英特尔酷睿i7-1260P首次亮相。联想Yoga 9 14IAP7敞篷车评测
今年的Yoga 9 14在2022年的CES上亮相,通过引入全新的机箱设计和新的第12代Alder Lake-P处理器选项来取代第11代Tiger Lake-U系列,继承了去年的机型。配置方面,有酷睿i7-1260P处理器,8至16GB LPDDR5-5200内存,以及2400p(4K)OLED、1800p(2.8K)OLED或1200p IPS触摸屏。评论中的单元是带有2.8K OLED触摸屏的中间配置。
这个领域的竞争者包括其他高端次笔记本转换器,如华硕Zenbook Flip 14,戴尔XPS 13二合一,微星Summit E13 Flip,或惠普Spectre x360 14。
本评论页将更多关注2.8K OLED显示屏和处理器的性能,对该机型的4K OLED版本的全面评论即将到来。2.8K和4K SKU在其他方面的视觉效果是相同的。
更多联想评论。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
89.8 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2022 | Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.4 kg | 15.25 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
84.8 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2022 | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 R9 5900HS, GeForce MX450 | 1.4 kg | 17.9 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
89.5 % v7 (old) | HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.3 kg | 16.9 mm | 13.50" | 3000x2000 | ||
86.7 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2021 | Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.3 kg | 14.35 mm | 13.40" | 1920x1200 | |
86.5 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2022 | Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W R7 5800H, Vega 8 | 1.4 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
82.3 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2021 | MSI Summit E14 A11SCS i7-1185G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | 1.3 kg | 16 mm | 14.00" | 3840x2160 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
案例------圆形是英寸
从视觉上看,与去年的Yoga 9 14相比,现在的机身边缘和角落更圆润、更光滑。它的设计与惠普Spectre的设计截然相反,后者使用了更尖锐、更明确的 "钻石切割 "边缘和角落。
连接性 - 无处不在的USB
请记住,只有左边的两个USB-C端口与Thunderbolt 4兼容,而右边的USB-C端口则不兼容。除此之外,所有三个端口都与DisplayPort和Power Delivery兼容。
沟通
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng |
网络摄像头
一个210万像素的摄像头是标准配置,而大多数笔记本电脑仍在使用100万像素的传感器。除了物理相机快门,还支持Windows Hello。
维护
底板不容易拆卸。用户必须首先拧开底板上的6颗Torx螺丝,再加上隐藏在橡胶脚下的额外飞利浦螺丝。除了M.2 2280固态硬盘之外,没有什么可以升级的,因为内存和WLAN模块都焊接在电路板上。
配件和保修
标准的一年有限保修期适用。尽管现在的笔库已经不复存在,但每个零售盒中都包括一个保护性的手提箱和主动式触控笔。
输入设备 - 经典IdeaPad
显示屏 - 2.8K OLED,90 Hz,全DCI-P3颜色
2022年的Yoga 9i 14使用的2.8K OLED LEN140WQ+面板与Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14上的完全相同。瑜伽瘦身7专业版14.因此,核心属性,如非常快的响应时间,90赫兹的原始刷新率,完整的DCI-P3色彩覆盖,出色的亮度均匀性和深黑色水平在它们之间非常相似。它们甚至以400尼特的最大亮度为目标。客观上,图像质量优于大多数甚至所有14英寸IPS替代品。
有几个注意事项要记住。不幸的是,在这个模型上,颗粒感是一个问题,因此文本和图像看起来不像在光面IPS替代品上那样清晰。这个问题在显示全白背景,然后仔细观察屏幕的时候最明显。其次,脉宽调制存在于所有的亮度水平,除了在0%时,这意味着一小部分用户可能对闪烁的亮度敏感。
有趣的是,我们测试装置上的面板被设置为60赫兹。用户可能想检查显示设置,以确保90赫兹被启用。
|
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 367.3 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.21
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US Lenovo LEN140WQ+, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 LEN140WQ+, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 Sharp LQ134N1, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.4" | Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W SDC4154, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | MSI Summit E14 A11SCS AU Optronics AUO123B, IPS, 3840x2160, 14" | Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P LEN140WQUXGA, OLED, 3840x2400, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -0% | -19% | 0% | -4% | -0% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 99.8 | 99.9 0% | 69.7 -30% | 99.7 0% | 87.5 -12% | 98.7 -1% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 100 0% | 99 -1% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 99.8 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 98.7 | 97.6 -1% | 71.7 -27% | 98.6 0% | 99.4 1% | 98.5 0% |
Response Times | -65% | -2393% | -67% | -3350% | -99% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 1.2 ? | 2.4 ? -100% | 55.6 ? -4533% | 2 ? -67% | 52 ? -4233% | 2.8 ? -133% |
Response Time Black / White * | 1.2 ? | 2.4 -100% | 40.4 ? -3267% | 2 ? -67% | 30.8 ? -2467% | 2.8 ? -133% |
PWM Frequency | 347.2 ? | 362.3 ? 4% | 2500 ? 620% | 239.2 ? -31% | ||
Screen | 25% | -5% | 16% | 20% | 17% | |
Brightness middle | 367.3 | 399 9% | 555.7 51% | 366 0% | 593.3 62% | 361 -2% |
Brightness | 369 | 401 9% | 528 43% | 369 0% | 571 55% | 362 -2% |
Brightness Distribution | 97 | 98 1% | 90 -7% | 96 -1% | 87 -10% | 98 1% |
Black Level * | 0.001 | 0.35 | 0.53 | 0.001 | ||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.2 | 2.5 52% | 4.83 7% | 2.84 45% | 4.42 15% | 2.8 46% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.04 | 4.6 43% | 8.46 -5% | 5.29 34% | 7.16 11% | 5.8 28% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.8 | 1.8 36% | 6.1 -118% | 2.32 17% | 3.2 -14% | 1.9 32% |
Gamma | 2.21 100% | 2.17 101% | 1.98 111% | 2.44 90% | 2.04 108% | 2.16 102% |
CCT | 5992 108% | 6368 102% | 6686 97% | 6170 105% | 6737 96% | 6181 105% |
Contrast | 399000 | 1588 | 1119 | 361000 | ||
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.2 | 0.76 | 2.81 | 4.3 | ||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -13% /
-4% | -806% /
-606% | -17% /
-4% | -1111% /
-599% | -27% /
-16% |
* ... smaller is better
该模型在出厂时没有进行校准,这与许多为图形艺术家服务的高端专业消费者笔记本电脑不同。尽管如此,平均灰度和色彩的DeltaE值仍然是体面的,分别为2.8和5.2。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
1.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.4 ms rise | |
↘ 0.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
1.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.6 ms rise | |
↘ 0.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 347.2 Hz | ≤ 100 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 347.2 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 347.2 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
性能 - 酷睿i7-1260P留下痕迹
测试条件
在运行以下任何基准测试之前,我们通过Windows将我们的设备设置为性能模式,并通过联想Vantage设置为极限性能模式。建议用户熟悉Vantage软件,因为关键的系统功能和关键的更新在这里被切换。
处理器
有趣的是,原始多线程性能比配备相同的酷睿i7-1260P CPU但分辨率更高的2400p显示屏的相同机型慢了约10%。尽管如此,它仍然明显快于第11代 酷睿i7-1165G7中的 氙气14在单线程和多线程工作负载中分别快了约20%和40%。
性能的可持续性很好,但并不完美。我们在循环运行CineBench R15 xT时,最初的得分是1461分,在随后的运行中会下降约7%,表明涡轮增压的潜力很短暂。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P | |
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (2176 - 10898, n=26) | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (11015 - 56906, n=26) | |
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (669 - 2709, n=26) | |
HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (42571 - 82493, n=26) | |
HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (2901 - 6975, n=26) | |
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (5950 - 26376, n=26) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (16041 - 92356, n=26) | |
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (259 - 771, n=26) | |
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (1237 - 5858, n=26) | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (13261 - 43652, n=26) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W |
系统性能
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (4796 - 6068, n=17) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (9260 - 11251, n=17) | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng | |
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (6167 - 8629, n=17) | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (5231 - 6908, n=17) | |
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1484 - 1811, n=16) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1486 - 1755, n=16) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1451 - 1872, n=16) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1253 - 1807, n=16) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 |
PCMark 10 Score | 5488 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (25125 - 71544, n=25) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (24983 - 72065, n=25) | |
HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS | |
HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (23512 - 66799, n=25) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (77.9 - 118.4, n=21) |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延时
LatencyMon显示,在打开我们主页的多个浏览器标签时,存在轻微的DPC问题。4K视频播放在其他方面都很完美,处理器利用率低,没有丢帧。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备--PCIe4 x4成为标准配置
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU性能--迄今最快的集成Iris Xe解决方案之一
而CPU的性能比预期的略微慢一些,集成的 Iris Xe 96 EUsGPU的性能明显更快。3DMark结果比具有相同集成GPU的普通笔记本电脑高出约15%至25%。
3DMark 11 Performance | 7592 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 22087 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 5284 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 2001 points | |
Help |
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 109.2 | 91.7 | 23.6 | 9.73 | 6.6 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 88.1 | 60.8 | 32.4 | 15.2 | |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 113.1 | 85.6 | 63.9 | 58.4 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 44.2 | 25 | 17.1 | ||
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 51.9 | 42.2 | 37.5 | ||
Strange Brigade (2018) | 85.2 | 40.8 | 31 | 26.7 | 19.6 |
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 20.3 | 17.2 | 13.5 | 13.5 | 6.7 |
排放
系统噪音 - 大部分时间都很安静
在运行高要求的应用程序时,联想系统能够保持更长时间的安静。例如,当运行3DMark 06时,在第一个基准场景结束时,风扇噪音最高只有33 dB(A),而惠普Spectre x360的风扇噪音则为38 dB(A)或40 dB(A)。HP Spectre x360 14或戴尔XPS 13 9310 2合1分别为38 dB(A)和40 dB(A)。然而,在运行这样的高负荷一段时间后,风扇噪音将最终稳定在45 dB(A),对于一台可转换的笔记本电脑来说是相当大的。简而言之,Yoga 9 14在压力较小的任务中能保持安静,但在需要的时候,它也不回避大声说话。
如果限制风扇噪音比性能更重要,请确保通过联想Vantage将系统设置为智能冷却或电池节约。当不设置为极端性能模式时,风扇的脉冲频率会降低。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23.3 / 23.5 / 23.5 dB(A) |
Load |
| 33.2 / 44.6 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 22.9 dB(A) |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 GeForce MX450, R9 5900HS, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N | HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 1TB HBRPEKNX0203AH(L/H) | Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZPZ512G | Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W Vega 8, R7 5800H, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7 | MSI Summit E14 A11SCS GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i7-1185G7, Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -8% | -7% | -2% | -11% | -12% | |
off / environment * | 22.9 | 24.7 -8% | 26 -14% | 24.3 -6% | 26 -14% | 23.9 -4% |
Idle Minimum * | 23.3 | 24.7 -6% | 26 -12% | 24.8 -6% | 26 -12% | 24.2 -4% |
Idle Average * | 23.5 | 24.7 -5% | 26 -11% | 24.8 -6% | 26 -11% | 24.2 -3% |
Idle Maximum * | 23.5 | 27.3 -16% | 26 -11% | 24.8 -6% | 27.3 -16% | 24.2 -3% |
Load Average * | 33.2 | 41 -23% | 37.5 -13% | 38 -14% | 39.8 -20% | 50.2 -51% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 44.9 | 43.5 3% | 38 15% | 47 -5% | ||
Load Maximum * | 44.6 | 43.5 2% | 36.3 19% | 41.5 7% | 42.4 5% | 51.7 -16% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
由于内部的冷却解决方案,温度发展基本上是对称的。靠近键盘中心的热点在重载时可以达到43℃,与惠普Spectre x360 14在类似条件下相当。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.2 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.6 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29 °C / 84.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (-1 °C / -1.8 F).
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) | MSI Summit E14 A11SCS Intel Core i7-1185G7, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -1% | 15% | 9% | -1% | -9% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 43.2 | 44.5 -3% | 37.1 14% | 51 -18% | 42.7 1% | 49.4 -14% |
Maximum Bottom * | 45.6 | 56.4 -24% | 43.1 5% | 45.4 -0% | 53.1 -16% | 60.6 -33% |
Idle Upper Side * | 34.6 | 29.1 16% | 29 16% | 24.4 29% | 32.9 5% | 30.6 12% |
Idle Bottom * | 37 | 34 8% | 28.6 23% | 27.4 26% | 35.2 5% | 37.4 -1% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
当运行Prime95时,CPU时钟速率将提升到3.1GHz,核心温度为100C,持续几秒钟,然后迅速下降到更稳定的2.0GHz和66C范围。在测试开始时,CPU封装的功耗将高达64W,然后稳定在27.8W。 XPG Xenia 14进行同样的测试,使用较早的酷睿i7-1165G7 CPU将导致更高的时钟速率和核心温度,分别为3.2 GHz和90 C。很明显,这里的Yoga 9 14敞篷车对其酷睿i7-1260P CPU采取了更加保留的做法,以保持皮肤温度更加舒适。
运行时的GPU时钟速率、内存时钟速率和核心温度 Witcher 3将分别稳定在1147 MHz、2593 MHz和66 C左右,而上述Xenia 14的时钟频率为1300 MHz、2000 MHz和66 C。明显较高的内存时钟弥补了较慢的核心时钟,因为我们的联想在游戏时仍能输出比Xia 14更高的帧率。
在电池上运行可能会影响CPU性能,但不会影响GPU性能。在电池上运行Fire Strike ,物理和图形分数分别为21530和5377分,而在主电源上运行时,物理和图形分数为19302和5654分。
CPU时钟(GHz) | GPU时钟(MHz) | CPU平均温度(°C) | |
系统空闲 | -- | -- | 48 |
Prime95压力 | 2.0 | -- | 66 |
Prime95 + FurMark 压力 | 1.2 | 748 | 66 |
Witcher 3 应力 | ~1.8 | 1147 | 65 |
发言人
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (7.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理
耗电量--对于14英寸的可折叠机来说有点高
有趣的是,尽管这一特定配置的2.8K显示屏分辨率较低,但在低负荷时,功耗略高于我们的另一个2022年Yoga 9 14测试配置。这种差异可能部分地解释了我们下一节中较短的电池寿命。
运行游戏或其他苛刻的负载将消耗54瓦至60瓦,比大多数其他运行在11代酷睿U系列处理器上的14英寸笔记本电脑高,没有独立显卡。该 氙气14例如,在类似的条件下,仅消耗约45W。随后,CPU和GPU性能的逐代提高是以略高的功耗为代价的。
在运行Prime95时,我们能够从小型(约8.8 x 5 x 2.2厘米)65瓦的USB-C交流适配器中记录到68瓦的临时最大功耗。由于开销较低,预计在运行高要求的负载时,电池充电速度会变慢。
Off / Standby | 0.28 / 0.51 Watt |
Idle | 8 / 14 / 14.4 Watt |
Load |
59.6 / 68.1 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, OLED, 3840x2400, 14" | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 R9 5900HS, GeForce MX450, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZPZ512G, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.4" | Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W R7 5800H, Vega 8, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | MSI Summit E14 A11SCS i7-1185G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162, IPS, 3840x2160, 14" | ADATA XPG Xenia 14 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, ADATA XPG Gammix S50 Lite 512GB, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 5% | -23% | 48% | 15% | -36% | 35% | |
Idle Minimum * | 8 | 7.1 11% | 9.5 -19% | 2.6 67% | 6.4 20% | 9.9 -24% | 2.9 64% |
Idle Average * | 14 | 10 29% | 14.1 -1% | 6.4 54% | 9.4 33% | 17.4 -24% | 5.5 61% |
Idle Maximum * | 14.4 | 10.8 25% | 14.9 -3% | 7.7 47% | 10.7 26% | 22.5 -56% | 5.9 59% |
Load Average * | 59.6 | 64 -7% | 79.5 -33% | 29.9 50% | 52.2 12% | 85.6 -44% | 44.4 26% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 53.6 | 47.7 11% | 73.5 -37% | 32.2 40% | 53 1% | 70.9 -32% | 46.6 13% |
Load Maximum * | 68.1 | 97 -42% | 98.5 -45% | 47.5 30% | 69 -1% | 91.1 -34% | 76.4 -12% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命
当设置为平衡和智能冷却电源配置文件,屏幕设置为150尼特时,我们能够记录6小时45分钟的WLAN运行时间。有趣的是,即使经过重复测试,结果也比我们在类似设置下的4K配置上记录的时间短了近2小时。
使用随附的适配器,将电池从空到满需要不到2小时。
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 75 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 75 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 R9 5900HS, GeForce MX450, 61 Wh | Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 51 Wh | Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W R7 5800H, Vega 8, 63 Wh | MSI Summit E14 A11SCS i7-1185G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, 52 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 28% | -19% | 59% | 29% | -33% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 405 | 517 28% | 327 -19% | 643 59% | 522 29% | 271 -33% |
H.264 | 758 | 542 | ||||
Load | 98 | 205 | 124 | 58 | ||
Reader / Idle | 1525 | 396 |
Pros
Cons
Verdict — Portable Without Sacrificing Power
在第10代Ice Lake ,并在第11代Tiger Lake-U中重新站起来之后,英特尔到目前为止在其第12代Alder Lake-P平台上显示出了希望。特别是多线程性能比流行的酷睿i7-1165G7快得多,而单线程和GPU性能看到了较小但并非不重要的提升。功耗似乎因此而略高,但每瓦性能仍比上一代高。
与竞争对手AMD Ryzen 7 5800U相比,Core i7-1260P在性能基准测试中以明显的优势击败了它,但在多线程应用中,AMD的八个核心有优势。预计AMD将在未来几个月内推出移动Ryzen 6000U系列及其改进的集成Radeon图形。
至于联想Yoga 9 14本身,我们有点失望地看到,它已经放弃了内置的笔库,这使得 去年的Yoga 9 14独一无二。然而,如果你不怀念这个特殊的功能,那么这款笔记本电脑的其他部分是一个不错的改进,包括其转向16:10。我们建议先仔细观察一下OLED显示屏,看看它的颗粒感是否可以被排除在外。
价格和可用性
联想目前正在运送基本配置的Yoga 9 14IAP7,配备1200p IPS触摸屏,价格为1080美元。更多的配置和选项预计将在未来几周内推出。我们的2.8K OLED SKU将在百思买上市。