Notebookcheck Logo

诺基亚G60评测--含有回收成分的中档手机

比它的大哥更有力量。

诺基亚G60的外壳是由60%的可回收塑料制成的,而且这款手机还应该提供更长时间的更新以延长其使用寿命。因此,这款中档手机以可持续发展的形象出现,但它在日常使用中也能令人信服吗?
Android ARM Smartphone
诺基亚G60
Nokia G60 (G Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 8 x 1.7 - 2.2 GHz, Kryo 660 Gold (2x Cortex-A78) / Silver (6x Cortex-A55)
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 619
Memory
4 GB 
Display
6.58 inch 20:9, 2408 x 1080 pixel 401 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS, glossy: yes, 120 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 128 GB 
, 112 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5mm, Card Reader: microSD (shared, up to 1TB), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.1, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B3/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B20/​B28/​B38/​B39/​B40/​B41), 5G (n1/​n3/​n5/​n7/​n8/​n28/​n38/​n40/​n41/​n77/​n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.6 x 166 x 75.9
Battery
4500 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 20 Watt charging
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix f/​1.8, phase comparison-AF, LED-flash, Videos @1080p/​30fps (Camera 1); 5.0MP, f/​2.2, wide angle lens (Camera 2); 2.0MP, f/​2.4, depth of field (Camera 3)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/2.0, 1/4.0", 1.12µm, Videos @1080p/​30fps
Additional features
Speakers: mono speaker, USB cable, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, FM radio, IP52-certified, SAR: 1.100W/​kg (head), 1.270W/​kg (body) , fanless
Weight
190 g
Price
349 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
79.2 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2022
Nokia G60
SD 695 5G, Adreno 619
190 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.58"2408x1080
78.5 %
v7 (old)
11 / 2021
Nokia G50
SD 480, Adreno 619
220 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.82"1560x720
81.7 %
v7 (old)
07 / 2022
Motorola Moto G82 5G
SD 695 5G, Adreno 619
173 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.60"2400x1080
80.8 %
v7 (old)
08 / 2022
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
SD 695 5G, Adreno 619
195 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.59"2412x1080

案例和设备 - 也可通过订阅提供

一款350欧元的手机真的可以持续制造吗?这就是诺基亚G60在测试时的价格,例如在amazon.de.考虑到价格从580欧元起的 公平电话4模块化结构和负责任的原材料来源,这似乎值得怀疑。不过,诺基亚已经试图在中档手机上迈出第一步,并在外壳上使用60%的可回收塑料。

也可以通过《诺基亚循环》订阅来租用该设备。在那里,你每月支付15欧元,如果手机不能再使用,你可以得到一个替换设备。3个月后,你可以在任何时候临时通知取消。用过的设备被送回诺基亚,在那里它们被翻新转售、回收、重新用于生产或在零件店维修,或捐赠给慈善机构。这也是为了提高可持续性。

回收的内容也导致了机箱背面的独特外观,它提供了黑色或浅灰色,含有塑料颗粒,在光线下闪闪发光。哑光塑料边框干净利落地与背面融为一体,屏幕也很合身,导致缝隙很窄,几乎看不出过渡。诺基亚G60很好地应对了表壳上的压力。只有在扭动时,屏幕的液晶才会出现明显的斑点,但它们又立即消失。机箱的防水和防尘性能符合IP52标准。

机上有128GB的大容量存储。在欧洲,目前只提供4GB工作内存的型号,这在这个价格范围内并不是真正最新的。在国际上,也有一个6GB工作内存的变体。

不幸的是,插入microSD来扩展内存会阻塞两个SIM卡插槽中的一个。通过我们的参考microSD卡Angelbird V60,我们得到了一个非常缓慢的读卡器的图片,在CPDT基准中提供波动的结果。

诺基亚G60
诺基亚G60
诺基亚G60
诺基亚G60
诺基亚G60
诺基亚G60
诺基亚G60

尺寸比较

173.8 mm 77.7 mm 8.9 mm 220 g166 mm 75.9 mm 8.6 mm 190 g164.3 mm 75.6 mm 8.5 mm 195 g160.9 mm 74.5 mm 8 mm 173 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Average of class Smartphone
  (7.7 - 77, n=79, last 2 years)
29.4 MB/s +130%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
  (Angelbird V60)
28.9 MB/s +126%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
  (Angelbird V60)
27.5 MB/s +115%
Nokia G50
  (Angelbird V60)
20.7 MB/s +62%
Nokia G60
  (Angelbird V60)
12.79 MB/s

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Nokia G60 Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø40.1 (29.6-51.1)
Nokia G50 Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø34.6 (7.62-42.4)
Motorola Moto G82 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø33.1 (23.8-41.8)
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø36.2 (29.8-46.8)
Nokia G60 Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø76.8 (28.7-84.1)
Nokia G50 Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø76.3 (31.1-83.5)
Motorola Moto G82 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø76.2 (38-84.1)
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø76.1 (42.7-84.9)

通信、软件和操作--使用诺基亚手机的纯Android

诺基亚的G60是一款5G手机,但它没有覆盖4G范围内的许多频率,所以你在国外旅行时可能无法使用这款手机进行移动互联网。

在Wi-Fi方面,诺基亚称该手机为WiFi 6-ready,但在速度方面与其他同价位的Wi-Fi 5手机相比没有优势:在我们用参考路由器华硕ROG Rapture AXE11000进行的测试中,诺基亚的G60显示出350MBit/s左右的稳定传输率。这对应的是等级标准。

诺基亚依靠Android One,即纯Android ,出厂时不安装任何广告应用程序。安全更新应该是3年,操作系统更新也是3年,这使诺基亚在这个价格范围内处于一个良好的位置。此外,从2022年9月开始的安全更新在测试时是相当最新的。

触摸屏对触摸的反应非常可靠,响应速度也非常快,最高可达120Hz。然而,系统会自动决定何时激活120赫兹。根据我们的测试结果,这种情况经常发生。只有当画面在较长时间内没有变化时,才会降到60赫兹。诺基亚的G60没有谷歌助手按钮。

指纹传感器被整合到外壳右侧的待机按钮中。它能可靠地检测到学习过的手指,并在短暂的延迟后解锁设备。通过面部识别解锁也是可能的,但只能通过前置摄像头和软件解决方案,所以它不太安全,必须有足够的光线。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Nokia G50
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
322 (308min - 331max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Nokia G50
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
341 (294min - 350max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Motorola Moto G82 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
364 (349min - 382max) MBit/s +2%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
363 (354min - 376max) MBit/s +2%
Nokia G60
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
357 (321min - 366max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
352 (339min - 360max) MBit/s +7%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
342 (321min - 351max) MBit/s +4%
Nokia G60
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
330 (313min - 338max) MBit/s
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360Tooltip
Nokia G60; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø329 (313-338)
Nokia G60; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø357 (321-366)

摄像机 - 广角摄像机,质量不高

来自前置摄像头的照片
来自前置摄像头的照片

主摄像头的传感器的分辨率为5000万像素,来自Omnivision。照片默认以1250万像素记录,以便使用更大、更敏感的像素。如果需要,可以在特殊模式下启用全分辨率。

照片在户外看起来常常有点阴沉和模糊的细节,但总体上提供了一个体面的各种细节和色彩细微差别。在光线不足的情况下,增亮只以较大颜色区域的斑点表现和相当低的锐度为代价获得成功。在非常黑暗的区域也几乎没有任何绘画。

视频可以以1080p和30帧的速度录制。亮度调节工作良好,但自动对焦非常缓慢。广角镜头也可用于视频,但在录制过程中不能切换相机。

说到广角镜头:500万像素的摄像头可以拍摄出体面的增亮照片,但有些照片看起来很有颗粒感,远处的物体只能显示为像素模糊。你可以把它们作为快照使用,但它们不能满足更高的要求。

前置摄像头在光线良好的情况下可以拍出体面的自拍,但你不应该把它们放大太多,否则颗粒状的颜色区域会非常明显。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraLow LightWide-angle
orginal image
click to load images
ColorChecker
11.7 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
5 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
4 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
8 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Nokia G60: 6.2 ∆E min: 2.28 - max: 14.73 ∆E
ColorChecker
25.2 ∆E
44.9 ∆E
33.2 ∆E
40.6 ∆E
36.6 ∆E
55.1 ∆E
45.8 ∆E
28 ∆E
31.5 ∆E
18.9 ∆E
55 ∆E
57.9 ∆E
23.6 ∆E
43.8 ∆E
28.5 ∆E
60.8 ∆E
32.8 ∆E
44.2 ∆E
55.9 ∆E
57.3 ∆E
44.5 ∆E
33.1 ∆E
23.2 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Nokia G60: 39 ∆E min: 15.54 - max: 60.78 ∆E

显示屏 - 希望能有更多的亮度

子像素结构
子像素结构

不幸的是,诺基亚G60的1080p屏幕并不真正明亮,所以在明亮的日子里,你在户外阅读显示屏会有问题。我们在用分光光度计和CalMAN软件的测试中注意到明显的蓝色偏光。

黑色水平很好,但由于最大亮度低,对比度也很一般,颜色看起来很暗淡。

至少,即使在很低的亮度下,显示器也不会出现PWM闪烁,所以它非常适用于对闪烁敏感的人。

371
cd/m²
402
cd/m²
390
cd/m²
367
cd/m²
417
cd/m²
395
cd/m²
382
cd/m²
399
cd/m²
365
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 417 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 387.6 cd/m² Minimum: 2.8 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 417 cd/m²
Contrast: 1544:1 (Black: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.68 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 5.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.428
Nokia G60
IPS, 2408x1080, 6.6"
Nokia G50
IPS, 1560x720, 6.8"
Motorola Moto G82 5G
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.6"
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
IPS, 2412x1080, 6.6"
Response Times
-54%
53%
32%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
33 ?(16, 17)
52 ?(25, 27)
-58%
13 ?(8, 5)
61%
27 ?(15, 12)
18%
Response Time Black / White *
22 ?(11, 11)
33 ?(17, 16)
-50%
12 ?(6, 6)
45%
12 ?(8, 4)
45%
PWM Frequency
2358 ?(15)
119.4
Screen
17%
33%
1%
Brightness middle
417
568
36%
635
52%
590
41%
Brightness
388
525
35%
640
65%
561
45%
Brightness Distribution
88
85
-3%
96
9%
92
5%
Black Level *
0.27
0.24
11%
0.38
-41%
Contrast
1544
2367
53%
1553
1%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
5.68
5.31
7%
2.96
48%
5.15
9%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
8.62
9.04
-5%
7.63
11%
10.35
-20%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
5.5
5.6
-2%
4.8
13%
7.1
-29%
Gamma
2.428 91%
2.517 87%
2.214 99%
2.143 103%
CCT
7955 82%
7541 86%
6970 93%
8540 76%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-19% / 2%
43% / 38%
17% / 7%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11 ms rise
↘ 11 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
33 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16 ms rise
↘ 17 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 41 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

CalMAN灰度
CalMAN灰度
CalMAN颜色精度
CalMAN颜色精度
卡尔曼色彩空间sRGB
卡尔曼色彩空间sRGB
CalMAN饱和度
CalMAN饱和度

性能、排放和电池寿命--G60的性能率良好

随着 高通骁龙695 5G诺基亚依靠的是在中端市场非常流行的SoC。因此,诺基亚G60为其价格范围提供了合适的性能率,甚至可以超过原本更昂贵的 诺基亚X20它仍然基于稍旧的 骁龙480.在日常使用中,其功率通常足以使系统平稳运行。只有更复杂的应用程序才会导致卡顿。

在较长的负载下,机箱的升温是明显的,即使在室温下也有46.7℃,非常高。诺基亚的G60可能会发热得更厉害,在炎热的环境温度下变得不舒服。然而,正如3DMark压力测试所显示的那样,即使在较长时间的负载后,SoC也不会出现节流现象。

底部边缘的扬声器不能变得那么响亮,在音乐和讲话时听起来相当单薄。通过蓝牙或3.5毫米端口连接的外部设备可以提供更好的声音。通过蓝牙支持现代aptX编解码器,如aptX自适应。

诺基亚G60的包装盒中不包括充电器,但其他制造商的各种充电器在我们的测试中没有问题。这款手机的最大充电功率为20瓦,因此需要大约2个小时,直到4500毫安时的空电池再次充满。

由于电池尺寸较小,G60在运行时间方面也不得不做出让步。14:31小时仍然是一个不错的运行时间,你甚至可以在没有电源插座的情况下适度使用2天。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=176, last 2 years)
1037 Points +55%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
687 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (659 - 697, n=24)
676 Points +1%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
671 Points +1%
Nokia G60
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
667 Points
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
514 Points -23%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 8816, n=176, last 2 years)
3464 Points +83%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1998 Points +6%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1946 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (1663 - 2038, n=24)
1904 Points +1%
Nokia G60
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1889 Points
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1618 Points -14%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 27169, n=197, last 2 years)
13179 Points +70%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (6897 - 11732, n=23)
9629 Points +24%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
9363 Points +21%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
7843 Points +1%
Nokia G60
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
7747 Points
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
7111 Points -8%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Average of class Smartphone
  (286 - 17553, n=70, last 2 years)
3006 Points +2%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2959 Points +1%
Nokia G60
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2933 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (2827 - 2983, n=19)
2930 Points 0%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2917 Points -1%
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2476 Points -16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (240 - 29890, n=70, last 2 years)
3166 Points +12%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2837 Points +1%
Nokia G60
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2816 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (2733 - 2845, n=19)
2813 Points 0%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2809 Points 0%
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2346 Points -17%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3481 Points +1%
Nokia G60
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3431 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (3093 - 3554, n=19)
3407 Points -1%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3370 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (858 - 7180, n=70, last 2 years)
3260 Points -5%
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3071 Points -10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Average of class Smartphone
  (317 - 22303, n=162, last 2 years)
8158 Points +164%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3104 Points 0%
Nokia G60
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3096 Points
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3086 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (2887 - 3107, n=21)
3069 Points -1%
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2587 Points -16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (267 - 40163, n=162, last 2 years)
12271 Points +311%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3001 Points 0%
Nokia G60
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2989 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (2812 - 3008, n=21)
2974 Points -1%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2973 Points -1%
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2471 Points -17%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Average of class Smartphone
  (877 - 10259, n=162, last 2 years)
4723 Points +34%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3561 Points +1%
Nokia G60
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3537 Points
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3529 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (3182 - 3613, n=21)
3465 Points -2%
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3093 Points -13%
Wild Life Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (408 - 13896, n=112, last 2 years)
2823 Points +133%
Nokia G60
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1214 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (1197 - 1292, n=22)
1212 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1209 Points 0%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1206 Points -1%
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
980 Points -19%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (413 - 25785, n=188, last 2 years)
7929 Points +557%
Nokia G60
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1207 Points
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1204 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (1193 - 1227, n=22)
1204 Points 0%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1201 Points 0%
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
976 Points -19%
Wild Life Extreme
Average of class Smartphone
  (114 - 7094, n=195, last 2 years)
2172 Points +505%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
363 Points +1%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
360 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (355 - 364, n=22)
360 Points 0%
Nokia G60
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
359 Points
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
293 Points -18%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Average of class Smartphone
  (112 - 7212, n=193, last 2 years)
2166 Points +512%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
354 Points 0%
Nokia G60
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
354 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (351 - 371, n=22)
354 Points 0%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
351 Points -1%
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
288 Points -19%
GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.6 - 247, n=207, last 2 years)
51.7 fps +187%
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
29 fps +61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (18 - 38, n=23)
19.7 fps +9%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
19 fps +6%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
19 fps +6%
Nokia G60
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
18 fps
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.3 - 321, n=207, last 2 years)
84.6 fps +303%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
22 fps +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (21 - 23, n=23)
21.5 fps +2%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
21 fps 0%
Nokia G60
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
21 fps
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
18 fps -14%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 144, n=207, last 2 years)
38.9 fps +224%
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
18 fps +50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (11 - 24, n=23)
12.4 fps +3%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
12 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
12 fps 0%
Nokia G60
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
12 fps
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 129, n=207, last 2 years)
34 fps +342%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
8.1 fps +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (7.7 - 8.2, n=23)
7.99 fps +4%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
7.8 fps +1%
Nokia G60
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
7.7 fps
Nokia G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
6.5 fps -16%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years)
38550 Points +75%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (17849 - 31647, n=21)
24051 Points +9%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
22285 Points +1%
Nokia G60
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
22014 Points
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
21468 Points -2%
Nokia G60Nokia G50Motorola Moto G82 5GOnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5GAverage 128 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-2%
-8%
-6%
14%
148%
Sequential Read 256KB
521.5
515
-1%
473.4
-9%
509.21
-2%
Sequential Write 256KB
478.6
486.6
2%
445.7
-7%
482.15
1%
Random Read 4KB
187.2
182
-3%
180.8
-3%
179.02
-4%
Random Write 4KB
177
166.5
-6%
155.5
-12%
147.46
-17%

温度

Max. Load
 46.7 °C37.8 °C33.4 °C 
 46.6 °C37.6 °C33 °C 
 44.9 °C36.9 °C33.1 °C 
Maximum: 46.7 °C
Average: 38.9 °C
33.2 °C36.1 °C44.5 °C
33.8 °C39.9 °C45.8 °C
34.4 °C39.3 °C45.9 °C
Maximum: 45.9 °C
Average: 39.2 °C
Power Supply (max.)  40.3 °C | Room Temperature 20.2 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.9 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.7 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.9 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.3 °C / 72 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.


热力图前线
热力图前线
热图 背面
热图 背面
01234567Tooltip
Motorola Moto G82 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø2.16 (2.16-2.18)
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø2.15 (2.14-2.16)
Motorola Moto G82 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.24 (7.23-7.27)
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.21 (7.21-7.23)

演讲者

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.237.12531.6333128.227.44029.631.55034.233.76326.726.58019.419.610020.119.912513.82216013.326.920010.430.425011.237.23159.541.7400949.25009.456.96309.358.880013.160.3100015.171.2125015.572.316009.66920009.367.4250010.166.2315010.664.3400011.468.550001268.9630012.961.6800013.569.81000014.170.11250014.953.91600015.542.8SPL24.479.9N0.543.9median 12median 60.3Delta2.413.543.942.434.535.827.731.428.530.133.233.326.328.623.417.222.519.715.418.814.629.212.338.313.346.611.650.27.555.511.462.315.26414.767.311.870.6127110.3729.36910.86814.762.514.370.214.970.31567.815.467.616.861.516.167.61751.225.980.70.747.4median 14.6median 642.110.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseNokia G60OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Nokia G60 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 72% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 70% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命

Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
5000 mAh
1064 min +22%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
5000 mAh
1022 min +17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (476 - 3244, n=209, last 2 years)
991 min +14%
Nokia G50
5000 mAh
972 min +12%
Nokia G60
4500 mAh
871 min
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
14h 31min

Pros

+ 纯粹Android
+ 良好的性能
+ 更长的更新承诺
+ 快速内存
+ 负载下无节流现象
+ 120-Hz屏幕

Cons

- 在较长的负载期间强烈发热
- 平庸的扬声器
- 黑屏
- 读卡器速度慢

评语--标准而有趣的方面

审查中。诺基亚G60。测试设备由:
审查中。诺基亚G60。测试设备由:
数码港.com

诺基亚的G60是一款相当普通的中档智能手机,它想在几个方面从竞争中脱颖而出:一方面是较长的更新承诺,在这个价格范围内,这其实是不错的。纯粹的Android ,也是令人信服的。

由于采用了可回收成分,这款手机在外壳方面也提供了某种程度上更可持续的方法,但它绝不是公平手机的水平。在这种情况下,循环订阅是一种更可持续地使用诺基亚G60的方式,即以相对便宜的月费租用它,并在使用后归还诺基亚,尽可能长时间地回收手机。

缺点是屏幕有点暗,而且相机照片也相当暗。扬声器也很难让人信服,手机会相当热,而且提供的电池比许多同类设备要小。

诺基亚的G60在可持续发展领域提供了有趣的方法,纯粹的Android ,而且性能良好。然而,购买者必须忍受昏暗的屏幕和较短的电池运行时间。

在中端市场,竞争非常激烈,例如 摩托罗拉Moto G82它甚至有一个OLED屏幕。该 一加北CE 2 Lite另一方面,它的快速充电技术令人信服。

价格和可用性

在测试时,诺基亚G60可从许多零售商处购买。直接从制造商处购买,你可以以349欧元的价格买到它,或者以循环订购的方式。

该设备也可以在amazon.de上以同样的价格购买。而你目前可以在我们的借贷伙伴cyberport.de上节省20欧元。你目前可以节省20欧元。

Nokia G60 - 10/08/2022 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
82%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
93%
Connectivity
48 / 70 → 68%
Weight
89%
Battery
90%
Display
84%
Games Performance
37 / 64 → 58%
Application Performance
68 / 86 → 79%
Temperature
78%
Noise
100%
Audio
52 / 90 → 58%
Camera
56%
Average
72%
79%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 诺基亚G60评测--含有回收成分的中档手机
Florian Schmitt, 2022-10-12 (Update: 2022-10-12)