三星Galaxy A03 智能手机评测--价格低廉的Galaxy ，具有快速的无线网络。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 74.6 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2022 | Samsung Galaxy A03 T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1 | 196 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.50" | 1600x720 | |
| 73.6 % v7 (old) | 12 / 2021 | Samsung Galaxy A03s Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320 | 196 g | 32 GB eMMC Flash | 6.50" | 1600x720 | |
| 75.1 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2022 | Motorola Moto G22 Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320 | 185 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.50" | 1600x720 | |
| 77 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2022 | Nokia G11 T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1 | 190 g | 32 GB eMMC Flash | 6.50" | 1600x720 |
外壳和设备 - 更多的内存和快速的microSD读取器
三星有几款入门级手机，而Galaxy A03是目前最便宜的手机之一。因此，韩国人只能以不到160欧元的价格提供一个相当简单的塑料外壳，这并不令人惊讶。相较于 Galaxy A03s相比，它提供了一个相当别致的交叉线图案。外壳的稳定性也给人以高质量的感觉，所以智能手机几乎不能被扭曲。然而，正面的压力会很快传到屏幕上。
与去年相比，在重量和尺寸方面没有任何变化。
Galaxy A03比它的前辈提供了更多的存储空间：它有64GB的大容量存储和4GB的内存，但它在欧洲并没有变得更加昂贵。同样，有NFC，在这个价格范围内不一定是理所当然的事。然而，在USB端口方面有一个退步，似乎有点令人费解：现在又安装了一个微型USB端口，而不是USB-C端口，其插头不能从各个方向插入。现在是时候让制造商在廉价手机中也最终埋葬这个过时的USB端口了。
微型SD读卡器与两个SIM卡插槽分开。它在复制测试和CPDT基准测试中都取得了非常好的速率，因此microSD卡可以很好地用于内存扩展。
| SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A03 (Angelbird V60) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A03s (Angelbird V60) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (7.7 - 77, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Nokia G11 (Angelbird V60) | |
| Motorola Moto G22 (Angelbird V60) | |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
通信、软件和操作 - 最后的WiFi 5
如果 Galaxy A03s只配备了WiFi 4，后续产品终于有了WiFi 5，现在即使在廉价的入门级产品中也很常见。Galaxy A03表现良好，但在传输速率上有两个轻微的下降。
LTE频率仍然不多，所以国外的移动互联网成为一场赌博。在我们的测试中，接收情况总体上是不错的，但Galaxy A03确实在个别时候出现了信号不足的情况。
Android 11与三星OneUI 3.1被预装在智能手机上。在我们的测试中，我们收到了5月份的最新安全补丁的更新。根据三星的说法， 12仍将到来，但在今年下半年之前不应指望它。此外， 13可能将在明年为这款手机发布。Android Android
60赫兹的触摸屏可以快速操作。指纹传感器是完全没有的。解锁只能通过面部识别，但这只是一个有点不安全的软件解决方案，不能用于直接解锁网上银行等应用程序。
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A03s | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A03s | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| Motorola Moto G22 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A03 | |
| Nokia G11 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Motorola Moto G22 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A03 | |
| Nokia G11 | |
照相机 - 不再有微距相机
Galaxy A03的摄像系统与A03的摄像系统相比，是前进了一步还是退步了一步？ Galaxy A03s?这是一个有趣的问题，乍一看很难回答：一方面，相机的分辨率大大提高，达到4800万像素，但另一方面，它通常只使用四分之一的分辨率，但由于像素较大，感光度更高。此外，Galaxy A03不再有一个专门的微距相机。
让我们仔细看看图像质量：在直接比较中，两款智能手机的照片看起来非常相似。Galaxy A03再次提供了体面的动态效果，即使在更困难的情况下，但细节很快就会模糊不清。额外的感光性在照片中几乎看不出来。与高端手机相机相比，明显较低的图像清晰度和像素化区域是明显的。
视频仍然可以以最高1080p和30帧的速度录制。自动对焦和曝光补偿的速度令人满意，但图像清晰度在低光下迅速下降，视频开始出现噪音。总的来说，这两代智能手机在摄影方面处于差不多的水平。
用500万像素的前置摄像头拍摄的照片相当不错，但动态范围可以更高，你不应该把照片放大太多，因为细节会丢失。不过，自拍是可以用于社交媒体的。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain cameraLow Light
显示屏 - 更加明亮，但有蓝色偏光
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 443 cd/m²
Contrast: 1641:1 (Black: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.99 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 6.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.174
| Samsung Galaxy A03 PLS, 1600x720, 6.5" | Samsung Galaxy A03s PLS, 1600x720, 6.5" | Motorola Moto G22 IPS LCD, 1600x720, 6.5" | Nokia G11 IPS, 1600x720, 6.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response Times | 4% | 8% | 6% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 58 ? | 54 ? 7% | 46 ? 21% | 48 ? 17% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 32 ? | 32 ? -0% | 34 ? -6% | 34 ? -6% |
| PWM Frequency | 807 ? | |||
| Screen | -12% | -15% | -16% | |
| Brightness middle | 443 | 383 -14% | 451 2% | 502 13% |
| Brightness | 419 | 354 -16% | 431 3% | 486 16% |
| Brightness Distribution | 90 | 88 -2% | 90 0% | 89 -1% |
| Black Level * | 0.27 | 0.34 -26% | 0.5 -85% | 0.53 -96% |
| Contrast | 1641 | 1126 -31% | 902 -45% | 947 -42% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.99 | 5.09 -2% | 5.82 -17% | 5.73 -15% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.01 | 9.25 -3% | 9.3 -3% | 8.72 3% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.4 | 6.5 -2% | 5 22% | 6.8 -6% |
| Gamma | 2.174 101% | 2.261 97% | 2.776 79% | 2.352 94% |
| CCT | 8495 77% | 8152 80% | 7683 85% | 8800 74% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -4% /
-9% | -4% /
-11% | -5% /
-12% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 13 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 58 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 27 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 31 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 94 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能、排放和电池寿命 - 更大的功率，更多的运行时间
使用 统一的T606作为SoC，三星为Galaxy A03做出了一个坚实的选择，这意味着与A03s相比有明显的性能优势。 Galaxy A03s.这款智能手机在日常使用中更加灵活，在一个有点复杂的背景应用程序中不会立即下降到膝盖上。照片有时在网站上加载得相当快，所以用Galaxy A03浏览也会相当不错。
要求高的游戏玩家将不得不另寻他处，但那些只想玩愤怒的小鸟或糖果粉碎机等较简单游戏的人将获得足够的性能。
eMMC存储在这个价格范围内也很常见，但与更高端的智能手机相比，它的速度仍然很烦人，而且明显延长了加载时间和数据传输。
长时间的高负荷导致明显的发热，但它仍然在可接受的范围内。
底部边缘的单声道扬声器是非常重的高音，不能真正在较长时间内提供良好的音乐质量。机上有一个3.5毫米音频插孔和蓝牙5.0，可以通过它们轻松连接外部音频设备。然而，最新的aptX编解码器不能用于蓝牙。
5,000毫安时的电池足以保证良好的运行时间，但比前代产品的运行时间短很多。然而，18:17小时的无线网络冲浪，你也应该在手机的中等负荷下度过两个工作日。充电的最大功率为7.8瓦，所以当手机没电时，你不应该着急：充满电可能需要3小时。
| GFXBench | |
| on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A03 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A03s | |
| Motorola Moto G22 | |
| Nokia G11 | |
| Average Unisoc T7200 (T606) (5.1 - 11, n=18) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 166, n=207, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A03 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A03s | |
| Motorola Moto G22 | |
| Nokia G11 | |
| Average Unisoc T7200 (T606) (1.9 - 5.5, n=18) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 321, n=207, last 2 years) | |
| on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A03 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A03s | |
| Motorola Moto G22 | |
| Nokia G11 | |
| Average Unisoc T7200 (T606) (0.85 - 7.3, n=18) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 144, n=207, last 2 years) | |
| 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A03 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A03s | |
| Motorola Moto G22 | |
| Nokia G11 | |
| Average Unisoc T7200 (T606) (0.85 - 2.1, n=18) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 129, n=207, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A03 | Samsung Galaxy A03s | Motorola Moto G22 | Nokia G11 | Average 64 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -16% | -42% | -7% | -14% | 519% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 250 | 279.8 12% | 215.45 -14% | 252.7 1% | 274 ? 10% | 1882 ? 653% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 188.3 | 86.8 -54% | 112.78 -40% | 187.6 0% | 176.6 ? -6% | 1467 ? 679% |
| Random Read 4KB | 70.5 | 64 -9% | 39.32 -44% | 48.2 -32% | 59.4 ? -16% | 278 ? 294% |
| Random Write 4KB | 56.5 | 48.7 -14% | 16.34 -71% | 59 4% | 32.2 ? -43% | 310 ? 449% |
温度
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.3 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.9 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.4 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
演讲者
Samsung Galaxy A03 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 38.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (31.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 78% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 89% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Nokia G11 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 70% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电池寿命
| Samsung Galaxy A03 5000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A03s 5000 mAh | Motorola Moto G22 5000 mAh | Nokia G11 5050 mAh | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | |||||
| WiFi Websurfing | 1097 | 1193 9% | 1101 0% | 1053 -4% | 991 ? -10% |
Pros
Cons
结论--老问题过去了，新问题来了
三星通过Galaxy A03向正确的方向迈出了一步，并再次接近了竞争对手。尽管Galaxy A03绝不是性价比的赢家，但它是一款可靠的入门级手机，终于也提供了更快的网络、更多的内存和合理的性能率。
电池运行时间也仍然令人信服，但前代的 Galaxy A03s仍然有鼻子有眼。你还得到了一个快速的microSD读卡器，一个在这个价格范围内还算不错的主摄像头，以及一个相当明亮的无PWM显示屏。
长的运行时间和良好的系统性能使Galaxy A03成为一款体面的入门级手机。然而，在购买之前，你应该考虑这款智能手机的问题所在。
我们对重新引入的microUSB端口、充电速度慢、可用的LTE频率少以及缺少指纹传感器感到恼火。总而言之，这款价格低廉的Galaxy 手机提供了一些好的和坏的特征，所以你应该在购买前仔细检查你是否能接受这些缺点。
更具说服力的是 诺基亚G11：它可以通过指纹解锁，甚至提供90赫兹的屏幕，但我们不喜欢它的相机。廉价的小米红米手机也是一个很好的选择；其中一些手机提供更多的功能。
价格和可用性
在测试时，三星Galaxy A03在网上的售价约为137欧元。另外。amazon.com和notebooksbilliger.de也有该设备的报价。
Samsung Galaxy A03
- 06/03/2022 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt
Price comparison
