三星Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022平板电脑评测--更新后的电池寿命得到改善
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
81.2 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2023 | Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 T618, Mali-G52 MP2 | 477 g | 7 mm | 10.40" | 2000x1200 | |
80 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2023 | Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 T610, Mali-G52 MP2 | 460 g | 8.5 mm | 10.10" | 1920x1200 | |
81.2 % v7 (old) | 01 / 2023 | Huawei MatePad SE SD 680, Adreno 610 | 440 g | 7.9 mm | 10.40" | 2000x1200 | |
82.9 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2021 | Realme Pad Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2 | 440 g | 6.9 mm | 10.40" | 2000x1200 | |
81.7 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2020 | Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020) SD 662, Adreno 610 | 477 g | 7 mm | 10.40" | 2000x1200 |
案例--明显的边缘
三星保持了与前代产品完全相同的金属外壳。但这是完全可以的:边框有一个合适的尺寸,使平板电脑看起来与时俱进,同时还能让你舒适地握住平板电脑,而不会意外地触发触摸屏。
在这一点上,市场上有一些更轻的10英寸平板电脑,但那些不会带来持续时间那么长的电池,而三星Galaxy Tab A7 2022的重量为477克(约1.05磅),拿在手里感觉很舒服。
显示屏和边框之间的材料过渡原来有点粗糙,你可以明显感觉到边缘,这稍微降低了对平板电脑质量的印象。但除此之外,Galaxy Tab显示出良好的做工,提供了稳定的结构。它只能最小限度地翘起,而且不会吱吱作响。
那些喜欢银色或金色版本的 A7 2020会感到失望,因为这款平板电脑的新版本只有深灰色和黑色显示屏边框。
设备 - 储存量少
微型SD卡读卡器
该读卡器支持存储量高达1TB的microSD卡。移动应用程序到卡上仍然不被支持,只允许你使用卡来存储媒体数据。
在使用我们的Angelbird V60参考卡的测试中,Galaxy Tab A7 2022的microSD读卡器表现出一流的水平,但无法充分利用快速存储卡的潜力。
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 (Angelbird V60) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 (Angelbird V60) | |
Huawei MatePad SE (Angelbird V60) | |
Realme Pad (Angelbird V60) |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
软件 --Android 12板载
通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 移动接收不强
随着三星Galaxy Tab A7的更新,你可以选择纯WiFi或LTE版本。我们测试的是三星Galaxy Tab A7 SM-T509,它也可以使用4G网来上网。它还支持电话。
移动通信调制解调器的频率覆盖范围没有变化,欧洲所有重要的4G频段都继续得到支持。在前往其他一些大洲时,将Galaxy Tab A7作为移动互联网设备使用应该也是可能的,但在全球使用时缺少几个频段。
在我们的随机定点测试中,移动接收效果相当平庸,无法与高端智能手机相比。
WiFi 5又被包括在内。在与我们的华硕ROG Rapture AXE11000参考路由器的测试中,Galaxy Tab A7 2022在接收数据时显示出一些良好的速度,但在发送数据时却落在竞争对手后面。
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Realme Pad | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020) | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Realme Pad | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020) | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 | |
Huawei MatePad SE | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Huawei MatePad SE | |
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 |
照相机 - 为一些图像伪影做准备
三星Galaxy Tab A7 2022的相机设备也依赖于前代产品的技术。背面同样有一个800万像素的摄像头,即使在良好的光线条件下,它在提供可用的照片方面也有一些明显的问题。尽管图像内容是可识别的,但它们看起来被洗掉了,而且有颗粒感。
在弱光条件下,一些图像伪影出现在黑暗区域,图像清晰度也进一步下降。虽然你可以用这台平板电脑拍快照或记录情况,但你不应该期待任何漂亮的照片。
主摄像头至少能够录制可用的视频吗?好吧,如果你不考虑抽风的自动对焦和略微冲淡的颜色,视频是可用的,特别是快速的亮度调整是令人信服的。
在平板电脑前面还有一个500万像素的摄像头。它创造的自拍是可用的,只要你不试图把它们放大太多。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Hauptkamera PflanzeHauptkamera UmgebungHauptkamera LowLight主摄像头即使在全棚照明下也会产生一些图像伪影,形成相当暗淡的照片。在1勒克斯的照明下,至少你仍然可以识别图像内容的轮廓。
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ae61b/ae61b9bf4ec993742ec45c2f153e5764d3aeead5" alt="ColorChecker"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9f481/9f4813ade4cf8f4606b1893e337299fa9927aa1f" alt="ColorChecker"
配件和保修 - 一个很好的选择
三星Galaxy Tab A7 2022的包装盒包括一个充电器、USB线和一个SIM卡工具。
随着该设备的高度普及,尽管其购买价格可以承受,但三星也提供了一些配件,如键盘盖,目前也相当实惠,约45欧元(约50美元)。你还可以得到一个包括设备支架的背面保护罩。此外,第三方供应商也为该平板电脑提供了许多盖子。
只要是在欧盟购买的设备,三星为其设备提供24个月的制造商保修。
输入设备和操作 - 可进行人脸识别
显示 - 不是最亮的那颗星Galaxy
|
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 322 cd/m²
Contrast: 716:1 (Black: 0.45 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.02 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.89
ΔE Greyscale 7.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
89% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.179
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 IPS, 2000x1200, 10.4" | Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1" | Huawei MatePad SE IPS, 2000x1200, 10.4" | Realme Pad IPS, 2000x1200, 10.4" | Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020) TFT-LCD, 2000x1200, 10.4" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 13% | 31% | 11% | 30% | |
Brightness middle | 322 | 343 7% | 398 24% | 426 32% | 365 13% |
Brightness | 303 | 332 10% | 368 21% | 429 42% | 337 11% |
Brightness Distribution | 89 | 94 6% | 87 -2% | 93 4% | 82 -8% |
Black Level * | 0.45 | 0.31 31% | 0.46 -2% | 0.47 -4% | 0.26 42% |
Contrast | 716 | 1106 54% | 865 21% | 906 27% | 1404 96% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 7.02 | 5.9 16% | 2.17 69% | 6.29 10% | 4.5 36% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.38 | 11.2 -8% | 4.32 58% | 10.97 -6% | 7.8 25% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 7.1 | 7.9 -11% | 3.1 56% | 8.3 -17% | 5.3 25% |
Gamma | 2.179 101% | 2.184 101% | 2.214 99% | 2.03 108% | 2.12 104% |
CCT | 8730 74% | 9198 71% | 7245 90% | 9057 72% | 7702 84% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8611 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
33.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17.3 ms rise | |
↘ 16.3 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 89 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
53.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 28.5 ms rise | |
↘ 23.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 89 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.7 ms). |
性能--经济实惠的平板电脑有很大的能量
Galaxy Tab A7的2022年版本的最大变化可能是SoC。三星改用Unisoc,这是一家中国制造商,其SoC在过去几年中被用于许多廉价的智能手机和平板电脑。
该Unisoc T618带来了两个性能和六个效率核心,每个核心的时钟速度高达2GHz。在与前代产品的直接比较中,性能差异很明显,但不是很剧烈,最多只有15%。Galaxy Tab A7 2022很容易就能跟上这个价格级别的其他平板电脑。
在日常操作中,Tab A7在滚动浏览菜单时运行平稳。然而,在要求较高的应用程序中,经常会出现停顿,而且可用的性能储备不是特别多。
Antutu v9 - Total Score | |
Average of class Tablet (92766 - 1286774, n=38, last 2 years) | |
Average UNISOC T618 (201310 - 240502, n=3) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 | |
Huawei MatePad SE | |
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 |
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 | |
Average of class Tablet (3195 - 20841, n=72, last 2 years) | |
Realme Pad | |
Average UNISOC T618 (7404 - 8414, n=5) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 | |
Huawei MatePad SE |
CrossMark - Overall | |
Average of class Tablet (172 - 1944, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Average UNISOC T618 (359 - 385, n=4) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 | |
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 | |
Huawei MatePad SE |
AImark - Score v3.x | |
Average of class Tablet (84 - 156427, n=49, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 | |
Average UNISOC T618 () | |
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 | |
Huawei MatePad SE |
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI | |
Average of class Tablet (2597 - 74821, n=55, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MatePad SE | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 | |
Average UNISOC T618 () | |
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 |
在图形性能方面,Galaxy Tab A7 2022显示自己的速度相当快,与竞争对手相比,能够在基准测试中取得这样或那样的优势。然而,我们也可以看到,它仍然是一个负担得起的设备,在考虑高要求的图形计算时,其设备总体上相当薄弱。
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | |
Realme Pad | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 | |
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 | |
Huawei MatePad SE |
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 | |
Realme Pad | |
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 | |
Huawei MatePad SE |
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 | |
Realme Pad | |
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 | |
Huawei MatePad SE | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020) |
3DMark / Wild Life Score | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 | |
Realme Pad | |
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 | |
Huawei MatePad SE | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020) |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 | |
Realme Pad | |
Huawei MatePad SE | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020) | |
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 | |
Realme Pad | |
Huawei MatePad SE | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020) | |
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 | |
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 | |
Realme Pad | |
Huawei MatePad SE | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020) |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 | |
Huawei MatePad SE | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020) | |
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 | |
Huawei MatePad SE | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020) | |
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 |
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 | |
Huawei MatePad SE | |
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020) |
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 | |
Huawei MatePad SE | |
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020) |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 | |
Huawei MatePad SE | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020) | |
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
Huawei MatePad SE | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020) | |
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 |
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 | |
Huawei MatePad SE | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020) | |
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 |
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 | |
Huawei MatePad SE | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020) | |
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 | |
Realme Pad | |
Huawei MatePad SE | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020) | |
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 | |
Realme Pad | |
Huawei MatePad SE | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020) | |
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 | |
Huawei MatePad SE | |
Realme Pad | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020) | |
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 | |
Huawei MatePad SE | |
Realme Pad | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020) | |
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 |
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 | |
Huawei MatePad SE | |
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 |
在网上冲浪时,这款平板电脑在其价格级别上取得了不错的成绩。尽管在滚动时你仍然需要等待内容,特别是图片,但那些不太急躁的人将能够使用Galaxy Tab A7 2022在浏览器中充分快速地移动。
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=67, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 (Chrome 112) | |
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 (Chrome 111) | |
Average UNISOC T618 (40.7 - 49.8, n=4) | |
Huawei MatePad SE (Huawei Browser 12) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020) (Chrome 86.0.4240.185) |
WebXPRT 4 - Overall | |
Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=66, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 (Chrome 112) | |
Average UNISOC T618 () | |
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 (Chrome 111) | |
Huawei MatePad SE (Huawei Browser 12) |
WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
Average of class Tablet (36 - 435, n=38, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 (Chrome 112) | |
Average UNISOC T618 (68 - 93, n=6) | |
Huawei MatePad SE (Huawei Browser 12) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020) (Chrome 86.0.4240.185) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 (Chome 112) | |
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 (Chome 111) | |
Average UNISOC T618 (32.9 - 38.2, n=4) | |
Huawei MatePad SE (Huawei Browser 12) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020) (Chrome 86.0.4240.185) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 (Chrome 112) | |
Average UNISOC T618 (10787 - 14722, n=6) | |
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 (Chrome 111) | |
Huawei MatePad SE (Huawei Browser 12) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020) (Chrome 86.0.4240.185) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020) (Chrome 86.0.4240.185) | |
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=73, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MatePad SE (Huawei Browser 12) | |
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 (Chrome 111) | |
Average UNISOC T618 (2762 - 3432, n=6) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 (Chrome 112) |
* ... smaller is better
蹩脚的eMMC闪存无法激发任何真正的热情,因为它延迟了数据传输和加载时间。Galaxy Tab A7 2022在这里显示自己特别慢。但是,由于这个价格级别的其他平板电脑没有提供快得多的存储,你可能只是在这一点上不能期望更多。
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 | Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 | Huawei MatePad SE | Realme Pad | Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020) | Average 32 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Tablet | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | 64% | 6% | 100% | 23% | -20% | 406% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 249 | 277.2 11% | 293.6 18% | 309 24% | 298 20% | 242 ? -3% | 1144 ? 359% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 83 | 210.4 153% | 99.5 20% | 211.4 155% | 89.9 8% | 100.5 ? 21% | 783 ? 843% |
Random Read 4KB | 67.3 | 105.1 56% | 61.8 -8% | 111.6 66% | 82 22% | 43.1 ? -36% | 194.6 ? 189% |
Random Write 4KB | 58.8 | 78.5 34% | 54 -8% | 150.2 155% | 83.6 42% | 22.3 ? -62% | 195.2 ? 232% |
游戏--《暗黑破坏神》中的图形错误
排放 - 这里唯一热的是声音
温度
这样一个10英寸的平板电脑提供了一个相对较大的内部空间,使SoC很容易被冷却。这在Galaxy Tab A7 2022中也很明显,它在温度发展方面没有任何问题。即使在长时间满负荷工作的情况下,该设备也只升温到难以察觉的33.8℃(92.8°F)。
在用3DMark进行的压力测试中,我们也可以看到,在较长时间的运行中,性能并没有受到影响。
3DMark Wild Life Stress Test
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 32.9 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.7 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 29.9 °C / 86 F.
发言人
这款经济实惠的平板电脑带来了四个扬声器,在这个价格级别上几乎没有任何制造商能够提供。这也使得它能够实现柔和的立体声效果,即使扬声器之间的距离当然相对较小。
声音是强大的。虽然它在全音量时略微强调了高音,但总体来说还是相当不错的。声音可以听得很清楚,音乐听起来也很干净。
然而,HiFi爱好者仍会喜欢使用耳机或外部扬声器,可以通过3.5毫米音频端口或蓝牙5.0连接。支持的无线蓝牙编解码器的选择是相当少的。有SBC、AAC、aptX、LDAC和三星自己的SSC,支持最必要的编解码器,但不超过这些。
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 46% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020) audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 31% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
电源管理--Galaxy Tab A7的高效运行
消耗功率
与上一代产品相比,三星Galaxy Tab A7 2022的效率明显提高,也明显超过了这个价格级别的其他平板电脑。特别是在没有任何负载的情况下,其耗电量非常低。
使用7.8瓦的充电器,需要长达4:30小时,直到大电池完全充电。这一点特别令人恼火,因为这款平板电脑还可以用高达15瓦的功率充电,但三星只提供了一个太弱的充电器。
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 7040 mAh | Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 5100 mAh | Huawei MatePad SE 5100 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020) 7040 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -35% | -34% | -84% | |
Idle Minimum * | 1.4 | 1.9 -36% | 1.5 -7% | 1.18 16% |
Idle Average * | 1.6 | 2.1 -31% | 2.3 -44% | 4.92 -208% |
Idle Maximum * | 2 | 2.5 -25% | 2.8 -40% | 4.95 -148% |
Load Average * | 4.2 | 7.6 -81% | 6.5 -55% | 7.21 -72% |
Load Maximum * | 8.7 | 9 -3% | 10.7 -23% | 9.32 -7% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)
电池寿命
我们的测试装置能够很好地利用其效率,也实现了良好的电池寿命:在我们的WLAN测试中,强大的7,040毫安时电池可持续14:34小时。
负载下的电池寿命也是令人信服的:在不得不再次充电之前,你可以玩长达4:10小时的游戏。
有趣的是,前代产品在空闲状态下的电池寿命甚至更长,所以我们目前的模型仍然有一些优化的需要。 但考虑到罕见的更新,你在这方面不应该有太多的希望。
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 7040 mAh | Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 5100 mAh | Huawei MatePad SE 5100 mAh | Realme Pad 7100 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020) 7040 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -11% | -14% | -3% | -7% | |
Reader / Idle | 2869 | 1952 -32% | 2009 -30% | 3192 11% | |
H.264 | 942 | 1002 6% | 958 2% | 745 -21% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 874 | 861 -1% | 638 -27% | 847 -3% | 757 -13% |
Load | 250 | 213 -15% | 249 0% | 235 -6% |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 光和影在Galaxy Tab A7 2022
三星Galaxy Tab A7 2022提供了一些特殊的功能,使其成为经济型平板电脑中的一个好选择。例如,它的四个扬声器能产生令人信服的声音。此外,这款平板电脑在负载情况下几乎不发热,为其价格等级带来了良好的性能值,运行效率高,而且电池可以持续很长时间。
另一方面,也有一些地方不太令人信服。首先是相机,即使对平板电脑来说,它的照片质量也非常有限,包括一些图像伪影。屏幕也非常暗,色彩再现有一种冷色调。此外,存储设备也不是最新的了。
因此,这取决于你想用Galaxy Tab A7 2022,以及什么对你来说是重要的。那些正在寻找一个坚实的伴侣,特别是在室内,以及那些只安装很少的应用程序和不关心相机的人,将以很少的钱得到一个坚实的平板。
三星Galaxy Tab A7 2022是一款经典产品的温和更新,电池寿命良好。然而,你不应该太在意好的相机或明亮的屏幕。
在这一点上,你可以从竞争对手那里得到更多的存储空间,比如说 realme Pad,它也能从四个扬声器产生声音,或 联想Tab M10 2022或者联想Tab M10 2022,它能够以良好的无线网络接收来说服我们。
价格和可用性
带有Unisoc处理器的三星Galaxy Tab A7的2022年更新版似乎在美国、英国或印度无法买到。在美国,只有非常相似的Galaxy Tab A8配备了Unisoc处理器,例如在亚马逊从179美元起售。
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022
- 05/03/2023 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.