三星Galaxy S24 FE 评测--粉丝重新定义了Galaxy 智能手机

Name: Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Brand: Samsung

降价卓越。

Galaxy S24 FE 比其姊妹机型Galaxy S24 和Galaxy S24 Plus 更大、更多彩、更便宜。在某些方面，三星手机可以与旗舰设备媲美，但在另一些方面却不尽人意。在我们的评测中，我们将澄清三星是否在正确的方面进行了调整。
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 11/12/2024 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Touchscreen Smartphone Galaxy S

三星Galaxy S24 FE 的评价：被粉丝评为中端产品

作为Galaxy 系列的附加设备，"粉丝版 "在 S 系列发布时会更有意义。大屏幕爱好者不必花那么多钱，只需在日常生活中采取更微妙的节约措施即可。我们认为，在 S24 FE 上，三星已经在正确的地方削减了成本，无论是最小化修改的 Exynos 芯片组、更少的频段还是指纹传感器中没有使用超声波技术。即使相机镜头远离主摄像头和 UFS 存储速度较慢，这些节约也没有预期的那么明显。

不过，我们怀疑Galaxy S 系列的粉丝们是否会喜欢Galaxy S24 FE 厚厚的边框和有点伤眼的屏幕闪烁。如果有人认为这些问题让人难以接受，那就应该仔细看看小米 14T Pro。

Test device courtesy of Samsung Germany

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

由于Galaxy S24 FE 上市后价格下降很快--不到 580 美元，已经处于中端价位--高零售价和上市晚意味着它很难找到与Galaxy S24 Plus 的相关性。不过，它仍然是一款诱人的Galaxy 智能手机，支持超长时间的更新、出色的主摄像头和众多高端功能，使其在这个新定义的价格区间内难以超越。

Pros

+ 高级外观

+ 长期更新

+ IP68 防护等级

+ 快速 SoC

+ 高级功能（无线充电、双 eSIM 卡......）

Cons

- 厚边框

- 低 PWM

- 与 Plus 型号相比较重

- 高散热导致节流

价格和供应情况

三星Galaxy S24 FE 的零售价为 649 美元，从 10 月初开始在亚马逊等在线商店或制造商自己的网站上销售。不过，在评测期间，市场价格已经比建议零售价低了约 100 美元。

可能的替代品比较

Image	Model / Review	Geizhals	Weight	Drive	Display
1. 85.7%	Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Samsung Exynos 2400e ⎘ Samsung Xclipse 940 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 128 GB	Bestpreis 519€ Gomibo.de 2. 535.99€ Mindfactory 3. 536€ PC-KING	213 g	128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.70" 2340x1080 385 PPI AMOLED
2. 84.8%	Xiaomi 14T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ ⎘ ARM Immortalis-G720 MP12 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 1024 GB	Bestpreis 772€ Schnaeppchen-Schuppen 2. 774.9€ SEelectronicseshop 3. 799€ alza.de	209 g	1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	6.67" 2712x1220 446 PPI AMOLED
3. 84.9%	Google Pixel 9 Google Tensor G4 ⎘ ARM Mali-G715 MP7 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 128 GB	Bestpreis 818.99€ PreiswertePC.de 2. 849€ nullprozentshop.de 3. 849€ Gomibo.de	198 g	128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.30" 2424x1080 421 PPI OLED
4. 90% ^{v7 (old)}	Samsung Galaxy S24 Samsung Exynos 2400 ⎘ Samsung Xclipse 940 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB	Bestpreis 599€ Coolblue 2. 614.8€ iconic777 3. 625€ mobilfunk-schreiber	167 g	256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6.20" 2340x1080 416 PPI Dynamic AMOLED 2X
5. 85.5% ^{v7 (old)}	Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Samsung Exynos 2200 ⎘ Samsung Xclipse 920 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 128 GB	Listenpreis 699€	209 g	128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.40" 2340x1080 403 PPI Dynamic AMOLED x2

三星Galaxy S24 FE 的评价：被粉丝评为中端产品
三星Galaxy S24 FE 规格
外壳 -Galaxy S24 FE 的防护等级为 IP
功能 -Galaxy S24 FE 具有快速 USB 3.2 存储功能
软件 - 长时间更新三星手机
通信和全球导航卫星系统 -Galaxy S24 FE 具有 5G 功能。
电话功能和语音质量 -Galaxy 电话具有双 SIM 卡功能。
摄像头 - 带有远视功能的三星智能手机
配件和保修 - 三星手机不带充电器
输入设备和操作 -Galaxy S24 FE 具有面部解锁功能
显示屏 -Galaxy S24 FE 采用动态 AMOLED 2X
性能 -Galaxy 手机配备自制 SoC
游戏 -Galaxy 手机适合玩游戏
发射 -Galaxy 手机配有立体声音效
电池续航时间 -Galaxy S24 FE 可以无线充电
Notebookcheck 总体评分

最年轻的成员 Galaxy S24 系列粉丝版，这款设备现在已经是第三代了第三代.Galaxy S24 FE 定位为 S24 的廉价替代品。 Galaxy S24和 Galaxy S24+尽管其尺寸更符合三星的 Plus 机型。FE 系列的基础机型仍然是 128 GB 存储容量，零售价为 649 美元，但三星只希望 256 GB 版本的机型多花 50 美元。请继续阅读，我们将为您揭秘三星在 Fan Edition 上削减成本以实现低价的秘诀。

三星Galaxy S24 FE 规格

Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (Galaxy S24 Series)

Processor

Samsung Exynos 2400e 10 x 2 - 3.1 GHz, Cortex-X4 / A720 / A520

Graphics adapter

Samsung Xclipse 940

Memory

8 GB

Display

6.70 inch 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 385 PPI, Capacitive Touchscreen, AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass Victus, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz

Storage

128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 128 GB

, 104 GB free

Connections

1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer, OTG, Miracast, eSIM

Networking

Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (850/900/1800/1900), 3G (B1/B2/B4/B5/B8), 4G (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B32/B38/B40/B41/B66), 5G (n1/n2/n3/n5/n7/n8/n12/n20/n25/n26/n28/n38/n40/n41/n66/n75/n77/n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8 x 162 x 77.3

Battery

4700 mAh Lithium-Ion

Charging

wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 14

Camera

Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.8, 24 mm, OIS, Videos @4320p/30fps) + 8 MPix (Tele, 3x optical zoom, f/2.4, 75mm, 1.0 µm) + 12 MPix (wide, f/2.2, 13 mm, 1.12 µm), camera2API: level 3
Secondary Camera: 10 MPix (FF, f/2.4, 26 mm)

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: OnScreen, USB cable, info material, OneUI 6, 24 Months Warranty, Widevine L1, SAR value: 0.857W/kg - Head, 1.29W/kg - Body, GNSS: GPS (L1/L5), GLONASS (L1), BeiDou (B1, B2), Galileo (E1/E5), fanless, waterproof

Weight

213 g

Links

Samsung notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

外壳 -Galaxy S24 FE 的防护等级为 IP

从视觉角度来看，FE 机型与Galaxy S24+ 几乎没有任何区别。不过，一个明显的区别是 6.7 英寸屏幕的边框较厚，这对屏占比产生了负面影响。在这方面，Galaxy S24 FE 的屏占比仅为 88%。三星手机通过了 IP68 防水认证。

除蓝色版本外，三星还提供黄色、黑色和绿色版本。不过，与Galaxy S24 系列相比，三星选择了能神奇地吸附指纹的亮面设计。相比之下，该机的外观和做工都达到了高端智能手机的品质。正面和背面的大猩猩玻璃也给人以高档的感觉。不过，FE 机型的重量为 213 克，明显比 Galaxy S24+电池容量较小。

尺寸比较

Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Xiaomi 14T Pro Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Google Pixel 9 Samsung Galaxy S24 DIN A6 ❌

功能 -Galaxy S24 FE 具有快速 USB 3.2 存储功能

Galaxy S24 FE 提供蓝牙 5.3、USB OTG、NFC、Miracast 和 Samsung DeX 等丰富的功能，但缺少旗舰产品中的超宽带芯片。不过，它配备了三星 Knox 安全平台。FE 机型还配备了快速 USB 标准（3.2 Gen.1），支持将有线图像输出到 HDMI 或 DisplayPort 接口。在我们使用三星 980 Pro（M2.SSD 硬盘）进行的拷贝测试中，USB 端口的传输速度高达 359 MB/s。连接的存储介质可格式化为 NTFS（只读）或 exFAT。

软件 - 长时间更新三星手机

风扇版的软件也毫不逊色。Galaxy S24 FE 搭载了Android 14 以及带有Galaxy AI 的内部用户界面 OneUI 6.1。制造商承诺提供与 S24 Ultra 相同的 7 年操作系统和安全更新。 Galaxy S24 Ultra.据三星称，安全补丁将每月推出一次，但具体时间尚不清楚。在审查时，Android 安全补丁是从 2024 年 10 月开始的，因此非常及时。

三星Galaxy S24 FE 可以使用目前所有的Galaxy AI 功能，如 Circle to Search 或实时翻译，以及三星的生成式照片和视频编辑功能。

可持续性

据制造商称，三星智能手机由各种回收材料制成的部件组成，包括再利用塑料、铝、玻璃材料和稀土。包装由 100% 的再生纸制成。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 -Galaxy S24 FE 具有 5G 功能。

Galaxy S24 FE 支持接入快速的 5G 移动网络。在德语地区使用该设备时，三星智能手机也不存在 4G 连接问题。不过，LTE 频段的覆盖范围比 Galaxy S24.
这款高端手机可能无法在家庭 Wi-Fi 网络中提供 WiFi 7，但由于它支持 6 GHz，因此在使用我们的参考路由器（华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000）时仍能达到超过 1,800 MBit/s 的高速传输。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Xiaomi 14T Pro Wi-Fi 7	986 (498^min - 1013^max) MBit/s +1%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Wi-Fi 6E	976 (493^min - 998^max) MBit/s
Average Wi-Fi 6E (227 - 1810, n=54)	962 MBit/s -1%
Google Pixel 9 Wi-Fi 7	955 (739^min - 994^max) MBit/s -2%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Wi-Fi 6E	913 (688^min - 994^max) MBit/s -6%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Wi-Fi 6E	822 (789^min - 857^max) MBit/s -16%
Average of class Smartphone (40.5 - 1810, n=187, last 2 years)	730 MBit/s -25%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Average Wi-Fi 6E (442 - 1787, n=54)	952 MBit/s +32%
Xiaomi 14T Pro Wi-Fi 7	931 (471^min - 969^max) MBit/s +29%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Wi-Fi 6E	914 (461^min - 932^max) MBit/s +26%
Google Pixel 9 Wi-Fi 7	911 (857^min - 930^max) MBit/s +26%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Wi-Fi 6E	774 (699^min - 820^max) MBit/s +7%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Wi-Fi 6E	723 (680^min - 801^max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone (34.8 - 1875, n=185, last 2 years)	713 MBit/s -1%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Xiaomi 14T Pro Wi-Fi 7	1894 (956^min - 1933^max) MBit/s +3%
Google Pixel 9 Wi-Fi 7	1855 (1826^min - 1894^max) MBit/s +1%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Wi-Fi 6E	1844 (1768^min - 1895^max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Wi-Fi 6E	1588 (1465^min - 1658^max) MBit/s -14%
Average of class Smartphone (229 - 1902, n=77, last 2 years)	1445 MBit/s -22%
Average Wi-Fi 6E (229 - 1845, n=56)	1426 MBit/s -23%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Google Pixel 9 Wi-Fi 7	1851 (886^min - 1889^max) MBit/s +22%
Xiaomi 14T Pro Wi-Fi 7	1695 (1643^min - 1720^max) MBit/s +12%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Wi-Fi 6E	1513 (1431^min - 1564^max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Wi-Fi 6E	1446 (1398^min - 1497^max) MBit/s -4%
Average of class Smartphone (668 - 1864, n=77, last 2 years)	1373 MBit/s -9%
Average Wi-Fi 6E (598 - 1844, n=56)	1335 MBit/s -12%

Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1844 (1768-1895)

Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1588 (1465-1658)

Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1511 (1431-1564)

Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1444 (1398-1497)

Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø960 (493-998)

Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø822 (789-857)

Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø722 (680-801)

Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø897 (461-932)

与我们的对比设备（Garmin Venu 2）相比，S24 FE 的定位功能令人印象深刻，不过，我们记录到的一些测量结果虽然很小，但却明显不准确。使用Galaxy S24 FE，我们测量到的数据与已行驶路线的偏差很小，这部分归功于双频全球导航卫星系统。

电话功能和语音质量 -Galaxy 电话具有双 SIM 卡功能。

Galaxy S24 FE 的语音质量非常好。声音再现清晰，环境噪音也被明显过滤掉了。这款三星手机支持 VoLTE 或 Wi-Fi 通话等常用功能，还支持Galaxy AI。如果需要，后者可以在没有数据连接的情况下通过三星电话应用程序实时翻译通话内容。除了两个 eSIM 卡，您还可以使用两张实体卡来实现双 SIM 卡功能。当然，也可以将两种功能结合起来使用。

摄像头 - 带有远视功能的三星智能手机

除了分辨率低于 S24Galaxy S24 FE 的前置摄像头只有一个固定焦距。不过，后置摄像头采用了与 S24 系列相同的光学防抖、5000 万像素分辨率的主摄像头。 S24 系列.在日光下，它所使用的 ISOCELL GN3 可拍摄出动态范围良好的精美照片。1/1.56 英寸的相机传感器只有在光线变暗时才会开始产生明显的柔焦效果。Galaxy S24 FE 在色彩还原方面也令人印象深刻。

主摄像头配有一个 1200 万像素的超广角镜头，但使用的 1/3.2 英寸传感器比Galaxy S24 中的小。尽管如此，在光线条件良好的情况下，照片质量还是不错的。在变焦拍摄时，差异也相对较小。Galaxy S24 FE 可拍摄分辨率稍低的 800 万像素图像，但风扇版可提供无损 3 倍变焦，传感器尺寸与Galaxy S24 相似。此外，还提供最大 30 倍的数码变焦。Galaxy S24 FE 的照片在最高 10 倍变焦时绝对可以接受。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Wide angle Wide-angle Low light Ultra-wide-angle Zoom 5x

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy S24 FE

OnePlus 12

Apple iPhone 16

Canon EOS 90D

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy S24 FE

OnePlus 12

Apple iPhone 16

Canon EOS 90D

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy S24 FE

OnePlus 12

Apple iPhone 16

Canon EOS 90D

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy S24 FE

OnePlus 12

Apple iPhone 16

Canon EOS 90D

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy S24 FE

OnePlus 12

Apple iPhone 16

Canon EOS 90D

ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy S24 FE: 5.11 ∆E min: 0.56 - max: 10.29 ∆E

配件和保修 - 三星手机不带充电器

包装盒内没有充电器或保护套。包装内只有一条数据线或充电线（USB-C 至 USB-C）和一张 SIM 卡。不过，三星提供了大量可选的保护套。

在德国，三星为其 FE 机型提供 24 个月的保修服务。您还可以为自己的Galaxy 手机购买长达两年的 Care+ 保险套餐。根据所选套餐的不同，价格约为 69 美元和 179 美元。

输入设备和操作 -Galaxy S24 FE 具有面部解锁功能

Galaxy S24 FE 的电容式触摸屏反应毫无延迟，由于采用了 120 Hz 的面板，动画效果非常流畅。负责振动（X 轴）的线性电机可提供清晰的触觉反馈。

生物识别安全可通过前置 2D 摄像头或集成在 OLED 面板中的光学指纹传感器实现。在日常使用中，这两种方式都能非常可靠地工作，尽管面部解锁功能很不安全。

显示屏 -Galaxy S24 FE 采用动态 AMOLED 2X

OLED 显示屏采用 RG/BG 子像素矩阵，由一个红色、一个蓝色和一个绿色发光二极管组成。

Galaxy S24 FE 的 1080p AMOLED 面板屏幕对角线为 6.7 英寸，刷新率可选 60 Hz 或 120 Hz。在播放 HDR 内容时，我们达到了（2,168 cd/m²）的峰值亮度，而在实际的 APL18 测试中，1,984 cd/m² 的高亮度也给我们留下了深刻的印象。

遗憾的是，三星并没有为风扇版提供对眼睛友好的 PWM 调光功能。由于其内置 OLED 技术，Galaxy S24 FE 使用低频 PWM 来控制屏幕亮度。我们用示波器测得的频率较低，但稳定在 240 Hz。


1214 cd/m²	1216 cd/m²	1219 cd/m²
1210 cd/m²	1211 cd/m²	1215 cd/m²
1220 cd/m²	1220 cd/m²	1204 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 1220 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1214.3 cd/m² Minimum: 1.63 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 99 %
Center on Battery: 1211 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.13

	Samsung Galaxy S24 FE AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.7"	Xiaomi 14T Pro AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"	Google Pixel 9 OLED, 2424x1080, 6.3"	Samsung Galaxy S24 Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 2340x1080, 6.2"	Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Dynamic AMOLED x2, 2340x1080, 6.4"
Screen		9%	33%	-42%	-22%
Brightness middle	1211	953 -21%	2063 70%	1349 11%	897 -26%
Brightness	1214	961 -21%	1914 58%	1369 13%	908 -25%
Brightness Distribution	99	95 -4%	84 -15%	97 -2%	97 -2%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.6	0.9 44%	0.7 56%	3.3 -106%	2.2 -38%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	2.4	1.5 37%	2.2 8%	5 -108%	3.1 -29%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.5	1.2 20%	1.2 20%	2.4 -60%	1.7 -13%
Gamma	2.13 ^103%	2.22 ^99%	2.23 ^99%	1.97 ^112%	2.08 ^106%
CCT	6456 ^101%	6580 ^99%	6524 ^100%	6635 ^98%	6617 ^98%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

120 Hz
Amplitude: 15.47 %
Secondary Frequency: 240 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

以固定变焦级别和不同亮度设置进行的一系列测量（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平，但这是缩放造成的。最小亮度下的振幅放大图可以在信息框中看到）。

我们利用光光谱仪和 Calman 软件进行的分析表明，在受控的 sRGB 色彩空间中，AMOLED 面板的平均 Delta-E 偏差非常低。除了两个色彩配置文件外，白平衡也可以在设置菜单中单独调整。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
1.42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.7355 ms rise
1.42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.683 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
3.35 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 1.586 ms rise
3.35 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 1.764 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Galaxy S24 FE 在户外给人留下了非常好的印象。三星的亮度储备足以应对秋季的光线环境。不过，由于亮度高，即使在夏天，玻璃表面的反光也不会令人讨厌。OLED 屏幕还具有良好的视角稳定性。

性能 -Galaxy 手机配备自制 SoC

三星为Galaxy S24 FE 配备了 Exynos 2400e的时钟频率略低于 Exynos 2400.不过，这只影响到 Cortex X4 性能核心，在 FE 机型中，它的主频只有 3.1 GHz，而不是最高的 3.2 GHz。尽管如此，在日常工作中也不会明显感觉到差异。与 Galaxy S24类似，Fan Edition 使用 8 GB 内存。在基准测试中，Exynos 2400e 的性能表现非常出色，正如预期的那样，与 Exynos 2400 相比没有明显差异。

Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Xiaomi 14T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288	2187 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Samsung Exynos 2400e, Xclipse 940, 8192	2066 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 2400e ()	2066 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192	2045 Points -1%
Google Pixel 9 Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288	1798 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	1601 Points -23%
Average of class Smartphone (193 - 3479, n=162, last 2 years)	1454 Points -30%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi 14T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288	6972 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192	6456 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Samsung Exynos 2400e, Xclipse 940, 8192	6341 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 2400e ()	6341 Points 0%
Google Pixel 9 Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288	4501 Points -29%
Average of class Smartphone (845 - 10401, n=162, last 2 years)	4049 Points -36%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	3938 Points -38%

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Xiaomi 14T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288	1598 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Samsung Exynos 2400e, Xclipse 940, 8192	1581 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 2400e ()	1581 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192	1553 Points -2%
Google Pixel 9 Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288	1423 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	1161 Points -27%
Average of class Smartphone (126 - 2437, n=172, last 2 years)	995 Points -37%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi 14T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288	6478 Points +15%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Samsung Exynos 2400e, Xclipse 940, 8192	5622 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 2400e ()	5622 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192	5561 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	3768 Points -33%
Google Pixel 9 Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288	3563 Points -37%
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 6687, n=172, last 2 years)	3312 Points -41%

Antutu v10 - Total Score
Xiaomi 14T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288	2088406 Points +38%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192	1616403 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Samsung Exynos 2400e, Xclipse 940, 8192	1516996 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 2400e ()	1516996 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (142748 - 3015111, n=98, last 2 years)	1232320 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	1124908 Points -26%
Google Pixel 9 Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288	1022007 Points -33%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy S24 Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192	17763 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Samsung Exynos 2400e, Xclipse 940, 8192	17338 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 2400e ()	17338 Points 0%
Xiaomi 14T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288	16053 Points -7%
Google Pixel 9 Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288	13948 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	13573 Points -22%
Average of class Smartphone (4609 - 24088, n=191, last 2 years)	12972 Points -25%

CrossMark - Overall
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Samsung Exynos 2400e, Xclipse 940, 8192	1263 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 2400e ()	1263 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192	1256 Points -1%
Xiaomi 14T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288	956 Points -24%
Google Pixel 9 Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288	951 Points -25%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	888 Points -30%
Average of class Smartphone (187 - 1517, n=158, last 2 years)	885 Points -30%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Xiaomi 14T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288	11976 Points +36%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192	9287 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Samsung Exynos 2400e, Xclipse 940, 8192	8827 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 2400e ()	8827 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	7179 Points -19%
Google Pixel 9 Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288	6894 Points -22%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11976, n=152, last 2 years)	6326 Points -28%
System
Xiaomi 14T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288	15367 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Samsung Exynos 2400e, Xclipse 940, 8192	14627 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 2400e ()	14627 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192	14406 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	11081 Points -24%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=152, last 2 years)	10181 Points -30%
Google Pixel 9 Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288	7593 Points -48%
Memory
Xiaomi 14T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288	11254 Points +25%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192	10193 Points +13%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Samsung Exynos 2400e, Xclipse 940, 8192	9036 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 2400e ()	9036 Points 0%
Google Pixel 9 Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288	8573 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	7614 Points -16%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=152, last 2 years)	6785 Points -25%
Graphics
Xiaomi 14T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288	58323 Points +150%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192	26783 Points +15%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Samsung Exynos 2400e, Xclipse 940, 8192	23338 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 2400e ()	23338 Points 0%
Google Pixel 9 Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288	20938 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	17941 Points -23%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=152, last 2 years)	17165 Points -26%
Web
Xiaomi 14T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288	2037 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Samsung Exynos 2400e, Xclipse 940, 8192	1982 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 2400e ()	1982 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192	1908 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	1755 Points -11%
Google Pixel 9 Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288	1648 Points -17%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2145, n=152, last 2 years)	1566 Points -21%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Xiaomi 14T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288	55033 Points +369%
Google Pixel 9 Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288	35227 Points +200%
Average of class Smartphone (1267 - 74958, n=143, last 2 years)	16841 Points +43%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Samsung Exynos 2400e, Xclipse 940, 8192	11738 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 2400e ()	11738 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192	11574 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	10374 Points -12%

AImark - Score v3.x
Xiaomi 14T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288	43121 Points +3576%
Average of class Smartphone (82 - 307528, n=135, last 2 years)	25873 Points +2106%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Samsung Exynos 2400e, Xclipse 940, 8192	1173 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 2400e ()	1173 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192	1134 Points -3%
Google Pixel 9 Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288	871 Points -26%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	0 Points -100%

Geekbench AI
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI
Xiaomi 14T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288	976 Points +216%
Average of class Smartphone (191 - 4619, n=33, last 2 years)	862 Points +179%
Google Pixel 9 Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288	771 Points +150%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Samsung Exynos 2400e, Xclipse 940, 8192	309 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 2400e ()	309 Points 0%
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI
Google Pixel 9 Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288	4666 Points +1327%
Average of class Smartphone (192 - 32432, n=33, last 2 years)	4301 Points +1215%
Xiaomi 14T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288	4189 Points +1181%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Samsung Exynos 2400e, Xclipse 940, 8192	327 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 2400e ()	327 Points 0%
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI
Google Pixel 9 Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288	6451 Points +501%
Average of class Smartphone (118 - 44657, n=33, last 2 years)	6109 Points +469%
Xiaomi 14T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288	3975 Points +270%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Samsung Exynos 2400e, Xclipse 940, 8192	1073 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 2400e ()	1073 Points 0%

在Galaxy S24 FE 中，图形计算由集成的 Xclipse 940 iGPU中的 Exynos 2400e取得了非常出色的成绩。A Galaxy S24在 GFXBench 中的表现略好，而 FE 机型在 3DMark 中的表现略好。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4378 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24 Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3933 Points -10%
Xiaomi 14T Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	3866 Points -12%
Google Pixel 9 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2601 Points -41%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1702 Points -61%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4329 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24 Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3902 Points -10%
Xiaomi 14T Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	3808 Points -12%
Google Pixel 9 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2567 Points -41%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1702 Points -61%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	13847 Points
Xiaomi 14T Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	13588 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	12652 Points -9%
Google Pixel 9 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8998 Points -35%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6440 Points -53%

3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7948 Points
Xiaomi 14T Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	6984 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6649 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3589 Points -55%
Google Pixel 9 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%

3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7894 Points
Xiaomi 14T Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	6932 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6673 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3631 Points -54%

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1803 Points
Xiaomi 14T Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	1499 Points -17%
Google Pixel 9 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1023 Points -43%

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1821 Points
Xiaomi 14T Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	1565 Points -14%
Google Pixel 9 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1083 Points -41%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Google Pixel 9 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps
Xiaomi 14T Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	119 fps -1%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	119 fps -1%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi 14T Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	738 fps +92%
Google Pixel 9 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	419 fps +9%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	403 fps +5%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	384 fps
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	218 fps -43%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Google Pixel 9 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps
Xiaomi 14T Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	119 fps -1%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	112 fps -7%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi 14T Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	478 fps +78%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	289 fps +7%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	269 fps
Google Pixel 9 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	257 fps -4%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	135 fps -50%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S24 Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps
Xiaomi 14T Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Google Pixel 9 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	119 fps -1%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	89 fps -26%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi 14T Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	269 fps +25%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	215 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24 Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	214 fps 0%
Google Pixel 9 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	167 fps -22%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	101 fps -53%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi 14T Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	108 fps +5%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	105 fps +2%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	103 fps
Google Pixel 9 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	75 fps -27%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	56 fps -46%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi 14T Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	144 fps +11%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	131 fps +1%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	130 fps
Google Pixel 9 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	80 fps -38%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	63 fps -52%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S24 Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	105 fps +5%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	100 fps
Xiaomi 14T Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	91 fps -9%
Google Pixel 9 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	66 fps -34%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	42 fps -58%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	89 fps
Xiaomi 14T Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	75 fps -16%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	69 fps -22%
Google Pixel 9 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	40 fps -55%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	28 fps -69%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi 14T Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	119 fps +2%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	118 fps +1%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	117 fps
Google Pixel 9 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	100 fps -15%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	62 fps -47%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 14T Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	187 fps +21%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	154 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24 Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	153 fps -1%
Google Pixel 9 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	108 fps -30%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	77 fps -50%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 14T Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	34 fps +13%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	32 fps +7%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	30 fps
Google Pixel 9 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	19 fps -37%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	12 fps -60%

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average Samsung Exynos 2400e ()	182.4 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (Chrome 130)	182.387 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Chrome 122)	128.638 Points -29%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=161, last 2 years)	120.4 Points -34%
Google Pixel 9 (Chrome 129)	107.467 Points -41%
Xiaomi 14T Pro (Chrome 129)	77.674 Points -57%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Chrome 121)	13.847 Points -92%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (Chrome 130)	298 runs/min
Average Samsung Exynos 2400e ()	298 runs/min 0%
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Chrome 122)	267 runs/min -10%
Google Pixel 9 (Chrome 129)	185 runs/min -38%
Xiaomi 14T Pro (Chrome 129)	138 runs/min -54%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Chrome 121)	137 runs/min -54%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=147, last 2 years)	136.5 runs/min -54%

Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (Chrome 130)	16 runs/min
Average Samsung Exynos 2400e ()	16 runs/min 0%
Google Pixel 9 (Chrome 129)	14.9 runs/min -7%
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 34, n=58, last 2 years)	10.7 runs/min -33%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Chrome 122)	8.98 runs/min -44%
Xiaomi 14T Pro (Chrome 129)	6.55 runs/min -59%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (Chrome 130)	187 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 2400e ()	187 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Chrome 122)	176 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Chrome 121)	130 Points -30%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=152, last 2 years)	113.8 Points -39%
Google Pixel 9 (Chrome 129)	103 Points -45%
Xiaomi 14T Pro (Chrome 129)	78 Points -58%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (Chrome 130)	64838 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 2400e ()	64838 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Chrome 122)	63748 Points -2%
Google Pixel 9	56737 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Chrome 121)	51202 Points -21%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years)	37161 Points -43%
Xiaomi 14T Pro (Chrome 129)	25646 Points -60%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Xiaomi 14T Pro (Chrome 129)	2123.5 ms * -255%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years)	1568 ms * -162%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Chrome 121)	840.3 ms * -40%
Google Pixel 9 (Chrome 129)	744.57 ms * -24%
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Chrome 122)	662.3 ms * -11%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (Chrome 130)	598.12 ms *
Average Samsung Exynos 2400e ()	598 ms * -0%

* ... smaller is better

	Samsung Galaxy S24 FE	Xiaomi 14T Pro	Google Pixel 9	Samsung Galaxy S24	Samsung Galaxy S23 FE	Average 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		289%	3%	73%	45%	20%	66%
Sequential Read 256KB	1783.43	3687.54 107%	1584.56 -11%	3701.23 108%	1657.44 -7%	1600 ?(1030 - 3134, n=59) -10%	1847 ?(226 - 4512, n=193, last 2 years) 4%
Sequential Write 256KB	631.23	3908.34 519%	256.48 -59%	1435.39 127%	994.67 58%	756 ?(233 - 1332, n=59) 20%	1436 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=193, last 2 years) 127%
Random Read 4KB	312.98	441.21 41%	226.41 -28%	373.12 19%	322.32 3%	244 ?(126.2 - 428, n=59) -22%	277 ?(22.2 - 483, n=193, last 2 years) -11%
Random Write 4KB	127.53	752.87 490%	266.19 109%	175.98 38%	288.23 126%	243 ?(121.4 - 503, n=59) 91%	308 ?(9.4 - 753, n=193, last 2 years) 142%

游戏 -Galaxy 手机适合玩游戏

我们对内置的 Xclipse 940 iGPU使用GameBench 应用程序进行高帧率游戏的相关测试。.对系统要求不高的游戏，如第一人称射击游戏《死亡扳机 2》（Dead Trigger 2），可以在Galaxy S24 FE 上以中等设置、120 帧/秒的速度运行。要求较高的游戏，如《PUBG Mobile》，只能在最低图形设置下以 90 帧/秒的高帧率运行。Galaxy 手机可以在最高图形设置下以 60 fps 的速度玩我们的第三款游戏《源氏冲击》。

Samsung Galaxy S24 FE; Dead Trigger 2: Ø118.7 (105-120)

Samsung Galaxy S24 FE; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø56.7 (34-60)

Samsung Galaxy S24 FE; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø39.6 (27-41)

Samsung Galaxy S24 FE; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø81.1 (58-91)

Samsung Galaxy S24 FE; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps: Ø47.3 (36-60)

Samsung Galaxy S24 FE; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps: Ø57.7 (48-60)

发射 -Galaxy 手机配有立体声音效

温度

在持续负载下，表面温度非常明显。我们测得的峰值接近 50 °C。这在 3DMark 压力测试中也有所体现。Galaxy S24 FE 的性能并不特别稳定。

Max. Load

Idle


49.2 °C	48.8 °C	45.2 °C
49.5 °C	47.5 °C	43 °C
49.7 °C	48.2 °C	42.5 °C

Maximum: 49.7 °C
Average: 47.1 °C


42.6 °C	45.7 °C	48.9 °C
41.7 °C	49.4 °C	49.9 °C
40.2 °C	43.7 °C	49.1 °C

Maximum: 49.9 °C
Average: 45.7 °C

Room Temperature 21.4 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 47.1 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49.7 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49.9 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.8 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad stress test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy S24 Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	75.5 % +13%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	69.9 % +4%
Google Pixel 9 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	68.5 % +2%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	67.1 %
Xiaomi 14T Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	59 % -12%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	73.5 % +17%
Google Pixel 9 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	71.3 % +14%
Xiaomi 14T Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	69 % +10%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	62.8 %
Samsung Galaxy S24 Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	57 % -9%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi 14T Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	69.6 % +10%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	69 % +9%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	63.4 %
Samsung Galaxy S24 Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	57.9 % -9%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi 14T Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	79.3 % +34%
Google Pixel 9 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	78.5 % +33%
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	59.2 %

Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø16.4 (14.5-23.1)

Xiaomi 14T Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø21.6 (19.7-28.5)

Google Pixel 9 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø13.2 (10.9-15.3)

Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø56.6 (49.7-74.1)

Xiaomi 14T Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø72 (59.8-101.2)

Google Pixel 9 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø46.2 (36.3-53.1)

Xiaomi 14T Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø77.4 (68.6-80.7)

Google Pixel 9 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø52.2 (45.1-55.7)

Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø19.6 (17.2-25.5)

Xiaomi 14T Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø19.7 (15.2-22.4)

Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø20.8 (17.3-27.2)

Xiaomi 14T Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø19.6 (15.1-21.6)

Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400e, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø9.73 (8.08-13.6)

Xiaomi 14T Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø10 (9.2-11.6)

Google Pixel 9 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø6.79 (5.95-7.59)

发言人

在我们的测试中，声音悦耳的立体声扬声器表现出线性的中音和一丝低音。高音也出现在声场中，但在粉红噪声测量中明显下降。此外，还可通过 USB 端口或蓝牙无线连接耳机。有多种音频编解码器可供选择。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Samsung Galaxy S24 FE audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 30% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S23 FE audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池续航时间 -Galaxy S24 FE 可以无线充电

耗电量

快速充电并非三星旗舰产品的强项，FE 机型也是如此。Galaxy 手机在使用有线连接时最多只能提供 25 瓦的功率，但 4700 毫安时的电池也可以通过无线方式充电。在测试中，我们使用小米移动电源 25000 充电时间约为 80 分钟。

从我们的测量结果来看，Galaxy S24 FE 的效率并不是特别高，尤其是在空闲运行时，但总体而言，耗电量并不突出。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.03 / 0.13 Watt
Idle	0.78 / 1.31 / 1.36 Watt
Load	13.23 / 16.23 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Samsung Galaxy S24 FE 4700 mAh	Xiaomi 14T Pro 5000 mAh	Google Pixel 9 4700 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S24 4000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S23 FE 4500 mAh	Average Samsung Exynos 2400e	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		12%	2%	15%	2%	0%	9%
Idle Minimum *	0.78	0.95 -22%	0.66 15%	0.42 46%	0.69 12%	0.78 ?() -0%	0.895 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=153, last 2 years) -15%
Idle Average *	1.31	1.2 8%	1.49 -14%	0.93 29%	1.15 12%	1.31 ?() -0%	1.453 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=153, last 2 years) -11%
Idle Maximum *	1.36	1.27 7%	1.78 -31%	1.07 21%	1.26 7%	1.36 ?() -0%	1.613 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=153, last 2 years) -19%
Load Average *	13.23	5.95 55%	7.44 44%	15.43 -17%	15.93 -20%	13.2 ?() -0%	6.5 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=148, last 2 years) 51%
Load Maximum *	16.23	14.02 14%	16.64 -3%	16.51 -2%	16.09 1%	16.2 ?() -0%	9.86 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=148, last 2 years) 39%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Samsung Exynos 2400e; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø8.2 (0.989-16.4)

Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Samsung Exynos 2200; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.24 (0.961-14.4)

Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Samsung Exynos 2400e; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.015 (0.979-1.652)

Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Samsung Exynos 2200; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.913 (0.859-1.222)

Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Samsung Exynos 2400e; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø11 (9.75-15.3)

Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Samsung Exynos 2200; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø12.6 (11.7-13.4)

Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Samsung Exynos 2400e; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.015 (0.979-1.652)

Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Samsung Exynos 2200; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.913 (0.859-1.222)

电池寿命

在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试中，Galaxy S24 FE 在实际条件下表现出了稳定的运行时间和 150 cd/m² 的显示亮度。不过，与 Plus 机型相比，电池续航时间明显减少，仅为 12.5 小时。

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing		12h 29min

Battery Runtime - WiFi v1.3
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE 4700 mAh	749 min
Xiaomi 14T Pro 5000 mAh	1123 min
Google Pixel 9 4700 mAh	990 min
Samsung Galaxy S24 4000 mAh	880 min
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE 4500 mAh	815 min

Notebookcheck 总体评分

由于发布时间较晚且零售价较高，三星为其 "粉丝版 "制造了不少麻烦。不过，作为Galaxy S 系列推出的第四款机型，FE 机型当然有其存在的理由。

Back to the verdict

Samsung Galaxy S24 FE - 11/08/2024 v8
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis

89%

Keyboard

67 / 75 → 89%

Pointing Device

94%

Connectivity

66 / 69 → 96%

Weight

88%

Battery

89%

Display

92%

Games Performance

37 / 55 → 68%

Application Performance

73 / 85 → 85%

AI Performance

25%

Temperature

81%

Noise

100%

Audio

77 / 90 → 85%

Camera

81%

Average

73%

86%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
60%

Packaging
90%

Power Use
97.9%

Repairability
60%

Software Updates
100%

Total Sustainability Score: 68%

三星Galaxy S24 FE 评测--粉丝重新定义了Galaxy 智能手机

降价卓越。

三星Galaxy S24 FE 的评价：被粉丝评为中端产品

Pros

Cons

价格和供应情况

可能的替代品比较

Table of Contents

三星Galaxy S24 FE 规格

外壳 -Galaxy S24 FE 的防护等级为 IP

尺寸比较

功能 -Galaxy S24 FE 具有快速 USB 3.2 存储功能

软件 - 长时间更新三星手机

可持续性

通信和全球导航卫星系统 -Galaxy S24 FE 具有 5G 功能。

电话功能和语音质量 -Galaxy 电话具有双 SIM 卡功能。

摄像头 - 带有远视功能的三星智能手机

配件和保修 - 三星手机不带充电器

输入设备和操作 -Galaxy S24 FE 具有面部解锁功能

显示屏 -Galaxy S24 FE 采用动态 AMOLED 2X

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

性能 -Galaxy 手机配备自制 SoC

游戏 -Galaxy 手机适合玩游戏

发射 -Galaxy 手机配有立体声音效

温度

3DMark Steel Nomad stress test

发言人

Samsung Galaxy S24 FE audio analysis

Samsung Galaxy S23 FE audio analysis

电池续航时间 -Galaxy S24 FE 可以无线充电

耗电量

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

电池寿命

Notebookcheck 总体评分

More articles related to this device

Transparency