Notebookcheck Logo

联想 IdeaPad Y900 17ISK 笔记本电脑简短评测

扎了针的Y700。 定位更加高端的Y900系列相比前代机型Y700提供了更多功能和更好的工艺品质。遗憾的是，它的孤岛式机械键盘，吵闹的风扇和高售价让我们有些难以满意。
Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Skylake Windows
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 (IdeaPad Y900 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i7-6820HK 4 x 2.7 - 3.6 GHz, Skylake
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M - 8 GB VRAM, Core: 1038 MHz, RAM: 5010 MHz, GDDR5, 372.54
Memory
16 GB 
, DDR4, PC4-17000, 1300 MHz, 15-15-15-36, 双通道
Display
17.30 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, 型号: LG 飞利浦 LP173WF4-SPF1, ID: LGD0469, glossy: yes
Mainboard
Intel CM236 (Skylake PCH-H)
Storage
Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2, 256 GB 
, 第二块硬盘: 1 TB 西部数据 WDC WD10SPCX-24HWST1
Soundcard
Nvidia GM204 - High Definition Audio Controller
Connections
1 USB 2.0, 4 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米耳机接口，3.5毫米麦克风接口, Card Reader: SD读卡器
Networking
Qualcomm/Atheros e2400 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.0
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 36 x 427 x 318
Battery
90 Wh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Additional features
Speakers: 立体声+低音炮, Keyboard: 孤岛式机械键盘, Keyboard Light: yes, Lenovo Nerve Center, Magic Y Key, Training Manual Software, Lenovo Solution Center, Dolby Audio, 12 Months Warranty
Weight
4.4 kg, Power Supply: 965 g
Price
2400 USD
Links
Lenovo homepage
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

❌
428 mm 333 mm 51 mm 4.5 kg428 mm 294 mm 48 mm 3.9 kg427 mm 318 mm 36 mm 4.4 kg423 mm 322 mm 40 mm 4.2 kg423 mm 305 mm 28 mm 3.6 kg408 mm 295.5 mm 26.6 mm 4 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Front: No connectivity
Front: No connectivity
Right: Novo Recovery button, SD reader, 3.5 mm microphone, 3.5 mm headset, 2x USB 2.0, Kensington Lock
Right: Novo Recovery button, SD reader, 3.5 mm microphone, 3.5 mm headset, 2x USB 2.0, Kensington Lock
Left: AC adapter, DisplayPort ???, HDMI 2.0, Gigabit Ethernet, USB Type-C w/ Thunderbolt 3, 2x USB 3.0
Left: AC adapter, DisplayPort ???, HDMI 2.0, Gigabit Ethernet, USB Type-C w/ Thunderbolt 3, 2x USB 3.0
Rear: No connectivity
Rear: No connectivity
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US
 
135.3 MB/s +80%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
 
75.3 MB/s
MSI GS73VR 6RF
 
23.8 MB/s -68%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US
 
186.3 MB/s +99%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
 
93.8 MB/s
MSI GS73VR 6RF
 
27.6 MB/s -71%
Networking
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 512KB
MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174
544 MBit/s +2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
532 MBit/s
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m 512KB
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
518 MBit/s
MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174
467.9 MBit/s -10%
334.3
cd/m²		346
cd/m²		342.1
cd/m²
338.3
cd/m²		344.9
cd/m²		326.4
cd/m²
315
cd/m²		315.7
cd/m²		298.7
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2
Maximum: 346 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 329 cd/m² Minimum: 2.69 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 344.9 cd/m²
Contrast: 988:1 (Black: 0.349 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.49 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 4.63 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
86.4% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
56.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
63.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
86.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
67.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.11
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
17.3", 1920x1080		Lenovo Ideapad Y700 17ISK 80Q0
IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080		MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US
LG Philips LGD046E, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080		Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0 (AUO109B), IPS, 17.3", 3840x2160		EVGA SC17
IPS, 17.3", 3840x2160		Asus G752VS-XB78K
LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF3 (LGD04E8), IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080
Display
-1%
0%
34%
34%
-1%
Display P3 Coverage
67.4
67.4
0%
68.3
1%
86.9
29%
87.6
30%
66.9
-1%
sRGB Coverage
86.3
84.8
-2%
86.7
0%
100
16%
100
16%
85.2
-1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
63.2
62
-2%
63.4
0%
99.4
57%
99
57%
62.3
-1%
Response Times
-41%
2%
0%
-78%
3%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
34.8 ?(14, 20.8)
51.6 ?(20, 31.6)
-48%
34.4 ?(15.6, 18.8)
1%
37 ?(13, 24)
-6%
69.6 ?(28.4, 41.2)
-100%
38 ?(14, 24)
-9%
Response Time Black / White *
25.6 ?(4.8, 20.8)
34.4 ?(5.2, 29.2)
-34%
25.2 ?(4.8, 20.4)
2%
24 ?(5, 19)
6%
40 ?(10, 30)
-56%
22 ?(4, 18)
14%
PWM Frequency
1000 ?(29)
Screen
7%
8%
18%
4%
7%
Brightness middle
344.9
349.7
1%
348.7
1%
336
-3%
394.1
14%
328
-5%
Brightness
329
332
1%
327
-1%
320
-3%
368
12%
317
-4%
Brightness Distribution
86
90
5%
89
3%
88
2%
83
-3%
88
2%
Black Level *
0.349
0.304
13%
0.323
7%
0.25
28%
0.439
-26%
0.3
14%
Contrast
988
1150
16%
1080
9%
1344
36%
898
-9%
1093
11%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.49
3.99
11%
4.09
9%
3.61
20%
5.79
-29%
3.74
17%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
8.72
8.74
-0%
9.02
-3%
6.02
31%
8.44
3%
8.97
-3%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.63
3.34
28%
2.14
54%
4.78
-3%
4.23
9%
2.67
42%
Gamma
2.11 104%
2.23 99%
2.25 98%
2.32 95%
2.11 104%
2.41 91%
CCT
6905 94%
6111 106%
6885 94%
6185 105%
7479 87%
6861 95%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
56.7
55.8
-2%
56.9
0%
88
55%
86.6
53%
56
-1%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
86.4
84.8
-2%
86.5
0%
100
16%
100
16%
85
-2%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-12% / -1%
3% / 6%
17% / 19%
-13% / -1%
3% / 5%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
25.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4.8 ms rise
↘ 20.8 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 58 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
34.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14 ms rise
↘ 20.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5 | Cinebench R10 | wPrime 2.10 | Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS
Intel Core i7-6700K
166 Points +9%
MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451
Intel Core i7-6820HK
158 Points +4%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
Intel Core i7-6820HK
152 Points
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
143 Points -6%
Asus G750JS-T4064H
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
131 Points -14%
CPU Multi 64Bit
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS
Intel Core i7-6700K
865 Points +22%
MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451
Intel Core i7-6820HK
860 Points +22%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
Intel Core i7-6820HK
707 Points
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
682 Points -4%
Asus G750JS-T4064H
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
641 Points -9%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS
Intel Core i7-6700K
1.91 Points +14%
MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451
Intel Core i7-6820HK
1.78 Points +7%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
Intel Core i7-6820HK
1.67 Points
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
1.66 Points -1%
Asus G750JS-T4064H
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
1.49 Points -11%
Asus G750JS-T4064H
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
1.49 Points -11%
CPU Multi 64Bit
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS
Intel Core i7-6700K
9.56 Points +24%
MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451
Intel Core i7-6820HK
9.53 Points +23%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
Intel Core i7-6820HK
7.73 Points
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
7.53 Points -3%
Asus G750JS-T4064H
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
6.94 Points -10%
Asus G750JS-T4064H
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
6.94 Points -10%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS
Intel Core i7-6700K
26150 Points +25%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
Intel Core i7-6820HK
20910 Points
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
18785 Points -10%
Rendering Single 32Bit
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS
Intel Core i7-6700K
6487 Points +17%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
Intel Core i7-6820HK
5559 Points
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
5449 Points -2%
wPrime 2.10 - 1024m
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
Intel Core i7-6820HK
229.2 s *
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
210.1 s * +8%
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS
Intel Core i7-6700K
178.5 s * +22%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - 32M
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
562 s * -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
Intel Core i7-6820HK
556 s *
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS
Intel Core i7-6700K
498.3 s * +10%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
10260
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
20910
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
5559
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
7.73 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
71.3 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.67 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
152 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
109.6 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
707 Points
Help
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
4952 Points
MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1122
4620 Points -7%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
4060 Points -18%
Lenovo Ideapad Y700 17ISK 80Q0
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2
3848 Points -22%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
5533 Points
MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1122
5095 Points -8%
Lenovo Ideapad Y700 17ISK 80Q0
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2
5044 Points -9%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1122
7636 Points +16%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
6609 Points
Lenovo Ideapad Y700 17ISK 80Q0
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2
4762 Points -28%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
2303 Points -65%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4952 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
6609 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5533 points
Help
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2		Lenovo Ideapad Y700 17ISK 80Q0
Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2		MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US
SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1122		EVGA SC17
Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe		Asus G752VS-XB78K
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-55%
-58%
21%
23%
Read Seq
1559
513
-67%
529
-66%
2247
44%
1718
10%
Write Seq
1254
156.3
-88%
338.5
-73%
1534
22%
1305
4%
Read 512
850
435.6
-49%
288.9
-66%
1113
31%
1250
47%
Write 512
1228
156.5
-87%
319.2
-74%
1490
21%
1438
17%
Read 4k
49.32
36.89
-25%
23.1
-53%
52.1
6%
44.42
-10%
Write 4k
140.3
96.9
-31%
99.4
-29%
149.2
6%
154.4
10%
Read 4k QD32
539
358.8
-33%
147.5
-73%
635
18%
744
38%
Write 4k QD32
345.3
138.9
-60%
236.9
-31%
422
22%
578
67%
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
AS SSD
hddimg
Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
Sequential Read: 1559 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1254 MB/s
512K Read: 850 MB/s
512K Write: 1228 MB/s
4K Read: 49.32 MB/s
4K Write: 140.3 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 539 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 345.3 MB/s
3DMark | 3DMark 11
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus G701VO-CS74K
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK
13018 Points +32%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
11957 Points +21%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK
9888 Points
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ
9608 Points -3%
Lenovo Ideapad Y700 17ISK 80Q0
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ
4318 Points -56%
3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra Graphics
Asus G701VO-CS74K
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK
3009 Points +29%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
2592 Points +11%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK
2326 Points
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ
2299 Points -1%
Lenovo Ideapad Y700 17ISK 80Q0
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ
974 Points -58%
Fire Strike Extreme Graphics
Asus G701VO-CS74K
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK
6123 Points +32%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
5541 Points +19%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK
4650 Points
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ
4623 Points -1%
Lenovo Ideapad Y700 17ISK 80Q0
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ
2012 Points -57%
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus G701VO-CS74K
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK
16946 Points +29%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK
13168 Points
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
12731 Points -3%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ
12472 Points -5%
Lenovo Ideapad Y700 17ISK 80Q0
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ
5237 Points -60%
1280x720 Performance Combined
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK
9842 Points
Asus G701VO-CS74K
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK
9017 Points -8%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ
8343 Points -15%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
8338 Points -15%
Lenovo Ideapad Y700 17ISK 80Q0
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ
5474 Points -44%
3DMark 11 Performance
12267 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
134877 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
26493 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
8653 points
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
4478 points
Help
Sleeping Dogs | Guild Wars 2 | BioShock Infinite | Metro: Last Light | Thief | Batman: Arkham Knight | Metal Gear Solid V | Fallout 4 | Rise of the Tomb Raider | Doom | Overwatch
Sleeping Dogs - 1920x1080 Extreme Preset AA:Extreme
Asus G701VO-CS74K
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)
75.2 fps +29%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
58.1 fps
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
57.5 fps -1%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128
44.9 fps -23%
Guild Wars 2 - 1920x1080 All Maximum / On AA:FX
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
58.2 fps
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
52.9 fps -9%
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Asus G701VO-CS74K
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)
106.2 fps +18%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
105.5 fps +17%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
90.2 fps
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
86.4 fps -4%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128
69.5 fps -23%
Metro: Last Light - 1920x1080 Very High (DX11) AF:16x
Asus G701VO-CS74K
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)
88.3 fps +32%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
82.1 fps +23%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
66.8 fps
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128
50.5 fps -24%
Thief - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FXAA & High SS AF:8x
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
72.4 fps +17%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)
67.9 fps +9%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
62.1 fps
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
58.6 fps -6%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128
47.5 fps -24%
Batman: Arkham Knight - 1920x1080 High / On AA:SM AF:16x
Asus G701VO-CS74K
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)
63 fps +24%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
62 fps +22%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
51 fps
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128
36 fps -29%
Metal Gear Solid V - 1920x1080 Extra High / On
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
60 fps
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128
60 fps 0%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
60 fps 0%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)
60 fps 0%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
60 fps 0%
Fallout 4 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T AF:16x
Asus G701VO-CS74K
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)
79.3 fps +38%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
71.6 fps +25%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
57.9 fps +1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
57.4 fps
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128
43.5 fps -24%
Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
63.5 fps +25%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)
60.4 fps +19%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
55 fps +9%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
50.6 fps
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128
42.8 fps -15%
Doom - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:SM
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
96.5 fps +17%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)
84.3 fps +2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
82.3 fps
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
56 fps -32%
Overwatch - 1920x1080 Epic (Render Scale 100 %) AA:SM AF:16x
Asus G701VO-CS74K
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)
118.2 fps +38%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
106.3 fps +24%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
87.3 fps +2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
85.7 fps
lowmed.highultra
Sleeping Dogs (2012) 58.1
Guild Wars 2 (2012) 58.2
BioShock Infinite (2013) 90.2
Metro: Last Light (2013) 66.8
Thief (2014) 62.1
Batman: Arkham Knight (2015) 51
Metal Gear Solid V (2015) 60
Fallout 4 (2015) 57.4
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 50.6
Doom (2016) 82.3
Overwatch (2016) 85.7

Noise Level

Idle
29.4 / 32.4 / 48 dB(A)
Load
42.5 / 48.5 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   BK Precision 732A (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 28.8 dB(A)
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2		Lenovo Ideapad Y700 17ISK 80Q0
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2		MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1122		Asus G752VS-XB78K
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7		Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
Noise
10%
4%
5%
-3%
off / environment *
28.8
28.9
-0%
30
-4%
31
-8%
Idle Minimum *
29.4
28
5%
32.4
-10%
31
-5%
33
-12%
Idle Average *
32.4
28.1
13%
32.4
-0%
32
1%
34
-5%
Idle Maximum *
48
31.5
34%
32.4
32%
33
31%
40
17%
Load Average *
42.5
40.6
4%
39.4
7%
40
6%
44
-4%
Load Maximum *
48.5
51
-5%
52
-7%
47
3%
50
-3%

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load
 37.6 °C49 °C36.8 °C 
 32.8 °C40 °C36.2 °C 
 24.4 °C23.8 °C28.8 °C 
Maximum: 49 °C
Average: 34.4 °C
38.6 °C39.2 °C38.8 °C
32.2 °C36.4 °C32.4 °C
30.2 °C30 °C31.2 °C
Maximum: 39.2 °C
Average: 34.3 °C
Power Supply (max.)  41.4 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.4 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.2 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.8 °C / 83.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+0.1 °C / 0.2 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.437.42534.337.73134.136.44035.635.55033.635.56332.435.68033.339.410031.641.112530.2541602963.620028.468.125026.669.131526.86740026.267.45002671.56302581.580024.381100024.27812502477.4160023.577.6200023.372.9250023.572.8315023.272.9400023.270500023.266.9630023.263.3800023.2551000023.354.11250023.348.21600023.444.1SPL03687.1N2.668.1median 23.8median 68.1median 87.1Delta0.87.9035.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.72.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLenovo IdeaPad Y900Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 87.1% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 87.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 87.1% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (132% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 100% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 100% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.35 / 0.88 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 24.3 / 29.6 / 29.9 Watt
Load midlight 110.1 / 171.4 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
6820HK, GeForce GTX 980M, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2, , 1920x1080, 17.3"		Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 980M, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"		Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3"		MSI GS73VR 6RF
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122, TN LED, 1920x1080, 17.3"		HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 960M, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"
Power Consumption
9%
-20%
-3%
54%
Idle Minimum *
24.3
20.6
15%
25
-3%
22.6
7%
5.3
78%
Idle Average *
29.6
22.1
25%
35
-18%
32.7
-10%
10.6
64%
Idle Maximum *
29.9
22.5
25%
46
-54%
32.8
-10%
11.8
61%
Load Average *
110.1
130.6
-19%
103
6%
114.7
-4%
70.9
36%
Load Maximum *
171.4
177.2
-3%
223
-30%
167.9
2%
119.8
30%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
5h 49min
WiFi Websurfing
4h 08min
Load (maximum brightness)
2h 16min
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
6820HK, GeForce GTX 980M, 90 Wh		Lenovo Ideapad Y700 17ISK 80Q0
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 960M, 60 Wh		Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 980M, 64 Wh		Asus G752VS-XB78K
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 90 Wh		MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 83 Wh
Battery Runtime
33%
-30%
-21%
-17%
Reader / Idle
349
688
97%
273
-22%
311
-11%
323
-7%
WiFi v1.3
248
334
35%
187
-25%
210
-15%
221
-11%
Load
136
91
-33%
76
-44%
84
-38%
93
-32%

Pros

+ 表面温度和核心温度相对较低
+ 大尺寸键盘按键，独立可编程按键
+ 支持RAID 0，三个硬盘槽
+ 独特的设计，高品质机身
+ 键盘背光功能丰富
+ USB-C型接口支持Thunderbolt 3
+ 声音响亮的扬声器
+ 可更换机械按键
+ 无处理器和显卡降频
+ 支持G-Sync

Cons

- 加速模式让人失望，极端负载下处理器温度高
- 键盘不支持独立RGB背光
- 风扇在低负载下有脉冲式噪音
- 音响效果不够均衡
- 不支持120赫兹/5毫秒或4K屏幕选项
- 游戏时风扇较吵
- 不支持自定义风扇控制
- 无法升级显卡
- 难以维护升级
- 一般的电池续航
- 按键反馈较软
- 售价高
In review: Lenovo Ideapad Y900-17ISK. Test model provided by Lenovo US.
In review: Lenovo Ideapad Y900-17ISK. Test model provided by Lenovo US.

联想最新的Y900挂着的2000美元（约13337人民币）价签说明它走上了完全不同的路线。尽管它的设计和工艺都不错，但新的机械键盘和加速模式则给了我们很复杂的感受。它的键盘按键较软，也不够均匀，一些用户可能不会喜欢它独特的反馈。同时，加速模式在游戏中可以提供不多的一点优势，我们建议在游戏中保持开启，因为关上它并没有什么其他好处。

这个系统的另外一个缺点是风扇的奇怪脉冲行为，同时在我们测试时它没有手动控制功能。虽然可能这一点会通过更新得到改进，但用户不得不避免在安静的公共场所使用它，即使是开启节能模式。它的风扇噪音相比除了微星GS73VR和技嘉同类机型外的大部分其他17寸笔记本电脑都更吵。

Y900的优势是它强大的性能，无处理器或显卡降频，和较低的机身温度。不过我们在考虑它是否值得推荐时犹豫再三，因为它相比更便宜的一些机型的优势并不明显，如易于维护升级、搭配MXM 3.0b显卡插槽的GT72VR。

联想的最新旗舰游戏本在品质和设计上是一次重要的改进，不过它受到吵闹的风扇、缺少屏幕升级选项、较软的孤岛式机械键盘和较低的性价比的拖累，特别是现在的竞争机型都搭配了更高效的GTX 1060显卡。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。 

Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 - 10/10/2016 v5.1 (old)
Allen Ngo

Chassis
82 / 98 → 83%
Keyboard
73%
Pointing Device
75%
Connectivity
64 / 81 → 79%
Weight
45 / 10-66 → 63%
Battery
76%
Display
83%
Games Performance
92%
Application Performance
96%
Temperature
90 / 95 → 95%
Noise
60 / 90 → 67%
Audio
70%
Camera
50 / 85 → 59%
Average
74%
81%
Gaming - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 联想 IdeaPad Y900 17ISK 笔记本电脑简短评测
Allen Ngo, 2016-09-21 (Update: 2024-11- 4)