Gigaset GX6智能手机评测--稳定、快速、可更换电池
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
82.6 % v7 (old) | 12 / 2022 | Gigaset GX6 Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4 | 278 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.60" | 2412x1080 | |
81.9 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2022 | Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro SD 778G 5G, Adreno 642L | 235 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.60" | 2408x1080 | |
81.1 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2021 | Nokia XR20 SD 480, Adreno 619 | 248 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.67" | 2400x1080 | |
79.7 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2022 | AGM Glory G1S SD 480, Adreno 619 | 315 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.53" | 2340x1080 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
箱子和设备 - 坚固耐用,里面有很多东西
强固型电话在运动员中非常流行,但也有一些公司可以用它们将员工送入荒凉的环境中,而不会马上打破工作电话。因此,Gigaset扩大其范围内的坚固耐用的电话。GX6是应该说服新鲜空气爱好者以及企业老板。
因此,Gigaset依靠低调在外面。这款手机的背面有黑色和灰色两种颜色,由有质感的塑料制成,金色或银色的相机边框使这款户外手机看起来很优雅。此外,在底角有一个挂绳的开口,这也是设备附带的。方便的是,你甚至可以更换电池;在Gigaset更换电池需要35欧元(约37美元)。
金属框架略微突出于显示屏,以便在跌落的情况下保护它。此外,它还受到大猩猩玻璃5的保护,这是一种相当耐磨的显示玻璃。由于坚固的结构,手机不会被扭曲或凹陷。这款手机的防尘防水性能符合IP68标准,并通过了MIL-STD-810H认证。该手机重278克(约9.8盎司),比诺基亚或三星的竞争对手要重一些。
这款智能手机实际上是在德国组装的,尽管组件自然来自世界各地。制造商保持了无塑料包装。
Gigaset为该手机提供了一个可编程的侧面按钮,可用于执行快捷键或打开应用程序。USB-C端口也是根据USB 3.0标准设计的,所以数据的传输速度可以达到5GBit/s。
正面的通知LED和使用有线耳机时的调频收音机也是如此。还提供了NFC,以便可以使用移动支付服务。
在使用参考卡Angelbird V60的测试中,microSD读卡器的工作相当迅速。它与两个SIM卡插槽是分开的。
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Gigaset GX6 (Angelbird V60) | |
Average of class Smartphone (7.7 - 77, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro (Angelbird V60) | |
AGM Glory G1S (Angelbird V60) | |
Nokia XR20 (Angelbird V60) |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
通信、软件和操作 - WiFi 6和旧补丁
Gigaset GX6向用户提供了对WiFi 6的支持,从而实现了712和918 Mbps之间的良好传输速率。然而,你可以看到,有相对较大的波动。
5G已经上马,5G语音也可以实现。然而,频段的种类相当少,特别是在4G范围内,所以这款手机在国外进一步旅行时可能无法用于移动互联网。信号强度相当可靠,在我们的样本测试中处于较高水平。
Gigaset安装了相当纯粹的Android 12,没有第三方应用程序。安全补丁是2022年9月的,因此在测试时不是最新的。2年保修期外的许多维修都有统一的收费标准,可以提前在Gigaset的网站上查询。.
120赫兹的触摸显示屏可以非常迅速地操作,也可以非常流畅地显示滚动。许多手势是由手机支持。
Gigaset的智能手机可以通过指纹或面部识别的生物识别保护访问。指纹识别器被集成到右侧的待机按钮。它对已经学习过一次的指纹的反应非常可靠,但需要一秒钟,直到手机真正解锁。人脸识别也能可靠地工作,但它通过前置摄像头和软件解决方案运行,所以它不那么安全。
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Nokia XR20 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Nokia XR20 | |
AGM Glory G1S | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
AGM Glory G1S | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro | |
Gigaset GX6 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro | |
Gigaset GX6 |
照相机--即使有光学图像稳定功能
Gigaset GX6可以夸耀其来自OmniVision的5000万像素摄像头,甚至还有一个光学图像稳定器。然而,用户必须做的是没有广角镜头;只有一个相当低分辨率的微距相机。
来自主摄像头的照片看起来相当生动,但仔细看时却显示出不清晰的轮廓。照片的白平衡相当冷,也可以更亮一些。周围的细节看起来有点过于尖锐,较大的区域显示出明显的颗粒感。
在弱光下,有一个在黑暗地区缺乏绘画,但照明区域显示相当鲜明。总的来说,Gigaset GX6在其价格范围内拍摄了良好的照片。
视频可以记录在4K与30帧。曝光补偿和自动对焦在这里工作非常可靠,由此产生的视频是相当可用的,即使在光线稍弱的情况下。
前面有一个1300万像素的自拍相机。它拍摄的自拍对比度较低,但对社交媒体来说是可用的,而且放大倍数不会太高。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main camera FlowerMain camera EnvironmentMain camera Low Light显示器 - 具有120赫兹和良好的亮度
Gigaset的GX6配备了一个IPS显示屏,与三星Galaxy XCover 6 Pro 的显示屏类似,具有扩展的全高清分辨率和120赫兹帧率。在 诺基亚XR20另一方面,你只能得到一个60赫兹的显示屏。
在Gigaset GX6也可以跟上竞争,在亮度方面。只有诺基亚的手机在这里提供了一个更多的亮度。
对比度和色彩还原度相当好,但不完美。我们不建议那些想对显示屏的颜色进行专业判断的人使用这款手机。
我们没有注意到任何PWM,但响应时间相当慢。
|
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 505 cd/m²
Contrast: 1683:1 (Black: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.32 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.268
Gigaset GX6 IPS, 2412x1080, 6.6" | Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro PLS, 2408x1080, 6.6" | Nokia XR20 IPS, 2400x1080, 6.7" | AGM Glory G1S IPS, 2340x1080, 6.5" | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Response Times | 8% | -7% | -6% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 29 ? | 31 ? -7% | 36 ? -24% | 29 ? -0% |
Response Time Black / White * | 18 ? | 14 ? 22% | 16 ? 11% | 20 ? -11% |
PWM Frequency | 1163 ? | |||
Screen | -62% | -1% | -32% | |
Brightness middle | 505 | 510 1% | 599 19% | 390 -23% |
Brightness | 491 | 495 1% | 598 22% | 377 -23% |
Brightness Distribution | 93 | 92 -1% | 99 6% | 91 -2% |
Black Level * | 0.3 | 0.46 -53% | 0.33 -10% | 0.43 -43% |
Contrast | 1683 | 1109 -34% | 1815 8% | 907 -46% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.32 | 7.41 -72% | 4.52 -5% | 5.13 -19% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.22 | 13.26 -84% | 7.6 -5% | 7.96 -10% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3 | 10.6 -253% | 4.2 -40% | 5.7 -90% |
Gamma | 2.268 97% | 2.518 87% | 2.279 97% | 2.423 91% |
CCT | 7098 92% | 10050 65% | 7309 89% | 7974 82% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -27% /
-48% | -4% /
-2% | -19% /
-27% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
18 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10 ms rise | |
↘ 8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
29 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15 ms rise | |
↘ 14 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 35 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
性能、排放和电池寿命 - 功率大,运行时间长
由于采用了 联发科Dimensity 900SoC,Gigaset GX6配备了良好的性能,在这个价格范围内的户外电话。的 Galaxy XCover 6 Pro是一个有点快,在一些基准,但Gigaset手机是很好的装备,为日常使用。你可以顺利地在菜单中导航,甚至有些更复杂的应用程序和游戏也可以在手机上运行,并且可以进行多任务处理。然而,你不应该过度使用,这不是一款高端手机。
在Gigaset GX6不会得到过分的温暖。我们测量了一个最大的37.1℃(〜99 ° F)的前面。这是稍微明显的,但不是在所有问题。
底部的扬声器声音一般,提供了一个相当高的声音。通过耳机或外部扬声器听音乐更有趣。这些可以通过3.5毫米接口或蓝牙连接。除了aptX高清,但是,没有高清编解码器的支持,无线音频传输。
的Gigaset GX6可以通过电缆充电30瓦,但相应的充电器不包括在内。一个完整的充电需要一个最大的1:45小时。电池可以与高达15瓦的无线充电,根据齐标准。
5,000毫安时的电池可以更换,其容量比XCover 6 Pro高得多。 XCover 6 Pro.因此,这并不奇怪,Gigaset GX6持续时间更长。高达16:42小时是可能的,在我们的WLAN测试。这也应该是足够的两个工作日不充电。
GFXBench | |
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 144, n=203, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro | |
Gigaset GX6 | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 900 (15 - 16, n=6) | |
Nokia XR20 | |
AGM Glory G1S | |
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 112, n=203, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro | |
Gigaset GX6 | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 900 (9.7 - 11, n=6) | |
Nokia XR20 | |
AGM Glory G1S | |
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 247, n=203, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro | |
Gigaset GX6 | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 900 (22 - 25, n=6) | |
Nokia XR20 | |
AGM Glory G1S | |
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 263, n=203, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro | |
Gigaset GX6 | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 900 (24 - 28, n=6) | |
Nokia XR20 | |
AGM Glory G1S |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=205, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 900 (2800 - 30485, n=6) | |
Gigaset GX6 | |
Nokia XR20 |
Gigaset GX6 | Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro | Nokia XR20 | AGM Glory G1S | Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | 99% | 52% | 49% | 38% | 258% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 953.5 | 841.6 -12% | 485 -49% | 497.9 -48% | 760 ? -20% | 1863 ? 95% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 454.7 | 484.7 7% | 452 -1% | 484.1 6% | 297 ? -35% | 1446 ? 218% |
Random Read 4KB | 194.9 | 170.6 -12% | 174.8 -10% | 168 -14% | 152.9 ? -22% | 278 ? 43% |
Random Write 4KB | 39.9 | 204.2 412% | 146.2 266% | 141 253% | 131.6 ? 230% | 309 ? 674% |
温度
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.1 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.8 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
演讲者
Gigaset GX6 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 43% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 62% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
AGM Glory G1S audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 74.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 74.5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 74.5% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (120.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 88% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电池寿命
Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing | |
Gigaset GX6 | |
Average of class Smartphone (476 - 3244, n=204, last 2 years) | |
AGM Glory G1S | |
Nokia XR20 | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 来自德国的良好选择
吉格赛特设法提供一个彻底令人信服的替代品,以 Galaxy XCover 6 Pro:它的性能与XCover 6 Pro相似,有一个带图像稳定功能的好相机,一个高容量和可更换的电池,以及一个稳定的,尽管有点重的外壳。
显示屏足够明亮,显示颜色相当准确。它还可以在没有PWM的情况下进行管理。我们没有测量任何明显的加热在负载或节流,和Gigaset的手机可以充电与30瓦。
此外,你得到的手机是在德国组装的,也有一个全面的服务承诺。特别是在前几个月,你是很好的覆盖,作为一个德国客户,你可以利用现场维修在许多城市。
Gigaset GX6几乎没有任何弱点,并证明是一个快速和稳定的户外电话与纯Android 和可交换的电池。
除了过时的安全补丁,笨重的扬声器和有点沉重的外壳,我们无法找到任何真正的弱点在测试中。
尽管如此, 三星Galaxy XCover 6 Pro仍然是一个强有力的竞争者。这款手机现在以相当低的价格出售,例如在amazon.de。.与诺基亚XR20你不得不放弃性能和相机质量,但价格也大幅下降。
价格和可用性
Gigaset GX6是可以为579欧元(约合人民币611元),直接从制造商.
以同样的价格,手机是在测试时也与我们的贷款notebooksbilliger.de或与amazon.de可用。
Gigaset GX6
- 12/08/2022 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt