realme 9 Pro智能手机评测--终于有了5G的中端产品
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
80.5 % | 04/2022 | Realme 9 Pro SD 695 5G, Adreno 619 | 195 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.60" | 2412x1080 | |
82.2 % | 04/2021 | Realme 8 Pro SD 720G, Adreno 618 | 176 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.40" | 2400x1080 | |
78.6 % | 02/2022 | Samsung Galaxy M32 Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2 | 180 g | 128 GB eMMC Flash | 6.40" | 2400x1080 | |
84.1 % | 03/2022 | OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4 | 173 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.43" | 2400x1080 | |
86 % | 04/2021 | Xiaomi Poco F3 SD 870, Adreno 650 | 196 g | 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.67" | 2400x1080 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳和功能--RAM的附加费用很难得到回报
我们想在这次评测中仔细看看的realme 9 Pro,已经被更高质量的机型取代realme 9 Pro+。这是否意味着,与 realme 8 Pro我们必须接受一些妥协?是的,也不是:一方面,现在有了5G,但另一方面,你必须做的是没有AMOLED屏幕。
如果你不是专家,你将很难比较realme 9 Pro和 9 Pro Plus来区分它们:外壳第一眼看上去几乎相同,但拥有6.6英寸屏幕的9 Pro要大一些,也比它的姐妹机型重195克。Realme为两款设备提供相同的颜色版本。极光绿、午夜黑和日出蓝,尽管后者在测试时很难在中欧得到。
我们的黑色测试设备让光线反射在背面跳舞,这也很容易受到指纹的影响。扭动时,IPS显示屏上会出现亮斑,但机箱在其他方面具有稳定的构造。
Realme提供了2种配置变体。
- realme 9 Pro 128 GB大容量存储/6 GB RAM:319欧元
- realme 9 Pro 128 GB大容量存储/8 GB内存:349欧元
为了多出2GB的内存,值得多付30欧元吗?也许不值得,因为6GB应该完全满足绝大多数的应用程序。从大容量存储中分配虚拟内存的可能性可能更像是一种营销技巧。虽然芯片组支持蓝牙5.2,但realme只指定了蓝牙5.1,而且还有一个用于近场通信的NFC芯片。
通过microSD卡扩展内存是可能的,但必须牺牲两个SIM卡插槽中的一个来实现。读卡器总体来说相当慢。
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Samsung Galaxy M32 (Angelbird V60) | |
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G (Angelbird V60) | |
Realme 9 Pro (Angelbird V60) | |
Average of class Smartphone (7.7 - 77, n=87, last 2 years) |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
通信、软件和操作 - 稳定,但不是那么快的WLAN
5G已经上马,realme承诺,你可以在5G模式下同时使用两张SIM卡。此外,还支持5G Standalone,这使得速度更高。支持的LTE频率范围很广,所以这款智能手机可以在许多国家用于移动互联网。在接收方面,在简短的抽样测试中,该手机在4G网络中的表现处于平均水平。
在WiFi方面,realme也没有充分使用 骁龙695骁龙695的官方能力为WiFi 6,但制造商在realme 9 Pro中将其保留在WiFi 5。因此,在我们的测试中,使用参考路由器华硕GT-AXE11000的最大可实现速度明显慢于在 一加北方CE 2, 或 小米Poco F3,但仍与其他级别的代表相当。因此,在WLAN方面,realme 9 Pro在其价格范围内并不慢,但它也没有积极地脱颖而出。
realme UI 3是基于ColorOS,而ColorOS又是基于目前的Android 12。在测试时,安全补丁是2022年2月的,因此是相当最新的。该软件很干净,提供了许多设置,但预装了一些广告应用程序。至少在不需要的时候,这些可以很容易地被删除。
触摸屏提供了良好的滑行性能,自适应的120赫兹显示使操作非常流畅。外壳右侧的指纹传感器能非常迅速地解锁智能手机,但它在识别注册的手指方面并不总是可靠的。面部识别也可用于解锁。
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Xiaomi Poco F3 | |
Samsung Galaxy M32 | |
Realme 8 Pro | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Xiaomi Poco F3 | |
Samsung Galaxy M32 | |
Realme 8 Pro | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G | |
Realme 9 Pro | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G | |
Realme 9 Pro |
照相机 - 灵活,但系统平庸
与前代产品相比 realme 8 Pro主摄像头失去了百万像素和对模糊效果的支持,但后者无论如何只有可疑的用途。与之相比 realme 9 Pro+,没有光学图像稳定功能。然而,realme仍然设法在9 Pro中安装了一个灵活的相机系统,有一个广角和微距相机。
主摄像头的分辨率为6400万像素,但默认情况下只使用1/4的分辨率,并以更高的感光度创建更大的像素。在与花的对比照片中,可以立即看到相机不是一流的事实:红色对相机来说是传统的困难颜色,但高质量的对比智能手机管理的细节比我们的测试设备多得多。周围的图像看起来仍然丰富多彩,也相当清晰,但像天空这样的大面积区域显示得不如高质量的相机干净。
自动对焦在弱光下很快就会出现问题,但基本的成像性能仍然存在,所以你仍然可以看到颜色。相机软件很丰富,有许多模式和过滤器。
视频可以以1080p和最多30帧的速度录制,曝光调整和自动对焦在这里工作得相当可靠。数字变焦可以以不同的速度执行,这很好。
其余的镜头做得还不错,但广角镜头不应该被放大太多。这同样适用于前置摄像头的自拍,尽管它们可以用于网络。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain cameraLow lightWideangle camera![ColorChecker](fileadmin/_processed_/1/1/csm_Farbchart_high_1deb059b1a.jpg)
![ColorChecker](fileadmin/_processed_/a/d/csm_Farbchart_low_2aee99b388.jpg)
显示屏 - realme 9 Pro中的IPS而不是AMOLED
realme 9 Pro不得不使用IPS显示屏;AMOLED屏幕现在只留给了realme 9 Pro+。realme 9 Pro+.屏幕的亮度相当高,平均为541cd/m²,但它缺乏像三星或小米那样的亮度提升模式,便于户外使用。
亮度分布相当均匀,但在 "自然 "模式下的色彩再现只是一般的准确。特别是明亮的颜色会出现偏蓝。我们没有注意到PWM的闪烁。
|
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 541 cd/m²
Contrast: 1230:1 (Black: 0.44 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.42 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.95
ΔE Greyscale 6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.074
Realme 9 Pro IPS, 2412x1080, 6.6" | Realme 8 Pro AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.4" | Samsung Galaxy M32 Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.4" | OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G OLED, 2400x1080, 6.4" | Xiaomi Poco F3 AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Response Times | 74% | 66% | 65% | 89% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 42 | 8 ? 81% | 10 ? 76% | 6 ? 86% | 3.6 ? 91% |
Response Time Black / White * | 18 | 6 ? 67% | 8 ? 56% | 10 ? 44% | 2.4 ? 87% |
PWM Frequency | 114.7 | 362.3 ? | 354.6 | 490.2 ? | |
Screen | 7% | 38% | 16% | 61% | |
Brightness middle | 541 | 581 7% | 712 32% | 601 11% | 889 64% |
Brightness | 541 | 563 4% | 720 33% | 596 10% | 902 67% |
Brightness Distribution | 96 | 86 -10% | 95 -1% | 98 2% | 95 -1% |
Black Level * | 0.44 | ||||
Contrast | 1230 | ||||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.42 | 4.34 2% | 1.94 56% | 3.35 24% | 0.9 80% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.77 | 7.15 18% | 5.81 34% | 6.72 23% | 1.9 78% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6 | 4.9 18% | 1.5 75% | 4.6 23% | 1.3 78% |
Gamma | 2.074 106% | 2.327 95% | 2.089 105% | 2.363 93% | 2.26 97% |
CCT | 8049 81% | 7658 85% | 6593 99% | 7372 88% | 6614 98% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 41% /
23% | 52% /
45% | 41% /
28% | 75% /
68% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
18 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ ms rise | |
↘ ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 35 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.2 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ ms rise | |
↘ ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.2 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17373 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
性能、排放和电池寿命
该 高通骁龙695是一个相对较新的中端SoC。它为realme 9 Pro带来了体面的性能,但不能完全跟上这个级别的最佳代表。因此,大多数基准测试的结果是好的,但并不突出。在日常使用中,其性能通常足以满足系统中的流畅导航和有点复杂的应用程序。
负载下43.2℃的最高温度相当明显,在更高的环境温度下可能会增加更多。
底部边缘的单声道扬声器做得很好,但过度强调高音非常强烈,因此导致在高音量下的声音有些令人不快。至少该扬声器可以变得相当响亮。通过3.5毫米音频输出可以获得更好的声音,其DAC甚至通过了Hi-Res Audio认证。音频信号也可以通过蓝牙输出,目前所有重要的编解码器都支持。
Realme为其智能手机提供了内部充电技术Dart Charge,最大功率为33瓦特。因此,它的充电速度明显慢于 Realme 9 Pro+60瓦的充电速度,但也明显快于例如 三星Galaxy A52s它的电源很弱。与realme 8 Pro相比,它的电池更大。 realme 8 Pro是明显的,但并不像人们期望的那样多。尽管如此,realme 9 Pro在我们的Wi-Fi电池测试中取得了非常好的17:27小时的成绩,在节约使用的情况下,应该可以在没有电源插座的情况下使用数天。
GFXBench | |
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Realme 9 Pro | |
Realme 8 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy M32 | |
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G | |
Xiaomi Poco F3 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (18 - 38, n=23) | |
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 123, n=202, last 2 years) | |
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Realme 9 Pro | |
Realme 8 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy M32 | |
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G | |
Xiaomi Poco F3 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (21 - 23, n=23) | |
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 229, n=202, last 2 years) | |
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Realme 9 Pro | |
Realme 8 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy M32 | |
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G | |
Xiaomi Poco F3 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (11 - 24, n=23) | |
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 119, n=202, last 2 years) | |
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Realme 9 Pro | |
Realme 8 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy M32 | |
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G | |
Xiaomi Poco F3 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (7.7 - 8.2, n=23) | |
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 94, n=202, last 2 years) |
Realme 9 Pro | Realme 8 Pro | Samsung Galaxy M32 | OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G | Xiaomi Poco F3 | Average 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | 4% | -12% | 241% | 203% | 130% | 408% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 494 | 474 -4% | 297.3 -40% | 999 102% | 1378 179% | 722 ? 46% | 1719 ? 248% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 105.3 | 191.7 82% | 178.7 70% | 857 714% | 684 550% | 519 ? 393% | 1328 ? 1161% |
Random Read 4KB | 148.3 | 98.5 -34% | 98 -34% | 253.4 71% | 208 40% | 190.1 ? 28% | 265 ? 79% |
Random Write 4KB | 120.4 | 84.8 -30% | 68.8 -43% | 212.9 77% | 170.6 42% | 183.3 ? 52% | 292 ? 143% |
温度
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.5 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.2 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.8 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
演讲者
Realme 9 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 31% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 51% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi Poco F3 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电池寿命
Realme 9 Pro 5000 mAh | Realme 8 Pro 4500 mAh | Samsung Galaxy M32 5000 mAh | OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G 4500 mAh | Xiaomi Poco F3 4520 mAh | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | ||||||
WiFi Websurfing | 1047 | 1006 -4% | 1098 5% | 962 -8% | 805 -23% | 957 ? -9% |
Pros
Cons
判决书
realme 9 Pro有几个亮点:电池寿命很好,外壳看起来不错,处理器有很大的能量。然而,对于realme的中端手机来说,这永远都不足以达到同级别的顶级水平,因此,它仍然是一款无法激发灵感的坚实手机。指纹传感器有些不准确,光学防抖等功能缺失也是原因之一。
同时,Realme手机没有任何严重的弱点,因此它可以在低价位上相当值得:稳定的底盘、几乎没有波动的WLAN速度和良好的性能率,以及带有自适应帧率的120赫兹屏幕,使智能手机在日常使用中很好地使用。
Realme通过9 Pro带来了一款坚实的中端手机,具有较长的运行时间,但在其价格范围内还有强大的替代品。
相比之下 锐美9 Pro Plus你必须接受一些妥协:较弱的IPS屏幕,略低的性能,较慢的充电速度,质量更低的扬声器,以及没有Wi-Fi 6。因此,你应该考虑在姐妹机型上多投资50欧元。也许还值得一看的是 小米Poco F3它的功率要大得多。
价格和可用性
Realme 9 Pro可以直接从制造商处订购。但只有绿色和黑色。在测试时,配备6GB工作内存的变体约为320欧元(约320美元),而配备8GB工作内存的设备价格为349欧元(约349美元)。你可以在amazon.de买到更便宜的智能手机。,notebooksbilliger.de, 或cyberport.de.
Realme 9 Pro
-
03/28/2022 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt