Notebookcheck Logo

小米Poco X4 Pro 5G智能手机评论。5G手机配备108MP和120Hz OLED，价格低廉

在廉价的中档产品中，超过1,100尼特。

Poco X4 Pro 5G有很多硬件亮点，建议零售价约为300美元。在支持5G的基础上，Poco X3 Pro的继任者得到了各种改进，包括一个非常明亮的AMOLED显示屏，120赫兹。然而，X4 Pro并没有让一切变得更好 ...
5G Smartphone Touchscreen
测试小米Poco X4 Pro 5G智能手机

对许多用户来说，Poco X4 Pro最重要的创新之一很可能是在Poco X Pro阵容中引入了5G标准。然而，这种连接性的改善是以降低性能为代价的，因为骁龙860中的 波克X3 Pro在名义上强于 骁龙695现在装备在继任者身上。

Poco X4 Pro的显示屏 Poco X4 Pro 5G是一个很大的进步，这里没有做出任何妥协。小米的中端智能手机不再依靠LCD面板，而是依靠AMOLED技术，峰值超过1000尼特。刷新率仍为120赫兹。

Poco X4 Pro 5G的建议零售价约为315美元。

Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro (Poco X5 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 8 x 1.7 - 2.2 GHz, Kryo 660 Gold (2x Cortex-A78) / Silver (6x Cortex-A55)
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 619
Memory
6 GB 
Display
6.67 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 395 PPI, Capacitive Touchscreen, AMOLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 128 GB 
, 102 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5 mm jack, Card Reader: microSD up to 1TB, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, OTG, Miracast, IR Blaster
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.1, 5G: Sub6G: n1,3,5,7,8,20,28,38,40,41,77,78, 4G: FDD-LTE-Band 1,2,3,4,5,7,8,12,17,18,19,20,26,28, TDD-LTE-Band 38, 40, 41, 3G: 1,2,4,5,8,6,19, 2G: 850 900 1800 1900 MHz, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.12 x 164.19 x 76.1
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 108 MPix (f/1.9, 26mm, 1/1.52", 0.7µm) + 64MP (f/1.8, 26mm, 0.7µm) + 8MP (f/2.2, 1/4", 1.12µm) + 2MP (f/2.4)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix )f/2.5, 1/3.06" 1.0µm)
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Virtual, Charger, USB cable, MIUI 13, 12 Months Warranty, widevine L1, SAR value: 0.596W/​kg Head, 0.956W/​kg Body, fanless
Weight
205 g, Power Supply: 131 g
Price
240 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
82.5 %
v7 (old)
07 / 2022
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
SD 695 5G, Adreno 619		205 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"2400x1080
81 %
v7 (old)
07 / 2022
Motorola Moto G52
SD 680, Adreno 610		169 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.60"2400x1080
80 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2022
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
SD 680, Adreno 610		179 g64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.43"2400x1080
80.5 %
v7 (old)
01 / 2022
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2		195 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.60"2400x1080
81.1 %
v7 (old)
06 / 2022
Samsung Galaxy M23
SD 750G 5G, Adreno 619		198 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.60"2408x1080
80.2 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2022
Realme 9 5G
SD 695 5G, Adreno 619		191 g64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.60"2412x1080

保护壳 - 小米智能手机，带冲孔

Poco X4 Pro的颜色
Poco X4 Pro的颜色

尽管Poco X4 Pro 5G相对较重，为205克，但它比其 前代产品.但X4系列的专业机型也不是真的紧凑。玻璃背面装饰着 "激光条纹"，像小聚光灯的灯光一样遍布外壳。这款中档智能手机有三种不同的颜色。激光黑、激光蓝 和Poco黄。Poco X4 Pro拥有IP 53认证，这意味着它具有正式的防尘和防水功能。

对于一部300美元左右的智能手机来说，其制造质量和感觉都处于高水平。当然，塑料框架使Poco X4 Pro失去了一些高端手机的价值，但它并不感觉廉价。然而，背面包裹着摄像头的平板玻璃，拿在手里感觉有点笨重。

与前代产品相比，制造商削减了康宁大猩猩6号玻璃；Poco X4 Pro只使用了5号玻璃。6.67英寸显示屏顶部和底部的边缘大小适中，这反映在86%的固体显示表面比率上。

在审查中。小米Poco X4 Pro 5G智能手机
在审查中。小米Poco X4 Pro 5G智能手机
在审查中。小米Poco X4 Pro 5G智能手机
在审查中。小米Poco X4 Pro 5G智能手机
在审查中。小米Poco X4 Pro 5G智能手机
在审查中。小米Poco X4 Pro 5G智能手机
在审查中。小米Poco X4 Pro 5G智能手机

尺寸比较

❌
165.5 mm 77 mm 8.4 mm 198 g164.3 mm 75.6 mm 8.5 mm 191 g164.19 mm 76.1 mm 8.12 mm 205 g163.56 mm 75.78 mm 8.75 mm 195 g160.1 mm 74.5 mm 8 mm 169 g159.87 mm 73.87 mm 8.09 mm 179 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

设备 - 带有3.5毫米插孔的Poco X4 Pro 5G

Poco X4 Pro 5G对于一款廉价的中端智能手机来说，在设备方面没有任何真正的批评点，提供了这个价格范围内人们可以合理期望的所有功能。这些功能包括立体声扬声器、红外辐射器、3.5毫米耳机插孔、蓝牙5.1、用于非接触式支付的NFC芯片、双SIM卡和永远在线功能。

除了配备128GB UFS存储和6GB内存的版本外，还有256GB和8GB内存的选择（建议零售价：315美元）。内部存储可以通过microSD卡扩展到1TB。虽然外部外设和存储设备可以连接到Poco智能手机上，但USB-C端口只能按照2.0标准工作。因此，有线图像输出是不可能的，但支持Miracast。

箱子的左面
箱子的左面
箱子的右侧（按钮）
箱子的右侧（按钮）
外壳顶部（3.5毫米插孔、扬声器、麦克风、红外辐射器）。
外壳顶部（3.5毫米插孔、扬声器、麦克风、红外辐射器）。
机箱底部（卡槽、USB接口、麦克风、扬声器）。
机箱底部（卡槽、USB接口、麦克风、扬声器）。

微型SD卡读卡器

小米手机有一个混合卡槽，这意味着可以插入两张nano-SIM卡或一张microSD卡。在复制速度方面，Poco X4的速度并不快，只有12MB/s；一个 三星Galaxy M23复制图像的速度要快三倍以上。另一方面，在跨平台磁盘测试中，microSD的性能（与AV PRO V60参考卡结合使用）令人信服。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy M23
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Angelbird V60)
36.6 MB/s +209%
Realme 9 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)
26.3 MB/s +122%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
24.74 MB/s +109%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Angelbird V60)
20.56 MB/s +74%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
15.47 MB/s +31%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
11.84 MB/s

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø34.4 (23.3-43)
Realme 9 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø37.1 (26.6-49.6)
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø76.2 (32.4-83)
Realme 9 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø74.6 (34.7-88)

软件 - Poco X4 Pro withAndroid 11

小米将Android 系统与内部用户界面MIUI结合在一起，用于Poco的13版。然而，在审查时，Poco手机只基于Android 11，考虑到300美元左右的零售价，这是比较好的。从2022年7月开始的安全补丁是非常及时的

Poco X4 Pro当然应该升级到Android 12，但制造商没有提供这方面的任何官方信息。小米12系列的更新保证，即三个主要的Android 更新和四年的安全更新，并不适用于Poco系列。超过3年，包括2次重大升级，不应该被期待。

通过Poco的MIUI 13，X4 Pro使用了重新设计的MiSans字体，各种新的小工具，以及对谷歌 "Material You "设计的支持。在MiUI 13界面内，我们无法看清任何广告横幅或广告，例如在安装应用程序时。一般来说，这些所谓的MSA（MIUI系统广告）可以很容易地在系统设置中的 "密码和安全 "下禁用。

在审查中。小米Poco X4 Pro 5G智能手机
在审查中。小米Poco X4 Pro 5G智能手机
在审查中。小米Poco X4 Pro 5G智能手机
在审查中。小米Poco X4 Pro 5G智能手机

通信与GNSS - 带有NFC的小米智能手机

对于家庭无线局域网，Poco X4 Pro提供了带有WiFi 5的ac标准，包括2.4和5GHz频率范围，在我们的测量中确保了坚实的传输速率。速率与低价的中档竞争产品相当，但322-349 mbit/s并不是真正的快。结合我们的华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000参考路由器，Poco X4 Pro在发送数据时证明是稳定的，但在测试中接收的初始阶段表现不佳。

除了快速的5G标准外，小米的这款中端智能手机还支持接入总共17个LTE频段--涵盖了德语区所有相关的LTE频率，包括28频段。Poco手机也为旅行提供了良好的装备，例如在美国。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone
  (34.8 - 1875, n=185, last 2 years)
712 MBit/s +121%
Realme 9 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
341 (330min - 352max) MBit/s +6%
Samsung Galaxy M23
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
340 (323min - 348max) MBit/s +6%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
322 (124min - 352max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
298 (198min - 345max) MBit/s -7%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
283 (244min - 311max) MBit/s -12%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone
  (40.5 - 1810, n=187, last 2 years)
726 MBit/s +108%
Samsung Galaxy M23
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
363 (341min - 377max) MBit/s +4%
Realme 9 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
362 (329min - 376max) MBit/s +4%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
349 (317min - 362max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
322 (162min - 386max) MBit/s -8%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
292 MBit/s -16%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360Tooltip
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø321 (124-352)
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø349 (317-362)
在室内定位
在室内定位
在户外进行本地化
在户外进行本地化

Poco X4 Pro使用主要卫星系统GPS（L1）、GLONASS（G1）、BeiDou（B1）和Galileo（E1）以及SBAS进行定位。为了在实践中评估跟踪的准确性，我们带着这款中档手机进行了一次短途旅行，并与Garmin Venu 2一起记录了路线，以便进行比较。

在大多数情况下，我们喜欢Poco X4 Pro的追踪能力。然而，在详细检查GPS历史记录时，有时可以清楚地看到与所选路线的偏差。尽管有一些小的不准确之处，小米手机还是适用于导航任务，但在室内进行卫星定位需要很长的时间，而且信号强度也不是很明显，信噪比值为23。

Poco X4 Pro vs. Garmin Venu 2
Poco X4 Pro vs. Garmin Venu 2

电话和语音质量--双卡双待的Poco手机

在审查中。小米Poco X4 Pro 5G智能手机
在审查中。小米Poco X4 Pro 5G智能手机

语音质量很好，没有异常情况。声音被清晰地再现，在接收端也传达得非常清楚。也支持VoLTE或Wi-Fi通话等标准。由于麦克风功能良好，Poco X4 Pro在视频通话方面也令人印象深刻--通过Skype测试--以及扬声器。

相机 - Poco X4 Pro 5G，108MP

Poco X4 Pro的人像模式
Poco X4 Pro的人像模式
与Poco X4 Pro的自拍
与Poco X4 Pro的自拍

用户不应该对Poco X4 Pro的自拍相机抱有很高的期望，但照片质量是扎实的。在困难的照明条件下，1600万像素的照片往往曝光过度，特别是在人像模式下，天空看起来被烧掉了。此外，柔焦现象相当明显。

从纸面上看，Poco对后置主摄像头进行了重大改进，现在有1.08亿像素，光圈为f/1.9。就这个价格范围而言，通常没有光学防抖功能，所以图像在黑暗中变得模糊和失焦相对较快。光照度也不是很好。但就这个价格而言，在明亮环境中实现的照片质量是很吸引人的。图像清晰度和对比度在日光下是令人信服的。

1.08亿像素的摄像头伴随着一个具有800万像素的118度超广角摄像头和一个200万像素的微距镜头。超广角摄像头具有扎实的照片质量，但提供的细节很少，清晰度低。

尽管Poco X4 Pro的主摄像头具有很高的分辨率，但视频只能以30帧/秒的速度记录，而更高的帧率或UHD选项是不存在的。在视频录制过程中，在主镜头和超广角镜头之间进行切换也是不可能的。X3 Pro众所周知的视频模式，如双视频，仍然在船上。

超广角
广角
2倍变焦
10倍变焦（最大）
108MP模式
在审查中。小米Poco X4 Pro 5G智能手机
在审查中。小米Poco X4 Pro 5G智能手机
在审查中。小米Poco X4 Pro 5G智能手机
在审查中。小米Poco X4 Pro 5G智能手机

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Wide angleWide angleLow LightUltra wide angleZoom 5x
orginal image
click to load images

我们还发现，Poco X4 Pro的照片的色彩保真度非常吸引人。在受控的照明条件下，我们分析了108MP光学器件的色彩表现与实际参考色彩的对比。在完整的演播室照明下和在1勒克斯的光照强度下各测量一次颜色。在我们的ColorChecker Passport测试中，小米手机只显示几个轻微的离群值（Delta E值>10）。

ColorChecker
14.1 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
9 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
6 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
9 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro: 7.9 ∆E min: 3.07 - max: 14.3 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.4 ∆E
54.8 ∆E
39.9 ∆E
36.3 ∆E
44.9 ∆E
65.5 ∆E
54.2 ∆E
35.6 ∆E
43.4 ∆E
28 ∆E
66.2 ∆E
64.7 ∆E
31.3 ∆E
48.6 ∆E
37.2 ∆E
77.9 ∆E
43.6 ∆E
44.1 ∆E
93.7 ∆E
71.4 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
37 ∆E
24.6 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro: 47.45 ∆E min: 14.22 - max: 93.74 ∆E

配件及保修 - 小米手机带电源适配器

带有67瓦电源适配器的Poco X4 Pro
带有67瓦电源适配器的Poco X4 Pro

Poco X4 Pro配备了一个67瓦的模块化电源，一条数据或充电线，一个保护罩，一个SIM卡针和一个包含保修条款和条件的快速启动指南。屏幕保护膜在出厂时就已应用。

在德国提供两年的保修。这在你购买的国家可能有所不同，所以在购买前一定要向你的供应商查询。

输入设备和操作 - 带有FaceUnlock的小米智能手机

集成在电源按钮上的指纹传感器能可靠地解锁Poco X4 Pro 5G，但不是很迅速。通过前置摄像头的FaceUnlock功能，通过一个相当不安全的2D面部识别解决方案进行，在日常使用中也能可靠地工作。

6.67英寸OLED显示屏上的输入被准确地实现，直到触摸屏的角落。由于360赫兹的采样率，Poco X4 Pro的面板每秒被扫描多达360次，例如在游戏中，这确保了触摸时的低延迟。由于120赫兹的高刷新率，图像的变化或网页的滚动都能流畅地显示。

在审查中。小米Poco X4 Pro 5G智能手机
在审查中。小米Poco X4 Pro 5G智能手机
在审查中。小米Poco X4 Pro 5G智能手机

显示屏 - 小米智能手机采用OLED

子像素网格
子像素网格

Poco X4 Pro有一个6.67英寸的AMOLED屏幕，分辨率为2400x1080，支持最大刷新率为120赫兹。想节省一些能源的人也可以将屏幕刷新率设置为60赫兹。自适应刷新率的改变是不可能的。

在我们的亮度测量中，OLED面板的表现非常好。在全白显示的情况下，小米这款廉价的中端手机最高达到了713cd/m²，对于这个价格范围来说是非常好的。在更能代表日常使用的APL18测量中，这在屏幕中心甚至达到了1106 cd/m²。因此，该显示屏很适合渲染HDR内容，尽管Poco没有正式宣传这一点。

由于采用了OLED面板，Poco X4 Pro的闪烁是无法避免的。低于68%的显示亮度，PWM频率在159至479赫兹之间波动。到最大亮度时，振幅曲线更加平缓，在120赫兹时变得更加稳定。

681
cd/m²		684
cd/m²		706
cd/m²
688
cd/m²		687
cd/m²		712
cd/m²
688
cd/m²		687
cd/m²		713
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 713 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 694 cd/m² Minimum: 2.61 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 687 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
89.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.16
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"		Motorola Moto G52
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.6"		Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.4"		Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
TFT-LCD, 2400x1080, 6.6"		Samsung Galaxy M23
IPS, 2408x1080, 6.6"		Realme 9 5G
IPS, 2412x1080, 6.6"		Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Screen
-7%
4%
-99%
-135%
-150%
-9%
Brightness middle
687
655
-5%
702
2%
504
-27%
551
-20%
589
-14%
567
-17%
Brightness
694
649
-6%
701
1%
499
-28%
525
-24%
561
-19%
524
-24%
Brightness Distribution
96
95
-1%
98
2%
91
-5%
87
-9%
90
-6%
87
-9%
Black Level *
0.72
0.4
0.5
0.57
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.2
1.1
8%
1
17%
3.3
-175%
4.57
-281%
4.33
-261%
1
17%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4
2.58
35%
2.3
42%
6
-50%
6.56
-64%
8.39
-110%
2.1
47%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1
1.7
-70%
1.4
-40%
4.1
-310%
5.1
-410%
5.9
-490%
1.7
-70%
Gamma
2.16 102%
2.212 99%
2.2 100%
2.28 96%
2.31 95%
2.063 107%
2.16 102%
CCT
6496 100%
6557 99%
6520 100%
7041 92%
7750 84%
8021 81%
6343 102%
Contrast
700
1378
1178
995

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 479.1 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 479.1 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 479.1 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最小屏幕亮度
分钟。
25%的屏幕亮度
25%
50%的屏幕亮度
50%
75%的屏幕亮度
75%
最大的手动屏幕亮度
100%

镜头下的画面是固定的放大镜和不一样的智能显示。

我们使用CalMAN分析软件检查了AMOLED面板的色彩校准。在出厂设置下（配置文件：标准），sRGB色彩空间几乎被完全覆盖。根据制造商的说法，更大的DCI-P3色彩空间也被支持。

我们测量的DeltaE值表明颜色有一些非常小的偏差。在蓝色和品红色中可以看到最小的差异。在目标范围内的更小的偏差（<3）出现在灰度再现中。

颜色的准确性
颜色的准确性
色彩空间
色彩空间
灰度
灰度
色彩饱和度
色彩饱和度

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
1.25 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.636 ms rise
↘ 0.616 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.5805 ms rise
↘ 0.6185 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33 ms).

Poco手机为户外使用提供了良好的装备。由于其高亮度，明亮的环境光线不会造成任何问题。只有高反射率的表面阻碍了阳光下的良好可读性。

AMOLED显示屏的可视角度稳定性非常好。在平坦的视角下，可以看到典型的亮度下降，但没有观察到颜色失真。

性能 - 配备骁龙系统芯片的Poco X4 Pro 5G

A 高通骁龙695 被用于Poco X4 Pro。该芯片组于2021年底推出，提供两个快速的Cortex A78内核和6个基于ARM Cortex A55的省电内核。除了CPU核心外，骁龙695还集成了一个 Adreno 619作为图形单元。

在基准测试中，与中端竞争者相比，小米手机将自己定位在前面。与 realme 9 5G一起，后者也使用了 骁龙695Poco X4 Pro表现良好，特别是在单核性能方面。然而，前者 前辈采用的是 骁龙8604G芯片组在名义上要强大得多，特别是凭借四个Cortex A76核心在多核范围内。

Geekbench 5.5 | Antutu v9 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | AImark
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=173, last 2 years)
989 Points +43%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
728 Points +5%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
694 Points
Realme 9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
692 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (659 - 697, n=24)
676 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy M23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
643 Points -7%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
598 Points -14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
384 Points -45%
Motorola Moto G52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
378 Points -46%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6687, n=173, last 2 years)
3298 Points +62%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
2657 Points +30%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2038 Points
Realme 9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1914 Points -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (1663 - 2038, n=24)
1904 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy M23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1846 Points -9%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1809 Points -11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1738 Points -15%
Motorola Moto G52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1573 Points -23%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (99654 - 1650926, n=107, last 2 years)
797430 Points +108%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
563850 Points +47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (344344 - 416086, n=18)
389461 Points +1%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
383847 Points
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
353908 Points -8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
252044 Points -34%
Motorola Moto G52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
207780 Points -46%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 24088, n=190, last 2 years)
12948 Points +22%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
11153 Points +6%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
10571 Points
Samsung Galaxy M23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
9800 Points -7%
Realme 9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
9776 Points -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (6897 - 11732, n=23)
9629 Points -9%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
9402 Points -11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
7694 Points -27%
Motorola Moto G52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
6728 Points -36%
CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 1517, n=157, last 2 years)
880 Points +46%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
604 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (521 - 606, n=18)
583 Points -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
388 Points -36%
Motorola Moto G52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
327 Points -46%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 11976, n=152, last 2 years)
6257 Points +65%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
5224 Points +38%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3794 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (3171 - 3848, n=19)
3648 Points -4%
Realme 9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3535 Points -7%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
3268 Points -14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
2738 Points -28%
Motorola Moto G52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
2573 Points -32%
System
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 16475, n=152, last 2 years)
10131 Points +31%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
8549 Points +11%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
7736 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (6789 - 8231, n=19)
7725 Points 0%
Realme 9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
6969 Points -10%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
6361 Points -18%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
5794 Points -25%
Motorola Moto G52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
5739 Points -26%
Memory
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 12716, n=152, last 2 years)
6714 Points +46%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
5716 Points +24%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4593 Points
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
4589 Points 0%
Realme 9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
4366 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (3167 - 4836, n=19)
4227 Points -8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
3824 Points -17%
Motorola Moto G52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
3483 Points -24%
Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=152, last 2 years)
16761 Points +281%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
10549 Points +140%
Realme 9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
4413 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4401 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (3975 - 4426, n=19)
4340 Points -1%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2929 Points -33%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
2183 Points -50%
Motorola Moto G52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
2182 Points -50%
Web
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2145, n=152, last 2 years)
1557 Points +21%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
1445 Points +13%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1334 Points +4%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1283 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (1078 - 1434, n=19)
1253 Points -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1199 Points -7%
Realme 9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1163 Points -9%
Motorola Moto G52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
917 Points -29%
AImark - Score v2.x
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
46152 Points +690%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
9008 Points +54%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
5839 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (4924 - 5839, n=10)
5173 Points -11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
4995 Points -14%
Motorola Moto G52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
4859 Points -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1043 - 7865, n=2, last 2 years)
4454 Points -24%

虽然 阿德雷诺619虽然Adreno 619不能提供快速的图形处理，但Poco X4 Pro仍然取得了非常体面的分数，并与realme 9.然而，一个 Poco X3 Pro有着 Adreno 640有时会达到几乎高出3倍的结果。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
974 Points +163%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
371 Points
Realme 9 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
352 Points -5%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
348 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy M23
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
189 Points -49%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
124 Points -67%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
122 Points -67%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
987 Points +173%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
362 Points
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
360 Points -1%
Realme 9 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
356 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy M23
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
193 Points -47%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
127 Points -65%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
115 Points -68%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3455 Points +182%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1227 Points
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1210 Points -1%
Realme 9 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1197 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy M23
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
635 Points -48%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
463 Points -62%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
435 Points -65%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3488 Points +170%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1292 Points
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1235 Points -4%
Realme 9 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1197 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy M23
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
644 Points -50%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
457 Points -65%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
447 Points -65%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3017 Points +10%
Realme 9 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2883 Points +5%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2882 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy M23
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2857 Points +4%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2736 Points
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2511 Points -8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2375 Points -13%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6987 Points +156%
Realme 9 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2749 Points +1%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2731 Points
Samsung Galaxy M23
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2496 Points -9%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2396 Points -12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1155 Points -58%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1153 Points -58%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5406 Points +97%
Realme 9 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2778 Points +1%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2738 Points
Samsung Galaxy M23
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2568 Points -6%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2489 Points -9%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1299 Points -53%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1253 Points -54%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4367 Points +24%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3804 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy M23
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3595 Points +2%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3512 Points
Realme 9 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3462 Points -1%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2674 Points -24%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2573 Points -27%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8218 Points +174%
Realme 9 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3008 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2998 Points
Samsung Galaxy M23
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2760 Points -8%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2570 Points -14%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1242 Points -59%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1199 Points -60%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6871 Points +122%
Realme 9 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3098 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3092 Points
Samsung Galaxy M23
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2910 Points -6%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2770 Points -10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1372 Points -56%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1367 Points -56%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3647 Points
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3553 Points -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2654 Points -27%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2644 Points -28%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4384 Points
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3846 Points -12%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2067 Points -53%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1995 Points -54%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4129 Points
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3777 Points -9%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2145 Points -48%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2113 Points -49%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2983 Points
Realme 9 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2949 Points -1%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2714 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy M23
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1757 Points -41%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1365 Points -54%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1357 Points -55%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2836 Points
Realme 9 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2831 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2546 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy M23
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1593 Points -44%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1188 Points -58%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1154 Points -59%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3529 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3527 Points
Realme 9 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3455 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy M23
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2749 Points -22%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2738 Points -22%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2683 Points -24%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7752 Points +84%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4221 Points
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3965 Points -6%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2190 Points -48%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2085 Points -51%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
12070 Points +174%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4399 Points
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4014 Points -9%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2096 Points -52%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1931 Points -56%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3801 Points +7%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3562 Points
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3442 Points -3%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2696 Points -24%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2589 Points -27%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps +45%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
82 fps
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
56 fps -32%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
37 fps -55%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
36 fps -56%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
184 fps +96%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
94 fps
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
66 fps -30%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
42 fps -55%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
41 fps -56%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
103 fps +145%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
42 fps
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
36 fps -14%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
20 fps -52%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps -60%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
110 fps +134%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
47 fps
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
40 fps -15%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
22 fps -53%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps -57%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
74 fps +147%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
30 fps
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
23 fps -23%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps -57%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
13 fps -57%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
77 fps +120%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
35 fps
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
26 fps -26%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps -54%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
15 fps -57%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 fps +159%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps -24%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
7.4 fps -56%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7.3 fps -57%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
46 fps +130%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps -20%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
8.8 fps -56%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.6 fps -57%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
29 fps +142%
Realme 9 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
12 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
12 fps
Samsung Galaxy M23
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
11 fps -8%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
9.3 fps -22%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5.3 fps -56%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5 fps -58%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
17 fps +110%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.1 fps
Realme 9 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7.8 fps -4%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6.2 fps -23%
Samsung Galaxy M23
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3.3 fps -59%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3.2 fps -60%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1.4 fps -83%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
45 fps +137%
Realme 9 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps -21%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
9.5 fps -50%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.8 fps -54%
Samsung Galaxy M23
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
7.1 fps -63%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
46 fps +119%
Realme 9 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
21 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
21 fps
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps -19%
Samsung Galaxy M23
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
17 fps -19%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
9.8 fps -53%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5.1 fps -76%

Poco手机在浏览器基准方面的表现非常好，在日常冲浪中表现得不显眼。

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=162, last 2 years)
119.3 Points +85%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (48.6 - 105.3, n=19)
71.2 Points +10%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro (Chrome 103)
64.534 Points
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G (Chrome 96)
43.83 Points -32%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 (Chrome 101)
43.525 Points -33%
Motorola Moto G52 (Chrome 103)
40.743 Points -37%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=148, last 2 years)
133.6 runs/min +215%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (38.7 - 80.1, n=16)
54 runs/min +27%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro (Chrome 103)
42.4 runs/min
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G (Chrome 96)
39.8 runs/min -6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 (Chrome 101)
39.64 runs/min -7%
Motorola Moto G52 (Chrome 103)
37.48 runs/min -12%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=82, last 2 years)
147.1 Points +56%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (75 - 156, n=12)
101 Points +7%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
94 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 (Chrome 101)
67 Points -29%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G (Chrome 96)
62 Points -34%
Motorola Moto G52 (Chrome 103)
60 Points -36%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years)
36802 Points +60%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (17849 - 31647, n=21)
24051 Points +5%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro (Chrome 103)
22938 Points
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G (Chrome 96)
19010 Points -17%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 (Chrome 101)
13056 Points -43%
Motorola Moto G52 (Chrome 103)
12386 Points -46%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 (Chrome 101)
3234.1 ms * -63%
Motorola Moto G52 (Chrome 103)
3183.3 ms * -61%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G (Chrome 96)
2410 ms * -22%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro (Chrome 103)
1982.32 ms *
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (1298 - 2501, n=18)
1769 ms * +11%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=161, last 2 years)
1583 ms * +20%

* ... smaller is better

Poco X4 Pro的128GB UFS存储仅提供适度的读写速率。该速度低于该价格区间的平均水平，但这也是由于骁龙695处理器的低内存带宽造成的。 骁龙695- 类似于 摩托G82.

Xiaomi Poco X4 ProMotorola Moto G52Xiaomi Redmi Note 11Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5GSamsung Galaxy M23Realme 9 5GAverage 128 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
39%
46%
48%
49%
-27%
39%
206%
Sequential Read 256KB
303.4
893.44
194%
895.34
195%
964
218%
867.2
186%
511
68%
728 ?(303 - 1038, n=71)
140%
1838 ?(226 - 4512, n=192, last 2 years)
506%
Sequential Write 256KB
483.33
503.56
4%
519.23
7%
471
-3%
500.3
4%
120.6
-75%
527 ?(103.2 - 903, n=71)
9%
1430 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=192, last 2 years)
196%
Random Read 4KB
193.45
98.99
-49%
172.95
-11%
148.8
-23%
187.9
-3%
88.5
-54%
191.7 ?(89.3 - 297, n=71)
-1%
278 ?(22.2 - 543, n=192, last 2 years)
44%
Random Write 4KB
173.03
182.92
6%
163.29
-6%
171.8
-1%
189.5
10%
95.4
-45%
185.8 ?(62.6 - 419, n=71)
7%
310 ?(9.4 - 753, n=192, last 2 years)
79%

游戏--Poco X4 Pro 5G，120 fps

我们用我们的合作伙伴GameBench的工具对Poco X4 Pro的游戏能力进行了测试，。尽管小米手机有一个刷新率为120赫兹的OLED面板，但是 骁龙695只能对这些功能进行有限的利用。

PUBG手机基本上可以顺利运行，但在高清设置下只能达到40帧。我们没有UHD选项进行测试，但Poco X4 Pro在低细节下实现了稳定的60帧。Armajet中的FPS率也出乎意料地好。Poco手机有时能达到100帧以上，这要比摩托G82的60帧。

在审查中。小米Poco X4 Pro 5G智能手机
在审查中。小米Poco X4 Pro 5G智能手机
0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro; Armajet: Ø90.1 (58-120)
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø39.8 (37-41)
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro; PUBG Mobile; Balanced: Ø39.9 (38-41)
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø29.9 (29-31)

排放--Poco手机保持冷静

温度

Poco X4 Pro的GFX基准测试有问题
Poco X4 Pro的GFX基准测试有问题

机箱的表面温度在空闲时和负载时都没有问题。最高温度为35℃，从SoC的性能稳定性来看，测得的废热并不是太关键。我们用GFX基准的压力测试来评估这一点，它连续30次重复各自的OpenGL ES 3.1场景并记录帧率。之后，小米智能手机在3DMark压力测试中通过了它的考验。

在日常使用中，小米手机不会出现高负荷下刷新率下降的情况。Poco X4 Pro的性能在两个3DMark测试场景中的节流程度都很小。GFX基准的压力测试完成后没有任何问题，但无法检索到结果。

Max. Load
 34.6 °C34 °C30.8 °C 
 35.1 °C31.9 °C31.1 °C 
 32.5 °C34 °C30.4 °C 
Maximum: 35.1 °C
Average: 32.7 °C
30.3 °C31.2 °C32.1 °C
30.4 °C31 °C32.8 °C
30.6 °C32.1 °C32.6 °C
Maximum: 32.8 °C
Average: 31.5 °C
Power Supply (max.)  29.6 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.7 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.1 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.8 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.6 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99.7 % 0%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.6 % 0%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.5 %
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.1 % 0%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.1 %
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99 % 0%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
% -100%
01234567Tooltip
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø2.15 (2.14-2.16)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.5.1: Ø2.16 (2.15-2.17)
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.25 (7.24-7.28)
Motorola Moto G52 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.68 (2.68-2.68)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.68 (2.66-2.69)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø7.38 (7.36-7.39)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø7.25 (7.25-7.25)
在审查中。小米Poco X4 Pro 5G智能手机
在审查中。小米Poco X4 Pro 5G智能手机

发言人

Poco X4 Pro的双扬声器系统足够响亮，由于立体声的存在，其音质在这个价格范围内很有吸引力。这两个扬声器缺乏深度，但中音被线性地再现出来。超高音调只是略微存在，与高低音相似。

耳机可以通过3.5毫米插孔连接。那些喜欢使用蓝牙进行无线输出的人可以使用从SBC、AAC、aptX、aptXHD到aptX自适应以及LDAC和LHDC等音频编解码器。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2042.642.32529313127.8284025.828.95032.534.86322.4238024.524.610019.428.812516.542.216018.449.620012.848.72509.952.631511.355.640013.156.450011.466.36301169.580011.671.3100012.376.412501275.4160012.474.3200012.275.125001376.3315012.875.9400013.277.3500013.478.8630013.876.3800013.371.31000013.363.11250013.564.51600013.158.8SPL24.987.2N0.669.3median 13median 69.5Delta0.89.939.239.433.932.22728.932.432.33632.330.92619.42219.922.715.524.815.937.112.342.212.947.912.952.99.957.410.262.213.463.91773.614.278.912.878.711.782.410.281.311.6771379.81574.41661.914.656.615.269.715.97116.360.316.659.826.289.30.769.4median 14.2median 63.91.911.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Poco X4 ProSamsung Galaxy M23
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy M23 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 10.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (12.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 67% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 81% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 小米智能手机的快速充电功能

消耗功率

Poco X4 Pro的电池在这个价格范围内是典型的大电池，为5000毫安时，充电速度相对较快，最高可达67瓦特。幸运的是，交货范围内包括一个相应的电源适配器。通过小米专有的涡轮充电技术，充电过程大约需要40分钟。

负载下的功耗水平并不明显，但空闲模式下的1.7瓦是相当多的。总的来说，该比率对于一个 骁龙695-配备的智能手机的平均水平。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.05 / 0.27 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.01 / 1.73 / 1.79 Watt
Load midlight 3.05 / 4.91 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
5000 mAh		Motorola Moto G52
5000 mAh		Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
5000 mAh		Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
5000 mAh		Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
15%
0%
-3%
-7%
-34%
Idle Minimum *
1.01
0.8
21%
1.06
-5%
0.51
50%
0.886 ?(0.56 - 1.2, n=18)
12%
0.895 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=153, last 2 years)
11%
Idle Average *
1.73
1.1
36%
1.93
-12%
1.96
-13%
1.76 ?(0.91 - 4.76, n=18)
-2%
1.447 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=153, last 2 years)
16%
Idle Maximum *
1.79
1.5
16%
1.96
-9%
2.01
-12%
1.92 ?(0.98 - 4.79, n=18)
-7%
1.608 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=153, last 2 years)
10%
Load Average *
3.05
2.9
5%
2.87
6%
3.86
-27%
3.86 ?(2.4 - 9.52, n=18)
-27%
6.41 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=148, last 2 years)
-110%
Load Maximum *
4.91
5
-2%
3.85
22%
5.62
-14%
5.45 ?(4.32 - 9.92, n=18)
-11%
9.61 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=148, last 2 years)
-96%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345Tooltip
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G: Ø3.18 (1.207-5.71)
Oppo Reno8 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G: Ø2.79 (0.898-5.35)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

00.20.40.60.91.11.31.51.71.92.22.42.62.833.23.53.73.94.1Tooltip
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.14 (2.9-4.32)
Oppo Reno8 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.07 (2.86-3.38)
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.289 (1.237-1.383)
Oppo Reno8 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.021 (0.997-1.153)

电池寿命

在我们的两次实际电池测试中，5000毫安时的电池在120赫兹的刷新率下提供了坚实的运行时间，这些测试是在调整后的150cd/m²的显示亮度下进行的，因此非常具有可比性。在WLAN测试中，Poco X4 Pro的运行时间为12.5小时，在禁用WLAN模块的情况下，视频播放时间还能再延长5小时。在我们的负载情况下，Poco手机持续了很长时间，超过7小时。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
26h 15min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 103)
12h 19min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
17h 13min
Load (maximum brightness)
7h 12min
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
5000 mAh		Motorola Moto G52
5000 mAh		Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
5000 mAh		Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
5000 mAh		Samsung Galaxy M23
5000 mAh		Realme 9 5G
5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
26%
12%
19%
36%
39%
Reader / Idle
1575
2183
39%
2098
33%
2722
73%
H.264
1033
1274
23%
1076
4%
1008
-2%
WiFi v1.3
739
1102
49%
842
14%
966
31%
1004
36%
1029
39%
Load
432
398
-8%
409
-5%
322
-25%

Pros

+ 吸引人的触觉
+ 双扬声器
+ 5G SoC
+ 漂亮的120赫兹OLED
+ 良好的108MP摄像头
+ 快速充电+配套电源适配器

Cons

- 运行时间可以做得更好
- 旧的Android
- 不可能有UHD视频

对Poco X4 Pro 5G的评价

在审查中。Poco X4 Pro 5G。样品设备由notebooksbilliger.de提供。
在审查中。Poco X4 Pro 5G。样品设备由notebooksbilliger.de提供。

Poco X4 Pro是一款成功的中档手机，只有几个弱点。为了支持5G连接，牺牲了前代产品的高性能，尽管如此，它还是很适合小米智能手机。安装的骁龙695在不到300美元的价格范围内提供了非常有竞争力的性能率，并为HFR游戏提供足够的图形能力。

中端系列在显示屏方面有了很大的飞跃。安装的120赫兹OLED面板不仅提供了比Poco X3 Pro的IPS屏幕高得多的对比度。 Poco X3 Pro，而且还更亮，照明效果更好。然而，这也使Poco X4 Pro的价格（RRP）比上一代产品增加了50美元。

遗憾的是，小米继续为其廉价的智能手机使用过时的Android 。不幸的是，对价格敏感的买家几乎没有任何替代品可供选择，因为三星不承诺对其M23 5G的任何更新保证。 Galaxy M23 5G也是如此。毕竟，韩国人的入门级设备已经有Android 12。另一个批评点延伸到Poco X4 Pro的耐力，因为它的5000毫安时电池和Realme 9 5G的运行时间。 realme 9 5G.

不想在中档手机中没有5G的买家会发现Poco X4 Pro总体上是一个强大的包装。

发现Poco X4 Pro有点太重和不方便的用户会发现一个同样强大的中档手机在 Redmi Note 11,这款手机不具备5G功能，但价格要低得多。

价格和可用性

Poco X4 Pro 5G似乎有两种配置。256GB+8GB或128GB+6GB。根据你的位置，前者或后者都可能有货。例如，我们发现，256GB+8GB的变体可以通过亚马逊买到。

128GB+6GB的版本有以下几种。

这些清单并不详尽，所以请通过您所在地区的亚马逊（如适用）或知名零售商进行查询。所述价格截至2022年7月30日，可能会有变化。

Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro - 08/30/2022 v7 (old)
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
85%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
93%
Connectivity
51 / 70 → 72%
Weight
88%
Battery
90%
Display
92%
Games Performance
34 / 64 → 53%
Application Performance
73 / 86 → 84%
Temperature
93%
Noise
100%
Audio
74 / 90 → 82%
Camera
62%
Average
77%
83%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 小米Poco X4 Pro 5G智能手机评论。5G手机配备108MP和120Hz OLED，价格低廉
Marcus Herbrich, 2022-07-31 (Update: 2024-08-15)