points +163%
Tecno Phantom V Flip
MediaTek Dimensity 8050, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
1289 Points +56%
Motorola Razr 40
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
833 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
  (825 - 854, n=7)
832 Points +1%
Nubia Flip 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
825 Points
Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (2799 - 13318, n=59, last 2 years)
7085 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
5563 Points
Oppo Find N3 Flip
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
5530 Points
Solar Bay Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (3223 - 13244, n=59, last 2 years)
7021 Points
Oppo Find N3 Flip
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
5532 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
5414 Points
GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
88 fps +203%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
60 fps +107%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.6 - 166, n=207, last 2 years)
50.7 fps +75%
Tecno Phantom V Flip
MediaTek Dimensity 8050, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
41 fps +41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
  (28 - 39, n=7)
33.4 fps +15%
Motorola Razr 40
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
33 fps +14%
Nubia Flip 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
29 fps
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Oppo Find N3 Flip
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
101 fps +120%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.3 - 321, n=207, last 2 years)
84.9 fps +85%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
84 fps +83%
Tecno Phantom V Flip
MediaTek Dimensity 8050, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
48 fps +4%
Nubia Flip 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
46 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
  (41 - 49, n=7)
45.3 fps -2%
Motorola Razr 40
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
41 fps -11%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
88 fps +389%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
59 fps +228%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 144, n=207, last 2 years)
38.9 fps +116%
Tecno Phantom V Flip
MediaTek Dimensity 8050, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
30 fps +67%
Motorola Razr 40
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
21 fps +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
  (18 - 24, n=7)
20.9 fps +16%
Nubia Flip 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
18 fps
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
52 fps +206%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
42 fps +147%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 129, n=207, last 2 years)
34 fps +100%
Tecno Phantom V Flip
MediaTek Dimensity 8050, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
22 fps +29%
Nubia Flip 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
17 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
  (15 - 18, n=7)
16.4 fps -4%
Motorola Razr 40
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
15 fps -12%
3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
32 fps +327%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
20 fps +167%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.38 - 53, n=207, last 2 years)
15.9 fps +112%
Tecno Phantom V Flip
MediaTek Dimensity 8050, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
9.6 fps +28%
Nubia Flip 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
7.5 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
  (7 - 7.9, n=7)
7.41 fps -1%
Motorola Razr 40
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
7 fps -7%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
55459 Points +152%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
45823 Points +108%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years)
38550 Points +75%
Motorola Razr 40
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
34300 Points +56%
Tecno Phantom V Flip
MediaTek Dimensity 8050, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
34016 Points +54%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
  (21143 - 34866, n=7)
28984 Points +31%
Nubia Flip 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
22047 Points
Nubia Flip 5GOppo Find N3 FlipTecno Phantom V FlipSamsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5GMotorola Razr 40Average 256 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
181%
40%
119%
0%
-13%
49%
Sequential Read 256KB
967.4
3794
292%
1814.9
88%
3412.35
253%
955.8
-1%
887 ?(482 - 1009, n=32)
-8%
1887 ?(226 - 4512, n=198, last 2 years)
95%
Sequential Write 256KB
766.69
2965
287%
1490.7
94%
2289.61
199%
804.3
5%
694 ?(369 - 913, n=32)
-9%
1471 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=198, last 2 years)
92%
Random Read 4KB
263.87
411
56%
249.9
-5%
444.6
68%
290.8
10%
228 ?(99.7 - 291, n=32)
-14%
278 ?(22.2 - 483, n=198, last 2 years)
5%
Random Write 4KB
295.55
558
89%
238.9
-19%
161.87
-45%
257.5
-13%
238 ?(99.2 - 319, n=32)
-19%
311 ?(9.4 - 753, n=198, last 2 years)
5%

温度

Max. Load
 47.7 °C47.6 °C32.5 °C 
 47.2 °C47.7 °C32.7 °C 
 44 °C45 °C32.6 °C 
Maximum: 47.7 °C
Average: 41.9 °C
31.3 °C42.8 °C41.9 °C
31.4 °C43.4 °C41.3 °C
30.9 °C41.1 °C41.2 °C
Maximum: 43.4 °C
Average: 38.4 °C
Power Supply (max.)  29.3 °C | Room Temperature 21.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.9 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47.7 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.4 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.2 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.


3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

0510152025303540455055606570Tooltip
Nubia Flip 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø4.96 (4.91-4.98)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø9.61 (7.69-22.1)
Motorola Razr 40 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø4.65 (4.22-4.97)
Nubia Flip 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø18.8 (18.7-18.8)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 1.1.0.2: Ø33.8 (28.3-73.9)
Motorola Razr 40 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø17.3 (15.2-18.8)

发言人

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.936.92532.428.33128.1264031.330.45029.330.56321.927.58017.630.310025.130.912516.73216017.644.220017.744.125014.851.231512.256.140011.160.450012.466.663011.669.880012.271.510001474.8125012.875.6160012.875200012.876.3250013.580.2315013.581.1400014.481.5500014.180.8630013.674.4800013.567.31000013.659.51250014.260.81600013.853.8SPL25.589.5N0.774.2median 13.6median 69.8Delta1.210.630.936.222.328.623.227.325.43031.132.8202917.830.117.53117.338.31551.715.153.616.356.213.561.513.963.913.46813.368.211.7711473.31475.213.377.41378.713.580.914.381.313.480.314.778.413.676.214.173.8147014.268.113.864.625.889.60.777.1median 14median 710.79.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseNubia Flip 5GSamsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Nubia Flip 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 59% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

运行时间

Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
Average of class Smartphone
  (476 - 3244, n=209, last 2 years)
991 min +4%
Nubia Flip 5G
4310 mAh
951 min
Oppo Find N3 Flip
4300 mAh
857 min -10%
Motorola Razr 40
4200 mAh
743 min -22%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
3700 mAh
647 min -32%
Tecno Phantom V Flip
4000 mAh
598 min -37%
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 124)
15h 51min

Pros

+ 电池寿命长
+ 明亮准确的显示屏
+ 6 千兆赫无线局域网

Cons

- 更新时间短
- 相当厚重
- 既没有超广角镜头，也没有变焦镜头

结论--努比亚 Flip 5G 功能上的差距

努比亚 Flip 5G 评测。努比亚提供的测试设备。(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）
努比亚 Flip 5G 评测。努比亚提供的测试设备。(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）

努比亚 Flip 5G 电池续航时间长，显示效果出色，因此卖点十足。Wi-Fi 6E 在这个价位的手机中仍属罕见，其主摄像头的拍摄效果也不错。

努比亚 Flip 5G 是一款不错的可折叠智能手机，但就其价格而言，有时显得过于纤薄。

另一方面，Flip 也不得不面对一些批评。例如，它只支持几种 HDR 标准，而且不支持 eSIM。我们还希望能增加一个超广角镜头或光学变焦镜头。它的更新周期也很短。

499 美元或 699 美元的价格乍听之下非常诱人，但存储空间更大的 Galaxy Z Flip 5并没有贵很多，而且 Flip 4甚至更便宜。即使是 Razr 40现在也不到 700 美元。

价格和供应情况

努比亚 Flip 5G 可直接从制造商的网站上购买。售价 499 美元起。

Nubia Flip 5G - 06/17/2024 v7 (old)
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
80%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
89%
Connectivity
52 / 70 → 75%
Weight
88%
Battery
91%
Display
95%
Games Performance
61 / 64 → 96%
Application Performance
80 / 86 → 93%
Temperature
86%
Noise
100%
Audio
76 / 90 → 85%
Camera
67%
Average
79%
85%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

More articles related to this device

Nubia Flip 5G (Flip Series)
News
•
努比亚 Flip 5G：三星Galaxy Z Flip 的替...

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 努比亚 Flip 5G 评测--配备出色显示屏的经济型翻盖手机
Daniel Schmidt, 2024-05-23 (Update: 2024-05-23)