Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Magyar三星Galaxy Z Flip4 5G评测--一个紧凑的可折叠智能手机，有挥之不去的问题
与 折叠4一样，今年的Flip机型依靠的是 骁龙8+ Gen 1.Flip4的主要可折叠显示屏的屏幕尺寸为6.7英寸，分辨率为1080p，另外还有一个1.9英寸的外部屏幕。
基本型配有128GB的内部存储器，建议零售价为999.99美元，而配有512GB的顶级型号则为1179.99美元。Bespoke版仅在三星商店有售，它提供了通过不同的前后面板以及不同颜色的框架来个性化你的Flip4的外观的机会（1319.99美元）。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 87.9 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2022 | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730 | 187 g | 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.70" | 2640x1080 | |
| 86.3 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2021 | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G SD 888 5G, Adreno 660 | 183 g | 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.70" | 2640x1080 | |
| 86.1 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2022 | Huawei P50 Pocket SD 888 4G, Adreno 660 | 190 g | 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.90" | 2790x1188 | |
| 88.6 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2022 | Asus Zenfone 9 SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730 | 169 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 5.90" | 2400x1080 | |
| 89.3 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2022 | Samsung Galaxy S22 Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920 | 167 g | 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.10" | 2340x1080 |
外壳 - 三星智能手机，有一个冲孔
特点 -Galaxy Z Flip4配备了UFS存储空间
3,700毫安时的电池通过一个USB 2.0 Type-C接口充电，可以通过USB-OTG识别外部外设。还支持通过Miracast无线传输到外部显示器。
Flip4中没有microSD卡插槽。然而，这款双SIM卡智能手机有一个NFC芯片，用于三星和谷歌支付，以及蓝牙5.2。
软件 - Flip4带有Android 12
像往常一样，三星将Android 与自己的用户界面OneUI版本4配对。在这次审查时，后者是OneUI 4.1.1，仍有2022年7月的安全补丁。在最好的情况下，Flip4将收到更新，直到Android 16，因为Galaxy Z家族应该享有长达四代的操作系统更新和五年的安全补丁。
通信和GNSS - 具有5G功能的三星智能手机
这款三星可折叠式产品在家庭网络内的数据传输率相当高，但WiFi模块只在2.4和5GHz范围内与我们的华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000参考路由器进行通信。Flip4无法达到Fold4的WiFi 6E（理论上）所能达到的高速度。
访问LTE网络，包括各种支持的4G频率，是有保证的，而且还可以使用快速的5G频谱。与它的前辈一样，在德国可用的快速毫米波标准，不幸的是，Flip4可以使用。
| Networking | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Asus Zenfone 9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G | |
| Huawei P50 Pocket | |
| Samsung Galaxy S22 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (34.8 - 1875, n=184, last 2 years) | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| Asus Zenfone 9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G | |
| Huawei P50 Pocket | |
| Samsung Galaxy S22 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (40.5 - 1810, n=186, last 2 years) | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Asus Zenfone 9 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (229 - 1902, n=75, last 2 years) | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Asus Zenfone 9 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (668 - 1864, n=75, last 2 years) | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G | |
我们通过实际的骑行测试来检验位置跟踪的准确性。我们的短途旅行是用Garmin Venu2作为对比设备平行记录的。Flip4偶尔会缩短曲线，尽管GPS结果的变化仍然相当小。不像 折叠4然而，Flip型号只使用单频GPS。
电话和通话质量--双SIM卡的三星手机
Flip4的通话质量并不突兀。声音非常清晰地传来，在线路的另一端被描述为非常清晰。还支持eSIM、WiFi通话和VoLTE。在我们的测试中，通过内置的前置摄像头与Skype进行视频通话是没有问题的，而且由于采用了柔性模式，不需要支架。
照相机 -Galaxy Z Flip4，带双摄像头
由于Flip4的可折叠外形，可以使用主摄像头拍摄照片和视频。内置的1000万像素摄像头在自拍时也非常稳定，但拍出来的照片有点苍白，而且往往有点曝光过度。
背面的双摄像头设置配备了两个传感器，分辨率分别为1200万像素，不过光学图像稳定功能只在广角镜头上提供。Flip4的新相机传感器来自于Fold3的传感器，应该比Z Flip3 5G上的传感器要亮65%。 Galaxy Z Flip3 5G.三星的小型折叠机仍然不是处理低光的专家，尽管在低光情况下的照片和视频比其前辈拍摄的照片略好。在白天用广角镜头拍摄的照片在我们看来很不错。我们用ColorChecker Passport进行的分析也证实，该手机的摄像头具有非常合理的色彩保真度，但绿色调除外。
在我们看来，Flip4的1200万像素超广角摄像头可以更清晰地显示物体，并提供更多细节。不幸的是，这款三星手机缺乏8K视频选项。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain cameraUltra wide-angleZoom 5xLow Light
配件和保修 - Flip4没有电源适配器
三星没有为其可折叠智能手机提供电源适配器，尽管它提供了一条USB线和信息手册。
保修期为自购买之日起24个月。 三星Care+再次包含在购买时，为期一年，在此期间只限于一次索赔。
输入设备和操作 - 带有FaceUnlock的三星智能手机
Flip4得益于清晰的振动马达，在操作过程中120赫兹的主屏幕的高刷新率，以及1.9英寸的外部显示器，它与Flip3的相似，以60赫兹运行。前面的小屏幕也可以用来用主摄像头拍照，由于新的快速拍摄功能，拍照效果得到了改善。通知可以在小屏幕上查看，但不能发送回复。
内置在电源按钮上的指纹传感器反应迅速，能准确识别注册的指纹。然而，位置太高了，导致解锁Flip4时的握持感很尴尬。在解锁手机时，通过人脸识别进行生物识别，也可以通过冲孔摄像头实现。
显示器 -Galaxy Z Flip4 with AMOLED
Flip4的可折叠6.7英寸LTPO-AMOLED显示屏具有22:9的纵横比，自适应刷新率为10至120赫兹，分辨率为2640 x 1080像素，这意味着该手机的像素密度很高，超过400PPI。然而，看一下开发者设置就会发现，屏幕只降到最低的24赫兹。由于Fold4也同样受到影响，我们推测这是由三星的一个内置软件限制造成的。
最大屏幕亮度很好，平均为800cd/m²，但 Galaxy Z Flip3在我们的测量中实现了一个略高的数值。更加现实的APL18水平也略低于其前辈的1093cd/m²。
像所有OLED一样，这款三星手机的屏幕也会闪烁。在最低亮度水平下，显示屏的恒定PWM为120赫兹，在此之上，振幅曲线为240赫兹，但就像永久直流调光一样稳定。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 795 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.37
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G Dynamic AMOLED , 2640x1080, 6.7" | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G AMOLED, 2640x1080, 6.7" | Huawei P50 Pocket Foldable OLED, 2790x1188, 6.9" | Asus Zenfone 9 AMOLED , 2400x1080, 5.9" | Samsung Galaxy S22 AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.1" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -18% | -8% | -30% | -22% | |
| Brightness middle | 795 | 832 5% | 780 -2% | 793 0% | 853 7% |
| Brightness | 800 | 842 5% | 768 -4% | 796 0% | 858 7% |
| Brightness Distribution | 97 | 97 0% | 96 -1% | 97 0% | 96 -1% |
| Black Level * | |||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1 | 1.9 -90% | 1.1 -10% | 1.9 -90% | 1.9 -90% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.5 | 3.3 -32% | 3.1 -24% | 3.4 -36% | 3.2 -28% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.5 | 1.4 7% | 1.6 -7% | 2.3 -53% | 1.9 -27% |
| Gamma | 2.37 93% | 2.1 105% | 2.23 99% | 2.26 97% | 2.07 106% |
| CCT | 6466 101% | 6453 101% | 6483 100% | 6860 95% | 6460 101% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 120 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
在设定的变焦水平下，使用不同的亮度设置进行的一系列测量
在我们用CalMAN软件和分光光度计进行的测试中，手机的OLED显示屏似乎得到了很好的校准--不过，在洋红色区域可以看到轻微的偏差。DeltaE值在理想范围内（<3），色温在6,500K左右，非常准确。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1.52 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.7865 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.7325 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 1.41 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.7205 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.687 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
日光对Flip4不构成任何问题--至少在主显示屏方面是这样。在屏幕保护膜上可以看到令人不安的反射，但反射只是稍微限制了可读性，而且是在阳光直射下。另一方面，小的外部面板在户外不太容易阅读；我们在测试中不得不寻找阴凉处来阅读外部面板，或者用另一只手主动遮挡面板。
由于内置OLED技术，主屏幕和外屏幕的可视角度都非常好。
性能 - 采用高通SoC的Flip4
在日常使用中，Flip4的运行非常流畅，几乎没有打嗝，这要归功于 骁龙8+第一代.系统性能非常好，应用程序的加载时间也很短。在我们的基准测试中，高通SoC真正展示了其出色的性能，但三星手机的表现略低于 华硕Zenfone 9.
| CrossMark - Overall | |
| Asus Zenfone 9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (749 - 1178, n=23) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S22 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (187 - 1517, n=157, last 2 years) | |
| UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G | |
| Asus Zenfone 9 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (3291 - 84787, n=21) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (1267 - 74958, n=143, last 2 years) | |
| AImark - Score v2.x | |
| Asus Zenfone 9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy S22 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (1043 - 7865, n=11) | |
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G | |
| Asus Zenfone 9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S22 | |
| Huawei P50 Pocket | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G | |
| Wild Life Extreme | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G | |
| Asus Zenfone 9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S22 | |
| Huawei P50 Pocket | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G | |
| Wild Life Unlimited Score | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G | |
| Asus Zenfone 9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S22 | |
| Huawei P50 Pocket | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G | |
| Wild Life Score | |
| Samsung Galaxy S22 | |
| Huawei P50 Pocket | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen | |
| Asus Zenfone 9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S22 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G | |
| Huawei P50 Pocket | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen | |
| Asus Zenfone 9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy S22 | |
| Huawei P50 Pocket | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
| Samsung Galaxy S22 | |
| Asus Zenfone 9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G | |
| Huawei P50 Pocket | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy S22 | |
| Asus Zenfone 9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G | |
| Huawei P50 Pocket | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy S22 | |
| Asus Zenfone 9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G | |
| Huawei P50 Pocket | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy S22 | |
| Asus Zenfone 9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G | |
| Huawei P50 Pocket | |
| GFXBench | |
| on screen Car Chase Onscreen | |
| Asus Zenfone 9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S22 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G | |
| Huawei P50 Pocket | |
| 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | |
| Asus Zenfone 9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S22 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G | |
| Huawei P50 Pocket | |
| on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
| Asus Zenfone 9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy S22 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G | |
| Huawei P50 Pocket | |
| 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
| Asus Zenfone 9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy S22 | |
| Huawei P50 Pocket | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G | |
| on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
| Asus Zenfone 9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S22 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G | |
| Huawei P50 Pocket | |
| 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
| Asus Zenfone 9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy S22 | |
| Huawei P50 Pocket | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G | |
| Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G (Chrome 105) | |
| Asus Zenfone 9 (Chrome 104) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (76.2 - 204, n=23) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=161, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S22 (Chrome 100.0.4896.79) | |
| Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
| Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (69.1 - 196, n=18) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S22 (Chrome 100.0.4896.79) | |
| Asus Zenfone 9 | |
| WebXPRT 4 - Overall | |
| Asus Zenfone 9 (Chrome 104) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G (chrome 105) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (69 - 159, n=21) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=152, last 2 years) | |
| WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
| Asus Zenfone 9 (Chrome 104) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (106 - 224, n=14) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G (Chrome 93) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S22 (Chrome 100.0.4896.79) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei P50 Pocket (Huawei Browser 11.1) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Asus Zenfone 9 (Chrome 104) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G (Chrome 105) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (17622 - 61536, n=24) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S22 (Chrome 100.0.4896.79) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G (Chrome 93) | |
| Huawei P50 Pocket (Huawei Browser 11.1) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Huawei P50 Pocket (Huawei Browser 11.1) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S22 (Chrome 100.0.4896.79) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (665 - 1707, n=22) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G (Chrome 93) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G (Chrome 105) | |
| Asus Zenfone 9 (Chrome 104) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G | Huawei P50 Pocket | Asus Zenfone 9 | Samsung Galaxy S22 | Average 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -8% | -1% | 41% | -3% | -11% | 19% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 1598.77 | 1620 1% | 1839 15% | 1986.97 24% | 1486 -7% | 1600 ? 0% | 1839 ? 15% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 987.09 | 750 -24% | 575 -42% | 1776.21 80% | 993 1% | 756 ? -23% | 1425 ? 44% |
| Random Read 4KB | 308.23 | 276.6 -10% | 263.5 -15% | 298.46 -3% | 273 -11% | 244 ? -21% | 277 ? -10% |
| Random Write 4KB | 245.94 | 250.6 2% | 342.1 39% | 398.39 62% | 257.6 5% | 243 ? -1% | 309 ? 26% |
排放 - 三星手机保持凉爽
温度
Flip4的外壳只是在负载下略有升温。尽管如此，这款手机在3DMark压力测试中显示出强烈的性能下降。我们在测试中没有观察到系统过热的情况，尽管我们确实注意到有超过50%的节流。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.4 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.7 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.4 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
3DMark Wild Life Stress Test
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G | |
| Huawei P50 Pocket | |
| Samsung Galaxy S22 | |
| Asus Zenfone 9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G | |
| Huawei P50 Pocket | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy S22 | |
| Asus Zenfone 9 | |
发言人
与它的前辈相比，扬声器的变化不大。 前代产品.与Flip4的薄型设计相比，这两个扬声器非常好，尽管高音部分有点下降。然而，中音在音频频谱中是相当线性的。
对于那些想要无线声音的人，可以使用蓝牙编解码器SBC、AAC、aptX和LDAC。有线耳机解决方案可以通过USB-C端口实现。
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电池寿命 - 三星Galaxy Z Flip4 5G智能手机
消耗功率
| Off / Standby |   0.1 / 0.29 Watt |
| Idle |  0.56 / 0.71 / 0.79 Watt |
| Load |
3.59 / 6.45 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G 3700 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G 3300 mAh | Huawei P50 Pocket 4000 mAh | Asus Zenfone 9 4300 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S22 3700 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -2% | -97% | -39% | -56% | -96% | -80% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.56 | 0.46 18% | 1.33 -138% | 1.01 -80% | 0.69 -23% | 1.006 ? -80% | 0.894 ? -60% |
| Idle Average * | 0.71 | 0.74 -4% | 1.77 -149% | 1.1 -55% | 1.19 -68% | 1.834 ? -158% | 1.456 ? -105% |
| Idle Maximum * | 0.79 | 0.78 1% | 1.89 -139% | 1.17 -48% | 1.26 -59% | 1.984 ? -151% | 1.616 ? -105% |
| Load Average * | 3.59 | 4.73 -32% | 4.25 -18% | 3.3 8% | 6.97 -94% | 5.68 ? -58% | 6.45 ? -80% |
| Load Maximum * | 6.45 | 5.89 9% | 9.19 -42% | 7.89 -22% | 8.85 -37% | 8.44 ? -31% | 9.8 ? -52% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)
电池寿命
在我们的实际WiFi测试中，在调整了150cd/m²的显示亮度后，电池寿命非常不同。虽然Flip4的续航时间（8小时56分钟）与Flip3的续航时间几乎相同。 浏览器的Flip3在使用三星自己的浏览器时，我们测得的续航时间明显比使用Chrome浏览器时好11小时。这些运行时间可能由于自适应刷新率的不同而不同，但我们在浏览器脚本中看不到赫兹值的任何差异。
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G 3700 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G 3300 mAh | Huawei P50 Pocket 4000 mAh | Asus Zenfone 9 4300 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S22 3700 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | |||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 657 | 541 -18% | 482 -27% | 825 26% | 675 3% |
Pros
Cons
判决书
由于其折叠后的小尺寸，Galaxy Z Flip4是一个非常有趣的替代较小的标准手机，如 华硕Zenfone 9或三星自己的 Galaxy S22.这款手机壳给人留下了很好的印象，而且性能也很好。 由于采用了骁龙8+1代，与高质量的加工和漂亮的可折叠OLED显示屏一样有吸引力。然而，有点令人失望的是，相对于Flip3来说，亮度较低。我们本来希望在这方面能有类似于Fold4的升级。
鉴于Flip4极具竞争力的价格，任何真正喜欢折叠机制的人都应该仔细看看这款三星折叠机。
我们不得不再次对三星的按键位置提出批评，这些按键仍然太高了--即使是手大的人也会发现用正常的握法不可能够到指纹识别器，这成为每天的挫败感。与Fold系列相比，缓慢的USB连接和限制（不支持笔的使用，没有双频GPS，没有WiFi 6E，也没有UWB）也很明显。
前代产品的最大弱点，即有限的电池寿命，似乎已经被三星解决了--至少部分解决了。电力用户仍然无法在一次充电中度过一天，考虑到缓慢的快充技术，这尤其成问题。
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 5G
- 09/30/2022 v7 (old)
Marcus Herbrich
Price comparison
