GPD Win Max 2掌上游戏电脑回顾。英特尔酷睿i7-1260P或AMD Ryzen 7 6800U?
GPD一直以其不断增长的配备有足够快的游戏硬件的掌上电脑阵容而成为头条新闻。仅在去年就推出了三款这样的机型:Win 3、Win Max和Pocket 3,每一款都有自己独特的设计和对移动游戏的扭曲。
2022年,GPD推出了Win Max 2,直接取代第一代2021年的Win Max。这一最新机型是对第一代机型的完全重新设计,具有更多辅助功能和更快的硬件。用户可以选择英特尔第12代 酷睿i7-1260P或AMD Ryzen 7 6800U分别带有集成的Iris Xe或Radeon 680M图形。每个版本预计零售价为1000美元。
Win Max 2在其领域是独一无二的,因为它是唯一配备英特尔Alder Lake-P CPU的10.1英寸笔记本电脑之一,相对于其尺寸类别而言,具有非常高的性能水平。更多信息和规格可以在其官方产品页面。.本评论侧重于该机型的英特尔版本。
更多GPD评论。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
84.5 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2022 | GPD Win Max 2 i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1 kg | 23 mm | 10.10" | 2560x1600 | |
86.3 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2021 | GPD Pocket 3 i7-1195G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 730 g | 20 mm | 8.00" | 1920x1200 | |
79.3 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2021 | GPD Win Max 2021 R7 4800U, Vega 8 | 850 g | 26 mm | 8.00" | 1280x800 | |
v (old) | GPD Win 3 i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 553 g | 27 mm | 5.50" | 1280x720 | ||
85.3 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2021 | Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3 i3-10100Y, UHD Graphics 615 | 783 g | 8.3 mm | 10.50" | 1920x1280 | |
78.1 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2021 | Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 3 11IGL05 Celeron N4020, UHD Graphics 600 | 1.1 kg | 17.5 mm | 11.60" | 1366x768 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
案例 - 熟悉的感觉
GPD在其产品中使用了类似的金属材料,因此它们都有相同的质地、感觉和外观。即便如此,建造质量也比原来的Win Max好,因为底座和盖子都只表现出最小的弯曲,几乎没有吱吱作响。这也是对Win 3的改进,我们发现它的滑动机制有些脆弱。
该系列的新产品是两个可拆卸的操纵杆磁盖。他们的用处主要是在教室或会议期间想掩盖控制器按钮的用户的表面上。
Win Max 2的屏幕尺寸比原来的Win Max大得多,这意味着即使考虑到更窄的显示屏边框,较新的机型也比前者更重更大。尽管如此,它仍然比大多数笔记本电脑要轻,只有1公斤多一点,其便携性不容低估。
连接性 - AMD版本没有Thunderbolt
Win Max 2放弃了原来Win Max上的RJ-45端口,换成了一个额外的USB-A端口和一个全尺寸的SD读卡器。只有英特尔SKU支持Thunderbolt 4。
请注意,HDMI和USB-A端口是上下颠倒的,这可能有点令人讨厌,因为它们在笔记本电脑上几乎总是右倾的。
SD卡读卡器 - 有两种选择
Win Max 2是少数同时拥有MicroSD和标准尺寸SD读卡器的设备之一。不仅如此,它们的传输速率也彼此不同。我们在全尺寸读卡器上的UHS-II测试卡将显示239MB/s的传输速率,而在MicroSD读卡器上只有91MB/s。因此,在传输大文件时,你会想坚持使用全尺寸的SD插槽。
请记住,全尺寸SD卡必须颠倒着插入,而MicroSD卡应该是右侧插入,如GPD官方图片所示。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
GPD Win Max 2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
GPD Win 3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 32 GB UHS-II) | |
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3 (AV Pro V60) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 3 11IGL05 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
GPD Win Max 2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
GPD Win 3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 32 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 3 11IGL05 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3 (AV Pro V60) |
通信 - Wi-Fi 6E标准
当连接到我们的6GHz网络时,我们没有遇到任何性能问题。与去年Win Max中的英特尔7265相比,AX210是一个巨大的升级,它的速度只限于Wi-Fi 5。
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3 | |
GPD Win 3 | |
GPD Pocket 3 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 3 11IGL05 | |
GPD Win Max 2021 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
GPD Win 3 | |
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3 | |
GPD Pocket 3 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 3 11IGL05 | |
GPD Win Max 2021 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
GPD Win Max 2 |
网络摄像头
200万像素的摄像头是令人失望的,因为它的画质很差,而且沿着屏幕的底部边缘而不是顶部的位置不理想。它本质上是 "鼻腔摄像头 "的翻版。此外,没有隐私快门或Windows Hello红外支持。
维护
底部面板由13颗非常小的飞利浦螺钉固定,比较容易拆卸。然而,主要的问题是,广域网模块位于底板上,而不是主板上。因此,每当拆除底板时,连接广域网模块和主板的带状电缆必须被拆开。在重新组装时,将这条电缆重新连接到主板上是非常困难的,因为它很短。
配件和保修
除了交流电适配器和文件外,盒子里没有其他东西。如果在美国购买,有一年的有限保修期,但GPD说任何退货的运费都不包括在内。
输入设备 - 长时间握持很累人
控制器
控制器可以通过一个开关在两种模式之间切换。标准模式和游戏模式。当处于标准模式时,按钮默认设置为以下几种。
- 左边的操纵杆。W、A、S、D
- 右边的操纵杆。光标控制
- 左边的方向盘。原点
- 右侧方向键结束
- 上方向键和Y键。向上
- 下方向键和A键。向下
- X键。左边
- B键。右边
肩部按钮也有自己的功能,包括右键的Ctrl+Alt+Del。这里的问题是,很容易不小心按下肩部按钮,输入一些非预期的东西。没有专门的预装软件可以轻松地重新映射或禁用这些按钮。如果有第三种模式可以完全禁用控制器,那就更好了。
当处于游戏模式时,Windows会将按键识别为普通的XBox控制器,因此它们会被这样处理和映射。这里的按钮和操纵杆更接近于任天堂Joy-cons的感觉、大小和反馈,而不是更舒适的PS或XBox控制器。
键盘
键盘比原来的有所改进 Win Max在尺寸和布局方面有所改进。例如,数字键、Caps Lock和Shift键现在更大,更接近用户对QWERTY布局的期望。当然,反馈与大多数大型超极本相似,尽管更加拥挤。
键盘似乎有问题,可以同时识别2个以上的按键。例如,Fn+Alt+PrtSc,在我们的设备上无法注册。
触摸板
点击板是意料之中的小,只有7.0 x 4.1厘米,但它仍然比2021年Win Max上的5.8 x 3.3厘米的点击板大。当以中等或更高速度滑行时,牵引力是平稳的,而在较慢的速度下有一点粘性,可以更准确地点击。在点击板上的点击出乎意料地坚定,也有很强的反馈,但它的声音也因此很大。
显示屏 - 高分辨率与sRGB颜色
10.1英寸的触摸屏比2021年Win Max上的8英寸又有了巨大的改进。不仅边框更窄,而且面板提供了更好的颜色和更快的黑白响应时间,以获得更高质量的观看体验。然而,对比度和刷新率并没有改变。如果能在未来的机型上看到90赫兹或120赫兹的选项以及自适应同步的支持,那就太好了。
虽然该显示器在2560 x 1600的原生分辨率下非常清晰,但请记住,集成的GPU不够强大,无法在如此高的分辨率下流畅地运行大多数标题。
|
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 396.7 cd/m²
Contrast: 1102:1 (Black: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.31 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.44
ΔE Greyscale 5.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
66.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
91% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
69.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.17
GPD Win Max 2 Toshiba HX_10.1_LCD, IPS, 2560x1600, 10.1" | GPD Pocket 3 Digital Flat Panel, IPS, 1920x1200, 8" | GPD Win Max 2021 LT7911D, IPS, 1280x800, 8" | GPD Win 3 IPS, 1280x720, 5.5" | Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3 NV105WAM-N31, IPS , 1920x1280, 10.5" | Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 3 11IGL05 N116BCA-EA1, IPS LED, 1366x768, 11.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -22% | -30% | -8% | 4% | -30% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 69.8 | 51.1 -27% | 47.2 -32% | 59.5 -15% | 69 -1% | 45.35 -35% |
sRGB Coverage | 91 | 74.7 -18% | 65.2 -28% | 89.6 -2% | 99.1 9% | 67.7 -26% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 66.6 | 52.8 -21% | 47.6 -29% | 61.4 -8% | 69.8 5% | 46.93 -30% |
Response Times | -71% | -135% | -63% | -49% | -57% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 21.2 ? | 37.2 ? -75% | 56.8 ? -168% | 40 ? -89% | 37.2 ? -75% | 38 ? -79% |
Response Time Black / White * | 18.7 ? | 31.2 ? -67% | 37.6 ? -101% | 25.6 ? -37% | 22.8 ? -22% | 25 ? -34% |
PWM Frequency | 201.6 ? | 962 ? | 250 ? | |||
Screen | -13% | -34% | -24% | 36% | -9% | |
Brightness middle | 396.7 | 438.4 11% | 374.6 -6% | 468.8 18% | 418 5% | 270 -32% |
Brightness | 381 | 421 10% | 361 -5% | 460 21% | 415 9% | 259 -32% |
Brightness Distribution | 89 | 92 3% | 92 3% | 93 4% | 90 1% | 76 -15% |
Black Level * | 0.36 | 0.4 -11% | 0.45 -25% | 0.45 -25% | 0.28 22% | 0.195 46% |
Contrast | 1102 | 1096 -1% | 832 -25% | 1042 -5% | 1493 35% | 1385 26% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.31 | 5.02 20% | 6.21 2% | 9 -43% | 1.2 81% | 3.98 37% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.23 | 9.59 6% | 9.89 3% | 15.5 -52% | 2.6 75% | 8.46 17% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.44 | 4.05 -181% | 5.4 -275% | 1.91 -33% | 1 31% | 4 -178% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.5 | 4 27% | 4.5 18% | 10.9 -98% | 1.8 67% | 2.57 53% |
Gamma | 2.17 101% | 2.29 96% | 2.49 88% | 2.13 103% | 2.21 100% | 2.3 96% |
CCT | 7502 87% | 7087 92% | 6726 97% | 10972 59% | 6225 104% | 6332 103% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 56.6 | 43 | ||||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 89.2 | 67 | ||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -35% /
-23% | -66% /
-48% | -32% /
-26% | -3% /
17% | -32% /
-20% |
* ... smaller is better
这款显示器开箱后没有得到很好的校准,这是一个耻辱,因为它的sRGB覆盖面相对较广,超过90%。默认的平均灰度和色彩DeltaE值为5.5和6.31,在我们自己校准面板后,将分别提高到2.1和1.44。我们建议应用我们上面的校准过的ICM配置文件,以便从显示器上获得更准确的颜色。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
18.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9.1 ms rise | |
↘ 9.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 38 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
21.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9.5 ms rise | |
↘ 11.7 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 30 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
在最大400尼特的情况下,显示屏的亮度足以让人在阴暗处舒适地观看。更亮的环境光线会冲淡颜色,或在光亮的触摸屏上产生太强的眩光。
性能 - 红色还是蓝色?
测试条件
与其他GPD产品一样,BIOS屏幕提供可配置的TDP设置。三种预设模式分别是Nominal、Down和Up,每种模式都有不同的PL1和PL2目标水平,如下所述。
- 标称。PL1=24 W, PL2=28 W
- 向下:PL1=20 W,PL2=20 W
- 向上:PL1=28 W,PL2=35 W
在运行以下任何性能基准测试之前,我们将我们的设备设置为向上预设,并将风扇策略设置为性能。我们还启用了键盘上的 "涡轮 "设置,并确保Windows也处于性能模式。
处理器
多线程CPU性能大约比我们数据库中配备相同的笔记本电脑慢15%。 酷睿i7-1260P处理器。相反,单线程性能大约比平均水平快 10%至15%。肯定有一种感觉,Win Max 2在这方面没有完全利用英特尔新的第12代CPU的能力,但它仍然比GPD Win 3或Pocket 3上的旧的第11代CPU选项明显快50%或更多。然而,如果你想获得酷睿i7-1260P所能提供的最佳性能,那么你可能想转而关注成熟的笔记本电脑,如 戴尔Inspiron 16 7620二合一它可以将相同的CPU运行速度提高40%。
许多AMD Zen 3 CPU能够提供稍快的多线程性能,但比我们Win Max 2的Core i7-1260P的单线程性能要慢,包括Ryzen 5 5500U、Ryzen 7 5700U,甚至是较早的Zen 2 Ryzen 7 4800U.选择 Ryzen 7 6800USKU将使多线程性能提高50%,而单线程性能将下降近20%。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (1234 - 4748, n=25) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
GPD Win Max 2021 | |
Lenovo Yoga 6 13ALC6 | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
GPD Win 3 | |
Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 | |
GPD Pocket 3 | |
Infinix INBook X2 | |
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 3 11IGL05 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (448 - 698, n=25) | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
GPD Pocket 3 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
GPD Win 3 | |
Lenovo Yoga 6 13ALC6 | |
GPD Win Max 2021 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
Infinix INBook X2 | |
Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 | |
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 3 11IGL05 |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (3173 - 12150, n=27) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
GPD Win Max 2021 | |
Lenovo Yoga 6 13ALC6 | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
GPD Win 3 | |
Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 | |
GPD Pocket 3 | |
Infinix INBook X2 | |
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3 |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (1155 - 1812, n=25) | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
GPD Pocket 3 | |
GPD Win 3 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
Lenovo Yoga 6 13ALC6 | |
GPD Win Max 2021 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
Infinix INBook X2 | |
Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 | |
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (549 - 2034, n=29) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
GPD Win Max 2021 | |
Lenovo Yoga 6 13ALC6 | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
GPD Pocket 3 | |
GPD Pocket 3 | |
GPD Win 3 | |
Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 | |
Infinix INBook X2 | |
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 3 11IGL05 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (165.4 - 260, n=27) | |
GPD Pocket 3 | |
GPD Pocket 3 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
GPD Win 3 | |
Lenovo Yoga 6 13ALC6 | |
GPD Win Max 2021 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
Infinix INBook X2 | |
Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 | |
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 3 11IGL05 |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 3 11IGL05 | |
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3 | |
Infinix INBook X2 | |
GPD Pocket 3 | |
Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 | |
GPD Win 3 | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
GPD Win Max 2021 | |
Lenovo Yoga 6 13ALC6 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (264 - 906, n=26) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
Lenovo Yoga 6 13ALC6 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (16146 - 47064, n=25) | |
GPD Win Max 2021 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
GPD Win 3 | |
Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 | |
GPD Pocket 3 | |
Infinix INBook X2 | |
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 3 11IGL05 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (4064 - 5791, n=25) | |
GPD Pocket 3 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
GPD Win 3 | |
Lenovo Yoga 6 13ALC6 | |
GPD Win Max 2021 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 | |
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3 | |
Infinix INBook X2 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 3 11IGL05 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (3866 - 10570, n=25) | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
GPD Win 3 | |
Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 | |
Infinix INBook X2 | |
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 3 11IGL05 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (1436 - 1786, n=25) | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
GPD Win 3 | |
Infinix INBook X2 | |
Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 3 11IGL05 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (3.45 - 13.6, n=26) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
GPD Win Max 2021 | |
Lenovo Yoga 6 13ALC6 | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
GPD Win 3 | |
Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 | |
GPD Pocket 3 | |
Infinix INBook X2 | |
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 3 11IGL05 |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 3 11IGL05 | |
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3 | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
Infinix INBook X2 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
Lenovo Yoga 6 13ALC6 | |
GPD Win Max 2021 | |
Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
GPD Win 3 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (40.2 - 65.7, n=25) | |
GPD Pocket 3 | |
GPD Win Max 2 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 3 11IGL05 | |
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3 | |
Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 | |
Infinix INBook X2 | |
GPD Win 3 | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
GPD Win Max 2021 | |
GPD Pocket 3 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
Lenovo Yoga 6 13ALC6 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (0.4559 - 0.727, n=25) | |
GPD Win Max 2 |
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
GPD Win Max 2021 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
GPD Pocket 3 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
GPD Win Max 2021 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (2176 - 10898, n=26) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
GPD Pocket 3 | |
GPD Win Max 2 |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
GPD Win Max 2021 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (11015 - 56906, n=26) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
GPD Pocket 3 | |
GPD Win Max 2 |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (669 - 2709, n=26) | |
GPD Win Max 2021 | |
GPD Pocket 3 | |
GPD Win Max 2 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
GPD Win Max 2021 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (42571 - 82493, n=26) | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
GPD Pocket 3 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
GPD Win Max 2021 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (2901 - 6975, n=26) | |
GPD Pocket 3 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
GPD Win Max 2021 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (5950 - 26376, n=26) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
GPD Pocket 3 | |
GPD Win Max 2 |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
GPD Pocket 3 | |
GPD Win Max 2021 | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (16041 - 92356, n=26) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (259 - 771, n=26) | |
GPD Win Max 2021 | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
GPD Pocket 3 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
GPD Win Max 2021 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (1237 - 5858, n=26) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
GPD Pocket 3 | |
GPD Win Max 2 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
GPD Pocket 3 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (13261 - 43652, n=26) | |
GPD Win Max 2021 |
系统性能
PCMark 10得分通常高于任何GPD产品,在我们的Win Max 2之前,基本上与全尺寸笔记本电脑(如戴尔Inspiron 16 7620二合一)处于同等地位。有趣的是,原来由AMD驱动的Win Max有一个更高的生产力子得分,可能是由于其更快的多线程CPU性能。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (4796 - 6068, n=17) | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
GPD Win Max 2021 | |
GPD Pocket 3 | |
GPD Win 3 | |
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 3 11IGL05 |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
GPD Pocket 3 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (9260 - 11251, n=17) | |
GPD Win 3 | |
GPD Win Max 2021 | |
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 3 11IGL05 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
GPD Win Max 2021 | |
GPD Pocket 3 | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (6167 - 8629, n=17) | |
GPD Win 3 | |
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 3 11IGL05 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (5231 - 6908, n=17) | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
GPD Win Max 2021 | |
GPD Pocket 3 | |
GPD Win 3 | |
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 3 11IGL05 |
CrossMark / Overall | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1484 - 1811, n=16) |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1486 - 1755, n=16) |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1451 - 1872, n=16) | |
GPD Win Max 2 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1253 - 1807, n=16) |
PCMark 10 Score | 5431 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
GPD Pocket 3 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (25125 - 71544, n=25) | |
GPD Win Max 2021 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (24983 - 72065, n=25) | |
GPD Pocket 3 | |
GPD Win Max 2021 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
GPD Pocket 3 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (23512 - 66799, n=25) | |
GPD Win Max 2021 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
GPD Win Max 2021 | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
GPD Pocket 3 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (77.9 - 118.4, n=21) | |
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延时
LatencyMon显示,在我们的主页上打开多个浏览器标签或运行Prime95时,没有DPC问题。在60FPS下的4K视频播放也很流畅,没有丢帧。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3 | |
GPD Win Max 2021 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 3 11IGL05 | |
GPD Win 3 | |
GPD Pocket 3 | |
GPD Win Max 2 |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备 - 支持PCIe3和PCIe4
该模型可以支持多达两个PCIe4 x4固态硬盘,尽管我们的设备在发货时配备了一个 1TB BiWin NQ200PCIe3 x4驱动器。即便如此,我们的PCIe3驱动器在维持3300MB/s以上的传输率方面仍有问题,正如我们下面的DiskSpd循环测试所显示的那样,由于热限制。如果你决定安装PCIe4 x4硬盘,那么不要指望它能长期以其宣传的最大规格运行。
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
Average BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB | |
GPD Pocket 3 | |
GPD Win 3 | |
GPD Win Max 2021 | |
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 3 11IGL05 |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU性能 - Iris Xe比Radeon 680M更慢
尽管CPU性能比预期的要慢,但图形性能仍然出色。3DMark的结果比我们数据库中配备同样集成的笔记本电脑高出15%到20%。 Iris Xe 96 EUsGPU。这已经足够好,能够在中高设置下以1080p和30FPS运行一些旧的3D游戏,包括 Witcher 3但我们建议降低设置并启用vsync以使游戏体验更加流畅。不幸的是,该显示器不支持自适应同步,因为这样的功能在游戏中会有很大的帮助。
当与运行在GPD Win 3上的 Iris Xe 80EUs相比,我们的Win Max 2可以提供15%至30%的图形性能。选择了 AMD Radeon 680MSKU将比我们的英特尔SKU增加20%至30%的图形性能。
3DMark | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (2286 - 6482, n=215) | |
GPD Win 3 | |
GPD Win Max 2021 | |
Lenovo Yoga 6 13ALC6 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
GPD Pocket 3 | |
Infinix INBook X2 | |
Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 3 11IGL05 | |
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (707 - 1871, n=212) | |
GPD Win 3 | |
GPD Win Max 2021 | |
Lenovo Yoga 6 13ALC6 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
Infinix INBook X2 | |
GPD Pocket 3 | |
Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 | |
2560x1440 Time Spy Score | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (789 - 2133, n=209) | |
GPD Win 3 | |
GPD Win Max 2021 | |
Lenovo Yoga 6 13ALC6 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
Infinix INBook X2 | |
GPD Pocket 3 | |
Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (2867 - 7676, n=202) | |
GPD Win 3 | |
Lenovo Yoga 6 13ALC6 | |
GPD Win Max 2021 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
Infinix INBook X2 | |
GPD Pocket 3 | |
Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 | |
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 3 11IGL05 |
3DMark 11 Performance | 7251 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 22553 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 5171 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 1904 points | |
Help |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | |
1280x720 Lite Quality | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (14.9 - 56.5, n=183) | |
GPD Win 3 | |
GPD Win Max 2021 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
Lenovo Yoga 6 13ALC6 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
GPD Pocket 3 | |
Infinix INBook X2 | |
Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 | |
1920x1080 Standard Quality | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (10.5 - 31.2, n=179) | |
GPD Win 3 | |
GPD Win Max 2021 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
GPD Pocket 3 | |
Lenovo Yoga 6 13ALC6 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
Infinix INBook X2 | |
Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 | |
1920x1080 High Quality | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (8.15 - 27.8, n=172) | |
GPD Win 3 | |
GPD Win Max 2021 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
GPD Pocket 3 | |
Lenovo Yoga 6 13ALC6 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
Infinix INBook X2 | |
Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 |
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 | |
1280x720 Low Preset | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (20.6 - 44.7, n=17) | |
1920x1080 Low Preset | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (13 - 25.9, n=42) | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (10.8 - 21.7, n=37) | |
1920x1080 High Preset | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (9.8 - 16.9, n=34) | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED | |
GPD Win Max 2 | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (7.4 - 16.8, n=32) |
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 107.9 | 95.2 | 23 | 9.96 | 6.6 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 84.7 | 57 | 31.4 | 14.6 | |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 105.9 | 80.8 | 63.5 | 58.2 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 43.1 | 24.3 | 17.5 | ||
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 47.7 | 35 | 32.2 | ||
Strange Brigade (2018) | 85.1 | 42.1 | 33.8 | 27.3 | 20.1 |
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 20.4 | 17.3 | 13.3 | 10.7 |
排放
系统噪音--肯定比任天堂开关的声音大
在浏览或播放视频时,风扇噪音往往保持在22.7 dB(A)和28.5 dB(A)之间,背景是22.6 dB(A)。虽然不响亮或特别令人烦恼,但转速的变化可能是突然和明显的。
当运行在 Witcher 3在涡轮风扇模式下,风扇噪音最高只有40 dB(A),比我们在2021年的Win Max上所经历的要安静得多,当时风扇噪音可以达到49 dB(A)。40 dB(A)的低噪音范围是许多U系列电源笔记本电脑在运行重负荷时的典型情况,但由于小直径风扇的高频率,以及在游戏过程中设备离用户更近的事实,噪音在Win Max 2上又更加明显。我们发现在火车等公共场所的噪音水平是可以接受的。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23.7 / 23.7 / 28.5 dB(A) |
Load |
| 36.5 / 40.5 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 22.6 dB(A) |
GPD Win Max 2 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB | GPD Pocket 3 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1195G7, BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB | GPD Win Max 2021 Vega 8, R7 4800U, BIWIN NS200 512GB CNF82GS1G00-512 | GPD Win 3 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, BIWIN NS200 1TB CNF82GS1G02-1TB | Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -2% | -13% | -15% | 1% | |
off / environment * | 22.6 | 23.4 -4% | 23.3 -3% | 27.4 -21% | 22.9 -1% |
Idle Minimum * | 23.7 | 24.3 -3% | 26.6 -12% | 29.1 -23% | 23.3 2% |
Idle Average * | 23.7 | 25.6 -8% | 26.6 -12% | 29.1 -23% | 23.5 1% |
Idle Maximum * | 28.5 | 25.6 10% | 26.6 7% | 29.1 -2% | 23.5 18% |
Load Average * | 36.5 | 38.3 -5% | 46.9 -28% | 40.7 -12% | 33.2 9% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 39.8 | 40.7 -2% | 49 -23% | 42.8 -8% | 44.9 -13% |
Load Maximum * | 40.5 | 40.7 -0% | 49.2 -21% | 46.3 -14% | 44.6 -10% |
* ... smaller is better
温度--永远不会太热
与我们在2021年Win Max上观察到的情况一样,相对于其小尺寸和12代Core-P系列CPU,2022年Win Max 2的运行温度令人惊讶。游戏时,靠近设备后部的热点将分别达到28摄氏度和33摄氏度,在顶部和底部两侧。我们能够处理集成的操纵杆和按钮,而不会感到不舒服的温度。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 28.6 °C / 83 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.3 °C / 72 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 21.4 °C / 70.5 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (+6.9 °C / 12.4 F).
GPD Win Max 2 Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | GPD Win Max 2021 AMD Ryzen 7 4800U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) | Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3 Intel Core i3-10100Y, Intel UHD Graphics 615 | Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 3 11IGL05 Intel Celeron N4020, Intel UHD Graphics 600 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -30% | -17% | -21% | -16% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 28.6 | 40.4 -41% | 38 -33% | 46.1 -61% | 37.4 -31% |
Maximum Bottom * | 33 | 39.4 -19% | 36.4 -10% | 42.7 -29% | 41.4 -25% |
Idle Upper Side * | 24.6 | 32.6 -33% | 30 -22% | 25 -2% | 27.2 -11% |
Idle Bottom * | 27.6 | 34.4 -25% | 28 -1% | 25 9% | 27 2% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
启动Prime95来给CPU施加压力会发现一些不寻常的东西:高性能的P-cores会降频到只有400MHz,而高效的E-cores会运行在2.5GHz。相比之下,在联想Yoga 9 14上运行同样的测试 联想Yoga 9 14配备相同的CPU,将显示所有的P-cores和E-cores运行在1.7至1.9GHz范围内。这种行为可能是导致上述多线程性能慢于平均水平的原因。
在最初的几秒钟里,CPU包的功耗将高达35W,此后稳定在28W,这与预设的BIOS设置相符。相比之下,上述联想系统中的相同CPU在稳定在28W之前会提升到更高的64W。
当运行 Witcher 3芯片,GPU时钟速率和温度将分别稳定在898 MHz和71 C,而联想的是1147 MHz和65 C。因此,联想也能提供比我们的GPD高3%到5%的3DMark结果。
用电池供电运行不会降低CPU或GPU的性能。我们的3DMark 11得分在电池和主电源之间基本保持一致。
CPU时钟(GHz) | GPU时钟(MHz) | CPU平均温度(°C) | |
系统空闲 | -- | -- | 66 |
Prime95压力 | 0.4 | -- | 72 |
Prime95 + FurMark 压力 | 0.4 | 898 | 69 |
Witcher 3 应力 | ~0.4 - 2.0 | 898 | 71 |
发言人
GPD Win Max 2 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 69% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 56% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理
功率消耗 - 高性能,高功率成本
与去年的GPD产品相比,由于更大的屏幕尺寸、更高的原生分辨率和要求更高的英特尔第12代处理器,耗电量全面提高。运行时 Witcher 3将消耗约46W,比使用11代Tiger Lake-U CPU的Win 3高出近60%。幸运的是,制造商已经通过在Win Max 2中安装一个更大的电池组来说明更高的功耗,正如下面的部分所示。
我们能够从小型(约6.6 x 5.3 x 3.2厘米)100瓦的USB-C交流适配器上记录到76瓦的临时最大电流。该适配器也可用于为大多数其他USB-C设备快速充电。
Off / Standby | 0.63 / 0.65 Watt |
Idle | 5.8 / 10.2 / 11.5 Watt |
Load |
47.7 / 76.8 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
GPD Win Max 2 i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB, IPS, 2560x1600, 10.1" | GPD Pocket 3 i7-1195G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB, IPS, 1920x1200, 8" | GPD Win Max 2021 R7 4800U, Vega 8, BIWIN NS200 512GB CNF82GS1G00-512, IPS, 1280x800, 8" | GPD Win 3 i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, BIWIN NS200 1TB CNF82GS1G02-1TB, IPS, 1280x720, 5.5" | Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3 i3-10100Y, UHD Graphics 615, SK hynix HFB1M8MQ331C0MR, IPS , 1920x1280, 10.5" | Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 3 11IGL05 Celeron N4020, UHD Graphics 600, SanDisk DA4064, IPS LED, 1366x768, 11.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 1% | 28% | 45% | 55% | 66% | |
Idle Minimum * | 5.8 | 9.6 -66% | 5.2 10% | 2.9 50% | 2.6 55% | 2.4 59% |
Idle Average * | 10.2 | 11 -8% | 6.5 36% | 4.5 56% | 5.1 50% | 4.5 56% |
Idle Maximum * | 11.5 | 11.8 -3% | 7.4 36% | 4.5 61% | 5.9 49% | 4.6 60% |
Load Average * | 47.7 | 39 18% | 37.2 22% | 38.5 19% | 22.9 52% | 12.8 73% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 45.6 | 36.4 20% | 38.1 16% | 28.9 37% | ||
Load Maximum * | 76.8 | 42 45% | 39 49% | 41.4 46% | 24.6 68% | 14.3 81% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命--对尺寸来说很好
70Wh的电池对于这样一个小的外形尺寸来说是很大的。相比之下,原2021年的Win Max或11.6英寸的 联想IdeaPad Flex 3 11笔记本电脑将分别配备较小的57Wh和37Wh电池。
用户可以期待近9小时的实际浏览使用时间,在类似的负载下,与目前大多数超极本一样长,甚至更长。然而,游戏时间要短得多,只有大约2至3小时。
用附带的交流适配器从空电到满电大约需要1.5小时。
GPD Win Max 2 i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 70 Wh | GPD Pocket 3 i7-1195G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 39 Wh | GPD Win Max 2021 R7 4800U, Vega 8, 57 Wh | GPD Win 3 i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 44 Wh | Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3 i3-10100Y, UHD Graphics 615, 28 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 3 11IGL05 Celeron N4020, UHD Graphics 600, 37.5 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -31% | 6% | 3% | -20% | 6% | |
Reader / Idle | 923 | |||||
WiFi v1.3 | 523 | 360 -31% | 555 6% | 675 29% | 420 -20% | 555 6% |
Load | 103 | 79 -23% |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 与英特尔合作良好,与AMD合作更好
我们对2021年原版的Win Max并没有留下太深刻的印象。 原本2021年的Win Max.虽然它玩起来很有趣,但也很难看出它的色域窄,有明显的重影,笨拙的键盘布局,吱吱作响的机箱设计,缓慢的Wi-Fi,以及缺乏集成网络摄像头。2022年的Win Max 2已经解决了所有这些问题,其体验感觉与它的售价相称。在性能、显示质量和连接性方面,用户从这样一个小机箱中得到了更多。即使你不打算在Win Max 2上玩很多游戏,它的高分辨率触摸屏、4G LTE、出色的对接能力和紧凑的尺寸也肯定能在其他使用场景中派上用场。
GPD Win Max 2通过提供英特尔和AMD选项和更高质量的机箱,以及充满活力的1600p IPS触摸屏,做对了很多事情。
然而,如果你要玩游戏,你要记住,AMD SKU可以以同样的价格提供更快的性能,但代价是放弃对Thunderbolt的支持。相对较重的系统和不理想的操纵杆位置使操作比在较轻的任天堂Switch或其他游戏中更累人。 Win 3.一些奇怪的设计选择,如倒置的USB和HDMI端口,难以连接的WAN带状电缆,以及无法轻松禁用肩部按钮,都是一些需要处理的小麻烦。 我们很想在未来看到120赫兹的OLED,甚至可能是更轻的设计,以便更舒适的手持游戏。
价格和可用性
截至本文写作时,GPD正在为Win Max 2进行Indiegogo。英特尔和AMD SKU预计将在9月推出,每款价格为1000美元。
GPD Win Max 2
- 07/09/2022 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo