Notebookcheck Logo

三星Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G评论 - 两款智能手机的融合体

有一个集成的S Pen。

通过Galaxy S22 Ultra,三星结合了S系列和Note系列的顶级机型。这款智能手机在所有领域都使用了高端组件,并在超凡脱俗方面大做文章。在我们的测试中,找出这种组合是否成功,以及可能存在一些问题的地方。
5G Galaxy S Galaxy Note Touchscreen Smartphone AMD Android

三星Galaxy S22 Ultra代表了Galaxy S21 Ultra和Galaxy Note20 Ultra的现代共生关系,制造商选择了Note系列的外观。

三星使用最先进的技术,为智能手机配备了超亮的显示屏,支持1至120赫兹的自适应刷新率。虽然 Exynos 2200在欧洲使用,世界上大多数其他地区的机型都是基于骁龙8代.S笔也再次被包括在内,可以存放在外壳内。

Galaxy S22 Ultra提供四个存储版本和多达七个颜色的变体。

  • 8GB内存和128GB内部存储。1,249欧元(约合1,371美元)。
  • 12GB内存和256GB内部存储。1,349欧元(约合1,481美元)。
  • 12GB内存和512GB内部存储。1,449欧元(约合人民币1,591元)。
  • 12GB内存和1024GB内部存储。1,649欧元(约合人民币1,811元)

我们的测试装置是最小的幻影黑版本。

Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Galaxy S Series)
Processor
Samsung Exynos 2200 8 x 1.8 - 2.8 GHz, Exynos X2 / Cortex-A710 / A510
Graphics adapter
Memory
8 GB 
, LPDDR5
Display
6.80 inch 19.3:9, 3088 x 1440 pixel 501 PPI, capacitive, dynamic AMOLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 101.2 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyroscope, proximity sensor, compass, barometer, OTG, UWB, DeX, Ant+
Networking
Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (band 1, 2, 4, 5, 8), LTE (band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66), 5G Sub6 (band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.9 x 163.3 x 77.9
Battery
18.83 Wh, 5000 mAh Lithium-Ion, 3.8 V
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 108 MPix (f/1.8, 24 mm, 1/1.33", 0.8 µm, OIS) + 10 MPix (10x optical zoom, f/4.9, 230 mm, 1/3.52", 1.12 µm, OIS) + 10 MPix (3x optical zoom, f/2.4, 70 mm, 1/3.52", 1.12 µm, OIS) + 12 MPix (ultra wide, f/2.2, 13 mm, 1/2.55", 1.4 µm); Camera2-API: full
Secondary Camera: 40 MPix (f/2.2, 26 mm, 1/2.82", 0.7 µm)
Additional features
Keyboard: onscreen, USB cable (Type-C to Type-C), SIM tool, One UI 4.1, 24 Months Warranty, IP68; dual band GNSS: GPS, Glonass, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS; photo/video aspect ratio: 4:3, 16:9, 1:1, 19.5:9; Head SAR: 1.049 W/kg, Body SAR: 1.585 W/kg, fanless, waterproof
Weight
228 g
Price
1249 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
89.4 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2022
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920
228 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.80"3088x1440
89.6 %
v7 (old)
08 / 2020
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11
208 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.90"3088x1440
90.4 %
v7 (old)
08 / 2021
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14
227 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.80"3200x1440
87.6 %
v7 (old)
02 / 2022
Xiaomi 12 Pro
SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730
204 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.73"3200x1440
89.2 %
v7 (old)
04 / 2022
Oppo Find X5 Pro
SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730
221 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"3216x1440
90.5 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2021
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15, A15 GPU 5-Core
238 g128 GB NVMe6.70"2778x1284

从正面看,Galaxy S22 Ultra与Note20 Ultra没有区别。 Galaxy 笔记20 Ultra.外形完全相同,只有当你看到摄像头时才会注意到你在看一个不同的型号。S22 Ultra共提供七种颜色。虽然幻影黑、白色、绿色和勃艮第色可以从不同的供应商那里买到,但石墨色、红色和天蓝色仍保留在三星在线商店。独有的颜色也不适用于1-TB型号,它们总是有一个黑色的边框,背面用相应的颜色加以强调。

这款三星智能手机的重量为228克(约8盎司),相当重。 然而,由于圆润的边缘和相当大的尺寸,这并不构成什么障碍。质量中心也在智能手机的下半部分,这一点我们非常喜欢。厚度被规定为8.1毫米(约0.32英寸),而我们测量的结果甚至少了半毫米。摄像头伸出机身达2.65毫米(约0.1英寸),导致S22 Ultra在平面上晃动得很厉害。

做工是一流的。缝隙非常紧密,而且大部分是平齐的。在我们的测试装置中,我们只在背面的一个角落检测到一个微米级的微小不规则。当我们试图扭动智能手机时,我们只能让它产生非常轻微的吱吱声。正面和背面都有康宁大猩猩Victus+保护,框架由所谓的盔甲铝制成,这应该是一种特别坚固的合金。

Galaxy S22 Ultra的防尘防水性能符合IP68认证,因此它既防尘又防水。然而,在小字中,三星将后者限制在1.5米深的淡水中浸泡最多30分钟。卡槽的盖子与边框齐平,卡托可以接受最多两张nanoSIM卡。

尺寸比较

165.1 mm 75.6 mm 8.9 mm 227 g164.8 mm 77.2 mm 8.1 mm 208 g163.6 mm 74.6 mm 8.66 mm 204 g163.3 mm 77.9 mm 8.9 mm 228 g163.7 mm 73.9 mm 8.5 mm 221 g160.8 mm 78.1 mm 7.7 mm 238 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

设备 - 不支持microSD的三星智能手机

三星Galaxy S22 Ultra提供了一个快速的USB连接,按照USB 3.2(Gen.1)规格操作,并支持有线图像输出。三星的DeX桌面模式也再次包括在内,可以通过有线模式或无线方式(通过Miracast)投射到连接的显示器上。

过去的电源键现在是一个多功能键,允许你直接打开Bixby语音助手。 不幸的是,你不能用其他助手代替,但你可以为该键分配其他功能。

集成了一个超宽带芯片(UWB),用于准确定位一个可选的Galaxy SmartTag Plus。你只能在没有通过microSD卡进行存储扩展的情况下生活,因为这不被支持。

顶部: 麦克风
顶部: 麦克风
左侧
左侧
右边:音量、多功能键
右边:音量、多功能键
底部。SIM卡、麦克风、USB、扬声器、S Pen
底部。SIM卡、麦克风、USB、扬声器、S Pen

软件--目前的Android ,并保证长期的更新。

三星Galaxy S22 Ultra搭载了谷歌Android 12和内部的One UI 4.1用户界面。这款智能手机应该会收到四个主要的更新,所以你可以期待得到Android 16。此外,每月的安全补丁保证5年。这是模范的!

三星自己的应用商店,即Galaxy Store,也再次被安装。除了谷歌的儿童保护之外,还有一个针对很小的孩子的儿童模式。通过三星DeX,还有一个额外的桌面模式,现在不仅可以在外部显示器上显示,而且还可以在Windows PC上作为虚拟机运行。除了通过拖放传输数据外,这还可以直接在PC上运行Android 应用程序。一个非常小的失望是,目前这只能在有线模式下实现。

通信和GNSS - 精确定位和6-GHz WLAN

三星Galaxy S22 Ultra能够使用目前所有的移动通信标准,包括5G。然而,欧洲版本仍然缺乏对毫米波的支持,尽管从纸面上看,Exynos 2200的调制解调器应该能够支持这个。这就留下了稍慢的5G Sub6,尽管在理论上,这也允许数据传输率高达5.1Gbit/s的下载和2.55Gbit/s的上传。

在WLAN方面,Galaxy 智能手机可以使用所有可用的选项,支持Wi-Fi 6E,包括6GHz频段。这允许使用我们的华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000参考路由器获得极高和稳定的数据速率。不幸的是,这只是在6-GHz频段的情况,当Wi-Fi 6在5-GHz范围内使用时,S22 Ultra仍然低于这一标准的可能性。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1569 (1493min - 1651max) MBit/s +201%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1214 (516min - 1524max) MBit/s +133%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
890 (433min - 934max) MBit/s +71%
Average of class Smartphone
  (40.5 - 1810, n=186, last 2 years)
729 MBit/s +40%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
521 (311min - 704max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1465 (1307min - 1536max) MBit/s +105%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1352 (1210min - 1436max) MBit/s +89%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
820 (799min - 837max) MBit/s +15%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
716 (539min - 791max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone
  (34.8 - 1875, n=184, last 2 years)
714 MBit/s 0%
iperf3 transmit AX12
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
875 (836min - 889max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
803 (437min - 889max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
633 (523min - 703max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
772 (691min - 832max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
922 (904min - 928max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
169 (156min - 180max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
870 (841min - 882max) MBit/s
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
718 (707min - 724max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1702 (1642min - 1735max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone
  (668 - 1864, n=76, last 2 years)
1371 MBit/s -19%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1704 (852min - 1767max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone
  (229 - 1902, n=76, last 2 years)
1440 MBit/s -15%
09018027036045054063072081090099010801170126013501440153016201710Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Samsung Exynos 2200, Samsung Xclipse 920; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1676 (852-1767)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Samsung Exynos 2200, Samsung Xclipse 920; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1694 (1642-1735)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Samsung Exynos 2200, Samsung Xclipse 920; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø715 (539-791)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Apple A15 Bionic, Apple A15 GPU 5-Core; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø718 (707-724)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Samsung Exynos 2200, Samsung Xclipse 920; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø510 (311-704)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Apple A15 Bionic, Apple A15 GPU 5-Core; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø875 (836-889)
GPS测试:户外
在户外
GPS测试:在室内
在室内

由于Galaxy S22 Ultra支持广泛的GNSS频谱,即使在室内也能快速确定其位置并具有很高的精确度。

当三星智能手机与Garmin Venu 2在我们的短途自行车旅行中进行比较时,它产生的路线记录与健身智能手表的记录一样好,但在确定海拔高度方面甚至更准确。因此,S22 Ultra应该非常适用于所有需要准确定位的使用场景。

GNSS测试路线:环湖
GNSS测试路线:环湖
GNSS测试路线:转折点
GNSS测试路线:转折点
全球导航卫星系统测试路线:概述
全球导航卫星系统测试路线:概述

电话功能和语音质量

三星Galaxy S22 Ultra以出色的语音质量脱颖而出。听筒产生的声音非常自然,不受任何轻微噪音干扰的影响。 即使周围环境变得更响亮,噪音也能在很大程度上被过滤掉,用户的声音只听起来有点鼻音。在扬声器模式下,用户的声音会以最小的回声重现。随着距离的增加,这种效果会略微增加,音量也会降低,但在超过两米半的距离上,声音仍然清晰可辨。

Galaxy S22 Ultra支持VoLTE以及WLAN通话。虽然它提供了两个nanoSIM卡插槽,但你也可以使用eSIM卡来代替第二张物理SIM卡。该系统没有实现SIP账户控制。

摄像机 - 完善成熟的设置

照片模式下的自拍
照片模式
纵向模式下的自拍
纵向模式
后期处理中的过滤选项
过滤选项

根据数据表,Galaxy S22 Ultra的摄像头在技术上与前代产品相同。变化主要发生在图像算法的调整和新的ISP提供的更广泛的选项上。

前置摄像头的分辨率为4000万像素,图像像素被合并为1000万像素。自动对焦功能继续被包括在内。Galaxy S22 Ultra成功地拍摄了非常平衡的自拍,通过高色彩准确性和锐利度来区分自己。相机应用程序也提供了许多调整选项。视频可以以高达60 FPS的超高清分辨率进行记录。

背面四摄像头设置的核心是一个108MP的传感器,这可能是一个优化的三星ISOCELL HM3.像素分选再次被用于主要在弱光条件下获得更好的结果。将名义上0.8微米大小的9个像素相加,得到一个有效尺寸为2.4微米的超级像素。然后,处理后的结果只有12MP的分辨率。然而,如果你愿意,你也可以创建具有完整分辨率或RAW格式的图片。

三星为所有镜头提供双像素自动对焦的事实,以及额外的激光自动对焦,值得肯定。主传感器和两个远程镜头支持光学图像稳定(OIS)。

虽然日光下的图像质量很好,但仍有一些改进的余地。激进的锐化也导致了一些细节的损失。该 S21 Ultra的前身最初也有一些类似的问题,但这些问题通过软件更新逐渐得到了纠正。超广角镜头提供了良好的效果,但在深度锐度方面显示出一些不足。然而,与许多竞争对手相比,没有明显的像差。 两个远摄镜头各有10MP的分辨率,并分别提供3倍和10倍(潜望镜相机)光学变焦。虽然继续有100倍数字变焦的能力,但效果相当平庸。另一方面,图像稳定工作得出奇地好,仍然允许你在变焦水平甚至超过50倍的情况下自由拍照。

视频可以用主摄像头以8K(24FPS)录制,但这样一来,许多功能和附加镜头就无法使用。你将获得4K(高达60 FPS)的所有功能,但你不能在录制期间切换镜头。这只有在30FPS的超高清或30和60FPS的全高清中才能实现。录像非常有吸引力,甚至可以用HDR10+(仅30FPS)拍摄。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraUltra-wide angle5x ZoomLow-Light

在受控的光线条件下,我们看到与日常操作类似的结果。特别是图像传感器的高分辨率并不一定是一个优势,因为即使在我们的测试图表图像的中心,全尺寸的细节也显得略微模糊。渐变的色彩变化被非常干净地再现出来。

我们喜欢这种色彩再现,它显得相对自然。三星只显示绿色的色调略微太饱和。

ColorChecker
8.9 ∆E
5 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
2.6 ∆E
4 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
8 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G: 6.12 ∆E min: 2.2 - max: 14.29 ∆E
ColorChecker
14.9 ∆E
17.8 ∆E
17.2 ∆E
17.7 ∆E
21.6 ∆E
26.4 ∆E
20.7 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
16.1 ∆E
21.5 ∆E
27.3 ∆E
15.4 ∆E
22.2 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
20 ∆E
20.1 ∆E
28.2 ∆E
22.5 ∆E
22.7 ∆E
27.7 ∆E
25.7 ∆E
21.6 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G: 19.84 ∆E min: 9.11 - max: 28.23 ∆E

附件和保修 - S22 Ultra又没有充电器了

三星Galaxy S22 Ultra盒子里的内容变的微不足道,只包括一条USB-C电缆和一个SIM卡工具。可选择的是,三星还为智能手机提供保护套和其他配件。

保修期为24个月,并可以通过三星关怀+保险套餐来扩大保修范围。保险套餐,一次性费用为149欧元(约合164美元)。

输入设备和操作 - 超声波指纹传感器和S Pen

三星Galaxy S22 Ultra的玻璃表面具有出色的滑动特性,可同时识别多达10个触摸点,快速而准确地执行命令。

S22 Ultra的亮点是S Pen,其功能与Note20 Ultra相同。 Galaxy Note20 Ultra.它还支持蓝牙以及手势的远程控制选项。你甚至可以在两个型号之间切换笔。S笔继续支持屏幕外的笔记,像往常一样,你可以在屏幕截图上写字,或通过手写识别直接在Word中格式化文字。这支小笔提供了众多选项和良好的书写体验。

生物识别安全由显示屏下方的超声波指纹传感器提供,它以吸引人的速度解锁智能手机,并提供非常高的识别率。此外,还有一个不太安全的使用前置摄像头的人脸识别方法。

显示屏 -Galaxy 智能手机中的超亮120-Hz AMOLED。

子像素网格
子像素网格

Galaxy S22 Ultra有一个6.8英寸(17.27厘米)的动态AMOLED显示屏,可选择提供QHD+或Full HD+分辨率,非常清晰地显示内容。最大刷新率为120赫兹,应该可以通过自适应控制降低到1赫兹。然而,我们无法确认这一点,因为我们在测试中只看到最低刷新率为24赫兹。

在亮度方面,这款三星智能手机做出了强大的努力,通过激活亮度传感器的全白区域显示,实现了高达1111cd/m²的亮度。这使它成为我们数据库中最亮的智能手机显示屏。随着面板上暗区和亮区的均匀分布,最大亮度增加到1,665 cd/m²(APL50)和1,788 cd/m²(APL18)。

那些不想把亮度调节留给传感器的人,将得到最高442 cd/m²的亮度。如果亮度传感器被停用,三星还在设置中提供了一个 "额外亮度 "功能,可以将亮度提高到716 cd/m²。在另一个极端,面板可以调低到1.83cd/m²,这里三星提供了 "额外调光 "功能,允许你将亮度降低到0.45cd/m²。

在Galaxy S22 Ultra中,我们也能够看到OLED典型的闪烁。然而,其频率非常恒定,类似于直流调光。根据刷新率的不同,它的工作频率为120或240赫兹,这意味着该面板对敏感用户造成的不适感应该相对较小。

这款三星智能手机还包括一个可全面配置的永远在线的显示屏,以及一个额外的舒适模式,使显示屏更容易被人看到。

1109
cd/m²
1073
cd/m²
1111
cd/m²
1075
cd/m²
1077
cd/m²
1110
cd/m²
1095
cd/m²
1079
cd/m²
1111
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1111 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1093.3 cd/m² Minimum: 0.45 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 1077 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 1.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.37
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Dynamic AMOLED, 3088x1440, 6.8"
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Dynamic AMOLED, 3088x1440, 6.9"
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3200x1440, 6.8"
Xiaomi 12 Pro
AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.7"
Oppo Find X5 Pro
AMOLED, 3216x1440, 6.7"
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
OLED, 2778x1284, 6.7"
Screen
-137%
-37%
-19%
-7%
14%
Brightness middle
1077
860
-20%
910
-16%
959
-11%
746
-31%
1049
-3%
Brightness
1093
878
-20%
913
-16%
977
-11%
744
-32%
1060
-3%
Brightness Distribution
97
96
-1%
98
1%
96
-1%
97
0%
98
1%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.2
4.5
-275%
2
-67%
1.1
8%
0.9
25%
0.78
35%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2
10.4
-420%
3.1
-55%
3.1
-55%
1.6
20%
1.72
14%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.3
2.4
-85%
2.2
-69%
1.9
-46%
1.6
-23%
0.8
38%
Gamma
2.37 93%
2 110%
2.06 107%
2.22 99%
2.23 99%
2.181 101%
CCT
6526 100%
6466 101%
6512 100%
6498 100%
6499 100%
6559 99%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 120 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最低亮度
最低限度
25%的亮度
25%
50%的亮度
50%
75%的亮度
75%
最大亮度(无传感器)
100%

用固定的变焦水平和各种亮度调整进行测量(Rigol MSO5102)。

我们用照片光谱仪和CalMAN分析软件来评估显示的准确性。我们在 "自然 "模式下得到了最自然的显示效果,其中灰度以及颜色都接近理想状态。然而,此时只有较小的sRGB色彩空间可用。

在交付状态下,"鲜艳 "模式产生较冷的颜色,但如果你将白平衡滑块移动到称为 "温暖 "的第一个步骤,灰度就和 "自然 "模式一样好。只是颜色没有那么准确,因为 "鲜艳 "模式下的饱和度会更强。另一方面,那么更大的DCI-P3色彩空间将是可用的。

灰度(配置文件:鲜艳,白平衡:第1步温暖;色彩目标空间:DCI-P3)。
灰度(配置文件:鲜艳,白平衡:第1步温暖;色彩目标空间:DCI-P3)。
颜色(配置文件:鲜艳,白平衡:第1步温暖;色彩目标空间:DCI-P3)
颜色(配置文件:鲜艳,白平衡:第1步温暖;色彩目标空间:DCI-P3)
色彩空间(配置文件:鲜艳,白平衡:第1步温暖;色彩目标空间:DCI-P3)
色彩空间(配置文件:鲜艳,白平衡:第1步温暖;色彩目标空间:DCI-P3)
饱和度(配置文件:鲜艳,白平衡:第1步温暖;色彩目标空间:DCI-P3)。
饱和度(配置文件:鲜艳,白平衡:第1步温暖;色彩目标空间:DCI-P3)。
灰度(配置文件:自然;色彩目标空间:sRGB)
灰度(配置文件:自然;色彩目标空间:sRGB)
颜色(配置文件:自然;颜色目标空间:sRGB)
颜色(配置文件:自然;颜色目标空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(配置文件:自然;色彩目标空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(配置文件:自然;色彩目标空间:sRGB)
饱和度(配置文件:自然;色彩目标空间:sRGB)
饱和度(配置文件:自然;色彩目标空间:sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.501 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.7 ms rise
↘ 0.801 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
0.872 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.448 ms rise
↘ 0.424 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

三星Galaxy S22 Ultra可以在户外使用,没有任何限制。这不仅是高亮度储备的结果,也是玻璃表面低反射的结果。

此外,亮度传感器的速度非常快,不会对面板的亮度吝啬。

正如预期,可视角度的稳定性非常好。从非常陡峭的视角来看,AMOLED显示屏只显示了一个略微偏冷和偏暗的图像,但除此之外,显示效果仍然无懈可击。

三星Galaxy S22 Ultra的可视角度稳定性
三星Galaxy S22 Ultra的可视角度稳定性

性能--Exynos 2200并不是宣布的游戏改变者

在欧洲,三星Galaxy S22 Ultra使用了一个 Exynos 2200与8或12GB的LPDDR5工作内存。为什么三星决定退一步,在小存储配置中仅仅使用8GB的内存,对我们来说仍然是一个谜。

不幸的是,基准测试并没有证实这是一个好的决定。虽然CPU的性能肯定非常好,但Exynos 2200的排名却落后于 骁龙8代Apple的A15.在Geekbench的多核测试中,即使是它的前辈,即 Exynos 2100,也能勉强击败它。

AnTuTu基准测试显示了类似的性能差异。然而,这些也可以追溯到SoC的冷却不足,因为当我们在冰箱中运行AnTuTu时,结果增加到878,398分。Exynos在人工智能加速方面也很落后。虽然它在Procyon基准测试中成功地将其前辈的性能提高了一倍,但骁龙8的速度仍是其六倍。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
1742 Points +51%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1257 Points +9%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1192 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
1154 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 2200
  (1133 - 1161, n=4)
1148 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
1106 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=172, last 2 years)
995 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
940 Points -19%
Multi-Core
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
4914 Points +38%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
3738 Points +5%
Average Samsung Exynos 2200
  (3474 - 3768, n=4)
3600 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
3583 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
3560 Points
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
3488 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6687, n=172, last 2 years)
3312 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
2787 Points -22%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
14339 Points +14%
Average Samsung Exynos 2200
  (12579 - 14998, n=4)
13805 Points +10%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
13131 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 24088, n=190, last 2 years)
12976 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
12579 Points
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
12144 Points -3%
Antutu v9
Total Score
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
962824 Points +37%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
856953 Points +22%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
800222 Points +14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (99654 - 1650926, n=104, last 2 years)
798401 Points +13%
Average Samsung Exynos 2200
  (704479 - 850401, n=4)
797881 Points +13%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
749520 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
704479 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
653269 Points -7%
CPU
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
227638 Points +56%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
215836 Points +48%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
199585 Points +37%
Average Samsung Exynos 2200
  (145904 - 220142, n=4)
195898 Points +34%
Average of class Smartphone
  (30382 - 365054, n=104, last 2 years)
188492 Points +29%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
173967 Points +19%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
172621 Points +18%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
145904 Points
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
8124 Points +29%
Average Samsung Exynos 2200
  (6319 - 7186, n=4)
6919 Points +9%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
6799 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
6319 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 11976, n=151, last 2 years)
6297 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
6247 Points -1%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
6007 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4791 Points -24%
System
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
19657 Points +88%
Average Samsung Exynos 2200
  (10464 - 11373, n=4)
11032 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
10936 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
10464 Points
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
10340 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 16475, n=151, last 2 years)
10163 Points -3%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
10006 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
9024 Points -14%
Memory
Average Samsung Exynos 2200
  (6212 - 7614, n=4)
6771 Points +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 12716, n=151, last 2 years)
6767 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
6588 Points +6%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
6523 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
6212 Points
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
5125 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
3811 Points -39%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
3612 Points -42%
Graphics
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
25642 Points +50%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
21944 Points +28%
Average Samsung Exynos 2200
  (17104 - 17941, n=4)
17447 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
17104 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=151, last 2 years)
16908 Points -1%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
15216 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
14362 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
10646 Points -38%
Web
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
2392 Points +67%
Average Samsung Exynos 2200
  (1434 - 1960, n=4)
1768 Points +23%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1669 Points +16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2145, n=151, last 2 years)
1564 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
1471 Points +3%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1444 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
1439 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
1434 Points
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
68880 Points +535%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
63613 Points +487%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 74958, n=143, last 2 years)
16841 Points +55%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
10841 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 2200
  (10374 - 10841, n=2)
10608 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
5725 Points -47%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
5029 Points -54%
Geekbench ML
0.5 TensorFlow Lite CPU 0.5
Average of class Smartphone
  (215 - 1418, n=12, last 2 years)
598 Points +79%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
334 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 2200
  ()
334 Points 0%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
284 Points -15%
0.5 TensorFlow Lite GPU
Average of class Smartphone
  (474 - 2842, n=12, last 2 years)
1673 Points +99%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1631 Points +94%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
842 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 2200
  ()
842 Points 0%
0.5 TensorFlow Lite NNAPI / Core ML
Average of class Smartphone
  (344 - 3638, n=10, last 2 years)
1269 Points +216%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
441 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
402 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 2200
  ()
402 Points 0%
AImark - Score v2.x
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
241222 Points +3780%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
107460 Points +1628%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
72572 Points +1067%
Average Samsung Exynos 2200
  (6217 - 6487, n=3)
6342 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
6217 Points
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
5982 Points -4%

全新的 Xclipse 920被用作集成图形单元。它基于AMD的RDNA 2架构,这家韩国制造商称赞它是一个游戏规则的改变者。

CPU和系统基准测试的印象也延续到图形基准测试中。Galaxy S22 Ultra在这里也落后于其竞争对手,其中一些甚至快33%。虽然首次支持光线追踪(RT)和可变速率着色(VRS)在理论上是伟大的,但在没有软件支持的情况下,它们目前没有带来任何好处。

3DMark / Wild Life Score
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9927 Points +37%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9826 Points +36%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
9680 Points +34%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7236 Points
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5756 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4248 Points -41%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
11688 Points +60%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10384 Points +42%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10175 Points +40%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7288 Points
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5873 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4162 Points -43%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
3080 Points +51%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2609 Points +28%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2575 Points +26%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2044 Points
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1871 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1418 Points -31%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
2817 Points +47%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2523 Points +32%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2513 Points +31%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1916 Points
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1758 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1391 Points -27%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10005 Points +16%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9149 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8612 Points
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8345 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6830 Points -21%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
5782 Points -33%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
18090 Points +39%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
16202 Points +25%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13950 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
12972 Points
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10794 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8239 Points -36%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4651 Points +18%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4273 Points +8%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4150 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3957 Points
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3902 Points -1%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
1902 Points -52%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
117 fps +8%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
108 fps
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
90 fps -17%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
69 fps -36%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps -44%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -44%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
251 fps +34%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
227.9 fps +22%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
187 fps
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
181 fps -3%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
117 fps -37%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
96 fps -49%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
121 fps +3%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
118 fps
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
110 fps -7%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
104 fps -12%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps -49%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -49%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
425 fps +41%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
409.6 fps +36%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
380 fps +26%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
302 fps
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
154 fps -49%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
145 fps -52%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
87 fps +23%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
71 fps
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
61 fps -14%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps -15%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56 fps -21%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
51 fps -28%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
169 fps +33%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
144 fps +13%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
127 fps
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
111 fps -13%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
74 fps -42%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
65 fps -49%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
53.2 fps +36%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
39 fps
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
39 fps 0%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
36 fps -8%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
34 fps -13%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
30 fps -23%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
92.9 fps +37%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
71 fps +4%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68 fps
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
63 fps -7%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58 fps -15%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
38 fps -44%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
54.8 fps +77%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
36 fps +16%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
34 fps +10%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
31 fps
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
27 fps -13%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
26 fps -16%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
40 fps +33%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
37.9 fps +26%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
34 fps +13%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
30 fps
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
28 fps -7%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
22 fps -27%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
59.1 fps +41%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53 fps +26%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
49 fps +17%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 fps +5%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42 fps
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
37 fps -12%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
108 fps +59%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
94 fps +38%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
92 fps +35%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
69 fps +1%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68 fps
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
43 fps -37%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal / Overall Score
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2927 Points
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2703 Points -8%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2293 Points -22%
Basemark GPU 1.2 / Vulkan Medium Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
136.6 (66.45min - 241.12max) fps
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
84.4 (17.95min - 272.19max) fps -38%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
fps -100%
Basemark GPU 1.2 / Vulkan Medium Native
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
78.8 (48.73min - 159.49max) fps
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
52.1 (22.24min - 74.36max) fps -34%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
fps -100%
Basemark GPU 1.2 / OpenGL Medium Native
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59.8 (16.66min - 145.51max) fps +75%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
34.15 (14.28min - 181.12max) fps
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
fps -100%
Basemark GPU 1.2 / OpenGL Medium Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98.8 (21.37min - 228.87max) fps +206%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
32.27 (11.43min - 230.32max) fps
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
fps -100%

在浏览器基准测试中,Galaxy S22 Ultra显示出良好的性能,一直只排在iPhone后面。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (Safari 15)
181.8 Points +88%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=161, last 2 years)
120.4 Points +24%
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99)
103 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99)
96.8 Points
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)
84.1 Points -13%
Average Samsung Exynos 2200 (13.8 - 107.4, n=4)
78.6 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra (Chrome 88)
76.6 Points -21%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra (Chrome 84)
56.8 Points -41%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (Safari 15)
402.9 Points +101%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99)
200 Points
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99)
172.8 Points -14%
Average Samsung Exynos 2200 (118.9 - 200, n=3)
151.5 Points -24%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)
147.5 Points -26%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra (Chrome 88)
127.3 Points -36%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra (Chrome 84)
96.2 Points -52%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (Safari 15)
242 runs/min +124%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years)
136.2 runs/min +26%
Average Samsung Exynos 2200 (105 - 137, n=4)
115.3 runs/min +7%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99)
108 runs/min
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99)
104 runs/min -4%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra (Chrome 88)
84.1 runs/min -22%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)
73.5 runs/min -32%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (Safari 15)
248 Points +100%
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)
148.7 Points +20%
Average Samsung Exynos 2200 (124 - 153, n=3)
142 Points +15%
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99)
133 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra (Chrome 88)
132 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99)
124 Points
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)
119 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra (Chrome 84)
102 Points -18%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (Safari 15)
63831 Points +87%
Average Samsung Exynos 2200 (34055 - 51202, n=4)
42162 Points +24%
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99)
38407 Points +13%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years)
37161 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99)
34055 Points
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)
29750 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra (Chrome 88)
27275 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra (Chrome 84)
19695 Points -42%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra (Chrome 84)
2296 ms * -82%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra (Chrome 88)
1786 ms * -42%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years)
1568 ms * -25%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)
1330 ms * -6%
Average Samsung Exynos 2200 (840 - 1566, n=4)
1306 ms * -4%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99)
1259 ms *
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99)
1125 ms * +11%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (Safari 15)
414.8 ms * +67%
Sunspider - 1.0 Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra (Chrome 88)
313.2 ms * -11%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)
302.5 ms * -7%
Average Samsung Exynos 2200 ()
282 ms * -0%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99)
281.5 ms *
Average of class Smartphone (156.3 - 197, n=4, last 2 years)
182.8 ms * +35%

* ... smaller is better

虽然UFS 3.1存储的速度如预期的那样非常高,但三星并没有在这个领域取得顶级地位。然而,这些差异在日常操作中已不明显。

Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5GSamsung Galaxy Note20 UltraSamsung Galaxy S21 UltraXiaomi 12 ProOppo Find X5 ProAverage 128 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-20%
1%
25%
-25%
-17%
11%
Sequential Read 256KB
1653
1782
8%
1710
3%
1620
-2%
1410
-15%
Sequential Write 256KB
1074
802
-25%
1077
0%
1465
36%
894
-17%
Random Read 4KB
322.3
186.7
-42%
316.7
-2%
324.9
1%
183.7
-43%
Random Write 4KB
273.1
217.7
-20%
279.5
2%
448.9
64%
210.4
-23%

游戏 - 浪费了大量的潜力

理论上讲, Xclipse 920的Galaxy S22 Ultra提供了足够的性能,可以在高质量的设置下流畅地显示所有当前的游戏,但在这一点上,现实看起来有所不同。

这并不是说它在保持显示不卡顿方面真的有任何问题,因为我们用GameBench显示,在测试的游戏中没有明显的帧数下降。相反,问题是,高清晰度或高帧率设置根本无法使用。例如,"PUBG Mobile"甚至被赞誉为合作伙伴的游戏,只能在高清设置下以30 FPS进行游戏。我们本来以为这里的帧率是两倍,而且细节水平也更高。类似的行为可以在《使命召唤》中看到,我们只能在低细节水平下玩,而《荒野大镖客》缺乏90或120 FPS的HFR设置,这些设置甚至可以在 Galaxy S21 FE.显然,在优化新的GPU方面仍有一些工作要做,以便它能够公正地实现其高端雄心。

PUBG手机版
PUBG手机版
使命召唤》手机版
使命召唤》手机版
英雄联盟。野生裂缝
英雄联盟。野生裂缝
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G; Call of Duty Mobile; 1.0.30: Ø59.9 (56-60)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G; League of Legends: Wild Rift; 3.0.0.5295: Ø59.5 (55-61)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 1.9.0: Ø29.8 (26-31)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G; PUBG Mobile; HD; 1.9.0: Ø29.9 (28-31)

排放 - 冷却节流Galaxy S22 Ultra

温度

虽然三星Galaxy S22 Ultra的表面温度在持续负载下明显增加,但智能手机只在一些地方变得手热。

为了更好地评估这种情况下SoC的性能,我们运行GFXBench电池测试以及3DMark的压力测试。尽管第一个测试完成了它的运行,但应用程序在调用结果时崩溃了。另一方面,3DMark显示性能大幅下降,超过42%。虽然这是一个很大的问题,但S22 Ultra的性能仍然与小米12 Pro的水平相似。 小米12 Pro的水平相似。 骁龙8代.

Max. Load
 34.7 °C34.3 °C36.1 °C 
 35.3 °C34.8 °C34.9 °C 
 35.7 °C34.7 °C33.7 °C 
Maximum: 36.1 °C
Average: 34.9 °C
32.3 °C34.8 °C34.3 °C
31.7 °C33.4 °C34.5 °C
31.5 °C32.5 °C33.6 °C
Maximum: 34.8 °C
Average: 33.2 °C
Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.9 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.1 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.8 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.1 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
80.1 (44.5min) % +37%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
64.7 (22.3min) % +11%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
64.4 (3633min) % +10%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
62.7 (37.2min) % +7%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58.5 (25.9min) %
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
47.2 (27.4min) % -19%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
26.6 % -55%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
77 (12.3min) % +25%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
62.7 (9.64min) % +1%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
61.8 (7.76min) %
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
61.3 (1197min) % -1%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59.8 (7.01min) % -3%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
38.6 (546min) % -38%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
% -100%
0510152025303540455055Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.8.1: Ø9.2 (7.76-12.6)
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.8.1: Ø10.9 (9.64-15.4)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 0.0.0.0: Ø13.1 (12.3-16)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø32.2 (25.9-44.2)
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø41.7 (37.2-59.4)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø47 (44.5-55.5)
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø37.8 (27.4-58)

发言人

三星Galaxy S22 Ultra的两个扬声器能产生良好的声音输出,并能变得非常响亮。即使低频范围有所欠缺,但三星智能手机的声音仍然相对平衡。

那些喜欢通过蓝牙无线收听声音的人将不得不继续满足于支持的音频编解码器(SBC、AAC、aptX和LDAC)的选择略有减少。另一方面,你可以同时向两个设备输出声音,但届时将只能使用SBC编解码器。此外,三星是唯一一家允许在设置中限制音量的Android 智能手机制造商,这非常有用,特别是对儿童而言。

有线耳机可以通过USB端口连接,但你可能需要一个可选的适配器。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203533.9253030.93121.926.84022.832.35034.842.56324.331.68023.23310027.831.512514.733.716020.950.220021.250.725017.55531513.46140014.164.150013.167.563011.571.480013.175.5100011.780.5125011.879.216001380.2200012.180.6250012.180.8315012.380.4400012.577.450001378.1630013.272.780001367.21000013.768.81250013.569.31600014.266.4SPL25.190.2N0.779.8median 13.1median 71.4Delta1.511.234.738.935.637.933.93333.436.733.73728.930.322.925.721.532.421.441.716.248.613.850.112.253.510.754.58.658.410.461.911.962.913.365.710.266.99.269.59.269.99.771.310.770.812.669.114.267.215.358.314.663.615.767.416.571.815.86516.455.525.280.20.647.3median 13.3median 63.62.87.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5GApple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 5000毫安时的银河系运行时间

消耗功率

在功耗方面,只要没有负载,Galaxy S22 Ultra显示出自己非常高效。一旦对Exynos有更多的需求,这款智能手机就会比竞争对手从其储备中拉出更多的电力。

当通过电线连接时,三星智能手机的充电功率可以达到45瓦。通过无线方式,最高可以达到15瓦,而且还支持反向无线充电。使用三星原装的25瓦充电器,完全充电需要98分钟,43分钟后达到50%的目标,72分钟后达到80%的目标。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.02 / 0.05 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.58 / 0.71 / 1.16 Watt
Load midlight 7.07 / 11.32 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
4500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
5000 mAh
Xiaomi 12 Pro
4600 mAh
Oppo Find X5 Pro
5000 mAh
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
4352 mAh
Average Samsung Exynos 2200
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-10%
-28%
-21%
-29%
-9%
-20%
-35%
Idle Minimum *
0.58
0.65
-12%
1.06
-83%
0.94
-62%
1.24
-114%
0.6
-3%
0.668 ?(0.58 - 0.71, n=4)
-15%
Idle Average *
0.71
1.06
-49%
1.19
-68%
1.24
-75%
1.39
-96%
1.5
-111%
1.038 ?(0.71 - 1.19, n=4)
-46%
Idle Maximum *
1.16
1.49
-28%
1.2
-3%
1.34
-16%
1.42
-22%
1.6
-38%
1.218 ?(1.16 - 1.26, n=4)
-5%
Load Average *
7.07
4.91
31%
6.46
9%
5.7
19%
3.58
49%
3.5
50%
9.43 ?(6.97 - 15.9, n=4)
-33%
Load Maximum *
11.32
10.29
9%
10.76
5%
8.12
28%
6.99
38%
4.8
58%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789101112131415Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Samsung Exynos 2200: Ø6.91 (0.893-15.5)
Oppo Find X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1: Ø5.27 (0.963-10.9)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011121314Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Samsung Exynos 2200; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.17 (6.42-14.4)
Oppo Find X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.58 (7.9-10.8)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Samsung Exynos 2200; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.625 (0.575-1.393)
Oppo Find X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.933 (0.856-1.058)

电池寿命

我们对电池寿命感到积极的惊讶,因为Galaxy S22 Ultra的电池寿命确实很好。我们还应该注意到,测试是在高QHD-Plus分辨率和自适应显示控制下进行的。

S22 Ultra能够超越其他Android 智能手机,特别是在调整显示亮度(150 cd/m²)的现实WLAN测试中。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
32h 53min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 98)
14h 04min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
17h 58min
Load (maximum brightness)
6h 50min
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
4500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
5000 mAh
Xiaomi 12 Pro
4600 mAh
Oppo Find X5 Pro
5000 mAh
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
4352 mAh
Battery Runtime
-22%
-13%
-13%
-12%
30%
Reader / Idle
1973
1223
-38%
1408
-29%
2036
3%
1269
-36%
2846
44%
H.264
1078
993
-8%
1310
22%
788
-27%
1142
6%
1522
41%
WiFi v1.3
844
644
-24%
702
-17%
766
-9%
788
-7%
1067
26%
Load
410
338
-18%
304
-26%
337
-18%
367
-10%
452
10%

Pros

+ 非常明亮和准确的显示
+ 5G、Wi-Fi 6E和eSIM
+ 将获得长期的更新
+ 包括S笔
+ IP68 认证
+ 良好的语音质量

Cons

- 存储不能扩展
- 缺少蓝牙的音频编解码器
- 目前,自适应显示仅在24-120赫兹之间
- 游戏性能弱
- 5GHz 无线局域网不是特别快

结论 - 三星仍有一些工作要做

测试三星Galaxy S22 Ultra。测试装置由德国三星公司提供。
测试三星Galaxy S22 Ultra。测试装置由德国三星公司提供。

通过Galaxy S22 Ultra,三星将Galaxy S和Galaxy Note系列的顶级机型整合到了一个设备中。这是一个很好的决定,Note系列的粉丝应该特别高兴,因为相机的妥协已经成为历史。尽管该智能手机是一个非常成功的产品,但它仍然患有一些儿童疾病。

当然,三星的SoC政策是有问题的。由于与AMD的合作以及三星围绕这一点制造的强大的骚动,人们对Exynos的期望很高。但不幸的是,新的Xclipse GPU看起来还不是真正的成品,所以玩家(仍然)不得不满足于在高端智能手机中减少细节和低帧率。虽然三星可能仍然会通过更新带来这方面的一些改进,但考虑到其高昂的价格,用户肯定应该能够在这里期待一个更成熟的产品。

对AMOLED显示屏刷新率的自适应控制也是如此。即使三星承诺在1到120赫兹之间,最低刷新率也要高得多,为24赫兹。因此,三星在这里也还有一些工作要做,特别是由于系统中继续存在一些卡顿,即使经过两次更新,直到现在也没有什么改善。

三星Galaxy S22 Ultra是一项强大的技术,竞争对手将不得不对其进行衡量,即使在开始时还不是一切运行顺利。

然而,我们仍然会推荐Galaxy S22 Ultra,因为我们提到的问题可能会通过更新得到解决,如此长的四、五年的更新期,否则只能在谷歌那里找到。此外,你可能会得到在智能手机中可以找到的最明亮和最准确的显示屏之一,强大的S Pen,最新的通信技术,伟大的语音质量,eSIM支持,三星Dex在这一点上甚至为Windows,UWB,甚至一个非常好的电池寿命。

一款支持笔的好的替代品也可以在以下产品中找到 摩托罗拉Edge 30 Pro.如果没有笔,但也有强大的性能和出色的相机,我们也应该提到 小米12 Pro或Find X5 Pro。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和可用性

虽然你可以直接从制造商的在线商店购买三星Galaxy S22 Ultra制造商的网上商店,或者也可以从其他供应商处购买,如亚马逊BestBuy起价为1,200美元。

Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G - 08/30/2022 v7 (old)
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
94%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
72 / 70 → 100%
Weight
88%
Battery
90%
Display
95%
Games Performance
56 / 64 → 88%
Application Performance
86 / 86 → 100%
Temperature
93%
Noise
100%
Audio
74 / 90 → 82%
Camera
81%
Average
84%
89%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 三星Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G评论 - 两款智能手机的融合体
Daniel Schmidt, 2022-03-29 (Update: 2024-11- 4)