Notebookcheck Logo

诺基亚G22智能手机评测--中档手机可自行维修

绿波。

制造商希望通过诺基亚G22变得更加可持续:由可回收塑料制成的零部件和良好的可维修性应该会有所帮助。你可以了解这款中档手机在日常使用中的表现以及我们在测试中的改进建议。
Android ARM Smartphone
诺基亚G22
Nokia G22 (G Series)
Processor
Unisoc T7200 8 x 1.6 GHz, Cortex-A75 / A55
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-G57 MP1
Memory
4 GB 
Display
6.52 inch 20:9, 1600 x 720 pixel 269 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS, glossy: yes, 90 Hz
Storage
64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 64 GB 
, 50 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5mm audio port, Card Reader: microSD (shared, up to 2TB) , 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, proximity sensor
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B3/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B20/​B28/​B38/​B40/​B41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.5 x 165 x 76.2
Battery
5050 mAh Lithium-Ion, 20 Watt charging
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix f/​1.8, phase comparison-AF, LED-flash, Videos @1080p/​30fps (Camera 1); 2.0MP, macro lens (Camera 2); 2.0MP, depth of field (Camera 3)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/​2.0, Videos @1080p/​30fps
Additional features
Speakers: mono speaker, USB cable, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, SAR: 0.512W/​kg Head, 1.583W/​kg Body, IP52-certified, fanless
Weight
195 g
Price
200 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
78.7 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2023
Nokia G22
T7200, Mali-G57 MP1
195 g64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.52"1600x720
78.5 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2022
Nokia G21
T7200, Mali-G57 MP1
190 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.50"1600x720
79 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2023
Motorola Moto G23
Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2
184.3 g128 GB eMMC Flash6.50"1600x720
76.6 %
v7 (old)
04 / 2023
Xiaomi Redmi 12C
Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2
192 g128 GB eMMC Flash6.71"1650x720

外壳和功能--诺基亚G22的良好维修性?

我们试图打开这个案子的时候留下了痕迹。
我们试图打开这个案子的时候留下了痕迹。

诺基亚手机已经很久没有配备充电器了,充电器的销售收入被捐赠给了环境保护。在诺基亚的网上商店购买可以植树,而且设备被提供较长的保修期,或以订购的方式出售,以便你可以尽可能长时间地使用它们。

现在,制造商在可持续发展方面迈出了下一步:诺基亚G22的背面完全由可回收的塑料制成,并且与iFixit合作销售维修套件,允许更换有缺陷的部件,如屏幕或电池。

幸运的是,更换部件的成本并不高:50欧元一个新显示屏,25欧元一个新电池。诺基亚向我们提供了iFixit的工具集,我们立即尝试打开诺基亚G22。要做到这一点,你必须撬开SIM卡槽的侧边框,这很成功,但即使用软塑料镐也会在外壳上留下痕迹。拆开外壳也很费劲。诺基亚必须在这里做得更多,以减少未来自我维修的障碍。

外壳本身主要由塑料制成,看起来很坚固,手感也不错。前面的压力确实会传到屏幕上,但总的来说,外壳几乎不能被扭曲,只有轻微的凹陷。蓝色和深灰色在欧洲销售,国际上还有一个棕色的版本。

乍一看,诺基亚的G22并没有特别好的装备,对于一款价格为200欧元的手机来说,它有64GB的大容量存储,但内存类型是快速的UFS 2.2闪存。microSD读卡器占据了一个SIM卡槽,事实证明,结合我们的参考卡Angelbird V60,它的速度与同类智能手机相似。

诺基亚G22
诺基亚G22
诺基亚G22
诺基亚G22

尺寸比较

168.8 mm 76.4 mm 8.8 mm 192 g165 mm 76.2 mm 8.5 mm 195 g164.6 mm 75.9 mm 8.5 mm 190 g162.7 mm 74.7 mm 8.2 mm 184.3 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Average of class Smartphone
  (7.7 - 77, n=78, last 2 years)
29.2 MB/s +49%
Motorola Moto G23
  (Angelbird V60)
21.9 MB/s +12%
Nokia G21
  (Angelbird V60)
20.6 MB/s +5%
Nokia G22
  (Angelbird V60)
19.6 MB/s
Xiaomi Redmi 12C
  (Angelbird V60)
18.9 MB/s -4%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Nokia G22 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø37.6 (30.1-45.4)
Nokia G21 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø30.5 (12.9-38.6)
Motorola Moto G23 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø38.6 (28.1-50.2)
Xiaomi Redmi 12C Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø36.5 (23-48)
Nokia G22 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø73.1 (39-81.8)
Nokia G21 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø75.5 (39.6-81.6)
Motorola Moto G23 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø73.1 (32.5-76.9)
Xiaomi Redmi 12C Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø70.3 (36.9-77.5)

通信、软件和操作 - 迅捷的触摸屏

作为一款WiFi-5智能手机,诺基亚的G22在WLAN速度方面与竞争对手不相上下。除了在达到全速之前有一定的启动时间外,传输速度也相当稳定。

不幸的是,诺基亚的G22只是一款4G手机,但在这个价格范围内是可以接受的。为了进一步出国旅行,你应该仔细检查智能手机是否支持必要的频率,以便能够在本地访问移动互联网。

诺基亚安装了相当纯粹的Android 12,并承诺每月进行安全更新,但在测试时,补丁是从2023年3月开始的,我们也看到,该制造商的其他设备往往每月有2-3次更新。该设备应该在上市后3年内进行更新,Android 13和14应该可以用于该手机。不幸的是,一些带有广告的第三方应用程序被预装,但它们可以很容易地被删除。

触摸屏对我们的输入反应迅速,由于90赫兹的帧率,滚动相当流畅。用于解锁设备的指纹传感器位于右侧的待机按钮上。对于右撇子来说,它比左撇子更容易触及。

它能非常可靠地识别存储的指纹,但要等一会儿才能真正解锁手机。也可以使用人脸识别,即使在较弱的光线下,屏幕的亮度通常也足以识别。然而,由于是纯粹的软件解决方案,这种方法在防止操纵方面并不十分安全。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Motorola Moto G23
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
370 (339min - 379max) MBit/s +2%
Xiaomi Redmi 12C
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
367 (345min - 385max) MBit/s +1%
Nokia G22
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
362 (319min - 378max) MBit/s
Nokia G21
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
339 (328min - 362max) MBit/s -6%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Motorola Moto G23
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
346 (322min - 350max) MBit/s +10%
Nokia G22
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
315 (226min - 328max) MBit/s
Nokia G21
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
299 (224min - 315max) MBit/s -5%
Xiaomi Redmi 12C
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
280 (174min - 304max) MBit/s -11%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360Tooltip
Nokia G22; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø315 (226-328)
Nokia G22; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø362 (319-378)

照相机 - 诺基亚G22,5000万像素

来自前置摄像头的照片
来自前置摄像头的照片

诺基亚的G22背面有一个5000万像素的摄像头,另外还有一个分辨率很低的微距摄像头和一个不能拍照的虚化效果镜头的支持。主摄像头在白天拍摄的照片还不错,但在清晰度和细节方面无法与高端手机竞争。

在非常低的光线和高对比度下,合格的照片是成功的,但在非常明亮和非常黑暗的地区,它们不再显示任何画质。在1勒克斯照度下拍摄的照片只显示了测试图中非常明亮的区域。在演播室灯光下,这款手机能够管理一个体面的,尽管有些冲淡的图像质量。

视频可以以1080p和30帧的速度录制。自动对焦在这里有点慢,但曝光补偿工作迅速而可靠。总的来说,电影记录看起来是可用的,但不能满足更高要求。

前置摄像头的分辨率为800万像素。自拍第一眼看上去很不错,但不应该放大太多,否则,你会注意到强烈的颗粒感和黑暗区域的细节不足。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraLowLight
orginal image
click to load images
ColorChecker
17.7 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
22.8 ∆E
22.7 ∆E
19.4 ∆E
13 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
20.3 ∆E
14 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
13 ∆E
12 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
20.3 ∆E
18.1 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
17.2 ∆E
22.8 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
17.3 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Nokia G22: 15.1 ∆E min: 4.43 - max: 22.83 ∆E
ColorChecker
28.2 ∆E
50.1 ∆E
38.6 ∆E
35 ∆E
43.7 ∆E
59.9 ∆E
50.9 ∆E
34.3 ∆E
36.3 ∆E
27 ∆E
60.7 ∆E
61.2 ∆E
29.9 ∆E
46.8 ∆E
33.6 ∆E
71.4 ∆E
40.5 ∆E
41 ∆E
82.7 ∆E
68.8 ∆E
50.5 ∆E
35.9 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Nokia G22: 44.3 ∆E min: 12.89 - max: 82.75 ∆E

显示屏 - 诺基亚G22的明亮IPS屏幕

子像素结构
子像素结构

诺基亚G22的6.52英寸显示屏的分辨率为1600 x 720像素,因此与同类产品相当。然而,它的亮度显然高于该价格范围内的通常比率。我们测量了641cd/m²,所以这款手机在明亮的日子里也可以在户外使用。

明亮的屏幕和可接受的黑值也导致了良好的对比度,这导致了屏幕上更强的色彩表现。只是在明亮的红色中,颜色的准确性稍差,在明亮的灰色中也有明显的偏蓝。

我们没有注意到任何PWM,但由于响应时间较慢,该显示器很难适合要求较高的游戏者。

612
cd/m²
605
cd/m²
618
cd/m²
650
cd/m²
674
cd/m²
650
cd/m²
662
cd/m²
656
cd/m²
642
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 674 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 641 cd/m² Minimum: 5.6 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 674 cd/m²
Contrast: 1567:1 (Black: 0.43 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.45 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 5.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
94.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.072
Nokia G22
IPS, 1600x720, 6.5"
Nokia G21
IPS, 1600x720, 6.5"
Motorola Moto G23
IPS, 1600x720, 6.5"
Xiaomi Redmi 12C
IPS, 1650x720, 6.7"
Response Times
-15%
17%
22%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
60.2 ?(33, 27.2)
64 ?(31, 33)
-6%
46 ?(28, 18)
24%
49.5 ?(29.5, 20)
18%
Response Time Black / White *
27.7 ?(17.9, 9.8)
34 ?(17, 17)
-23%
25 ?(14, 11)
10%
20.9 ?(11.2, 9.7)
25%
PWM Frequency
Screen
-24%
-13%
-9%
Brightness middle
674
492
-27%
522
-23%
417
-38%
Brightness
641
484
-24%
502
-22%
397
-38%
Brightness Distribution
90
86
-4%
91
1%
85
-6%
Black Level *
0.43
0.46
-7%
0.47
-9%
0.35
19%
Contrast
1567
1070
-32%
1111
-29%
1191
-24%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.45
6.02
-35%
4.63
-4%
3.81
14%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
7.41
9.13
-23%
8.59
-16%
7.2
3%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
5.1
7.1
-39%
5.2
-2%
5.2
-2%
Gamma
2.072 106%
2.345 94%
2.296 96%
2.531 87%
CCT
7799 83%
8918 73%
7832 83%
7842 83%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-20% / -22%
2% / -7%
7% / -3%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
27.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17.9 ms rise
↘ 9.8 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
60.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 33 ms rise
↘ 27.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 96 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8738 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

CalMAN灰度
CalMAN灰度
CalMAN颜色精度
CalMAN颜色精度
卡尔曼色彩空间sRGB
卡尔曼色彩空间sRGB
CalMAN饱和度
CalMAN饱和度

性能、排放和电池寿命 - 较早的SoC,具有良好的功率

使用 宇宙飞船T606诺基亚使用与前代产品相同的SoC 诺基亚G21.它在性能上仍能跟上其他设备的步伐,能够实现合理的流畅操作,对大多数日常应用来说是足够的。就面向未来而言,诺基亚应该为其下一款中档手机选择更先进的SoC。

我们喜欢快速的UFS 2.2存储,它大大缩短了复制和加载时间,使诺基亚G22在其价格范围内具有明显优势。

长时间加载后,44.7℃的最高温度在室温条件下是明显的,但不是关键。长时间和高负荷后约3%的性能损失在日常使用中几乎不明显。

下部边缘的扬声器听起来还不错,音乐不会过度膨胀,也不会显得高音太重。在嘈杂的环境中,你可以将音量提高到100%以上,但声音会变得非常单薄。耳机或扬声器可以通过3.5毫米接口连接,或通过蓝牙无线连接。在蓝牙编解码方面,诺基亚的G22标配aptX、aptX HD、SBC、AAC和LDAC。不过,更多现代的变体还没有出现。

5050毫安时的电池与前代产品的尺寸完全相同,但诺基亚G22在我们的Wi-Fi测试中持续的时间少了几分钟。然而,17:32小时是一个很好的结果,这款手机甚至可以在不充电的情况下度过两个工作日。这款智能手机可以用最大的20瓦特充电,然后最多需要2小时,直到电池指示灯再次显示100%。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=174, last 2 years)
1007 Points +225%
Motorola Moto G23
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
354 Points +14%
Nokia G21
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
312 Points +1%
Nokia G22
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
310 Points
Average Unisoc T7200
  (273 - 313, n=19)
306 Points -1%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 8816, n=174, last 2 years)
3359 Points +155%
Motorola Moto G23
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
1363 Points +3%
Nokia G22
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
1318 Points
Average Unisoc T7200
  (708 - 1324, n=19)
1206 Points -8%
Nokia G21
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
1185 Points -10%
Geekbench 6.0
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (188 - 2008, n=41, last 2 years)
1257 Points +240%
Xiaomi Redmi 12C
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
423 Points +14%
Nokia G22
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
370 Points
Average Unisoc T7200
  ()
370 Points 0%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 5702, n=41, last 2 years)
3366 Points +147%
Nokia G22
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
1364 Points
Average Unisoc T7200
  ()
1364 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi 12C
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1315 Points -4%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 24088, n=191, last 2 years)
12972 Points +95%
Xiaomi Redmi 12C
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
8450 Points +27%
Motorola Moto G23
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
8215 Points +24%
Nokia G21
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
7805 Points +18%
Average Unisoc T7200
  (6637 - 8303, n=19)
7338 Points +11%
Nokia G22
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
6637 Points
3DMark
Wild Life Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (408 - 13896, n=111, last 2 years)
2840 Points +596%
Motorola Moto G23
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
748 Points +83%
Xiaomi Redmi 12C
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
733 Points +80%
Average Unisoc T7200
  (394 - 432, n=18)
416 Points +2%
Nokia G22
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
408 Points
Nokia G21
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
397 Points -3%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (413 - 20321, n=181, last 2 years)
7533 Points +1724%
Motorola Moto G23
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
749 Points +81%
Xiaomi Redmi 12C
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
735 Points +78%
Nokia G22
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
413 Points
Average Unisoc T7200
  (392 - 424, n=18)
413 Points 0%
Nokia G21
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
393 Points -5%
Wild Life Extreme
Average of class Smartphone
  (114 - 7094, n=188, last 2 years)
2075 Points +1720%
Motorola Moto G23
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
189 Points +66%
Xiaomi Redmi 12C
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
188 Points +65%
Nokia G22
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
114 Points
Nokia G21
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
111 Points -3%
Average Unisoc T7200
  (85 - 118, n=18)
107.3 Points -6%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Average of class Smartphone
  (112 - 7212, n=186, last 2 years)
2068 Points +1746%
Motorola Moto G23
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
188 Points +68%
Xiaomi Redmi 12C
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
186 Points +66%
Nokia G22
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
112 Points
Nokia G21
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
110 Points -2%
Average Unisoc T7200
  (99 - 121, n=15)
107.7 Points -4%
GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.6 - 247, n=202, last 2 years)
50.5 fps +405%
Xiaomi Redmi 12C
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
17 fps +70%
Motorola Moto G23
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
11 fps +10%
Nokia G22
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
10 fps
Nokia G21
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
9.5 fps -5%
Average Unisoc T7200
  (5.1 - 11, n=18)
8.83 fps -12%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.3 - 261, n=202, last 2 years)
80.3 fps +1360%
Xiaomi Redmi 12C
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
9.5 fps +73%
Motorola Moto G23
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
8.8 fps +60%
Nokia G22
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
5.5 fps
Average Unisoc T7200
  (1.9 - 5.5, n=18)
5.22 fps -5%
Nokia G21
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
5.2 fps -5%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 119, n=202, last 2 years)
37.6 fps +488%
Xiaomi Redmi 12C
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
9.3 fps +45%
Motorola Moto G23
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
7.5 fps +17%
Nokia G22
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
6.4 fps
Nokia G21
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
6 fps -6%
Average Unisoc T7200
  (0.85 - 7.3, n=18)
5.34 fps -17%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 104, n=202, last 2 years)
32.3 fps +1515%
Xiaomi Redmi 12C
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
3.5 fps +75%
Motorola Moto G23
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
3.3 fps +65%
Nokia G21
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
2 fps 0%
Nokia G22
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
2 fps
Average Unisoc T7200
  (0.85 - 2.1, n=18)
1.925 fps -4%
3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.38 - 46, n=202, last 2 years)
15.1 fps +1676%
Xiaomi Redmi 12C
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1.5 fps +76%
Motorola Moto G23
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
1.5 fps +76%
Average Unisoc T7200
  (0.8 - 6.6, n=14)
1.253 fps +47%
Nokia G22
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
0.85 fps
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years)
37278 Points +243%
Motorola Moto G23
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
13252 Points +22%
Xiaomi Redmi 12C
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
11406 Points +5%
Average Unisoc T7200
  (2228 - 13455, n=14)
11332 Points +4%
Nokia G22
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
10858 Points
Nokia G22Nokia G21Motorola Moto G23Xiaomi Redmi 12CAverage 64 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-58%
-42%
-37%
5%
148%
Sequential Read 256KB
881
257.6
-71%
282.4
-68%
290.6
-67%
770 ?(485 - 979, n=18)
-13%
Sequential Write 256KB
367
180.6
-51%
244.6
-33%
225.1
-39%
Random Read 4KB
131
74
-44%
100.2
-24%
112.9
-14%
156.6 ?(88.5 - 220, n=18)
20%
Random Write 4KB
172
60.2
-65%
100.5
-42%
123.7
-28%

温度

Max. Load
 42.1 °C37.4 °C34.5 °C 
 42.4 °C36.9 °C35.4 °C 
 41.5 °C36.7 °C35.2 °C 
Maximum: 42.4 °C
Average: 38 °C
34.1 °C38.9 °C42.7 °C
33.7 °C38.8 °C44.5 °C
35.3 °C39.3 °C44.7 °C
Maximum: 44.7 °C
Average: 39.1 °C
Power Supply (max.)  40.5 °C | Room Temperature 20.5 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.4 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.7 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.3 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.


3DMark - Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Redmi 12C
98.8 (4.4min - 4.46max) % +2%
Motorola Moto G23
98.8 (4.47min - 4.53max) % +2%
Nokia G22
96.8 (2.44min - 2.52max) %

Legend

 
Nokia G22 Unisoc T7200, ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
 
Nokia G21 Unisoc T7200, ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Motorola Moto G23 Mediatek Helio G85, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 128 GB eMMC Flash
 
Xiaomi Redmi 12C Mediatek Helio G85, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 128 GB eMMC Flash

演讲者

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.6382531.541.23126.331.94036.433.1503836.1633125.78018.720.310019.518.412519.221.316017.330.220012.23625011.843.331511.149.840011.65750010.762.66309.264.780013.565100011.967.6125012.171.3160010.172.820009.872.3250010.668315010.970.5400011.867.5500012.569.8630013.362.9800014.1661000014.968.41250015.659.61600016.340.1SPL24.481.1N0.548median 12.1median 64.7Delta2.111.439.443.33737.132.932.532.130.835.736.427.430.921.5202322.624.122.719.524.513.533.313.642.312.649.11255.211.460.211.96411.869.913.27015.869.31171.711.366.91263.412.96514.861.117.264.515.763.515.968.216.573.416.867.217.753.626.579.70.844.8median 13.6median 63.52.711.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseNokia G22Xiaomi Redmi 12C
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Nokia G22 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Redmi 12C audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命

Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
Motorola Moto G23
5000 mAh
1152 min +10%
Nokia G21
5050 mAh
1087 min +3%
Nokia G22
5050 mAh
1052 min
Average of class Smartphone
  (476 - 3244, n=204, last 2 years)
985 min -6%
Xiaomi Redmi 12C
5000 mAh
933 min -11%
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
17h 32min

Pros

+ 部分回收材料
+ 良好的运行时间
+ 可用的扬声器
+ 屏幕明亮
+ 快速内存
+ 3年保修
+ 可以自我修复...

Cons

- ......打开箱子很费劲
- 每月更新的承诺尚未兑现
- 负载下明显发热

评语 - 不错,但还不完美

审查中:诺基亚G22。测试设备由诺基亚德国提供。
审查中:诺基亚G22。测试设备由诺基亚德国提供。

诺基亚一直在思考如何使其产品更具可持续性,这一点值得称赞。特别是相对便宜的智能手机在这里需要创造性。

诺基亚的G22无疑是朝这个方向迈出的另一步,尽管它可能不会完全消除没有经验的用户对打开设备的恐惧。修理仍然有点太复杂,而且会太容易损坏手机。

令人遗憾的是,在安全更新方面的承诺并没有完全兑现。老式的SoC仍能很好地跟上,加上快速的内存,确保了系统基本流畅。屏幕也提供了大量的亮度和良好的对比度。

体面的电池运行时间、可用的扬声器和稳定的Wi-Fi速度也是这款可持续智能手机的加分项。

诺基亚的G22是一款坚实的中档手机,具有快速的内存,在可持续发展方面付出了很多努力。然而,它仍然需要一些微调,然后才能真正轻松地修复一部廉价手机。

前代产品 诺基亚G21现在以低价出售(例如155欧元,在amazon.de),也提供良好的运行时间,但也有一个不太明亮的显示屏。这款手机 摩托罗拉Moto G23带来了大量的内存,一个额外的广角摄像头,以及许多蓝牙编解码器。

价格和可用性

在美国,如果你喜欢流星灰的诺基亚G22,你可以在亚马逊以大约300美元的价格买到它。

Nokia G22 - 05/02/2023 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
84%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
92%
Connectivity
47 / 70 → 67%
Weight
88%
Battery
92%
Display
85%
Games Performance
12 / 64 → 19%
Application Performance
68 / 86 → 79%
Temperature
88%
Noise
100%
Audio
70 / 90 → 78%
Camera
58%
Average
73%
79%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 诺基亚G22智能手机评测--中档手机可自行维修
Florian Schmitt, 2023-05- 3 (Update: 2023-05- 3)