Notebookcheck Logo

三星Galaxy A13 5G智能手机评测--现代蜂窝技术在一个简单的包装中的应用

妥协以换取5G。

大多数最便宜的5G智能手机起价仅高于200美元,这包括我们的Galaxy A13 5G。一个简单的外壳和低存储容量是权衡的结果。这值得吗?
5G Android ARM Smartphone
三星Galaxy A13 5G

我们审查了 三星Galaxy A13 4G我们在2022年5月审查了三星A13 4G,发现它在一个基本的情况下提供了不合格的性能和一个高分辨率的明亮显示屏。现在,这款智能手机的5G版本也以比A13 4G高出60美元的价格上市。 Galaxy A13 4G.

制造商是否成功地创造了一个负担得起的5G手机,就像例如 Poco X4 Pro 5G?乍一看似乎不太可能,因为它使用了与它的4G兄弟姐妹一样的简单外壳,甚至省略了一个摄像头。

让我们详细看看这款廉价的5G智能手机,并确定它是否在其价格范围内做得很好,或者是否被削减了太多的角落。

Samsung Galaxy A13 5G (Galaxy A Series)
Processor
MediaTek Dimensity 700 8 x 2 - 2.2 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55
Graphics adapter
Memory
4 GB 
Display
6.50 inch 20:9, 1600 x 720 pixel 270 PPI, PLS, glossy: yes, 90 Hz
Storage
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 50 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5mm audio jack, Card Reader: microSD (dedicated, up to 1TB), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B17/​B20/​B26/​B28/​B38/​B40/​B41/​B66), 5G (n1/​n3/​n5/​n7/​n8/​n20/​n28/​n38/​n40/​n41/​n78) , Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.8 x 164.5 x 76.5
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 15-watt charging
Operating System
Android 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix f/​1.8, phase comparison-AF, LED-flash, Videos @1080p/​30fps (camera 1); 2.0MP, f/​2.4, macro lens (camera 2); 2.0MP, f/​2.4, depth of field (camera 3)
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix f/2.0
Additional features
Speakers: Mono speaker, USB cable, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, SAR: 0.845W/​kg (head), 1.332W/​kg (body) , fanless
Weight
195 g
Price
249 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
77.9 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2022
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2
195 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.50"1600x720
79.6 %
v7 (old)
08 / 2021
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2
203 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.60"2400x1080
76.5 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2022
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1
195 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.60"2408x1080
82.5 %
v7 (old)
07 / 2022
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
SD 695 5G, Adreno 619
205 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"2400x1080
78.5 %
v7 (old)
07 / 2022
Honor X8
SD 680, Adreno 610
177 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.70"2388x1080
80.8 %
v7 (old)
07 / 2022
Motorola Moto G42
SD 680, Adreno 610
175 g64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.43"2400x1080

如前所述,三星Galaxy A13 5G在视觉上与它便宜的4G兄弟姐妹非常相似。然而,外壳采用了磨砂质地,使其不太容易受到指纹的影响。三个摄像头排列在一条直线上,没有任何更高的设计追求。

虽然外壳在压力下略有屈服,并且可以从角落里小幅度扭曲,但它提供了良好的建造质量和良好的操作。这款智能手机的重量为195克(约6.88盎司),就其尺寸而言,并不完全是一种重量。

三星Galaxy A13 5G
三星Galaxy A13 5G
三星Galaxy A13 5G
三星Galaxy A13 5G
三星Galaxy A13 5G
三星Galaxy A13 5G

尺寸比较

167.2 mm 76.4 mm 9 mm 203 g165.1 mm 76.4 mm 8.8 mm 195 g164.5 mm 76.5 mm 8.8 mm 195 g164.19 mm 76.1 mm 8.12 mm 205 g163.4 mm 74.7 mm 7.45 mm 177 g160.6 mm 73.5 mm 8.3 mm 175 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

连接性--在美国只有一种存储选项

虽然国际版有两种存储配置,但目前只有低端型号在美国上市。

  • 64GB存储/4GB内存:229欧元,国际版
  • 128GB存储/4GB内存:259欧元,国际版
  • 64GB存储/4GB内存:249美元,美国版

4G和5G机型之间的价格差异约为60美元。不幸的是,三星继续依赖缓慢的eMMC存储,而其他制造商已经能够在相同的价格范围内提供更快的存储。

左边:SIM卡和microSD插槽
左边:SIM卡和microSD插槽
右边。音量摇杆,集成指纹传感器的待机按钮
右边。音量摇杆,集成指纹传感器的待机按钮
首页: 麦克风
首页: 麦克风
底部。扬声器、USB Type-C端口、麦克风、3.5毫米音频插孔
底部。扬声器、USB Type-C端口、麦克风、3.5毫米音频插孔

微型SD卡读卡器

由于有一个专门的microSD读卡器,所以可以同时使用两张SIM卡和一张容量高达1TB的microSD卡。我们参考的Angelbird V60 microSD卡和Galaxy A13 5G的结果是混合的。虽然它们在CPDT基准测试中表现相当好--尽管有严重的波动--但在复制测试中的传输速度相对缓慢。总的来说,当涉及到数据传输时,用户不应期待最高速度。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)
44 MB/s +208%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)
34.3 MB/s +140%
Motorola Moto G42
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)
28.2 MB/s +97%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)
14.3 MB/s
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
11.84 MB/s -17%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

0102030405060708090100Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø37.9 (30.5-48.3)
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø28.8 (15.3-45.8)
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø30.8 (17.6-38.8)
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø34.4 (23.3-43)
Motorola Moto G42 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø32.1 (23.8-43.1)
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø74.6 (44.2-104.8)
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø70.7 (11.8-76.8)
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø50 (37.9-54.4)
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø76.2 (32.4-83)
Motorola Moto G42 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø76.4 (30-87.4)

软件 - 许多预装的应用程序

三星Galaxy A13 5G配备了Android 12和制造商自己的OneUI。虽然Android 13可能最终会作为主要更新提供给三星的非常便宜的智能手机,但明年的Android 14也不一定是这样。

安全补丁可以追溯到2022年9月,使它们变得相当新。三星承诺4年的更新,目前每3个月交付一次,这很可能会改变为每半年一次,因为大多数旧的三星设备都是这样的。

有许多预装的应用程序。由于这包括制造商自己的应用程序,这些应用程序复制了谷歌股票应用程序的功能,如三星浏览器,用户可能希望首先清理手机以拥有更多存储空间。还有许多第三方应用程序,尽管如果需要的话,它们可以被快速删除。

软件 三星Galaxy A13 5G
软件 三星Galaxy A13 5G
软件 三星Galaxy A13 5G

通信和GNSS - 5G支持快速网络浏览

当然,这款价格低廉的三星手机的主要亮点是它的5G能力,这在这个价格范围内远远不是标准,因为诸如 Honor X8摩托罗拉Moto G42显示。

此外,Galaxy A13 5G支持大范围的4G频率,使其适合在旅行中访问移动网络。也就是说,由于全球使用的几个频段缺失,用户应该事先确定手机是否能在目的地使用。

这款智能手机支持Wi-Fi标准,最高包括Wi-Fi 5。与其价格范围内的其他手机相比,传输速率良好且稳定。我们使用我们的参考路由器华硕ROG Rapture AXE11000进行测试。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone
  (34.8 - 1875, n=184, last 2 years)
714 MBit/s +112%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
337 (289min - 349max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
328 (300min - 339max) MBit/s -3%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
322 (124min - 352max) MBit/s -4%
Honor X8
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
247 (47min - 312max) MBit/s -27%
Motorola Moto G42
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
234 (203min - 256max) MBit/s -31%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone
  (40.5 - 1810, n=186, last 2 years)
729 MBit/s +98%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
368 (355min - 384max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
356 (293min - 370max) MBit/s -3%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
349 (317min - 362max) MBit/s -5%
Motorola Moto G42
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
305 (269min - 336max) MBit/s -17%
Honor X8
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
303 (108min - 372max) MBit/s -18%
iperf3 transmit AX12
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
348 (340min - 353max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
361 (322min - 366max) MBit/s
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360380Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø336 (289-349)
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø368 (355-384)
室外的GPS测试
室外的GPS测试
可用的卫星网络
可用的卫星网络

在户外,A13 5G能够快速定位我们,精确度在2米以内。这是一个很好的结果,特别是考虑到检测到的各种卫星网络,甚至包括SBAS网络,以提高精度。然而,我们很快就会看到,不幸的是,智能手机在实践中无法将其理想的起点转化为精确的卫星导航能力。

在我们的实际测试中,我们带着智能手机去骑自行车。为了进行比较,我们还带着Garmin Venu 2智能手表作为参考点。结果是。三星Galaxy A13 5G并不总是能够产生令人信服的结果,与我们的路线有一些明显的偏差,而Garmin手表取得的结果要准确得多。尽管我们的测试设备仍能定位我们的大致位置,但真正精确的地理定位并不在其专业领域内。

地理定位 三星Galaxy A13 5G - 概述
地理定位 三星Galaxy A13 5G - 概述
地理定位 三星Galaxy A13 5G - 转向
地理定位 三星Galaxy A13 5G - 转向
Geolocation SamsungGalaxy A13 5G - Bridge
Geolocation SamsungGalaxy A13 5G - Bridge
地理定位 Garmin Venu 2 - 概述
地理定位 Garmin Venu 2 - 概述
地理定位 Garmin Venu 2 - 转弯
地理定位 Garmin Venu 2 - 转弯
地理定位 Garmin Venu 2 - Bridge
地理定位 Garmin Venu 2 - Bridge

电话和通话质量 - 信号强度差

虽然三星使用自己的电话应用,但如果需要,也可以安装其他应用。支持VoLTE和Wi-Fi通话。虽然与高端设备相比,4G网络内的信号强度较弱,并经常下降到50%以下,但在我们的测试中,它从未完全断开连接。

使用听筒时的通话质量很一般:虽然它可以变得非常响亮,但这时附近的每个人都能听到谈话内容。这也导致我们的对话伙伴的声音在我们的耳边缭绕,尽管它仍然明显可闻,但高频率部分变得更加明显。虽然我们的声音被麦克风很好地捕捉到了,但音量还可以再大一点。

通过免提模式下的免提电话,声音听起来不那么明显,但仍然很清晰。在这里,我们也不能说得太小声,以便让电话那头的人听到我们的声音。

相机 - 没有广角相机

用前置摄像头拍摄的照片
用前置摄像头拍摄的照片

不像 Galaxy A13 4G,5G机型没有配备广角摄像头,而且前置摄像头的像素较少。相机规格在其他方面是相同的:50万像素的主相机来自三星自己,默认拍摄12.5万像素的照片,以增加光线的产量。另外,也可以使用全分辨率。

与更高级的传感器相比,用主摄像头拍摄的照片在细节和亮度方面都有所欠缺。这种现象在我们的花卉场景中特别明显,而在明亮的日光下的城市场景似乎更容易被原谅。考虑到智能手机的低价格,该相机处理非常低的光线和鲜明的对比度令人惊讶地好。许多区域被很好地提亮,尽管也有明显的像素伪影,与昂贵的iPhone相比,锐度更差。

视频可以以高达1080p和30FPS的速度录制。相机对环境亮度的变化做出了快速反应。同样,自动对焦总体表现良好,尽管有时需要一秒钟的时间来调整。背面的另外两个摄像头只有200万像素的分辨率,每个都包括一个微距镜头,由于分辨率低,最多只适合快照,还有一个用于虚化效果的辅助摄像头,它不能单独拍摄照片。

同时,Galaxy 5G正面的水滴式凹槽包含一个500万像素的自拍相机。它提供了良好的增亮功能,在白天也能拍出可靠的自拍。由于物体的边缘往往在某些时候变得难以分辨,所以它不适合高倍放大。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera flowerMain camera cityMain camera low light


ColorChecker
6.1 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
9 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
7 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
1.5 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy A13 5G: 7.68 ∆E min: 1.45 - max: 13.68 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.1 ∆E
50.9 ∆E
38.5 ∆E
34.1 ∆E
44.3 ∆E
58 ∆E
48.8 ∆E
33.7 ∆E
39.2 ∆E
28.2 ∆E
60.5 ∆E
60.5 ∆E
30.3 ∆E
45.2 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
71.6 ∆E
42 ∆E
40.9 ∆E
73.5 ∆E
67.6 ∆E
50.1 ∆E
36.4 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy A13 5G: 43.97 ∆E min: 13.38 - max: 73.52 ∆E

配件和保修 - 不包括充电器

纤细的包装中没有包括充电器--相反,交货范围只包括一条USB线和一个SIM卡工具。在我们的测试中,这款智能手机至少可以接受我们尝试过的所有充电器,没有任何问题。

三星提供了一个标准的一年有限 保修在美国。

输入设备和处理 - 响应式指纹传感器

三星Galaxy A13 5G的触摸屏的整个表面区域是可靠和精确的。这款Galaxy 手机采用了90Hz的屏幕,由于屏幕的采样率较高,这似乎能带来更流畅的用户体验。

物理按钮仅限于一个凹陷的待机按钮和一个音量摇杆。它们很容易找到,对于左撇子用户来说位置很好,而且它们提供了一个明显的启动点。

指纹传感器被集成到待机按钮中,对有效的指纹几乎是即时响应。最近使用的屏幕基本上会立即出现在手机上,即使是在待机状态下。

面部识别也可用于解锁手机,尽管这需要合适的照明,而手机可以通过屏幕提供。虽然这种认证方法在不涉及太阳镜或面罩的情况下也相当可靠,但由于其纯粹的软件实现,它不是很安全。

键盘纵向模式
键盘纵向模式
键盘横向模式
键盘横向模式

显示屏 - 少数像素的PLS屏幕

子像素阵列
子像素阵列

Galaxy A13 5G的PLS面板最引人注目的特点是其1600 x 720像素的低分辨率,即使是这个价格范围也被认为是过时的。诸如下列设备 摩托G42Poco X4 Pro甚至在这两种情况下,提供的AMOLED屏幕的最大亮度明显高于我们测试设备的显示屏。

这款 Galaxy A13 4G的屏幕也会明显变亮。虽然Galaxy A13 5G可以在户外使用,但我们建议用户在明亮的日子里保持在阴凉处,以使屏幕内容保持可见。

428
cd/m²
464
cd/m²
433
cd/m²
416
cd/m²
471
cd/m²
429
cd/m²
413
cd/m²
476
cd/m²
407
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 476 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 437.4 cd/m² Minimum: 2.4 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 471 cd/m²
Contrast: 1519:1 (Black: 0.31 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.43 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 5.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
89.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.12
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
PLS, 1600x720, 6.5"
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.6"
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
PLS, 2408x1080, 6.6"
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Honor X8
TFT-LCD, 2388x1080, 6.7"
Motorola Moto G42
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.4"
Screen
-1%
1%
56%
-12%
60%
Brightness middle
471
415
-12%
553
17%
687
46%
510
8%
691
47%
Brightness
437
378
-14%
506
16%
694
59%
469
7%
699
60%
Brightness Distribution
86
76
-12%
87
1%
96
12%
78
-9%
95
10%
Black Level *
0.31
0.26
16%
0.44
-42%
0.82
-165%
Contrast
1519
1596
5%
1257
-17%
622
-59%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
5.43
5.41
-0%
4.64
15%
1.2
78%
2.5
54%
1.02
81%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
10.55
9.77
7%
7.86
25%
4
62%
5.8
45%
1.73
84%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
5.1
4.8
6%
5.6
-10%
1
80%
4.1
20%
1
80%
Gamma
2.12 104%
2.348 94%
2.18 101%
2.16 102%
2.45 90%
2.205 100%
CCT
7465 87%
7748 84%
8002 81%
6496 100%
6307 103%
6621 98%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

我们示波器的测试结果显示没有使用PWM。然而,CalMAN和我们的分光光度计显示了严重的颜色偏差和显示器中的明显色调。

橙色、棕色和红色与目标色彩空间中的对应颜色相差特别大。这使得在显示器上判断颜色变得困难。

CalMAN灰度
CalMAN灰度
CalMAN颜色精度
CalMAN颜色精度
卡尔曼色彩空间sRGB
卡尔曼色彩空间sRGB
卡尔曼色彩空间 AdobeRGB
卡尔曼色彩空间 AdobeRGB
卡尔曼色彩空间 DCI P3
卡尔曼色彩空间 DCI P3
卡尔曼饱和度
卡尔曼饱和度

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
29 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 13 ms rise
↘ 16 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 75 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
41 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 24 ms rise
↘ 17 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 61 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

在某个角度观看时,屏幕的颜色几乎没有变化,图像总体上仍然清晰可见。

户外使用
户外使用
视角
视角

性能 - 强大的Galaxy A13 5G

芯片 联发科Dimensity 700对于这个价格范围内的手机来说,是一个很好的SoC选择。虽然该处理器速度很快,但它仍然无法跟上最强大的竞争对手。在系统基准测试中,缓慢的存储有助于获得低分。

在日常使用中,该系统很流畅,偶尔会出现短暂的打嗝。然而,在要求较高的情况下,没有很多性能储备。这导致在高要求的应用程序运行时,音量控制会出现延迟。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=172, last 2 years)
995 Points +124%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
694 Points +56%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
564 Points +27%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (445 - 574, n=9)
531 Points +19%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
445 Points
Honor X8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 6144
379 Points -15%
Motorola Moto G42
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
376 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
155 Points -65%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6687, n=172, last 2 years)
3312 Points +209%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2038 Points +90%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1712 Points +60%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (1071 - 1775, n=9)
1601 Points +49%
Motorola Moto G42
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1583 Points +48%
Honor X8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 6144
1571 Points +47%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1071 Points
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
586 Points -45%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (99654 - 1650926, n=104, last 2 years)
798401 Points +228%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
383847 Points +58%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (243323 - 356312, n=5)
305947 Points +26%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
287506 Points +18%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
243323 Points
Motorola Moto G42
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
238371 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
134832 Points -45%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 24088, n=190, last 2 years)
12976 Points +86%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
10571 Points +52%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (6492 - 10433, n=11)
8048 Points +16%
Honor X8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 6144
7645 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
7434 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
6962 Points
Motorola Moto G42
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
6176 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
4966 Points -29%
CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 1517, n=157, last 2 years)
884 Points +138%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
604 Points +63%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (371 - 534, n=5)
496 Points +34%
Honor X8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 6144
413 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
371 Points
Motorola Moto G42
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
325 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
254 Points -32%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 11976, n=151, last 2 years)
6297 Points +125%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3794 Points +36%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3005 Points +8%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (2779 - 3107, n=8)
2926 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2794 Points
Motorola Moto G42
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
2564 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
1594 Points -43%
System
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 16475, n=151, last 2 years)
10163 Points +107%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
7736 Points +57%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
6486 Points +32%
Motorola Moto G42
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
5852 Points +19%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (4888 - 6712, n=8)
5669 Points +15%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
4917 Points
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
3112 Points -37%
Memory
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 12716, n=151, last 2 years)
6767 Points +77%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4593 Points +20%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
4473 Points +17%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (3685 - 4473, n=8)
4100 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3824 Points
Motorola Moto G42
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
3669 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
1744 Points -54%
Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=151, last 2 years)
16908 Points +567%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4401 Points +74%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (2398 - 2676, n=8)
2572 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2535 Points
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2398 Points -5%
Motorola Moto G42
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
2181 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
1237 Points -51%
Web
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2145, n=151, last 2 years)
1564 Points +22%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1283 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1279 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (1083 - 1353, n=8)
1237 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1172 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
930 Points -27%
Motorola Moto G42
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
923 Points -28%
AImark - Score v2.x
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
8794 Points +114%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (4108 - 12011, n=5)
8418 Points +105%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
5839 Points +42%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
4354 Points +6%
Motorola Moto G42
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
4320 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
4108 Points

该SoC使用 ARM Mali-G57 MP2GPU。它足以满足1440p和30FPS的视频播放,尽管播放4K视频不一定是无卡顿的体验。也就是说,无论如何,对于一个拥有720p显示屏的设备来说,后者是一个不太可能的情况。

屏幕的低分辨率也是该GPU在屏幕基准测试中取得良好成绩的原因。正如固定分辨率下的屏幕外测试所显示的那样,与竞争对手相比,整体性能水平还是不错的。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1073 Points +244%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
371 Points +19%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
312 Points
Honor X8
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
124 Points -60%
Motorola Moto G42
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
362 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
326 Points
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
139 Points -57%
Honor X8
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
127 Points -61%
Motorola Moto G42
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
125 Points -62%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
100 Points -69%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1227 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1116 Points
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1074 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
509 Points -54%
Motorola Moto G42
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
443 Points -60%
Honor X8
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
442 Points -60%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1292 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1203 Points
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1094 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
513 Points -57%
Honor X8
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
456 Points -62%
Motorola Moto G42
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
445 Points -63%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2736 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2698 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2612 Points
Motorola Moto G42
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2476 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2177 Points -17%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2731 Points +17%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2330 Points
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2141 Points -8%
Motorola Moto G42
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1121 Points -52%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
799 Points -66%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2738 Points +15%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2387 Points
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2244 Points -6%
Motorola Moto G42
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1276 Points -47%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
930 Points -61%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3512 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
3350 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
3179 Points
Motorola Moto G42
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2814 Points -11%
Honor X8
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2571 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2054 Points -35%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2998 Points +29%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2331 Points
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2290 Points -2%
Motorola Moto G42
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1191 Points -49%
Honor X8
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1186 Points -49%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
791 Points -66%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3092 Points +25%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2478 Points
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2463 Points -1%
Motorola Moto G42
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1366 Points -45%
Honor X8
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1347 Points -46%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
916 Points -63%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2983 Points +24%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2415 Points
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2360 Points -2%
Motorola Moto G42
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1339 Points -45%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
888 Points -63%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2836 Points +23%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2303 Points
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2217 Points -4%
Motorola Moto G42
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1170 Points -49%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
771 Points -67%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3527 Points +21%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
3047 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2908 Points
Motorola Moto G42
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2707 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1899 Points -35%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
82 fps +26%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
65 fps
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
52 fps -20%
Motorola Moto G42
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
35 fps -46%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
22 fps -66%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
94 fps +45%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
65 fps
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
61 fps -6%
Motorola Moto G42
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
41 fps -37%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
25 fps -62%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
58 fps
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
42 fps -28%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
33 fps -43%
Motorola Moto G42
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps -66%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
14 fps -76%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
47 fps +21%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
39 fps
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
37 fps -5%
Motorola Moto G42
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
22 fps -44%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
16 fps -59%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
48 fps
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
30 fps -37%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
21 fps -56%
Motorola Moto G42
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps -71%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8.2 fps -83%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
35 fps +40%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
25 fps
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
24 fps -4%
Motorola Moto G42
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps -40%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
9.4 fps -62%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
25 fps
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps -32%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
11 fps -56%
Motorola Moto G42
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7.4 fps -70%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
5.1 fps -80%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps +33%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
15 fps
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
14 fps -7%
Motorola Moto G42
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.3 fps -45%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
6.1 fps -59%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
17 fps
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
12 fps -29%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8.1 fps -52%
Motorola Moto G42
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5 fps -71%
Honor X8
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4.6 fps -73%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
3.3 fps -81%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.1 fps +45%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
5.6 fps
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
5.5 fps -2%
Honor X8
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3.2 fps -43%
Motorola Moto G42
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3.2 fps -43%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2.2 fps -61%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
28 fps
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps -32%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
13 fps -54%
Motorola Moto G42
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.5 fps -70%
Honor X8
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
7.8 fps -72%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
5.3 fps -81%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
21 fps +31%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
16 fps
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
15 fps -6%
Motorola Moto G42
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
9.7 fps -39%
Honor X8
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
9.5 fps -41%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
6.1 fps -62%

我们的浏览器基准测试表明,廉价的智能手机可以让人有流畅的网络浏览体验。在实践中,网页加载很快,而图像在滚动时往往略有延迟。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=161, last 2 years)
120.4 Points +125%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro (Chrome 103)
64.534 Points +20%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G (Chrome 106)
53.56 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (36 - 58.2, n=8)
45.6 Points -15%
Motorola Moto G42 (Chrome 103.0.5060.71)
41.845 Points -22%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G (Chrome 92)
38.21 Points -29%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G (Chrome 101)
22.283 Points -58%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years)
136.2 runs/min +227%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro (Chrome 103)
42.4 runs/min +2%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G (Chome 106)
41.7 runs/min
Motorola Moto G42 (Chrome 103.0.5060.71)
37.8 runs/min -9%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (34.4 - 41.7, n=6)
37.4 runs/min -10%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G (Chome 92)
37.2 runs/min -11%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G (Chome 101)
16.73 runs/min -60%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)
148.7 Points +129%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
94 Points +45%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G (Chrome 106)
65 Points
Motorola Moto G42 (Chrome 103.0.5060.71)
59 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G (Chrome 92)
58 Points -11%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (50 - 65, n=4)
56.8 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G (Chrome 101)
39 Points -40%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years)
37161 Points +120%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro (Chrome 103)
22938 Points +36%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (15352 - 21843, n=9)
17130 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G (Chrome 106)
16871 Points
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G (Chrome 92)
16870 Points 0%
Honor X8 (Chrome 103)
13141 Points -22%
Motorola Moto G42 (Chrome 103.0.5060.71)
12364 Points -27%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G (Chrome 101)
5904 Points -65%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G (Chrome 101)
8326.9 ms * -268%
Motorola Moto G42 (Chrome 103.0.5060.71)
3341.4 ms * -48%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (2195 - 3387, n=8)
2693 ms * -19%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G (Chrome 92)
2543 ms * -13%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G (Chrome 106)
2259.8 ms *
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro (Chrome 103)
1982.32 ms * +12%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years)
1568 ms * +31%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=152, last 2 years)
113.8 Points +119%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro (Chrome 103)
65 Points +25%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (50 - 59, n=4)
54.3 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G (Chrome 106)
52 Points
Motorola Moto G42 (Chrome 103.0.5060.71)
43 Points -17%

* ... smaller is better

不幸的是,三星Galaxy A13 5G的用户将不得不面对漫长的复制操作和充电时间。该制造商的廉价手机使用缓慢的eMMC存储。

即使在其价格类别中,这也是过时的,所有竞争对手在存储芯片的数据传输过程中都明显更快。

Samsung Galaxy A13 5GSamsung Galaxy A22 5GSamsung Galaxy A13 4GXiaomi Poco X4 ProHonor X8Motorola Moto G42Average 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
9%
9%
98%
161%
121%
-25%
426%
Sequential Read 256KB
289.7
300.5
4%
308.5
6%
303.4
5%
926.58
220%
843.09
191%
Sequential Write 256KB
176.7
210.3
19%
236.8
34%
483.33
174%
510.25
189%
436.32
147%
176.2 ?(40 - 274, n=203)
0%
Random Read 4KB
86.2
118
37%
104.4
21%
193.45
124%
189.38
120%
122.08
42%
Random Write 4KB
90.9
69.2
-24%
67.3
-26%
173.03
90%
195.75
115%
186.23
105%

游戏--90赫兹的屏幕与浪费的潜力

在我们用GameBench的游戏FPS测试中软件,我们的测试设备几乎没有利用其90-Hz屏幕的优势。在Armajet中,我们还不得不手动切换回60赫兹,因为否则我们将被限制在最高30 FPS。

除了轻微的波动外,我们测试的游戏都很稳定,《PUBG Mobile》在低设置下达到40 FPS。虽然发烧级玩家不会对此感到高兴,但对于休闲游戏来说,这可能已经足够了。

氩氦刀
氩氦刀
PUBG手机版
PUBG手机版
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G; Armajet; 1.61.6: Ø58.7 (53-61)
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G; PUBG Mobile; Balanced; 2.2.0: Ø39.8 (38-41)
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G; PUBG Mobile; HD; 2.2.0: Ø29.2 (20-31)

排放--平庸的声音

温度

在长时间的负载下,智能手机在靠近手机顶部的一个非常局部的区域变得温暖。值得庆幸的是,室温下42.3°C(108.14°F)的峰值温度是不用担心的。

正如我们的3DMark结果所示,即使在极端压力下,由于临界温度而导致的节流也不太可能发生。

Max. Load
 39.7 °C32.1 °C29.9 °C 
 39.7 °C32.5 °C29.9 °C 
 38.3 °C32.4 °C30.3 °C 
Maximum: 39.7 °C
Average: 33.9 °C
28.8 °C32.9 °C41.8 °C
30 °C34.3 °C42.3 °C
30.3 °C34.5 °C41.5 °C
Maximum: 42.3 °C
Average: 35.2 °C
Power Supply (max.)  39.2 °C | Room Temperature 20.3 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.9 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.7 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.3 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.1 °C / 72 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.5 (7.24min) % 0%
Motorola Moto G42
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.4 (2.66min) % 0%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
99.3 (3.06min) % 0%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
99.2 (7.22min) %
Honor X8
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99.1 (2.66min) % 0%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
99 (1098min) % 0%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.1 (2.14min) % +1%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
98.8 (316min) % +1%
Honor X8
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
97.9 (0.745min) % 0%
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash
97.7 (1.939min) %
Motorola Moto G42
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
97.3 (0.725min) % 0%
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
97.2 (0.827min) % -1%
01234567Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø1.972 (1.939-1.986)
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø0.84 (0.827-0.851)
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø2.15 (2.14-2.16)
Honor X8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø0.753 (0.745-0.76)
Motorola Moto G42 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø0.733 (0.725-0.746)
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.25 (7.22-7.28)
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.07 (3.06-3.08)
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.25 (7.24-7.28)
Honor X8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø2.68 (2.66-2.68)
Motorola Moto G42 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.67 (2.66-2.68)
热力图前线
热力图前线
热力图
热力图

演讲者

小巧的单声道扬声器达到了一个体面的最大音量水平,尽管声音没什么可写的。由于薄和高音重的特点,它不适合长期的音乐或视频消费。

为了获得更清晰的效果,有一个3.5毫米音频插孔和蓝牙。

然而,在编解码器的支持方面,后者有些有限。除了三星的可扩展编解码器、SBC、LDAC和AAC之外,还支持较老的标准aptX,而其明显更好和更现代的变体却不支持。在这里,用户应该仔细选择他们的耳机或外部扬声器,以确保愉快的音频体验。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.237.32531.632.13128.229.84029.631.35034.239.46326.729.38019.422.510020.129.912513.827.516013.337.720010.442.925011.246.93159.550.7400956.55009.460.86309.360.480013.162.6100015.168.8125015.571.516009.673.820009.375.3250010.173.3315010.667400011.465.350001263.2630012.962.3800013.5691000014.170.41250014.965.91600015.556.4SPL24.482.1N0.547.8median 12median 62.6Delta2.49.336.738.635.736.427.329.933.333.537.434.225.225.818.221.820.523.413.535.417.343.213.547.813.550.213.155.812.959.713.36715.467.314.167.812.973.79.671.310.671.510.370.81168.412.670.415.265.616.866.716.466.416.566.116.663.315.960.516.655.226.381.10.749.7median 13.5median 66.12.47.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy A13 5GMotorola Moto G42
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 35% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 55% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Motorola Moto G42 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 离网2天

能源消耗

Galaxy A13 5G非常节能,特别是在空闲和要求不高的情况下。虽然负载下的耗电量也是可以接受的,但相对而言,它没有那么令人印象深刻。

这款手机的充电功率最高可达15瓦,这导致5000毫安时的大电池充电时间相当长。给一个空电池完全充电可能需要3个小时。给智能手机充电10分钟,电池电量的变化相对较小。在这里,三星最好关注一下竞争对手的情况。这款手机是 小米Poco X4 Pro可以以4倍或更高的功率充电。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1 / 1.1 / 1.2 Watt
Load midlight 3.4 / 5.6 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
5000 mAh
Honor X8
4000 mAh
Motorola Moto G42
5000 mAh
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-13%
-22%
-17%
-12%
-41%
-44%
Idle Minimum *
1
0.9
10%
0.9
10%
1.01
-1%
1
-0%
0.841 ?(0.61 - 1.28, n=8)
16%
Idle Average *
1.1
1.3
-18%
1.6
-45%
1.73
-57%
1.5
-36%
2.1 ?(1.1 - 4.52, n=8)
-91%
Idle Maximum *
1.2
1.7
-42%
2.1
-75%
1.79
-49%
2
-67%
2.26 ?(1.2 - 4.58, n=8)
-88%
Load Average *
3.4
3.8
-12%
3.6
-6%
3.05
10%
2.6
24%
4.39 ?(3.27 - 10.5, n=8)
-29%
Load Maximum *
5.6
5.8
-4%
5.3
5%
4.91
12%
4.5
20%
6.21 ?(5.3 - 11.2, n=8)
-11%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 nits)

012345Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G: Ø4.12 (2.48-5.66)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 nits)

00.20.30.50.70.911.21.41.51.71.92.12.22.42.62.82.93.13.3Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø2.79 (2.13-3.44)
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.107 (1.03-1.208)

电池寿命

当涉及到电池寿命测试时,我们的测试设备在许多情况下表现得非常好,在控制亮度水平下达到18:22小时的实际Wi-Fi运行时间。这足以满足2天的正常使用,甚至更多的中度使用,而无需给手机充电。

令人惊讶的是,尽管显示分辨率较低,但与这个价位的其他手机相比,在苛刻场景下的运行时间更短。5:34小时,负载运行时间仍然很好,游戏者不必经常靠近电源插座。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
46h 39min
WiFi Websurfing
18h 22min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
20h 29min
Load (maximum brightness)
5h 34min
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A13 4G
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
5000 mAh
Honor X8
4000 mAh
Motorola Moto G42
5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
2%
-7%
-16%
-22%
-4%
Reader / Idle
2799
2853
2%
2164
-23%
1575
-44%
2223
-21%
H.264
1229
1307
6%
1054
-14%
1033
-16%
1185
-4%
WiFi v1.3
1102
1156
5%
864
-22%
739
-33%
858
-22%
949
-14%
Load
334
316
-5%
437
31%
432
29%
406
22%

Pros

+ 支持5G
+ 灵敏的指纹传感器
+ 良好的电池寿命
+ 没有PWM

Cons

- 低分辨率的屏幕
- 存储速度慢
- 没有广角镜头
- 基本的外壳
- 地理定位有零星的准确性问题
- 充电时间长
- 平庸的扬声器

判决--需要改进

在审查中。三星Galaxy A13 5G。
在审查中。三星Galaxy A13 5G。

三星Galaxy A13 5G是一款相当简单的智能手机,亮点很少。它们包括长的电池寿命和快速的指纹传感器。

只要你对反应速度、扬声器质量和地理定位准确性的标准不是太高,这款手机就很适合正常的任务。

对于未来的机型,我们希望最终能看到更快的充电速度,具有更高的最大亮度的高分辨率屏幕,以及改变迟缓的eMMC存储,它已经变得非常过时。

通过Galaxy A13 5G,三星创造了一个支持现代蜂窝通信标准的智能手机,适合有节制的用户。然而,在某些方面,它已经过时了。

在250美元左右的智能手机领域,有强大的竞争对手,如 小米Poco X4 Pro,它有一个更有吸引力的外壳,更快的性能,更快的充电,以及更高分辨率的屏幕。

不需要5G的用户可以选择A13 4G手机,以节省大量资金。 Galaxy A13 4G来代替。在写这篇文章时,它在Amazon.com的售价约为180美元。而且与它的5G兄弟姐妹非常相似,但有一个更高分辨率的显示屏,一个广角摄像头,而且性能较差。

价格和可用性

在撰写本文时,三星Galaxy A13 5G正在销售黑色或绿色的64GB存储空间,价格约为195美元(正常情况下约为250美元)。

这两个型号在Amazon.com上也有售。售价约为250美元。

Samsung Galaxy A13 5G - 10/12/2022 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
78%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
89%
Connectivity
48 / 70 → 68%
Weight
88%
Battery
92%
Display
83%
Games Performance
26 / 64 → 41%
Application Performance
65 / 86 → 76%
Temperature
92%
Noise
100%
Audio
60 / 90 → 67%
Camera
52%
Average
72%
78%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 三星Galaxy A13 5G智能手机评测--现代蜂窝技术在一个简单的包装中的应用
Florian Schmitt, 2022-10-12 (Update: 2024-08-15)