Notebookcheck Logo

Getac S410第4代笔记本电脑回顾。简单的变化，巨大的升级

卓越的CPU和GPU性能。

英特尔的Tiger Lake-U系列已经为消费者的笔记本电脑创造了奇迹，因此，很高兴终于看到在为企业或工业用途设计的坚固耐用的型号上有同样的选择。
Laptop / Notebook Tiger Lake Business
(图片来源：Getac)
(图片来源：Getac)

Getac S410第4代是现有第3代和早期机型的第11代英特尔Tiger Lake-U更新。它在其他方面与前辈分享相同的机箱设计，因此我们，现有的关于原始2018年S410模型的评论 ，在这里仍然适用。

我们的具体审查单位是一个更高端的配置，配备了酷睿i7-1185U CPU和1000尼特的IPS触摸屏。较低端的SKU可在下面的官方规格表中详细说明。关于G410系列的更多信息可以在其产品页面这里 。

更多Getac评论。

S410第4代规格
S410第4代规格
(来源：Getac)
(来源：Getac)
Getac S410 Gen 4 (S Series)
Processor
Intel Core i7-1185G7 4 x 3 - 4.8 GHz, 41 W PL2 / Short Burst, 26 W PL1 / Sustained, Tiger Lake-UP3
Graphics adapter
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Core: 1350 MHz, RAM: 2000 MHz, DDR4, 27.20.100.9126
Memory
16 GB 
, DDR4-3200, 22-22-22-52. Dual-Channel
Display
14.00 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 157 PPI, Capacitive, AU Optronics AUO413D, IPS, glossy: no, 60 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Tiger Lake-UP3 PCH-LP
Storage
SSSTC CA5-8D256, 256 GB 
Soundcard
Intel Tiger Lake-U/Y PCH-LP - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
1 USB 2.0, 4 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, 1 Docking Station Port, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm combo
Networking
Intel Ethernet Connection I219-LM (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 34.9 x 350 x 293
Battery
194 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Additional features
Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, G-Manager, 36 Months Warranty, ruggedized
Weight
3.211 kg, Power Supply: 473 g
Links
Getac homepage
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
81.7 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2022
Getac S410 Gen 4
i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs		3.2 kg34.9 mm14.00"1920x1080
83.9 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2021
Panasonic Toughbook FZ-55 MK2
i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs		2.3 kg33 mm14.00"1920x1080
81.9 %
v6 (old)
Getac S410
i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620		3.2 kg34.9 mm14.00"1366x768
89.2 %
v6 (old)
Dell Latitude 5420 Rugged-P85G
i7-8650U, Radeon RX 540		2.8 kg32.9 mm14.00"1920x1080
82.4 %
v7 (old)
12 / 2021
Acer Enduro Urban N3 EUN314
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs		1.8 kg21.95 mm14.00"1920x1080

v (old)
09 / 2021
Durabook S14I
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs		3 kg38.1 mm14.00"1920x1080

案例

尺寸比较

❌
350 mm 282 mm 38.1 mm 3 kg350 mm 293 mm 34.9 mm 3.2 kg350 mm 293 mm 34.9 mm 3.2 kg321 mm 212 mm 20.9 mm 1.5 kg320 mm 234.2 mm 18.9 mm 1.4 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

沟通

WLAN已经从英特尔8265升级到AX201，以兼容Wi-Fi 6。根据我们的测试，现实世界的传输速率至少快了两倍。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Asus ExpertBook B7 Flip B7402FEA
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1407 (1330min - 1504max) MBit/s +29%
Getac B360
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1094 (1015min - 1156max) MBit/s +1%
Getac S410 Gen 4
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1088 (954min - 1156max) MBit/s
Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
857 (573min - 993max) MBit/s -21%
MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-009
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
640 (573min - 691max) MBit/s -41%
Getac S410
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
538 MBit/s -51%
Infinix INBook X2
Wireless AC-9461
351 (280min - 434max) MBit/s -68%
iperf3 receive AX12
Asus ExpertBook B7 Flip B7402FEA
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1579 (1514min - 1675max) MBit/s +12%
Getac S410 Gen 4
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1414 (1346min - 1476max) MBit/s
Getac B360
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1393 (1303min - 1460max) MBit/s -1%
Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1328 (671min - 1493max) MBit/s -6%
MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-009
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
787 (678min - 865max) MBit/s -44%
Getac S410
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
650 MBit/s -54%
Infinix INBook X2
Wireless AC-9461
356 (180min - 359max) MBit/s -75%
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450Tooltip
Getac S410 Gen 4; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1413 (1346-1476)
Getac S410 Gen 4; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1088 (954-1156)

网络摄像头

720p的网络摄像头仍然没有变化。如果能升级到1080p，以获得更清晰的画面，那就太好了。

ColorChecker
3.6 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
5 ∆E
16.2 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
3 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Getac S410 Gen 4: 7.52 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 16.18 ∆E

显示

与我们最初的2018年S410 Gen 1上的250-nit 768p TN面板相比，1000-nit 1080p IPS面板是一个重大升级。 对比度甚至翻了一番，但色彩空间几乎没有变化。

请记住，脉宽调制存在于所有亮度水平上，即使是在最大亮度时。持续的屏幕闪烁可能会对一小部分眼睛敏感的用户造成困扰。

由于厚厚的触摸屏层，子像素明显比光面的替代品更有颗粒感。
由于厚厚的触摸屏层，子像素明显比光面的替代品更有颗粒感。
背光严重不均匀出血
背光严重不均匀出血
1017
cd/m²		1073.1
cd/m²		966.9
cd/m²
1033.1
cd/m²		956.9
cd/m²		929.3
cd/m²
1064
cd/m²		913
cd/m²		899.6
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
AU Optronics AUO413D tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 1073.1 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 983.7 cd/m² Minimum: 2.34 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 84 %
Center on Battery: 956.9 cd/m²
Contrast: 1181:1 (Black: 0.81 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.86, calibrated: 4.05
ΔE Greyscale 6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
39.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
57.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
38.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.19
Getac S410 Gen 4
AU Optronics AUO413D, IPS, 1920x1080, 14"		Panasonic Toughbook FZ-55 MK2
InfoVision M140NWF5 R3, IPS, 1920x1080, 14"		Getac S410
CMN N140BGE-E33, TN PED, 1366x768, 14"		Dell Latitude 5420 Rugged-P85G
AU Optronics AUO523D, IPS, 1920x1080, 14"		Acer Enduro Urban N3 EUN314
XR140EA6T, IPS, 1920x1080, 14"		Durabook S14I
KD140N0730A01, TN, 1920x1080, 14"
Display
-9%
6%
63%
64%
14%
Display P3 Coverage
38.3
34.8
-9%
40.46
6%
62.5
63%
63.5
66%
43.55
14%
sRGB Coverage
57.2
52.2
-9%
60.9
6%
92.4
62%
91.9
61%
65.4
14%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
39.5
36
-9%
41.8
6%
64.2
63%
65.5
66%
45
14%
Response Times
1%
13%
-39%
-19%
4%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
35.2 ?(17.6, 17.6)
28.4 ?(14, 14.4)
19%
41.2 ?(21.6, 19.6)
-17%
68 ?(34, 34)
-93%
56 ?(25.2, 30.8)
-59%
30.4 ?(16.8, 13.6)
14%
Response Time Black / White *
31.2 ?(19.2, 12)
30 ?(16, 14)
4%
14 ?(9.6, 4.4)
55%
33.6 ?(18.8, 14.8)
-8%
35.2 ?(16.4, 18.8)
-13%
11.8 ?(8.2, 3.6)
62%
PWM Frequency
870 ?(100)
685 ?(99)
-21%
877 ?(99)
1%
735 ?(100)
-16%
1000 ?(99)
15%
304.9 ?(100)
-65%
Screen
19%
-50%
19%
1%
-42%
Brightness middle
956.9
1061.1
11%
265.1
-72%
1111.7
16%
487.8
-49%
1180.7
23%
Brightness
984
997
1%
246
-75%
1026
4%
464
-53%
1102
12%
Brightness Distribution
84
76
-10%
81
-4%
80
-5%
89
6%
89
6%
Black Level *
0.81
0.7
14%
0.58
28%
0.81
-0%
0.48
41%
1.91
-136%
Contrast
1181
1516
28%
457
-61%
1372
16%
1016
-14%
618
-48%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
6.6
4.64
30%
14.24
-116%
3.83
42%
6.51
1%
13.45
-104%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
22.94
20.92
9%
26.66
-16%
7.85
66%
11.36
50%
22.52
2%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
4.05
2.52
38%
3.94
3%
2.98
26%
1.77
56%
3.19
21%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
6
2.8
53%
14.2
-137%
5.6
7%
7.8
-30%
15.4
-157%
Gamma
2.19 100%
2.08 106%
2.03 108%
2.306 95%
2.28 96%
1.97 112%
CCT
7276 89%
6364 102%
17152 38%
7676 85%
8102 80%
21134 31%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
38.7
59
41.6
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
61
93
65.5
Total Average (Program / Settings)
4% / 10%
-10% / -26%
14% / 16%
15% / 10%
-8% / -22%

* ... smaller is better

色彩空间只限于sRGB的57%，而许多消费类超极本的色彩空间超过90%。这个系统毕竟不是为专业图形编辑设计的。

vs. sRGB
vs. sRGB
vs. DCI-P3
vs. DCI-P3

色温过低，这在色彩范围很窄的面板上很常见。即使在用我们自己的X-Rite色度计进行校准后，平均DeltaE值也没有明显改善。

校准前的灰度
校准前的灰度
校准前的饱和扫频
校准前的饱和扫频
校准前的ColorChecker
校准前的ColorChecker
校准后的灰度
校准后的灰度
校准后的饱和扫频
校准后的饱和扫频
校准后的ColorChecker
校准后的ColorChecker

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
31.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19.2 ms rise
↘ 12 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 83 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.7 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
35.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17.6 ms rise
↘ 17.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 46 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.4 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 870 Hz ≤ 100 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 870 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 870 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8482 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

户外能见度很好，特别是在阴凉处。尽管如此，确实存在更明亮的显示屏，如在 戴尔Latitude 7330 Rugged Extreme和它的1400尼特面板。

在户外的阴凉处
在户外的阴凉处
阳光下的室外
阳光下的室外
在户外的阴凉处
在户外的阴凉处
宽广的IPS可视角度
宽广的IPS可视角度

业绩

 
 

测试条件

在运行以下任何性能基准测试之前，我们的设备通过G-Manager软件被设置为极限功率计划，以获得可能的最高分数。我们建议用户熟悉这个软件，因为关键功能和更新是在这里切换的。

处理器

原始单线程和多线程性能分别比原来S410的Core i7-8550U快30%和50%。选择较小的酷睿i5-1135G7或酷睿i5-1145G7，预计只会对处理器性能产生约10%至15%的影响。

Cinebench R15 Multi Loop

050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900Tooltip
Getac S410 Gen 4 Intel Core i7-1185G7: Ø782 (745.67-787.01)
Acer Enduro Urban N3 EUN314 Intel Core i7-1165G7: Ø807 (480.95-841.33)
Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W Intel Core i5-1135G7: Ø836 (755.62-919.65)
Panasonic Toughbook FZ-55 MK2 Intel Core i7-1185G7: Ø807 (789.97-811.61)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad L15 G2 AMD
AMD Ryzen 5 5600U
1272 (1234.26min - 1271.74max) Points +62%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-43-R8BP
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
1169 (1150.91min - 1168.84max) Points +49%
MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-009
Intel Core i7-10710U
1100 Points +40%
Asus ExpertBook B7 Flip B7402FEA
Intel Core i7-1195G7
985 Points +25%
Average Intel Core i7-1185G7
  (617 - 1066, n=32)
859 Points +9%
Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W
Intel Core i5-1135G7
851 (743.99min - 851.23max) Points +8%
Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH
Intel Core i5-1145G7
792 (583.12min - 791.56max) Points +1%
Getac S410 Gen 4
Intel Core i7-1185G7
787 (745.67min - 787.01max) Points
Getac B360
Intel Core i7-10710U
665 (654.44min - 664.93max) Points -16%
Dell Latitude 5320-TM4V2
Intel Core i5-1135G7
661 (645.52min - 661.35max) Points -16%
Infinix INBook X2
Intel Core i7-1065G7
570 (483.75min - 569.97max) Points -28%
Getac S410
Intel Core i7-8550U
539 Points -32%
BMAX X14 Pro
AMD Ryzen 5 3450U
530 (516.78min - 529.72max) Points -33%
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
787 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
95.2 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
211 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
1973 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
542 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
1408 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
5119 Points
Help
Performance Rating: Percent
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating
Asus ExpertBook B7 Flip B7402FEA
Intel Core i7-1195G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
89.7 pt
Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
88.2 pt
Average Intel Core i7-1185G7
 
85.6 pt
Getac S410 Gen 4
Intel Core i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
79.2 pt
Getac B360
Intel Core i7-10710U, UHD Graphics 620
71 pt
Infinix INBook X2
Intel Core i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
68.1 pt

系统性能

PCMark的结果比我们在S410 Gen 1上观察到的要高，除了生产力分测试，可能是由于我们的设备上的SSD性能比预期的要慢，如下面的章节中所示。由于Iris Xe的性能优于更老的UHD Graphics 620，最大的收益可以在数字内容创作分测试中看到。

PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score
Asus ExpertBook B7 Flip B7402FEA
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1195G7, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5250 Points +10%
MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-009
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-10710U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
5150 Points +8%
Average Intel Core i7-1185G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (4746 - 5561, n=20)
5000 Points +5%
Getac S410 Gen 4
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, SSSTC CA5-8D256
4757 Points
Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, WDC PC SN530 SDBPTPZ-256G
4592 Points -3%
Infinix INBook X2
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Foresee GSYAPGC-512G
4291 Points -10%
Getac B360
UHD Graphics 620, i7-10710U, Lite-On CA5-8D512
4286 Points -10%
Getac S410
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, CUKUSA 1 TB SATA SSD Q0526A
3958 Points -17%
PCMark 10 Score
4757 points
Help
AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Average Intel Core i7-1185G7
  (36515 - 68450, n=20)
54182 MB/s +46%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-43-R8BP
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, Vega 7
40547 MB/s +10%
Infinix INBook X2
Intel Core i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
39106 MB/s +6%
Getac S410 Gen 4
Intel Core i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
36986 MB/s
Getac B360
Intel Core i7-10710U, UHD Graphics 620
34970 MB/s -5%
Asus ExpertBook B7 Flip B7402FEA
Intel Core i7-1195G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
24369 MB/s -34%
BMAX X14 Pro
AMD Ryzen 5 3450U, Vega 8
23860 MB/s -35%
Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
19632 MB/s -47%

* ... smaller is better

DPC延时

LatencyMon显示了在打开我们的主页的多个浏览器标签时的DPC问题。在60 FPS的情况下，4K视频播放很流畅，没有任何掉帧。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, WDC PC SN530 SDBPTPZ-256G
5906 μs * -191%
BMAX X14 Pro
Vega 8, R5 3450U, SEAPIY E535N 512GB
3255 μs * -61%
Getac S410 Gen 4
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, SSSTC CA5-8D256
2027 μs *
Asus ExpertBook B7 Flip B7402FEA
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1195G7, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1025 μs * +49%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-43-R8BP
Vega 7, R5 5500U, Kingston OM8PDP3512B-AI1
904 μs * +55%
Getac B360
UHD Graphics 620, i7-10710U, Lite-On CA5-8D512
795 μs * +61%
Infinix INBook X2
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Foresee GSYAPGC-512G
750 μs * +63%

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

我们的设备配备了一个256GB SSSTC CA5 M.2 2280 PCIe3 x4固态硬盘宣传的连续读取和写入速率分别为3200MB/s和1600MB/s。然而，在我们的设备上，我们能够毫无问题地达到最大的写入率，而连续写入率会异常缓慢，尽管多次重新运行，仍在580MB/s左右。

AS SSD
AS SSD
CDM 8
CDM 8
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
DiskSpd
hddimg
SSSTC CA5-8D256
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3409 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 652 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 329.2 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 299.1 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2233 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 805 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 53.7 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 112.1 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Asus ExpertBook B7 Flip B7402FEA
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
99.2 pt
MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-009 -8!
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
75.2 pt
Getac B360
Lite-On CA5-8D512
63.3 pt
Infinix INBook X2
Foresee GSYAPGC-512G
52.4 pt
Acer Swift 3 SF314-43-R8BP
Kingston OM8PDP3512B-AI1
45.4 pt
Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W
WDC PC SN530 SDBPTPZ-256G
44.3 pt
Getac S410 Gen 4
SSSTC CA5-8D256
38.5 pt
Getac S410 -8!
CUKUSA 1 TB SATA SSD Q0526A
34.5 pt
BMAX X14 Pro
SEAPIY E535N 512GB
23.1 pt

* ... smaller is better

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

017034051068085010201190136015301700187020402210238025502720289030603230Tooltip
Getac S410 Gen 4: Ø3339 (3163.55-3360.7)

GPU性能

图形性能非常好，相对于其他具有相同集成度的笔记本电脑来说，我们期望它能达到这样的性能。 Iris Xe 96 EUsGPU。选择较小的 Iris Xe 80 EUs配置，根据我们的使用时间，应该只会慢10%左右。戴尔Latitude 7420.在这两种情况下，S410第四代的图形性能可以提供超过3倍于老式的 UHD Graphics 620在S410第1代上发现。

3DMark 11
3DMark 11
Cloud Gate
Cloud Gate
Time Spy
Time Spy
Fire Strike
Fire Strike
Fire Strike 超强
Fire Strike 超强
 
3DMark 11 | 3DMark
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-009
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10710U
10248 Points +55%
Getac S410 Gen 4
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1185G7
6613 Points
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (2867 - 7676, n=205)
6365 Points -4%
Asus ExpertBook B7 Flip B7402FEA
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1195G7
5845 Points -12%
Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1145G7
5737 Points -13%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-43-R8BP
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
5563 Points -16%
Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1135G7
3997 Points -40%
Infinix INBook X2
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Intel Core i7-1065G7
3968 Points -40%
BMAX X14 Pro
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), AMD Ryzen 5 3450U
3692 Points -44%
Getac B360
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-10710U
1913 Points -71%
Getac S410
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8550U
1766 Points -73%
3DMark 11 Performance
6824 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
18313 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
4294 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
1630 points
Help
The Witcher 3 | GTA V | Dota 2 Reborn | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | X-Plane 11.11 | Strange Brigade
The Witcher 3
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (28.9 - 117.2, n=187)
83.9 fps +9%
Getac S410 Gen 4
Intel Core i7-1185G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
77.3 (9min) fps
Asus ExpertBook B7 Flip B7402FEA
Intel Core i7-1195G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
62.4 (3.64min, 29.5P0.1, 42P1) fps -19%
Infinix INBook X2
Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
54 (16min) fps -30%
BMAX X14 Pro
AMD Ryzen 5 3450U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
41.9 (32min) fps -46%
Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
38.8 fps -50%
Getac B360
Intel Core i7-10710U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
20.7 fps -73%
1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (21.4 - 77.8, n=185)
53.6 fps +9%
Getac S410 Gen 4
Intel Core i7-1185G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
49.4 (46min) fps
Asus ExpertBook B7 Flip B7402FEA
Intel Core i7-1195G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
39.9 (19min, 22.3P0.1, 26.3P1) fps -19%
Infinix INBook X2
Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
34.7 (30min) fps -30%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-43-R8BP
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
34.7 fps -30%
BMAX X14 Pro
AMD Ryzen 5 3450U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
27.9 (26min) fps -44%
Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
24.4 fps -51%
Getac B360
Intel Core i7-10710U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
14.3 (11min) fps -71%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (10.6 - 45.9, n=190)
28.8 fps +13%
Getac S410 Gen 4
Intel Core i7-1185G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
25.6 (23min) fps
Asus ExpertBook B7 Flip B7402FEA
Intel Core i7-1195G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
18.7 (10.3min, 10.3P0.1, 12P1) fps -27%
Infinix INBook X2
Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
18.5 (15min) fps -28%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-43-R8BP
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
17.4 fps -32%
BMAX X14 Pro
AMD Ryzen 5 3450U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
13.9 (12min) fps -46%
Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
9.3 fps -64%
Getac B360
Intel Core i7-10710U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
8.4 (5min) fps -67%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (8.79 - 20.1, n=180)
14 fps +9%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-43-R8BP
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
13 fps +1%
Getac S410 Gen 4
Intel Core i7-1185G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
12.9 (11min) fps
Asus ExpertBook B7 Flip B7402FEA
Intel Core i7-1195G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
10.7 (3.8min, 5.12P0.1, 7.71P1) fps -17%
Infinix INBook X2
Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
9.4 (6min) fps -27%
BMAX X14 Pro
AMD Ryzen 5 3450U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
8.9 (8min) fps -31%
Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
7 fps -46%
Getac B360
Intel Core i7-10710U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
4.8 (3min) fps -63%

Witcher 3 FPS Chart

051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
Getac S410 Gen 4: Ø87.4 (77-93)
lowmed.highultra
GTA V (2015) 78.7 65.6 18.9 8.04
The Witcher 3 (2015) 77.3 49.4 25.6 12.9
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 83.1 67.7 48 45.7
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 39.4 20.1 15.3
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 44.4 33.9 30.9
Strange Brigade (2018) 79.2 31.5 26.8 22

排放

系统噪音

与原来的S410第一代机型相比，风扇噪音似乎更响，更容易出现脉冲。此外，在运行高要求的负载时，内部风扇很快达到最大转速，这意味着脉冲是陡峭和非常明显的。我们建议在较低的功率曲线下运行系统，以减少风扇的脉动。

风扇噪音曲线（白色。背景，红色。系统空闲，蓝色：3DMark 06，橙色。Witcher 3，绿色。Prime95压力)
风扇噪音曲线（白色。背景，红色。系统空闲，蓝色：3DMark 06，橙色。Witcher 3，绿色。Prime95压力)

Noise Level

Idle
23.5 / 23.5 / 28 dB(A)
Load
42.8 / 42.6 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 23.3 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.836.536.63230.8252630.529.622.824.53125.526.523.421.521.64025.822.92423.221.65023.522.321.319.124.36320.122.720.117.832802324.320.621.222.210020.720.918.518.52112521.722.316.114.823.116020.920.813.813.721.420022.523.214.914.522.125026.42513.814.326.331528.527.914.617.328.140031.332.213.114.230.950035.733.812.112.7376303130.711.211.43180031.532101031100031.731.910.49.731.8125032.435.510.39.732.7160030.33110.11031.5200029.829.810.310.131.2250030.831.510.510.531.6315028.427.811.110.927.7400032.431.711.411.231.5500027.927.311.811.527.163002726.91211.725.3800021.320.512.111.719.61000017.116.211.911.515.91250015.313.612.111.5131600013.41311.710.911.8SPL42.342.823.423.342.6N4.14.10.50.54.1median 28.4median 27.8median 11.9median 11.5median 27.7Delta5.15.51.725.2hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseGetac S410 Gen 4
Getac S410 Gen 4
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, SSSTC CA5-8D256		Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, WDC PC SN530 SDBPTPZ-256G		Getac B360
UHD Graphics 620, i7-10710U, Lite-On CA5-8D512		Getac S410
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, CUKUSA 1 TB SATA SSD Q0526A		Durabook S14I
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, UDinfo M2P M2P80DE512GBAEP
Noise
-3%
13%
-2%
-2%
off / environment *
23.3
25
-7%
24.3
-4%
28.4
-22%
25.2
-8%
Idle Minimum *
23.5
25
-6%
24.5
-4%
28.4
-21%
25.2
-7%
Idle Average *
23.5
25
-6%
24.5
-4%
28.4
-21%
25.2
-7%
Idle Maximum *
28
25
11%
24.6
12%
28.4
-1%
34.5
-23%
Load Average *
42.8
36.5
15%
29.8
30%
30.3
29%
34.5
19%
Witcher 3 ultra *
42.3
27.3
35%
Load Maximum *
42.6
52.4
-23%
30.8
28%
33.3
22%
36.2
15%

* ... smaller is better

温度

由于处理器和冷却解决方案在机箱内部的位置，机箱右半部分的表面温度比左半部分的温度最高。热点在顶部和底部两侧分别可以达到35摄氏度和46摄氏度，尽管它们是在系统的后部，皮肤不太可能接触到。

后排气管
后排气管
交流适配器在一小时的极端处理负荷后达到40C
交流适配器在一小时的极端处理负荷后达到40C
Max. Load
 21 °C29.2 °C36 °C 
 19.8 °C23.4 °C24.8 °C 
 20.4 °C21 °C21 °C 
Maximum: 36 °C
Average: 24.1 °C
46.8 °C29.2 °C21 °C
38.6 °C37 °C21.6 °C
22 °C21.8 °C21.6 °C
Maximum: 46.8 °C
Average: 28.8 °C
Power Supply (max.)  40 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 24.1 °C / 75 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.8 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.2 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 24 °C / 75.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (+3.6 °C / 6.5 F).
系统空闲（顶部）
系统空闲（顶部）
系统闲置（底部）
系统闲置（底部）
Prime95+FurMark的压力（顶）。
Prime95+FurMark的压力（顶）。
Prime95+FurMark的压力（底部）。
Prime95+FurMark的压力（底部）。
Getac S410 Gen 4
Intel Core i7-1185G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs		Panasonic Toughbook FZ-55 MK2
Intel Core i7-1185G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs		Getac S410
Intel Core i7-8550U, Intel UHD Graphics 620		Dell Latitude 5420 Rugged-P85G
Intel Core i7-8650U, AMD Radeon RX 540		Acer Enduro Urban N3 EUN314
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs		Durabook S14I
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Heat
4%
-4%
1%
8%
5%
Maximum Upper Side *
36
36.2
-1%
42.6
-18%
42.2
-17%
37.8
-5%
36.4
-1%
Maximum Bottom *
46.8
42.2
10%
49
-5%
42
10%
45.8
2%
38.6
18%
Idle Upper Side *
30
31
-3%
30.8
-3%
31.6
-5%
26.4
12%
32.6
-9%
Idle Bottom *
38.2
34
11%
34.4
10%
31.8
17%
30.2
21%
33.8
12%

* ... smaller is better

压力测试

当运行Prime95时，CPU时钟速率会在很短的时间内提升到2.9GHz，然后迅速下降并稳定在2.4GHz。在测试开始时，CPU的封装功率将高达41W，然后稳定在26W。95C的高核心温度表明，在承受苛刻的处理负载时，CPU在机箱的限制范围内尽可能快地运行。相比之下，S410 Gen 1和戴尔Latitude 7330 Rugged的CPU在承受相同条件时，将分别稳定在较低的80 C和62 C。

系统空闲
系统空闲
Witcher 3 压力
Witcher 3 压力
Prime95压力
Prime95压力
Prime95+FurMark压力
Prime95+FurMark压力
CPU时钟（GHz） GPU时钟（MHz） CPU平均温度（°C）
系统空闲 -- -- 55
Prime95压力 2.3 - 2.4 - 95
Prime95 + FurMark 压力 1.4 - 1.6 1000 96
Witcher 3 应力 1.2 - 1.4 1350 95

发言人

在最大音量下有粉红噪音。虽然范围是预期的有限，但内部的扬声器可以更响亮。
在最大音量下有粉红噪音。虽然范围是预期的有限，但内部的扬声器可以更响亮。
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.936.632.92524.729.624.73121.923.421.94024.62424.6502421.3246331.120.131.18020.620.620.610017.418.517.412520.516.120.516022.713.822.720030.614.930.625042.313.842.331553.414.653.440054.613.154.650055.212.155.263060.111.260.180064.31064.3100073.210.473.2125077.710.377.7160071.710.171.7200064.310.364.3250066.110.566.1315064.711.164.7400060.311.460.350006311.8636300651265800063.512.163.51000068.511.968.51250072.812.172.81600066.411.766.4SPL81.723.481.7N450.545median 63.5median 11.9median 63.5Delta9.41.79.426.325.821.422.12624.925.127.622.532.523.448.72655.818.860.922.167.2267019.372.317.674.217.774.319.575.31571.711.871.311.27410.574.21072.710.17210.67210.97511.374.811.671.71269.71269.612.371.112.669.61270.111.269.824.784.70.666.6median 12median 71.73.42.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseGetac S410 Gen 4Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Getac S410 Gen 4 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 69% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 71% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

能源管理

消耗功率

该系统配备了一个小的（约12.8 x 5.2 x 3.0厘米）和相对较高容量的90 W交流适配器，而S410 Gen 1和其他大多数14英寸超极本的交流适配器则是65 W。更高的容量基本上 "解锁 "了CPU，因此它可以在潜在的更高的TDP目标下运行，从而以更高的时钟速率超越许多使用相同处理器的其他笔记本电脑。如果连接不同的Thunderbolt兼容的配件，更高的功率输出也可以派上用场，并且无论屏幕上的活动如何，都可以保持稳定的充电率。

对于一个14英寸的外形尺寸来说，功耗是很高的。桌面上的闲置功率在8W到15W之间，比预期的要求高两倍，部分原因是超亮的显示屏。同时，运行更高的负载，如游戏，将消耗约50W，而旧的S410 Gen 1的功耗约为33W。

3DMark 06的耗电量
3DMark 06的耗电量
Witcher 3 108p 超级设置功耗
Witcher 3 108p 超级设置功耗
由于热能的限制，消耗量会在一瞬间飙升到73瓦，然后下降并稳定在49瓦。
由于热能的限制，消耗量会在一瞬间飙升到73瓦，然后下降并稳定在49瓦。
同时启动Prime95+FurMark会导致消耗量激增到90W
同时启动Prime95+FurMark会导致消耗量激增到90W
Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.34 / 6 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 8.3 / 10.5 / 14.9 Watt
Load midlight 48.6 / 90.1 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Getac S410 Gen 4
i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, SSSTC CA5-8D256, IPS, 1920x1080, 14"		Asus ExpertBook B7 Flip B7402FEA
i7-1195G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 1900x1200, 14"		Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W
i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, WDC PC SN530 SDBPTPZ-256G, IPS, 1920x1080, 14"		Getac B360
i7-10710U, UHD Graphics 620, Lite-On CA5-8D512, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3"		Getac S410
i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, CUKUSA 1 TB SATA SSD Q0526A, TN PED, 1366x768, 14"		Durabook S14I
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, UDinfo M2P M2P80DE512GBAEP, TN, 1920x1080, 14"
Power Consumption
40%
36%
15%
39%
-3%
Idle Minimum *
8.3
3.2
61%
3.4
59%
5.4
35%
5.6
33%
6.8
18%
Idle Average *
10.5
6.3
40%
7.1
32%
12.2
-16%
7.9
25%
16.4
-56%
Idle Maximum *
14.9
7.5
50%
8.4
44%
12.6
15%
8.4
44%
16.9
-13%
Load Average *
48.6
35
28%
35.3
27%
39.1
20%
32.8
33%
39.2
19%
Witcher 3 ultra *
50.9
35.4
30%
35.4
30%
36.5
28%
Load Maximum *
90.1
63
30%
67
26%
81.8
9%
34.3
62%
73.1
19%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest

051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
Getac S410 Gen 4; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø50.9 (47.7-58.8)
Getac S410 Gen 4; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø54.2 (49-90.1)

Power Consumption external Monitor

0510152025303540455055606570Tooltip
Getac S410 Gen 4; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø51.9 (48.7-73.1)
Getac S410 Gen 4; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø52.3 (49.1-68)
Getac S410 Gen 4; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø47.5 (44.4-56.3)
Getac S410 Gen 4; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø44.8 (41.5-59.9)

电池寿命

该模型可以同时支持多个电池。我们的特定装置集成了一个44Wh的内部电池，加上两个各75Wh的可移动电池，总共有194Wh。可移动电池通过机箱边缘的对接槽安装。我们能够记录到所有三块电池的实际WLAN运行时间超过28小时。

该系统不能通过USB-C充电。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
28h 35min
Getac S410 Gen 4
i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 194 Wh		Asus ExpertBook B7 Flip B7402FEA
i7-1195G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 63 Wh		Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W
i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 63 Wh		Getac B360
i7-10710U, UHD Graphics 620, 46 Wh		Getac S410
i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 46.6 Wh		Durabook S14I
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 50 Wh
Battery Runtime
-59%
-55%
-72%
-82%
-81%
WiFi v1.3
1715
705
-59%
769
-55%
484
-72%
312
-82%
329
-81%
Reader / Idle
1371
Load
146

Pros

+ 快速释放配件、电池和M.2 SSD
+ Thunderbolt 4 w/ DisplayPort-over-USB
+ 明亮的1000-nit 1080p IPS触摸屏
+ 快速的集成GPU性能
+ 非常长的电池寿命

Cons

- 明显的风扇噪音和脉动行为
- 打开端口盖很麻烦
- 在所有亮度水平上都存在PWM
- 网络摄像头是720p，而不是1080p
- 没有USB-C电源传输

判决书

在审查中。Getac S410第4代。测试单位由Getac提供
在审查中。Getac S410第4代。测试单位由Getac提供

第10代英特尔和第11代英特尔之间的差异很大，特别是在图形性能方面。新的Iris Xe GPU比上一代UHD Graphics 620至少快2-3倍，而不需要消耗更多的电力，每瓦性能明显提高。如果你的工作负荷在GPU上很重，那么即使是这种简单的处理器更新也能提供比上一代S410型号明显更流畅的性能。

机箱在4年多的时间里基本没有变化，这意味着我们在2018年提到的许多相同的缺点在这个2022年的版本上仍然存在。我们很希望看到QoL方面的改进，例如更容易打开的端口盖，更高分辨率的网络摄像头，甚至是USB-C供电，这将使该系统在专有的AC适配器不可用时更加通用。脉宽调制仍然存在，这意味着对屏幕闪烁敏感的用户可能要避免长时间使用S410。相比之下， DellLatitude 7330 Rugged没有这种闪烁行为，同时集成了更容易打开的端口盖和USB-C PD。

价格和可用性

用户可以在这里向制造商，要求提供报价。.

Getac S410 Gen 4 - 05/18/2022 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo

Chassis
84 / 98 → 86%
Keyboard
73%
Pointing Device
68%
Connectivity
65 / 80 → 81%
Weight
55 / 20-75 → 64%
Battery
97%
Display
83%
Games Performance
68 / 78 → 87%
Application Performance
90 / 95 → 94%
Temperature
93%
Noise
88%
Audio
73%
Camera
39 / 85 → 45%
Average
75%
82%
Office - Weighted Average

More articles related to this device

Getac S410 Gen 4 (S Series)
Review
•
Getac S410 Gen 5 强固型笔记本电脑评测：提供...

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > Getac S410第4代笔记本电脑回顾。简单的变化，巨大的升级
Allen Ngo, 2022-05-19 (Update: 2022-05-19)