Honor Magic4 Pro 5G评测--功能多样的摄像智能手机,功能丰富
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
88.6 % | 07/2022 | Honor Magic4 Pro SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730 | 215 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.81" | 2848x1312 | |
87.6 % | 02/2022 | Xiaomi 12 Pro SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730 | 204 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.73" | 3200x1440 | |
88.1 % | 06/2022 | OnePlus 10 Pro SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730 | 200.5 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.70" | 3216x1440 | |
89.4 % | 03/2022 | Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920 | 228 g | 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.80" | 3088x1440 | |
90.5 % | 10/2021 | Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max A15, A15 GPU 5-Core | 238 g | 128 GB NVMe | 6.70" | 2778x1284 | |
89.2 % | 04/2022 | Google Pixel 6 Pro Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20 | 210 g | 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.70" | 3120x1440 | |
89.2 % | 04/2022 | Oppo Find X5 Pro SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730 | 221 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.70" | 3216x1440 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳 - 大量的玻璃,与Mate系列相似
Honor Magic4 Pro有黑色和青色两种颜色,另外还有白色、金色和橙色版本,可能会根据地区的不同而不同。我们的测试设备是一个青色型号,根据数据表,其厚度为9.15毫米(约0.36英寸)。我们测量了9.45毫米(约0.37英寸)。由于相机设置占用了很多空间,智能手机在平坦的表面上放置时不会左右摇晃。1.7毫米(约0.07英寸),摄像头的凸起不是太明显。
我们对其做工非常满意。纤细的金属框架使其具有坚固和优质的外观。玻璃显示屏与框架平齐,略微倾斜的玻璃边缘使Honor ,看起来几乎没有框架,93%的屏占比进一步加强了这种印象。虽然间隙紧密而均匀,但Magic4 Pro在从四角扭转时有明显的吱吱声。
框架内有一个凹陷的SIM卡托盘盖,颜色相同,正面是金属。托盘本身由黑色塑料组成,可接受两张纳米SIM卡。电池是固定的,用户不能更换。Honor Magic4 Pro通过了IP68认证,既防水又防尘。
连接性 -Honor 带有USB 3.2和红外辐射器的智能手机
软件 - 谷歌Android 12,包括桌面模式
Android 12是选择的操作系统,上面有制造商自己的Magic UI 6.0层。熟悉过去 智能手机的用户将感到宾至如归。由于谷歌的应用和服务不再缺失,Play商店和谷歌支付都再次可用。Honor
Magic4 Pro上只有几个预装的第三方应用程序,包括Netflix和TikTok,它们可以很容易地被卸载。在写这篇文章时,安全补丁可以追溯到2022年5月1日,因此它们是相当新的。Honor ,承诺进行两次主要的Android 版本更新,因此可以达到Android 14,安全补丁可以使用4年。
如果智能手机通过可选的电缆连接到显示器或电视上,可以使用集成的桌面模式。虽然在我们的测试中工作良好,但我们无法在这种模式下访问Play Store或Chrome。其他浏览器的工作没有任何问题。
通信和GNSS - Magic4 Pro,带5G和Wi-Fi 6
在通信方面,Honor Magic4 Pro有一个小小的缺点,因为不支持最新的Wi-Fi 6E标准,因此不能使用6-GHz。相比之下,Honor 确实支持VHT160,使其与我们的参考路由器华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000之间的传输速度不仅一致,而且即使在5-GHz网络中也非常快。
蜂窝网络的所有主要标准,包括5G sub6都可以使用。由于支持的频率数量很高,用户应该能够从世界上大多数国家访问网络。
Networking | |
Honor Magic4 Pro | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
Xiaomi 12 Pro | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
OnePlus 10 Pro | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 |
|
iperf3 receive AX12 |
|
Google Pixel 6 Pro | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
Oppo Find X5 Pro | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
Average of class Smartphone | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
出于地理定位的目的,Magic4 Pro可以接入广泛的卫星网络,甚至可以实现三重连接。在户外,卫星上行链路迅速建立,即使在室内,智能手机也能在短短几秒钟内定位我们。
我们将Magic4 Pro与 Garmin Venu 2在我们的小型测试跑道上进行比较。记录的距离只有20米(约65.6英尺),总距离不到10公里(约6.21英里)。仔细看一下详细的路线,证明了Honor 智能手机的精确地理定位能力。
电话和通话质量
Magic4 Pro支持常见的电话功能,如VoLTE、VoWi-Fi,甚至支持eSIM,而不是次要的物理nano SIM卡。然而,Honor 操作系统不包括SIP账户管理。
当举起耳朵时,通话质量听起来非常自然,不值得批评;即使是轻微的环境或静态背景噪音也被可靠地过滤掉。不幸的是,当使用免提电话时,这种情况就改变了。尽管音量保持一致,而且麦克风捕捉声音的范围也很好,但用户听起来有些空洞和沉闷。
摄像机--多功能的三摄像头,有轻微的视频卡顿问题
Honor Magic4Pro的正面有一个1200万像素的前置摄像头和一个3D ToF,位于显示屏的一个切口内。在良好的照明条件下,照片看起来相当不错,而自动HDR模式可以平衡逆光拍摄。此外,这款智能手机还配备了虚化模式和高度可定制的美容模式。视频记录可以以高达超高清和30FPS的速度创建。
背面的三摄像头的主要传感器是一个50MP的传感器。虽然Honor 没有详细说明其来源,但数据表指出是索尼IMX766传感器。白天的照片闪耀着良好的对比度和许多细节。同样,Magic4 Pro的动态范围也使其拍摄的照片很吸引人。虽然颜色被提亮了很多,但它们看起来并没有过度饱和。我们对这款Honor 智能手机的整体图像构图非常满意。也就是说,低光照情况下会导致明显的浑浊区域。在这里,Honor ,可能最好减少增亮,以利于捕捉更多细节。
虽然超宽传感器也有5000万像素的分辨率,但它比主传感器小。在日光下,它能捕捉到具有足够景深和没有色差的吸引人的照片。潜望镜光学系统提供3.5倍光学变焦,以及高达100倍的数字变焦。图片在大约10倍变焦之前仍然可以接受,更高的变焦水平在清晰度和细节方面放弃了太多。
视频录制也是Honor Magic4 Pro的主要焦点之一。普通视频模式支持高达30或60 FPS的超高清分辨率,长宽比为16:9或21:9。切换到电影模式,用户可以在30和24 FPS(UHD)、可选的HDR10+模式和LOG模式(60 FPS)之间选择。LOG模式提供了一个特别高的比特率(Rec.709格式,10比特,IMAX增强型),并承诺了更多的后期处理灵活性。尽管我们对视频的视觉效果很满意,但平移仍会导致轻微的卡顿--我们希望Honor ,在未来的更新中解决这个问题。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain cameraUltra wide-angle5x ZoomLow-Light在受控的照明条件下,测试图表图片中心的细节水平并不理想。至少,在接近边缘的地方,性能并没有明显下降。
ColorChecker显示,深绿色和深色皮肤的色调被过度提亮。同时,青色略微过饱和。
![ColorChecker](fileadmin/_processed_/b/9/csm_Foto_Magic4Pro_ColorChecker_6fc7898f6b.jpg)
![ColorChecker](fileadmin/_processed_/7/0/csm_Foto_Magic4Pro_ColorChecker_1Lux_56bfbe809f.jpg)
配件和保修 - 包括100瓦的充电器
输入设备和处理 - 带有安全生物识别技术的Magic4 Pro
Honor Magic4 Pro有一个电容式触摸屏,能够同时检测多达十个输入。它配备了一个工厂安装的屏幕保护膜,具有良好的滑行性能。虽然边缘的过渡有些粗糙,但这可以通过使用附带的保险杠轻松补救。
以前型号的指关节手势再次可用,还有一些额外的功能,如多窗口和智能感应,可以从设置中启用。单手模式也可以启用,尽管它可能需要一些与手势控制相结合的练习。
生物识别安全功能是高科技。这是少数具有3D面部识别(ToF)的Android 智能手机之一。与通过前置摄像头进行的二维认证相比,这种认证不仅快速,而且更安全。同样,显示屏下的指纹传感器是一个超声波模型,它通过保存的指纹快速而可靠地解锁手机。总共可以保存五个指纹。
显示屏 -Honor 智能手机,采用明亮的LTPO OLED和120赫兹。
Honor Magic4 Pro配备了6.81英寸LTPO OLED面板,提供高像素密度和独特的分辨率,介于全高清和QHD+之间。该系统能够在1至120赫兹之间自动调整刷新率,或者用户可以选择一个固定的60、90或120赫兹的刷新率。支持HLG、HDR10和HDR10+,用于显示HDR内容。
启用环境光传感器后,纯白图像的亮度达到956尼特。OLED面板在APL测量中产生类似的结果。当手动控制亮度时,可以达到573尼特。不幸的是,最低亮度有些高。
虽然Magic4 Pro像所有其他OLED一样存在屏幕闪烁的问题,但Honor 承诺提供频率为1920赫兹的直流调光模式,以明显减少眼疲劳。在我们的测量中,这表现为一个稳定的周期,其频率与刷新率一致。
|
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 956 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.95
ΔE Greyscale 3.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
94.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.26
Honor Magic4 Pro OLED, 2848x1312, 6.8" | Xiaomi 12 Pro AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.7" | OnePlus 10 Pro AMOLED, 3216x1440, 6.7" | Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Dynamic AMOLED, 3088x1440, 6.8" | Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max OLED, 2778x1284, 6.7" | Google Pixel 6 Pro LTPO-OLED, 3120x1440, 6.7" | Oppo Find X5 Pro AMOLED, 3216x1440, 6.7" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 23% | 26% | 34% | 39% | 24% | 24% | |
Brightness middle | 956 | 959 0% | 793 -17% | 1077 13% | 1049 10% | 794 -17% | 746 -22% |
Brightness | 959 | 977 2% | 776 -19% | 1093 14% | 1060 11% | 801 -16% | 744 -22% |
Brightness Distribution | 94 | 96 2% | 95 1% | 97 3% | 98 4% | 97 3% | 97 3% |
Black Level * | |||||||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.4 | 1.1 54% | 0.79 67% | 1.2 50% | 0.78 67% | 0.9 62% | 0.9 62% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.2 | 3.1 40% | 1.93 63% | 2 62% | 1.72 67% | 2.2 58% | 1.6 69% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.3 | 1.9 42% | 1.3 61% | 1.3 61% | 0.8 76% | 1.5 55% | 1.6 52% |
Gamma | 2.26 97% | 2.22 99% | 2.223 99% | 2.37 93% | 2.181 101% | 2.23 99% | 2.23 99% |
CCT | 6804 96% | 6498 100% | 6624 98% | 6526 100% | 6559 99% | 6654 98% | 6499 100% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 119.9 Hz | ||
The display backlight flickers at 119.9 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 119.9 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17373 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
在一个固定的变焦水平和各种亮度设置下进行测量
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
1.49 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.629 ms rise | |
↘ 0.559 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.2 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
1.01 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.484 ms rise | |
↘ 0.523 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.2 ms). |
性能 - 配备骁龙8代的Magic4 Pro
Honor Magic4 Pro依赖于一个强大的 高通Snapdragon 8 Gen 1芯片,这是继全新的骁龙8+第1代 - 是目前最快的Android SoC。此外,Honor ,该手机获得了8GB的LPDDR5内存,在某些零售商处有12GB的版本。
Magic智能手机带有一个所谓的性能模式,对CPU和系统性能几乎没有影响。Geekbench的结果保持在同一水平,而人工智能和系统性能则上升了几个百分点。对于日常任务来说,伴随而来的耗电量增加并不是一个值得的交易。然而,在禁用性能模式的情况下,基准测试结果与我们的预期有些差距。尽管Geekbench的单核性能保持不变,但全核性能下降了约10%。
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI | |
Honor Magic4 Pro | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (61568 - 81722, n=8) | |
Oppo Find X5 Pro | |
Xiaomi 12 Pro | |
Google Pixel 6 Pro | |
Average of class Smartphone (1267 - 78964, n=147, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G |
Magic4 Pro的 Adreno 730提供了大量的图形性能,基准测试结果大多符合我们对这个图形芯片的期望。然而,正如GFXBench的屏幕外结果所显示的那样,经常有未开发的潜力,表明该SoC的冷却解决方案不具备支持持续高性能水平的条件。
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | |
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max | |
Honor Magic4 Pro | |
OnePlus 10 Pro | |
Oppo Find X5 Pro | |
Xiaomi 12 Pro | |
Google Pixel 6 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G |
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme | |
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max | |
Honor Magic4 Pro | |
OnePlus 10 Pro | |
Xiaomi 12 Pro | |
Oppo Find X5 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G | |
Google Pixel 6 Pro |
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score | |
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max | |
Xiaomi 12 Pro | |
Honor Magic4 Pro | |
OnePlus 10 Pro | |
Oppo Find X5 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G | |
Google Pixel 6 Pro |
3DMark / Wild Life Score | |
OnePlus 10 Pro | |
Xiaomi 12 Pro | |
Oppo Find X5 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G | |
Google Pixel 6 Pro | |
Honor Magic4 Pro |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | |
Xiaomi 12 Pro | |
OnePlus 10 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G | |
Google Pixel 6 Pro | |
Oppo Find X5 Pro | |
Honor Magic4 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | |
OnePlus 10 Pro | |
Honor Magic4 Pro | |
Oppo Find X5 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max | |
Xiaomi 12 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G | |
Google Pixel 6 Pro |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | |
OnePlus 10 Pro | |
Oppo Find X5 Pro | |
Honor Magic4 Pro | |
Xiaomi 12 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G | |
Google Pixel 6 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max |
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited | |
Oppo Find X5 Pro | |
Honor Magic4 Pro | |
OnePlus 10 Pro | |
Xiaomi 12 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G | |
Google Pixel 6 Pro |
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics | |
Honor Magic4 Pro | |
Oppo Find X5 Pro | |
OnePlus 10 Pro | |
Xiaomi 12 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G | |
Google Pixel 6 Pro |
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics | |
Oppo Find X5 Pro | |
Google Pixel 6 Pro | |
Xiaomi 12 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G | |
Honor Magic4 Pro | |
OnePlus 10 Pro |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen | |
Xiaomi 12 Pro | |
Honor Magic4 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G | |
Google Pixel 6 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max | |
OnePlus 10 Pro | |
Oppo Find X5 Pro |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen | |
Honor Magic4 Pro | |
Xiaomi 12 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max | |
Oppo Find X5 Pro | |
OnePlus 10 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G | |
Google Pixel 6 Pro |
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
Xiaomi 12 Pro | |
Honor Magic4 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G | |
Google Pixel 6 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max | |
OnePlus 10 Pro | |
Oppo Find X5 Pro |
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
Xiaomi 12 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max | |
OnePlus 10 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G | |
Honor Magic4 Pro | |
Oppo Find X5 Pro | |
Google Pixel 6 Pro |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
Honor Magic4 Pro | |
Xiaomi 12 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G | |
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max | |
OnePlus 10 Pro | |
Oppo Find X5 Pro | |
Google Pixel 6 Pro |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
Xiaomi 12 Pro | |
Honor Magic4 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max | |
OnePlus 10 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G | |
Oppo Find X5 Pro | |
Google Pixel 6 Pro |
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen | |
OnePlus 10 Pro | |
Honor Magic4 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G | |
Oppo Find X5 Pro | |
Xiaomi 12 Pro | |
Google Pixel 6 Pro |
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen | |
Honor Magic4 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max | |
Xiaomi 12 Pro | |
OnePlus 10 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G | |
Oppo Find X5 Pro | |
Google Pixel 6 Pro |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
OnePlus 10 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max | |
Honor Magic4 Pro | |
Oppo Find X5 Pro | |
Google Pixel 6 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G | |
Xiaomi 12 Pro |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Honor Magic4 Pro | |
OnePlus 10 Pro | |
Oppo Find X5 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max | |
Xiaomi 12 Pro | |
Google Pixel 6 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
Honor Magic4 Pro | |
OnePlus 10 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max | |
Oppo Find X5 Pro | |
Xiaomi 12 Pro | |
Google Pixel 6 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
Honor Magic4 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max | |
OnePlus 10 Pro | |
Oppo Find X5 Pro | |
Xiaomi 12 Pro | |
Google Pixel 6 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G |
虽然与我们比较中的其他设备相比,网络浏览性能是最低的,但主观体验仍然很好。
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (Safari 15) | |
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=164, last 2 years) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (72.8 - 134.6, n=16) | |
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99) | |
OnePlus 10 Pro (Chrome100) | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99) | |
Google Pixel 6 Pro (Chrome 100) | |
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97) | |
Honor Magic4 Pro (Chrome 102) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (Safari 15) | |
OnePlus 10 Pro (Chrome100) | |
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 445, n=150, last 2 years) | |
Google Pixel 6 Pro (Chrome 100) | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99) | |
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (64.4 - 129.3, n=16) | |
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97) | |
Honor Magic4 Pro (Chrome 102) |
WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (Safari 15) | |
OnePlus 10 Pro (Chrome100) | |
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 304, n=94, last 2 years) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (79 - 193, n=15) | |
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99) | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99) | |
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97) | |
Google Pixel 6 Pro (Chrome 100) | |
Honor Magic4 Pro (Chrome 102) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (Safari 15) | |
OnePlus 10 Pro (Chrome100) | |
Google Pixel 6 Pro (Chrome 100) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (27730 - 50626, n=17) | |
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99) | |
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 89112, n=207, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99) | |
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97) | |
Honor Magic4 Pro (Chrome 102) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 28190, n=163, last 2 years) | |
Honor Magic4 Pro (Chrome 102) | |
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97) | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99) | |
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (814 - 1440, n=16) | |
Google Pixel 6 Pro (Chrome 100) | |
OnePlus 10 Pro (Chrome100) | |
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (Safari 15) |
WebXPRT 4 - Overall | |
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 212, n=155, last 2 years) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (68 - 119, n=4) | |
Honor Magic4 Pro (Chrome 102) |
* ... smaller is better
8GB的内存和256GB的内部UFS 3.1存储,Magic4 Pro的内存配置还算不错。然而,从价格上看,至少内存容量可以更高。在中国,还有两种内存配置。12/256 GB和12/512 GB。
我们对所安装内存的速度没有任何抱怨,它可以实现快速的数据传输。
Honor Magic4 Pro | Xiaomi 12 Pro | OnePlus 10 Pro | Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G | Google Pixel 6 Pro | Oppo Find X5 Pro | Average 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | 10% | -11% | -10% | -51% | -34% | -8% | -8% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 1868.5 | 1620 -13% | 1602.12 -14% | 1653 -12% | 1560 -17% | 1410 -25% | 1764 ? -6% | 1717 ? -8% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 1367.48 | 1465 7% | 1253.34 -8% | 1074 -21% | 242.5 -82% | 894 -35% | 1154 ? -16% | 1322 ? -3% |
Random Read 4KB | 268.76 | 324.9 21% | 284.34 6% | 322.3 20% | 129.4 -52% | 183.7 -32% | 285 ? 6% | 265 ? -1% |
Random Write 4KB | 366.13 | 448.9 23% | 264.45 -28% | 273.1 -25% | 178.5 -51% | 210.4 -43% | 316 ? -14% | 292 ? -20% |
游戏 -Honor 具有大量游戏能力的智能手机
虽然我们想在这里展示我们的GameBench游戏基准,但帧率并没有被记录下来,即使Gamebench似乎开始记录FPS。我们无法确定原因,并就这一问题与GameBench联系,希望将来能附加上结果。
Adreno 730提供了快速的游戏性能,并以最大的细节顺利地运行所有的游戏。PUBG移动版允许选择超高清设置,不会出现卡顿现象。要求不高的游戏,如Armajet,允许不设上限的帧率。因此,120 FPS在理论上是可能的,但根据我们的经验,不太可能。然而,类似的帧率在其他HFR游戏中肯定是可以实现的。
排放 - 体面的立体声扬声器
温度
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.7 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.2 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.7 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
3DMark Wild Life Stress Test
3DMark | |
Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max | |
OnePlus 10 Pro | |
Honor Magic4 Pro | |
Oppo Find X5 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G | |
Xiaomi 12 Pro | |
Google Pixel 6 Pro | |
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max | |
OnePlus 10 Pro | |
Oppo Find X5 Pro | |
Honor Magic4 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G | |
Google Pixel 6 Pro | |
Xiaomi 12 Pro |
发言人
Honor Magic4 Pro的两个扬声器提供了相当体面的声音,虽然缺乏低音,但听起来相当悦耳,特别是在中等音量水平。在较高的音量下,高音变得有些压抑,整体声音有些空洞。
由于没有耳机插孔,有线耳机和耳麦只能通过USB连接。当然,也可以用一个适配器来代替。Magic4 Pro为无线音频做了充分准备,支持所有主要的音频编解码器(SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD和LDAC)。
Honor Magic4 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.2% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电池寿命 - 在高达100瓦的情况下快速充电
能源消耗
Magic4 Pro在最大亮度下的耗电量在空闲时略显过高。有了LTPO面板,这款智能手机的能源效率应该明显提高。同样,在我们的GFXBench测试中,Honor ,手机在较低的亮度设置下会消耗大量的电力。
使用附带的100瓦SuperCharge充电器,Magic4 Pro可以在20分钟内完全充电。还支持高达100瓦的无线充电。此外,Magic4 Pro还可以通过反向充电为其他具备Qi功能的设备充电。
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Honor Magic4 Pro 4600 mAh | Xiaomi 12 Pro 4600 mAh | OnePlus 10 Pro 5000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G 5000 mAh | Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max 4352 mAh | Google Pixel 6 Pro 5003 mAh | Oppo Find X5 Pro 5000 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 10% | 2% | 11% | 30% | 11% | 12% | -14% | 2% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.87 | 0.94 -8% | 0.7 20% | 0.58 33% | 0.6 31% | 0.7 20% | 1.24 -43% | 1.255 ? -44% | 0.902 ? -4% |
Idle Average * | 2.04 | 1.24 39% | 1.1 46% | 0.71 65% | 1.5 26% | 1 51% | 1.39 32% | 2.02 ? 1% | 1.448 ? 29% |
Idle Maximum * | 2.26 | 1.34 41% | 1.7 25% | 1.16 49% | 1.6 29% | 1.04 54% | 1.42 37% | 2.21 ? 2% | 1.608 ? 29% |
Load Average * | 4.97 | 5.7 -15% | 6.4 -29% | 7.07 -42% | 3.5 30% | 6.87 -38% | 3.58 28% | 5.49 ? -10% | 6.1 ? -23% |
Load Maximum * | 7.46 | 8.12 -9% | 11.3 -51% | 11.32 -52% | 4.8 36% | 9.87 -32% | 6.99 6% | 8.75 ? -17% | 9.04 ? -21% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 nits)
Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 nits)
电池寿命
Honor Magic4 Pro使用4600毫安时的电池,导致整体运行时间相当长。然而,我们的真实世界Wi-Fi测试(150尼特)似乎对智能手机的负担特别大,在这种情况下,它没有像大多数竞争对手那样持续很长时间,而是落在了与 Pixel 6 Pro.也就是说,电池寿命仍然很好,足以应付一整天的使用。
Honor Magic4 Pro 4600 mAh | Xiaomi 12 Pro 4600 mAh | OnePlus 10 Pro 5000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G 5000 mAh | Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max 4352 mAh | Google Pixel 6 Pro 5003 mAh | Oppo Find X5 Pro 5000 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 7% | 3% | 21% | 59% | -3% | 5% | |
Reader / Idle | 1346 | 2036 51% | 1617 20% | 1973 47% | 2846 111% | 1269 -6% | |
H.264 | 995 | 788 -21% | 1121 13% | 1078 8% | 1522 53% | 1142 15% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 687 | 766 11% | 767 12% | 844 23% | 1067 55% | 667 -3% | 788 15% |
Load | 389 | 337 -13% | 255 -34% | 410 5% | 452 16% | 367 -6% |
Pros
Cons
结论 -Honor ,强势复出
通过Magic4 Pro,Honor ,试图通过向我们展示一款装备精良的高端智能手机来重温并不遥远的光辉岁月,它不需要躲避其竞争对手。
主要焦点在于相机设置,在我们的测试中产生了良好的效果,在视频拍摄能力方面似乎也取得了很大的进步。也就是说,在写这篇文章时,录制视频仍然不是一个完全流畅的体验。然而,我们相信视频卡顿的问题将在下一次更新中得到解决。
Honor Magic4 Pro是一款高端智能手机,具有良好的功能,能够以良好的相机、IP68认证、极快的充电速度和吸引人的设计而大放异彩。
凭借其明亮的LTPO显示屏、快速的Wi-Fi、IP68认证、快速的有线和无线充电、带桌面模式的USB 3.2以及快速的处理器,Honor 设备几乎没有留下任何不足之处。在Wi-Fi连接方面有一些小缺点,它不包括6GHz的频率。此外,显示屏的峰值亮度还可以再高一点。
如果你需要一个具有更大亮度的显示屏,可以选择 Galaxy S22 Ultra可能值得关注,因为它还具有更长的保证更新期。这款像素6 Pro是另一个潜在的选择,它有一个好的摄像头和一个低价格。
价格和可用性
对于非美国的客户,Honor Magic4 Pro在Honor "自己的商店 "上的售价约为1100欧元(建议零售价)。 并经常附带一些额外的产品,如外壳、智能手表或充电站。另外,这款智能手机还可以在非美国的在线零售商,如Amazon.co.uk和进口商店,如Tradingshenzhen分别售价约800英镑和975美元。
Honor Magic4 Pro
-
08/30/2022 v7 (old)
Daniel Schmidt