三星Galaxy A13 4G A137F智能手机评测--有了联发科就更好了
潜在的竞争对手比较
Bewertung | Datum | Modell | Gewicht | Laufwerk | Groesse | Aufloesung | Preis ab |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 77.3 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2022 | Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2 | 195 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.60" | 2408x1080 | |
| 76.5 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2022 | Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1 | 195 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.60" | 2408x1080 | |
| 74.4 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2022 | Xiaomi Poco C40 JR510, Mali-G52 MP1 | 204 g | 32 GB eMMC Flash | 6.71" | 1650x720 | |
| 75.1 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2022 | Motorola Moto G22 Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320 | 185 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.50" | 1600x720 |
机箱和特点 - 普通塑料机箱
三星在几个月后发布一个新版本的智能手机并不罕见。这通常伴随着不同的SoC。在这种情况下，型号为A137F的Galaxy A13 4G新版现在有一个联发科处理器。
韩国市场部将外壳描述为 "极简风格"，委婉地代表了非常简单、有光泽的塑料。黑色、白色或浅蓝色的机壳很容易沾染指纹，但它相当稳定，几乎不允许压力到达显示屏。
最初的 Galaxy A13 4G变体具有相同的外壳，在尺寸或重量方面没有任何变化。
三星提供三种配置的变体。配备32GB大容量存储的入门级机型也只提供3GB的内存。配置较好的64GB和128GB大容量存储的机型各有4GB的工作内存。我们测试的是64GB的型号。
我们喜欢的是，尽管价格低，但三星使用了USB-C，还安装了NFC模块，这样就可以使用移动支付服务，比如说。
microSD读卡器与两个SIM卡插槽是分开的。我们用Angelbird V60参考卡测试了读卡器的速度，A137F在复制测试中比原版略慢一些 Galaxy A13 4G.另一方面，在CPDT基准测试中，这款手机的速度更快，但带来的数值有些不一致。在日常使用中，读卡器的感知速度应该在一个类似的水平上。
| SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A13 4G (Angelbird V60) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F (Angelbird V60) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (7.7 - 77, n=81, last 2 years) | |
| Motorola Moto G22 (Angelbird V60) | |
| Xiaomi Poco C40 (Angelbird V60) | |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
通信、软件和操作 - 仍有少量的LTE频率
在Wi-Fi速度方面没有什么变化：新版也以Wi-Fi 5作为最快的标准，提供相当稳定的传输速率，在Wi-Fi上的速度与原版相似。 Galaxy A13 4G和其他同价位的手机一样快。
虽然新的SoC实际上会支持更多的LTE频段，但新的Galaxy A13也只与最必要的频段进行通信，以便能够在欧洲操作。因此，只要你到其他国家旅行，你就必须仔细看看是否支持移动互联网的必要频率。
三星再次安装了基于Android 12的OneUI 4。安全更新是在测试时从2022年10月开始的，因此是相对最新的。还宣布了对Android 13的更新。
尽管是60赫兹的屏幕，但手机可以相当流畅地操作，而且在新的SoC下感觉反应更加灵敏。这款手机可以通过外壳右侧待机按钮中的指纹传感器解锁。这并不是100%的可靠，但大部分时间都能工作，而且速度也相当快。
通过前置摄像头的人脸识别也是可用的，而且在良好的照明条件下也能令人满意地工作。
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| Motorola Moto G22 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F | |
| Xiaomi Poco C40 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A13 4G | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A13 4G | |
| Motorola Moto G22 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F | |
| Xiaomi Poco C40 | |
相机 - 5000万像素，动态范围尚可
同样，与前代产品相比没有任何变化：与许多廉价的三星手机一样，内部的Isocell JN1传感器被用作主摄像头。它的最大分辨率为5000万像素，但通常只用它的四分之一拍照，尽管有更大和更敏感的像素。
该相机显示出平庸的图像清晰度，但在动态方面提供了一个体面的平衡，特别是在低光下。就其低廉的价格范围而言，主摄像头的表现一点也不差。
甚至在Galaxy A13 4G新版中也安装了一个广角镜头，但它的分辨率和它的姐妹机型一样相当低。它对漂亮的快照来说是足够的，但它不能满足更高的要求。
带有800万像素的前置摄像头可以使用更多的光敏感度，但在良好的照明条件下，它可以拍摄体面的自拍。然而，在黑暗地区几乎没有任何绘画。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain cameraLow LightUltra wide-angle
显示屏 - 全高清屏幕，亮度较低
尽管PLS屏幕的规格为2,408 x1,080像素和60赫兹的面板在开始时听起来是一样的，但显示效果在两个型号之间显示出轻微的差异。
然而，新机型并没有完全达到 Galaxy A13 4G配备Exynos SoC。453 cd/m²的数值并不差，但仍然明显低于前代产品。
同样，没有使用PWM来调暗屏幕。因此，敏感的人应该能够毫无问题地使用该显示屏。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 492 cd/m²
Contrast: 1330:1 (Black: 0.37 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.34 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 4.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.398
| Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F PLS, 2408x1080, 6.6" | Samsung Galaxy A13 4G PLS, 2408x1080, 6.6" | Xiaomi Poco C40 IPS, 1650x720, 6.7" | Motorola Moto G22 IPS LCD, 1600x720, 6.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response Times | 9% | 6% | -11% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 39 ? | 47 ? -21% | 40 ? -3% | 46 ? -18% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 33 ? | 20 ? 39% | 28 ? 15% | 34 ? -3% |
| PWM Frequency | ||||
| Screen | -7% | -14% | -22% | |
| Brightness middle | 492 | 553 12% | 468 -5% | 451 -8% |
| Brightness | 453 | 506 12% | 450 -1% | 431 -5% |
| Brightness Distribution | 87 | 87 0% | 92 6% | 90 3% |
| Black Level * | 0.37 | 0.44 -19% | 0.4 -8% | 0.5 -35% |
| Contrast | 1330 | 1257 -5% | 1170 -12% | 902 -32% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.34 | 4.64 -7% | 4.53 -4% | 5.82 -34% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.94 | 7.86 -32% | 8.96 -51% | 9.3 -57% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.7 | 5.6 -19% | 6.5 -38% | 5 -6% |
| Gamma | 2.398 92% | 2.18 101% | 2.191 100% | 2.776 79% |
| CCT | 7668 85% | 8002 81% | 8122 80% | 7683 85% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 1% /
-4% | -4% /
-10% | -17% /
-20% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 33 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 18 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 88 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 39 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 16 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 55 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能、排放和电池寿命--为经济型手机提供更多动力
两款A13 4G机型之间最大的区别体现在性能上：A13 4G机型的 Helio G80在我们的基准测试中，新版的Helio G80提供了相当多的能量，与其他价格范围内的设备相比也很突出。
更快的处理器也确保了日常使用中更流畅的体验，无论是浏览互联网、菜单，还是应用程序。数据存储仍然很慢，但在这个价格范围内，只有少数智能手机能提供更快的存储模块。
在室温下，较长负荷下的发热是明显的，但并不令人不快。采用联发科SoC的Galaxy A13 4G即使在长时间负载下也能保持其全部性能。
下部边缘的单声道扬声器高音偏重，缺乏大量的丰富性，但至少可以很好地再现语音。然而，我们建议使用耳机听音乐。新的SoC提供了一个3.5毫米的音频端口，以及一个更现代的蓝牙5.2。新版中的编解码器种类也非常有限。
同样，有一个5000毫安时的电池，它提供了良好的运行时间，甚至略高于 Galaxy A13 4G在我们的WLAN测试中，它甚至略高于采用Exynos SoC的A13 4G。不到15个小时的时间应该足以应付一个密集的工作日，甚至在适度使用的情况下，两天没有电源插座也是可能的。虽然SoC会支持更高的充电速度，但最多只能达到15瓦，而且新版中也没有包含充电器。
| GFXBench | |
| on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 166, n=207, last 2 years) | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G80 (7.5 - 18, n=11) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F | |
| Motorola Moto G22 | |
| Xiaomi Poco C40 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A13 4G | |
| 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 321, n=207, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G80 (8.2 - 9.2, n=11) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A13 4G | |
| Motorola Moto G22 | |
| Xiaomi Poco C40 | |
| on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
| Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 144, n=207, last 2 years) | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G80 (4.8 - 11, n=11) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F | |
| Motorola Moto G22 | |
| Xiaomi Poco C40 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A13 4G | |
| 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
| Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 129, n=207, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G80 (3.1 - 3.3, n=11) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A13 4G | |
| Motorola Moto G22 | |
| Xiaomi Poco C40 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F | Samsung Galaxy A13 4G | Xiaomi Poco C40 | Motorola Moto G22 | Average 64 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 6% | -27% | -53% | -29% | 417% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 300.6 | 308.5 3% | 281.7 -6% | 215.45 -28% | 274 ? -9% | 1887 ? 528% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 230.3 | 236.8 3% | 129.8 -44% | 112.78 -51% | 176.6 ? -23% | 1471 ? 539% |
| Random Read 4KB | 94.5 | 104.4 10% | 29.2 -69% | 39.32 -58% | 59.4 ? -37% | 278 ? 194% |
| Random Write 4KB | 61.5 | 67.3 9% | 67.7 10% | 16.34 -73% | 32.2 ? -48% | 311 ? 406% |
温度
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.1 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.3 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.6 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
演讲者
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 55% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 72% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Motorola Moto G22 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 64% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 79% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电池寿命
| Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing | |
| Xiaomi Poco C40 | |
| Motorola Moto G22 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (476 - 3244, n=209, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F | |
| Samsung Galaxy A13 4G | |
Pros
Cons
裁决--权力属于Galaxy
主要是更高的性能使Galaxy A13 4G A137F优于其姐妹机型：一切都运行得更顺畅一些，你有更多的储备用于更复杂的应用程序，尽管该设备当然仍然不是一个动力源，而是用于简单的应用程序。
两个版本之间的其他差异仅限于较低的屏幕亮度和电池寿命，新的SoC使其略有改善。遗憾的是，三星没有利用SoC的可能性来提高充电速度和更多的LTE频率。
总的来说，比起仍在销售的采用Exynos SoC的Galaxy A13 4G，我们更喜欢新版。然而，如果你买到更便宜的旧版，其差异也不足以证明强烈的附加费用。
联发科SoC使Galaxy A13 4G更加强大，但与Exynos机型的差异则相当小。
这款手机的运行时间 小米Poco C40的运行时间明显更长，但你必须忍受更低的性能。小米 摩托罗拉的Moto G22有较低的分辨率，但有90Hz的面板。
价格和可用性
如果你想购买配备快速联发科处理器的三星Galaxy A13 4G版本，你应该注意添加 "新版 "和/或型号为A137F。这款手机可以直接从制造商那里获得https://www.samsung.com/de/smartphones/galaxy-a/galaxy-a13-light-blue-64gb-sm-a137flbveub/buy/所有颜色，64GB版本的价格为148欧元。
较小的32GB版本可以在互联网上的零售商处找到，例如在我们的贷款人notebooksbilliger.de。.它的价格是150欧元，所以在测试时，三星的商店提供了一个更好的交易，存储量更大。64GB版本在notebooksbilliger.de的价格略低于170欧元，128GB版本的价格是190欧元。
此外，在其他零售商如Cyberport或 amazon.com在测试时，这款手机也有库存。
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F
- 11/07/2022 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt
Price comparison
