Notebookcheck Logo

HMD Pulse Pro 智能手机评测--经济实惠、可修复且极具特色?

使用新颜色。

HMD Pulse Pro 是诺基亚手机制造商推出的第一款以自己名字命名的手机。HMD Pulse Pro 具备我们熟悉的品质:在经济型手机领域的更新承诺和良好的可维修性。这是否足以让该公司在竞争激烈的经济型手机领域取得一个强有力的开端?
Android ARM Smartphone Touchscreen
HMD Pulse Pro
Processor
Unisoc T7200 8 x 1.6 GHz, Cortex-A75 / A55
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-G57 MP1
Memory
6 GB 
Display
6.65 inch 20:9, 1612 x 720 pixel 265 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS, glossy: yes, 90 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 128 GB 
, 100 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5mm audio jack, Card Reader: microSD (shared, up to 256 GB) , NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, proximity sensor
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B3/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B20/​B28/​B38/​B40), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.6 x 163.2 x 75
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Ion, 20-watt charging
Operating System
Android 14
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix phase-comparison AF, LED flash, videos @1080p/​30fps (camera 1); 2.0MP, depth of field (camera 2)
Secondary Camera: 50 MPix Videos @1080p/​30fps
Additional features
Speakers: mono speaker, USB cable, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, IP52-certified, fanless
Weight
196 g
Price
179 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Bewertung
Datum
Modell
Gewicht
Laufwerk
Groesse
Aufloesung
Preis ab
77 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2024
HMD Pulse Pro
T7200, Mali-G57 MP1
196 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.65"1612x720
79 %
v7 (old)
04 / 2024
Motorola Moto G24 Power
Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2
197 g256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash6.56"1612x720
80 %
v7 (old)
04 / 2024
Samsung Galaxy A15
Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2
200 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.50"2340x1080
80.2 %
v7 (old)
02 / 2024
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
SD 685, Adreno 610
188.5 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"2400x1080

机箱和规格 - 设计精美的塑料机箱

智能手机市场上的新玩家总是有些特别,但这里所说的制造商其实是一位知名人物:HMD 从 2016 年开始生产诺基亚手机,旨在为经济型手机市场带来可修复性和可持续性。

HMD Pulse Pro 是以该公司实际名称推出的首批设备之一--今后不会再有新的诺基亚手机。作为开端,制造商发布了一款售价约 180 欧元(190 美元)的智能手机,采用塑料机身,有三种配色:该手机采用塑料机身,有三种配色:黑海洋、暮光紫和冰川绿。我们这次评测的是一款绿色机型。

这三种颜色的机身背面都采用了光面设计,可多层反射光线,营造出非常时尚的效果。但使用数小时后,指纹可能会显现出来。

相机模块位于机身后部左上角,略微突出机身。它与机身的贴合非常整齐,倒角边缘和深色材质看起来非常时尚。机身的坚固程度可以接受:设备在受到一定的力时可以弯曲,但不会发出嘎吱嘎吱的响声。即使是轻微的压力也会影响显示屏中的液晶。

正面有一个相对较大的自拍摄像头冲孔,下巴有些突出。尽管如此,这款手机的设计在同价位手机中还是相当现代的。

HMD 非常重视手机的可修复性。通过与iFixitiFixit 合作,以合理的价格提供备件(目前更换屏幕和修复套件的价格为 45 欧元或 45 美元)。相应的指南也可以在网站上找到。HMD 在一份新闻稿中将此称为 "第一代可修复性",暗示未来的设备可以提供更好的可修复性。

Pulse Pro 拥有 128 GB 高速 UFS 存储空间和 6 GB 内存。它同样支持 NFC,可用于移动支付服务和扫描标签。你可以通过 3.5 毫米音频接口连接一副耳机,USB-C 端口支持充电和数据传输。

HMD Pulse Pro 提供两个 SIM 卡插槽,但使用 microSD 卡扩展存储需要放弃其中一个插槽。在我们使用 Angelbird V60 参考 microSD 卡进行的测试中,读卡器的表现相当不错,提供了该级别手机的典型传输速率,并保持了相当稳定的性能。

尺寸比较

163.5 mm 74.5 mm 9 mm 197 g163.2 mm 75 mm 8.6 mm 196 g162.2 mm 75.6 mm 8 mm 188.5 g160.1 mm 76.8 mm 8.4 mm 200 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A15
  (Angelbird V60)
42.6 MB/s +11%
HMD Pulse Pro
  (Angelbird V60)
38.5 MB/s
Motorola Moto G24 Power
  (Angelbird V60)
37.6 MB/s -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7.7 - 77, n=78, last 2 years)
29.2 MB/s -24%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
  (Angelbird V60)
24.3 MB/s -37%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
HMD Pulse Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60Angelbird V60: Ø37.1 (27.3-46.6)
Motorola Moto G24 Power Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø37 (22.6-43.5)
Samsung Galaxy A15 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø35.2 (23-46.3)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø26.5 (17.2-40)
HMD Pulse Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø74.4 (37-83.3)
Motorola Moto G24 Power Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø76.7 (15.6-84)
Samsung Galaxy A15 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø75.1 (47.4-81.9)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø76 (18.4-82.5)

连接、软件和操作 - 完整的更新承诺

HMD Pulse Pro 最高支持 Wi-Fi 5,这意味着它的数据传输速率在 300 到 350 Mbit/s 之间。虽然我们在测试中看到了轻微的波动,但传输速度总体上还是相当稳定的。

遗憾的是,这款新的 HMD 手机不支持 5G。该设备也只兼容有限的 4G 频率。因此,虽然 Pulse Pro 可以在欧洲中部使用,但如果您计划去更远的地方旅行,则需要提前检查它是否能够访问目的地国家的 4G 网络。我们在城市环境中的随机地点进行了测试,发现接收质量很稳定,但不如高端手机。

这款手机搭载的是Android 14,但 HMD 在数字排毒方面做了一些改动。例如,预装应用程序的图标采用了黑白两色,随机附带的铃声也尽可能让人平静。专家们将在这方面继续努力,为用户提供更轻松的体验,帮助他们偶尔放下手机。

制造商承诺会提供两次操作系统更新(即更新至Android 16),这对于这个价位的手机来说绝非易事。安全更新也将每季度提供一次,至少持续到 2027 年 5 月。在本次评测时,安全补丁的日期是 2024 年 2 月,这意味着下一次更新应该就在眼前。

显示屏能以 90Hz 的频率运行,因此能迅速可靠地响应我们的输入。触摸屏即使在边缘和角落也能正常工作。设备右侧内置了快速、准确的指纹传感器。Pulse Pro 还提供面部解锁功能,但显示屏发出的光线有时不足以使该功能正常工作。

Networking
HMD Pulse Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
352 (min: 305) MBit/s ∼97%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
319 (min: 238) MBit/s ∼100%
Motorola Moto G24 Power
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
358 (min: 342) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
289 (min: 275) MBit/s ∼91%
Samsung Galaxy A15
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
364 (min: 352) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
285 (min: 259) MBit/s ∼89%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
364 (min: 336) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
317 (min: 293) MBit/s ∼99%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360Tooltip
HMD Pulse Pro; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø319 (238-341)
HMD Pulse Pro; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø352 (305-369)

照相机 - 更多用于快照

使用前置摄像头拍摄
使用前置摄像头拍摄

HMD Pulse Pro 的摄像头像素很容易记住:主摄像头和自拍摄像头的分辨率均为 5000 万像素。后置摄像头两侧有第二个镜头,用于营造景深效果。不过,这个摄像头不能单独拍摄图像。

主摄像头拍摄的照片相当清晰,但对比度一般:在前景明亮、背景昏暗的情况下,一些细节会丢失。在我们周围环境的照片中,有些区域曝光过度,前景中的物体和大表面上的细节显得模糊不清。照片中的某些区域也同样显得模糊不清,缺乏对比度。主摄像头可以通过光源有效地提亮暗部图像,但这也会导致亮部细节丢失。整体看来,图像模糊且颗粒感较强。

在我们的实验室中,在全光照条件下,相机拍摄的图像色温较低。在红色背景的字母和数字周围偶尔会出现像素化边缘。但其他方面的图像质量还是令人满意的。在 1 勒克斯光照下拍摄的照片根本无法辨认出任何东西。

HMD Pulse Pro 可录制高达 1080p 和 30 fps 的视频。自动曝光相当迅速,但自动对焦明显滞后,而且并不总是非常准确。

HMD 非常重视 5000 万像素的自拍摄像头,它可以通过手势(如心形或和平手势)触发。我们的评测团队在使用这一非常方便的功能时获得了很多乐趣。遗憾的是,自拍照本身并没有给我们带来好心情。即使是第一眼看上去,照片也有些模糊,暗部几乎没有任何细节。照片放大后,细节也显得模糊不清。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera: plantMain camera: surroundingsMain camera: low light
ColorChecker
7 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
11 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
ColorChecker HMD Pulse Pro: 8.9 ∆E min: 3.66 - max: 14.83 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.6 ∆E
55.1 ∆E
39.8 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
45.6 ∆E
62.4 ∆E
53.7 ∆E
36.1 ∆E
44.2 ∆E
29 ∆E
65.1 ∆E
64.1 ∆E
31.5 ∆E
47.7 ∆E
37.8 ∆E
76.8 ∆E
44.6 ∆E
42 ∆E
94.3 ∆E
71.4 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker HMD Pulse Pro: 47.17 ∆E min: 13.35 - max: 94.33 ∆E

显示屏 - Pulse Pro 的屏幕上没有 PWM

子像素图像
子像素图像

HMD Pulse Pro 的 IPS 显示屏分辨率为 1,612 x 720,略逊于三星和小米的同类产品,后者配备的是全高清 AMOLED 屏幕。不过,这种显示技术和像素在这个价位的产品中并不罕见。

显示屏的峰值亮度为 501 cd/m²,在阴天的室外使用也足够明亮。在阳光直射的情况下,由于反光,屏幕上的任何东西都很难看清。幸好黑阶较低,使面板在我们的测量中达到了出色的对比度。面板上的蓝色色调在一定程度上影响了高色彩强度,但其色彩准确度尚可。

即使在很低的亮度下,我们也没有发现任何 PWM 闪烁。

459
cd/m²
474
cd/m²
446
cd/m²
479
cd/m²
501
cd/m²
495
cd/m²
465
cd/m²
458
cd/m²
449
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 501 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 469.6 cd/m² Minimum: 1.9 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 501 cd/m²
Contrast: 2947:1 (Black: 0.17 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.21 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 6.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.297
HMD Pulse Pro
IPS, 1612x720, 6.7"
Motorola Moto G24 Power
IPS, 1612x720, 6.6"
Samsung Galaxy A15
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.5"
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Response Times
-10%
94%
94%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
35.7 ?(18.8, 16.9)
39 ?(22.1, 16.9)
-9%
2 ?(1, 1)
94%
2.2 ?(1.1, 1.1)
94%
Response Time Black / White *
26.1 ?(12.7, 13.4)
28.6 ?(15.8, 12.8)
-10%
1.7 ?(0.8, 0.9)
93%
1.6 ?(0.7, 0.9)
94%
PWM Frequency
187
389.2
Screen
-25%
48%
70%
Brightness middle
501
499
0%
731
46%
940
88%
Brightness
470
497
6%
711
51%
922
96%
Brightness Distribution
89
93
4%
93
4%
96
8%
Black Level *
0.17
0.49
-188%
Contrast
2947
1018
-65%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
5.21
4.82
7%
2.31
56%
1.2
77%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
8.79
7.76
12%
3.51
60%
2.28
74%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
6.3
4.7
25%
1.7
73%
1.4
78%
Gamma
2.297 96%
2.073 106%
2.091 105%
2.27 97%
CCT
8524 76%
7445 87%
6424 101%
6503 100%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-18% / -22%
71% / 60%
82% / 76%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
26.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 12.7 ms rise
↘ 13.4 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 62 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
35.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18.8 ms rise
↘ 16.9 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 46 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

卡尔曼灰度
卡尔曼灰度
CalMAN 色彩精度
CalMAN 色彩精度
CalMAN 色域
CalMAN 色域
CalMAN 饱和度
CalMAN 饱和度

性能、排放和电池寿命 - 需要更快的 SoC

HMD 选择了相当薄弱的 Unisoc T606系统芯片。即使在这个价格范围内,现在也有功能更强大的手机可供选择。在日常使用中,即使在运行基本应用程序或浏览菜单时,也会出现等待时间过长和卡顿的问题。

不过,HMD 在存储方面并没有偷工减料。Pulse Pro 使用 UFS 2.2,速度相当快,减少了传输和加载数据所需的时间。尽管系统芯片速度相对较慢,但这也有助于系统流畅运行。

我们在手机正面测得的最高温度为 43.9°C(111.0°F)。这一点非常明显,在温暖的日子里甚至可能会升高。3DMark 压力测试显示,SoC 的性能并未受到热量的影响。

HMD Pulse Pro 底部边缘是一个单声道扬声器,可提供不错的音效。它的音量可以通过 Audio Boost(音频增强)功能进一步增大,但这会使其听起来高音偏重。禁用该功能后,扬声器的声音会更加饱满,并能提供清晰的语音和人声。

您还可以通过 3.5 毫米音频插孔或蓝牙将外部音频设备连接到手机。在我们的测试中,这两种方法都能发出清晰的音频。Pulse Pro 提供多种无线音频编解码器可供选择:除了 SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD 和 LDAC 等标准编解码器外,还提供略微高级的 Opus 和 LC3。

Pulse Pro 的电池容量为 5,000 mAh,这在这个价位的大多数设备中很常见。在我们的电池续航时间对比中,这款手机的表现相当不错,在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试中几乎刚好可以使用 15 个小时。在频繁使用的情况下,它的续航能力足以支撑一整天。手机充电功率可达 20 瓦,但 HMD 没有提供充电器。

Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 3479, n=160, last 2 years)
1443 Points +284%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
728 Points +94%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
478 Points +27%
Motorola Moto G24 Power
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8
416 Points +11%
HMD Pulse Pro
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
376 Points
Average Unisoc T7200
  (368 - 380, n=11)
375 Points 0%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 10401, n=160, last 2 years)
4025 Points +204%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1942 Points +47%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
1544 Points +17%
Motorola Moto G24 Power
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8
1423 Points +7%
Average Unisoc T7200
  (1285 - 1482, n=11)
1364 Points +3%
HMD Pulse Pro
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
1324 Points
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=171, last 2 years)
993 Points +223%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
552 Points +80%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
437 Points +42%
Motorola Moto G24 Power
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8
357 Points +16%
HMD Pulse Pro
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
307 Points
Average Unisoc T7200
  (273 - 313, n=19)
306 Points 0%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6687, n=171, last 2 years)
3309 Points +161%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1879 Points +48%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
1775 Points +40%
Motorola Moto G24 Power
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8
1349 Points +6%
HMD Pulse Pro
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
1270 Points
Average Unisoc T7200
  (708 - 1324, n=19)
1206 Points -5%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 24088, n=189, last 2 years)
12976 Points +61%
Motorola Moto G24 Power
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8
9437 Points +17%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
9195 Points +14%
HMD Pulse Pro
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
8059 Points
Average Unisoc T7200
  (6637 - 8303, n=19)
7338 Points -9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
7305 Points -9%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Average of class Smartphone
  (317 - 20131, n=159, last 2 years)
7743 Points +693%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2568 Points +163%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
1597 Points +63%
Motorola Moto G24 Power
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8
1438 Points +47%
HMD Pulse Pro
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
977 Points
Average Unisoc T7200
  (959 - 989, n=18)
975 Points 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (267 - 33376, n=159, last 2 years)
11505 Points +1288%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2411 Points +191%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
1427 Points +72%
Motorola Moto G24 Power
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8
1263 Points +52%
HMD Pulse Pro
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
829 Points
Average Unisoc T7200
  (814 - 834, n=18)
825 Points 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Average of class Smartphone
  (877 - 8480, n=159, last 2 years)
4605 Points +77%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3329 Points +28%
Motorola Moto G24 Power
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8
2790 Points +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
2739 Points +5%
Average Unisoc T7200
  (2484 - 2697, n=18)
2625 Points +1%
HMD Pulse Pro
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
2608 Points
Wild Life Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (408 - 13896, n=111, last 2 years)
2840 Points +567%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1195 Points +181%
Motorola Moto G24 Power
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8
731 Points +72%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
645 Points +51%
HMD Pulse Pro
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
426 Points
Average Unisoc T7200
  (394 - 432, n=18)
416 Points -2%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (413 - 20321, n=180, last 2 years)
7523 Points +1683%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1094 Points +159%
Motorola Moto G24 Power
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8
725 Points +72%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
634 Points +50%
HMD Pulse Pro
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
422 Points
Average Unisoc T7200
  (392 - 424, n=18)
413 Points -2%
Wild Life Extreme
Average of class Smartphone
  (114 - 7094, n=186, last 2 years)
2050 Points +1652%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
332 Points +184%
Motorola Moto G24 Power
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8
187 Points +60%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
139 Points +19%
HMD Pulse Pro
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
117 Points
Average Unisoc T7200
  (85 - 118, n=18)
107.3 Points -8%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Average of class Smartphone
  (112 - 7212, n=184, last 2 years)
2048 Points +1712%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
326 Points +188%
Motorola Moto G24 Power
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8
186 Points +65%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
135 Points +19%
HMD Pulse Pro
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
113 Points
Average Unisoc T7200
  (99 - 121, n=15)
107.7 Points -5%
GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.6 - 123, n=200, last 2 years)
49.5 fps +395%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
14 fps +40%
Motorola Moto G24 Power
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8
14 fps +40%
HMD Pulse Pro
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
10 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
9.5 fps -5%
Average Unisoc T7200
  (5.1 - 11, n=18)
8.83 fps -12%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.3 - 261, n=200, last 2 years)
79.6 fps +1347%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
16 fps +191%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
10 fps +82%
Motorola Moto G24 Power
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8
9 fps +64%
HMD Pulse Pro
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
5.5 fps
Average Unisoc T7200
  (1.9 - 5.5, n=18)
5.22 fps -5%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 119, n=200, last 2 years)
37.4 fps +4300%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
8.9 fps +947%
Motorola Moto G24 Power
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8
7.4 fps +771%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
5.5 fps +547%
Average Unisoc T7200
  (0.85 - 7.3, n=18)
5.34 fps +528%
HMD Pulse Pro
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
0.85 fps
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 104, n=200, last 2 years)
31.9 fps +1495%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
5.9 fps +195%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
3.6 fps +80%
Motorola Moto G24 Power
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8
3.3 fps +65%
HMD Pulse Pro
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
2 fps
Average Unisoc T7200
  (0.85 - 2.1, n=18)
1.925 fps -4%
3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.38 - 46, n=200, last 2 years)
15 fps +127%
HMD Pulse Pro
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
6.6 fps
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2.5 fps -62%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
1.5 fps -77%
Motorola Moto G24 Power
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8
1.5 fps -77%
Average Unisoc T7200
  (0.8 - 6.6, n=14)
1.253 fps -81%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (2228 - 100368, n=202, last 2 years)
37036 Points +204%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
21890 Points +79%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
15900 Points +30%
Motorola Moto G24 Power
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8
15430 Points +27%
HMD Pulse Pro
Unisoc T7200, Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
12195 Points
Average Unisoc T7200
  (2228 - 13455, n=14)
11332 Points -7%
HMD Pulse ProMotorola Moto G24 PowerSamsung Galaxy A15Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4GAverage 128 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-63%
-8%
-13%
-22%
57%
Sequential Read 256KB
966
297
-69%
967.8
0%
909.8
-6%
Sequential Write 256KB
824
253.2
-69%
488.5
-41%
606.3
-26%
Random Read 4KB
205
100
-51%
233.2
14%
177.1
-14%
191.7 ?(89.3 - 297, n=71)
-6%
Random Write 4KB
239
92.2
-61%
229.6
-4%
228
-5%
185.8 ?(62.6 - 419, n=71)
-22%

温度

Max. Load
 43.9 °C35.8 °C33.1 °C 
 42.1 °C34.1 °C32.4 °C 
 40.1 °C34.2 °C33.8 °C 
Maximum: 43.9 °C
Average: 36.6 °C
30.1 °C35.6 °C40.6 °C
30 °C35.9 °C40.4 °C
31.2 °C36.4 °C39.6 °C
Maximum: 40.6 °C
Average: 35.5 °C
Power Supply (max.)  41.2 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.9 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.6 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.


热图前端
热图前端
热图返回
热图返回

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

01234567Tooltip
HMD Pulse Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.56 (2.55-2.58)
Motorola Moto G24 Power Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.39 (4.36-4.4)
Samsung Galaxy A15 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.47 (7.42-7.49)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.91 (3.89-3.93)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2043.738.92533.232.13129.326.44032.331.45040.735.66332.626.38019.718.610016.917.612515.518.916013.330.72009.633.625011.835.63159.237.84008.7455001153.163013.257.880013.761.9100014.867.1125013.770160010.672.7200010.972250012.368.9315013.765.2400013.663.6500013.968.1630014.467.8800015.660.51000015.959.2125001654.91600016.744.9SPL25.879.9N0.741.1median 13.7median 59.2Delta2.113.837.238.530.332.924.123.831.429.137.334.625.928.519.520.116.52713.731.113.736.29.2368.337.16.742.4749.18.854.88.358.18.964.610.765.78.767.19.164.99.765.710.661.811.353.21260.212.961.313.768.614.467.615.360.31657.91757.423.976.20.535.7median 10.7median 58.12.711.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHMD Pulse ProXiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
HMD Pulse Pro audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 76% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 87% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 43% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 62% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
Motorola Moto G24 Power
6000 mAh
1103 min +23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (476 - 3244, n=201, last 2 years)
982 min +9%
HMD Pulse Pro
5000 mAh
899 min
Samsung Galaxy A15
5000 mAh
885 min -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
5000 mAh
742 min -17%
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
14h 59min

Pros

+ 底盘美观
+ 相对可修
+ 库存Android ,承诺更新
+ 近场通讯
+ 高速存储
+ 无 PWM
+ 良好的电池寿命

Cons

- 底盘可以更坚固
- SoC 速度缓慢
- 摄像头质量一般
- 仅支持少量 LTE 频率

结论 - 一个不错的开端

HMD Pulse Pro 评测机由德国 HMD 慷慨提供。
HMD Pulse Pro 评测机由德国 HMD 慷慨提供。

凭借 Pulse Pro,HMD 创造了一款值得称赞的智能手机,这也是他们首次推出自己的品牌。这款手机在 200 欧元以下的机型中具有一些独特的功能,如相对较高的可修复性(备件价格低廉)、三年以上的更新和快速存储。

制造商赋予了机身时尚的设计,但如果能再坚固一些就更好了。扬声器音质尚可,电池续航时间相当长,显示屏相当明亮,没有使用 PWM。不过,这款手机的性能尤其没有给人留下深刻印象;在这个价位的手机中,有速度更快的替代品。

主摄像头有点令人失望,即使对于一款经济型手机来说也是如此。号称 5000 万像素的前置摄像头也只能拍出不太吸引人的自拍照。

HMD 想做的事情很多,未来有可能成为令人瞩目的替代产品。但该制造商在 HMD Pulse Pro 上的做法仍然非常稳妥,以适中的价格提供了一款具有良好维修性和长期更新支持的可靠智能手机。

HMD Pulse Pro 是一款外观漂亮、维修相对容易的经济型手机。

如果您想选择其他手机,可以考虑 三星Galaxy A15 4G小米Redmi Note 13 4G.这两款设备性能更强,采用 AMOLED 屏幕,但不便于用户更换,而且更新承诺有限。

价格和供应情况

HMD Pulse Pro 可直接从制造商或亚马逊等在线零售商处购买,售价为 179 欧元(约合 190 美元)。

您可以访问公司网站了解国际供货情况。

HMD Pulse Pro - 05/02/2024 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
84%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
90%
Connectivity
47 / 70 → 67%
Weight
88%
Battery
91%
Display
84%
Games Performance
12 / 64 → 18%
Application Performance
60 / 86 → 70%
Temperature
90%
Noise
100%
Audio
65 / 90 → 72%
Camera
53%
Average
72%
77%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > HMD Pulse Pro 智能手机评测--经济实惠、可修复且极具特色?
Florian Schmitt, 2024-05- 3 (Update: 2024-05- 3)