联想 IdeaPad Y900 17ISK 笔记本电脑简短评测

Name: Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
Brand: Lenovo

扎了针的Y700。 定位更加高端的Y900系列相比前代机型Y700提供了更多功能和更好的工艺品质。遗憾的是，它的孤岛式机械键盘，吵闹的风扇和高售价让我们有些难以满意。

Allen Ngo (translated by Yuchen Wang), Published 09/21/2016 🇺🇸 🇮🇹 ...

Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Skylake Windows

Test device courtesy of Lenovo US

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 (IdeaPad Y900 Series)

Processor

Intel Core i7-6820HK 4 x 2.7 - 3.6 GHz, Skylake

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M - 8 GB VRAM, Core: 1038 MHz, RAM: 5010 MHz, GDDR5, 372.54

Memory

16 GB

, DDR4, PC4-17000, 1300 MHz, 15-15-15-36, 双通道

Display

17.30 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, 型号: LG 飞利浦 LP173WF4-SPF1, ID: LGD0469, glossy: yes

Mainboard

Intel CM236 (Skylake PCH-H)

Storage

Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2, 256 GB

, 第二块硬盘: 1 TB 西部数据 WDC WD10SPCX-24HWST1

Soundcard

Nvidia GM204 - High Definition Audio Controller

Connections

1 USB 2.0, 4 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米耳机接口，3.5毫米麦克风接口, Card Reader: SD读卡器

Networking

Qualcomm/Atheros e2400 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.0

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 36 x 427 x 318

Battery

90 Wh Lithium-Ion

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 720p

Additional features

Speakers: 立体声+低音炮, Keyboard: 孤岛式机械键盘, Keyboard Light: yes, Lenovo Nerve Center, Magic Y Key, Training Manual Software, Lenovo Solution Center, Dolby Audio, 12 Months Warranty

Weight

4.4 kg, Power Supply: 965 g

Price

2400 USD

Links

Lenovo homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Asus G752VS-XB78K MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG Lenovo Ideapad Y700-17 80QK7709PB EVGA SC17 DIN A4 ❌

Right: Novo Recovery button, SD reader, 3.5 mm microphone, 3.5 mm headset, 2x USB 2.0, Kensington Lock

Left: AC adapter, DisplayPort ???, HDMI 2.0, Gigabit Ethernet, USB Type-C w/ Thunderbolt 3, 2x USB 3.0

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US	135.3 MB/s +80%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900	75.3 MB/s
MSI GS73VR 6RF	23.8 MB/s -68%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US	186.3 MB/s +99%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900	93.8 MB/s
MSI GS73VR 6RF	27.6 MB/s -71%

Networking
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 512KB
MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174	544 MBit/s +2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	532 MBit/s
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m 512KB
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	518 MBit/s
MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174	467.9 MBit/s -10%


334.3 cd/m²	346 cd/m²	342.1 cd/m²
338.3 cd/m²	344.9 cd/m²	326.4 cd/m²
315 cd/m²	315.7 cd/m²	298.7 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2

Maximum: 346 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 329 cd/m² Minimum: 2.69 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 344.9 cd/m²
Contrast: 988:1 (Black: 0.349 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.49 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 4.63 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
86.4% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
56.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
63.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
86.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
67.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.11

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2)

	Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 17.3", 1920x1080	Lenovo Ideapad Y700 17ISK 80Q0 IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080	MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US LG Philips LGD046E, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080	Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0 (AUO109B), IPS, 17.3", 3840x2160	EVGA SC17 IPS, 17.3", 3840x2160	Asus G752VS-XB78K LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF3 (LGD04E8), IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080
Display		-1%	0%	34%	34%	-1%
Display P3 Coverage	67.4	67.4 0%	68.3 1%	86.9 29%	87.6 30%	66.9 -1%
sRGB Coverage	86.3	84.8 -2%	86.7 0%	100 16%	100 16%	85.2 -1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	63.2	62 -2%	63.4 0%	99.4 57%	99 57%	62.3 -1%
Response Times		-41%	2%	0%	-78%	3%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	34.8 ?(14, 20.8)	51.6 ?(20, 31.6) -48%	34.4 ?(15.6, 18.8) 1%	37 ?(13, 24) -6%	69.6 ?(28.4, 41.2) -100%	38 ?(14, 24) -9%
Response Time Black / White *	25.6 ?(4.8, 20.8)	34.4 ?(5.2, 29.2) -34%	25.2 ?(4.8, 20.4) 2%	24 ?(5, 19) 6%	40 ?(10, 30) -56%	22 ?(4, 18) 14%
PWM Frequency					1000 ?(29)
Screen		7%	8%	18%	4%	7%
Brightness middle	344.9	349.7 1%	348.7 1%	336 -3%	394.1 14%	328 -5%
Brightness	329	332 1%	327 -1%	320 -3%	368 12%	317 -4%
Brightness Distribution	86	90 5%	89 3%	88 2%	83 -3%	88 2%
Black Level *	0.349	0.304 13%	0.323 7%	0.25 28%	0.439 -26%	0.3 14%
Contrast	988	1150 16%	1080 9%	1344 36%	898 -9%	1093 11%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.49	3.99 11%	4.09 9%	3.61 20%	5.79 -29%	3.74 17%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	8.72	8.74 -0%	9.02 -3%	6.02 31%	8.44 3%	8.97 -3%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	4.63	3.34 28%	2.14 54%	4.78 -3%	4.23 9%	2.67 42%
Gamma	2.11 ^104%	2.23 ^99%	2.25 ^98%	2.32 ^95%	2.11 ^104%	2.41 ^91%
CCT	6905 ^94%	6111 ^106%	6885 ^94%	6185 ^105%	7479 ^87%	6861 ^95%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	56.7	55.8 -2%	56.9 0%	88 55%	86.6 53%	56 -1%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	86.4	84.8 -2%	86.5 0%	100 16%	100 16%	85 -2%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-12% / -1%	3% / 6%	17% / 19%	-13% / -1%	3% / 5%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
25.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 4.8 ms rise
25.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 20.8 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
34.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 14 ms rise
34.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 20.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5 | Cinebench R10 | wPrime 2.10 | Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS Intel Core i7-6700K	166 Points +9%
MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451 Intel Core i7-6820HK	158 Points +4%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 Intel Core i7-6820HK	152 Points
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD Intel Core i7-5700HQ	143 Points -6%
Asus G750JS-T4064H Intel Core i7-4700HQ	131 Points -14%
CPU Multi 64Bit
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS Intel Core i7-6700K	865 Points +22%
MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451 Intel Core i7-6820HK	860 Points +22%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 Intel Core i7-6820HK	707 Points
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD Intel Core i7-5700HQ	682 Points -4%
Asus G750JS-T4064H Intel Core i7-4700HQ	641 Points -9%

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS Intel Core i7-6700K	1.91 Points +14%
MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451 Intel Core i7-6820HK	1.78 Points +7%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 Intel Core i7-6820HK	1.67 Points
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD Intel Core i7-5700HQ	1.66 Points -1%
Asus G750JS-T4064H Intel Core i7-4700HQ	1.49 Points -11%
Asus G750JS-T4064H Intel Core i7-4700HQ	1.49 Points -11%
CPU Multi 64Bit
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS Intel Core i7-6700K	9.56 Points +24%
MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451 Intel Core i7-6820HK	9.53 Points +23%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 Intel Core i7-6820HK	7.73 Points
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD Intel Core i7-5700HQ	7.53 Points -3%
Asus G750JS-T4064H Intel Core i7-4700HQ	6.94 Points -10%
Asus G750JS-T4064H Intel Core i7-4700HQ	6.94 Points -10%

Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS Intel Core i7-6700K	26150 Points +25%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 Intel Core i7-6820HK	20910 Points
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD Intel Core i7-5700HQ	18785 Points -10%
Rendering Single 32Bit
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS Intel Core i7-6700K	6487 Points +17%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 Intel Core i7-6820HK	5559 Points
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD Intel Core i7-5700HQ	5449 Points -2%

wPrime 2.10 - 1024m
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 Intel Core i7-6820HK	229.2 s *
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD Intel Core i7-5700HQ	210.1 s * +8%
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS Intel Core i7-6700K	178.5 s * +22%

Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - 32M
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD Intel Core i7-5700HQ	562 s * -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 Intel Core i7-6820HK	556 s *
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS Intel Core i7-6700K	498.3 s * +10%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

10260

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

20910

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

5559

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

7.73 Points

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

71.3 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

1.67 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

152 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

109.6 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

707 Points

Help

... in comparison

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	4952 Points
MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1122	4620 Points -7%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7	4060 Points -18%
Lenovo Ideapad Y700 17ISK 80Q0 GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2	3848 Points -22%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	5533 Points
MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1122	5095 Points -8%
Lenovo Ideapad Y700 17ISK 80Q0 GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2	5044 Points -9%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1122	7636 Points +16%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	6609 Points
Lenovo Ideapad Y700 17ISK 80Q0 GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2	4762 Points -28%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7	2303 Points -65%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		4952 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		6609 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		5533 points
Help

	Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	Lenovo Ideapad Y700 17ISK 80Q0 Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2	MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1122	EVGA SC17 Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe	Asus G752VS-XB78K Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		-55%	-58%	21%	23%
Read Seq	1559	513 -67%	529 -66%	2247 44%	1718 10%
Write Seq	1254	156.3 -88%	338.5 -73%	1534 22%	1305 4%
Read 512	850	435.6 -49%	288.9 -66%	1113 31%	1250 47%
Write 512	1228	156.5 -87%	319.2 -74%	1490 21%	1438 17%
Read 4k	49.32	36.89 -25%	23.1 -53%	52.1 6%	44.42 -10%
Write 4k	140.3	96.9 -31%	99.4 -29%	149.2 6%	154.4 10%
Read 4k QD32	539	358.8 -33%	147.5 -73%	635 18%	744 38%
Write 4k QD32	345.3	138.9 -60%	236.9 -31%	422 22%	578 67%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

AS SSD

Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2

Sequential Read: 1559 MB/s

Sequential Write: 1254 MB/s

512K Read: 850 MB/s

512K Write: 1228 MB/s

4K Read: 49.32 MB/s

4K Write: 140.3 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 539 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 345.3 MB/s

3DMark | 3DMark 11

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus G701VO-CS74K NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK	13018 Points +32%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	11957 Points +21%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK	9888 Points
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ	9608 Points -3%
Lenovo Ideapad Y700 17ISK 80Q0 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ	4318 Points -56%
3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra Graphics
Asus G701VO-CS74K NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK	3009 Points +29%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	2592 Points +11%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK	2326 Points
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ	2299 Points -1%
Lenovo Ideapad Y700 17ISK 80Q0 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ	974 Points -58%
Fire Strike Extreme Graphics
Asus G701VO-CS74K NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK	6123 Points +32%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	5541 Points +19%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK	4650 Points
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ	4623 Points -1%
Lenovo Ideapad Y700 17ISK 80Q0 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ	2012 Points -57%

3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus G701VO-CS74K NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK	16946 Points +29%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK	13168 Points
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	12731 Points -3%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ	12472 Points -5%
Lenovo Ideapad Y700 17ISK 80Q0 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ	5237 Points -60%
1280x720 Performance Combined
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK	9842 Points
Asus G701VO-CS74K NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK	9017 Points -8%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ	8343 Points -15%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	8338 Points -15%
Lenovo Ideapad Y700 17ISK 80Q0 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ	5474 Points -44%

3DMark 11 Performance		12267 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		134877 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		26493 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		8653 points
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score		4478 points
Help

... in comparison

Sleeping Dogs - 1920x1080 Extreme Preset AA:Extreme
Asus G701VO-CS74K GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)	75.2 fps +29%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	58.1 fps
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	57.5 fps -1%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128	44.9 fps -23%

Guild Wars 2 - 1920x1080 All Maximum / On AA:FX
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	58.2 fps
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	52.9 fps -9%

BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Asus G701VO-CS74K GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)	106.2 fps +18%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	105.5 fps +17%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	90.2 fps
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	86.4 fps -4%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128	69.5 fps -23%

Metro: Last Light - 1920x1080 Very High (DX11) AF:16x
Asus G701VO-CS74K GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)	88.3 fps +32%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	82.1 fps +23%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	66.8 fps
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128	50.5 fps -24%

Thief - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FXAA & High SS AF:8x
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	72.4 fps +17%
Asus G701VO-CS74K GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)	67.9 fps +9%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	62.1 fps
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	58.6 fps -6%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128	47.5 fps -24%

Batman: Arkham Knight - 1920x1080 High / On AA:SM AF:16x
Asus G701VO-CS74K GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)	63 fps +24%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	62 fps +22%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	51 fps
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128	36 fps -29%

Metal Gear Solid V - 1920x1080 Extra High / On
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	60 fps
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128	60 fps 0%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	60 fps 0%
Asus G701VO-CS74K GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)	60 fps 0%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	60 fps 0%

Fallout 4 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T AF:16x
Asus G701VO-CS74K GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)	79.3 fps +38%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	71.6 fps +25%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	57.9 fps +1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	57.4 fps
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128	43.5 fps -24%

Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	63.5 fps +25%
Asus G701VO-CS74K GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)	60.4 fps +19%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	55 fps +9%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	50.6 fps
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128	42.8 fps -15%

Doom - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:SM
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	96.5 fps +17%
Asus G701VO-CS74K GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)	84.3 fps +2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	82.3 fps
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	56 fps -32%

Overwatch - 1920x1080 Epic (Render Scale 100 %) AA:SM AF:16x
Asus G701VO-CS74K GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)	118.2 fps +38%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	106.3 fps +24%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	87.3 fps +2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	85.7 fps

	low	med.	high	ultra
Sleeping Dogs (2012)				58.1
Guild Wars 2 (2012)				58.2
BioShock Infinite (2013)				90.2
Metro: Last Light (2013)				66.8
Thief (2014)				62.1
Batman: Arkham Knight (2015)				51
Metal Gear Solid V (2015)				60
Fallout 4 (2015)				57.4
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)				50.6
Doom (2016)				82.3
Overwatch (2016)				85.7

Noise Level

Idle		29.4 / 32.4 / 48 dB(A)
Load		42.5 / 48.5 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: BK Precision 732A (15 cm distance) environment noise: 28.8 dB(A)

	Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	Lenovo Ideapad Y700 17ISK 80Q0 GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2	MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1122	Asus G752VS-XB78K GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
Noise		10%	4%	5%	-3%
off / environment *	28.8		28.9 -0%	30 -4%	31 -8%
Idle Minimum *	29.4	28 5%	32.4 -10%	31 -5%	33 -12%
Idle Average *	32.4	28.1 13%	32.4 -0%	32 1%	34 -5%
Idle Maximum *	48	31.5 34%	32.4 32%	33 31%	40 17%
Load Average *	42.5	40.6 4%	39.4 7%	40 6%	44 -4%
Load Maximum *	48.5	51 -5%	52 -7%	47 3%	50 -3%

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load

Idle


37.6 °C	49 °C	36.8 °C
32.8 °C	40 °C	36.2 °C
24.4 °C	23.8 °C	28.8 °C

Maximum: 49 °C
Average: 34.4 °C


38.6 °C	39.2 °C	38.8 °C
32.2 °C	36.4 °C	32.4 °C
30.2 °C	30 °C	31.2 °C

Maximum: 39.2 °C
Average: 34.3 °C

Power Supply (max.) 41.4 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.4 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.2 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.8 °C / 83.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+0.1 °C / 0.2 F).

Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 87.1% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 87.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 87.1% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (132% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 100% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 100% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.35 / 0.88 Watt
Idle	24.3 / 29.6 / 29.9 Watt
Load	110.1 / 171.4 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 6820HK, GeForce GTX 980M, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2, , 1920x1080, 17.3"	Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 980M, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3"	MSI GS73VR 6RF 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122, TN LED, 1920x1080, 17.3"	HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 960M, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"
Power Consumption		9%	-20%	-3%	54%
Idle Minimum *	24.3	20.6 15%	25 -3%	22.6 7%	5.3 78%
Idle Average *	29.6	22.1 25%	35 -18%	32.7 -10%	10.6 64%
Idle Maximum *	29.9	22.5 25%	46 -54%	32.8 -10%	11.8 61%
Load Average *	110.1	130.6 -19%	103 6%	114.7 -4%	70.9 36%
Load Maximum *	171.4	177.2 -3%	223 -30%	167.9 2%	119.8 30%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		5h 49min
WiFi Websurfing		4h 08min
Load (maximum brightness)		2h 16min

	Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 6820HK, GeForce GTX 980M, 90 Wh	Lenovo Ideapad Y700 17ISK 80Q0 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 960M, 60 Wh	Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 980M, 64 Wh	Asus G752VS-XB78K 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 90 Wh	MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 83 Wh
Battery Runtime		33%	-30%	-21%	-17%
Reader / Idle	349	688 97%	273 -22%	311 -11%	323 -7%
WiFi v1.3	248	334 35%	187 -25%	210 -15%	221 -11%
Load	136	91 -33%	76 -44%	84 -38%	93 -32%

Pros

+ 表面温度和核心温度相对较低

+ 大尺寸键盘按键，独立可编程按键

+ 支持RAID 0，三个硬盘槽

+ 独特的设计，高品质机身

+ 键盘背光功能丰富

+ USB-C型接口支持Thunderbolt 3

+ 声音响亮的扬声器

+ 可更换机械按键

+ 无处理器和显卡降频

+ 支持G-Sync

Cons

- 加速模式让人失望，极端负载下处理器温度高

- 键盘不支持独立RGB背光

- 风扇在低负载下有脉冲式噪音

- 音响效果不够均衡

- 不支持120赫兹/5毫秒或4K屏幕选项

- 游戏时风扇较吵

- 不支持自定义风扇控制

- 无法升级显卡

- 难以维护升级

- 一般的电池续航

- 按键反馈较软

- 售价高

In review: Lenovo Ideapad Y900-17ISK. Test model provided by Lenovo US.

联想最新的Y900挂着的2000美元（约13337人民币）价签说明它走上了完全不同的路线。尽管它的设计和工艺都不错，但新的机械键盘和加速模式则给了我们很复杂的感受。它的键盘按键较软，也不够均匀，一些用户可能不会喜欢它独特的反馈。同时，加速模式在游戏中可以提供不多的一点优势，我们建议在游戏中保持开启，因为关上它并没有什么其他好处。

这个系统的另外一个缺点是风扇的奇怪脉冲行为，同时在我们测试时它没有手动控制功能。虽然可能这一点会通过更新得到改进，但用户不得不避免在安静的公共场所使用它，即使是开启节能模式。它的风扇噪音相比除了微星GS73VR和技嘉同类机型外的大部分其他17寸笔记本电脑都更吵。

Y900的优势是它强大的性能，无处理器或显卡降频，和较低的机身温度。不过我们在考虑它是否值得推荐时犹豫再三，因为它相比更便宜的一些机型的优势并不明显，如易于维护升级、搭配MXM 3.0b显卡插槽的GT72VR。

联想的最新旗舰游戏本在品质和设计上是一次重要的改进，不过它受到吵闹的风扇、缺少屏幕升级选项、较软的孤岛式机械键盘和较低的性价比的拖累，特别是现在的竞争机型都搭配了更高效的GTX 1060显卡。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 - 2016-10-10 10/10/2016 v5.1 ^(old)
Allen Ngo

Chassis

82 / 98 → 83%

Keyboard

73%

Pointing Device

75%

Connectivity

64 / 81 → 79%

Weight

45 / 10-66 → 63%

Battery

76%

Display

83%

Games Performance

92%

Application Performance

96%

Temperature

90 / 95 → 95%

Noise

60 / 90 → 67%

Audio

70%

Camera

50 / 85 → 59%

Average

74%

81%

Gaming - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Allen Ngo - Lead Editor U.S. - 5238 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2011

contact me via: @AllenNgoNBC

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 联想 IdeaPad Y900 17ISK 笔记本电脑简短评测

Allen Ngo, 2016-09-21 (Update: 2020-06- 8)