Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Magyar摩托罗拉Moto G23智能手机评测--为中端产品提供充足的内存
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 79 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2023 | Motorola Moto G23 Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2 | 184.3 g | 128 GB eMMC Flash | 6.50" | 1600x720 | |
| 75.1 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2022 | Motorola Moto G22 Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320 | 185 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.50" | 1600x720 | |
| 79.1 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2023 | Motorola Moto G53 SD 480+, Adreno 619 | 183 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.50" | 1600x720 | |
| 78.9 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2022 | Xiaomi Poco M5 Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2 | 201 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.58" | 2408x1080 | |
| 77.9 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2022 | Samsung Galaxy A13 5G Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2 | 195 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.50" | 1600x720 |
外壳和功能 - 亚光塑料
摩托罗拉Moto G23的制造商价格为230欧元，并不完全便宜，但它也配备了8GB内存和128GB大容量存储的茂密存储配置。几乎没有任何同类手机能跟上。
这款Moto手机有深灰色、白色或蓝色可供选择，机身似乎很稳定：在背面的压力达不到显示屏，但直接按在屏幕上时就能达到。手机几乎不能被扭曲。Moto G23具有良好的制造质量，材料的过渡并不明显。背面是哑光的，但不能很好地抵御指纹。相机模块突出于外壳。这款Moto手机只有184克，就其价格范围而言是比较轻的，手感也不错。
NFC是Moto G23的部分设备，因此你也可以使用移动支付服务。还有一个microSD读卡器，与两个SIM卡插槽分开。该读卡器与我们参考的microSD Angelbird V60相当，但它不能提供出色的读写速率。
| SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (7.7 - 77, n=78, last 2 years) | |
| Motorola Moto G53 (Angelbird V60) | |
| Xiaomi Poco M5 (Angelbird V60) | |
| Motorola Moto G22 (Angelbird V60) | |
| Motorola Moto G23 (Angelbird V60) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A13 5G (Angelbird V60) | |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
通信、软件和操作 - 更新情况不明确
这款手机支持WiFi 5，在我们使用参考路由器华硕ROG Rapture AXE11000的测试中可以提供稳定的传输速率。这些传输率在320至380MBit/s之间，因此处于配备WiFi 5的手机的典型水平。在我们的样本测试中，WLAN网络的信号强度也很好。
Moto G23是一款4G智能手机，为欧洲市场提供了足够的频率，也为国外旅行提供了足够的频率。然而，它不是一款世界手机，所以在进一步旅行之前，你应该检查智能手机是否可以在当地网络上使用。在测试过程中，4G信号明显比我们样品中的高端手机要弱。同时，在测试中没有出现完全断线的情况。
Android 13被用作操作系统，和摩托罗拉的惯例一样，预装了相当多的应用程序，没有第三方程序。安全补丁是从2023年1月开始的，因此在测试时有点老。有Widevine认证，所以你可以享受高清的流媒体内容。
90赫兹的屏幕可以流畅而准确地使用，你也可以在浏览器中快速滚动页面。非常复杂的应用程序和多任务处理会不时地造成卡顿。指纹传感器隐藏在外壳右侧的待机按钮中。它几乎毫无延迟地解锁智能手机，并且通常提供可靠的识别率。
智能手机也可以通过面部生物识别解锁。在黑暗中通过屏幕的光线识别效果很好，但由于它是基于软件的，所以不那么安全。
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| Motorola Moto G22 | |
| Xiaomi Poco M5 | |
| Motorola Moto G23 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A13 5G | |
| Motorola Moto G53 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Xiaomi Poco M5 | |
| Motorola Moto G23 | |
| Motorola Moto G53 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A13 5G | |
| Motorola Moto G22 | |
照相机 - 许多镜头
很棒的是，Moto G23的背面有一个真正的三摄像头：来自三星的5000万像素的主摄像头，一个超广角镜头，以及一个微距摄像头。然而，没有混合变焦，所以你只能在镜头之间手动切换。
让我们先来看看主摄像头的图像质量：乍一看，日光下的快照看起来相当体面，但仔细一看就会发现清晰度相对较低，细节损失很大。然而，我们喜欢相机在良好照明条件下的动态效果。在低光照和高对比度的情况下，清晰度也明显下降，在黑暗区域几乎没有任何增亮。
广角摄像头的分辨率为500万像素，拍摄的快照相当漂亮。然而，你不应该寻找细节，因为它们只是非常粗略的表现。微距相机的分辨率更低，只有200万像素。它可以用来拍摄非常近的细节，效果也相当不错。然而，光线必须非常好，而且照片不应该被放大太多。
前面有一个自拍相机；它的分辨率为1600万像素。拍出的照片也可以使用更多的亮度，但细节是相当不错的。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain cameraLow LightWide-angle
显示 - 摩托罗拉没有PWM
Moto G23采用IPS显示屏，分辨率为1600 x 720像素。该面板还可以显示每秒90帧，这使得游戏或视频中的滚动和画面都很流畅。
该显示器没有PWM，所以即使是敏感的用户也不应该有任何闪烁的问题。屏幕的平均亮度超过500cd/m²，令人信服，因此你也可以在更明亮的日子里把Moto G23带到户外。
然而，黑值略高，导致对比度平平。在显示屏上可以看到明显的偏蓝现象，尤其是蓝色调，而且非常明亮的灰度显示方式也不平衡。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 522 cd/m²
Contrast: 1111:1 (Black: 0.47 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.63 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 5.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
93.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.296
| Motorola Moto G23 IPS, 1600x720, 6.5" | Motorola Moto G22 IPS LCD, 1600x720, 6.5" | Motorola Moto G53 IPS, 1600x720, 6.5" | Xiaomi Poco M5 IPS, 2408x1080, 6.6" | Samsung Galaxy A13 5G PLS, 1600x720, 6.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response Times | -18% | -14% | 24% | -3% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 46 ? | 46 ? -0% | 56 ? -22% | 33 ? 28% | 41 ? 11% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 25 ? | 34 ? -36% | 26.6 ? -6% | 20 ? 20% | 29 ? -16% |
| PWM Frequency | |||||
| Screen | -11% | 23% | 32% | 1% | |
| Brightness middle | 522 | 451 -14% | 587 12% | 400 -23% | 471 -10% |
| Brightness | 502 | 431 -14% | 559 11% | 396 -21% | 437 -13% |
| Brightness Distribution | 91 | 90 -1% | 91 0% | 96 5% | 86 -5% |
| Black Level * | 0.47 | 0.5 -6% | 0.4 15% | 0.27 43% | 0.31 34% |
| Contrast | 1111 | 902 -19% | 1468 32% | 1481 33% | 1519 37% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.63 | 5.82 -26% | 2.6 44% | 1.26 73% | 5.43 -17% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.59 | 9.3 -8% | 5.62 35% | 2.45 71% | 10.55 -23% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.2 | 5 4% | 3.3 37% | 1.5 71% | 5.1 2% |
| Gamma | 2.296 96% | 2.776 79% | 2.463 89% | 2.298 96% | 2.12 104% |
| CCT | 7832 83% | 7683 85% | 6288 103% | 6658 98% | 7465 87% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -15% /
-12% | 5% /
16% | 28% /
30% | -1% /
0% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 25 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 11 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 55 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 28 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 18 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 77 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能、排放和电池寿命 - 耐力跑者
淘宝网 联发科Helio G85SOC被用于许多低成本的智能手机和平板电脑，包括摩托罗拉Moto G23。它足以满足流畅的日常操作，尽管相比之下，诸如 小米Poco M5或 三星Galaxy A13 5G在这个价格范围内提供更多的性能。这在启动更复杂的应用程序或多任务时变得很明显。
在存储方面，摩托罗拉依靠缓慢的eMMC闪存，而小米，例如，已经依靠UFS 2.2在 Poco M5.这只会导致我们的测试设备的读写速度相对较慢。
在我们的测试中，我们不能确定在长时间的负载下有过高的发热或性能的节流。
Moto G23在底部边缘有一个专门的扬声器，并使用听筒来支持，所以立体声是可能的。声音系统可以提供更多的动力，但即使在最大音量下也不会过度，听起来有点高音，但不会令人不快。通过外部音频设备，声音会变得更好：3.5毫米插孔或蓝牙可用于连接它们。蓝牙的编解码器种类相当丰富，有SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD、LDAC、LHDC和LHDC-V，所以许多设备都能兼容。
摩托罗拉从5000毫安时的电池中获得了非常好的运行时间：我们在WLAN测试中测得超过19个小时，这比所有的对比设备都能带来更多。因此，那些在廉价智能手机中寻找真正的长跑运动员的人，会在Moto G23上得到他们的金钱回报。这款手机的充电功率为30瓦，对于这个价格范围来说是很不错的。盒子里有一个合适的充电器。
| GFXBench | |
| on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 123, n=201, last 2 years) | |
| Motorola Moto G53 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A13 5G | |
| Xiaomi Poco M5 | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G85 (7.5 - 22, n=15) | |
| Motorola Moto G23 | |
| Motorola Moto G22 | |
| 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 261, n=201, last 2 years) | |
| Motorola Moto G53 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A13 5G | |
| Xiaomi Poco M5 | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G85 (8 - 9.7, n=15) | |
| Motorola Moto G23 | |
| Motorola Moto G22 | |
| on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
| Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 119, n=201, last 2 years) | |
| Motorola Moto G53 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A13 5G | |
| Xiaomi Poco M5 | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G85 (5 - 13, n=15) | |
| Motorola Moto G23 | |
| Motorola Moto G22 | |
| 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
| Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 104, n=201, last 2 years) | |
| Motorola Moto G53 | |
| Xiaomi Poco M5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A13 5G | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G85 (3.1 - 3.5, n=15) | |
| Motorola Moto G23 | |
| Motorola Moto G22 | |
| Motorola Moto G23 | Motorola Moto G22 | Motorola Moto G53 | Xiaomi Poco M5 | Samsung Galaxy A13 5G | Average 128 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -56% | 43% | 202% | -12% | -21% | 354% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 282.4 | 215.45 -24% | 474.6 68% | 976.4 246% | 289.7 3% | 283 ? 0% | 1839 ? 551% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 244.6 | 112.78 -54% | 243.87 0% | 870.7 256% | 176.7 -28% | 194.6 ? -20% | 1425 ? 483% |
| Random Read 4KB | 100.2 | 39.32 -61% | 166.24 66% | 247.6 147% | 86.2 -14% | 82.7 ? -17% | 277 ? 176% |
| Random Write 4KB | 100.5 | 16.34 -84% | 139.83 39% | 257.8 157% | 90.9 -10% | 55.1 ? -45% | 309 ? 207% |
温度
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.7 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.3 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.9 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
| 3DMark - Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Samsung Galaxy A13 5G | |
| Motorola Moto G23 | |
| Xiaomi Poco M5 | |
| Motorola Moto G53 | |
演讲者
Motorola Moto G23 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 61% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 35% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 55% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电池寿命
| Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing | |
| Motorola Moto G23 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A13 5G | |
| Motorola Moto G22 | |
| Motorola Moto G53 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (476 - 3244, n=202, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Poco M5 | |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 希望得到回报的好设备
除了电池运行时间长之外，摩托罗拉的Moto G23还提供了一个明亮的屏幕和一个在其价格范围内相当灵活的相机系统。这里应该特别提到广角摄像头。
虽然它自信地定价为230欧元，但它也提供了大量的内存和存储空间。在WLAN和LTE方面，这款手机提供了良好的接收和坚实的传输速率。扬声器的声音很扎实，智能手机不怎么发热，而且由于Widevine L1，你还可以观看高清内容。
更便宜的手机也有90赫兹的屏幕，而Moto G23在某些方面的性能落后于同类设备。
摩托罗拉的Moto G23是一款不错的4G智能手机，内存很大。目前它的价格相对较高，尤其是它在性能方面也比较落后。
尽管如此，这款手机总体表现良好，并为其价格提供了足够的功能。如果你想要最新的手机标准，你会很高兴使用 三星Galaxy A13 5G.这款 小米Poco M5提供了更多的性能，并配备了更高的屏幕分辨率。
价格和可用性
摩托罗拉Moto G23可直接从制造商处购买，价格略低于230欧元。
该智能手机也可以在amazon.de上以这个价格出售。.
Motorola Moto G23
- 03/29/2023 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Price comparison
