Gigabyte G5 KE评论:中档游戏笔记本,能满足大部分需求
![](fileadmin/_processed_/0/2/csm_g5_ke_header_2_67697b55ba.jpg)
Gigabyte根据性能和预算提供了几个笔记本等级。虽然Aorus和Aero系列是针对高端游戏和内容创作领域,但传统的技嘉变体,如G5和G7,是针对更主流的游戏观众。
我们以前审查过17.3英寸 技嘉G7 KE而现在我们要测试的是15.6英寸的技嘉G5 KE,规格基本相似。
我们的技嘉G5 KE单位配备了一个 英特尔第12代酷睿i5-12500H处理器、 NvidiaGeForce RTX 3060 笔记本电脑GPU,16GB内存,512GB SSD,以及15.6英寸144赫兹IPS面板。
这个配置将使你在印度市场上的94,990英镑(1,155美元)。在这篇评论中,我们对技嘉G5 KE进行了一次旋转,看看它是否能与中端游戏领域的同行相媲美。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
81.8 % | 04/2023 | Gigabyte G5 KE i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | 2 kg | 23.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
82.8 % | 10/2022 | Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 26 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
83.3 % | 01/2023 | Gigabyte G7 KE i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | 2.6 kg | 25 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
87.4 % | 09/2022 | Honor MagicBook 14 2022 i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | 1.6 kg | 16.9 mm | 14.00" | 2160x1440 | |
87.9 % | 01/2023 | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) R7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | 2.1 kg | 23 mm | 15.60" | 2560x1440 | |
86.1 % | 10/2022 | Dell G16 7620 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | 2.6 kg | 26.9 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
82.3 % | 09/2022 | Gigabyte A5 K1 R5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | 2.2 kg | 34 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
87.2 % | 03/2022 | Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | 2.1 kg | 24.95 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
84.3 % | 10/2021 | HP Victus 16-e0179ng R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | 2.5 kg | 23.5 mm | 16.10" | 1920x1080 |
底盘:主要是塑料,有一些弯曲
Gigabyte G5 KE的结构在这个价格范围内是预期的。它基本上是一个Clevo设计,完全是塑料结构,表面光滑、无光泽,在盖子的背面和触摸板上有一些微妙的点缀。
G5 KE的厚度为23.9毫米,与该细分市场上的竞争对手相似,同时比G5 K1要薄很多。 技嘉A5 K1.
G5 KE的机箱不是我们所见过的最坚硬的机箱--在键盘甲板的压力下有相当大的弯曲,盖子也会出现扭曲的情况。然而,用户在日常使用中不可能遇到这种情况。
打开13个飞利浦螺钉,就可以看到内部结构。如果需要,DDR4内存、WLAN卡和固态硬盘可以被替换和升级。
连接性:充足的端口选择和稳定的Wi-Fi
G5 KE提供了一个全面的端口选择,有USB Type-A和Type-C端口的组合,包括Thunderbolt 4。除了HDMI 2.1外,还有一个迷你显示端口1.4,有助于轻松连接到具有高刷新率的4K显示器。
这些端口在连接多个设备时不会构成任何障碍。一个专用的麦克风输入端口--现在很罕见--对连接高质量的麦克风很有帮助,或者可以重新配置以支持多通道音频。
微型SD卡的读取速度可能会更好,但G5 KE在这方面没有什么竞争力。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=95, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte G5 KE (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=95, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte G5 KE (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Gigabyte G7 KE (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) |
G5 KE不提供Wi-Fi 6E。然而,我们观察到,在与我们的参考华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000路由器一起测试时,5GHz频段的吞吐量非常好且相当稳定。
720p的网络摄像头显示出较大的色彩偏差,图像缺乏整体清晰度。它应该仍然可以满足一两个奇怪的视频通话。
![ColorChecker](fileadmin/_processed_/c/8/csm_WIN_20230211_08_08_14_Pro_a9ac6c5518.jpg)
输入设备:全尺寸方向键
显示:色域覆盖率低,响应时间长,没有PWM功能
Gigabyte G5 KE的1080p 144 Hz奇美面板在这一点上开始显示出它的年龄。我们以前在2021年的时候就见过这种面板。 技嘉G5 GD和 华硕TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM.竞争已经转移到更好的面板上,其色域覆盖面更广。
亮度分布为85%,还算不错,但对于2023年的笔记本电脑来说,色域范围很差,sRGB覆盖率仅约为61%。
|
Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 266 cd/m²
Contrast: 538:1 (Black: 0.5 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.54 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.95, calibrated: 3.34
ΔE Greyscale 3.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
42.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
61% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
40.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.17
Gigabyte G5 KE Chi Mei N156HRA-EA1, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Lenovo LEN156FHD, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Gigabyte G7 KE AU Optronics B173HAN05.1, , 1920x1080, 17.3" | Honor MagicBook 14 2022 HD140ZB-01A, , 2160x1440, 14" | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) CSOT MNF601CA1-1, , 2560x1440, 15.6" | Dell G16 7620 BOE NE16QDM, , 2560x1600, 16" | Gigabyte A5 K1 BOEhydis NV156FHM-N4K (BOE08B3), , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM TL156VDXP0101, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Victus 16-e0179ng BOE09BE, , 1920x1080, 16.1" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 66% | 69% | 64% | 66% | 65% | 56% | 62% | 72% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 40.7 | 69.1 70% | 70.4 73% | 67.9 67% | 68.8 69% | 68.3 68% | 64.4 58% | 66.4 63% | 72.6 78% |
sRGB Coverage | 61 | 99.2 63% | 99.8 64% | 98.5 61% | 99.3 63% | 98 61% | 92.5 52% | 97 59% | 100 64% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 42.1 | 69.9 66% | 71.7 70% | 68.7 63% | 69.9 66% | 70.5 67% | 66.1 57% | 68.5 63% | 73.5 75% |
Response Times | 53% | 68% | -41% | 50% | 56% | 48% | 55% | 44% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 26.64 ? | 13 ? 51% | 5 ? 81% | 37.2 ? -40% | 16 ? 40% | 8.6 ? 68% | 14.5 ? 46% | 5.6 ? 79% | 9.6 ? 64% |
Response Time Black / White * | 18.65 ? | 8.4 ? 55% | 8.3 ? 55% | 26.3 ? -41% | 7.6 ? 59% | 10.4 ? 44% | 9.5 ? 49% | 12.8 ? 31% | 14.4 ? 23% |
PWM Frequency | 28400 ? | ||||||||
Screen | 40% | 61% | 57% | 40% | 49% | 31% | 52% | 43% | |
Brightness middle | 269 | 338 26% | 307 14% | 330 23% | 378 41% | 369.4 37% | 295 10% | 353.7 31% | 361 34% |
Brightness | 248 | 329 33% | 301 21% | 320 29% | 371 50% | 348 40% | 281 13% | 340 37% | 341 38% |
Brightness Distribution | 85 | 92 8% | 93 9% | 90 6% | 93 9% | 83 -2% | 83 -2% | 89 5% | 88 4% |
Black Level * | 0.5 | 0.27 46% | 0.2 60% | 0.21 58% | 0.33 34% | 0.32 36% | 0.29 42% | 0.34 32% | 0.3 40% |
Contrast | 538 | 1252 133% | 1535 185% | 1571 192% | 1145 113% | 1154 114% | 1017 89% | 1040 93% | 1203 124% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.54 | 2.88 37% | 1.32 71% | 1.8 60% | 2.84 37% | 1.78 61% | 4.36 4% | 1.74 62% | 2.44 46% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 17.28 | 9.35 46% | 4.6 73% | 4.7 73% | 5.51 68% | 4.41 74% | 6.92 60% | 3.63 79% | 6.37 63% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 3.34 | 1.22 63% | 1.03 69% | 1.6 52% | 2.75 18% | 1.22 63% | 1.2 64% | 0.5 85% | 1.26 62% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.8 | 5 -32% | 2.1 45% | 3 21% | 4.08 -7% | 3.2 16% | 3.9 -3% | 2.1 45% | 4.6 -21% |
Gamma | 2.17 101% | 2.162 102% | 2.247 98% | 2.18 101% | 2.4 92% | 2.2 100% | 2.106 104% | 2.3 96% | 2.268 97% |
CCT | 7408 88% | 7497 87% | 6815 95% | 6697 97% | 5841 111% | 6750 96% | 7300 89% | 6257 104% | 6609 98% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 53% /
48% | 66% /
64% | 27% /
45% | 52% /
47% | 57% /
53% | 45% /
39% | 56% /
55% | 53% /
50% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
18.65 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10.83 ms rise | |
↘ 7.82 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 37 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.2 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
26.64 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 12.52 ms rise | |
↘ 14.12 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 32 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.2 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
≤ 100 cd/m² brightness | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17373 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
性能:酷睿i5-12500H和RTX 3060的组合没有带来任何重大惊喜
Gigabyte提供G5的两个变体:G5 KE和G5 ME,配备12C/16T英特尔酷睿i5-12500HCPU。虽然G5 KE提供了一个 NvidiaGeForce RTX 3060 笔记本GPU而G5 ME则采用了一个 RTX 3050 Ti笔记本GPU并且缺少一个雷电4端口。
G5 KE提供四种性能模式,详见下表:
性能模式 | PL1(PBP)/ Tau | PL2(MTP)/ Tau |
---|---|---|
静音 | 15 W / 8 s | 30 W / 2.44 ms |
省电模式 | 30 W / 8 s | 30 W / 2.44 ms |
娱乐 | 50 W / 28 s | 115 W / 2.44 ms |
性能 | 115 W / 80 s | 135 W / 2.44 ms |
处理器
G5 KE的酷睿i5-12500H与G7 KE中的酷睿i5-12500H很接近,也与 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H中的 XMG Core 15 (M22)在累积的CPU分数中。然而,它比Core i7-12700H落后了15%。 酷睿i7-12700H在 华硕TUF游戏F15.
在我们的Cinebench R15多核循环测试中,除了在运行过程中分数有极小的瞬间下降外,大部分的持续性能都很好。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R20: CPU (Single Core) | CPU (Multi Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Single 64Bit | CPU Multi 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Gigabyte G7 KE | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Gigabyte A5 K1 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Average of class Gaming (439 - 855, n=204, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Gigabyte G7 KE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H (602 - 656, n=9) | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Gigabyte A5 K1 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=204, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
Gigabyte G7 KE | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H (4687 - 5640, n=9) | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Gigabyte A5 K1 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Average of class Gaming (191.9 - 318, n=207, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
Gigabyte G7 KE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H (220 - 250, n=9) | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Gigabyte A5 K1 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=210, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 | |
Gigabyte G7 KE | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H (1970 - 2283, n=10) | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Gigabyte A5 K1 |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Gigabyte A5 K1 | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H (223 - 288, n=9) | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
Gigabyte G7 KE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
Average of class Gaming (87 - 555, n=199, last 2 years) |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Average of class Gaming (4199 - 7581, n=203, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Gigabyte G7 KE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 | |
Gigabyte A5 K1 | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H (5151 - 5563, n=9) | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Average of class Gaming (23795 - 140932, n=203, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
Gigabyte G7 KE | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H (44105 - 54380, n=9) | |
Gigabyte A5 K1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2210, n=205, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Gigabyte G7 KE | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H (1471 - 1693, n=9) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Gigabyte A5 K1 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 23194, n=205, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Gigabyte G7 KE | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H (7962 - 10828, n=9) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Gigabyte A5 K1 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Average of class Gaming (6.72 - 38.9, n=203, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
Gigabyte G7 KE | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H (12 - 16.6, n=9) | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Gigabyte A5 K1 |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Gigabyte A5 K1 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H (40.1 - 58.5, n=9) | |
Average of class Gaming (31.4 - 96.6, n=200, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte G7 KE | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Gigabyte A5 K1 | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H (0.4748 - 0.535, n=9) | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
Gigabyte G7 KE | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.759, n=204, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
我们的专用 英特尔酷睿i5-12500H页面提供更多信息和基准比较。
系统性能
G5 KE的PCMark 10总体性能与基于Core i7-12700H的笔记本电脑相当,同时在CrossMark中与Ryzen 7 6800H驱动的Schenker XMG Core 15(M22)相比有明显的领先。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Average of class Gaming (5442 - 9852, n=179, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (6126 - 7201, n=2) | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Gigabyte A5 K1 | |
Gigabyte G7 KE |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
Average of class Gaming (8829 - 12334, n=178, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (10301 - 11150, n=2) | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
Gigabyte G7 KE | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Gigabyte A5 K1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=178, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (9038 - 9475, n=2) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
Gigabyte G7 KE | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Gigabyte A5 K1 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Average of class Gaming (6462 - 18475, n=178, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (6703 - 9593, n=2) | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Gigabyte A5 K1 | |
Gigabyte G7 KE |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=161, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte G7 KE | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1752 - 1824, n=2) | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Gigabyte G7 KE | |
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=161, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1720 - 1804, n=2) | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2660, n=161, last 2 years) | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Gigabyte G7 KE | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1778 - 1800, n=2) | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Gigabyte G7 KE | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1771 - 1966, n=2) | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=161, last 2 years) | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 5554 points | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5937 points | |
PCMark 10 Score | 7201 points | |
Help |
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
Gigabyte G7 KE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Gigabyte A5 K1 | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 |
* ... smaller is better
请参考我们的DPC 延迟排查页面,以了解更多跨评测设备的延时比较。
存储设备
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10 | Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | Gigabyte G7 KE Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 | Honor MagicBook 14 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ | Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N | HP Victus 16-e0179ng WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 | Average Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10 | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -42% | 22% | 43% | -8% | -16% | 0% | 19% | |
Write 4K | 303.3 | 64 -79% | 363.1 20% | 229.88 -24% | 217.7 -28% | 157.3 -48% | 303 ? 0% | 210 ? -31% |
Read 4K | 64.25 | 77.05 20% | 59.23 -8% | 91.45 42% | 70.1 9% | 49 -24% | 64.3 ? 0% | 68.9 ? 7% |
Write Seq | 2258 | 93.07 -96% | 2605 15% | 2844 26% | 2983 32% | 2258 ? 0% | 3778 ? 67% | |
Read Seq | 2561 | 2570 0% | 2337 -9% | 2492 -3% | 2247 -12% | 2561 ? 0% | 3778 ? 48% | |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 620.6 | 184.6 -70% | 806.9 30% | 627.94 1% | 408.3 -34% | 395 -36% | 621 ? 0% | 533 ? -14% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 866.2 | 461.5 -47% | 1019 18% | 868.92 0% | 524 -40% | 557 -36% | 866 ? 0% | 671 ? -23% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 2264.3 | 1659 -27% | 3612 60% | 5118.5 126% | 3011 33% | 3094 37% | 2264 ? 0% | 4855 ? 114% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 4717.3 | 2936 -38% | 7067 50% | 6866.5 46% | 3553 -25% | 2871 -39% | 4717 ? 0% | 6475 ? 37% |
Write 4K Q8T8 | 2239.2 | 2910.25 30% | 2239 ? 0% | 1240 ? -45% | ||||
Read 4K Q8T8 | 1188.1 | 2687.03 126% | 1188 ? 0% | 1508 ? 27% | ||||
AS SSD | -48% | 39% | 28% | -23% | -21% | 0% | 7% | |
Seq Read | 3697.92 | 2432.02 -34% | 4540.75 23% | 5233 42% | 3013 -19% | 2383 -36% | 3698 ? 0% | 4933 ? 33% |
Seq Write | 2106.21 | 1229.14 -42% | 3805.55 81% | 3857 83% | 2768 31% | 2466 17% | 2106 ? 0% | 3698 ? 76% |
4K Read | 82.5 | 75.66 -8% | 99.79 21% | 85.14 3% | 66.9 -19% | 44.14 -46% | 82.5 ? 0% | 65.3 ? -21% |
4K Write | 312.09 | 242.19 -22% | 325.41 4% | 216.33 -31% | 184.8 -41% | 117.5 -62% | 312 ? 0% | 208 ? -33% |
4K-64 Read | 1675.54 | 441.63 -74% | 2914.54 74% | 2468.58 47% | 1923 15% | 1734 3% | 1676 ? 0% | 1886 ? 13% |
4K-64 Write | 1865.08 | 1218.61 -35% | 2915.33 56% | 3003.26 61% | 2198 18% | 2088 12% | 1865 ? 0% | 2538 ? 36% |
Access Time Read * | 0.066 | 0.073 -11% | 0.094 -42% | 0.023 65% | 0.03 55% | 0.049 26% | 0.066 ? -0% | 0.05369 ? 19% |
Access Time Write * | 0.013 | 0.033 -154% | 0.012 8% | 0.02 -54% | 0.081 -523% | 0.032 -146% | 0.013 ? -0% | 0.04898 ? -277% |
Score Read | 2128 | 760 -64% | 3468 63% | 3077 45% | 2291 8% | 2017 -5% | 2128 ? 0% | 2449 ? 15% |
Score Write | 2388 | 1584 -34% | 3621 52% | 3605 51% | 2660 11% | 2452 3% | 2388 ? 0% | 3113 ? 30% |
Score Total | 5541 | 2702 -51% | 8837 59% | 8195 48% | 6117 10% | 5503 -1% | 5541 ? 0% | 6750 ? 22% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 1077.37 | 1949.01 81% | 2093.45 94% | 2143 99% | 1077 ? 0% | 2727 ? 153% | ||
Copy Program MB/s | 827.5 | 1079.42 30% | 447.36 -46% | 871 5% | 828 ? 0% | 856 ? 3% | ||
Copy Game MB/s | 1460.58 | 2042.84 40% | 1195.09 -18% | 1840 26% | 1461 ? 0% | 1901 ? 30% | ||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -45% /
-46% | 31% /
33% | 36% /
34% | -16% /
-18% | -19% /
-19% | 0% /
0% | 13% /
12% |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
请查看我们专门的 SSD和HDD基准测试页面,了解更多存储设备的比较。
GPU性能
115瓦的 NvidiaGeForce RTX 3060 笔记本电脑GPU在3DMark测试中的表现不相上下。G5 KE显示出良好的领先优势,超过了 HP Victus在合成测试中显示出良好的领先优势,这是因为后者采用了95瓦的TGP配置。
3DMark 11 Performance | 26505 points | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 188480 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 53162 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 19966 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 10252 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 8922 points | |
Help |
游戏性能
技嘉G5 KE的游戏性能与我们测试过的其他基于RTX 3060的笔记本电脑相似,甚至能在几个游戏中超过具有相同配置的G7 KE。
我们注意到,在用TheWitcher 3 ,在1080p Ultra下对笔记本电脑进行压力测试时,没有发现明显的帧数下降。
The Witcher 3 FPS Chart
F1 2021 | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Average of class Gaming (65.1 - 470, n=21, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (119 - 227, n=9) | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset + Raytracing AA:T AF:16x | |
Average of class Gaming (27.6 - 271, n=21, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (67 - 112.8, n=9) | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 |
low | med. | high | ultra | |
GTA V (2015) | 183.4 | 179.9 | 172.8 | 103 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 333 | 255 | 168.7 | 87.6 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 168.5 | 153.1 | 144.8 | 137.5 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 179.3 | 118.9 | 90.3 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 118.4 | 105.6 | 86.7 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 159 | 134 | 129 | 118 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 385 | 216 | 175.3 | 153.3 |
F1 2021 (2021) | 303 | 200 | 177.9 | 105.1 |
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 105.4 | 85.3 | 72.5 | 68 |
F1 22 (2022) | 197 | 189.4 | 153.3 | 55.9 |
查看我们的专用 NvidiaGeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU页面,以及我们的 详尽的游戏比较列表以了解更多信息和性能比较。
Emissions: High surface temperatures and fan noise under load
系统噪音
在测试的性能模式下,空闲的系统噪音有些偏高,约为31 dB(A)。风扇噪音达到了55 dB(A),而不考虑负载。
在安静模式下,技嘉似乎已经将风扇噪音控制在30dB(A)以下。只有 Witcher 3,在省电模式下,风扇噪音排放较高,如下表所示。
性能模式 | 空闲分贝(A) | 负载平均分贝(A) | 负载最大分贝(A) | Witcher 3 分贝(A) |
---|---|---|---|---|
静音 | 22.21 | 25.73 | 24.64 | 27.62 |
省电 | 22.65 | 24.75 | 24.62 | 49.05 |
娱乐 | 22.63 | 54.67 | 55.52 | 53.11 |
性能 | 31.05 | 55.66 | 55.51 | 55.65 |
Noise Level
Idle |
| 31.05 / 31.05 / 31.05 dB(A) |
Load |
| 55.66 / 55.51 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 52.6 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 62.4 °C / 144 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 42.9 °C / 109 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 41.2 °C / 106.2 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-12.3 °C / -22.2 F).
Gigabyte G5 KE audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 88% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 74% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理:闲置时节俭用电,电池寿命平平
消耗功率
在功耗方面,技嘉G5 KE比G7 KE要经济不少,特别是在空闲时。
该 联想IdeaPad Gaming 3's RTX 3050 Ti笔记本GPU和惠普Victus的95W RTX 3060和Ryzen 7 5800H的组合。 Ryzen 7 5800H帮助这些设备总体上消耗较少的电力。
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Gigabyte G5 KE i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Gigabyte G7 KE i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) R7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.6" | Dell G16 7620 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Victus 16-e0179ng R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.1" | Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 9% | -33% | -14% | -42% | -8% | 9% | -18% | -45% | |
Idle Minimum * | 7.66 | 8 -4% | 15 -96% | 11.8 -54% | 14.4 -88% | 6.3 18% | 5 35% | 10.4 ? -36% | 13.4 ? -75% |
Idle Average * | 10.3 | 10 3% | 17 -65% | 14.7 -43% | 17.8 -73% | 9.8 5% | 10 3% | 14.5 ? -41% | 18.9 ? -83% |
Idle Maximum * | 16.05 | 16 -0% | 24 -50% | 15 7% | 31.5 -96% | 26.5 -65% | 20 -25% | 21.4 ? -33% | 26.8 ? -67% |
Load Average * | 115.8 | 99 15% | 111 4% | 100 14% | 101.2 13% | 103.8 10% | 108 7% | 109.3 ? 6% | 107.5 ? 7% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 168.7 | 144.6 14% | 174.1 -3% | 184 -9% | 176.9 -5% | 189 -12% | 145 14% | ||
Load Maximum * | 234.6 | 168 28% | 208 11% | 237 -1% | 242.9 -4% | 241.9 -3% | 189 19% | 206 ? 12% | 251 ? -7% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption: The Witcher 3 / Stress test
Power Consumption: External monitor
电池寿命
Pros
Cons
评语:主流游戏玩家有不可避免的妥协
虽然技嘉很快就会在未来几周内推出一系列更新的英特尔13代和RTX 40系列Aorus、Aero和技嘉笔记本电脑,但G5 KE配备了 英特尔酷睿i5-12500HCPU和 Nvidia RTX 3060笔记本GPU仍然是一个很好的主流游戏选择。
技嘉很好地利用了酷睿i5-12500H和RTX 3060笔记本GPU组合,我们没有发现整体性能的不良问题。双风扇四热管的冷却安排很好地确保了底层硬件在负载下不被扼杀。
技嘉G5 KE是一款有能力进行1080p超级游戏的主流笔记本电脑,其CPU和GPU性能非常好。然而,它在其他方面有所不足,这可能是或可能不是关键,取决于你的优先事项。
也就是说,与2023年的标准相比,显示屏是低于标准的,特别是当竞争设备,如 联想IdeaPad Gaming 3, 申科XMG Core 15 (M22),华硕TUF Gaming F15,以及技嘉自己的 G7 KE提供具有广泛色域覆盖和快速响应时间的巨大优势面板。
其他突出的不足之处包括:固态硬盘在负载下急剧节流,表面温度高,风扇声音大,视频播放时电池寿命差。
如果这些妥协对你来说并不重要,那么从纯粹的性能角度来看,技嘉G5 KE是一款体面的中端笔记本电脑,适合FHD游戏,应该可以为你服务到2023年。
价格和可用性
在印度,技嘉G5 KE目前在Flipkart上零售。折扣价为94,990,而印度亚马逊以95,901的价格提供配备RTX 3050 Ti的G5 ME。
配备RTX 3060的G5 KE在国际市场上有点难找,因为这款笔记本电脑正被基于RTX 4050或RTX 4060的配置所取代。
Gigabyte G5 KE
-
04/24/2023 v7 (old)
Vaidyanathan Subramaniam
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.