三星 Galaxy J3 (2016) Duos 智能手机简短评测
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
|
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 295 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 4.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 1.84
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016 Super AMOLED, 1280x720, 5" | Samsung Galaxy J5 Super AMOLED, 1280x720, 5" | Huawei P8 lite IPS, 1280x720, 5" | ZTE Blade V6 IPS, 1280x720, 5" | Coolpad Porto S IPS, 1280x720, 5" | Microsoft Lumia 650 OLED, 1280x720, 5" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | ||||||
Brightness middle | 295 | 349 18% | 365 24% | 336 14% | 407 38% | 349 18% |
Brightness | 299 | 353 18% | 353 18% | 315 5% | 403 35% | 353 18% |
Brightness Distribution | 96 | 93 -3% | 93 -3% | 81 -16% | 92 -4% | 92 -4% |
Black Level * | 0.42 | 0.39 | 0.5 | |||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.8 | 5.22 10% | 5.2 10% | 8.29 -43% | 7.9 -36% | 2.6 55% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.6 | 18.2 -112% | 8.2 5% | |||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.8 | 3.96 17% | 5.85 -22% | 8.57 -79% | 8.9 -85% | 1.8 62% |
Gamma | 1.84 120% | 2.08 106% | 2.17 101% | 1.96 112% | 2.46 89% | 2.06 107% |
CCT | 6252 104% | 7308 89% | 7252 90% | 8172 80% | 8332 78% | 6542 99% |
Contrast | 869 | 862 | 814 | |||
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 70.86 | |||||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 91.25 | 89.7 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 238.1 Hz | ||
The display backlight flickers at 238.1 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 238.1 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10 ms rise | |
↘ 10 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10 ms rise | |
↘ 10 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 29 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016 | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 | |
Huawei P8 lite | |
Coolpad Porto S |
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016 | |
Coolpad Porto S | |
Microsoft Lumia 650 |
Geekbench 3 | |
32 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016 | |
ZTE Blade V6 | |
Coolpad Porto S | |
32 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016 | |
ZTE Blade V6 | |
Coolpad Porto S |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016 | |
Huawei P8 lite | |
ZTE Blade V6 | |
Coolpad Porto S | |
Microsoft Lumia 650 | |
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016 | |
Huawei P8 lite | |
ZTE Blade V6 | |
Coolpad Porto S | |
Microsoft Lumia 650 |
3DMark | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016 | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 | |
Huawei P8 lite | |
ZTE Blade V6 | |
Coolpad Porto S | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016 | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 | |
Huawei P8 lite | |
ZTE Blade V6 | |
Coolpad Porto S | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016 | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 | |
Huawei P8 lite | |
ZTE Blade V6 | |
Coolpad Porto S | |
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Score (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016 | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 | |
Huawei P8 lite | |
ZTE Blade V6 | |
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Graphics (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016 | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 | |
Huawei P8 lite | |
ZTE Blade V6 | |
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Physics (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016 | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 | |
Huawei P8 lite | |
ZTE Blade V6 |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016 | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 | |
Coolpad Porto S |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016 | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 | |
Huawei P8 lite | |
ZTE Blade V6 | |
Coolpad Porto S | |
Microsoft Lumia 650 |
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016 | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 | |
Huawei P8 lite | |
ZTE Blade V6 | |
Coolpad Porto S | |
Microsoft Lumia 650 |
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016 | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 | |
Huawei P8 lite | |
Microsoft Lumia 650 |
* ... smaller is better
AndroBench 3-5 | |
Random Write 4KB (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016 | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 | |
Huawei P8 lite | |
ZTE Blade V6 | |
Coolpad Porto S | |
Random Read 4KB (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016 | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 | |
Huawei P8 lite | |
ZTE Blade V6 | |
Coolpad Porto S | |
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016 | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 | |
Huawei P8 lite | |
ZTE Blade V6 | |
Coolpad Porto S | |
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016 | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 | |
Huawei P8 lite | |
ZTE Blade V6 | |
Coolpad Porto S |
BaseMark OS II - Memory (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016 | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 | |
Huawei P8 lite | |
ZTE Blade V6 | |
Coolpad Porto S | |
Microsoft Lumia 650 |
Real Racing 3 | |||
Settings | Value | ||
high | 22 fps | ||
low | 54 fps |
Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
Settings | Value | ||
high | 15 fps | ||
very low | 27 fps |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.9 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.1 °C / 92 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Off / Standby | 0.03 / 0.39 Watt |
Idle | 0.96 / 1.14 / 1.23 Watt |
Load |
2.45 / 2.92 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Gossen Metrahit Energy |
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016 2.600 mAh | Samsung Galaxy J5 2.600 mAh | Huawei P8 lite 2.200 mAh | ZTE Blade V6 2.200 mAh | Coolpad Porto S 2.000 mAh | Microsoft Lumia 650 2.000 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -70% | -83% | -59% | -54% | -14% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.96 | 1.5 -56% | 1.4 -46% | 1.2 -25% | 1.16 -21% | 0.7 27% |
Idle Average * | 1.14 | 2.2 -93% | 2.3 -102% | 1.8 -58% | 2.21 -94% | 1.1 4% |
Idle Maximum * | 1.23 | 2.4 -95% | 2.5 -103% | 2.1 -71% | 2.24 -82% | 1.18 4% |
Load Average * | 2.45 | 3.5 -43% | 3.9 -59% | 4.1 -67% | 3.34 -36% | 4.04 -65% |
Load Maximum * | 2.92 | 4.8 -64% | 6 -105% | 5.1 -75% | 3.95 -35% | 4.07 -39% |
* ... smaller is better
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016 2.600 mAh | Samsung Galaxy J5 2.600 mAh | Huawei P8 lite 2.200 mAh | ZTE Blade V6 2.200 mAh | Coolpad Porto S 2.000 mAh | Microsoft Lumia 650 2.000 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -1% | -41% | -32% | 0% | -30% | |
Reader / Idle | 1212 | 1292 7% | 715 -41% | 910 -25% | ||
H.264 | 590 | 657 11% | 369 -37% | 424 -28% | 510 -14% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 502 | 495 -1% | 351 -30% | 400 -20% | 504 0% | 345 -31% |
Load | 433 | 350 -19% | 194 -55% | 230 -47% | 213 -51% |
Pros
Cons
Galaxy J3 (SM-J320F/DS)看起来像是去年的Galaxy J5经过重新设计的Galaxy J5 (2016)的缩水版本。优秀的AMOLED屏幕和类似的设计很明显是出自较老的姐妹机型。它依然可以让用户方便的更换电池。另外,这台设备搭配了坚固优质的塑料材质机身。它的其它优势还包括了准确的触控屏幕和长时间续航。两个SIM卡槽和一个micro-SD卡槽可以同时使用,可以给用户带来不少方便。
用户需要在相机上作出让步。我们的测试机搭配了品质一般的800万像素主相机,它只能在光线充足的环境下拍摄效果不错的照片。而且,在出厂状态下它只有4.35 GB的可用存储空间,在实际使用中应该会十分紧张。幸运的是,Galaxy J3支持USB OTG,应用可以移动到存储卡中,这应该可以缓解一部分存储空间的问题。尽管它搭配的Spreadtrum处理器在我们评测中表现垫底,这个缺点在日常使用中很难察觉到:这台测试机在使用中基本不会有卡顿延迟。
三星为用户带来了一台实用的入门级智能手机Galaxy J3 (2016),它在不高的价位上提供了不少的优势。消费者需要接受它的一些明显短板如内置存储设备和主相机的一般拍摄效果。
除了设计相同已停产的三星 Galaxy J5,在对比中列出的同类机型也都是不错的选择。不过,用户需要接受更短的电池续航,但是一些同价位机型采用了金属机身(ZTE Blade V6)或提供了更强的性能(Huawei P8 lite等)。
注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
-
06/17/2016 v5.1 (old)
Andreas Kilian