Notebookcheck Logo

联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6的回顾。16英寸全能型产品，电池寿命良好

高端的MX450。

联想的16英寸全能型产品为办公和互联网应用提供了足够的计算能力。它还将所有现代电脑游戏流畅地带到16:10的屏幕上--至少是在高清分辨率下。Tiger Lake 处理器和GeForce MX450 GPU使这成为可能。
Geforce Laptop / Notebook Thunderbolt Tiger Lake Windows

随着IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6的推出，联想在其产品线中推出了一款时尚的全能型产品，它采用了Core i5-11300H处理器和GeForce MX450GPU。这款笔记本电脑的亮点之一是其16:10格式的16英寸显示屏。竞争对手包括小米RedmiBook Pro 15 、华为MateBook D 16 、惠普Pavilion 15 等设备。

Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 (IdeaPad 5 Pro Series)
Processor
Intel Core i5-11300H 4 x 3.1 - 4.4 GHz, 64 W PL2 / Short Burst, 40 W PL1 / Sustained, Tiger Lake-H35
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce MX450 - 2048 MB VRAM, Core: 1575 MHz, RAM: 1250 MHz, 25 W TDP, GDDR6, 30.0.14.7141, Optimus
Memory
16 GB 
, DDR4-3200, dual-channel mode, on-board, no memory slots
Display
16.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 189 PPI, Lenovo LEN160WQXGA, IPS, 120 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Tiger Lake-UP3 PCH-LP
Storage
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ, 512 GB 
, M2.2280 (NVMe), 424 GB free
Soundcard
Realtek ALC3287
Connections
1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: combined headset port, Card Reader: SD, SDHC, SDXC, TPM 2.0
Networking
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 18.4 x 356 x 251
Battery
75 Wh, 4883 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: stereo, Dolby Atmos, Keyboard: chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, McAfee LiveSafe (trial), Microsoft 365 (trial), 24 Months Warranty
Weight
1.9 kg, Power Supply: 426 g
Price
999 Euro
Links
Lenovo homepage
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible contenders in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
86 %
v7 (old)
08 / 2021
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
i5-11300H, GeForce MX450		1.9 kg18.4 mm16.00"2560x1600
81.2 %
v7 (old)
07 / 2021
HP Pavilion 15-eg
i7-1165G7, GeForce MX450		1.7 kg17.9 mm15.60"1920x1080
83.2 %
v7 (old)
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
i7-11370H, GeForce MX450		1.7 kg16 mm15.60"3200x2000
86 %
v7 (old)
04 / 2021
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
R5 4600H, Vega 6		1.7 kg18.4 mm16.10"1920x1080

外壳 - IdeaPad 5配备了一个超薄的铝制外壳

IdeaPad的超薄铝制外壳采用了哑光的银灰色（云灰色）。显示器边框为黑色。联想选择了一种时尚的、不做作的设计，表面光滑。这款笔记本电脑没有维修舱门，电池被牢牢地内置在设备中。

这台16英寸的笔记本显示出良好的制造质量。缝隙尺寸准确，没有材料突起。刚性和稳定性没有留下批评的余地。盖子和底座单元可以扭动一下，但整个情况仍在限制范围内。铰链将盖子牢牢地固定在位置上，但它们允许盖子有一点晃动。最大开孔角度约为155度。此外，用一只手打开盖子是可能的。

尽管有不同的显示格式和尺寸，但在我们的比较领域中，这些设备在尺寸方面没有太大差别。IdeaPad的重量约为1.9公斤，比竞争对手多出200克。

Size comparison

❌
369 mm 234 mm 18.4 mm 1.7 kg360.2 mm 234 mm 17.9 mm 1.7 kg356 mm 251 mm 18.4 mm 1.9 kg351 mm 242 mm 16 mm 1.7 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

连接性--联想的16英寸机配备了Thunderbolt 4。

联想为IdeaPad配备了两个USB-A插槽（USB 3.2 Gen 1）和两个USB-C插槽（1个Thunderbolt 4/USB 4.0，1个USB 2.0）。附带的电源适配器可以连接到两个USB-C端口；USB-C 2.0端口已被联想主要用于此。因此，Thunderbolt 4插槽仍可用于其他用途（扩展坞、外部GPU）。后者通过USB-C支持DisplayPort。除了HDMI输出，还有相应的2个视频输出。

这些端口位于两边的后部区域。掌托旁边的空间仍然没有电缆。如果联想将一个USB-C和一个USB-A端口分别放在设备的两侧，那就更理想了。

左侧。USB 2.0 (Type-C; Power Delivery), HDMI, Thunderbolt 4/USB 4 (Type-C; DisplayPort, Power Delivery), combo audio
左侧。USB 2.0 (Type-C; Power Delivery), HDMI, Thunderbolt 4/USB 4 (Type-C; DisplayPort, Power Delivery), combo audio
右侧。存储卡阅读器（SD），2个USB 3.2 Gen 1（Type-A）。
右侧。存储卡阅读器（SD），2个USB 3.2 Gen 1（Type-A）。

SD卡阅读器

存储卡读卡器（参考卡：AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60）的传输速率为90.6 MB/s（复制大数据块），是最快的型号之一。与戴尔XPS 15的速率相比，很明显，更多的是可能的。此外，读卡器并不能完全容纳SD卡。它们突出了17毫米。

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
120.5 MB/s
Average of class Multimedia
  (18.4 - 201, n=60, last 2 years)
102.1 MB/s
HP Pavilion 15-eg
  (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
66.7 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
252.6 MB/s +179%
Average of class Multimedia
  (25.8 - 266, n=59, last 2 years)
142.7 MB/s +58%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
  (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
90.6 MB/s
HP Pavilion 15-eg
  (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
77.8 MB/s -14%

沟通

WLAN芯片（英特尔AX201）支持802.11a/b/g/n/ac/ax标准并提供蓝牙5功能。此外，在最佳条件下确定的数据速率（附近没有其他WLAN设备，笔记本电脑和服务器PC之间的距离很短；路由器。Netgear Nighthawk AX12）是非常好的。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1420 (686min - 1498max) MBit/s +4%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1367 (960min - 1479max) MBit/s
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1197 (1057min - 1282max) MBit/s -12%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (49.8 - 1775, n=324)
1161 MBit/s -15%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
884 (449min - 951max) MBit/s -35%
iperf3 receive AX12
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1434 (1199min - 1500max) MBit/s +7%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1343 (650min - 1573max) MBit/s 0%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1339 (1289min - 1364max) MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (136 - 1743, n=324)
1261 MBit/s -6%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1192 (1109min - 1450max) MBit/s -11%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550Tooltip
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1339 (1289-1364)
HP Pavilion 15-eg Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1433 (1199-1500)
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1343 (650-1573)
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1192 (1109-1450)
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1367 (960-1479)
HP Pavilion 15-eg Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1197 (1057-1282)
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1397 (686-1498)
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø869 (449-951)

网络摄像头

就质量而言，联想笔记本电脑的网络摄像头（0.9MP，最大1280x720像素）并不能从竞争者的摄像头中脱颖而出。当涉及到色彩准确性时，情况会好一些。偏差约为8，显然没有达到目标（DeltaE小于3），但竞争者却（勉强）被击败。

ColorChecker
12.3 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
14 ∆E
16.3 ∆E
16.3 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
22.1 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
17.1 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
19.6 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
17.5 ∆E
20.5 ∆E
1.2 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
16.6 ∆E
14.6 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ: 13.77 ∆E min: 1.18 - max: 22.07 ∆E
ColorChecker
12.2 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
16.2 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
21 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
17.8 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
1.8 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
11 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
4 ∆E
ColorChecker HP Pavilion 15-eg: 12.08 ∆E min: 1.76 - max: 21.03 ∆E
ColorChecker
3.5 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
7 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
15.9 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
9 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
18.3 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
10 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15: 9.54 ∆E min: 3.47 - max: 18.31 ∆E
ColorChecker
3.8 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
19.7 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
1.2 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6: 8.22 ∆E min: 1.18 - max: 19.72 ∆E

辅料

通常的文件都包括在笔记本电脑中。一个快速启动指南和保修信息。

维护

卸下底盖后，可以接触到这些硬件。为此，必须拆除设备底部的所有螺钉。之后，可以用平坦的铲子或关节平滑器帮助掀开底盖。然后你可以接触到固态硬盘、WLAN模块、BIOS电池、电池和风扇。内存被牢固地焊接起来了。

IdeaPad 5 Pro的内部
IdeaPad 5 Pro的内部

担保

联想为这款14英寸的产品在德国提供了两年的保修期。此外，还可以延长保修期。例如，四年的现场保修费用约为121欧元（约142美元）。

输入设备 - 联想笔记本电脑有一个背光键盘

键盘

联想为IdeaPad配备了一个背光的小键盘（包括数字键盘）。平滑、扁平的按键具有较短的行程和清晰的行程。键盘提供的阻力是令人愉快的。此外，键盘在打字过程中会有一点倾斜。不过，事实证明，这并不令人讨厌。两段式背光通过一个功能键控制。总而言之，联想提供了一个适合日常使用的键盘。

触摸板

一个具有多点触摸功能的ClickPad（约12 x 7.5厘米）可作为鼠标的替代品。光滑的表面使手指很容易在上面滑行。垫子也能对角落里的输入做出反应。它的行程很短，有一个清晰的压力点。

IdeaPad 5 Pro的输入设备
IdeaPad 5 Pro的输入设备

显示器 - 16:10格式的IPS

IdeaPad Pro配备了一个16:10格式的16英寸哑光显示屏（2560x1600像素）。亮度（321.6cd/m²）和对比度（1,319:1）都不错。此外，120赫兹的面板提供了快速的响应时间。检测不到PWM闪烁。

像素网格
像素网格
屏幕出血
屏幕出血
307
cd/m²		369
cd/m²		321
cd/m²
310
cd/m²		356
cd/m²		307
cd/m²
306
cd/m²		323
cd/m²		295
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
Lenovo LEN160WQXGA tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 369 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 321.6 cd/m² Minimum: 3 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 80 %
Center on Battery: 356 cd/m²
Contrast: 1319:1 (Black: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2.81 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
74.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
74% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.4
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Lenovo LEN160WQXGA, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"		HP Pavilion 15-eg
Chi Mei CMN1523, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"		Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
IPS, 3200x2000, 15.6"		Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
N161HCA-EA3, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.1"
Display
-39%
-7%
-6%
Display P3 Coverage
74
42.9
-42%
66.7
-10%
66.8
-10%
sRGB Coverage
98.7
64
-35%
96.3
-2%
99
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
74.5
44.4
-40%
68.5
-8%
69
-7%
Response Times
-135%
-184%
-134%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
13 ?(6, 7)
22.8 ?(10, 12.8)
-75%
34.8 ?(17.2, 17.6)
-168%
25 ?(16, 9)
-92%
Response Time Black / White *
8 ?(4, 4)
23.6 ?(13.6, 10)
-195%
24 ?(12.4, 11.6)
-200%
22 ?(12, 10)
-175%
PWM Frequency
26320 ?(43)
2500 ?(30)
Screen
-59%
-40%
15%
Brightness middle
356
294.3
-17%
312
-12%
352
-1%
Brightness
322
251
-22%
298
-7%
330
2%
Brightness Distribution
80
76
-5%
87
9%
89
11%
Black Level *
0.27
0.26
4%
0.18
33%
0.28
-4%
Contrast
1319
1132
-14%
1733
31%
1257
-5%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.4
4.08
-70%
5.39
-125%
1.35
44%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.42
19.49
-341%
9.95
-125%
2.58
42%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.81
3
-7%
6.3
-124%
2.02
28%
Gamma
2.4 92%
2.21 100%
2.192 100%
2.49 88%
CCT
6294 103%
6616 98%
7473 87%
6445 101%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
3.7
3.15
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
69
63
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
96
99
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-78% / -66%
-77% / -54%
-42% / -13%

* ... smaller is better

开箱后，显示器显示了良好的色彩再现，达到了2.4的色彩偏差（Delta E小于3）的目标。它也没有受到蓝色色调的影响。sRGB色彩空间的覆盖率为99%。AdobeRGB（75%）和DCI-P3（74%）色彩空间不能被显示器完全再现。

CalMAN - ColorChecker
CalMAN - ColorChecker
卡尔曼--灰鳞
卡尔曼--灰鳞
CalMAN - 色彩饱和度
CalMAN - 色彩饱和度

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4 ms rise
↘ 4 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
13 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6 ms rise
↘ 7 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

视角稳定的IPS面板可以从任何位置阅读。当阳光不太强烈时，在户外也可以阅读显示屏。

IdeaPad在户外（在明亮的阳光下拍摄）。
IdeaPad在户外（在明亮的阳光下拍摄）。
视角
视角

性能 -Tiger Lake 和图灵

有了IdeaPad 5 Pro，联想在其产品线中拥有一个16英寸的全能型产品，为办公和互联网应用以及电脑游戏提供足够的性能。

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
HWiNFO

测试条件

笔记本电脑提供三种性能配置（"智能冷却"、"高性能"、"省电模式"），可以通过组合键 "Fn "+"Q "在它们之间进行切换。我们使用的是 "智能冷却 "配置文件。此外，我们在 "高性能 "和 "省电 "模式下运行了一些基准测试。结果可以在比较表中找到。

节省电池模式 智能冷却 高性能
PL1 12watts 40watts 45watts
PL2 20瓦 64瓦 64瓦

处理器

Core i5-11300H四核处理器(Tiger Lake)的基本时钟速度为3.1 GHz。通过Turbo可以提高到4GHz（四个核心）或4.4GHz（一个核心）。支持超线程（每个核心两个线程）。

Cinebench R15基准的多线程测试以4GHz处理，单线程测试以2.2至4.4GHz处理。时钟率在电池电量上较低。

多线程（插入式
多线程（插入式
单线程（插入式
单线程（插入式

我们通过连续循环运行Cinebench R15基准的多线程测试至少30分钟来验证CPU Turbo在插电时是否也被持续使用。Turbo的使用程度很低。此外，高性能配置文件导致时钟速度略有增加。

省电模式允许CPU在长时间内以远低于基本时钟频率的速度运行。尽管如此，可用的处理能力对于办公室和互联网的使用是绰绰有余的。此外，该配置对噪音和热量的发展以及电池寿命都有积极的影响。

Cinebench R15 Multi endurance test

07515022530037545052560067575082590097510501125120012751350Tooltip
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 Intel Core i5-11300H: Ø954 (921.15-990.11)
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 Intel Core i5-11300H; Hoechstleistung: Ø983 (978.64-986.75)
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 Intel Core i5-11300H; Akkusparmodus: Ø517 (508.18-631.69)
HP Pavilion 15-eg Intel Core i7-1165G7: Ø725 (618.81-762.14)
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H; Variable PL1 : Ø928 (765.3-1048.55)
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H; Pl1 @ 25W: Ø792 (781.11-959.72)
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H; PL1 fixed @ 28W: Ø849 (836.45-917.33)
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ AMD Ryzen 5 4600H: Ø1378 (1362.03-1401.3)
运行CB15循环时的CPU时钟速度
运行CB15循环时的CPU时钟速度
运行CB15循环时的CPU时钟速度（高性能
运行CB15循环时的CPU时钟速度（高性能
运行CB15循环时的CPU时钟速度（省电模式）。
运行CB15循环时的CPU时钟速度（省电模式）。
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
176 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
990 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
116.6 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
2382 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
548 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
1431 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
6465 Points
Help
Cinebench R23 | Cinebench R20 | Cinebench R15 | Blender | 7-Zip 18.03 | Geekbench 5.5 | HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 | LibreOffice | R Benchmark 2.5
Cinebench R23
Single Core
Average of class Multimedia
  (878 - 2290, n=91, last 2 years)
1757 Points +23%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
1529 Points +7%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1495 Points +4%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
1431 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H (Hoechstleistung)
1418 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i5-11300H
  (1218 - 1431, n=11)
1373 Points -4%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H (Akkusparmodus)
1352 Points -6%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
1134 Points -21%
Multi Core
Average of class Multimedia
  (6936 - 30789, n=100, last 2 years)
15387 Points +138%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
7713 Points +19%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H (Hoechstleistung)
6551 Points +1%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
6465 Points
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
5639 Points -13%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
5344 (4894.88min - 5344.23max) Points -17%
Average Intel Core i5-11300H
  (3313 - 6581, n=10)
5564 Points -14%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7
4947 (4868.64min - 4947.48max) Points -23%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H (Akkusparmodus)
3313 Points -49%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Multimedia
  (341 - 853, n=86, last 2 years)
652 Points +19%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
589 Points +7%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7
575 Points +5%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
548 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H (Hoechstleistung)
543 Points -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H (Akkusparmodus)
523 Points -5%
Average Intel Core i5-11300H
  (431 - 548, n=11)
522 Points -5%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
454 Points -17%
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Multimedia
  (2681 - 11768, n=86, last 2 years)
5683 Points +139%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
3219 Points +35%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H (Hoechstleistung)
2509 Points +5%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
2382 Points
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
2152 Points -10%
Average Intel Core i5-11300H
  (1300 - 2533, n=10)
2146 Points -10%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1908 Points -20%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H (Akkusparmodus)
1300 Points -45%
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Multimedia
  (99.6 - 323, n=86, last 2 years)
257 Points +46%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
233 Points +32%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
231 Points +31%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7
221 Points +26%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
178 Points +1%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
176 Points
Average Intel Core i5-11300H
  (123 - 211, n=8)
173.4 Points -1%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Multimedia
  (1252 - 4774, n=90, last 2 years)
2435 Points +146%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
1401 (1362.03min - 1401.3max) Points +42%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H (Variable PL1 )
1049 (765.3min - 1048.55max) Points +6%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H (Pl1 @ 25W)
960 (781.11min - 959.72max) Points -3%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H (PL1 fixed @ 28W)
917 (836.45min - 917.33max) Points -7%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
990 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H (Hoechstleistung)
986 Points 0%
Average Intel Core i5-11300H
  (632 - 990, n=11)
895 Points -10%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7
762 (618.81min - 762.14max) Points -23%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H (Akkusparmodus)
632 Points -36%
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H (Akkusparmodus)
862 Seconds * -59%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7
603 Seconds * -11%
Average Intel Core i5-11300H
  (466 - 862, n=10)
572 Seconds * -6%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
542 Seconds *
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
538 Seconds * +1%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H (Hoechstleistung)
468 Seconds * +14%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
349 Seconds * +36%
Average of class Multimedia
  (107 - 502, n=84, last 2 years)
253 Seconds * +53%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Multimedia
  (3398 - 7545, n=79, last 2 years)
5722 MIPS +16%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5416 MIPS +9%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
5411 MIPS +9%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
4947 MIPS
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H (Akkusparmodus)
4941 MIPS 0%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H (Hoechstleistung)
4931 MIPS 0%
Average Intel Core i5-11300H
  (4603 - 4969, n=10)
4872 MIPS -2%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
4428 MIPS -10%
7z b 4
Average of class Multimedia
  (30592 - 121228, n=79, last 2 years)
60265 MIPS +138%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
37660 MIPS +49%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H (Hoechstleistung)
25940 MIPS +2%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
25382 MIPS 0%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
25353 MIPS
Average Intel Core i5-11300H
  (17573 - 26001, n=10)
23562 MIPS -7%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7
22655 MIPS -11%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H (Akkusparmodus)
17573 MIPS -31%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Multimedia
  (891 - 2342, n=86, last 2 years)
1818 Points +26%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
1574 Points +9%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H (Hoechstleistung)
1462 Points +1%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
1447 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H (Akkusparmodus)
1445 Points 0%
Average Intel Core i5-11300H
  (1342 - 1462, n=10)
1410 Points -3%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
1118 Points -23%
Multi-Core
Average of class Multimedia
  (4990 - 23059, n=86, last 2 years)
11967 Points +144%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
5963 Points +22%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
5214 Points +6%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H (Hoechstleistung)
4944 Points +1%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
4905 Points
Average Intel Core i5-11300H
  (3631 - 5499, n=10)
4642 Points -5%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H (Akkusparmodus)
4025 Points -18%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Average of class Multimedia
  (5.26 - 30.5, n=78, last 2 years)
16.4 fps +132%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
9.8 fps +38%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H (Hoechstleistung)
8.38 fps +18%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
7.08 fps
Average Intel Core i5-11300H
  (4.32 - 8.38, n=10)
7.04 fps -1%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
6.91 fps -2%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7
6.59 fps -7%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H (Akkusparmodus)
4.32 fps -39%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
59.5 s * -14%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
52.4 s *
Average Intel Core i5-11300H
  (43.6 - 59.4, n=10)
49.9 s * +5%
Average of class Multimedia
  (6.7 - 146.7, n=80, last 2 years)
49.6 s * +5%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
47.3 s * +10%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7
45.9 s * +12%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H (Hoechstleistung)
44.3 s * +15%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H (Akkusparmodus)
43.6 s * +17%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Average Intel Core i5-11300H
  (0.6 - 0.644, n=10)
0.619 sec * -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H (Akkusparmodus)
0.61 sec * -1%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
0.607 sec * -0%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
0.604 sec *
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H (Hoechstleistung)
0.6 sec * +1%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7
0.56 sec * +7%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
0.552 sec * +9%
Average of class Multimedia
  (0.3604 - 0.947, n=79, last 2 years)
0.484 sec * +20%

* ... smaller is better

系统性能

快速而流畅的系统没有造成任何问题。CPU为办公和互联网应用提供了足够的性能。专用的图形核心使其有可能玩电脑游戏。这伴随着良好的PCMark结果。内存（16GB，DDR4-3200，板载）以双通道模式运行。扩展内存是不可能的。

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4078 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
4971 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4067 points
PCMark 10 Score
5333 points
Help
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
PCMark 10 / Score
Average of class Multimedia
  (4542 - 8670, n=72, last 2 years)
6795 Points +27%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
5814 Points +9%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
GeForce MX450, i7-11370H, Toshiba KBG40ZNV512G
5625 Points +5%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
GeForce MX450, i5-11300H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
5333 Points
Average Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
  (4899 - 5391, n=3)
5208 Points -2%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
Vega 6, R5 4600H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
5110 Points -4%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Average of class Multimedia
  (8480 - 12420, n=72, last 2 years)
10521 Points +18%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
9833 Points +10%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
Vega 6, R5 4600H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
9123 Points +2%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
GeForce MX450, i5-11300H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
8931 Points
Average Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
  (8366 - 8931, n=3)
8742 Points -2%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
GeForce MX450, i7-11370H, Toshiba KBG40ZNV512G
8568 Points -4%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
GeForce MX450, i7-11370H, Toshiba KBG40ZNV512G
9662 Points +13%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
9292 Points +9%
Average of class Multimedia
  (6089 - 10742, n=72, last 2 years)
8932 Points +4%
Average Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
  (8292 - 9188, n=3)
8678 Points +1%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
GeForce MX450, i5-11300H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
8554 Points
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
Vega 6, R5 4600H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
7517 Points -12%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Average of class Multimedia
  (3651 - 13548, n=72, last 2 years)
9202 Points +71%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
GeForce MX450, i7-11370H, Toshiba KBG40ZNV512G
5880 Points +9%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
5839 Points +8%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
GeForce MX450, i5-11300H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
5388 Points
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
Vega 6, R5 4600H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
5283 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
  (4600 - 5388, n=3)
5057 Points -6%

DPC延迟

标准化的延迟监测测试（网页浏览、4K视频播放、高负荷的Prime95）没有发现DPC延迟的任何不正常现象。该系统似乎适用于实时视频和音频编辑。这一结论是基于我们的测试设备在测试时运行的最新软件。未来的更新可能会导致改进，甚至导致更糟糕的结果。

延迟监测
延迟监测
延迟监测
延迟监测
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
GeForce MX450, i7-11370H, Toshiba KBG40ZNV512G
5117 μs * -714%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
2084 μs * -231%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
Vega 6, R5 4600H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
722 μs * -15%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
GeForce MX450, i5-11300H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
629 μs *

* ... smaller is better

储存

三星的NVMe SSD（M.2-2280）作为系统驱动器。它的存储容量为512GB，提供非常好的传输速率。

一个NVMe SSD作为系统驱动器。
一个NVMe SSD作为系统驱动器。
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
DiskSpd
hddimg
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3559 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2973 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 707 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 640 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1974 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2138 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 52.3 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 203 MB/s
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ		HP Pavilion 15-eg
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB		Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Toshiba KBG40ZNV512G		Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ		Average Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-32%
-27%
-2%
-12%
Write 4K
203
141.6
-30%
136
-33%
147
-28%
140.8 ?(82.2 - 203, n=34)
-31%
Read 4K
52.3
42.61
-19%
60.4
15%
65.5
25%
48.6 ?(35.8 - 65.5, n=34)
-7%
Write Seq
2138
1337
-37%
1447
-32%
2680
25%
2106 ?(931 - 2896, n=33)
-1%
Read Seq
1974
1575
-20%
1507
-24%
2556
29%
2099 ?(1136 - 2754, n=33)
6%
Write 4K Q32T1
640
397.8
-38%
235.6
-63%
413.4
-35%
451 ?(326 - 640, n=34)
-30%
Read 4K Q32T1
707
454.2
-36%
737
4%
500
-29%
482 ?(332 - 707, n=34)
-32%
Write Seq Q32T1
2973
1648
-45%
1529
-49%
2978
0%
2903 ?(934 - 2994, n=34)
-2%
Read Seq Q32T1
3559
2388
-33%
2357
-34%
3567
0%
3511 ?(3246 - 3568, n=34)
-1%
AS SSD
-30%
-156%
-12%
-18%
Seq Read
2541
2030
-20%
1972
-22%
2829
11%
2412 ?(1658 - 3078, n=36)
-5%
Seq Write
2555
1003
-61%
981
-62%
2423
-5%
1983 ?(1200 - 2724, n=36)
-22%
4K Read
56
46.74
-17%
55.8
0%
42.06
-25%
53.1 ?(42.1 - 63.1, n=36)
-5%
4K Write
129.6
164.2
27%
133.5
3%
126.1
-3%
131.1 ?(96.5 - 196.7, n=36)
1%
4K-64 Read
1633
1098
-33%
1277
-22%
1481
-9%
1201 ?(585 - 1666, n=36)
-26%
4K-64 Write
1863
891
-52%
313.9
-83%
2009
8%
1726 ?(1311 - 2009, n=36)
-7%
Access Time Read *
0.077
0.053
31%
0.15
-95%
0.079
-3%
0.05525 ?(0.035 - 0.079, n=36)
28%
Access Time Write *
0.029
0.062
-114%
0.513
-1669%
0.029
-0%
0.05394 ?(0.018 - 0.151, n=36)
-86%
Score Read
1944
1348
-31%
1530
-21%
1806
-7%
1495 ?(843 - 2013, n=36)
-23%
Score Write
2248
1155
-49%
546
-76%
2377
6%
2055 ?(1598 - 2377, n=36)
-9%
Score Total
5192
3149
-39%
2819
-46%
5087
-2%
4303 ?(2927 - 5307, n=36)
-17%
Copy ISO MB/s
2246
1583
-30%
1105
-51%
1358
-40%
1894 ?(1358 - 2452, n=24)
-16%
Copy Program MB/s
861
682
-21%
799
-7%
407.1
-53%
539 ?(72.2 - 920, n=24)
-37%
Copy Game MB/s
1552
1428
-8%
957
-38%
918
-41%
1193 ?(388 - 1725, n=24)
-23%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-31% / -31%
-92% / -109%
-7% / -8%
-15% / -16%

* ... smaller is better

Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

No graph data

图形卡

专用GeForce MX450图形核心是Nvidia最新的中档型号。该GPU是基于与GeForce GTX 1650图形核心相同的图灵芯片。Nvidia在其产品组合中拥有四种MX450的变体。IdeaPad配备的是变体2。

GPU时钟速率 内存 内存时钟速率 内存接口 TGP
变体1 1,395 - 1,575 MHz GDDR6 5,001 MHz 128 Bit 28.5 watts
变体2 1,395 - 1,575 MHz GDDR6 5,001 MHz 64 Bit 25 watts
变体3 1,395 - 1,575 MHz GDDR5 3,501 MHz 64 Bit 25 watts
变体4 720 - 930 MHz GDDR6 5,001 MHz 64 Bit 12 watts

16-incher提供了迄今为止我们能够确定的MX450的最佳3DMark结果。GDDR6图形存储器（2,048 MB）可能是造成这种情况的原因。到目前为止，我们看到的25瓦MX450 GPU通常 "只 "配备了较慢的GDDR5内存。此外，集成的Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUsGPU是活跃的，而且该笔记本电脑与Nvidia的Optimus图形切换解决方案一起工作。

3DMark 11 Performance
9495 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
51935 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
21040 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
5190 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
2498 points
Help
3DMark 11 | 3DMark
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Multimedia
  (3505 - 60250, n=77, last 2 years)
20075 Points +110%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i5-11300H
9580 Points
HP Pavilion 15-eg
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i7-1165G7
8204 Points -14%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450
  (6341 - 9580, n=16)
8129 Points -15%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i7-11370H
7983 Points -17%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
4505 Points -53%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Average of class Multimedia
  (14679 - 130614, n=38, last 2 years)
56887 Points +68%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i5-11300H
33806 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450
  (25467 - 33806, n=13)
29167 Points -14%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i7-1165G7
27532 Points -19%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i7-11370H
25467 Points -25%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
23044 Points -32%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Multimedia
  (1835 - 46022, n=80, last 2 years)
14437 Points +159%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i5-11300H
5573 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450
  (4336 - 5753, n=17)
4869 Points -13%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i7-1165G7
4753 Points -15%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i7-11370H
4435 Points -20%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
2985 Points -46%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Multimedia
  (622 - 17620, n=81, last 2 years)
5446 Points +137%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i5-11300H
2300 Points
HP Pavilion 15-eg
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i7-1165G7
1945 Points -15%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450
  (1086 - 2300, n=16)
1796 Points -22%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
914 Points -60%

游戏性能

我们数据库中的大多数游戏在高清分辨率和低到中等质量水平下都能达到可玩的帧率。对硬件要求适中的标题允许选择更高的设置。IdeaPad在迄今为止测试的MX450笔记本电脑中，在游戏方面也是名列前茅，它几乎在整个过程中提供了最佳的帧率。此外，高性能配置文件有时会导致帧率的小幅增加。

The Witcher 3 | Dota 2 Reborn | X-Plane 11.11 | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | GTA V | Strange Brigade | Dirt 5 | Far Cry 5 | Shadow of the Tomb Raider | Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order | F1 2021
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average of class Multimedia
  (11.2 - 290, n=73, last 2 years)
100.8 fps +136%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
42.8 (12.2min, 16.6P0.1, 29.7P1 - 169max) fps
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
39.7 (36min - 45max) fps -7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450
  (21 - 46, n=16)
34.8 fps -19%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
34 fps -21%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
19.4 fps -55%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (Hoechstleistung)
97.4 (85.5min) fps +2%
Average of class Multimedia
  (26.3 - 179.9, n=82, last 2 years)
96.4 fps +1%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
95.5 (80.2min) fps
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
87.7 (75.1min) fps -8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450
  (34.9 - 104.6, n=20)
79.9 fps -16%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
79.4 (72.2min) fps -17%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
45.3 (41.6min) fps -53%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (Akkusparmodus)
42.7 (39.8min) fps -55%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Average of class Multimedia
  (23 - 141.1, n=82, last 2 years)
66.8 fps +7%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
66 fps +5%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (Hoechstleistung)
65.6 fps +5%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
62.6 fps
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
57.7 fps -8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450
  (35.4 - 71.4, n=20)
54.9 fps -12%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (Akkusparmodus)
35.4 fps -43%
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
28.8 fps -54%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1280x720 Lite Quality
Average of class Multimedia
  (19 - 225, n=68, last 2 years)
101.3 fps +55%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (1.3, Hoechstleistung)
72.2 fps +11%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (1.3)
65.3 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450
  (27.6 - 72.2, n=16)
57.3 fps -12%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (1.3)
55.1 fps -16%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (1.3)
51.5 fps -21%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (1.3, Akkusparmodus)
27.6 fps -58%
GTA V - 1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x
Average of class Multimedia
  (11.9 - 186.1, n=81, last 2 years)
96.7 fps +42%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
68.3 (24.7min, 45.5P1 - 145max) fps
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (Hoechstleistung)
68.1 (23.2min, 45.5P1 - 133max) fps 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450
  (30.6 - 68.3, n=11)
54.1 fps -21%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
51.5 (14.9min, 37P1 - 117max) fps -25%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (Akkusparmodus)
30.6 (7.8min, 22.7P1 - 82.7max) fps -55%
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 high AA:high AF:8
Average of class Multimedia
  (12.8 - 244, n=78, last 2 years)
100.7 fps +116%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
46.7 (38.7min, 39.3P1 - 62.7max) fps
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (1.47.22.14 D3D12, Hoechstleistung)
46.3 (34.8min, 39P1 - 77.3max) fps -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450
  (19.2 - 46.7, n=12)
39.2 fps -16%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
34.2 (24.1min, 29.1P1 - 60.9max) fps -27%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (1.47.22.14 D3D12, Akkusparmodus)
19.2 (13.9min, 14.2P1 - 28.1max) fps -59%
Dirt 5 - 1280x720 Ultra Low Preset
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (Hoechstleistung)
94.2 (52.7min, 57.7P0.1, 75.4P1 - 125.8max) fps +2%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
92.8 (48.3min, 56.7P0.1, 73.4P1 - 156.8max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450
  (75.7 - 94.2, n=3)
87.6 fps -6%
Average of class Multimedia
  (last 2 years)
44.7 fps -52%
Far Cry 5 - 1280x720 Low Preset AA:T
Average of class Multimedia
  (37 - 187, n=50, last 2 years)
106.8 fps +14%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (Hoechstleistung)
96 (83min - 111max) fps +2%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
94 (73min - 110max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450
  (47 - 96, n=8)
75.9 fps -19%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1280x720 Lowest Preset
Average of class Multimedia
  (56 - 204, n=9, last 2 years)
132.4 fps +34%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
99 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450
  (74.4 - 99, n=3)
84.8 fps -14%
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order - 1920x1080 Medium Preset
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
51.2 (6.26min, 6.5P0.1, 28.6P1 - 86.3max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450
  (39 - 51.2, n=2)
45.1 fps -12%
F1 2021 - 1280x720 Ultra Low Preset
Average of class Multimedia
  (114.8 - 441, n=12, last 2 years)
251 fps +56%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (800360)
161 (128min, 114P1 - 179max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450
  (115 - 174, n=3)
150 fps -7%

为了验证帧率是否在很长一段时间内保持基本稳定，我们让游戏《Witcher 3》在全高清分辨率和最高质量设置下运行了约60分钟。角色没有被移动。没有发现帧率的下降。

The Witcher 3 FPS diagram

1823Tooltip
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 i5-11300H, GeForce MX450: Ø26 (25-27)
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 i7-11370H, GeForce MX450: Ø19.9 (18-22)
在我们的TheWitcher 3 测试中，GPU的测量结果
在我们的TheWitcher 3 测试中，GPU的测量结果
lowmed.highultraQHD
GTA V (2015) 165 154 68.3 30.5 10.9
The Witcher 3 (2015) 136 81.4 42.8 24.3
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 123 112 104 95.5
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 65.3 33 21.2 13.5
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 88.3 73.4 62.6
Far Cry 5 (2018) 94 41 35 33 20
Strange Brigade (2018) 134 53.2 46.7 32.2 22.4
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 99 36 26 19 13
Battlefield V (2018) 99.1 53.2 41.6 31.9 22.4
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order (2019) 51.2 42 35.7 25.9
Red Dead Redemption 2 (2019) 63 25.8
Gears Tactics (2020) 187.2 72 48.7 30.7 20.2
Death Stranding (2020) 55.5 25.9 25.1 23.7 15
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) 51 29 24 9 7
Crysis Remastered (2020) 108 32.2 17 9.92
Serious Sam 4 (2020) 96.6 19 14.1
Mafia Definitive Edition (2020) 71.9 33 29.9 19.3
Watch Dogs Legion (2020) 49.2 26.8 20 7.61 4.67
Dirt 5 (2020) 92.8 25.8 16.3 11.4 8.6
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla (2020) 51 17 13 11 7
Yakuza Like a Dragon (2020) 91.7 34.4 33.3 29 17.9
Immortals Fenyx Rising (2020) 65 24 21 19 12
Cyberpunk 2077 1.0 (2020) 39.5 17.5 11.4 4.1
Hitman 3 (2021) 79.2 41.7 30.3 26.9 17.7
Outriders (2021) 80 31.9 25.9 22.5 17.9
Resident Evil Village (2021) 42.2 22.5 20.6 14.7 10.3
Mass Effect Legendary Edition (2021) 90 64.9 41.2
Days Gone (2021) 77.7 29.9 26.7 15.2 10.3
Monster Hunter Stories 2 (2021) 136 83 72.9 58.1
F1 2021 (2021) 161 57.7 46.9

排放 - 联想笔记本电脑可以安静地运行

噪声排放

笔记本电脑在整个负载范围内不会产生过多的噪音。在日常使用中（办公室、互联网），该设备通常是静音的--风扇大多是静止的。在压力测试中，声压级是可以接受的36.5 dB(A)。当笔记本电脑处于较重的负载下时，声压级会在短时间内上升到44.5 dB(A)。

笔记本电脑的噪音发展与性能配置密切相关。如果高性能配置被激活，风扇在负载下持续高速运行。智能冷却模式使风扇尽可能安静地工作。在像压力测试这样的负载情况下，配置文件之间的差异是非常明显的。

Noise Level

Idle
25 / 25 / 25 dB(A)
Load
44.5 / 36.5 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 25 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2029.821.322.829.82540.526.823.240.53134.230.330.834.2402420.821.3245034.733.419.934.76321.21917.221.28021.317.513.421.310026.718.313.226.712525.920.713.525.916021.122.313.321.120021.424.612.821.425020.526.212.120.531522.229.611.822.240023.229.410.823.250022.82810.922.863022.9281122.98002329.411.223100025.633.411.125.6125024.832.711.724.8160022.831.111.622.8200024.934.712.224.9250022.833.912.522.8315022.232.712.622.2400023.332.71323.3500030.432.513.530.4630024.232.613.724.2800021.433.61421.41000020.133.815.420.11250017.128.315.517.11600013.818.313.713.8SPL36.544.524.836.5N2.54.90.62.5median 22.8median 29.6median 12.6median 22.8Delta1.53.711.5hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseLenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
i5-11300H, GeForce MX450		HP Pavilion 15-eg
i7-1165G7, GeForce MX450		Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
i7-11370H, GeForce MX450		Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
R5 4600H, Vega 6		Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450
 		Average of class Multimedia
 
Noise
-2%
-5%
1%
-3%
-2%
off / environment *
25
25.4
-2%
25
-0%
25.5
-2%
25.2 ?(23.3 - 26.6, n=16)
-1%
24 ?(19.4 - 26.5, n=85, last 2 years)
4%
Idle Minimum *
25
25.6
-2%
25
-0%
25.5
-2%
25.2 ?(23.3 - 26.6, n=16)
-1%
24.3 ?(20.1 - 30.9, n=85, last 2 years)
3%
Idle Average *
25
25.6
-2%
26
-4%
25.5
-2%
25.9 ?(24.2 - 31.7, n=16)
-4%
24.8 ?(20.1 - 31.8, n=85, last 2 years)
1%
Idle Maximum *
25
25.6
-2%
27
-8%
25.5
-2%
26.3 ?(24.2 - 30.2, n=15)
-5%
26.3 ?(20.1 - 36.8, n=85, last 2 years)
-5%
Load Average *
44.5
39.2
12%
43
3%
33
26%
40.8 ?(30.4 - 48, n=16)
8%
38.2 ?(23.7 - 59.7, n=84, last 2 years)
14%
Load Maximum *
36.5
41.5
-14%
44
-21%
42.1
-15%
42.3 ?(30.6 - 52.9, n=16)
-16%
46.4 ?(29.6 - 62.6, n=85, last 2 years)
-27%
Witcher 3 ultra *
39.1
42

* ... smaller is better

温度

压力测试中的IdeaPad。
压力测试中的IdeaPad。

在日常使用中（办公室、互联网），笔记本电脑几乎没有升温。箱子的温度始终保持在绿色范围内。然而，这在高负荷情况下已经结束。在压力测试中，一些测量点的温度超过了50°C（约122°F）和60°C（约140°F）。这是由于适度的风扇使用造成的。为了获得更好的冷却效果，需要使用高性能配置文件。

当电源适配器插入时，机箱在后面的USB-C端口周围发热。需要电源适配器提供的电力越多，温度就越高。不过，没有烧伤的风险。

CPU和GPU开始进行压力测试（Prime95和FurMark至少运行一个小时），速度分别为4 GHz和1,600 MHz。随着测试的进行，速度分别下降到3.1 GHz和略低于1,400 MHz。压力测试代表了一种极端情况。我们用这个测试来检查系统是否在全负荷下保持稳定。

Max. Load
 57 °C65.3 °C48.4 °C 
 43.4 °C55.5 °C39.9 °C 
 35.7 °C38.3 °C34.1 °C 
Maximum: 65.3 °C
Average: 46.4 °C
53.1 °C55.4 °C47.1 °C
38.8 °C53.7 °C34.2 °C
31 °C44.8 °C33.8 °C
Maximum: 55.4 °C
Average: 43.5 °C
Power Supply (max.)  68.6 °C | Room Temperature 22.3 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 46.4 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 65.3 °C / 150 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 55.4 °C / 132 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.3 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 38.3 °C / 100.9 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-9.5 °C / -17.1 F).
热力图--顶部(负载)
热力图--顶部(负载)
热力图--顶部（空闲时）。
热力图--顶部（空闲时）。
热力图--底部(负载)
热力图--底部(负载)
热力图--底部（空闲时）。
热力图--底部（空闲时）。
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
i5-11300H, GeForce MX450		HP Pavilion 15-eg
i7-1165G7, GeForce MX450		Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
i7-11370H, GeForce MX450		Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
R5 4600H, Vega 6		Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450
 		Average of class Multimedia
 
Heat
6%
-3%
12%
3%
8%
Maximum Upper Side *
65.3
44
33%
54
17%
42.6
35%
48.1 ?(39.1 - 65.3, n=16)
26%
43.1 ?(26 - 59, n=87, last 2 years)
34%
Maximum Bottom *
55.4
53.4
4%
52
6%
41.7
25%
52.2 ?(36.6 - 67.8, n=16)
6%
46 ?(25 - 62.4, n=87, last 2 years)
17%
Idle Upper Side *
25.4
27.4
-8%
33
-30%
27.8
-9%
28.1 ?(23.8 - 33.6, n=16)
-11%
28.2 ?(21.2 - 41.7, n=85, last 2 years)
-11%
Idle Bottom *
26.8
28.8
-7%
28
-4%
27.6
-3%
28.9 ?(24.8 - 34, n=16)
-8%
28.9 ?(21.4 - 39.8, n=85, last 2 years)
-8%

* ... smaller is better

发言人

立体声扬声器产生了一个体面的声音，几乎不包括任何低音。建议使用耳机或外部扬声器以获得更好的声音体验。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2022.222.822.22526.923.226.93132.330.832.34026.121.326.15034.919.934.96319.417.219.48018.313.418.310022.413.222.412528.713.528.716035.113.335.120035.412.835.425046.812.146.831556.811.856.840063.810.863.85006610.96663066.11166.180070.911.270.9100068.311.168.3125066.511.766.5160067.411.667.4200067.412.267.4250059.412.559.4315061.912.661.9400061.91361.9500052.313.552.3630058.313.758.3800067.51467.51000073.115.473.11250069.615.569.61600060.413.760.4SPL78.424.878.4N42.80.642.8median 61.9median 12.6median 61.9Delta9.419.423.922.823.930.135.930.129.830.629.822.125.622.132.124.732.12322.1232221.12224.422.324.433.717.233.745.315.445.348.113.548.149.215.549.25814.75863.619.463.662.813.362.863.912.963.964.712.264.766.912.966.966.313.166.368.112.468.167.91367.96413.26463.613.163.663.613.263.663.413.563.465.113.665.165.913.565.96413.66460.913.460.95412.65477.325.677.341.50.741.5median 63.6median 13.4median 63.66.116.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 74% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 57% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (68.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 0.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能源管理 - IdeaPad Pro提供良好的电池寿命

能源消耗

这台笔记本电脑在能源消耗方面没有显示出任何不正常的情况。对于安装在这里的硬件来说，该比率处于正常水平。类似装备小米RedmiBook Pro 15

的能耗也在同一水平。

联想笔记本电脑的GPU以相当稳定的功耗（平均72.4瓦）执行我们的TheWitcher 3测试。在压力测试期间，由于CPU和GPU的时钟速率下降，功耗随着时间的推移略有下降。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.45 / 4.6 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 5 / 9 / 9.4 Watt
Load midlight 71 / 99 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy

Energy consumption during our The Witcher 3 test / stress test

0102030405060708090100Tooltip
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 i5-11300H, GeForce MX450; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø72.4 (69.7-85.3)
HP Pavilion 15-eg i7-1165G7, GeForce MX450; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø55.6 (54.5-61.3)
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ R5 4600H, Vega 6; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø40.5 (39-50.4)
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 i5-11300H, GeForce MX450; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø100.7 (94.5-105)
HP Pavilion 15-eg i7-1165G7, GeForce MX450; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø65.1 (63.7-65.9)
Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ R5 4600H, Vega 6; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø66.5 (65.9-67.4)
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
i5-11300H, GeForce MX450		HP Pavilion 15-eg
i7-1165G7, GeForce MX450		Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
i7-11370H, GeForce MX450		Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
R5 4600H, Vega 6		Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450
 		Average of class Multimedia
 
Power Consumption
5%
-7%
21%
6%
-25%
Idle Minimum *
5
4.9
2%
6
-20%
5.2
-4%
4.91 ?(3 - 9.5, n=16)
2%
6.78 ?(2.17 - 21.1, n=86, last 2 years)
-36%
Idle Average *
9
7.9
12%
9
-0%
8.2
9%
8.36 ?(4.9 - 14.1, n=16)
7%
11.3 ?(4.6 - 30, n=86, last 2 years)
-26%
Idle Maximum *
9.4
14.2
-51%
12
-28%
9.4
-0%
11.1 ?(5.7 - 14.9, n=16)
-18%
13.4 ?(5.6 - 30.4, n=86, last 2 years)
-43%
Load Average *
71
64.3
9%
74
-4%
40
44%
58.4 ?(25 - 79.5, n=16)
18%
71.1 ?(14.3 - 147, n=84, last 2 years)
-0%
Witcher 3 ultra *
72.4
55.6
23%
70.7
2%
40.5
44%
Load Maximum *
99
65.4
34%
91
8%
67
32%
76.2 ?(50.4 - 104, n=16)
23%
117.3 ?(47.7 - 270, n=85, last 2 years)
-18%

* ... smaller is better

电池寿命

在Wi-Fi测试（通过脚本访问网站）和视频测试（短片Big Buck Bunny（H.264编码，全高清）循环运行）中，这台16英寸笔记本的运行时间分别达到9:03小时和10:25小时。在这两项测试中，笔记本电脑的省电功能被禁用，显示亮度被设置为约150cd/m²。此外，在视频测试中，无线模块被禁用。

联想笔记本电脑将其竞争对手甩在身后。大容量电池（75Wh）在这里使自己受到关注。使用 "节省电池 "的性能配置，运行时间略有增加--大约30分钟。

该电池的容量为75Wh。
该电池的容量为75Wh。
Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
19h 23min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 92)
9h 03min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10h 25min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 24min
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
i5-11300H, GeForce MX450, 75 Wh		HP Pavilion 15-eg
i7-1165G7, GeForce MX450, 41 Wh		Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
i7-11370H, GeForce MX450, 70 Wh		Huawei MateBook D 16-53011VFJ
R5 4600H, Vega 6, 56 Wh		Average of class Multimedia
 
Battery Runtime
-21%
-30%
-19%
16%
Reader / Idle
1163
901
-23%
650
-44%
710
-39%
1168 ?(612 - 2760, n=17, last 2 years)
0%
H.264
625
323
-48%
510
-18%
821 ?(319 - 1481, n=52, last 2 years)
31%
WiFi v1.3
543
396
-27%
493
-9%
538
-1%
625 ?(279 - 1204, n=85, last 2 years)
15%
Load
84
74
-12%
70
-17%
68
-19%
97.8 ?(39 - 212, n=64, last 2 years)
16%
Witcher 3 ultra
59
76.3 ?(57 - 96, n=4, last 2 years)

Pros

+ 哑光IPS显示屏
+ 120赫兹的16:10格式显示
+ 高分辨率（2560x1600像素
+ 良好的色彩空间覆盖
+ 良好的性能发展
+ 圆滑的铝制外壳
+ NVMe SSD
+ 运行安静
+ 雷电4/USB4
+ 通过USB-C的显示端口
+ 电源交付
+ 良好的电池寿命
+ 快速存储卡读卡器

Cons

- 焊接的RAM
- 没有内存插槽
- 在满负荷的情况下会变得非常热

结论 - 成功的全能型选手

联想IdeaPad Pro 5 16IHU6（82L9000WGE），由。
联想IdeaPad Pro 5 16IHU6（82L9000WGE），由。

办公和互联网应用以及游戏对IdeaPad 5 Pro不构成任何重大挑战。Core i5-11300H处理器和GeForce MX450GPU可以持续发挥高水平。这里安装的MX450 GPU提供了迄今为止我们用这种GPU测得的最佳基准测试结果。

联想在IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6上做了很多正确的事情。这款16英寸的全能型产品可能会吸引很多人的兴趣。

在整个负载范围内，噪音发展是温和的。在日常使用中，该设备通常几乎不会发出任何噪音，而且几乎不会发热。然而，在硬件满负荷的情况下，该设备会大幅发热。

强大的硬件并不妨碍良好的电池寿命。由于真实世界的电池运行时间为9至10小时，你应该能够在没有附带的USB-C电源适配器（95瓦）的情况下度过一天。电源适配器可以插入两个USB-C端口（1个Thunderbolt 4/USB 4，1个USB 2.0）。内置键盘（背光）总体上留下了良好的印象。

16:10格式的16英寸显示屏（2560x1600像素，120赫兹，IPS）因其哑光表面、稳定的视角、良好的色彩还原和良好的色域覆盖而得分。亮度和对比度符合各自的目标。

所列的竞争对手会是一个替代品吗？这款华为MateBook D 16提供稍多的CPU功率，价格比IdeaPad低约100欧元（约117美元）至150欧元（约175美元）。RedmiBook Pro 15与IdeaPad最为相似，但它只能在显示分辨率（3000x2000像素）方面超过该笔记本电脑。此外，小米设备需要从中国在线平台购买。惠普Pavilion 15在性能方面明显落后于联想笔记本电脑，但它在可扩展和可更换的内存方面获得了分数。

Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 - 08/15/2021 v7 (old)
Sascha Mölck

Chassis
82 / 98 → 84%
Keyboard
83%
Pointing Device
87%
Connectivity
63 / 80 → 79%
Weight
64 / 20-72 → 85%
Battery
86 / 95 → 90%
Display
90%
Games Performance
77 / 90 → 86%
Application Performance
90 / 90 → 100%
Temperature
81%
Noise
91 / 95 → 96%
Audio
59%
Camera
44 / 85 → 51%
Average
77%
86%
Multimedia - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6的回顾。16英寸全能型产品，电池寿命良好
Sascha Mölck, 2021-08-22 (Update: 2021-08-22)