Honor Magic4 Pro 5G评测--功能多样的摄像智能手机，功能丰富

Name: Honor Magic4 Pro
Brand: Honor

强势复出。

Honor Magic4 Pro是一款具有多种功能的高端智能手机，是前华为子公司被收购后的第一款机型。由于没有贸易限制，它提供了一个伟大的功能集，重点是相机设置。

Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 07/14/2022 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

5G Android Smartphone Touchscreen

尽管Honor Magic系列在去年得到了恢复，但我们测试设备的前辈魔法3 Pro由于持续的贸易限制而没有进入欧洲。现在，这个前华为子公司已被出售给一个中国投资集团Honor ，不再属于美国的制裁范围，因此能够采购现代芯片组、5G无线电和谷歌移动服务（GMS）。

Honor Magic4 Pro与前代产品差别不大，采用相同的设计语言。然而，显示屏的尺寸略有增加，SoC和相机传感器都得到了升级。方便的是，现在有了IP认证和大功率有线和无线充电。此外，Magic4 Pro是少数利用3D面部识别的Android 智能手机之一。

Test device courtesy of Honor

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Honor Magic4 Pro (Magic Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 8 x 1.8 - 3 GHz, Cortex-X2 / A710 / A510 (Kryo) Waipio

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 730

Memory

8 GB

, LPDDR5

Display

6.81 inch 19.54:9, 2848 x 1312 pixel 460 PPI, Capacitive, 10 multi touch points, OLED, LTPO: 1 to 120 Hz, 1920 Hz DC-Dimming, HDR10+, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz

Storage

256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB

, 235.05 GB free

Connections

1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrum, OTG, IR-Blaster

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 26, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78, 79), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 9.15 x 163.6 x 74.7

Battery

4600 mAh Lithium-Polymer

Charging

wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 12

Camera

Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.8, 23 mm, 1/1.56", 1.0 µm) + 50 MP (ultrawide, 122°, f/2.2, 1/2.5") + 64 MP (3.5x optical zoom, f/3.5, 90 mm, 1/2.0", 0.7 µm); Ultra HD video @ 60 FPS; Camera2-API: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 12 MPix (f/2.4, 1.22 µm) + TOF 3D

Additional features

Speakers: Dual, Keyboard: Onscreen, 100W charger, bumper, USB cable (Type-A to Type-C), SIM tool, Magic UI 6, 24 Months Warranty, IP68, body SAR: 1.25 W/kg, head SAR: 0.74 W/kg, DRM Widevine L1; GNSS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (L1), BeiDou (B1, B2a, B1C), Galileo (E1, E5a), NavIC (L5), fanless, waterproof

Weight

215 g, Power Supply: 175 g

Price

1100 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
88.6 % v7 ^(old)	07 / 2022	Honor Magic4 Pro SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730	215 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.81"	2848x1312
87.6 % v7 ^(old)	02 / 2022	Xiaomi 12 Pro SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730	204 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.73"	3200x1440
88.1 % v7 ^(old)	06 / 2022	OnePlus 10 Pro SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730	200.5 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.70"	3216x1440
89.4 % v7 ^(old)	03 / 2022	Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920	228 g	128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.80"	3088x1440
90.5 % v7 ^(old)	10 / 2021	Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max A15, A15 GPU 5-Core	238 g	128 GB NVMe	6.70"	2778x1284
89.2 % v7 ^(old)	04 / 2022	Google Pixel 6 Pro Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20	210 g	128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.70"	3120x1440
89.2 % v7 ^(old)	04 / 2022	Oppo Find X5 Pro SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730	221 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.70"	3216x1440

外壳 - 大量的玻璃，与Mate系列相似

Honor Magic4 Pro有黑色和青色两种颜色，另外还有白色、金色和橙色版本，可能会根据地区的不同而不同。我们的测试设备是一个青色型号，根据数据表，其厚度为9.15毫米（约0.36英寸）。我们测量了9.45毫米（约0.37英寸）。由于相机设置占用了很多空间，智能手机在平坦的表面上放置时不会左右摇晃。1.7毫米（约0.07英寸），摄像头的凸起不是太明显。

我们对其做工非常满意。纤细的金属框架使其具有坚固和优质的外观。玻璃显示屏与框架平齐，略微倾斜的玻璃边缘使Honor ，看起来几乎没有框架，93%的屏占比进一步加强了这种印象。虽然间隙紧密而均匀，但Magic4 Pro在从四角扭转时有明显的吱吱声。

框架内有一个凹陷的SIM卡托盘盖，颜色相同，正面是金属。托盘本身由黑色塑料组成，可接受两张纳米SIM卡。电池是固定的，用户不能更换。Honor Magic4 Pro通过了IP68认证，既防水又防尘。

尺寸比较

Google Pixel 6 Pro Honor Magic4 Pro Xiaomi 12 Pro Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Oppo Find X5 Pro OnePlus 10 Pro Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max DIN A6 ❌

连接性 -Honor 带有USB 3.2和红外辐射器的智能手机

尽管Honor Magic4 Pro的USB 3.2端口（第1代）能够以高达5Gb/s的速度传输数据，但包装中只包括一条USB 2.0电缆。该接口既支持OTG，也支持视频输出到HDMI和DisplayPort设备。在这里，用户能够选择简单的屏幕镜像或使用集成的桌面模式。

扩展存储空间是不可能的。也没有FM接收器或通知LED。不过，如果需要的话，后者可以被永远在线的显示屏的功能所取代。Honor 手机的连接性非常好，有现代蓝牙5.2、NFC和一个可用于控制多媒体设备、相机或空调的红外辐射器。

软件 - 谷歌Android 12，包括桌面模式

Android 12是选择的操作系统，上面有制造商自己的Magic UI 6.0层。熟悉过去智能手机的用户将感到宾至如归。由于谷歌的应用和服务不再缺失，Play商店和谷歌支付都再次可用。Honor

Magic4 Pro上只有几个预装的第三方应用程序，包括Netflix和TikTok，它们可以很容易地被卸载。在写这篇文章时，安全补丁可以追溯到2022年5月1日，因此它们是相当新的。Honor ，承诺进行两次主要的Android 版本更新，因此可以达到Android 14，安全补丁可以使用4年。

如果智能手机通过可选的电缆连接到显示器或电视上，可以使用集成的桌面模式。虽然在我们的测试中工作良好，但我们无法在这种模式下访问Play Store或Chrome。其他浏览器的工作没有任何问题。

通信和GNSS - Magic4 Pro，带5G和Wi-Fi 6

在通信方面，Honor Magic4 Pro有一个小小的缺点，因为不支持最新的Wi-Fi 6E标准，因此不能使用6-GHz。相比之下，Honor 确实支持VHT160，使其与我们的参考路由器华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000之间的传输速度不仅一致，而且即使在5-GHz网络中也非常快。

蜂窝网络的所有主要标准，包括5G sub6都可以使用。由于支持的频率数量很高，用户应该能够从世界上大多数国家访问网络。

Networking
Honor Magic4 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1369 (min: 720) MBit/s ∼79%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1499 (min: 1195) MBit/s ∼88%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1465 (min: 1307) MBit/s ∼84%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1214 (min: 516) MBit/s ∼71%
OnePlus 10 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000	944 (min: 859) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	893 (min: 835) MBit/s ∼52%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000	716 (min: 539) MBit/s ∼41%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	521 (min: 311) MBit/s ∼30%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1704 (min: 852) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1702 (min: 1642) MBit/s ∼100%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
iperf3 transmit AX12	875 (min: 836) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AX12	718 (min: 707) MBit/s ∼100%
Google Pixel 6 Pro Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1736 (min: 874) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1710 (min: 876) MBit/s ∼100%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000	820 (min: 799) MBit/s ∼47%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	890 (min: 433) MBit/s ∼52%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 receive AXE11000	714 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼41%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	729 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼43%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1440 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼85%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1371 (min: 668) MBit/s ∼81%

Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Samsung Exynos 2200, Samsung Xclipse 920; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1676 (852-1767)

Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Samsung Exynos 2200, Samsung Xclipse 920; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1694 (1642-1735)

Honor Magic4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1344 (720-1445)

Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Samsung Exynos 2200, Samsung Xclipse 920; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø715 (539-791)

Honor Magic4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1499 (1195-1604)

Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Samsung Exynos 2200, Samsung Xclipse 920; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø510 (311-704)

出于地理定位的目的，Magic4 Pro可以接入广泛的卫星网络，甚至可以实现三重连接。在户外，卫星上行链路迅速建立，即使在室内，智能手机也能在短短几秒钟内定位我们。

我们将Magic4 Pro与 Garmin Venu 2在我们的小型测试跑道上进行比较。记录的距离只有20米（约65.6英尺），总距离不到10公里（约6.21英里）。仔细看一下详细的路线，证明了Honor 智能手机的精确地理定位能力。

电话和通话质量

Magic4 Pro支持常见的电话功能，如VoLTE、VoWi-Fi，甚至支持eSIM，而不是次要的物理nano SIM卡。然而，Honor 操作系统不包括SIP账户管理。

当举起耳朵时，通话质量听起来非常自然，不值得批评；即使是轻微的环境或静态背景噪音也被可靠地过滤掉。不幸的是，当使用免提电话时，这种情况就改变了。尽管音量保持一致，而且麦克风捕捉声音的范围也很好，但用户听起来有些空洞和沉闷。

摄像机--多功能的三摄像头，有轻微的视频卡顿问题

Honor Magic4Pro的正面有一个1200万像素的前置摄像头和一个3D ToF，位于显示屏的一个切口内。在良好的照明条件下，照片看起来相当不错，而自动HDR模式可以平衡逆光拍摄。此外，这款智能手机还配备了虚化模式和高度可定制的美容模式。视频记录可以以高达超高清和30FPS的速度创建。

背面的三摄像头的主要传感器是一个50MP的传感器。虽然Honor 没有详细说明其来源，但数据表指出是索尼IMX766传感器。白天的照片闪耀着良好的对比度和许多细节。同样，Magic4 Pro的动态范围也使其拍摄的照片很吸引人。虽然颜色被提亮了很多，但它们看起来并没有过度饱和。我们对这款Honor 智能手机的整体图像构图非常满意。也就是说，低光照情况下会导致明显的浑浊区域。在这里，Honor ，可能最好减少增亮，以利于捕捉更多细节。

虽然超宽传感器也有5000万像素的分辨率，但它比主传感器小。在日光下，它能捕捉到具有足够景深和没有色差的吸引人的照片。潜望镜光学系统提供3.5倍光学变焦，以及高达100倍的数字变焦。图片在大约10倍变焦之前仍然可以接受，更高的变焦水平在清晰度和细节方面放弃了太多。

视频录制也是Honor Magic4 Pro的主要焦点之一。普通视频模式支持高达30或60 FPS的超高清分辨率，长宽比为16：9或21：9。切换到电影模式，用户可以在30和24 FPS（UHD）、可选的HDR10+模式和LOG模式（60 FPS）之间选择。LOG模式提供了一个特别高的比特率（Rec.709格式，10比特，IMAX增强型），并承诺了更多的后期处理灵活性。尽管我们对视频的视觉效果很满意，但平移仍会导致轻微的卡顿--我们希望Honor ，在未来的更新中解决这个问题。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera Main camera Ultra wide-angle 5x Zoom Low-Light

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

在受控的照明条件下，测试图表图片中心的细节水平并不理想。至少，在接近边缘的地方，性能并没有明显下降。

ColorChecker显示，深绿色和深色皮肤的色调被过度提亮。同时，青色略微过饱和。

配件和保修 - 包括100瓦的充电器

Honor Magic4 Pro的包装包括一个强大的100瓦充电器，一条合适的USB线（Type-A到Type-C），一个SIM卡工具，以及一个透明的硅胶套。一个无线100瓦充电站约100美元和一个黑色PU壳约20美元的黑色PU保护套也可提供。

Honor 根据购买地点的不同，提供长达2年的有限保修。

输入设备和处理 - 带有安全生物识别技术的Magic4 Pro

Honor Magic4 Pro有一个电容式触摸屏，能够同时检测多达十个输入。它配备了一个工厂安装的屏幕保护膜，具有良好的滑行性能。虽然边缘的过渡有些粗糙，但这可以通过使用附带的保险杠轻松补救。

以前型号的指关节手势再次可用，还有一些额外的功能，如多窗口和智能感应，可以从设置中启用。单手模式也可以启用，尽管它可能需要一些与手势控制相结合的练习。

生物识别安全功能是高科技。这是少数具有3D面部识别（ToF）的Android 智能手机之一。与通过前置摄像头进行的二维认证相比，这种认证不仅快速，而且更安全。同样，显示屏下的指纹传感器是一个超声波模型，它通过保存的指纹快速而可靠地解锁手机。总共可以保存五个指纹。

▶ load Youtube video

显示屏 -Honor 智能手机，采用明亮的LTPO OLED和120赫兹。

Honor Magic4 Pro配备了6.81英寸LTPO OLED面板，提供高像素密度和独特的分辨率，介于全高清和QHD+之间。该系统能够在1至120赫兹之间自动调整刷新率，或者用户可以选择一个固定的60、90或120赫兹的刷新率。支持HLG、HDR10和HDR10+，用于显示HDR内容。

启用环境光传感器后，纯白图像的亮度达到956尼特。OLED面板在APL测量中产生类似的结果。当手动控制亮度时，可以达到573尼特。不幸的是，最低亮度有些高。

虽然Magic4 Pro像所有其他OLED一样存在屏幕闪烁的问题，但Honor 承诺提供频率为1920赫兹的直流调光模式，以明显减少眼疲劳。在我们的测量中，这表现为一个稳定的周期，其频率与刷新率一致。


941 cd/m²	955 cd/m²	989 cd/m²
939 cd/m²	956 cd/m²	988 cd/m²
925 cd/m²	955 cd/m²	983 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 989 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 959 cd/m² Minimum: 4.74 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 956 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 3.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
94.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.26

	Honor Magic4 Pro OLED, 2848x1312, 6.8"	Xiaomi 12 Pro AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.7"	OnePlus 10 Pro AMOLED, 3216x1440, 6.7"	Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Dynamic AMOLED, 3088x1440, 6.8"	Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max OLED, 2778x1284, 6.7"	Google Pixel 6 Pro LTPO-OLED, 3120x1440, 6.7"	Oppo Find X5 Pro AMOLED, 3216x1440, 6.7"
Screen		23%	26%	34%	39%	24%	24%
Brightness middle	956	959 0%	793 -17%	1077 13%	1049 10%	794 -17%	746 -22%
Brightness	959	977 2%	776 -19%	1093 14%	1060 11%	801 -16%	744 -22%
Brightness Distribution	94	96 2%	95 1%	97 3%	98 4%	97 3%	97 3%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.4	1.1 54%	0.79 67%	1.2 50%	0.78 67%	0.9 62%	0.9 62%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	5.2	3.1 40%	1.93 63%	2 62%	1.72 67%	2.2 58%	1.6 69%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.3	1.9 42%	1.3 61%	1.3 61%	0.8 76%	1.5 55%	1.6 52%
Gamma	2.26 ^97%	2.22 ^99%	2.223 ^99%	2.37 ^93%	2.181 ^101%	2.23 ^99%	2.23 ^99%
CCT	6804 ^96%	6498 ^100%	6624 ^98%	6526 ^100%	6559 ^99%	6654 ^98%	6499 ^100%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

119.9 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 119.9 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 119.9 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

在一个固定的变焦水平和各种亮度设置下进行测量

虽然Honor Magic4 Pro的面板可以产生良好的图像，但这需要我们调整设置，将其限制在较小的sRGB色彩空间。奇怪的是，我们不得不选择色温设置冷。默认设置下的色彩平衡比较暖和，并受到绿色色调的影响，这使屏幕内容看起来有些病态。

虽然Honor 智能手机做得很好，但它的色彩准确度还不如同价位的竞争对手。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
1.49 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.629 ms rise
1.49 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.559 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.01 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.484 ms rise
1.01 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.523 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Honor Magic4 Pro在户外表现良好，屏幕内容始终保持清晰可辨。环境光传感器反应灵敏，能迅速调整面板的亮度以适应照明条件。

我们对这款Honor 智能手机的可视角度非常满意。虽然在极端角度下可以观察到微弱的绿色色调，并且感知亮度下降，但这并不明显影响日常使用。

性能 - 配备骁龙8代的Magic4 Pro

Honor Magic4 Pro依赖于一个强大的高通Snapdragon 8 Gen 1芯片，这是继全新的骁龙8+第1代 - 是目前最快的Android SoC。此外，Honor ，该手机获得了8GB的LPDDR5内存，在某些零售商处有12GB的版本。

Magic智能手机带有一个所谓的性能模式，对CPU和系统性能几乎没有影响。Geekbench的结果保持在同一水平，而人工智能和系统性能则上升了几个百分点。对于日常任务来说，伴随而来的耗电量增加并不是一个值得的交易。然而，在禁用性能模式的情况下，基准测试结果与我们的预期有些差距。尽管Geekbench的单核性能保持不变，但全核性能下降了约10%。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144	1742 Points +42%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	1257 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (1181 - 1298, n=21)	1231 Points 0%
Honor Magic4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	1226 Points
OnePlus 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	1211 Points -1%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	1192 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	1154 Points -6%
Google Pixel 6 Pro Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 12288	1057 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone (126 - 2437, n=172, last 2 years)	995 Points -19%
Multi-Core
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144	4914 Points +46%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	3738 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	3560 Points +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (3269 - 3839, n=21)	3548 Points +5%
OnePlus 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	3521 Points +4%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	3488 Points +3%
Honor Magic4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	3377 Points
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 6687, n=172, last 2 years)	3312 Points -2%
Google Pixel 6 Pro Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 12288	2941 Points -13%

Antutu v9 - Total Score
OnePlus 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	1011412 Points +8%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	962824 Points +2%
Honor Magic4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	940036 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (692924 - 1041980, n=18)	928953 Points -1%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	856953 Points -9%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144	800222 Points -15%
Average of class Smartphone (99654 - 1650926, n=104, last 2 years)	798401 Points -15%
Google Pixel 6 Pro Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 12288	720905 Points -23%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	704479 Points -25%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Honor Magic4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	14283 Points
OnePlus 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	13827 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (10140 - 17025, n=21)	13216 Points -7%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	13131 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone (4609 - 24088, n=190, last 2 years)	12976 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	12579 Points -12%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	12144 Points -15%
Google Pixel 6 Pro Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 12288	11605 Points -19%

CrossMark - Overall
OnePlus 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	1169 Points +8%
Honor Magic4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	1079 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (749 - 1169, n=14)	993 Points -8%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	956 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	942 Points -13%
Google Pixel 6 Pro Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 12288	906 Points -16%
Average of class Smartphone (187 - 1517, n=157, last 2 years)	884 Points -18%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	811 Points -25%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144	8124 Points +7%
Honor Magic4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	7567 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (6007 - 7665, n=15)	6951 Points -8%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	6799 Points -10%
OnePlus 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	6584 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	6319 Points -16%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11976, n=151, last 2 years)	6297 Points -17%
Google Pixel 6 Pro Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 12288	6053 Points -20%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	6007 Points -21%
System
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144	19657 Points +79%
Honor Magic4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	10990 Points
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	10464 Points -5%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	10340 Points -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (9273 - 11338, n=15)	10312 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=151, last 2 years)	10163 Points -8%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	10006 Points -9%
OnePlus 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	9934 Points -10%
Google Pixel 6 Pro Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 12288	9009 Points -18%
Memory
Honor Magic4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	7806 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (5125 - 8906, n=15)	6787 Points -13%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=151, last 2 years)	6767 Points -13%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	6523 Points -16%
Google Pixel 6 Pro Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 12288	6336 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	6212 Points -20%
OnePlus 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	5437 Points -30%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	5125 Points -34%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144	3612 Points -54%
Graphics
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144	25642 Points +18%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	21944 Points +1%
Honor Magic4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	21737 Points
OnePlus 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	21678 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (15216 - 22308, n=15)	20338 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	17104 Points -21%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=151, last 2 years)	16908 Points -22%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	15216 Points -30%
Google Pixel 6 Pro Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 12288	13319 Points -39%
Web
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144	2392 Points +36%
Google Pixel 6 Pro Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 12288	1765 Points 0%
Honor Magic4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	1758 Points
Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	1669 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (1291 - 1888, n=15)	1659 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2145, n=151, last 2 years)	1564 Points -11%
OnePlus 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	1527 Points -13%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	1444 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	1434 Points -18%

AImark - Score v2.x
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144	107460 Points +1528%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	72572 Points +999%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (1046 - 96317, n=14)	17097 Points +159%
Honor Magic4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	6602 Points
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	6217 Points -6%
OnePlus 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	6121 Points -7%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	5982 Points -9%
Google Pixel 6 Pro Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 12288	5782 Points -12%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Honor Magic4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	80599 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (61568 - 81722, n=8)	72917 Points -10%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	68880 Points -15%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	63613 Points -21%
Google Pixel 6 Pro Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 12288	27946 Points -65%
Average of class Smartphone (1267 - 74958, n=143, last 2 years)	16841 Points -79%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	10841 Points -87%

Magic4 Pro的 Adreno 730提供了大量的图形性能，基准测试结果大多符合我们对这个图形芯片的期望。然而，正如GFXBench的屏幕外结果所显示的那样，经常有未开发的潜力，表明该SoC的冷却解决方案不具备支持持续高性能水平的条件。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	2817 Points +9%
Honor Magic4 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2585 Points
OnePlus 10 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2568 Points -1%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2523 Points -2%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2513 Points -3%
Google Pixel 6 Pro Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1998 Points -23%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1916 Points -26%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	3080 Points +17%
Honor Magic4 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2639 Points
OnePlus 10 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2637 Points 0%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2609 Points -1%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2575 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2044 Points -23%
Google Pixel 6 Pro Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1973 Points -25%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	11688 Points +13%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	10384 Points +1%
Honor Magic4 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	10317 Points
OnePlus 10 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	10282 Points 0%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	10175 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7288 Points -29%
Google Pixel 6 Pro Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7057 Points -32%

3DMark / Wild Life Score
OnePlus 10 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	10034 Points
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9927 Points
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9826 Points
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	9680 Points
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7236 Points
Google Pixel 6 Pro Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6516 Points
Honor Magic4 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4150 Points +9%
OnePlus 10 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3998 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3957 Points +4%
Google Pixel 6 Pro Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3919 Points +3%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3902 Points +3%
Honor Magic4 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3801 Points
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	1902 Points -50%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
OnePlus 10 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	19283 Points +4%
Honor Magic4 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	18581 Points
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	18090 Points -3%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	16202 Points -13%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	13950 Points -25%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	12972 Points -30%
Google Pixel 6 Pro Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	10733 Points -42%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
OnePlus 10 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	10323 Points +4%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	10005 Points 0%
Honor Magic4 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9968 Points
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9149 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8612 Points -14%
Google Pixel 6 Pro Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7742 Points -22%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	5782 Points -42%

3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	12123 Points +5%
Honor Magic4 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	11556 Points
OnePlus 10 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	11411 Points -1%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	10958 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	10415 Points -10%
Google Pixel 6 Pro Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9654 Points -16%

3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Honor Magic4 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	25324 Points
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	25285 Points 0%
OnePlus 10 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	25242 Points 0%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	20842 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	18689 Points -26%
Google Pixel 6 Pro Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	15556 Points -39%

3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4296 Points +8%
Google Pixel 6 Pro Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4147 Points +4%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4120 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4085 Points +3%
Honor Magic4 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3981 Points
OnePlus 10 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3922 Points -1%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	121 fps +2%
Honor Magic4 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	119 fps
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	118 fps -1%
Google Pixel 6 Pro Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	101 fps -15%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	60 fps -50%
OnePlus 10 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps -50%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps -50%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Honor Magic4 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	439 fps
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	425 fps -3%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	409.6 fps -7%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	380 fps -13%
OnePlus 10 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	368 fps -16%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	302 fps -31%
Google Pixel 6 Pro Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	125 fps -72%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	117 fps +2%
Honor Magic4 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	115 fps
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	108 fps -6%
Google Pixel 6 Pro Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	65 fps -43%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	60 fps -48%
OnePlus 10 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps -48%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps -48%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	251 fps +38%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	227.9 fps +25%
OnePlus 10 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	204 fps +12%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	187 fps +3%
Honor Magic4 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	182 fps
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	181 fps -1%
Google Pixel 6 Pro Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	89 fps -51%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Honor Magic4 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	101 fps
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	87 fps -14%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	71 fps -30%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	60 fps -41%
OnePlus 10 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps -41%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	56 fps -45%
Google Pixel 6 Pro Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	42 fps -58%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	169 fps +12%
Honor Magic4 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	151 fps
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	144 fps -5%
OnePlus 10 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	131 fps -13%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	127 fps -16%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	111 fps -26%
Google Pixel 6 Pro Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	65 fps -57%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
OnePlus 10 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps +3%
Honor Magic4 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	58 fps
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	53.2 fps -8%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	39 fps -33%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	39 fps -33%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	36 fps -38%
Google Pixel 6 Pro Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	30 fps -48%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Honor Magic4 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	97 fps
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	92.9 fps -4%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	71 fps -27%
OnePlus 10 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	71 fps -27%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	68 fps -30%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	63 fps -35%
Google Pixel 6 Pro Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	48 fps -51%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
OnePlus 10 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	57 fps +27%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	54.8 fps +22%
Honor Magic4 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	45 fps
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	36 fps -20%
Google Pixel 6 Pro Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	32 fps -29%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	31 fps -31%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	27 fps -40%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Honor Magic4 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	46 fps
OnePlus 10 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	43 fps -7%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	40 fps -13%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	37.9 fps -18%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	34 fps -26%
Google Pixel 6 Pro Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	30 fps -35%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	30 fps -35%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Honor Magic4 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	67 fps
OnePlus 10 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps -10%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	59.1 fps -12%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	53 fps -21%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	44 fps -34%
Google Pixel 6 Pro Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	43 fps -36%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	42 fps -37%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Honor Magic4 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	113 fps
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	108 fps -4%
OnePlus 10 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	101 fps -11%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	94 fps -17%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	92 fps -19%
Google Pixel 6 Pro Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	69 fps -39%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	68 fps -40%

虽然与我们比较中的其他设备相比，网络浏览性能是最低的，但主观体验仍然很好。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (Safari 15)	181.8 Points +135%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=161, last 2 years)	120.4 Points +56%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (72.8 - 134.6, n=16)	107.9 Points +40%
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99)	103 Points +33%
OnePlus 10 Pro (Chrome100)	101.23 Points +31%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99)	96.8 Points +25%
Google Pixel 6 Pro (Chrome 100)	91.7 Points +19%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)	84.1 Points +9%
Honor Magic4 Pro (Chrome 102)	77.337 Points

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (Safari 15)	242 runs/min +269%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years)	136.2 runs/min +108%
OnePlus 10 Pro (Chrome100)	129.3 runs/min +97%
Google Pixel 6 Pro (Chrome 100)	111 runs/min +69%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99)	108 runs/min +65%
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99)	104 runs/min +59%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (64.4 - 129.3, n=16)	104 runs/min +59%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)	73.5 runs/min +12%
Honor Magic4 Pro (Chrome 102)	65.5 runs/min

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (Safari 15)	248 Points +146%
OnePlus 10 Pro (Chrome100)	193 Points +91%
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)	148.7 Points +47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (79 - 193, n=15)	142.9 Points +41%
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99)	133 Points +32%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99)	124 Points +23%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)	119 Points +18%
Google Pixel 6 Pro (Chrome 100)	105 Points +4%
Honor Magic4 Pro (Chrome 102)	101 Points

Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (Safari 15)	63831 Points +130%
OnePlus 10 Pro (Chrome100)	49343 Points +78%
Google Pixel 6 Pro (Chrome 100)	44034 Points +59%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (27730 - 50626, n=17)	42391 Points +53%
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99)	38407 Points +39%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years)	37161 Points +34%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99)	34055 Points +23%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)	29750 Points +7%
Honor Magic4 Pro (Chrome 102)	27730 Points

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years)	1568 ms * -9%
Honor Magic4 Pro (Chrome 102)	1440.1 ms *
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)	1330 ms * +8%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99)	1259 ms * +13%
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99)	1125 ms * +22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (814 - 1440, n=16)	1010 ms * +30%
Google Pixel 6 Pro (Chrome 100)	915 ms * +36%
OnePlus 10 Pro (Chrome100)	823.5 ms * +43%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (Safari 15)	414.8 ms * +71%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=152, last 2 years)	113.8 Points +60%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (68 - 119, n=4)	93 Points +31%
Honor Magic4 Pro (Chrome 102)	71 Points

* ... smaller is better

8GB的内存和256GB的内部UFS 3.1存储，Magic4 Pro的内存配置还算不错。然而，从价格上看，至少内存容量可以更高。在中国，还有两种内存配置。12/256 GB和12/512 GB。

我们对所安装内存的速度没有任何抱怨，它可以实现快速的数据传输。

	Honor Magic4 Pro	Xiaomi 12 Pro	OnePlus 10 Pro	Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G	Google Pixel 6 Pro	Oppo Find X5 Pro	Average 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		10%	-11%	-10%	-51%	-34%	-7%	-3%
Sequential Read 256KB	1868.5	1620 -13%	1602.12 -14%	1653 -12%	1560 -17%	1410 -25%	1749 ?(950 - 2037, n=101) -6%	1839 ?(226 - 4512, n=192, last 2 years) -2%
Sequential Write 256KB	1367.48	1465 7%	1253.34 -8%	1074 -21%	242.5 -82%	894 -35%	1163 ?(452 - 2004, n=101) -15%	1425 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=192, last 2 years) 4%
Random Read 4KB	268.76	324.9 21%	284.34 6%	322.3 20%	129.4 -52%	183.7 -32%	286 ?(173.5 - 543, n=101) 6%	277 ?(22.2 - 483, n=192, last 2 years) 3%
Random Write 4KB	366.13	448.9 23%	264.45 -28%	273.1 -25%	178.5 -51%	210.4 -43%	319 ?(132.1 - 499, n=102) -13%	309 ?(9.4 - 753, n=192, last 2 years) -16%

游戏 -Honor 具有大量游戏能力的智能手机

虽然我们想在这里展示我们的GameBench游戏基准，但帧率并没有被记录下来，即使Gamebench似乎开始记录FPS。我们无法确定原因，并就这一问题与GameBench联系，希望将来能附加上结果。

Adreno 730提供了快速的游戏性能，并以最大的细节顺利地运行所有的游戏。PUBG移动版允许选择超高清设置，不会出现卡顿现象。要求不高的游戏，如Armajet，允许不设上限的帧率。因此，120 FPS在理论上是可能的，但根据我们的经验，不太可能。然而，类似的帧率在其他HFR游戏中肯定是可以实现的。

No graph data

排放 - 体面的立体声扬声器

温度

Honor Magic4 Pro 5G的表面温度在所有情况下都保持在较低的水平，便于操作。

SoC温度的情况则相反。在这里，Honor 智能手机的节流相当早，但仍然设法在相同的范围内，作为其骁龙8代1竞争对手的范围内，而小米12 Pro则在长期性能方面小米12 Pro是唯一的例外，因为它的节流现象比较严重。

Max. Load

Idle


34.4 °C	34.7 °C	34.4 °C
33.8 °C	34.4 °C	34.4 °C
32.5 °C	34.3 °C	33.1 °C

Maximum: 34.7 °C
Average: 34 °C


31.6 °C	32.4 °C	32.8 °C
31.7 °C	32.9 °C	33 °C
31.7 °C	33.2 °C	32.7 °C

Maximum: 33.2 °C
Average: 32.4 °C

Power Supply (max.) 28.8 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.7 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.2 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.7 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	80.1 (44.5^min) % +23%
OnePlus 10 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	69.3 (41.6^min) % +6%
Honor Magic4 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	65.3 (38.3^min) %
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	62.7 (37.2^min) % -4%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	58.5 (25.9^min) % -10%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	47.2 (27.4^min) % -28%
Google Pixel 6 Pro Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	43.4 (17.4^min) % -34%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	77 (12.3^min) % +23%
OnePlus 10 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	73.1 (11.3^min) % +17%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	62.7 (9.64^min) % 0%
Honor Magic4 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	62.6 (9.89^min) %
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	61.8 (7.76^min) % -1%
Google Pixel 6 Pro Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	44 (5.37^min) % -30%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	% -100%

Honor Magic4 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø11.1 (9.89-15.8)

Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.8.1: Ø10.9 (9.64-15.4)

Honor Magic4 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø39.7 (38.3-58.6)

Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø41.7 (37.2-59.4)

Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø43.7 (38.1-60.9)

发言人

Honor Magic4 Pro的两个扬声器提供了相当体面的声音，虽然缺乏低音，但听起来相当悦耳，特别是在中等音量水平。在较高的音量下，高音变得有些压抑，整体声音有些空洞。

由于没有耳机插孔，有线耳机和耳麦只能通过USB连接。当然，也可以用一个适配器来代替。Magic4 Pro为无线音频做了充分准备，支持所有主要的音频编解码器（SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD和LDAC）。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Honor Magic4 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.2% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 28% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 在高达100瓦的情况下快速充电

能源消耗

Magic4 Pro在最大亮度下的耗电量在空闲时略显过高。有了LTPO面板，这款智能手机的能源效率应该明显提高。同样，在我们的GFXBench测试中，Honor ，手机在较低的亮度设置下会消耗大量的电力。

使用附带的100瓦SuperCharge充电器，Magic4 Pro可以在20分钟内完全充电。还支持高达100瓦的无线充电。此外，Magic4 Pro还可以通过反向充电为其他具备Qi功能的设备充电。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.08 / 0.09 Watt
Idle	0.87 / 2.04 / 2.26 Watt
Load	4.97 / 7.46 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Honor Magic4 Pro 4600 mAh	Xiaomi 12 Pro 4600 mAh	OnePlus 10 Pro 5000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G 5000 mAh	Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max 4352 mAh	Google Pixel 6 Pro 5003 mAh	Oppo Find X5 Pro 5000 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		10%	2%	11%	30%	11%	12%	-14%	-1%
Idle Minimum *	0.87	0.94 -8%	0.7 20%	0.58 33%	0.6 31%	0.7 20%	1.24 -43%	1.255 ?(0.7 - 3.18, n=15) -44%	0.894 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=152, last 2 years) -3%
Idle Average *	2.04	1.24 39%	1.1 46%	0.71 65%	1.5 26%	1 51%	1.39 32%	2.02 ?(1.04 - 4.38, n=15) 1%	1.456 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=152, last 2 years) 29%
Idle Maximum *	2.26	1.34 41%	1.7 25%	1.16 49%	1.6 29%	1.04 54%	1.42 37%	2.21 ?(1.15 - 4.45, n=15) 2%	1.616 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=152, last 2 years) 28%
Load Average *	4.97	5.7 -15%	6.4 -29%	7.07 -42%	3.5 30%	6.87 -38%	3.58 28%	5.49 ?(3.58 - 8.04, n=15) -10%	6.45 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=147, last 2 years) -30%
Load Maximum *	7.46	8.12 -9%	11.3 -51%	11.32 -52%	4.8 36%	9.87 -32%	6.99 6%	8.75 ?(6.67 - 11.3, n=15) -17%	9.8 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=147, last 2 years) -31%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 nits)

Honor Magic4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1: Ø5.84 (0.1246-10.8)

Oppo Find X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1: Ø5.27 (0.963-10.9)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 nits)

Honor Magic4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø10.6 (0.511-12.8)

Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø7.78 (6.94-8.13)

Honor Magic4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.397 (1.254-1.8)

Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.977 (0.881-1.647)

电池寿命

Honor Magic4 Pro使用4600毫安时的电池，导致整体运行时间相当长。然而，我们的真实世界Wi-Fi测试（150尼特）似乎对智能手机的负担特别大，在这种情况下，它没有像大多数竞争对手那样持续很长时间，而是落在了与 Pixel 6 Pro.也就是说，电池寿命仍然很好，足以应付一整天的使用。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		22h 26min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 102)		11h 27min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		16h 35min
Load (maximum brightness)		6h 29min

	Honor Magic4 Pro 4600 mAh	Xiaomi 12 Pro 4600 mAh	OnePlus 10 Pro 5000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G 5000 mAh	Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max 4352 mAh	Google Pixel 6 Pro 5003 mAh	Oppo Find X5 Pro 5000 mAh
Battery Runtime		7%	3%	21%	59%	-3%	5%
Reader / Idle	1346	2036 51%	1617 20%	1973 47%	2846 111%		1269 -6%
H.264	995	788 -21%	1121 13%	1078 8%	1522 53%		1142 15%
WiFi v1.3	687	766 11%	767 12%	844 23%	1067 55%	667 -3%	788 15%
Load	389	337 -13%	255 -34%	410 5%	452 16%		367 -6%

Pros

+ 明亮的120-Hz OLED显示屏

+ 极速充电

+ 带有VHT160的Wi-Fi 6

+ 非常精确的地理定位

+ IP68认证

+ 超声波指纹传感器和3D面部识别

Cons

- 没有Wi-Fi 6E

- 没有可选的存储扩展

- 尽管有LTPO，但有时会出现高消耗

结论 -Honor ，强势复出

通过Magic4 Pro，Honor ，试图通过向我们展示一款装备精良的高端智能手机来重温并不遥远的光辉岁月，它不需要躲避其竞争对手。

主要焦点在于相机设置，在我们的测试中产生了良好的效果，在视频拍摄能力方面似乎也取得了很大的进步。也就是说，在写这篇文章时，录制视频仍然不是一个完全流畅的体验。然而，我们相信视频卡顿的问题将在下一次更新中得到解决。

Honor Magic4 Pro是一款高端智能手机，具有良好的功能，能够以良好的相机、IP68认证、极快的充电速度和吸引人的设计而大放异彩。

凭借其明亮的LTPO显示屏、快速的Wi-Fi、IP68认证、快速的有线和无线充电、带桌面模式的USB 3.2以及快速的处理器，Honor 设备几乎没有留下任何不足之处。在Wi-Fi连接方面有一些小缺点，它不包括6GHz的频率。此外，显示屏的峰值亮度还可以再高一点。

如果你需要一个具有更大亮度的显示屏，可以选择 Galaxy S22 Ultra可能值得关注，因为它还具有更长的保证更新期。这款像素6 Pro是另一个潜在的选择，它有一个好的摄像头和一个低价格。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和可用性

对于非美国的客户，Honor Magic4 Pro在Honor "自己的商店 "上的售价约为1100欧元（建议零售价）。并经常附带一些额外的产品，如外壳、智能手表或充电站。另外，这款智能手机还可以在非美国的在线零售商，如Amazon.co.uk和进口商店，如Tradingshenzhen分别售价约800英镑和975美元。

Honor Magic4 Pro - 08/30/2022 v7 ^(old)
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis

88%

Keyboard

67 / 75 → 89%

Pointing Device

93%

Connectivity

69 / 70 → 98%

Weight

88%

Battery

90%

Display

91%

Games Performance

66 / 64 → 100%

Application Performance

88 / 86 → 100%

Temperature

93%

Noise

100%

Audio

73 / 90 → 81%

Camera

78%

Average

83%

89%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Marius Schell - Tech Writer and translator - 398 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2020

contact me via: LinkedIn

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 460014 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > Honor Magic4 Pro 5G评测--功能多样的摄像智能手机，功能丰富

Daniel Schmidt, 2022-07-14 (Update: 2024-08-15)

潜在的竞争对手比较

外壳 - 大量的玻璃，与Mate系列相似

尺寸比较

连接性 -Honor 带有USB 3.2和红外辐射器的智能手机

软件 - 谷歌Android 12，包括桌面模式

通信和GNSS - Magic4 Pro，带5G和Wi-Fi 6

电话和通话质量

摄像机--多功能的三摄像头，有轻微的视频卡顿问题

配件和保修 - 包括100瓦的充电器

输入设备和处理 - 带有安全生物识别技术的Magic4 Pro

显示屏 -Honor 智能手机，采用明亮的LTPO OLED和120赫兹。

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

性能 - 配备骁龙8代的Magic4 Pro

游戏 -Honor 具有大量游戏能力的智能手机

排放 - 体面的立体声扬声器

温度

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

发言人

Honor Magic4 Pro audio analysis

Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G audio analysis

电池寿命 - 在高达100瓦的情况下快速充电

能源消耗

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 nits)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 nits)

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

结论 -Honor ，强势复出

价格和可用性

More articles related to this device

Price comparison