Notebookcheck Logo

三星Galaxy S24 Ultra 评测：终极智能手机变身人工智能智能手机

都只是软件？

在我们的测试中，三星Galaxy S24 Ultra 不仅以其出色的硬件给人留下了深刻印象，尤其是其全新的人工智能功能，能为日常生活带来真正的附加值。不过，硬件方面也发生了很大变化。
5G Android Galaxy S Smartphone Touchscreen

三星Galaxy S24 Ultra 是Galaxy S23 Ultra 的直接继承者。从外观上看，它与前代产品非常相似，但也有一些细微的差别。在新一代产品中，三星首次使用钛合金作为边框，并采用了之前独有的康宁大猩猩铠甲玻璃。另一个独家特色是 SoC，当然是 Galaxy 。摄像头也采用了新的潜望式变焦，但其他传感器保持不变。

Galaxy S24 Ultra 的起价为 1300 美元，因此比上一代贵了 100 美元，但也提供了更大的 RAM。三星提供三种配置：

配置 价格 (RRP)
12/256 GB 1299.99 美元
12/512 GB 1419.99 美元
12/1024 GB 1659.99 美元

1 TB 版本只能从三星购买。

Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (Galaxy S24 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy 8 x 2.3 - 3.4 GHz, Cortex-X4 / A720 / A720 / A520 (Kryo)
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 750
Memory
12 GB 
, LPDDR5x
Display
6.80 inch 19.5:9, 3120 x 1440 pixel 505 PPI, capacitive, native pen support, Dynamic AMOLED 2X, LTPO 1 - 120 Hz, Corning Gorilla Armor, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 256 GB 
, 256 / 512 / 1024 GB, 230.6 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, Barometer, Gyro Sensor, Geomagnetic Sensor, Hall Sensor, Proximity Sensor, UWB, OTG
Networking
Wi-Fi 7 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 8), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.6 x 162.3 x 79
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 14
Camera
Primary Camera: 200 MPix (Samsung HP2, f/1.7, 23 mm, 1/1.3", Super QPD, FOV 85°, 0.6 µm, OIS) + 12 MPix (Ultra wide, IMX564, 1/2.55", 13 mm, Dual Pixel AF, FOV 120°, f/2.2, 1.4 µm) + 10 MPix (3x opt. Zoom, 69 mm, IMX754, 1/3.52", Dual Pixel AF, f/2.4, FOV 36˚, 1.12 µm, OIS) + 50 MPix (IMX854, 1/2.52", 5x Periscope, OIS, f/3.4, FOV 22˚); Camera2-API-Level: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 12 MPix (f/2.2, AF, 25 mm)
Additional features
Speakers: Dual, Keyboard: Onscreen, SIM-Needle, USB-Cabel, One UI, 24 Months Warranty, IP68, DRM Widevine L1; GNSS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (L1), BeiDou (B1, B2a, B1C), Galileo (E1, E5a), QZSS; Bluetooth Audio Codecs: SBC, AAC, aptX, LDAC, SSC; Body-SAR: 1.30 W/kg, Head-SAR: 1.056 W/kg, fanless, waterproof
Weight
232 g
Price
1449 Euro
Amazon
Links
Samsung notebook section
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
91.1 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2024
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750		232 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.80"3120x1440
89.4 %
v7 (old)
01 / 2024
Xiaomi 14 Pro
SD 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750		223 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.73"3200x1440
91.1 %
v7 (old)
12 / 2023
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU		221 g256 GB NVMe6.70"2796x1290
90.1 %
v7 (old)
07 / 2023
Honor Magic5 Pro
SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740		219 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.81"2848x1312
89.9 %
v7 (old)
06 / 2023
Sony Xperia 1 V
SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740		187 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.50"3840x1644
89.4 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2023
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740		199 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.67"2400x1080
89 %
v7 (old)
12 / 2023
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7		213 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"2992x1344

保护壳 - 适用于Galaxy S24 Ultra 的钛金属和大猩猩装甲玻璃保护壳

Galaxy S24 Ultra 有灰色、黑色和黄色三种颜色。
三种颜色选择

三星Galaxy S24 Ultra 首次采用了钛合金边框，但这对重量的影响并不大，因为它只比上一代产品轻了 1 克。三星规定机身高度为 8.6 毫米，我们的测量结果也证实了这一点。小的相机镜头突出 1.2 毫米，大的突出 2.15 毫米。例如，如果将 S24 Ultra 放在桌子上，它就会非常晃动。
。

所有钛金属镜架都采用亚光表面处理，但也会根据所选颜色的不同而呈现不同的色彩。今年有四种颜色可供选择： 钛灰、钛黑、钛紫和钛黄，它们都是基于矿物质的颜色。此外，三星还在自己的专卖店提供独有的钛蓝、钛绿 和钛橙色 。
。

做工一流：缝隙紧密均匀，智能手机很好地抵御了扭转压力，只有在我们试图扭转它时才会发出轻微的吱吱声。它整体非常坚固，尽管重量不轻，但拿在手里却很舒适。它在视觉和触觉上都给人留下了非常高品质的印象。据说康宁大猩猩装甲玻璃的抗磨损能力比上一代产品要强得多，而且正面和背面都采用了这种玻璃。

Galaxy 智能手机再次通过了 IP68 防尘防水认证。不过，三星规定后者只能在 1.5 米深的水中浸泡 30 分钟。卡槽及其盖板与边框齐平，最多可容纳两张 nano SIM 卡。

尺寸比较

❌
165 mm 71 mm 8.3 mm 187 g163.4 mm 78.1 mm 8.9 mm 233 g162.9 mm 76.7 mm 8.77 mm 219 g162.6 mm 76.5 mm 8.8 mm 213 g162.3 mm 79 mm 8.6 mm 232 g161.4 mm 75.3 mm 8.49 mm 223 g161.2 mm 74.8 mm 8.6 mm 199 g159.9 mm 76.7 mm 8.25 mm 221 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

功能 -Galaxy S24 Ultra，无任何实际缝隙

三星Galaxy S24 Ultra 再次提供了一个 USB-C 端口作为物理接口，支持 3.2（Gen.1）标准。借助 USB OTG，不仅可以为智能手机充电，还可以连接外设、耳机、存储介质等。在拷贝测试中，我们将华硕 ROG Strix Arion Case（USB 3.2 Gen. 2）和三星 980 Pro 连接到智能手机，数据传输速率达到 227.97 MB/s。数据传输速率为 227.97 MB/s。连接的存储介质可以用 FAT、FAT32 或 exFAT 格式化。对于 NTFS，三星只支持读取磁盘驱动器。

USB 端口还支持有线图像输出。用户可以选择镜像面板内容或切换到 DeX 模式。后者是一个具有一定技术可选性的桌面界面。它最多只能以全高清模式运行。厚厚的黑边依然存在，尤其是在 WQHD 屏幕上。在这里，无线设备可能是更好的选择。

此外，Galaxy S24 Ultra 还提供蓝牙 5.3、NFC 和超宽带芯片（UWB）。遗憾的是，三星尚未选择现代蓝牙 5.4 LE。除此之外，作为一款高端智能手机，S24 Ultra 的功能还是相当齐全的。只有 Xperia 1 V 音频插孔和 microSD 支持；唯一值得批评的是缺少红外爆破器。

 

 

首页: 麦克风
首页: 麦克风
左侧
左侧
右：音量、功能键
右：音量、功能键
底部SIM卡、麦克风、USB、扬声器、S Pen
底部SIM卡、麦克风、USB、扬声器、S Pen

软件 - 提供七年更新的人工智能手机

三星Galaxy S24 Ultra 配备了Android 14 和内部用户界面 One UI 6.1。承诺七年更新。除了目前的Pixel 智能手机 之外，三星是唯一一家拥有如此长的更新承诺的制造商。我们测试设备上的安全更新是从 2024 年 2 月 1 日开始的，因此非常及时。S24 Ultra 只是在 Play 安全补丁方面落后，使用的是 2023 年 7 月的安全补丁。

不过，One UI 6.1 的众多新功能才是真正的亮点，它提供了大量新的人工智能功能，旨在将三星智能手机打造成一款人工智能手机。与谷歌类似，三星正在采取一种混合方法，只在设备上保留几项功能，而将更复杂的任务外包给云，这也是必须拥有三星账户的原因。不过，与谷歌不同的是，韩国人从一开始就公开说明了哪些人工智能功能需要云连接。用户也可以在设置中停用该功能，这样所有个人数据都将保留在智能手机上。

新的翻译工具是直接在智能手机上执行的功能之一。您可以直接在 Messenger 中翻译信息，这与我们在谷歌 Pixel 上已经知道的功能类似，但在三星手机上仍然可以显示原文。最棒的是，现在这也适用于电话呼叫。现在，使用三星键盘编写的文本不仅可以检查拼写和语法，还可以提出文体改进建议。三星浏览器可以概括网站上的长篇文字，而不需要的人物、物体或倒影也可以在照片应用中轻松修饰。大肆宣传的人工智能可以实现所有这一切，甚至更多。

其中还包括 "圆圈搜索"，只需在屏幕上的物体周围画一个圆圈，谷歌就会在网上搜索相关条目。这个功能已经非常好用，可以让人们更容易地识别想要的产品或未知的建筑。不过，它也不是完全没有错误。例如，在德国慕尼黑拍摄的一座教堂被误认为是瑞士巴塞尔的一座教堂，而根据位置数据，这应该是显而易见的。

尽管如此，许多新功能无疑为日常生活带来了附加值，至少明显加快了生活节奏。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 终于有了 WiFi 7

Galaxy S24 Ultra 是首款支持当前 WiFi 7 标准（包括 6 GHz 频段）的三星智能手机。在使用华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 （Wi-Fi 6E）参考路由器进行的测试中，传输速率并非完美无瑕，但经验表明，三星将通过更新改善这一问题。我们稍后将再次测试，希望能用 WiFi 7 进行测试。 

另一方面，WiFi 信号强度非常好，S24 Ultra 在续航能力方面也令人印象深刻。在网状系统中，更换楼层和接入点都不会引起注意。

移动通信方面的变化不大。Galaxy 智能手机支持多个频段，因此几乎可以在任何地方建立强大的连接。在大都市环境中，接收特性非常好，无可挑剔。

Networking
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
iperf3 receive AXE11000
801 (min: 397) MBit/s ∼47%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
556 (min: 253) MBit/s ∼31%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1553 (min: 815) MBit/s ∼87%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1461 (min: 1284) MBit/s ∼84%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1717 (min: 1627) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1783 (min: 911) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1728 (min: 1374) MBit/s ∼97%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1731 (min: 1657) MBit/s ∼100%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
iperf3 receive AXE11000
810 (min: 793) MBit/s ∼47%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
931 (min: 893) MBit/s ∼52%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1534 (min: 1415) MBit/s ∼86%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1345 (min: 1298) MBit/s ∼78%
Honor Magic5 Pro
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1531 (min: 1445) MBit/s ∼89%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1474 (min: 743) MBit/s ∼83%
Sony Xperia 1 V
iperf3 receive AXE11000
818 (min: 410) MBit/s ∼48%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
946 (min: 912) MBit/s ∼53%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1778 (min: 891) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1530 (min: 1492) MBit/s ∼88%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
824 (min: 689) MBit/s ∼46%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
826 (min: 776) MBit/s ∼48%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
iperf3 receive AXE11000
897 (min: 870) MBit/s ∼52%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
892 (min: 333) MBit/s ∼50%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1468 (min: 1069) MBit/s ∼83%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1467 (min: 1304) MBit/s ∼85%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1496 (min: 1387) MBit/s ∼87%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1671 (min: 801) MBit/s ∼94%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1754 (min: 1618) MBit/s ∼99%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1504 (min: 1343) MBit/s ∼87%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 receive AXE11000
711 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼41%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
725 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼41%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1443 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼81%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1387 (min: 668) MBit/s ∼80%
090180270360450540630720810900990108011701260135014401530162017101800Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1526 (815-1800)
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max Apple A17 Pro, Apple A17 Pro GPU; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1534 (1415-1573)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1461 (1284-1543)
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max Apple A17 Pro, Apple A17 Pro GPU; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1344 (1298-1361)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø786 (397-819)
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max Apple A17 Pro, Apple A17 Pro GPU; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø809 (793-818)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø548 (253-611)
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max Apple A17 Pro, Apple A17 Pro GPU; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø931 (893-949)
GPS 测试：户外
户外活动
GPS 测试：室内
室内

三星将所有全球网络都列为支持的卫星网络，只有印度本地的 NavIC 不支持。我们还发现了一些频段支持方面的空白：例如，伽利略卫星不支持 E5b 频段，北斗卫星不支持 B2b 频段。在信号强度良好的情况下，即使在室内也能快速定位。

在一次骑行中，我们比较了 S24 和 Garmin Venu 2 的跟踪能力。两款设备都没有提供完美的结果，但Galaxy S24 Ultra 在房屋之间的定位更准确一些，而健身智能手表在湖边的表现稍好一些。无论如何，三星智能手机是完成所有导航任务的理想装备。

全球导航卫星系统测试骑行：环湖
全球导航卫星系统测试骑行：环湖
全球导航卫星系统测试骑行：环路
全球导航卫星系统测试骑行：环路
全球导航卫星系统试乘：总结
全球导航卫星系统试乘：总结

电话和语音质量

三星Galaxy S24 Ultra 可容纳两张 nano SIM 卡或使用两张 eSIM 卡。支持 WiFi 通话和 VoLTE 等功能。

拿在耳边时，语音质量非常好。我们的通话参与者很容易听懂，S24 用户的声音也能非常自然地再现。背景噪音过滤得非常可靠。不过，当噪音很大时，用户的声音显得有些压抑，但背景噪音听不到。在扬声器模式下，三星智能手机的麦克风音质很好，麦克风距离一米半也没有问题。

首先必须在设置中激活来电实时翻译功能。然后在聊天窗口中会出现一个相应的字段，在此进行翻译。首先必须下载相应的语言模型，每个模型的大小约为 0.5 GB。语言选择相当多，包括英语、韩语、中文、德语、西班牙语、波兰语和其他一些语言。口语语言不会自动识别，必须事先设置。

在开始翻译通话时，接听方会收到通话即将开始的提示。仍然可以听到口语，但随后会有机器语音说出翻译内容。这对于简单的对话非常有效，而且还能记录在笔录中。不过，在对话过程中，应注意确保环境安静，因为噪音抑制似乎根本不起作用，或者只在非常有限的范围内起作用，这意味着旁人说的话也可能被翻译出来。该功能在处理专业术语或混合语言时也会出现问题。但它仍然是一个很大的帮助，尤其是在没有其他办法使用共同语言的情况下。

相机 - 只有潜望镜光学系统得到了真正的升级

与 S24 Ultra 自拍
与 S24 Ultra 自拍

与 S23 Ultra 相比，三星Galaxy S24 Ultra 的前置摄像头在技术上没有变化，只是得益于更先进的 ISP 和经过修改的软件。它具有自动对焦功能，能以高达 60 FPS 的速度录制超高清视频。在光线条件良好的情况下，它能拍摄出令人满意的照片，但与背面的主镜头相比，这些照片略显苍白。

背面组件仍由四个镜头组成，但只有潜望镜摄像头进行了升级。它不再是像 S23 Ultra 那样的 10 倍光学变焦，而是降低到 5 倍放大。作为回报，传感器的尺寸增大了，虽然仍不是巨型，但分辨率也更精细，达到了 50MP。这应该不会影响较长焦距下的画质：三星甚至提到了 10 倍放大时几乎无损失的混合变焦，数字变焦也可将焦距延长至 2300 毫米（100 倍）。

S24 Ultra Zoom 的画质令人印象深刻。即使放大到 10 倍，图像仍然非常吸引人。只有 3 倍变焦时，图像才会变得模糊不清，因为它也有一个专用镜头，而且越往后变焦质量越差。三星为什么不对其进行升级，这让我们感到有些费解。较高的变焦级别可能适合社交媒体，但肯定不适合高质量打印，尤其是放大到 30 倍以上。但在日常生活中，远距离变焦仍很实用，可以使标志或告示从远处清晰可见。

0.6x
0.6x
1x
1x
3x
3x
5x
10x
30x
100x

变焦从 0.6x 到 100x

12 MP 模式50 MP 模式
12 MP 模式
50 MP 模式

三星也没有为超广角相机添加新的传感器。这一点在其前代产品中已经很明显，在这款产品中也没有得到更好的体现。不过，集成的微距功能还是很实用的。

主摄像头使用的是去年自制的 200 万像素传感器。S23 Ultra 的模糊点 S23 Ultra的模糊点似乎已成为过去，因为我们在测试设备上没有发现任何模糊点。Galaxy S24 Ultra 采用像素二进制技术，可生成 1200 万像素的照片。也可以生成 5000 万像素的照片，但只建议在光线条件好且无背光的情况下使用（见比较）。在专业模式下，也可以拍摄 2400 万像素的照片。总的来说，三星提供了许多模式和设置选项。附加的 Expert RAW 应用程序可用于天体摄影等。

在兔子的照片中，S24 Ultra 几乎会烧掉白衬衫上的一些区域。虽然亮度很高，但细节依然清晰可见。不过，三星可以让这里的细节更均匀一些。除此之外，这款Galaxy 智能手机还具有高动态范围和创建超 HDR 照片的能力。锐化功能偶尔会很强，如果自动功能突出了阴影，有时就会牺牲细节。尽管如此，三星手机的整体成像性能还是不错的。

在弱光环境下，Galaxy S24 Ultra 会自动切换到夜景模式，通常会选择比竞争对手稍长的曝光时间。但即使是三秒的曝光时间，用手拍摄的照片也能达到令人满意的效果。说到这里，我们应该提到改进后的 "实时取景 "功能，因为它与 S23 Ultra 相比有了天壤之别。在图像稳定方面，S24 Ultra 绝对是最好的，即使在长焦距下也是如此。

相机应用程序
相机应用程序
相机应用程序
相机应用程序
RAW 专家
RAW 专家
RAW 专家
RAW 专家
模式 高宽比 分辨率
照片 全屏、1:1、16:9、4:3 12 / 50 / 200 MPix
专业 全屏、1:1、16:9、4:3 12 / 50 MPix
专家级 RAW 4:3 12 / 24 / 50 MPix
视频 全屏、1:1、16:9 高清 (30FPS)、全高清 (30/60FPS)、超高清 (30/60FPS)、8k (30 FPS)
专业视频 全高清、1:1、16:9、21:9 高清 (30FPS)、全高清 (24/30/60/120FPS)、超高清 (24/30/60/120FPS)、8k (24/30 FPS)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraUltra wide angle5x zoomLow light photo

三星Galaxy S24 Ultra 支持从 720p 到超高清再到 8k 的多种视频分辨率。这款智能手机的刷新率也很灵活，每秒可提供 24 至 120 帧，包括支持 HDR10+。在慢动作模式下可以达到更高的帧率。

我们喜欢在自动模式下拍摄的视频。在超高清（60 FPS）和激活 HDR10+ 的测试录制中，我们获得了不错的效果，但背光补偿效果一般，牺牲了对比度。

在受控照明条件下，三星Galaxy S24 Ultra 实现了良好的色彩再现，没有出现任何重大异常。只有蓝色色调的 DeltaE 略有增加。

我们的测试图表显示效果很好（即使在 200 MP 的情况下），许多细节都得以保留。不过，强力锐化也会导致外围区域的一些细节消失。

ColorChecker
4.4 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
3 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
1.2 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
2.1 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
2 ∆E
1.3 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra: 4.64 ∆E min: 1.24 - max: 9.68 ∆E
ColorChecker
11.2 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
16.1 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
20.1 ∆E
16 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
17.8 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
17.9 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
15.6 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
12 ∆E
19.8 ∆E
24.6 ∆E
14.9 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
19.1 ∆E
21 ∆E
17.4 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra: 15.57 ∆E min: 9.22 - max: 24.56 ∆E

附件和保修 - S24 Ultra 仅随附 USB 电缆

除了 USB-C 数据线和 SIM 卡针之外，三星Galaxy S24 Ultra 的供货范围只包括几张纸。此外，还有各种保护套、电源或充电站可供选择。

在美国，三星为Galaxy S24 Ultra 提供 12 个月的有限保修服务，还可以购买Care+ 保险套餐作为补充。保修期为 24 个月或 36 个月，还包括额外的防盗保护。价格从每月 8 美元、为期 36 个月的计划到单次支付 129 美元至 349 美元、为期 24 个月的计划不等。 如果发生盗窃，免赔额从 99 美元到 199 美元不等，每年仅限三次索赔。

输入设备和操作 - 配备 S Pen 的 AI 手机

配备 S Pen 触控笔的三星Galaxy S24 Ultra。
S24 Ultra 和 S Pen

三星Galaxy S24 Ultra 没有屏幕保护膜，是首款采用康宁大猩猩装甲保护玻璃的智能手机。这提供了非常好的滑动性能，屏幕输入可以快速准确地执行。

您还可以使用 S Pen，它可以收纳在手机壳中，代替您的手指。主动式触控笔支持多达 4096 级压力，通过蓝牙连接，输入延迟为 9 毫秒。S Pen 再次提供了许多附加功能，但自 Galaxy Note20 Ultra.

生物识别安全由高质量的超声波传感器提供保障，它能快速、可靠地检测到储存的手指。此外，也可以通过前置摄像头使用安全性较低的面部识别功能，该功能也能快速工作，但在光线很暗的环境中需要较长的时间，甚至有时会拒绝访问智能手机。

Galaxy 手机的线性振动电机可提供清晰的触觉反馈，而且非常安静。

显示屏 - 超亮，几乎不反光

Galaxy S24 Ultra 的 6.8 英寸（17.27 厘米）动态 AMOLED x2 显示屏现在的边缘是平的，这在使用 S Pen 时特别方便。该面板的最高分辨率为 WQHD+，但也可以较低的像素密度运行，以节约能源。借助 LTPO 功能，系统可以在 1 到 120 Hz 之间动态调整刷新率。该系统缺乏杜比视界（Dolby Vision）功能，但支持其他 HDR 标准。

与 S23 Ultra 相比，三星提高了显示屏亮度，宣称亮度可达 2500 cd/m²。在激活环境光传感器的纯白显示屏上，S24 Ultra 在图像中心发出 1317 cd/m² （+200 cd/m²）的亮度。如果亮部和暗部均匀分布（APL18），则可达到 2747 cd/m²（+1,000 cd/m²），远远超出了这一要求。在 HDR 播放时，我们甚至测得 2942 cd/m²。

不使用环境光传感器的用户在全白模式下的亮度为 419 cd/m²，而 APL18 模式下的亮度则高达 503 cd/m²。通过附加亮度的切换开关，亮度可增至 726 或 881 cd/m²。

RGGB 子像素网格
RGGB 子像素网格

三星在确保护眼操作方面做了很多正确的事情：通过 EyeComfort 功能，系统可以根据当前的照明条件自动调节显示屏的色温，以尽可能减少蓝光。在黑暗环境中，极低的最低亮度（1.01 cd/m²）可尽可能减轻眼睛的负担，甚至可以通过额外的调光选项将亮度降至 0.65 cd/m²。

三星甚至还改进了 PWM 调光功能，并将频率提高了一倍，但这仍然不能使其不闪烁；敏感的人可能仍然会觉得这很刺激。没有检测到时间抖动。

1380
cd/m²		1378
cd/m²		1403
cd/m²
1374
cd/m²		1317
cd/m²		1385
cd/m²
1345
cd/m²		1333
cd/m²		1370
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1403 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1365 cd/m² Minimum: 1.01 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 1317 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3120x1440, 6.8"		Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
OLED, 2796x1290, 6.7"		Sony Xperia 1 V
AMOLED, 3840x1644, 6.5"		Motorola Edge 40 Pro
P-OLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"		Google Pixel 8 Pro
OLED, 2992x1344, 6.7"		Vivo X100 Pro
AMOLED, 2800x1260, 6.8"
Screen
20%
12%
17%
25%
37%
Brightness middle
1317
1102
-16%
934
-29%
1056
-20%
1510
15%
1392
6%
Brightness
1365
1102
-19%
948
-31%
1055
-23%
1467
7%
1360
0%
Brightness Distribution
94
98
4%
96
2%
92
-2%
92
-2%
84
-11%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.4
1.1
68%
1.5
56%
1.28
62%
1.1
68%
0.6
82%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5
3.1
38%
4
20%
2.85
43%
3.8
24%
1.3
74%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.8
1.6
43%
1.3
54%
1.7
39%
1.7
39%
0.9
68%
Gamma
2 110%
2.19 100%
2.2 100%
2.206 100%
2.23 99%
2.25 98%
CCT
6458 101%
6555 99%
6384 102%
6320 103%
6670 97%
6540 99%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 480 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 480 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 480 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最低显示亮度
Min.
25% 显示屏亮度
25%
50% 显示亮度
50%
75% 显示亮度
75%
最大显示亮度
100%

在固定变焦级别和不同亮度设置下进行的系列测量

在过去两年中，三星 Ultra 系列产品的色彩和灰度再现精度逐渐变差。虽然 S22 Ultra(DeltaE：灰阶 1.3 / 色彩 1.2）仍能提供模范值，而 S23 Ultra(dE 2.3 / 2.2)则要差一些，尽管仍处于很好的水平。然而，S24 Ultra（dE 2.8 / 3.4）在高端标准上稍显落后，在对比领域也处于落后状态。不过，这在日常使用中并不明显。

色彩模式 "自然 " 效果最佳，几乎完全覆盖了所选的 sRGB 色彩空间。而S23 Ultra 则几乎完全覆盖了更大的 DCI-P3 色彩空间。三星的这一发展令人费解，因为使用 S24 Ultra 拍摄的照片也使用 DCI-P3 作为工作色彩空间。这里肯定没有实现色彩的最佳表现。

灰度（模式：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
灰度（模式：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩（模式：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩（模式：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（模式：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（模式：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
饱和度（模式：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
饱和度（模式：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
灰度（模式：鲜艳，白平衡：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
灰度（模式：鲜艳，白平衡：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩（模式：鲜艳，白平衡：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩（模式：鲜艳，白平衡：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（模式：鲜艳，白平衡：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（模式：鲜艳，白平衡：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
饱和度（模式：鲜艳，白平衡：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
饱和度（模式：鲜艳，白平衡：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
1.41 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.771 ms rise
↘ 0.6435 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
3.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.76 ms rise
↘ 2.046 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

三星Galaxy S24 Ultra 在户外表现非常出色。尤其是防反射玻璃表面，它能将反光降到最低。再加上高亮度，几乎没有一款智能手机比它更适合晴天使用。

我们非常喜欢三星Galaxy S24 Ultra 的可视角度稳定性。只有在视角非常平的情况下，亮度才会明显下降，显示屏也会变得有点冷。其他智能手机在这方面做得更好一些，但我们从未发现这种现象令人讨厌。

三星Galaxy S24 Ultra 的视角稳定性
三星Galaxy S24 Ultra 的视角稳定性

性能 - S24 Ultra 中的骁龙 8 Gen 3 处理器Galaxy

Galaxy S24 Ultra 再次采用了高通公司顶级 SoC 的特别版本，即 骁龙 8 代 3Galaxy.这与传统的 骁龙 8 代 3但遗憾的是，三星并没有透露太多不同之处的细节。只有 Cortex-X4 性能内核的 CPU 时钟速率略有提高，在 S24 Ultra 中最高可达 3.39 GHz（+90 MHz），这一点已得到三星的确认。

微博用户 "Feiwei "泄露了更多规格信息，但这些信息尚未得到高通公司或三星公司的官方确认。因此 Adreno 750据说，Adreno 750 图形处理器的主频可达 1000 MHz（+100 MHz），LPDDR5x 内存的主频为 4224 MHz。

在 Geekbench 6 的单核测试中，X4 内核的额外时钟频率使Galaxy S24 略胜一筹，而在 Geekbench 5.5 中，这种领先优势更为明显。当使用所有内核（多核）时，RedMagic 9 Pro 在单核测试中略胜一筹。 RedMagic 9 Pro更快，但它也有主动散热。

Galaxy S24 Ultra 在其他系统速度基准测试中也取得了很好的成绩，但领先优势并不明显。不出所料，该系统在日常使用中运行非常流畅。

Geekbench 6.3 | Geekbench 5.5 | Antutu v10 | Antutu v9 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | AImark | Geekbench ML
Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192
2930 Points +28%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
2287 Points
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
2278 Points 0%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
2270 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy
  (2072 - 2287, n=3)
2199 Points -4%
Sony Xperia 1 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1774 Points -22%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
1769 Points -23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 3479, n=173, last 2 years)
1494 Points -35%
Multi-Core
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192
7244 Points +2%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
7151 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
7102 Points
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
6875 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy
  (6354 - 7102, n=3)
6783 Points -4%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
4538 Points -36%
Sony Xperia 1 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
4255 Points -40%
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 10401, n=173, last 2 years)
4189 Points -41%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1716 Points
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1687 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy
  (1651 - 1716, n=2)
1684 Points -2%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1575 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
1556 Points -9%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1418 Points -17%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
1274 Points -26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=175, last 2 years)
1040 Points -39%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
6439 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
6426 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy
  (5899 - 6426, n=2)
6163 Points -4%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
5393 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
5082 Points -21%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
4192 Points -35%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
3624 Points -44%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 8816, n=175, last 2 years)
3474 Points -46%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
2157865 Points +17%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1905751 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1837994 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy
  (1492419 - 1837994, n=3)
1672062 Points -9%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192
1487075 Points -19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 3015111, n=106, last 2 years)
1307393 Points -29%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
1113506 Points -39%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1633806 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1473430 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy
  ()
1473430 Points 0%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1249078 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
1226224 Points -17%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
896410 Points -39%
Average of class Smartphone
  (99654 - 2056989, n=104, last 2 years)
810694 Points -45%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
Points -100%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
20943 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
18672 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy
  (18026 - 18672, n=3)
18273 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
15991 Points -14%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
15876 Points -15%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
15130 Points -19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 27169, n=197, last 2 years)
13174 Points -29%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
11824 Points -37%
CrossMark - Overall
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy
  (1443 - 1473, n=3)
1453 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1443 Points
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192
1408 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
1226 Points -15%
Sony Xperia 1 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1224 Points -15%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1167 Points -19%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
935 Points -35%
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2485, n=165, last 2 years)
917 Points -36%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
778 Points -46%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
Points -100%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
10897 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
9696 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy
  (9267 - 9696, n=3)
9506 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
9091 Points -6%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
7466 Points -23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 12993, n=158, last 2 years)
6499 Points -33%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
Points -100%
System
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
16475 Points
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
15935 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy
  (15087 - 16475, n=3)
15721 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
14275 Points -13%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
11159 Points -32%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 17953, n=158, last 2 years)
10346 Points -37%
Memory
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
11460 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
10389 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy
  (9073 - 10389, n=3)
9564 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
9075 Points -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 18911, n=158, last 2 years)
7058 Points -32%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
6601 Points -36%
Graphics
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
36002 Points +29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy
  (26269 - 32352, n=3)
28842 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
28497 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
27905 Points
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
26837 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=158, last 2 years)
17998 Points -36%
Web
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
2145 Points +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy
  (1815 - 1950, n=3)
1882 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
1850 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1815 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2363, n=158, last 2 years)
1578 Points -13%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1572 Points -13%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
27018 Points +43%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
18852 Points
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
18048 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 81594, n=150, last 2 years)
17814 Points -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy
  (15793 - 18852, n=3)
17486 Points -7%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
16988 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
16511 Points -12%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
15782 Points -16%
AImark - Score v3.x
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy
  (1518 - 239813, n=3)
88473 Points +5728%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192
29087 Points +1816%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=143, last 2 years)
25319 Points +1568%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1693 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1518 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
1312 Points -14%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
1109 Points -27%
Sony Xperia 1 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1067 Points -30%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
941 Points -38%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
Points -100%
Geekbench ML
0.6 TensorFlow Lite NNAPI
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
678 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (186 - 3410, n=29, last 2 years)
647 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy
  (598 - 678, n=2)
638 Points -6%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
530 Points -22%
0.6 TensorFlow Lite GPU
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy
  (1254 - 1308, n=2)
1281 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1254 Points
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1252 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (123 - 1478, n=33, last 2 years)
746 Points -41%
0.6 TensorFlow Lite CPU
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1342 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1317 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy
  (1288 - 1317, n=2)
1303 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (246 - 1342, n=34, last 2 years)
824 Points -37%

遗憾的是，三星Galaxy S24 Ultra 无法真正利用集成 Adreno 750 GPU 的更高峰值时钟速度。 Adreno 750 GPU 的优势。与传统的 Adreno 相比，S24 Ultra 的性能并没有得到更大的提升。 骁龙 8 代 3相比，性能降低了 5-7%，尤其是在使用 OpenGL ES 而不是 Vulkan 作为 API 的情况下。尽管如此，性能还是非常不错的。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5150 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4804 Points
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
3879 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3791 Points -21%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3503 Points -27%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2410 Points -50%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5143 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5040 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3829 Points -24%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
3765 Points -25%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3280 Points -35%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2422 Points -52%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
20068 Points
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
19566 Points -3%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
15260 Points -24%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
14369 Points -28%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8922 Points -56%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8480 Points +14%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7451 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6293 Points -16%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5044 Points -32%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
33142 Points +14%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
29081 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
23070 Points -21%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13743 Points -53%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
20131 Points +14%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
17677 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
14487 Points -18%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9935 Points -44%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Sony Xperia 1 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
116 fps -3%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
61 fps -49%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
549 fps
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
543 fps -1%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
492 fps -10%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
479 fps -13%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
466 fps -15%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
444 fps -19%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
348 fps -37%
Sony Xperia 1 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
301 fps -45%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps -1%
Sony Xperia 1 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
99 fps -17%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
62 fps -48%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
362 fps +7%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
339 fps
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
327 fps -4%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
301 fps -11%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
262 fps -23%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
261 fps -23%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
174 fps -49%
Sony Xperia 1 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
115 fps -66%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +3%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +3%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
117 fps
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
115 fps -2%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
91 fps -22%
Sony Xperia 1 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
68 fps -42%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
62 fps -47%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -49%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
269 fps +9%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
259 fps +5%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
247 fps
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
214 fps -13%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
190 fps -23%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
180 fps -27%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
112 fps -55%
Sony Xperia 1 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
108 fps -56%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
107 fps +29%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
88 fps +6%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
83 fps
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
71 fps -14%
Sony Xperia 1 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
69 fps -17%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
65 fps -22%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -28%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -28%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
159 fps +12%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
142 fps
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
135 fps -5%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
125 fps -12%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
123 fps -13%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
110 fps -23%
Sony Xperia 1 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
88 fps -38%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
75 fps -47%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
85 fps +18%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
76 fps +6%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
72 fps
Sony Xperia 1 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
67 fps -7%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
63 fps -12%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -17%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -17%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
55 fps -24%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
85 fps +20%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
71 fps
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
67 fps -6%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
64 fps -10%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
61 fps -14%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
61 fps -14%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
37 fps -48%
Sony Xperia 1 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
24 fps -66%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +5%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
114 fps
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
109 fps -4%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
91 fps -20%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
84 fps -26%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -47%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
59 fps -48%
Sony Xperia 1 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
45 fps -61%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
209 fps +12%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
187 fps
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
162 fps -13%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
157 fps -16%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
151 fps -19%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
117 fps -37%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98 fps -48%
Sony Xperia 1 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
82 fps -56%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
40 fps
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
39 fps -2%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
38 fps -5%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
31 fps -22%
Sony Xperia 1 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
31 fps -22%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
28 fps -30%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
25 fps -37%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
16 fps -60%

Basemark GPUScore

0102030405060708090100110120130140Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; GPUScore: The Expedition; 2560x1440 Official: Ø56.7 (15.1-93.1)
Vivo X100 Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; GPUScore: The Expedition; 2560x1440 Official; 0.9.1 Vulkan 1.0: Ø65.6 (42-146.7)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; GPUScore: The Expedition; Official Native: Ø48.3 (13.1-77.7)
Vivo X100 Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; GPUScore: The Expedition; Official Native; 0.9.1 Vulkan 1.0: Ø69.5 (45.9-106.1)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; GPUScore: Sacred Path; 2560x1440 Official: Ø18.2 (10.7-33.1)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; GPUScore: Sacred Path; Official Native: Ø14.6 (9.59-27.7)

Galaxy S24 Ultra 的网页浏览非常流畅。在基准测试中，三星 AI 智能手机偶尔能超过 iPhone 15 Pro Max.

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 4 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 17)
254.048 Points +21%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (Chrome 121)
209.919 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy (155.8 - 210, n=3)
177.6 Points -15%
Xiaomi 14 Pro (Chrome 120)
162.564 Points -23%
Sony Xperia 1 V (Chrome 114)
143.878 Points -31%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years)
124.4 Points -41%
Honor Magic5 Pro (Chrome 111)
116.696 Points -44%
Google Pixel 8 Pro (Chrome 117)
105.175 Points -50%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro (Chrome 112)
100.8 Points -52%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 17)
445 runs/min +68%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (Chrome 121)
265 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy (237 - 281, n=3)
261 runs/min -2%
Sony Xperia 1 V (Chrome 114)
168 runs/min -37%
Google Pixel 8 Pro (Chrome 117)
158 runs/min -40%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=152, last 2 years)
143.9 runs/min -46%
Xiaomi 14 Pro (Chrome 120)
141 runs/min -47%
Honor Magic5 Pro (Chrome 111)
111 runs/min -58%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro (Chome 112)
70.4 runs/min -73%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy (181 - 211, n=3)
195.7 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (Chrome 121)
195 Points
Xiaomi 14 Pro (Chrome 120)
181 Points -7%
Sony Xperia 1 V (Chrome 114)
166 Points -15%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=159, last 2 years)
117.1 Points -40%
Google Pixel 8 Pro (Chrome 117)
103 Points -47%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro (Chrome 112)
99 Points -49%
Honor Magic5 Pro (Chrome 111)
98 Points -50%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 17)
304 Points +39%
Sony Xperia 1 V
235 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (Chrome 121)
218 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy (192 - 218, n=2)
205 Points -6%
Xiaomi 14 Pro (Chrome 120)
198 Points -9%
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)
150.2 Points -31%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro (Chrome 112)
147 Points -33%
Google Pixel 8 Pro (Chrome 117)
129 Points -41%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 17)
86270 Points +20%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (Chrome 121)
72011 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy (66754 - 72835, n=3)
70533 Points -2%
Sony Xperia 1 V (Chrome 114)
60007 Points -17%
Xiaomi 14 Pro (Chrome 120)
54365 Points -25%
Google Pixel 8 Pro (Chrome 117)
49506 Points -31%
Honor Magic5 Pro (Chrome 111)
39825 Points -45%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years)
38550 Points -46%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro (Chrome 112)
31254 Points -57%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years)
1523 ms * -154%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro (Chrome 112)
1265.2 ms * -111%
Honor Magic5 Pro (Chrome 111)
981.4 ms * -64%
Google Pixel 8 Pro (Chrome 117)
840.2 ms * -40%
Xiaomi 14 Pro (Chrome 120)
801.6 ms * -34%
Sony Xperia 1 V (Chrome 114)
701.7 ms * -17%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (Chrome 121)
599 ms *
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy (555 - 599, n=3)
576 ms * +4%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 17)
388.3 ms * +35%

* ... smaller is better

三星Galaxy S24 Ultra 采用快速 UFS 4.0 存储，不能使用 microSD 卡扩展。

在日常生活中，它的运行速度没有任何问题。在 AndroBench 中的写入率相对较低，但在 PCMark 内存测试中情况要好得多。

Samsung Galaxy S24 UltraHonor Magic5 ProMotorola Edge 40 ProGoogle Pixel 8 ProVivo X100 ProAverage 256 GB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
15%
62%
-41%
97%
40%
-9%
Sequential Read 256KB
3610.25
3344.12
-7%
3434.4
-5%
1501.13
-58%
3986.41
10%
3608 ?(3249 - 4384, n=26)
0%
1894 ?(226 - 4512, n=197, last 2 years)
-48%
Sequential Write 256KB
1893.63
2651.87
40%
2887.4
52%
257.28
-86%
3461.77
83%
2530 ?(555 - 3348, n=26)
34%
1476 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=197, last 2 years)
-22%
Random Read 4KB
437.12
267.91
-39%
451.3
3%
156.16
-64%
450.24
3%
406 ?(218 - 483, n=26)
-7%
278 ?(22.2 - 483, n=197, last 2 years)
-36%
Random Write 4KB
181.55
298.31
64%
539
197%
258.92
43%
709.25
291%
421 ?(152.9 - 730, n=26)
132%
312 ?(9.4 - 753, n=197, last 2 years)
72%
Samsung Galaxy S24 UltraXiaomi 14 ProHonor Magic5 ProVivo X100 ProAverage 256 GB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
PCMark for Android
-27%
-25%
14%
-13%
-29%
Storage 2.0 seq. read int.
2787.27
2075 ?(3.0.4061)
-26%
2647.12
-5%
1746.61
-37%
2522 ?(1504 - 3262, n=14)
-10%
1622 ?(251 - 3429, n=107, last 2 years)
-42%
Storage 2.0 seq. write int.
2991.55
2300 ?(3.0.4061)
-23%
2285.59
-24%
3236.36
8%
2256 ?(1108 - 2992, n=14)
-25%
1441 ?(94.2 - 3441, n=107, last 2 years)
-52%
Storage 2.0 random read int.
60.38
20.9 ?(3.0.4061)
-65%
28.45
-53%
67.74
12%
42.4 ?(20.9 - 60.4, n=14)
-30%
39.3 ?(13.4 - 70.6, n=107, last 2 years)
-35%
Storage 2.0 random write int.
96.83
28 ?(3.0.4061)
-71%
32.19
-67%
136.24
41%
69.9 ?(24.6 - 121.1, n=14)
-28%
63.6 ?(10.6 - 146.6, n=107, last 2 years)
-34%
Storage 2.0
32146
35634
11%

35634 ?(3.0.4061)
11%

39317
22%
46550
45%
41675 ?(16494 - 57180, n=21)
30%
37741 ?(6296 - 225108, n=142, last 2 years)
17%

游戏 - 游戏加速器提供实用功能

Galaxy S24 Ultra 拥有超大显示屏、强劲的扬声器和强大的 SoC，是玩游戏的理想之选。在 Game Booster 应用程序中，可以将这些功能集于一身，并进行多项调整。例如，当连接电源时，可以暂停充电，以避免产生过多热量，还可以调整屏幕分辨率或通知行为等。您还可以安装其他免费插件来扩展设置。

所有测试游戏都能以最高级别的细节运行。在最低设置下，《PUBG》还提供了 90 FPS 模式。玄心冲击》最高可达到 60 FPS。

我们将很快提供基准测试结果。

PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
源泉冲击
源泉冲击
游戏助推器
游戏助推器
带有 Perf-Z 覆盖层的源信冲击系统
带有 Perf-Z 覆盖层的源信冲击系统

排放 -Galaxy S24 Ultra，支持 Auracast

温度

倦怠基准
倦怠基准

三星Galaxy S24 Ultra 在闲置时始终保持凉爽宜人的温度，但在负载情况下温度会明显升高，我们使用 Burnout 基准进行了测试，尽管表面温度始终保持在安全水平。

在 "Burnout "基准测试中也可以很容易地观察到 CPU 和 GPU 的运行情况（见截图）。在很长一段时间内，两个单元的性能都会严重下降。但没有出现死机或过热警告。

在 3DMark 压力测试中，Galaxy 智能手机的性能也急剧下降。到最后，它的速度几乎没有超过 Galaxy S23 Ultra.在 Wild Life 测试中 Edge 40 Pro产生的帧数更多。游戏智能手机在这方面完全不同，因此三星可以做得更好。

Max. Load
 42.4 °C40.8 °C38 °C 
 42.6 °C42.7 °C39.1 °C 
 44.1 °C41.5 °C38.9 °C 
Maximum: 44.1 °C
Average: 41.1 °C
38.3 °C41 °C41.6 °C
39.3 °C40.5 °C45.8 °C
39.6 °C42.3 °C45.7 °C
Maximum: 45.8 °C
Average: 41.6 °C
Room Temperature 21.6 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.1 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.1 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.8 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.2 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life stress test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
78.9 % +71%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
78.8 % +71%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
65.7 % +43%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
46.1 %
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
40.8 % -11%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
76 % +35%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
74.6 % +32%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
65.4 % +16%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
56.4 %
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
46.9 % -17%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
68.1 % +26%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
66.1 % +23%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
53.9 %

3DMark Wild Life stress test

0102030405060708090100110Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash: Ø61 (47.5-102.9)
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe: Ø52.8 (47.3-60)
Vivo X100 Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash: Ø65.4 (49.5-95)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash: Ø60 (53.6-77.7)
Motorola Edge 40 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; 0.0.0.0: Ø61.5 (51.6-78.6)
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; 0.0.0.0: Ø105.8 (103.3-111.5)
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; 0.0.0.0: Ø96.1 (86.1-111.7)

3DMark Wild Life Unlimited stress test

0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash: Ø87.8 (72-121.8)
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe: Ø62.8 (55.9-93.3)
Vivo X100 Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash: Ø88.2 (73.7-104)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash: Ø72.7 (55.1-86.1)
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash: Ø117.1 (117-117.1)
Honor Magic5 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash: Ø76.6 (37.1-83.4)

3DMark Wild Life Extreme stress test

051015202530Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; 1.1.4.1: Ø21.3 (17.6-31.2)
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe: Ø17.1 (16.4-25)
Vivo X100 Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; 1.1.4.1: Ø20.4 (17-28.6)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; 1.1.0.2: Ø16.8 (13.5-23)
Motorola Edge 40 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; 1.1.0.2: Ø16.2 (14.8-19.9)
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; 1.1.4.1: Ø29.5 (28.4-31.3)
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; 1.1.4.1: Ø26.9 (24.5-31)

3DMark Solar Bay Unlimited stress test

051015202530Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; 1.0.6.5: Ø21.1 (16.3-31.3)
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe: Ø15.4 (14.1-17.8)
Vivo X100 Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; 1.0.6.5: Ø19.9 (15.3-27.8)
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; 1.0.6.5: Ø26.7 (24.3-29.1)
Honor Magic5 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; 1.0.1.2-rc1: Ø11 (7.67-17.5)

发言人

三星Galaxy S24 的两个扬声器再次经过 AKG 优化，支持 Dolby Atmos。它们的声音非常响亮，音质相对较好，不过低音稍弱，几乎没有低音。

此外，还可以通过 USB-C 接口连接外置扬声器或耳机；蓝牙也可以无线连接。不过，后者仅支持非常有限的音频编解码器。最多可无线连接两个设备，但只能使用 SBC 编解码器。音乐共享功能也已恢复。

得益于 One UI 6.1，S24 Ultra 现在还可以通过 Auracast 进行广播，这可以让范围内任意数量的接收器都能接收到音乐。该选项在蓝牙设置中有些隐蔽，但将来肯定会发挥重要作用。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.246.12530.739.63125.643.94026.742.85036.743.66324.644.38017.64610018.743.212518.245.716015.956.620017.356.125015.260.231514.160.440013.461.350013.866.563014.367.780013.774.9100012.478.1125012.778.6160012.177.2200012.981.6250012.584.6315012.284.1400012.884500013.184630013.578.5800013.176.91000013.774125001466.81600013.364SPL25.293N0.792.2median 13.5median 74.9Delta1.210.732.444.925.739.92138.618.740.12842.224.940.521.643.618.745.916.351.620.25515.55617.258.120.763.318.26513.568.51470.313.972.512.976.214.678.213.277.713.479.613.881.113.481.913.684.814.183.513.58013.58013.779.413.972.613.26526.792.30.891.9median 13.9median 76.21.58hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy S24 UltraApple iPhone 15 Pro Max
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (93 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.6% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 充电功率高达 45 瓦

耗电量

三星Galaxy S24 Ultra 闲置时的功耗非常低。对最大亮度的测量是在没有环境光线传感器的情况下进行的，因此在阳光下亮度会明显升高。一旦激活额外亮度选项，耗电量就会从 1.22 瓦增加到 1.79 瓦。

S24 Ultra 在有线状态下的最大充电功率为 45 瓦。从测量图中可以很好地看出，这个功率在开始充电时只使用了大约 6 分钟，然后就降到了大约 37 瓦。5000 毫安时电池的前 50%电量在 20 分钟内充满，35 分钟后达到 80%。大约一小时后，S24 Ultra 即可充满电。

S24 Ultra 的无线充电功率可达 15 瓦。这款智能手机还能通过 Wireless PowerShare 为其他产品无线充电。

Galaxy S24 Ultra 在 45 瓦电源上的充电周期
Galaxy S24 Ultra 在 45 瓦电源上的充电周期
Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.02 / 0.08 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.73 / 1.22 / 1.34 Watt
Load midlight 16.52 / 16.58 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
5000 mAh		Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
4422 mAh		Honor Magic5 Pro
5100 mAh		Sony Xperia 1 V
5000 mAh		Google Pixel 8 Pro
5050 mAh		Vivo X100 Pro
2700 mAh		Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
8%
14%
-33%
15%
30%
10%
8%
Idle Minimum *
0.73
0.5
32%
0.91
-25%
1.52
-108%
0.63
14%
0.46
37%
0.69 ?(0.51 - 0.83, n=3)
5%
0.883 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=161, last 2 years)
-21%
Idle Average *
1.22
1.97
-61%
1.63
-34%
2.16
-77%
1.47
-20%
0.92
25%
1.233 ?(1.18 - 1.3, n=3)
-1%
1.467 ?(0.6 - 4.36, n=161, last 2 years)
-20%
Idle Maximum *
1.34
1.99
-49%
1.67
-25%
2.2
-64%
1.55
-16%
0.95
29%
1.33 ?(1.21 - 1.44, n=3)
1%
1.621 ?(0.83 - 4.46, n=161, last 2 years)
-21%
Load Average *
16.52
3.36
80%
2.61
84%
7.85
52%
8.45
49%
11.72
29%
12.1 ?(6.23 - 16.5, n=3)
27%
6.58 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=155, last 2 years)
60%
Load Maximum *
16.58
10.43
37%
4.57
72%
11.57
30%
8.63
48%
11.79
29%
13.5 ?(8.01 - 16.6, n=3)
19%
9.91 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=155, last 2 years)
40%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910111213141516Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø7.63 (0.966-16.1)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.7 (1.089-14.7)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.98 (0.924-1.218)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.938 (0.899-1.321)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789101112131415Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø12.1 (9.83-15.6)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø11.6 (10.3-12.7)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.98 (0.924-1.218)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.938 (0.899-1.321)

电池寿命

在测试中，三星Galaxy S24 Ultra 的电池续航时间证明是可靠的。尤其是在调整显示屏亮度（150 cd/m²）的测试中，只有iPhone 的续航时间稍长。

不过，在日常生活中，我们注意到相机对电池的消耗特别大，如果经常使用，运行时间会明显缩短。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
37h 07min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 120)
19h 08min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
32h 02min
Load (maximum brightness)
3h 22min
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
5000 mAh		Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
4422 mAh		Honor Magic5 Pro
5100 mAh		Sony Xperia 1 V
5000 mAh		Motorola Edge 40 Pro
4600 mAh		Google Pixel 8 Pro
5050 mAh
Battery Runtime
39%
3%
-44%
-5%
-27%
Reader / Idle
2227
3514
58%
2580
16%
1321
-41%
2102
-6%
1344
-40%
H.264
1922
2013
5%
1249
-35%
859
-55%
1062
-45%
1122
-42%
WiFi v1.3
1148
1163
1%
1074
-6%
743
-35%
984
-14%
760
-34%
Load
202
384
90%
276
37%
297
47%
220
9%

Pros

+ 低反射且非常明亮的 LTPO 面板
+ 电池寿命长
+ 多功能摄像头设置
+ WiFi 7、UWB 和 Auracast
+ 七年更新
+ IP68 认证集成
+ 集成 S Pen

Cons

- 高端手机的平均色彩校准
- PWM 频率为 480 赫兹
- 适度的 SoC 冷却
- 蓝牙音频编解码器缺失

评价：拥有大量人工智能的强大旗舰机

回顾：三星Galaxy S24 Ultra。测试设备由德国三星公司提供。
回顾：三星Galaxy S24 Ultra。测试设备由德国三星公司提供。

三星Galaxy S24 Ultra 已经成功地得到了进一步开发。乍一看，变化不大，但微调效果明显。首先是显示屏，不仅更亮了，而且康宁大猩猩铠甲玻璃减少了高达 75% 的反光，这在户外带来了明显的不同。此外，三星还增加了许多新的人工智能功能，WiFi 7 也终于登场，甚至连 Auracast 也进入了Galaxy 智能手机。七年来，Android 。

三星Galaxy S24 Ultra 也许并不完美，但在 2024 年很难找到一款更好的智能手机。

相机也得到了小幅升级：新的潜望镜变焦是一个明显的改进，改进后的实时取景功能也是早该实现的。遗憾的是，超广角和较小的光学变焦这两个摄像头仍然急需升级。

出色的显示屏也难免受到批评。虽然 PWM 闪烁的频率提高了一倍，达到了 480 Hz，但对于敏感的人来说可能还是太低了。色彩还原也略好于专业要求，但在日常使用中绝不会成为负面因素。

Galaxy S24 Ultra 的强劲替代产品有 iPhone 15 Pro Max以及 索尼 Xperia 1 V或可折叠手机，如 Honor Magic V2.

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和供应情况

Galaxy S24 Ultra 可直接从Samsung 网上商店购买。但也可在其他零售商处购买。例如，亚马逊提供的 512 GB 版本的钛黄智能手机售价为 1269.99 美元。

价格截至 2024 年 3 月 7 日，可能会有变动。

Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra - 03/04/2024 v7 (old)
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
93%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
97%
Connectivity
71 / 70 → 100%
Weight
88%
Battery
94%
Display
93%
Games Performance
72 / 64 → 100%
Application Performance
95 / 86 → 100%
Temperature
87%
Noise
100%
Audio
75 / 90 → 83%
Camera
85%
Average
86%
91%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 三星Galaxy S24 Ultra 评测：终极智能手机变身人工智能智能手机
Daniel Schmidt, 2024-03- 7 (Update: 2024-08-15)