Honor Magic4 Lite 5G评论。拥有大显示屏和强大电池的智能手机

Name: Honor Magic4 Lite
Brand: Honor

这是一种魔法。

Magic代表了Honor ，是智能手机的顶级联盟。另一方面，Lite是瘦身硬件的一个指标。因此，Honor Magic4 Lite 5G属于两极之间的中间位置。120赫兹刷新率，但只有一个LC显示屏。三摄像头，但既不是广角镜头也不是长焦镜头。魔法还是精简版？阅读我们的评论就知道了。

Benedikt Winkel, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 08/16/2022 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

5G Android Touchscreen Smartphone

从华为分拆出来后，Honor ，希望通过Magic4系列在欧洲重新站稳脚跟。评论中的Lite设备在中端市场上竞争。这是因为，除了Lite 5G，Honor 还提供有一些差异的4G版本：显示屏的刷新率为90，而不是120赫兹，并且采用了骁龙680而不是 695作为回报，Lite 4G的主摄像头的最大分辨率为6400万像素，而不是4800万像素。这两款智能手机都有午夜黑和海洋蓝两种颜色，而Lite 5G也有钛银色。我们的评测设备是蓝色的。

Honor 从来没有正式向欧洲介绍过前辈Magic3。

Test device courtesy of Honor Germany

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Honor Magic4 Lite (Magic Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 8 x 1.7 - 2.2 GHz, Kryo 660 Gold (2x Cortex-A78) / Silver (6x Cortex-A55)

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 619

Memory

6 GB

Display

6.81 inch 19.9:9, 2388 x 1080 pixel 385 PPI, Capacitive, TFT-LCD, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz

Storage

128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 128 GB

, 111 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, compass

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.1, GSM (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), UMTS (Band 1, 2, 5, 8), LTE (Band 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41), 5G (Band 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.05 x 166.07 x 75.78

Battery

4800 mAh Lithium-Polymer

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 11

Camera

Primary Camera: 48 MPix (f/1.8, 26 mm) + 2 MPix (f/2.4) macro + 2 MPix (f/2.4) depth
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix (f/2.5)

Additional features

Speakers: 1, Keyboard: Virtual, 66W-Charger, USB-Cabel (Type-A to Type-C), SIM-Needle, Magic UI 4.2, 24 Months Warranty, Single-Band-GNSS: GPS (L1), Glonass (L1), Galileo (E1), BeiDou (B1); Head-SAR: 0.85 W/kg, Body-SAR: 1.29 W/kg, fanless

Weight

195 g, Power Supply: 137 g

Price

349 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
79 % v7 ^(old)	08 / 2022	Honor Magic4 Lite SD 695 5G, Adreno 619	195 g	128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.81"	2388x1080
83.4 % v7 ^(old)	06 / 2022	Samsung Galaxy A53 Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4	189 g	128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.50"	2400x1080
80.5 % v7 ^(old)	04 / 2022	Realme 9 Pro SD 695 5G, Adreno 619	195 g	128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.60"	2412x1080
80.8 % v7 ^(old)	08 / 2022	OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G SD 695 5G, Adreno 619	195 g	128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.59"	2412x1080
80.5 % v7 ^(old)	01 / 2022	Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2	195 g	128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.60"	2400x1080
81 % v7 ^(old)	07 / 2022	Motorola Moto G52 SD 680, Adreno 610	169 g	128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.60"	2400x1080

外壳 - Magic4 Lite，带塑料后盖

Honor 在Magic4 Lite 5G上选择了一个中产阶级的外壳。例如，这在塑料背面是很明显的。蓝色的变体提供了很好的光线反射，但感觉不是特别高质量。经过两周的日常使用，我们的评测样本显示背部的下部区域和相机的驼峰上有划痕。另一方面，金属边框部分是哑光的，部分是亮光的，是防刮的。一般的做工没有留下批评的余地。该设备不能被扭曲，在受到扭转压力时也不会发出任何噪音。背面不能凹陷，但特别容易受到指纹的影响。SIM卡端口有一个橡胶密封，这表明该模型可能是防水的，但Magic4 Lite 5G并没有IP认证。

Honor 该智能手机配备了一个适当大小的屏幕保护膜。然而，事实证明，该薄膜在测试中很容易被划伤。由于相机的中心位置，该设备在平面上使用时不会晃动。

尺寸比较

Honor Magic4 Lite Realme 9 Pro OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Motorola Moto G52 Samsung Galaxy A53 DIN A6 ❌

设备 -Honor ，有双5G，但没有microSD

Magic4 Lite 5G没有一个通知LED。这很烦人，因为LC显示屏不支持常开功能。通过触摸或轻拍唤醒显示屏也是不可能的，所以总是要点击电源按钮或将设备直立起来才能激活。

Magic4 Lite 5G不能通过SD卡进行内存扩展。另一方面，卡槽可以容纳两张SIM卡。因此，双卡是可能的，但不支持eSIM。还缺少一个音频插孔。Honor ，该智能手机只提供一种配置。6GB的内存和128GB的存储。此外，制造商还宣传了2GB的虚拟内存涡轮增压。

该设备顶部的开口看起来像一个扬声器，但原来是手机的听筒。这里没有媒体输出；Magic4 Lite 5G只有一个单声道扬声器。

软件 - Magic UI 4.2 基于Android 11

Honor Magic4 Lite 5G使用Magic UI 4.2界面，它基于Android 11。该界面让人强烈联想到华为的EMUI，不需要应用启动器。一些第三方应用程序，如booking.com、Netflix、TikTok、Lords mobile、trainpal、trip.com和WPS Office被预装，但它们都可以很容易地被卸载。在测试中，该系统在所有领域都能顺利运行，没有任何错误或漏洞。

如果智能手机通过电缆与电脑连接，图片、联系人和信息可以通过Honor Suite程序进行同步。更新也可以通过该软件控制。Honor ，没有提供任何有关即将到来的更新的信息，目前还不清楚Android 12是否以及何时会交付。在审查过程中，该智能手机在7月初收到了一个安全更新，并在4月至6月更新了补丁。基于这一点，可以假设该设备将每三个月获得一次安全更新。

通信和全球导航卫星系统--速度适中，不受制于人

Honor Magic4 Lite 5G支持LTE和5G移动通信中对欧洲很重要的所有频段。信号强度在测试中被证明是不明显的，5G在两张SIM卡上都被支持。然而，在世界其他地区使用的频率部分缺失，毫米波也不支持。

Honor ，不支持Wi-Fi 6。总的来说，用我们的华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000参考路由器测试的Wi-Fi传输速率并不突出，但与对比设备相比，智能手机在接收方面仍处于领先地位，最重要的是，它的传输速率非常稳定，给人留下深刻印象。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone (34.8 - 1875, n=185, last 2 years)	713 MBit/s +101%
Honor Magic4 Lite Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	354 (339^min - 359^max) MBit/s
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	352 (339^min - 360^max) MBit/s -1%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	345 (328^min - 351^max) MBit/s -3%
Realme 9 Pro Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	333 (320^min - 345^max) MBit/s -6%
Motorola Moto G52 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	283 (244^min - 311^max) MBit/s -20%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone (40.5 - 1810, n=187, last 2 years)	730 MBit/s +110%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	363 (354^min - 376^max) MBit/s +5%
Realme 9 Pro Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	358 (339^min - 370^max) MBit/s +3%
Honor Magic4 Lite Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	347 (175^min - 354^max) MBit/s
Motorola Moto G52 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	292 MBit/s -16%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	269 (255^min - 281^max) MBit/s -22%

Honor Magic4 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø352 (339-359)

Realme 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø332 (320-345)

Honor Magic4 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø341 (175-354)

Realme 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø358 (339-370)

Honor Magic4 Lite 5G在室内和室外都能成功地进行快速定位，但在确定其准确位置时需要花费一点时间。正如在骑车过程中与Garmin Venu 2的比较所显示的那样，评测样本的准确性不是很有说服力。虽然记录的总长度几乎相同，但数据显示，Honor ，往往不是显示在道路上，而是显示在邻近的绿色区域。在基于GNSS的导航中，智能手机也一次只支持一个频段。另一方面，我们在日常导航中没有遇到任何问题，例如使用谷歌地图。然而，寻宝者应该寻找其他设备。

电话和语音质量

Magic4 Lite 5G的语音质量很好，特别是对智能手机用户来说。对方的声音很清晰，没有失真，扬声器的声音也相当大。Honor 的用户可以很好地理解对方的意思，但背景噪音只被微弱地过滤掉。通过免提功能打电话也是可能的。扬声器的声音足够大，而且可以在没有干扰的情况下进行双向通信。

Honor Magic4 Lite 5G可以容纳两张nano SIM卡，但不支持eSim。两张SIM卡都可以实现5G接收。Honor 智能手机还提供VoLTE和通过WLAN通话。

摄像机 - 在Honor 摄像机设置中只有一个可用的镜头

Honor Magic4 Lite 5G的前置摄像头的分辨率为16MP。视频可以在30fps下以最大的1080p拍摄。相机应用程序提供不同级别的美容模式。照片足够清晰，人像模式在大多数情况下都能令人信服地工作。

鸿雁决定放弃变焦和广角镜头，对于这个价格范围来说是令人惊讶的。虽然Magic4 Lite 5G有一个三摄像头系统，但4800万像素的主摄像头只伴随着一个微距镜头和一个深度信息镜头，每个镜头有200万像素。主摄像头的照片是可以接受的，但它们非常明亮，特别是在AI功能激活时。微距相机的照片只有在非常好的照明条件下才会成功，但从来没有真正的清晰度。数码变焦在紧急情况下是有用的，但不能取代变焦镜头。智能手机的低光性能也有改进的余地：个别元素在黑暗中可以识别，但细节和轮廓模糊不清。

主摄像头只支持30fps的1080p视频录制，这对于这个价格段来说是令人失望的。自动对焦反应非常快，但拍摄时应该忽略数码变焦，因为它会导致视频中出现卡顿。

一个特殊的功能是双图像模式，它允许用前置和主摄像头同时进行视频录制和照片拍摄。在手动模式下，用户可以手动设置光圈，但设置曝光时间或ISO值是不可能的。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera Main camera 5x zoom Low light

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

Honor 在Magic4 Lite 5G的色彩准确性方面做得很好。色调渲染得非常逼真，图像看起来也很自然。模拟显示的照度只有一勒克斯，清楚地表明Magic4 Lite 5G的相机在如此低的光线下不堪重负。

照片的锐度还可以，但很明显，它们在细节上有颗粒感，特别是与旗舰智能手机相比。

ColorChecker Honor Magic4 Lite: 5.96 ∆E min: 1.02 - max: 10.71 ∆E

配件和保修 -Honor 包括超级充电器

Honor 在交货范围内包括SuperCharge 66瓦快速充电器和一条USB电缆。还包括一个SIM卡工具和一份快速入门指南。然而，Magic4 Lite 5G并没有配备保护套。德国提供24个月的保修，其他地方可能有所不同，所以购买前一定要向供应商咨询。

输入设备和操作 -Honor 将指纹识别器集成到电源按钮中。

微软的SwiftKey被安装为智能手机的标准键盘，它在纵向和横向模式下都表现良好，很少有错误的输入。Honor Magic4 Lite 5G的电容式触摸屏可识别多达10次的同时触摸，并以240赫兹的采样率运作。在交付状态下应用了保护膜，它不会干扰输入；只有在边框过渡到玻璃的边缘才会引人注目。

指纹传感器已被集成到电源按钮中，并能快速、可靠地工作。此外，还有一个快速但不安全的2D面部识别。

Honor 还为Magic4 Lite 5G提供了单手操作，通过刷卡手势进行管理。然而，显示的图像非常大，用一只手到达所有区域是很困难的。该智能手机还支持一些可以用指关节进行的手势。用指关节双击可以拍摄屏幕，而用两个指关节双击则可以启动屏幕捕捉。这些命令可以在相应的子菜单中改变。

▶ load Youtube video

显示屏 -Honor ，Magic4 Lite 5G上只有LCD。

Honor Magic4 Lite 5G具有一个6.81英寸（17.3厘米）的LC显示屏，其工作刷新率高达120赫兹。动态速率控制也是可能的，它适应显示的内容。该面板提供三个级别：60、不寻常的80和120赫兹。在菜单中也可以固定在60或120赫兹。

面板的亮度通常足以满足日常使用，但在户外使用时，当屏幕细节变得不那么清晰时，就会出现对更高亮度的偏好。该设备支持HDR内容，但更大的亮度水平会使这一功能更加公正。测量结果显示，该面板在下部区域的亮度不如上部，但这在日常使用中并不明显。然而，评测设备在前置摄像头和显示屏边缘之间有一点阴影。

一个积极的方面是：我们无法在评测设备中确定任何PWM的闪烁。


507 cd/m²	521 cd/m²	466 cd/m²
514 cd/m²	552 cd/m²	485 cd/m²
514 cd/m²	536 cd/m²	509 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 552 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 511.6 cd/m² Minimum: 2.75 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 84 %
Center on Battery: 552 cd/m²
Contrast: 673:1 (Black: 0.82 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 3.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
94.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.14

	Honor Magic4 Lite TFT-LCD, 2388x1080, 6.8"	Samsung Galaxy A53 AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.5"	Realme 9 Pro IPS, 2412x1080, 6.6"	OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G IPS, 2412x1080, 6.6"	Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G TFT-LCD, 2400x1080, 6.6"	Motorola Moto G52 AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.6"
Screen		30%	-9%	-12%	-7%	36%
Brightness middle	552	718 30%	541 -2%	590 7%	504 -9%	655 19%
Brightness	512	730 43%	541 6%	561 10%	499 -3%	649 27%
Brightness Distribution	84	92 10%	96 14%	92 10%	91 8%	95 13%
Black Level *	0.82		0.44 46%	0.38 54%	0.72 12%
Contrast	673		1230 83%	1553 131%	700 4%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.2	1.62 26%	4.42 -101%	5.15 -134%	3.3 -50%	1.1 50%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	6	4.21 30%	8.77 -46%	10.35 -73%	6 -0%	2.58 57%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.5	2 43%	6 -71%	7.1 -103%	4.1 -17%	1.7 51%
Gamma	2.14 ^103%	2.156 ^102%	2.074 ^106%	2.143 ^103%	2.28 ^96%	2.212 ^99%
CCT	6410 ^101%	6545 ^99%	8049 ^81%	8540 ^76%	7041 ^92%	6557 ^99%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8738 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

总的来说，Honor Magic4 Lite 5G的显示屏显示了均衡的色彩再现。该显示器只在黄色和黄橙色的颜色上显示偏差。2D CalMAN测试的结果是sRGB色彩空间覆盖率高达94.5%。然而，该面板在黑值方面受到影响，因此对比度方面也受到影响。对比度只有673:1，所以显示器看起来总是有点苍白。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
14.99 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5.441 ms rise
14.99 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 9.547 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 32 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
31.23 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 14.33 ms rise
31.23 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 16.9 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 38 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Honor Magic4 Lite 5G的屏幕在户外和阳光下也是可读的。对于在阳光下的媒体消费来说，更多的亮度储备是可取的，但Honor ，在同类平均水平之内。只有三星Galaxy A53明显更亮。

液晶面板的可视角度稳定性很好。虽然从侧面看时屏幕会变暗，但没有颜色失真。自动亮度控制工作可靠，能够快速准确地调整照明。

性能 - 骁龙695 5G，功率充足

Honor Magic4 Lite 5G搭载了骁龙695 5G与一个 Adreno 6196GB的内存以及2GB的HONOR RAM Turbo。这款手机锐意进取的Realme 9 Pro和 OnePlus的Nord CE 2 Lite 5G也提供这种组合。两者都在Geekbench 5.4多核测试中击败了Honor ，而Magic4 Lite 5G则在BaseMark OS II中领先。总的来说，性能率处于稳定水平。一个有趣的观察。在性能模式下，我们的评测设备在Geekbench 5.4中取得的分数比正常模式下略差。

在日常使用中，Magic4 Lite 5G以流畅的操作和快速打开各种应用程序而给人留下深刻印象。打开应用程序时，既没有卡顿，也没有明显的等待时间。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone (126 - 2437, n=174, last 2 years)	1007 Points +50%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	740 Points +10%
Realme 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	697 Points +4%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	687 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (659 - 697, n=24)	676 Points +1%
Honor Magic4 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	672 Points
Honor Magic4 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	659 Points -2%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144	598 Points -11%
Motorola Moto G52 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	378 Points -44%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 8816, n=174, last 2 years)	3359 Points +100%
Realme 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	2016 Points +20%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	1998 Points +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (1663 - 2038, n=24)	1904 Points +13%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	1878 Points +12%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144	1809 Points +8%
Honor Magic4 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	1681 Points
Honor Magic4 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	1663 Points -1%
Motorola Moto G52 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	1573 Points -6%

Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (99654 - 1650926, n=104, last 2 years)	798401 Points +110%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	409976 Points +8%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	399726 Points +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (344344 - 416086, n=18)	389461 Points +3%
Honor Magic4 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	379630 Points
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144	353908 Points -7%
Motorola Moto G52 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	207780 Points -45%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Smartphone (4609 - 24088, n=191, last 2 years)	12972 Points +20%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	11470 Points +6%
Honor Magic4 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	10834 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6897 - 11732, n=23)	9629 Points -11%
Realme 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	9585 Points -12%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144	9402 Points -13%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	9363 Points -14%
Motorola Moto G52 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	6728 Points -38%

CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (187 - 1517, n=158, last 2 years)	885 Points +56%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	593 Points +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (521 - 606, n=18)	583 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	579 Points +2%
Honor Magic4 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	568 (619^min) Points
Motorola Moto G52 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	327 Points -42%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11976, n=152, last 2 years)	6326 Points +73%
Honor Magic4 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	3663 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (3171 - 3848, n=19)	3648 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	3626 Points -1%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	3596 Points -2%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144	3268 Points -11%
Motorola Moto G52 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	2573 Points -30%
System
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=152, last 2 years)	10181 Points +30%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	7976 Points +2%
Honor Magic4 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	7810 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6789 - 8231, n=19)	7725 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	7157 Points -8%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144	6361 Points -19%
Motorola Moto G52 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	5739 Points -27%
Memory
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=152, last 2 years)	6785 Points +66%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144	4589 Points +12%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	4311 Points +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (3167 - 4836, n=19)	4227 Points +3%
Honor Magic4 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	4092 Points
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	3855 Points -6%
Motorola Moto G52 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	3483 Points -15%
Graphics
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=152, last 2 years)	17165 Points +300%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	5178 Points +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (3975 - 4426, n=19)	4340 Points +1%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	4323 Points +1%
Honor Magic4 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	4295 Points
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144	2929 Points -32%
Motorola Moto G52 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	2182 Points -49%
Web
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2145, n=152, last 2 years)	1566 Points +19%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144	1334 Points +2%
Honor Magic4 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	1312 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (1078 - 1434, n=19)	1253 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	1210 Points -8%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	1125 Points -14%
Motorola Moto G52 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	917 Points -30%

AImark - Score v2.x
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144	9008 Points +79%
Realme 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	5287 Points +5%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	5265 Points +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (4924 - 5839, n=10)	5173 Points +3%
Honor Magic4 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	5027 Points
Motorola Moto G52 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	4859 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	4714 Points -6%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	621 Points +77%
Realme 9 Pro Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	353 Points +1%
Honor Magic4 Lite Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	351 Points
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	351 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	348 Points -1%
Motorola Moto G52 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	122 Points -65%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	636 Points +78%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	360 Points +1%
Realme 9 Pro Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	360 Points +1%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	360 Points +1%
Honor Magic4 Lite Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	357 Points
Motorola Moto G52 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	115 Points -68%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2275 Points +89%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1210 Points +1%
Honor Magic4 Lite Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1202 Points
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1201 Points 0%
Realme 9 Pro Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1199 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G52 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	463 Points -61%

3DMark / Wild Life Score
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2293 Points +90%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1235 Points +2%
Realme 9 Pro Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1209 Points 0%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1206 Points 0%
Honor Magic4 Lite Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1205 Points
Motorola Moto G52 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	457 Points -62%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2882 Points +7%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2822 Points +5%
Honor Magic4 Lite Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2696 Points
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2689 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G52 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2511 Points -7%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	3902 Points +45%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2710 Points +1%
Honor Magic4 Lite Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2690 Points
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2396 Points -11%
Motorola Moto G52 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	1153 Points -57%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	3546 Points +32%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2734 Points +2%
Honor Magic4 Lite Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2691 Points
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2489 Points -8%
Motorola Moto G52 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	1299 Points -52%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3804 Points +20%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3561 Points +12%
Realme 9 Pro Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3520 Points +11%
Honor Magic4 Lite Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3182 Points
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	3097 Points -3%
Motorola Moto G52 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2674 Points -16%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	3982 Points +42%
Realme 9 Pro Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2980 Points +6%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2973 Points +6%
Honor Magic4 Lite Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2812 Points
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2570 Points -9%
Motorola Moto G52 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	1242 Points -56%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	3746 Points +30%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3086 Points +7%
Realme 9 Pro Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3085 Points +7%
Honor Magic4 Lite Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2887 Points
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2770 Points -4%
Motorola Moto G52 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	1367 Points -53%

3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3553 Points +12%
Realme 9 Pro Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3411 Points +8%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3411 Points +8%
Honor Magic4 Lite Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3173 Points
Motorola Moto G52 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2644 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2261 Points -29%

3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	5172 Points +20%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4346 Points +1%
Realme 9 Pro Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4316 Points 0%
Honor Magic4 Lite Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4306 Points
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3846 Points -11%
Motorola Moto G52 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2067 Points -52%

3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4096 Points +3%
Realme 9 Pro Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4076 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	4021 Points +1%
Honor Magic4 Lite Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3989 Points
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3777 Points -5%
Motorola Moto G52 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2145 Points -46%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	3621 Points +28%
Realme 9 Pro Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2930 Points +4%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2917 Points +3%
Honor Magic4 Lite Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2827 Points
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2714 Points -4%
Motorola Moto G52 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	1357 Points -52%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	3939 Points +43%
Realme 9 Pro Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2817 Points +2%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2809 Points +2%
Honor Magic4 Lite Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2759 Points
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2546 Points -8%
Motorola Moto G52 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	1154 Points -58%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3529 Points +14%
Realme 9 Pro Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3410 Points +10%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3370 Points +9%
Honor Magic4 Lite Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3093 Points
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2823 Points -9%
Motorola Moto G52 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2738 Points -11%

3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	4645 Points +13%
Realme 9 Pro Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4237 Points +3%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4234 Points +3%
Honor Magic4 Lite Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4118 Points
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3965 Points -4%
Motorola Moto G52 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2190 Points -47%

3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	5510 Points +22%
Realme 9 Pro Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4528 Points +1%
Honor Magic4 Lite Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4502 Points
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4496 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4014 Points -11%
Motorola Moto G52 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2096 Points -53%

3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3801 Points +20%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3517 Points +11%
Realme 9 Pro Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3458 Points +9%
Honor Magic4 Lite Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3170 Points
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2997 Points -5%
Motorola Moto G52 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2696 Points -15%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	81 fps +5%
Honor Magic4 Lite Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	77 fps
Realme 9 Pro Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	60 fps -22%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	60 fps -22%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	56 fps -27%
Motorola Moto G52 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	36 fps -53%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Realme 9 Pro Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	95 fps +2%
Honor Magic4 Lite Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	93 fps
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	93 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	92 fps -1%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	66 fps -29%
Motorola Moto G52 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	41 fps -56%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	56 fps +40%
Realme 9 Pro Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	43 fps +8%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	42 fps +5%
Honor Magic4 Lite Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	40 fps
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	36 fps -10%
Motorola Moto G52 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	20 fps -50%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	61 fps +33%
Realme 9 Pro Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	48 fps +4%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	47 fps +2%
Honor Magic4 Lite Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	46 fps
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	40 fps -13%
Motorola Moto G52 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	22 fps -52%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	35 fps +21%
Realme 9 Pro Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	31 fps +7%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	30 fps +3%
Honor Magic4 Lite Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	29 fps
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	23 fps -21%
Motorola Moto G52 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	13 fps -55%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	38 fps +12%
Realme 9 Pro Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	35 fps +3%
Honor Magic4 Lite Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	34 fps
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	34 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	26 fps -24%
Motorola Moto G52 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	15 fps -56%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	20 fps +25%
Realme 9 Pro Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	17 fps +6%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	17 fps +6%
Honor Magic4 Lite Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	16 fps
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	13 fps -19%
Motorola Moto G52 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	7.4 fps -54%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	23 fps +15%
Realme 9 Pro Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	20 fps 0%
Honor Magic4 Lite Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	20 fps
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	19 fps -5%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	16 fps -20%
Motorola Moto G52 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	8.8 fps -56%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	15 fps +36%
Realme 9 Pro Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	12 fps +9%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	12 fps +9%
Honor Magic4 Lite Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	11 fps
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	9.3 fps -15%
Motorola Moto G52 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	5.3 fps -52%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	10 fps +25%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	8.1 fps +1%
Honor Magic4 Lite Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	8 fps
Realme 9 Pro Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	7.9 fps -1%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.2 fps -22%
Motorola Moto G52 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	1.4 fps -82%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	23 fps +28%
Realme 9 Pro Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	19 fps +6%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	19 fps +6%
Honor Magic4 Lite Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	18 fps
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	15 fps -17%
Motorola Moto G52 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	9.5 fps -47%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	26 fps +24%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	22 fps +5%
Realme 9 Pro Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	21 fps 0%
Honor Magic4 Lite Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	21 fps
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	17 fps -19%
Motorola Moto G52 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	5.1 fps -76%

浏览器基准测试中没有惊喜。我们的评测设备总是落在比较设备的中场。它从来不是第一，但也不是最后，因此保持了我们在以前的基准测试中的印象。

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=162, last 2 years)	121 Points +108%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (48.6 - 105.3, n=19)	71.2 Points +23%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G (Chrome 103.0.5060.129)	64.165 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chrome 101)	63.5 Points +9%
Honor Magic4 Lite (Chrome 103)	58.042 Points
Realme 9 Pro (Chrome 99)	48.6 Points -16%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G (Chrome 96)	43.83 Points -24%
Motorola Moto G52 (Chrome 103)	40.743 Points -30%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=148, last 2 years)	137.4 runs/min +207%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (38.7 - 80.1, n=16)	54 runs/min +21%
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chome 101)	51.24 runs/min +15%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G (Chrome 103.0.5060.129)	47.11 runs/min +5%
Honor Magic4 Lite (Chrome 103)	44.7 runs/min
Realme 9 Pro (Chome 99)	41 runs/min -8%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G (Chrome 96)	39.8 runs/min -11%
Motorola Moto G52 (Chrome 103)	37.48 runs/min -16%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)	148.7 Points +69%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (75 - 156, n=12)	101 Points +15%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G (Chrome 103.0.5060.129)	96 Points +9%
Honor Magic4 Lite (Chrome 102)	88 Points
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chrome 101)	69 Points -22%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G (Chrome 96)	62 Points -30%
Motorola Moto G52 (Chrome 103)	60 Points -32%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years)	37278 Points +75%
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chrome 101)	24159 Points +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (17849 - 31647, n=21)	24051 Points +13%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G (Chrome 103.0.5060.129)	22285 Points +5%
Honor Magic4 Lite (Chrome 102)	21302 Points
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G (Chrome 96)	19010 Points -11%
Motorola Moto G52 (Chrome 103)	12386 Points -42%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Motorola Moto G52 (Chrome 103)	3183.3 ms * -61%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G (Chrome 96)	2410 ms * -22%
Honor Magic4 Lite (Chrome 102)	1978.9 ms *
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G (Chrome 103.0.5060.129)	1922.7 ms * +3%
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chrome 101)	1920.3 ms * +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (1298 - 2501, n=18)	1769 ms * +11%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=161, last 2 years)	1563 ms * +21%

* ... smaller is better

Honor 智能手机的存储大小为128GB，其中17.06GB在交付状态下已经被占用。Honor 没有提供任何其他存储变体或通过存储卡的扩展可能性。

在内存速度方面，Honor Magic4 Lite 5G落后于竞争对手。只有 Realme 9 Pro在四个测试类别中的三个方面甚至更慢。所有其他对比设备都更快，而且三星的Galaxy A 53显著更快。总的来说，Magic4 Lite 5G仍然低于同级别的平均水平，在连续阅读方面的赤字尤其大。

	Honor Magic4 Lite	Samsung Galaxy A53	Realme 9 Pro	OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G	Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G	Motorola Moto G52	Average 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		31%	-23%	12%	34%	26%	35%	186%
Sequential Read 256KB	488.66	510.1 4%	494 1%	509.21 4%	964 97%	893.44 83%	728 ?(303 - 1038, n=71) 49%	1847 ?(226 - 4512, n=193, last 2 years) 278%
Sequential Write 256KB	385.52	486.7 26%	105.3 -73%	482.15 25%	471 22%	503.56 31%	527 ?(103.2 - 903, n=71) 37%	1436 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=193, last 2 years) 272%
Random Read 4KB	155.16	229.9 48%	148.3 -4%	179.02 15%	148.8 -4%	98.99 -36%	191.7 ?(89.3 - 297, n=71) 24%	277 ?(22.2 - 483, n=193, last 2 years) 79%
Random Write 4KB	143.61	210.8 47%	120.4 -16%	147.46 3%	171.8 20%	182.92 27%	185.8 ?(62.6 - 419, n=71) 29%	308 ?(9.4 - 753, n=193, last 2 years) 114%

游戏 - Magic4 Lite 5G稳定，但帧数很少

Honor Magic4 Lite 5G的游戏性能可以说是稳固的。目前的标题，如PUBG移动或英雄联盟。Wild Rift在该设备上运行流畅。只有非常零星的帧数下降发生，正如GameBench的测量结果所示。然而，在该设备上只能选择低帧率和细节水平。大显示屏为游戏提供了很多乐趣，底部的单声道扬声器被手指部分覆盖。

Honor Magic4 Lite; Dead Trigger 2; 1.8.18: Ø59.8 (59-60)

Honor Magic4 Lite; League of Legends: Wild Rift; 3.2.0.5531: Ø29.9 (28-30)

Honor Magic4 Lite; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 2.1.0: Ø39.8 (37-41)

Honor Magic4 Lite; PUBG Mobile; Balanced; 2.1.0: Ø39.9 (37-41)

Honor Magic4 Lite; PUBG Mobile; HD; 2.0.0: Ø29.9 (24-31)

排放 - Magic4 Lite 5G保持低温

温度

Honor Magic4 Lite 5G在日常使用中从未变得异常温暖。即使在炎热的夏天，也可以无限制地使用。在重载期间，如游戏时，温度只在设备的个别区域上升，特别是摄像头周围。

Honor 智能手机在3DMark压力测试中的表现并不突出。在整个测试过程中，性能保持在一个稳定的水平。然而，这在这个性能级别中并不罕见，正如与竞争设备的比较所显示的那样，这些设备都在测试中没有波动。

Max. Load

Idle


35.8 °C	34.6 °C	36.9 °C
35.2 °C	31.9 °C	34.6 °C
34.2 °C	31.9 °C	33.6 °C

Maximum: 36.9 °C
Average: 34.3 °C


30.2 °C	32.2 °C	34.3 °C
30.9 °C	31.7 °C	33.8 °C
30.9 °C	32.1 °C	32.9 °C

Maximum: 34.3 °C
Average: 32.1 °C

Power Supply (max.) 30.4 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.3 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.9 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.3 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.6 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Honor Magic4 Lite Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.8 %
Honor Magic4 Lite Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.8 (7.21^min) % 0%
Motorola Moto G52 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	99.7 (2.68^min) % 0%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.6 (7.36^min) % 0%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	99.6 (13.7^min) % 0%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.6 (7.21^min) % 0%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Honor Magic4 Lite Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.2 %
Honor Magic4 Lite Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.1 (2.14^min) % 0%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.1 (2.14^min) % 0%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99 (2.15^min) % 0%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	97.8 (3.75^min) % -1%
Motorola Moto G52 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	% -100%

Honor Magic4 Lite Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø2.15 (2.14-2.16)

OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø2.15 (2.14-2.16)

Honor Magic4 Lite Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.22 (7.21-7.23)

OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.21 (7.21-7.23)

发言人

Honor Magic4 Lite 5G只在设备底部有一个单声道扬声器。顶部有一个看起来像扬声器的元件，但这只是听筒，不用于媒体播放。安装的扬声器声音很大，但缺乏任何低音或低频，整体听起来很单薄，特别是在高音量时。

在测试中，通过蓝牙进行的声音输出工作无懈可击。然而，所提供的音频编解码器的选择一点都不多（SBC、AAC、aptX和LDAC）。Magic4 Lite 5G不提供插孔输出，但可以通过USB端口连接有线耳机。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Honor Magic4 Lite audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.2% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 54% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 70% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Battery Life - Long runtimes, faster Honor SuperCharger

消耗功率

Honor 智能手机的耗电量给人一种混合的感觉。当不需要负载时，Magic4 Lite 5G取得了非常好的数值，表现好于OnePlus CE 2 Lite G5采用相同的芯片组。然而，该智能手机的功耗在负载下比这个级别的竞争对手增加得更多。OnePlus和Realme表明，在软件方面仍有优化的潜力。所有基准测试都在性能模式下运行。

一个很大的优点是附带的66瓦电源，它可以让Magic4 Lite 5G在53分钟内从5%充到100%，甚至不会变得温热。不支持无线充电。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.07 / 0.16 Watt
Idle	0.56 / 2.47 / 2.52 Watt
Load	4.83 / 5.68 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Honor Magic4 Lite 4800 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A53 5000 mAh	OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G 5000 mAh	Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G 5000 mAh	Motorola Moto G52 5000 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-5%	26%	14%	21%	4%	-18%
Idle Minimum *	0.56	0.9 -61%	0.8 -43%	0.51 9%	0.8 -43%	0.886 ?(0.56 - 1.2, n=18) -58%	0.893 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=154, last 2 years) -59%
Idle Average *	2.47	1.3 47%	1 60%	1.96 21%	1.1 55%	1.76 ?(0.91 - 4.76, n=18) 29%	1.449 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=154, last 2 years) 41%
Idle Maximum *	2.52	1.6 37%	1.4 44%	2.01 20%	1.5 40%	1.92 ?(0.98 - 4.79, n=18) 24%	1.608 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=154, last 2 years) 36%
Load Average *	4.83	5.7 -18%	2.4 50%	3.86 20%	2.9 40%	3.86 ?(2.4 - 9.52, n=18) 20%	6.5 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=149, last 2 years) -35%
Load Maximum *	5.68	7.3 -29%	4.6 19%	5.62 1%	5 12%	5.45 ?(4.32 - 9.92, n=18) 4%	9.87 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=149, last 2 years) -74%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Honor Magic4 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G: Ø3.17 (1.082-5.77)

OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G: Ø2.65 (0.76-4.99)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

Honor Magic4 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.68 (3.39-4.38)

OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.2 (2.49-4.46)

Honor Magic4 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.299 (1.225-1.556)

OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.962 (0.785-1.444)

电池寿命

Honor 在Magic4 Lite 5G中安装了4,800毫安时的电池，这比配备5,000毫安时电池的对比设备略小。因此，在大多数情况下，竞争设备具有更好的性能值。然而，，以良好的运行时间而令人信服，特别是在日常使用中。Honor

在设备负载不大的情况下，电池运行时间特别令人高兴，因为Honor ，可以保持低能耗。与快速充电器相结合，这确保了Magic4 Lite 5G只需要很少和短时间的插电。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		27h 25min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 102)		12h 40min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		16h 26min
Load (maximum brightness)		5h 17min

	Honor Magic4 Lite 4800 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A53 5000 mAh	Realme 9 Pro 5000 mAh	OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G 5000 mAh	Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G 5000 mAh	Motorola Moto G52 5000 mAh
Battery Runtime		15%	38%	19%	24%	33%
Reader / Idle	1645	2431 48%		1985 21%	2722 65%	2183 33%
H.264	986	1146 16%		1255 27%	1008 2%	1274 29%
WiFi v1.3	760	886 17%	1047 38%	1064 40%	966 27%	1102 45%
Load	317	246 -22%		277 -13%	322 2%	398 26%

Pros

+ 良好的电池寿命

+ 快速充电/包括快速充电器

+ 120赫兹显示

+ 双5G功能

Cons

- 单声道扬声器，音质较差

- 没有变焦/广角摄像头

- 没有关于更新的信息

评语。良好的Honor 智能手机，没有特殊功能

在审查中。 Honor Magic4 Lite 5G。样品设备由德国Honor 提供。

Honor Magic4 Lite 5G是一款不错的中档智能手机。然而，这篇评论显示，它与制造商的旗舰机除了名字相同外，没有更多的共同点。如果我们相应地调整我们的期望，Magic4 Lite 5G的120赫兹大显示屏特别令人高兴。该骁龙695 5G工作流畅，足以应付游戏，而且不会发热。电池寿命长，充电快，交货范围内甚至包括一个合适的快速充电器。

对相机的评价有分歧。背面三个镜头中的两个更多的是用于广告目的；只有主摄像头是可用的，而广角和变焦镜头则完全没有。另一方面，用Magic4 Lite 5G可以可靠地进行自拍。这款智能手机的单声道扬声器声音很大，但它显然缺乏音量。安装的GNSS解决方案在日常使用中也能发挥作用，但不适合需要精确的任务。

总的来说，Magic4 Lite 5G是一款不错的智能手机，但并没有在竞争中脱颖而出。

电池比大多数竞争对手略小，屏幕使用LCD技术而不是OLED。这款智能手机没有任何真正的缺陷，但它并没有提供许多购买的好理由，其建议零售价约为349美元。该三星Galaxy A53有相同的价格，并且在几乎所有类别中都有更好的表现。这款手机一加Nord CE 2 Lite具有相同的处理器和稍大的电池，甚至可以卖到275美元左右。

价格和可用性

Honor Magic4 Lite 5G通过制造商的网上商店直接销售，有时还附带免费的配件，如配套的保护套。然而，目前供应似乎仅限于欧洲大陆的国家，如France,西班牙,意大利,匈牙利和罗马尼亚(这个名单并不详尽）。

其他零售商如亚马逊可能有该智能手机的库存，如英国亚马逊售价273.48英镑（截至2022年8月14日的价格）。

Honor Magic4 Lite - 08/08/2022 v7 ^(old)
Benedikt Winkel

Chassis

81%

Keyboard

67 / 75 → 89%

Pointing Device

89%

Connectivity

48 / 70 → 68%

Weight

88%

Battery

90%

Display

86%

Games Performance

32 / 64 → 50%

Application Performance

69 / 86 → 80%

Temperature

91%

Noise

100%

Audio

72 / 90 → 80%

Camera

48%

Average

74%

79%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Jacob Fisher - Translator - 1344 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2022

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 460014 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > Honor Magic4 Lite 5G评论。拥有大显示屏和强大电池的智能手机

Benedikt Winkel, 2022-08-16 (Update: 2024-08-15)

潜在的竞争对手比较

外壳 - Magic4 Lite，带塑料后盖

尺寸比较

设备 -Honor ，有双5G，但没有microSD

软件 - Magic UI 4.2 基于Android 11

通信和全球导航卫星系统--速度适中，不受制于人

电话和语音质量

摄像机 - 在Honor 摄像机设置中只有一个可用的镜头

配件和保修 -Honor 包括超级充电器

输入设备和操作 -Honor 将指纹识别器集成到电源按钮中。

显示屏 -Honor ，Magic4 Lite 5G上只有LCD。

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

性能 - 骁龙695 5G，功率充足

游戏 - Magic4 Lite 5G稳定，但帧数很少

排放 - Magic4 Lite 5G保持低温

温度

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

发言人

Honor Magic4 Lite audio analysis

OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G audio analysis

Battery Life - Long runtimes, faster Honor SuperCharger

消耗功率

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

评语。良好的Honor 智能手机，没有特殊功能

价格和可用性

More articles related to this device

Price comparison