诺基亚G22智能手机评测--中档手机可自行维修
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
78.7 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2023 | Nokia G22 T7200, Mali-G57 MP1 | 195 g | 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.52" | 1600x720 | |
78.5 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2022 | Nokia G21 T7200, Mali-G57 MP1 | 190 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.50" | 1600x720 | |
79 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2023 | Motorola Moto G23 Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2 | 184.3 g | 128 GB eMMC Flash | 6.50" | 1600x720 | |
76.6 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2023 | Xiaomi Redmi 12C Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2 | 192 g | 128 GB eMMC Flash | 6.71" | 1650x720 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳和功能--诺基亚G22的良好维修性?
诺基亚手机已经很久没有配备充电器了,充电器的销售收入被捐赠给了环境保护。在诺基亚的网上商店购买可以植树,而且设备被提供较长的保修期,或以订购的方式出售,以便你可以尽可能长时间地使用它们。
现在,制造商在可持续发展方面迈出了下一步:诺基亚G22的背面完全由可回收的塑料制成,并且与iFixit合作销售维修套件,允许更换有缺陷的部件,如屏幕或电池。
幸运的是,更换部件的成本并不高:50欧元一个新显示屏,25欧元一个新电池。诺基亚向我们提供了iFixit的工具集,我们立即尝试打开诺基亚G22。要做到这一点,你必须撬开SIM卡槽的侧边框,这很成功,但即使用软塑料镐也会在外壳上留下痕迹。拆开外壳也很费劲。诺基亚必须在这里做得更多,以减少未来自我维修的障碍。
外壳本身主要由塑料制成,看起来很坚固,手感也不错。前面的压力确实会传到屏幕上,但总的来说,外壳几乎不能被扭曲,只有轻微的凹陷。蓝色和深灰色在欧洲销售,国际上还有一个棕色的版本。
乍一看,诺基亚的G22并没有特别好的装备,对于一款价格为200欧元的手机来说,它有64GB的大容量存储,但内存类型是快速的UFS 2.2闪存。microSD读卡器占据了一个SIM卡槽,事实证明,结合我们的参考卡Angelbird V60,它的速度与同类智能手机相似。
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Average of class Smartphone (7.7 - 77, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Motorola Moto G23 (Angelbird V60) | |
Nokia G21 (Angelbird V60) | |
Nokia G22 (Angelbird V60) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 12C (Angelbird V60) |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
通信、软件和操作 - 迅捷的触摸屏
作为一款WiFi-5智能手机,诺基亚的G22在WLAN速度方面与竞争对手不相上下。除了在达到全速之前有一定的启动时间外,传输速度也相当稳定。
不幸的是,诺基亚的G22只是一款4G手机,但在这个价格范围内是可以接受的。为了进一步出国旅行,你应该仔细检查智能手机是否支持必要的频率,以便能够在本地访问移动互联网。
诺基亚安装了相当纯粹的Android 12,并承诺每月进行安全更新,但在测试时,补丁是从2023年3月开始的,我们也看到,该制造商的其他设备往往每月有2-3次更新。该设备应该在上市后3年内进行更新,Android 13和14应该可以用于该手机。不幸的是,一些带有广告的第三方应用程序被预装,但它们可以很容易地被删除。
触摸屏对我们的输入反应迅速,由于90赫兹的帧率,滚动相当流畅。用于解锁设备的指纹传感器位于右侧的待机按钮上。对于右撇子来说,它比左撇子更容易触及。
它能非常可靠地识别存储的指纹,但要等一会儿才能真正解锁手机。也可以使用人脸识别,即使在较弱的光线下,屏幕的亮度通常也足以识别。然而,由于是纯粹的软件解决方案,这种方法在防止操纵方面并不十分安全。
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Motorola Moto G23 | |
Xiaomi Redmi 12C | |
Nokia G22 | |
Nokia G21 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Motorola Moto G23 | |
Nokia G22 | |
Nokia G21 | |
Xiaomi Redmi 12C |
照相机 - 诺基亚G22,5000万像素
诺基亚的G22背面有一个5000万像素的摄像头,另外还有一个分辨率很低的微距摄像头和一个不能拍照的虚化效果镜头的支持。主摄像头在白天拍摄的照片还不错,但在清晰度和细节方面无法与高端手机竞争。
在非常低的光线和高对比度下,合格的照片是成功的,但在非常明亮和非常黑暗的地区,它们不再显示任何画质。在1勒克斯照度下拍摄的照片只显示了测试图中非常明亮的区域。在演播室灯光下,这款手机能够管理一个体面的,尽管有些冲淡的图像质量。
视频可以以1080p和30帧的速度录制。自动对焦在这里有点慢,但曝光补偿工作迅速而可靠。总的来说,电影记录看起来是可用的,但不能满足更高要求。
前置摄像头的分辨率为800万像素。自拍第一眼看上去很不错,但不应该放大太多,否则,你会注意到强烈的颗粒感和黑暗区域的细节不足。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain cameraLowLight显示屏 - 诺基亚G22的明亮IPS屏幕
诺基亚G22的6.52英寸显示屏的分辨率为1600 x 720像素,因此与同类产品相当。然而,它的亮度显然高于该价格范围内的通常比率。我们测量了641cd/m²,所以这款手机在明亮的日子里也可以在户外使用。
明亮的屏幕和可接受的黑值也导致了良好的对比度,这导致了屏幕上更强的色彩表现。只是在明亮的红色中,颜色的准确性稍差,在明亮的灰色中也有明显的偏蓝。
我们没有注意到任何PWM,但由于响应时间较慢,该显示器很难适合要求较高的游戏者。
|
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 674 cd/m²
Contrast: 1567:1 (Black: 0.43 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.45 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 5.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
94.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.072
Nokia G22 IPS, 1600x720, 6.5" | Nokia G21 IPS, 1600x720, 6.5" | Motorola Moto G23 IPS, 1600x720, 6.5" | Xiaomi Redmi 12C IPS, 1650x720, 6.7" | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Response Times | -15% | 17% | 22% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 60.2 ? | 64 ? -6% | 46 ? 24% | 49.5 ? 18% |
Response Time Black / White * | 27.7 ? | 34 ? -23% | 25 ? 10% | 20.9 ? 25% |
PWM Frequency | ||||
Screen | -24% | -13% | -9% | |
Brightness middle | 674 | 492 -27% | 522 -23% | 417 -38% |
Brightness | 641 | 484 -24% | 502 -22% | 397 -38% |
Brightness Distribution | 90 | 86 -4% | 91 1% | 85 -6% |
Black Level * | 0.43 | 0.46 -7% | 0.47 -9% | 0.35 19% |
Contrast | 1567 | 1070 -32% | 1111 -29% | 1191 -24% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.45 | 6.02 -35% | 4.63 -4% | 3.81 14% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.41 | 9.13 -23% | 8.59 -16% | 7.2 3% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.1 | 7.1 -39% | 5.2 -2% | 5.2 -2% |
Gamma | 2.072 106% | 2.345 94% | 2.296 96% | 2.531 87% |
CCT | 7799 83% | 8918 73% | 7832 83% | 7842 83% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -20% /
-22% | 2% /
-7% | 7% /
-3% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
27.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17.9 ms rise | |
↘ 9.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
60.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 33 ms rise | |
↘ 27.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 96 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8738 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
性能、排放和电池寿命 - 较早的SoC,具有良好的功率
使用 宇宙飞船T606诺基亚使用与前代产品相同的SoC 诺基亚G21.它在性能上仍能跟上其他设备的步伐,能够实现合理的流畅操作,对大多数日常应用来说是足够的。就面向未来而言,诺基亚应该为其下一款中档手机选择更先进的SoC。
我们喜欢快速的UFS 2.2存储,它大大缩短了复制和加载时间,使诺基亚G22在其价格范围内具有明显优势。
长时间加载后,44.7℃的最高温度在室温条件下是明显的,但不是关键。长时间和高负荷后约3%的性能损失在日常使用中几乎不明显。
下部边缘的扬声器听起来还不错,音乐不会过度膨胀,也不会显得高音太重。在嘈杂的环境中,你可以将音量提高到100%以上,但声音会变得非常单薄。耳机或扬声器可以通过3.5毫米接口连接,或通过蓝牙无线连接。在蓝牙编解码方面,诺基亚的G22标配aptX、aptX HD、SBC、AAC和LDAC。不过,更多现代的变体还没有出现。
5050毫安时的电池与前代产品的尺寸完全相同,但诺基亚G22在我们的Wi-Fi测试中持续的时间少了几分钟。然而,17:32小时是一个很好的结果,这款手机甚至可以在不充电的情况下度过两个工作日。这款智能手机可以用最大的20瓦特充电,然后最多需要2小时,直到电池指示灯再次显示100%。
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 | |
Average of class Smartphone (4609 - 24088, n=191, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 12C | |
Motorola Moto G23 | |
Nokia G21 | |
Average Unisoc T7200 (6637 - 8303, n=19) | |
Nokia G22 |
GFXBench | |
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 247, n=202, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 12C | |
Motorola Moto G23 | |
Nokia G22 | |
Nokia G21 | |
Average Unisoc T7200 (5.1 - 11, n=18) | |
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 261, n=202, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 12C | |
Motorola Moto G23 | |
Nokia G22 | |
Average Unisoc T7200 (1.9 - 5.5, n=18) | |
Nokia G21 | |
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 119, n=202, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 12C | |
Motorola Moto G23 | |
Nokia G22 | |
Nokia G21 | |
Average Unisoc T7200 (0.85 - 7.3, n=18) | |
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 104, n=202, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 12C | |
Motorola Moto G23 | |
Nokia G21 | |
Nokia G22 | |
Average Unisoc T7200 (0.85 - 2.1, n=18) | |
3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Average of class Smartphone (0.38 - 46, n=202, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 12C | |
Motorola Moto G23 | |
Average Unisoc T7200 (0.8 - 6.6, n=14) | |
Nokia G22 |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years) | |
Motorola Moto G23 | |
Xiaomi Redmi 12C | |
Average Unisoc T7200 (2228 - 13455, n=14) | |
Nokia G22 |
Nokia G22 | Nokia G21 | Motorola Moto G23 | Xiaomi Redmi 12C | Average 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -58% | -42% | -37% | 5% | 148% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 881 | 257.6 -71% | 282.4 -68% | 290.6 -67% | 770 ? -13% | 1847 ? 110% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 367 | 180.6 -51% | 244.6 -33% | 225.1 -39% | 399 ? 9% | 1436 ? 291% |
Random Read 4KB | 131 | 74 -44% | 100.2 -24% | 112.9 -14% | 156.6 ? 20% | 277 ? 111% |
Random Write 4KB | 172 | 60.2 -65% | 100.5 -42% | 123.7 -28% | 177.7 ? 3% | 308 ? 79% |
温度
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.4 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.7 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.3 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
3DMark - Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
Xiaomi Redmi 12C | |
Motorola Moto G23 | |
Nokia G22 |
演讲者
Nokia G22 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi Redmi 12C audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电池寿命
Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing | |
Motorola Moto G23 | |
Nokia G21 | |
Nokia G22 | |
Average of class Smartphone (476 - 3244, n=204, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 12C |
Pros
Cons
评语 - 不错,但还不完美
诺基亚一直在思考如何使其产品更具可持续性,这一点值得称赞。特别是相对便宜的智能手机在这里需要创造性。
诺基亚的G22无疑是朝这个方向迈出的另一步,尽管它可能不会完全消除没有经验的用户对打开设备的恐惧。修理仍然有点太复杂,而且会太容易损坏手机。
令人遗憾的是,在安全更新方面的承诺并没有完全兑现。老式的SoC仍能很好地跟上,加上快速的内存,确保了系统基本流畅。屏幕也提供了大量的亮度和良好的对比度。
体面的电池运行时间、可用的扬声器和稳定的Wi-Fi速度也是这款可持续智能手机的加分项。
诺基亚的G22是一款坚实的中档手机,具有快速的内存,在可持续发展方面付出了很多努力。然而,它仍然需要一些微调,然后才能真正轻松地修复一部廉价手机。
前代产品 诺基亚G21现在以低价出售(例如155欧元,在amazon.de),也提供良好的运行时间,但也有一个不太明亮的显示屏。这款手机 摩托罗拉Moto G23带来了大量的内存,一个额外的广角摄像头,以及许多蓝牙编解码器。
Nokia G22
- 05/02/2023 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.