Honor MagicBook 15 (2021)评测 - 转向英特尔是不必要的费用

Name: Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7
Brand: Honor

2021年没有太多新东西。

Honor MagicBook是去年最好的多媒体笔记本之一，当它涉及到性价比时。现在有了目前的Tiger Lake 处理器而不是AMD芯片，但这也使价格增加了约300欧元（约356美元）。这是否合理？

Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by DeepL/Stefan Hinum), Published 08/14/2021 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Laptop / Notebook Ultrabook Windows Tiger Lake

有了魔法书15 Honor ，去年推出了一款15英寸的多媒体笔记本，具有非常好的性价比。在最新的模型中，AMD Ryzen 4000处理器已被英特尔的当前Tiger Lake 芯片取代。然而，其他方面没有什么变化，但在我们的测试配置中，价格攀升至949欧元（约1126美元）。因此，MagicBook 15还必须面对部分配备了专用显卡的竞争对手。

Test device courtesy of Honor

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 (Magicbook Series)

Processor

Intel Core i5-1135G7 4 x 2.4 - 4.2 GHz, 38 W PL2 / Short Burst, 20 W PL1 / Sustained, Tiger Lake-UP3

Graphics adapter

Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Core: 1300 MHz, RAM: 1200 MHz

Memory

16 GB

, DDR4-3200, Dual-Channel, soldered

Display

15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, BOE TV156FHM-NH2, IPS, glossy: no, 60 Hz

Mainboard

Intel Tiger Lake-UP3 PCH-LP

Storage

WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G, 512 GB

, 410 GB free

Soundcard

Intel Tiger Lake-U/Y PCH-LP - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)

Connections

1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm Stereo

Networking

Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.1

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 17 x 358 x 230

Battery

42 Wh, 3665 mAh Lithium-Polymer

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 720p
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: no, 65W PSU, PC Manager, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

1.521 kg, Power Supply: 197 g

Price

949 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Possible competitors in comparison

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
83.6 % v7 ^(old)	08 / 2021	Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	1.5 kg	17 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
81.2 % v7 ^(old)	07 / 2021	HP Pavilion 15-eg i7-1165G7, GeForce MX450	1.7 kg	17.9 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
83.2 % v7 ^(old)		Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 i7-11370H, GeForce MX450	1.7 kg	16 mm	15.60"	3200x2000
82.8 % v7 ^(old)	02 / 2022	Lenovo ThinkBook 15 Gen2 ITL i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	1.8 kg	18.9 mm	15.60"	1920x1080

案例与设备

Honor ，继续使用熟悉的金属外壳，这仍然给人留下良好的印象。灰色表面和蓝色设计元素（周围的屏幕边缘，Honor 标志）的组合看起来不错，在稳定性方面也没有什么可抱怨的。你在盖子上施加很大的压力会引起轻微的图像错误，但这在正常使用中不应该是一个问题。Honor ，仍然依赖于16：9的面板，但屏幕的边缘在侧面和上边缘非常窄，这就是为什么该设备看起来仍然很现代。

底部的盖子可以拆掉（Torx T5），你可以接触到风扇和M.2-2280固态硬盘，但WLAN模块不能再被替换。理论上，还有空间放置2.5英寸的驱动器，但必要的安装部件和电缆都没有。

Size comparison

HP Pavilion 15-eg Lenovo ThinkBook 15 Gen2 ITL Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 DIN A4 ❌

装备

端口方面没有变化。除了也用于充电的USB-C接口，仍然有两个普通的USB-A接口。然而，右侧只有USB 2.0速度，这在2021年是不可理解的。Thunderbolt也不存在。

WLAN模块（英特尔AX201）是最新的Wi-Fi 6，在我们与路由器Netgear Nighthawk RAX120的标准化WLAN测试中也取得了非常好的传输速率。在这里，我们看到一个明显的改进，与旧的 AMD MagicBook 15(Wi-Fi 5)。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Lenovo ThinkBook 15 Gen2 ITL Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1426 (1307^min - 1478^max) MBit/s +2%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1420 (686^min - 1498^max) MBit/s +1%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1400 (1264^min - 1496^max) MBit/s
HP Pavilion 15-eg Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1197 (1057^min - 1282^max) MBit/s -14%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (49.8 - 1775, n=324)	1161 MBit/s -17%
Honor MagicBook 15 4500U Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC	658 (347^min - 742^max) MBit/s -53%
iperf3 receive AX12
Lenovo ThinkBook 15 Gen2 ITL Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1554 (1438^min - 1630^max) MBit/s +12%
HP Pavilion 15-eg Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1434 (1199^min - 1500^max) MBit/s +4%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1385 (910^min - 1612^max) MBit/s
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1343 (650^min - 1573^max) MBit/s -3%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (136 - 1743, n=324)	1261 MBit/s -9%
Honor MagicBook 15 4500U Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC	655 (577^min - 680^max) MBit/s -53%

Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1384 (910-1612)

Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1400 (1264-1496)

ColorChecker Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7: 7.43 ∆E min: 2.08 - max: 13.69 ∆E

输入设备 -Honor 再也没有键盘照明了

键盘上略微粗糙的按键仍然很体面。按键的落差有限，但反馈很精确，我们没有发现任何问题。ClickPad也是如此，它能产生相当响亮的点击声。然而，我们无法理解的是，它再次缺乏键盘背光灯。MagicBook 14和MagicBook Pro 16都有背光，而那些经常在黑暗环境中工作的人很快就会为缺少照明而感到烦恼。

显示屏 - MagicBook 15采用16:9 IPS面板

面板的基本特征保持不变（全高清，IPS，300 cd/m²），但Honor ，使用了与京东方不同的面板。不再有PWM闪烁，亮度也比广告宣称的要高一些。我们测得的平均亮度略低于320cd/m²，黑值为0.27cd/m²，这导致了一个非常好的对比度。哑光面板的主观画面印象很好，即使是明亮的表面看起来也不会有太多的颗粒感。只有在上边缘有极少的屏幕渗漏，但这只有在全亮度和深色背景下才会明显。


334 cd/m²	324 cd/m²	319 cd/m²
322 cd/m²	332 cd/m²	303 cd/m²
316 cd/m²	320 cd/m²	289 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

BOE TV156FHM-NH2 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 334 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 317.7 cd/m² Minimum: 4.6 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 329 cd/m²
Contrast: 1230:1 (Black: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1
ΔE Greyscale 5.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
67.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
96.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.07

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 BOE TV156FHM-NH2, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	HP Pavilion 15-eg Chi Mei CMN1523, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 IPS, 3200x2000, 15.6"	Lenovo ThinkBook 15 Gen2 ITL LG Philips LP156WFC-SPD7, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Honor MagicBook 15 4500U BOE0872, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Display		-34%	1%	-38%	-33%
Display P3 Coverage	65.4	42.9 -34%	66.7 2%	40.36 -38%	43.51 -33%
sRGB Coverage	96.3	64 -34%	96.3 0%	60.4 -37%	64.5 -33%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	67.5	44.4 -34%	68.5 1%	41.72 -38%	44.95 -33%
Response Times		21%	3%	-17%	-45%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	36 ?(18, 18)	22.8 ?(10, 12.8) 37%	34.8 ?(17.2, 17.6) 3%	40 ?(21.2, 18.8) -11%
Response Time Black / White *	24.8 ?(14, 10.8)	23.6 ?(13.6, 10) 5%	24 ?(12.4, 11.6) 3%	30.4 ?(17.2, 13.2) -23%	36 ?(18, 18) -45%
PWM Frequency		26320 ?(43)			5152
Screen		-50%	-29%	-68%	-47%
Brightness middle	332	294.3 -11%	312 -6%	288 -13%	272 -18%
Brightness	318	251 -21%	298 -6%	276 -13%	259 -19%
Brightness Distribution	87	76 -13%	87 0%	87 0%	85 -2%
Black Level *	0.27	0.26 4%	0.18 33%	0.26 4%	0.17 37%
Contrast	1230	1132 -8%	1733 41%	1108 -10%	1600 30%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	3.3	4.08 -24%	5.39 -63%	5.9 -79%	5.3 -61%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	7.8	19.49 -150%	9.95 -28%	18.4 -136%	18 -131%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	1	3.7 -270%	3.15 -215%	4.9 -390%	3.8 -280%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	5.2	3 42%	6.3 -21%	3.8 27%	4 23%
Gamma	2.07 ^106%	2.21 ^100%	2.192 ^100%	2.34 ^94%	2.03 ^108%
CCT	7370 ^88%	6616 ^98%	7473 ^87%	6856 ^95%	7338 ^89%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)			69	38.1	41.2
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)			96	60	64.1
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-21% / -37%	-8% / -18%	-41% / -54%	-42% / -43%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
24.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 14 ms rise
24.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 10.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 54 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 18 ms rise
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 18 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 46 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

该面板在交付状态下没有得到很好的调整。一些颜色明显偏离目标值（<3），而且还有轻微的蓝色偏光，色温有点太低。我们用专业的CalMAN软件和X-Rite i1 Pro 2分光光度计对面板进行了测量和校准，并能够显著改善显示效果。令我们惊讶的是，最大亮度也只是略有下降。由于全sRGB覆盖，你可以毫不犹豫地使用校准后的面板来编辑图片/视频。

由于采用了哑光表面，如果你不把笔记本直接对着太阳，它也可以在明亮的环境中使用。IPS面板的可视角度稳定性也非常好。

性能 -Honor 将老虎湖CPU与快速的SSD相结合

与AMD机型一样，预装的PC Manager也提供了一个性能模式，但我们无法检测到对性能或排放的任何影响。因此，下面的基准和测量都是在正常模式下进行的。

处理器 - 英特尔Tiger Lake i5-1135G7

芯片酷睿i5-1135G7来自英特尔目前的Tiger Lake ，提供四个核心（8个线程），最高可以达到4.2 GHz（或所有核心3.8 Ghz）。Honor ，功率限制分别为65瓦和28瓦。我们的处理器在4x 3.8 GHz时最大消耗约38瓦，但随后也迅速下降，在永久负载下稳定在略低于19瓦。因此，该系统主要受益于短期负载高峰期的高限制，这在日常使用中也经常发生。

Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Core i5-1135G7: Ø699 (681.19-922.04)

HP Pavilion 15-eg Intel Core i7-1165G7: Ø725 (618.81-762.14)

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H; Variable PL1 : Ø928 (765.3-1048.55)

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H; Pl1 @ 25W: Ø792 (781.11-959.72)

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H; PL1 fixed @ 28W: Ø849 (836.45-917.33)

Lenovo ThinkBook 15 Gen2 ITL Intel Core i5-1135G7: Ø868 (859.14-922.21)

Honor MagicBook 15 4500U AMD Ryzen 5 4500U: Ø892 (873.29-934.25)

酷睿i5的单核性能比老款MagicBook 15 的Ryzen 5 4500U ，但在实践中你几乎不会注意到这种差异。如果你加载所有核心，AMD芯片甚至有优势。总而言之，新的MagicBook 15的CPU性能还不错，但还可以更好。

该处理器在电池模式下最多可消耗28瓦，所以你必须考虑到这里有15%左右的赤字。

Cinebench R23: Single Core | Multi Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Single Core) | CPU (Multi Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Single 64Bit | CPU Multi 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Average of class Office (618 - 1995, n=92, last 2 years)	1563 Points +16%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H	1529 Points +13%
HP Pavilion 15-eg Intel Core i7-1165G7	1495 Points +11%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Core i5-1135G7	1350 Points
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (1062 - 1373, n=53)	1322 Points -2%

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Average of class Office (1577 - 15743, n=92, last 2 years)	9250 Points +149%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H	5639 Points +52%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H	5344 (4894.88^min - 5344.23^max) Points +44%
HP Pavilion 15-eg Intel Core i7-1165G7	4947 (4868.64^min - 4947.48^max) Points +33%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (2786 - 6136, n=55)	4724 Points +27%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Core i5-1135G7	3717 Points

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Office (229 - 764, n=92, last 2 years)	602 Points +17%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H	589 Points +15%
HP Pavilion 15-eg Intel Core i7-1165G7	575 Points +12%
Lenovo ThinkBook 15 Gen2 ITL Intel Core i5-1135G7	526 Points +2%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Core i5-1135G7	514 Points
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (375 - 527, n=62)	507 Points -1%
Honor MagicBook 15 4500U AMD Ryzen 5 4500U	439 Points -15%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Office (590 - 5980, n=92, last 2 years)	3556 Points +146%
Honor MagicBook 15 4500U AMD Ryzen 5 4500U	2347 Points +62%
Lenovo ThinkBook 15 Gen2 ITL Intel Core i5-1135G7	2226 Points +54%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H	2152 Points +49%
HP Pavilion 15-eg Intel Core i7-1165G7	1908 Points +32%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (979 - 2382, n=62)	1827 Points +26%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Core i5-1135G7	1448 Points

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H	233 Points +16%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H	231 Points +15%
Average of class Office (98 - 284, n=92, last 2 years)	230 Points +14%
HP Pavilion 15-eg Intel Core i7-1165G7	221 Points +10%
Lenovo ThinkBook 15 Gen2 ITL Intel Core i5-1135G7	203 Points +1%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Core i5-1135G7	201 Points
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (141.4 - 205, n=61)	194.4 Points -3%
Honor MagicBook 15 4500U AMD Ryzen 5 4500U	172 Points -14%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Office (246 - 2642, n=93, last 2 years)	1561 Points +69%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H	1049 (765.3^min - 1048.55^max) Points +14%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H	960 (781.11^min - 959.72^max) Points +4%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H	917 (836.45^min - 917.33^max) Points -1%
Honor MagicBook 15 4500U AMD Ryzen 5 4500U	934 (873.29^min - 934.25^max) Points +1%
Lenovo ThinkBook 15 Gen2 ITL Intel Core i5-1135G7	922 (859.14^min - 922.21^max) Points 0%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Core i5-1135G7	922 Points
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (431 - 941, n=65)	792 Points -14%
HP Pavilion 15-eg Intel Core i7-1165G7	762 (618.81^min - 762.14^max) Points -17%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Core i5-1135G7	711 Seconds *
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (499 - 1044, n=60)	662 Seconds * +7%
HP Pavilion 15-eg Intel Core i7-1165G7	603 Seconds * +15%
Honor MagicBook 15 4500U AMD Ryzen 5 4500U	566 Seconds * +20%
Lenovo ThinkBook 15 Gen2 ITL Intel Core i5-1135G7	541 Seconds * +24%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H	538 Seconds * +24%
Average of class Office (208 - 1956, n=93, last 2 years)	419 Seconds * +41%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
HP Pavilion 15-eg Intel Core i7-1165G7	5416 MIPS +38%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H	5411 MIPS +38%
Average of class Office (2972 - 6687, n=93, last 2 years)	5276 MIPS +34%
Lenovo ThinkBook 15 Gen2 ITL Intel Core i5-1135G7	4818 MIPS +23%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (3924 - 4921, n=62)	4674 MIPS +19%
Honor MagicBook 15 4500U AMD Ryzen 5 4500U	4302 MIPS +10%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Core i5-1135G7	3924 MIPS

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Average of class Office (7532 - 65460, n=93, last 2 years)	38934 MIPS +121%
Honor MagicBook 15 4500U AMD Ryzen 5 4500U	25815 MIPS +47%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H	25382 MIPS +44%
Lenovo ThinkBook 15 Gen2 ITL Intel Core i5-1135G7	24873 MIPS +41%
HP Pavilion 15-eg Intel Core i7-1165G7	22655 MIPS +29%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (14745 - 24873, n=62)	21407 MIPS +22%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Core i5-1135G7	17591 MIPS

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Average of class Office (510 - 1989, n=93, last 2 years)	1585 Points +13%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H	1574 Points +12%
Lenovo ThinkBook 15 Gen2 ITL Intel Core i5-1135G7	1428 Points +2%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Core i5-1135G7	1401 Points
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (1147 - 1428, n=58)	1373 Points -2%
Honor MagicBook 15 4500U AMD Ryzen 5 4500U	1220 Points -13%

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Average of class Office (1018 - 11980, n=92, last 2 years)	7612 Points +61%
Honor MagicBook 15 4500U AMD Ryzen 5 4500U	6234 Points +31%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H	5214 Points +10%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Core i5-1135G7	4742 Points
Lenovo ThinkBook 15 Gen2 ITL Intel Core i5-1135G7	4700 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (3475 - 5472, n=58)	4663 Points -2%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Average of class Office (1.72 - 18.7, n=91, last 2 years)	10.4 fps +84%
Honor MagicBook 15 4500U AMD Ryzen 5 4500U	7.33 fps +30%
Lenovo ThinkBook 15 Gen2 ITL Intel Core i5-1135G7	7.21 fps +27%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H	6.91 fps +22%
HP Pavilion 15-eg Intel Core i7-1165G7	6.59 fps +16%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (3.57 - 7.6, n=57)	5.93 fps +5%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Core i5-1135G7	5.66 fps

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Honor MagicBook 15 4500U AMD Ryzen 5 4500U	65.2 s * -20%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Core i5-1135G7	54.4 s *
Average of class Office (31.3 - 129.6, n=91, last 2 years)	53.2 s * +2%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (44.2 - 62.9, n=60)	52.8 s * +3%
Lenovo ThinkBook 15 Gen2 ITL Intel Core i5-1135G7	49.1 s * +10%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H	47.3 s * +13%
HP Pavilion 15-eg Intel Core i7-1165G7	45.9 s * +16%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (0.619 - 0.727, n=59)	0.642 sec * -3%
Honor MagicBook 15 4500U AMD Ryzen 5 4500U	0.623 sec * -0%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Core i5-1135G7	0.622 sec *
Lenovo ThinkBook 15 Gen2 ITL Intel Core i5-1135G7	0.619 sec * -0%
HP Pavilion 15-eg Intel Core i7-1165G7	0.56 sec * +10%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H	0.552 sec * +11%
Average of class Office (0.4244 - 1.135, n=90, last 2 years)	0.543 sec * +13%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

84.7 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.8 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

201 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

922 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

1448 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

514 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

1350 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

3717 Points

Help

... in comparison

系统性能

非常好的主观性能印象主要得益于快速的PCI-SSD和没有瓶颈的其他平衡系统。在双通道模式下，16GB的内存也应该完全满足未来几年的需求。

PCMark 10
Score
HP Pavilion 15-eg GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB	5814 Points +24%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 GeForce MX450, i7-11370H, Toshiba KBG40ZNV512G	5625 Points +20%
Average of class Office (2463 - 7344, n=86, last 2 years)	5618 Points +20%
Honor MagicBook 15 4500U Vega 6, R5 4500U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G	4851 Points +3%
Lenovo ThinkBook 15 Gen2 ITL Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Samsung PM991 MZALQ512HALU	4766 Points +2%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	4690 Points
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (4026 - 4952, n=53)	4613 Points -2%
Essentials
Average of class Office (5575 - 20841, n=86, last 2 years)	10136 Points +5%
HP Pavilion 15-eg GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB	9833 Points +2%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	9666 Points
Lenovo ThinkBook 15 Gen2 ITL Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Samsung PM991 MZALQ512HALU	9638 Points 0%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (8149 - 9917, n=53)	9310 Points -4%
Honor MagicBook 15 4500U Vega 6, R5 4500U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G	8751 Points -9%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 GeForce MX450, i7-11370H, Toshiba KBG40ZNV512G	8568 Points -11%
Productivity
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 GeForce MX450, i7-11370H, Toshiba KBG40ZNV512G	9662 Points +57%
HP Pavilion 15-eg GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB	9292 Points +51%
Average of class Office (3041 - 10415, n=86, last 2 years)	7689 Points +25%
Honor MagicBook 15 4500U Vega 6, R5 4500U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G	7481 Points +22%
Lenovo ThinkBook 15 Gen2 ITL Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Samsung PM991 MZALQ512HALU	6422 Points +5%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (5040 - 6619, n=53)	6218 Points +1%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	6140 Points
Digital Content Creation
Average of class Office (2126 - 9773, n=86, last 2 years)	6335 Points +34%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 GeForce MX450, i7-11370H, Toshiba KBG40ZNV512G	5880 Points +25%
HP Pavilion 15-eg GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB	5839 Points +24%
Lenovo ThinkBook 15 Gen2 ITL Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Samsung PM991 MZALQ512HALU	4749 Points +1%
Honor MagicBook 15 4500U Vega 6, R5 4500U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G	4734 Points 0%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	4719 Points
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (3548 - 5255, n=53)	4612 Points -2%

PCMark 10 Score		4690 points
Help

DPC延迟

正如已经与 AMD型号的MagicBook 15我们的英特尔测试仪在延迟测试中也表现得非常好，因此该笔记本也适合实时音频应用。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 GeForce MX450, i7-11370H, Toshiba KBG40ZNV512G	5117 μs * -688%
HP Pavilion 15-eg GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB	2084 μs * -221%
Lenovo ThinkBook 15 Gen2 ITL Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Samsung PM991 MZALQ512HALU	1517 μs * -134%
Honor MagicBook 15 4500U Vega 6, R5 4500U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G	658 μs * -1%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	649 μs *

* ... smaller is better

大容量存储 - 西部数据的PCI-SSD

我们测试设备中的PCIe-SSD（M.2-2280）来自制造商西部数据（SN730），提供512GB的存储容量，其中约410GB在首次启动后可供用户使用。这是一个快速的PCIe 3.0驱动器，但同样，SSD的工厂分区让我们感到困扰。系统驱动器上只有74GB的可用空间；如果你在安装或下载时不小心，这些空间很快就会被用完。更多的SSD基准测试可以在我们的技术部分.

	Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	HP Pavilion 15-eg Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB	Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Toshiba KBG40ZNV512G	Lenovo ThinkBook 15 Gen2 ITL Samsung PM991 MZALQ512HALU	Honor MagicBook 15 4500U WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G	Average WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	Average of class Office
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6		-34%	-29%	-36%	-25%	-15%	3%
Write 4K	208.5	141.6 -32%	136 -35%	148.1 -29%	161.1 -23%	164.3 ?(106.9 - 242, n=21) -21%	165.2 ?(50.1 - 291, n=58, last 2 years) -21%
Read 4K	51.6	42.61 -17%	60.4 17%	47.72 -8%	49.92 -3%	48.2 ?(36.8 - 57.9, n=21) -7%	63.9 ?(20.6 - 90.2, n=58, last 2 years) 24%
Write Seq	2579	1337 -48%	1447 -44%	1225 -53%	1799 -30%	2096 ?(1025 - 2707, n=21) -19%	2688 ?(405 - 5030, n=40, last 2 years) 4%
Read Seq	2476	1575 -36%	1507 -39%	1498 -39%	1978 -20%	2123 ?(1356 - 2553, n=21) -14%	2892 ?(507 - 5559, n=40, last 2 years) 17%
Write 4K Q32T1	602	397.8 -34%	235.6 -61%	421.1 -30%	392.5 -35%	451 ?(237 - 671, n=21) -25%	413 ?(205 - 809, n=58, last 2 years) -31%
Read 4K Q32T1	680	454.2 -33%	737 8%	360.9 -47%	506 -26%	509 ?(333 - 838, n=21) -25%	540 ?(184.2 - 899, n=58, last 2 years) -21%
Write Seq Q32T1	2706	1648 -39%	1529 -43%	1407 -48%	1806 -33%	2551 ?(1087 - 2721, n=21) -6%	3330 ?(315 - 6207, n=58, last 2 years) 23%
Read Seq Q32T1	3392	2388 -30%	2357 -31%	2362 -30%	2460 -27%	3330 ?(2869 - 3426, n=21) -2%	4456 ?(454 - 7123, n=58, last 2 years) 31%
AS SSD		-31%	-168%	-27%	-33%	-20%	-18%
Seq Read	2960	2030 -31%	1972 -33%	1965 -34%	2091 -29%	2605 ?(1786 - 3021, n=21) -12%	3452 ?(508 - 5796, n=87, last 2 years) 17%
Seq Write	2371	1003 -58%	981 -59%	836 -65%	1658 -30%	1905 ?(993 - 2486, n=21) -20%	2350 ?(294 - 5880, n=87, last 2 years) -1%
4K Read	46.48	46.74 1%	55.8 20%	50.3 8%	43.46 -6%	45.8 ?(34.7 - 53.4, n=21) -1%	58.3 ?(18 - 91.1, n=87, last 2 years) 25%
4K Write	143.6	164.2 14%	133.5 -7%	189.1 32%	141.9 -1%	155.6 ?(96.9 - 217, n=21) 8%	167.1 ?(28.2 - 350, n=87, last 2 years) 16%
4K-64 Read	1470	1098 -25%	1277 -13%	870 -41%	589 -60%	1181 ?(615 - 1483, n=21) -20%	1073 ?(182.3 - 2713, n=87, last 2 years) -27%
4K-64 Write	1806	891 -51%	313.9 -83%	871 -52%	1028 -43%	1372 ?(677 - 2346, n=21) -24%	1612 ?(183.4 - 3394, n=87, last 2 years) -11%
Access Time Read *	0.088	0.053 40%	0.15 -70%	0.126 -43%	0.064 27%	0.0801 ?(0.05 - 0.138, n=21) 9%	0.07797 ?(0.022 - 0.302, n=87, last 2 years) 11%
Access Time Write *	0.026	0.062 -138%	0.513 -1873%	0.02 23%	0.047 -81%	0.04195 ?(0.018 - 0.091, n=21) -61%	0.06914 ?(0.017 - 0.625, n=87, last 2 years) -166%
Score Read	1812	1348 -26%	1530 -16%	1117 -38%	842 -54%	1488 ?(895 - 1838, n=21) -18%	1476 ?(252 - 3364, n=87, last 2 years) -19%
Score Write	2186	1155 -47%	546 -75%	1144 -48%	1335 -39%	1718 ?(948 - 2721, n=21) -21%	2014 ?(247 - 4111, n=87, last 2 years) -8%
Score Total	4899	3149 -36%	2819 -42%	2787 -43%	2598 -47%	3938 ?(2834 - 5376, n=21) -20%	4202 ?(704 - 9204, n=87, last 2 years) -14%
Copy ISO MB/s	2520	1583 -37%	1105 -56%			1718 ?(433 - 3092, n=13) -32%	1901 ?(323 - 3870, n=75, last 2 years) -25%
Copy Program MB/s	790	682 -14%	799 1%			536 ?(257 - 790, n=13) -32%	634 ?(179.8 - 1049, n=75, last 2 years) -20%
Copy Game MB/s	1879	1428 -24%	957 -49%			1193 ?(620 - 1879, n=13) -37%	1400 ?(291 - 2780, n=75, last 2 years) -25%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-33% / -32%	-99% / -117%	-32% / -31%	-29% / -29%	-18% / -18%	-8% / -10%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3392 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2706 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 680 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 602 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 2476 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 2579 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 51.6 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 208.5 MB/s

Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

No graph data

显卡 - Xe Graphics G7，含80个EUs

酷睿i5-1135G7配备了快速集成GPU Iris Xe Graphics G7但与i7 CPU相比，使用的是稍慢的80个处理单元的版本。iGPU还受益于工作内存的双通道模式，据此，配备更快的LPDDR4x内存的型号在这里又有一点优势。

与 AMD型号的Vega 6在合成测试中，GPU性能高出约30%，总体上达到了该GPU的预期水平。与专用的比较设备 GeForce MX450又提供了约30-40％的性能。与Vega 6（Ryzen 4000）相比，Xe Graphics G7的另一个优势是视频解码器的效率更高。

在电池模式下，图形性能不会降低。

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
HP Pavilion 15-eg NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i7-1165G7	8204 Points +49%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i7-11370H	7983 Points +45%
Average of class Office (1468 - 13132, n=88, last 2 years)	6704 Points +22%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1135G7	5517 Points
Lenovo ThinkBook 15 Gen2 ITL Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1135G7	5259 Points -5%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (2246 - 6477, n=109)	5179 Points -6%
Honor MagicBook 15 4500U AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 5 4500U	4173 Points -24%

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Office (1089 - 9375, n=89, last 2 years)	4861 Points +36%
HP Pavilion 15-eg NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i7-1165G7	4753 Points +33%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i7-11370H	4435 Points +24%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (1560 - 5305, n=111)	3794 Points +6%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1135G7	3566 Points
Lenovo ThinkBook 15 Gen2 ITL Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1135G7	3146 Points -12%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
HP Pavilion 15-eg NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i7-1165G7	27532 Points +20%
Average of class Office (7982 - 58068, n=65, last 2 years)	26787 Points +17%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i7-11370H	25467 Points +11%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1135G7	22903 Points
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (6361 - 30894, n=95)	21885 Points -4%
Lenovo ThinkBook 15 Gen2 ITL Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1135G7	20451 Points -11%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
HP Pavilion 15-eg NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i7-1165G7	1945 Points +68%
Average of class Office (313 - 4109, n=89, last 2 years)	1585 Points +37%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (561 - 1511, n=108)	1172 Points +1%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1135G7	1159 Points
Lenovo ThinkBook 15 Gen2 ITL Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1135G7	1034 Points -11%

3DMark 11 Performance		5681 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		78508 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		17078 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		3232 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		1294 points
Help

... in comparison

游戏性能

由于GPU性能的提高，游戏的运行速度也更快一些，但与基于AMD的MagicBook 15相比，差距还是很大的。基于AMD的MagicBook 15的差别并不大。如果你想流畅地玩游戏，你在许多游戏中仍然被限制在最低设置。不过，至少游戏性能保持不变。更多游戏基准测试可在这里.

The Witcher 3 - continuous load test(fps)

Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G: Ø9.48 (8-11)

The Witcher 3 | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | Strange Brigade | F1 2020 | GTA V

The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
HP Pavilion 15-eg Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450	23.6 (21^min - 28^max) fps +149%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450	20 (15^min) fps +111%
Average of class Office (3.8 - 34, n=79, last 2 years)	14.8 fps +56%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (6.26 - 28, n=91)	11.2 fps +18%
Lenovo ThinkBook 15 Gen2 ITL Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	10.9 fps +15%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	9.48 (8^min, 8^P1 - 11^max) fps
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
HP Pavilion 15-eg Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450	39.7 (36^min - 45^max) fps +89%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450	34 fps +62%
Average of class Office (7.6 - 59.1, n=76, last 2 years)	27.3 fps +30%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (9.3 - 33.5, n=101)	21.6 fps +3%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	21 fps
Lenovo ThinkBook 15 Gen2 ITL Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	20.7 fps -1%
1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing
HP Pavilion 15-eg Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450	69.7 (67^min - 77^max) fps +62%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450	58 fps +35%
Average of class Office (12 - 106.3, n=68, last 2 years)	49.4 fps +15%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	43 fps
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (21.8 - 56.9, n=103)	41.9 fps -3%
Lenovo ThinkBook 15 Gen2 ITL Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	40.03 fps -7%
1920x1080 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (18.2 - 51, n=8)	32.2 fps
Average of class Office (11.3 - 39.7, n=4, last 2 years)	24.4 fps
Honor MagicBook 15 4500U AMD Ryzen 5 4500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	19.1 fps
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing
HP Pavilion 15-eg Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450	121.4 (110^min - 145^max) fps +73%
Average of class Office (16 - 177, n=75, last 2 years)	79.3 fps +13%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	70 fps
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (30.2 - 97.4, n=101)	65.4 fps -7%
Honor MagicBook 15 4500U AMD Ryzen 5 4500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	47.82 fps -32%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
3840x2160 High Quality
Average of class Office (6.3 - 7.7, n=3, last 2 years)	7 fps
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (2.98 - 6, n=3)	4.76 fps
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450	2.8 fps
2560x1440 High Quality
Average of class Office (6.33 - 22.2, n=14, last 2 years)	12.7 fps
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (5.8 - 20.3, n=15)	9.88 fps
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450	9.17 fps
1920x1080 High Quality
HP Pavilion 15-eg Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450	16.2 fps +23%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450	16.1 fps +22%
Average of class Office (3.86 - 35.7, n=87, last 2 years)	15.9 fps +20%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	13.2 fps
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (4.01 - 22, n=88)	13 fps -2%
1920x1080 Standard Quality
HP Pavilion 15-eg Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450	25.5 fps +55%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450	25 fps +52%
Average of class Office (5.8 - 51.7, n=89, last 2 years)	22.3 fps +36%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (4.47 - 25.1, n=97)	17.4 fps +6%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	16.4 fps
Lenovo ThinkBook 15 Gen2 ITL Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	14.7 fps -10%
Honor MagicBook 15 4500U AMD Ryzen 5 4500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	12.23 fps -25%
1280x720 Lite Quality
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450	55.1 fps +79%
HP Pavilion 15-eg Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450	51.5 fps +67%
Average of class Office (12.1 - 103.1, n=89, last 2 years)	41.7 fps +35%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (8.32 - 45.6, n=104)	31.6 fps +3%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	30.8 fps
Lenovo ThinkBook 15 Gen2 ITL Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	29 fps -6%
Honor MagicBook 15 4500U AMD Ryzen 5 4500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	25.38 fps -18%

Strange Brigade
2560x1440 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Office (16.5 - 34.9, n=5, last 2 years)	22.5 fps
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (14.7 - 16.5, n=2)	15.6 fps
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450	13.1 (9.3^min, 9.36^P1 - 18^max) fps
1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Office (9.6 - 56.5, n=73, last 2 years)	27.1 fps +58%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (13.6 - 26.2, n=56)	19.8 fps +16%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450	18.9 (13.9^min, 14.2^P1 - 24.7^max) fps +11%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	17.1 (5^min, 5^P1 - 264^max) fps
1920x1080 high AA:high AF:8
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450	34.2 (24.1^min, 29.1^P1 - 60.9^max) fps +67%
Average of class Office (10.8 - 64.5, n=81, last 2 years)	31 fps +51%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (11.4 - 32.3, n=80)	22.8 fps +11%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	20.5 (5^min, 5.29^P1 - 233^max) fps
1920x1080 medium AA:medium AF:4
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450	38.6 (28.4^min, 31.8^P1 - 76^max) fps +57%
Average of class Office (13.4 - 77.2, n=81, last 2 years)	38 fps +54%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (6 - 48.8, n=83)	28.1 fps +14%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	24.6 (5.5^min, 6.32^P1 - 231^max) fps
1280x720 lowest AF:1
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450	104 (49.4^min, 60.8^P1 - 309^max) fps +62%
Average of class Office (37.7 - 175.7, n=81, last 2 years)	91.6 fps +43%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (22.7 - 98.7, n=81)	67.4 fps +5%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	64.2 (13.1^min, 21^P1 - 266^max) fps

F1 2020
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450	23.7 (17^min - 33^max) fps +48%
Average of class Office (12.6 - 32.5, n=2, last 2 years)	22.6 fps +41%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (12.4 - 20, n=5)	16.3 fps +2%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	16 fps
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450	39.4 (32^min - 49^max) fps +52%
Average of class Office (19.9 - 49.7, n=2, last 2 years)	34.8 fps +34%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (24.4 - 31.9, n=6)	27.6 fps +6%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	26 fps
1920x1080 Medium Preset AF:16x
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450	57 (47^min - 66^max) fps +63%
Average of class Office (24.9 - 66.3, n=2, last 2 years)	45.6 fps +30%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	35 fps
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (24.8 - 42, n=12)	32.3 fps -8%
1280x720 Ultra Low Preset
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450	126 (111^min - 144^max) fps +94%
Average of class Office (52 - 137.4, n=2, last 2 years)	94.7 fps +46%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	65 fps
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (45 - 76.6, n=10)	62.5 fps -4%

GTA V
1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
HP Pavilion 15-eg Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450	22.8 (2.67^min, 15.4^P1 - 82.8^max) fps +267%
Average of class Office (3.35 - 47.8, n=78, last 2 years)	12.7 fps +104%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (3.07 - 11.6, n=70)	7.86 fps +26%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	6.22 (2.13^min, 5.08^P1 - 85.7^max) fps
1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x
HP Pavilion 15-eg Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450	51.5 (14.9^min, 37^P1 - 117^max) fps +234%
Average of class Office (8.49 - 97.5, n=80, last 2 years)	28.8 fps +87%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (7.81 - 32, n=83)	18.3 fps +19%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	15.4 (4.94^min, 11.8^P1 - 74.7^max) fps
1920x1080 Normal/Off AF:4x
HP Pavilion 15-eg Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450	120 (42.9^min, 71.4^P1 - 216^max) fps +167%
Average of class Office (21.3 - 168.4, n=61, last 2 years)	70.8 fps +57%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (18.8 - 97.2, n=66)	55.9 fps +24%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	45 (12.9^min, 30.3^P1 - 108^max) fps
1366x768 Normal/Off AF:4x
HP Pavilion 15-eg Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450	141 (4.99^min, 83.3^P1 - 296^max) fps +135%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450	109 (85^min - 137^max) fps +82%
Average of class Office (32.1 - 171.4, n=80, last 2 years)	91.2 fps +52%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (28.9 - 133.8, n=84)	70.6 fps +18%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	59.9 (12.4^min, 37^P1 - 97^max) fps
1920x1080 Lowest Settings possible
HP Pavilion 15-eg Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450	113 (41.8^min, 71.4^P1 - 202^max) fps +126%
Average of class Office (24.8 - 174.9, n=61, last 2 years)	74.7 fps +49%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (21.5 - 98.1, n=66)	61.9 fps +24%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	50.1 (11.7^min, 34.5^P1 - 143^max) fps
1024x768 Lowest Settings possible
HP Pavilion 15-eg Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450	154 (5.45^min, 83.3^P1 - 300^max) fps +124%
Average of class Office (41.2 - 176.4, n=83, last 2 years)	103.2 fps +50%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (36.5 - 144.6, n=81)	83.1 fps +21%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	68.8 (14.1^min, 45.5^P1 - 143^max) fps

	low	med.	high	ultra
GTA V (2015)	68.8	59.9	15.4	6.22
The Witcher 3 (2015)	70	43	21	9.48
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	77.3	51.7	35.7	33.9
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	30.8	16.4	13.2
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	51.7	32.6	29.1
Strange Brigade (2018)	64.2	24.6	20.5	17.1
F1 2020 (2020)	65	35	26	16

Emission & Energy

噪声排放

仍然有一个单风扇，噪音特性与AMD型号相当。 AMD型号.稍高的数值是由于不同的（和改进的）测量麦克风造成的。从主观上讲，MagicBook 15即使在负载情况下仍然非常令人愉快，在任何情况下，噪音似乎都不会令人讨厌。没有其他电子噪音，如线圈啸叫。此外，在要求不高的任务中，风扇几乎总是保持停用状态。

Noise Level

Idle		24.6 / 24.6 / 24.6 dB(A)
Load		33.9 / 36.5 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.6 dB(A)

	Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	HP Pavilion 15-eg GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB	Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 GeForce MX450, i7-11370H, Toshiba KBG40ZNV512G	Lenovo ThinkBook 15 Gen2 ITL Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Samsung PM991 MZALQ512HALU	Honor MagicBook 15 4500U Vega 6, R5 4500U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G
Noise		-9%	-13%	-2%	-10%
off / environment *	24.6	25.4 -3%	25 -2%	24.4 1%	29.9 -22%
Idle Minimum *	24.6	25.6 -4%	25 -2%	24.4 1%	29.9 -22%
Idle Average *	24.6	25.6 -4%	26 -6%	24.4 1%	29.9 -22%
Idle Maximum *	24.6	25.6 -4%	27 -10%	27.4 -11%	30.6 -24%
Load Average *	33.9	39.2 -16%	43 -27%	30 12%	31.5 7%
Witcher 3 ultra *	33.9	39.1 -15%	42 -24%	36.3 -7%	32.3 5%
Load Maximum *	36.5	41.5 -14%	44 -21%	40.4 -11%	34.8 5%

* ... smaller is better

温度

机箱发热特别是在左侧和中间，但即使在我们用Prime95和FurMark进行的压力测试中，表面温度也只在两个地方刚刚超过40°C（104°F）的标志。总的来说，金属机箱保持非常凉爽，即使在负载下，你可以把它放在你的大腿上而没有任何问题。

在性能方面，我们再次看到，消耗量在短时间内下降，然后TDP总是在18到25瓦的范围内波动。经过一小时的测试，这导致了一个刚刚超过20瓦的平均值。

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


34.8 °C	34.7 °C	31.7 °C
35.4 °C	33.4 °C	27.4 °C
30.4 °C	27.6 °C	25.4 °C

Maximum: 35.4 °C
Average: 31.2 °C


34.1 °C	40.8 °C	40.7 °C
28.1 °C	39.4 °C	39.5 °C
26.2 °C	29.7 °C	30.4 °C

Maximum: 40.8 °C
Average: 34.3 °C

Power Supply (max.) 40.5 °C | Room Temperature 21.2 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


25.4 °C	25 °C	24.9 °C
25.4 °C	25 °C	24.2 °C
24.8 °C	24.2 °C	24 °C

Maximum: 25.4 °C
Average: 24.8 °C


25.1 °C	26 °C	26 °C
24.7 °C	25.6 °C	25.8 °C
24.1 °C	24.7 °C	25.1 °C

Maximum: 26 °C
Average: 25.2 °C

Power Supply (max.) 27.5 °C | Room Temperature 20.9 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


38.2 °C	37.6 °C	32.4 °C
37.5 °C	36.4 °C	28.9 °C
32.2 °C	28.9 °C	26.7 °C

Maximum: 38.2 °C
Average: 33.2 °C


37.1 °C	42.7 °C	42.2 °C
28.3 °C	39.6 °C	38.1 °C
27 °C	31.1 °C	32.5 °C

Maximum: 42.7 °C
Average: 35.4 °C

Power Supply (max.) 43.3 °C | Room Temperature 21.6 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.2 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.4 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.8 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.8 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.2 °C / 92 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.2 °C / 90 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (-4.5 °C / -8.1 F).

演讲者

两个立体声扬声器的效果仍然一般。低音缺乏，但中音和高音再现得相当好。这些模块对于偶尔播放YouTube视频和一些背景音乐来说绝对是足够的，但你应该使用耳机或外部扬声器来获得更多的声音质量。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 28% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 69% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 52% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

HP Pavilion 15-eg audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 23% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能源消耗

在我们的消耗测量中，MagicBook 15的英特尔型号实际上与AMD型号持平。只有在最大负荷下，处理器的高功率限制才变得明显。由于最大的65.2瓦只在短时间内应用，附带的65瓦电源完全足够。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.35 / 0.84 Watt
Idle	3.4 / 7.7 / 8.3 Watt
Load	32 / 65.2 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

Power consumption in The-Witcher-3 endurance test

Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø33.9 (32.8-45.6)

HP Pavilion 15-eg GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø55.6 (54.5-61.3)

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 GeForce MX450, i7-11370H, Toshiba KBG40ZNV512G; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø70.7 (64.4-83.8)

Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø46.5 (36.1-65.4)

HP Pavilion 15-eg GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø65.1 (63.7-65.9)

电池寿命

电池容量没有变化（42Wh），但在我们的WLAN测试中，运行时间仍然比前者差。前代产品.在我们的WLAN测试中，处理器也不时受到挑战，所以更高的短期功率限制在这里是明显的。在150cd/m²的亮度下约7.5小时，在全亮度下约6小时，都是不错的速率，但AMD型号的持续时间明显更长（+1.5至2小时）。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
Average of class Office (300 - 1349, n=90, last 2 years)	600 min +33%
Honor MagicBook 15 4500U R5 4500U, Vega 6, 42 Wh	570 min +26%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 i7-11370H, GeForce MX450, 70 Wh	493 min +9%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 42 Wh	451 min
HP Pavilion 15-eg i7-1165G7, GeForce MX450, 41 Wh	396 min -12%
Lenovo ThinkBook 15 Gen2 ITL i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 45 Wh	335 min -26%
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness
Average of class Office (291 - 807, n=44, last 2 years)	480 min +40%
Honor MagicBook 15 4500U R5 4500U, Vega 6, 42 Wh	444 min +29%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 42 Wh	343 min
Lenovo ThinkBook 15 Gen2 ITL i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 45 Wh	289 min -16%

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing (Edge 91)		7h 31min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness (Edge 91)		5h 43min

Pros

+ 无PWM的哑光IPS屏幕

+ 稳定的铝制外壳

+ 良好的系统性能

Cons

- 没有键盘背光灯

- USB 2.0

- 维护选项少

结论--MagicBook 15的高价是不对的

目前的MagicBook 15采用了Tiger Lake 处理器，只是一个小的更新。外壳以及与较慢的端口的连接保持不变，尽管英特尔处理器提供了更多的单核性能以及稍快的iGPU，但在日常使用中你几乎不会注意到这些差异。

显示屏得到了改进，现在更加闪亮了一些，而且不再有PWM闪烁。然而，在我们的实际WLAN测试中，英特尔新机型的耐力比以前差。此外，我们无法理解为什么15英寸机型仍然没有键盘照明。

英特尔处理器改进的单核性能在实践中没有被注意到，但与AMD型号相比，300欧元（约356美元）的附加费用却被注意到了。

增加的价格是最大的症结所在。这款魔法书15配备Ryzen 4000处理器的MagicBook 15售价约为600欧元（约合712美元），因此更具吸引力。甚至更大的魔法书Pro 16的价格也在900欧元左右（约合1068美元），但你会得到一个更好的整体包装。搭载英特尔Tiger-Lake处理器的新MagicBook 15当然不是一个坏设备，但考虑到与AMD版本相比，额外性能较低，尤其是功能缺失，价格实在太高。比较设备红米Book Pro 15, 惠普Pavilion 15或 ThinkBook 15在这方面提供更多。

价格和可用性

我们的评测单位Honor MagicBook 15目前在Cyberport出售，价格为949欧元（约1126美元）。.

Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 - 12/25/2022 v7 ^(old)
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis

82 / 98 → 84%

Keyboard

82%

Pointing Device

91%

Connectivity

41 / 80 → 52%

Weight

69 / 20-75 → 89%

Battery

77%

Display

86%

Games Performance

64 / 78 → 82%

Application Performance

86 / 95 → 91%

Temperature

92%

Noise

96%

Audio

77%

Camera

32 / 85 → 38%

Average

75%

84%

Office - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 459232 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Translator: Stefan Hinum - Founder, CEO, CFO - 23599 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2006

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > Honor MagicBook 15 (2021)评测 - 转向英特尔是不必要的费用

Andreas Osthoff, 2021-08-14 (Update: 2021-08-14)

Possible competitors in comparison

案例与设备

Size comparison

装备

输入设备 -Honor 再也没有键盘照明了

显示屏 - MagicBook 15采用16:9 IPS面板

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

性能 -Honor 将老虎湖CPU与快速的SSD相结合

处理器 - 英特尔Tiger Lake i5-1135G7

系统性能

DPC延迟

大容量存储 - 西部数据的PCI-SSD

Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

显卡 - Xe Graphics G7，含80个EUs

游戏性能

The Witcher 3 - continuous load test(fps)

Emission & Energy

噪声排放

温度

演讲者

Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 audio analysis

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 audio analysis

HP Pavilion 15-eg audio analysis

能源消耗

Power consumption in The-Witcher-3 endurance test

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

结论--MagicBook 15的高价是不对的

价格和可用性

More articles related to this device

Price comparison