Notebookcheck Logo

戴尔Inspiron 13 5310评论。更多的图形,更多的电池寿命

小型冷却系统被过度扩展。

戴尔的13英寸Inspiron 13 5310结合了你心中所想的一切。一个强大的英特尔-H处理器,功率为35瓦,一个专用显卡,一个全高清分辨率的哑光sRGB显示屏,以及两个Thunderbolt 4端口,此外还有一个56瓦时的大电池。这还能出什么问题呢?
Windows Ultrabook Tiger Lake Thunderbolt Laptop / Notebook
一个强大的英特尔-H处理器,功率为35瓦,旁边有一个专用的显卡,你还能有什么愿望呢?
一个强大的英特尔-H处理器,功率为35瓦,旁边有一个专用的显卡,你还能有什么愿望呢?

几个月前,我们刚刚拥有了 Inspiron 13 5301,这是一款13英寸的笔记本电脑,配有15瓦的Tiger Lake SoC和Iris Xe显卡,在我们的测试中。虽然标签几乎没有任何不同,但与我们目前测试的Inspiron 13 5310的实际差异是根本性的:35瓦的处理器,Nvidia MX450显卡,2 x Thunderbolt 4,以及54瓦时而非40瓦时。虽然外壳看起来非常相似,但我们不能真正谈论一个相同的构建,因为双方的连接已经改变。

戴尔的Inspiron 13 5310针对的是那些希望在一台紧凑的移动笔记本电脑中获得尽可能多的性能的移动买家。重量为1.3公斤(约3磅),电池寿命超过10小时,这也是他们在这里得到的东西。此外,还有一个明亮、不反光的显示屏,提供强大的sRGB颜色。有了这一切,它真的只能成为一种推荐,或者说,它可以吗?

虽然具有可比性的13英寸笔记本电脑很少,但有广泛的竞争对手选择。在这方面,这里只有HP Envy 13-ba1475ng。该惠普Pavilion Aero 13be0097nr和华硕ZenBook 13UM325S配备的功能较少,其Vega 8的,因为也是华硕ZenBook 13 UX325EAIris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs.你可以在下面的性能部分找到相应的比较。

Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J (Inspiron 13 5000 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i5-11300H 4 x 3.1 - 4.4 GHz, 28 W PL2 / Short Burst, 15 W PL1 / Sustained, Tiger Lake-H35
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce MX450 - 2048 MB VRAM, Core: 1575 MHz, RAM: 1250 MHz, GDDR6, TU117, 457.71, Optimus with Intel Iris Xe 80EUs
Memory
8 GB 
, LPDDR4X-4266 onboard, no upgrade
Display
13.30 inch 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 170 PPI, AUO B133UAN, IPS, glossy: no, 60 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Tiger Lake-UP3 PCH-LP
Storage
Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe, 512 GB 
, M.2 2280, 335 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Tiger Lake-U/Y PCH-LP - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 20Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: Headset, 1 Fingerprint Reader
Networking
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 15.9 x 296.8 x 210
Battery
54 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 12 Months Warranty
Weight
1.31 kg, Power Supply: 284 g
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible Competitors in Comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
85.7 %
v7 (old)
09 / 2021
Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J
i5-11300H, GeForce MX450
1.3 kg15.9 mm13.30"1920x1200
85.3 %
v7 (old)
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng
i7-1165G7, GeForce MX450
1.3 kg17 mm13.30"1920x1080
84.4 %
v7 (old)
08 / 2021
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr
R7 5800U, Vega 8
953 g17 mm13.30"1920x1200
88.5 %
v7 (old)
06 / 2021
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S
R7 5800U, Vega 8
1.2 kg13.9 mm13.30"1920x1080
88.9 %
v7 (old)
06 / 2021
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1.2 kg13.9 mm13.30"1920x1080
85.7 %
v7 (old)
Acer Spin 3 SP313-51N-56YV
i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
1.4 kg16 mm13.30"2560x1600

案例和设备

2 x Thunderbolt 4 (Type-C),带电源传输和DisplayPort,一个带电源传输
2 x Thunderbolt 4 (Type-C),带电源传输和DisplayPort,一个带电源传输
有限的扩展选择:卸下螺丝,然后从铰链处开始提升
有限的扩展选择:卸下螺丝,然后从铰链处开始提升
内存是焊接的,但M.2 2280 SSD和M.2 2230 Wi-Fi模块可以被替换。
内存是焊接的,但M.2 2280 SSD和M.2 2230 Wi-Fi模块可以被替换。
内存是焊接的,但M.2 2280 SSD和M.2 2230 Wi-Fi模块可以被替换。
内存是焊接的,但M.2 2280 SSD和M.2 2230 Wi-Fi模块可以被替换。

盖子和底座的顶部是由铝制成的,这为13英寸的笔记本电脑提供了高质量的触觉以及一个体面的稳定性。箱子只能有很小的翘曲,铰链也能完成任务。然而,稳定性在键盘下方和掌托的顶部区域达到了极限,那里的表面在哪怕是轻微的压力下都会弯曲,比如当我们在ClickPad的前三分之一处按下时。

易于维护的特点值得称赞。卸下许多螺丝后,只要从铰链处开始,你就可以简单地掀开底板。不幸的是,工作内存是焊接在一起的,所以你在购买设备时就承诺了8GB的容量。你只能更换M.2 2280 SSD和Wi-Fi卡。由于高TDP,双风扇是必要的,除了35瓦的CPU之外,它们还必须冷却Geforce MX450在同一时间。

虽然没有读卡器,但有两个Thunderbolt 4(Type-C)端口,都支持DisplayPort。其中一个还可以处理Power Delivery,这也是用相应的65瓦充电器为笔记本充电的唯一途径。剩下的一个USB Type-A端口被实现为一个折叠式端口,这对视觉效果来说是一个很好的解决方案。

英特尔的Wi-Fi 6 AX201被用作WLAN。在我们与Netgear Nighthawk RAX120参考路由器的测试中,传输速率在良好和略低于平均水平之间。包括蓝牙5.2,但在低功耗方面没有其他可能。

戴尔 Inspiron 13 5310 (2021)
戴尔 Inspiron 13 5310 (2021)
戴尔Inspiron 13 5310(2021)在14英寸笔记本电脑的基础上
戴尔 Inspiron 13 5310 (2021)
戴尔 Inspiron 13 5310 (2021)
戴尔 Inspiron 13 5310 (2021)
戴尔 Inspiron 13 5310 (2021)
戴尔 Inspiron 13 5310 (2021)

Size Comparison

307 mm 195 mm 17 mm 1.3 kg304.2 mm 203 mm 13.9 mm 1.2 kg304 mm 203 mm 13.9 mm 1.2 kg300 mm 220 mm 16 mm 1.4 kg298 mm 209 mm 17 mm 953 g296.8 mm 210 mm 15.9 mm 1.3 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

连接设备

HDMI 1.4b, 2 x Thunderbolt 4 (Type-C) Power Delivery & DisplayPort, 右侧带Power Delivery功能
HDMI 1.4b, 2 x Thunderbolt 4 (Type-C) Power Delivery & DisplayPort, 右侧带Power Delivery功能
折叠开放的USB 3.2 Gen 1端口,耳机
折叠开放的USB 3.2 Gen 1端口,耳机
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1427 (1280min - 1509max) MBit/s +52%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (49.8 - 1775, n=324)
1161 MBit/s +23%
Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
941 (579min - 1259max) MBit/s
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
940 (858min - 985max) MBit/s 0%
Acer Spin 3 SP313-51N-56YV
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)
758 (682min - 804max) MBit/s -19%
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr
RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE
661 (550min - 752max) MBit/s -30%
iperf3 receive AX12
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1542 (1352min - 1664max) MBit/s +18%
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1459 (1045min - 1609max) MBit/s +11%
Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1309 (1162min - 1362max) MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (136 - 1743, n=324)
1261 MBit/s -4%
Acer Spin 3 SP313-51N-56YV
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)
887 (812min - 947max) MBit/s -32%
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr
RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE
849 (770min - 905max) MBit/s -35%
05010015020025030035040045050055060065070075080085090095010001050110011501200125013001350140014501500155016001650Tooltip
Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1309 (1162-1362)
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 5800U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000); iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø849 (770-905)
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1541 (1352-1664)
Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø941 (579-1259)
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 5800U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000); iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø661 (550-752)
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø941 (858-985)

作为网络摄像头,继续使用一个带有机械快门的720p模块。即使在良好的光线条件下,它也不能提供良好的图像质量。没有红外摄像头,所以不能使用Windows Hello。

ColorChecker
35 ∆E
30.9 ∆E
31.7 ∆E
34.3 ∆E
32.6 ∆E
23.1 ∆E
33.6 ∆E
35.5 ∆E
31.7 ∆E
36.4 ∆E
20.7 ∆E
25.7 ∆E
34.3 ∆E
27.6 ∆E
33.5 ∆E
17.2 ∆E
31.1 ∆E
30.8 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
22.8 ∆E
29.6 ∆E
32.5 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J: 27.46 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 36.38 ∆E
带有机械快门的网络摄像头
带有机械快门的网络摄像头

输入设备

灰色的chiclet键盘因其下面的支撑力较弱而受到影响,当你用一定的力气按下按键时,这一点变得特别明显。哑光的防滑键提供了一个明显的压力点,一个适度的行程高度,以及一个柔和的行程。打字时几乎无声无息。由于有白色的、两段式的键盘背景照明,你也可以在较暗的环境中毫无问题地工作。

总的来说,你可以在宽大的键盘区域内使用大的Shift、Ctrl和方向键迅速工作,而没有海绵状的底座成为很大的问题。

ClickPad在角落里反应灵敏,提供了一个短行程的高度,并且几乎是无声地操作。虽然我们发现短行程不令人满意,但这可能是个人品味的问题。哑光表面对手指的阻力很小,而且不滑。

充分利用现有的面积,键盘在强大的压力下有一些轻微的摆动。
充分利用现有的面积,键盘在强大的压力下有一些轻微的摆动。
带集成指纹识别器的电源键
带集成指纹识别器的电源键
安静的ClickPad,但不幸的是,它的行程非常短。
安静的ClickPad,但不幸的是,它的行程非常短。

显示

AUO面板的子像素网格
AUO面板的子像素网格

全高清AUO面板具有多项优势。它很明亮,不反光,覆盖100%的sRGB色彩空间,并提供IPS典型的宽视角。当然,在室外使用时,亮度甚至可以更高,但318cd/m²的亮度已经让你有所收获,特别是在电池运行时没有节流。

322
cd/m²
338
cd/m²
322
cd/m²
308
cd/m²
338
cd/m²
299
cd/m²
312
cd/m²
331
cd/m²
299
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
AUO B133UAN tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 338 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 318.8 cd/m² Minimum: 19 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 338 cd/m²
Contrast: 914:1 (Black: 0.37 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.81 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.89 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
74.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
72.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.35
Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J
AUO B133UAN, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.3"
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng
CMN139D, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3"
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr
AU Optronics AUO6496, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.3"
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S
Samsung (SDC4158), OLED, 1920x1080, 13.3"
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA
Samsung SDC4155 (ATNA33XC09-0), OLED, 1920x1080, 13.3"
Acer Spin 3 SP313-51N-56YV
AU Optronics AUOB493, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.3"
Display
-7%
0%
24%
23%
4%
Display P3 Coverage
72.9
66.4
-9%
73.4
1%
99.9
37%
99.9
37%
78.8
8%
sRGB Coverage
100
97.6
-2%
99.8
0%
100
0%
100
0%
99.8
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
74.6
67.5
-10%
74.8
0%
99.7
34%
97.5
31%
77.6
4%
Response Times
-40%
-16%
88%
94%
-36%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
39 ?(19, 20)
66 ?(30.4, 35.6)
-69%
42.4 ?(22.4, 20)
-9%
4 ?(2.4, 1.6)
90%
2 ?(1, 1)
95%
52 ?(26, 26)
-33%
Response Time Black / White *
26 ?(14, 12)
28.8 ?(11.6, 17.2)
-11%
31.6 ?(17.6, 14)
-22%
4 ?(2, 2)
85%
2 ?(1, 1)
92%
36 ?(21, 15)
-38%
PWM Frequency
26040 ?(40)
60 ?(100)
60 ?(90)
Screen
-19%
-13%
74%
2%
-78%
Brightness middle
338
423
25%
473.9
40%
370
9%
390
15%
338
0%
Brightness
319
405
27%
458
44%
378
18%
368
15%
307
-4%
Brightness Distribution
88
83
-6%
91
3%
96
9%
66
-25%
83
-6%
Black Level *
0.37
0.23
38%
0.36
3%
0.05
86%
0.27
27%
Contrast
914
1839
101%
1316
44%
7400
710%
1252
37%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.81
3.2
-77%
2.99
-65%
4.33
-139%
2.03
-12%
4.63
-156%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.77
5.8
-109%
4.35
-57%
7.04
-154%
3.14
-13%
9.99
-261%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.89
4.7
-149%
4
-112%
0.92
51%
1.28
32%
6.76
-258%
Gamma
2.35 94%
1.99 111%
2.35 94%
2.38 92%
2.4 92%
2.37 93%
CCT
6196 105%
6362 102%
6269 104%
6394 102%
6359 102%
5934 110%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1
1.1
4.14
3.1
1.64
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
61.9
89.4
87
68
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
97.5
100
100
98
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-22% / -19%
-10% / -10%
62% / 64%
40% / 24%
-37% / -52%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14 ms rise
↘ 12 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 59 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
39 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19 ms rise
↘ 20 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 55 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

卡尔曼灰度
卡尔曼灰度
卡尔曼颜色检查器
卡尔曼颜色检查器
考尔曼饱和度
考尔曼饱和度

我们喜欢它的色彩准确性。在交付状态下,灰度和颜色的Delta E值就已经低于2.0了。因此,用光电分光计进行校准是不必要的,因为你的眼睛不会注意到任何变化,即使有一些改进。

外面日光下的300cd/m²面板
外面日光下的300cd/m²面板
不反光的表面有助于
不反光的表面有助于
友通IPS面板的可视角度...
友通IPS面板的可视角度...
...100%的sRGB
...100%的sRGB

业绩

一个35瓦的英特尔SoC和Nvidia dGPU意味着你在这里需要一个双风扇。
一个35瓦的英特尔SoC和Nvidia dGPU意味着你在这里需要一个双风扇。

配备酷睿i5-11300H,8GB的板载内存(不可扩展!),一个Nvidia MX450和东芝的512GB固态硬盘,5310不仅符合当前的技术水平,而且是一个小型的动力屋。那些需要更多的人还可以选择i7-11370H版本,配备16GB的内存。这个决定应该好好考虑,因为你不能扩展内存。

处理器

我们的测试装置包含酷睿i5-11300H有四个核心,理论上最大的涡轮增压时钟速度可达4.4GHz(单核心)。35瓦的SoC确实是为游戏笔记本和工作站准备的,而15瓦的芯片则更多地是次笔记本的标准。

CPU-Z CPU
CPU-Z内存
CPU-Z 主板
GPU-Z英特尔Xe
GPU-Z MX450
HWinfo摘要

Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test

0801602403204004805606407208008809601040112012001280136014401520Tooltip
Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J Intel Core i5-11300H: Ø816 (813.09-820.19)
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng Intel Core i7-1165G7: Ø687 (682.5-699.4)
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 5800U: Ø1313 (1297.77-1389.66)
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S AMD Ryzen 7 5800U: Ø1209 (1163.3-1526.78)
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA Intel Core i7-1165G7: Ø644 (604.98-860.99)
Acer Spin 3 SP313-51N-56YV Intel Core i5-1135G7: Ø700 (666.11-824.1)
Cinebench R15的温度和时钟速度
Cinebench R15的温度和时钟速度

虽然该处理器最初能够短暂地使用高达28瓦的功率(封装功率@4.1GHz),但几秒钟后,消耗量平息在22瓦,这相当于4倍2.8GHz。这种配置是保守的,与SoC真正应该能够处理的35瓦特相差甚远。限制因素是这里的13英寸笔记本电脑的小型冷却系统,打破了我们对惊人性能的期望的泡沫。

R15回路清楚地表明,i5-11300H勉强领先于15瓦的Tiger Lake i5/i7,特别是在恒定负载下。然而,与AMD Ryzen 5000相比,它的劣势非常明显(-38%)。单一基准测试显示了同样的情况:只是勉强好于Core i7-1165G7但明显落后于Ryzen 7 5800U。

Cinebench R23: Single Core | Multi Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Single Core) | CPU (Multi Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Single 64Bit | CPU Multi 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Average of class Subnotebook
  (358 - 2001, n=64, last 2 years)
1668 Points +19%
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
1427 Points +1%
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1419 Points +1%
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
1415 Points +1%
Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J
Intel Core i5-11300H
1406 Points
Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J
Intel Core i5-11300H
1406 Points 0%
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1397 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i5-11300H
  (1218 - 1431, n=11)
1373 Points -2%
Acer Spin 3 SP313-51N-56YV
Intel Core i5-1135G7
1337 Points -5%
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1555 - 21812, n=64, last 2 years)
11654 Points +101%
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
8154 Points +41%
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
7872 (7780.83min - 7871.73max) Points +36%
Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J
Intel Core i5-11300H
5800 Points
Average Intel Core i5-11300H
  (3313 - 6581, n=10)
5564 Points -4%
Acer Spin 3 SP313-51N-56YV
Intel Core i5-1135G7
5171 Points -11%
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng
Intel Core i7-1165G7
4301 Points -26%
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7
4143 Points -29%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Subnotebook
  (128 - 790, n=60, last 2 years)
636 Points +18%
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
555 Points +3%
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
552 Points +2%
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng
Intel Core i7-1165G7
544 Points +1%
Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J
Intel Core i5-11300H
539 Points
Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J
Intel Core i5-11300H
539 Points 0%
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7
529 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i5-11300H
  (431 - 548, n=11)
522 Points -3%
Acer Spin 3 SP313-51N-56YV
Intel Core i5-1135G7
512 Points -5%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Subnotebook
  (579 - 8541, n=60, last 2 years)
4530 Points +103%
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
3303 Points +48%
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
3092 Points +38%
Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J
Intel Core i5-11300H
2237 Points
Average Intel Core i5-11300H
  (1300 - 2533, n=10)
2146 Points -4%
Acer Spin 3 SP313-51N-56YV
Intel Core i5-1135G7
1854 Points -17%
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1679 Points -25%
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1595 Points -29%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Subnotebook
  (72.4 - 307, n=61, last 2 years)
250 Points +103%
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
229 Points +86%
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
227 Points +85%
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7
214 Points +74%
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng
Intel Core i7-1165G7
206 Points +67%
Acer Spin 3 SP313-51N-56YV
Intel Core i5-1135G7
200 Points +63%
Average Intel Core i5-11300H
  (123 - 211, n=8)
173.4 Points +41%
Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J
Intel Core i5-11300H
123 Points
Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J
Intel Core i5-11300H
123 Points 0%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Subnotebook
  (327 - 3345, n=66, last 2 years)
1978 Points +141%
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
1522 Points +86%
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
1390 (1297.77min - 1389.66max) Points +70%
Average Intel Core i5-11300H
  (632 - 990, n=11)
895 Points +9%
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7
860 Points +5%
Acer Spin 3 SP313-51N-56YV
Intel Core i5-1135G7
824 (666.11min - 824.1max) Points 0%
Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J
Intel Core i5-11300H
820 (813.09min - 820.19max) Points
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng
Intel Core i7-1165G7
699 (682.5min - 699.4max) Points -15%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7
732 Seconds * -20%
Acer Spin 3 SP313-51N-56YV
Intel Core i5-1135G7
705 Seconds * -15%
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng
Intel Core i7-1165G7
686 Seconds * -12%
Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J
Intel Core i5-11300H
611 Seconds *
Average Intel Core i5-11300H
  (466 - 862, n=10)
572 Seconds * +6%
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
372.7 Seconds * +39%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (159 - 2271, n=64, last 2 years)
359 Seconds * +41%
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
331 Seconds * +46%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Subnotebook
  (2669 - 6403, n=59, last 2 years)
5478 MIPS +15%
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
5405 MIPS +13%
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
5359 MIPS +12%
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5222 MIPS +9%
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5045 MIPS +5%
Average Intel Core i5-11300H
  (4603 - 4969, n=10)
4872 MIPS +2%
Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J
Intel Core i5-11300H
4784 MIPS
Acer Spin 3 SP313-51N-56YV
Intel Core i5-1135G7
4744 MIPS -1%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Average of class Subnotebook
  (11775 - 77867, n=57, last 2 years)
48297 MIPS +96%
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
43633 MIPS +77%
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
41574 MIPS +69%
Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J
Intel Core i5-11300H
24656 MIPS
Average Intel Core i5-11300H
  (17573 - 26001, n=10)
23562 MIPS -4%
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7
20077 MIPS -19%
Acer Spin 3 SP313-51N-56YV
Intel Core i5-1135G7
19495 MIPS -21%
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng
Intel Core i7-1165G7
18588 MIPS -25%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Average of class Subnotebook
  (621 - 2350, n=59, last 2 years)
1790 Points +24%
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1566 Points +9%
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1495 Points +4%
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
1450 Points +1%
Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J
Intel Core i5-11300H
1439 Points
Average Intel Core i5-11300H
  (1342 - 1462, n=10)
1410 Points -2%
Acer Spin 3 SP313-51N-56YV
Intel Core i5-1135G7
1398 Points -3%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Average of class Subnotebook
  (2557 - 14728, n=59, last 2 years)
10099 Points +84%
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
7026 Points +28%
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5548 Points +1%
Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J
Intel Core i5-11300H
5499 Points
Acer Spin 3 SP313-51N-56YV
Intel Core i5-1135G7
5472 Points 0%
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng
Intel Core i7-1165G7
4899 Points -11%
Average Intel Core i5-11300H
  (3631 - 5499, n=10)
4642 Points -16%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Average of class Subnotebook
  (0.97 - 25.1, n=59, last 2 years)
12.9 fps +84%
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
10.4 fps +48%
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
10.2 fps +45%
Average Intel Core i5-11300H
  (4.32 - 8.38, n=10)
7.04 fps 0%
Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J
Intel Core i5-11300H
7.02 fps
Acer Spin 3 SP313-51N-56YV
Intel Core i5-1135G7
5.69 fps -19%
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5.64 fps -20%
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5.26 fps -25%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7
55.8 s * -3%
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng
Intel Core i7-1165G7
55 s * -1%
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
54.8 s * -1%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (38.5 - 220, n=58, last 2 years)
54.5 s * -1%
Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J
Intel Core i5-11300H
54.2 s *
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
53.9 s * +1%
Average Intel Core i5-11300H
  (43.6 - 59.4, n=10)
49.9 s * +8%
Acer Spin 3 SP313-51N-56YV
Intel Core i5-1135G7
46.6 s * +14%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Acer Spin 3 SP313-51N-56YV
Intel Core i5-1135G7
0.645 sec * -3%
Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J
Intel Core i5-11300H
0.624 sec *
Average Intel Core i5-11300H
  (0.6 - 0.644, n=10)
0.619 sec * +1%
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng
Intel Core i7-1165G7
0.606 sec * +3%
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7
0.57 sec * +9%
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
0.544 sec * +13%
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
0.54 sec * +13%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (0.413 - 1.456, n=59, last 2 years)
0.519 sec * +17%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
123 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
119 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
820 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
539 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
2237 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
1406 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
5800 Points
Help

系统性能

尽管CPU性能略显唏嘘,但对系统性能的主观印象却非常好。首先,这是一个有能力和强大的移动处理器,其次,戴尔5310当然也配备了快速的NVMe固态硬盘,所以输入的实现没有任何明显的延迟。合成的PCMark 10基准测试也确定了在该领域中的良好结果。

PCMark 10 / Score
Average of class Subnotebook
  (4993 - 7788, n=51, last 2 years)
6447 Points +20%
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S
Vega 8, R7 5800U, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
5890 Points +9%
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr
Vega 8, R7 5800U, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
5872 Points +9%
Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J
GeForce MX450, i5-11300H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
5391 Points
Average Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
  (4899 - 5391, n=3)
5208 Points -3%
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng
GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
5160 Points -4%
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
4839 Points -10%
Acer Spin 3 SP313-51N-56YV
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
4676 Points -13%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Average of class Subnotebook
  (9476 - 11331, n=51, last 2 years)
10480 Points +17%
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr
Vega 8, R7 5800U, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
10046 Points +13%
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S
Vega 8, R7 5800U, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
9917 Points +11%
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
9899 Points +11%
Acer Spin 3 SP313-51N-56YV
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
9614 Points +8%
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng
GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
9047 Points +1%
Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J
GeForce MX450, i5-11300H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
8929 Points
Average Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
  (8366 - 8931, n=3)
8742 Points -2%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S
Vega 8, R7 5800U, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
9410 Points +2%
Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J
GeForce MX450, i5-11300H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
9188 Points
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr
Vega 8, R7 5800U, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
9089 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
  (8292 - 9188, n=3)
8678 Points -6%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (6440 - 10623, n=51, last 2 years)
8633 Points -6%
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng
GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
8312 Points -10%
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
6710 Points -27%
Acer Spin 3 SP313-51N-56YV
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
6165 Points -33%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Average of class Subnotebook
  (5305 - 10983, n=51, last 2 years)
8124 Points +57%
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr
Vega 8, R7 5800U, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
6020 Points +16%
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S
Vega 8, R7 5800U, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
5945 Points +15%
Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J
GeForce MX450, i5-11300H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
5184 Points
Average Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
  (4600 - 5388, n=3)
5057 Points -2%
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng
GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
4960 Points -4%
Acer Spin 3 SP313-51N-56YV
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
4684 Points -10%
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
4632 Points -11%
PCMark 10 Score
5391 points
Help

DPC延迟

在我们的标准化延迟测试中(上网冲浪、YouTube 4K视频再现、CPU负载),我们的测试装置显示了一些延迟升高的问题。 原因是ACPI驱动程序。这意味着,我们这里的驱动配置因此不适合实时音频应用。然而,在视频再现过程中没有出现丢帧。

延迟检查器
延迟检查器
延迟检查器驱动程序页面
延迟检查器驱动程序页面
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J
GeForce MX450, i5-11300H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
1723 μs *
Acer Spin 3 SP313-51N-56YV
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
911 μs * +47%
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng
GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
910 μs * +47%
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
909 μs * +47%
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr
Vega 8, R7 5800U, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
903 μs * +48%
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S
Vega 8, R7 5800U, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
395.4 μs * +77%

* ... smaller is better

存储解决方案

虽然东芝NVMe固态硬盘能够很好地对抗英特尔固态硬盘,但它并不属于顶级联盟。华硕的SK海力士 ZenBook 13UM325S向我们展示了这里的可能性。

Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J
Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
Average Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
 
Average of class Subnotebook
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-9%
-2%
54%
1%
79%
Write 4K
131.3
133.5
2%
128.3
-2%
151.6
15%
126.4 ?(89.3 - 207, n=14)
-4%
Read 4K
47.63
39.66
-17%
50.9
7%
63.2
33%
Write Seq
1328
907
-32%
971
-27%
2292
73%
Read Seq
1365
1481
8%
1540
13%
2073
52%
Write 4K Q32T1
381.2
446.2
17%
538
41%
505
32%
Read 4K Q32T1
388.7
335.1
-14%
344.4
-11%
413.5
6%
Write Seq Q32T1
1186
975
-18%
980
-17%
3137
165%
Read Seq Q32T1
2328
1874
-20%
1829
-21%
3604
55%
Write 4K Q8T8
488.9
Read 4K Q8T8
1276
AS SSD
-7%
-13%
70%
-26%
78%
Seq Read
1897
1608
-15%
1616
-15%
2916
54%
Seq Write
741
659
-11%
761
3%
1566
111%
4K Read
50
51.3
3%
46.87
-6%
56
12%
4K Write
122
151.8
24%
126.6
4%
159.8
31%
4K-64 Read
1060
322.1
-70%
324.6
-69%
1011
-5%
4K-64 Write
723
800
11%
815
13%
2136
195%
Access Time Read *
0.07
0.077
-10%
0.074
-6%
0.028
60%
0.1024 ?(0.058 - 0.169, n=14)
-46%
Access Time Write *
0.168
0.046
73%
0.135
20%
0.028
83%
0.4026 ?(0.168 - 0.718, n=14)
-140%
Score Read
1300
534
-59%
533
-59%
1359
5%
Score Write
921
1018
11%
1018
11%
2452
166%
Score Total
2838
1797
-37%
1798
-37%
4451
57%
2461 ?(1685 - 3316, n=14)
-13%
Copy ISO MB/s
961
906
1983
Copy Program MB/s
753
614
792
Copy Game MB/s
896
539
1457
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-8% / -8%
-8% / -8%
62% / 63%
-13% / -15%
79% / 78%

* ... smaller is better

Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
Sequential Read: 1657 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1271 MB/s
512K Read: 1202 MB/s
512K Write: 1120 MB/s
4K Read: 51 MB/s
4K Write: 136 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 393 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 392 MB/s

Constant Performance Reading: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

No graph data

图形卡

ǞǞǞMX450(图灵TU117M)是第二个最强大的N18S-G5版本,除了GDDR6之外,还有64位连接和1395至1575 MHz。它的消耗量高达25瓦,这也是我们的设备需要第二个风扇的原因。

N18S-G5-B: GBD-128封装, 1395 - 1575 MHz, GDDR6 5001 MHz, 28.5 W

N18S-G5:GB2E-64封装,1395 - 1575 MHz,GDDR6 5001 MHz,25 W

N18S-G5:GB2E-64封装,1395 - 1575 MHz,GDDR5 3501 MHz,25 W

N18S-LP: GB2E-64封装,720 - 930 MHz,GDDR6 5001 MHz,12 W

除了GeForce MX450 GPU之外,还有集成的英特尔Iris Xe 80EUs图形。在合成基准测试中, MX450正在加入顶端,表现在Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs的水平。它领先20-40%的Vega 8.

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i5-11300H
9580 Points +5%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (968 - 16296, n=56, last 2 years)
9532 Points +4%
Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i5-11300H
9131 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450
  (6341 - 9580, n=16)
8129 Points -11%
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
6642 Points -27%
Acer Spin 3 SP313-51N-56YV
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1135G7
5944 Points -35%
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
5870 Points -36%
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
5842 Points -36%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Subnotebook
  (832 - 11887, n=60, last 2 years)
6964 Points +30%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i5-11300H
5573 Points +4%
Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i5-11300H
5361 Points
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
5358 Points 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450
  (4336 - 5753, n=17)
4869 Points -9%
Acer Spin 3 SP313-51N-56YV
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1135G7
4785 Points -11%
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i7-1165G7
4571 Points -15%
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
3861 Points -28%
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
3399 Points -37%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Subnotebook
  (804 - 4501, n=61, last 2 years)
2566 Points +90%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i5-11300H
2300 Points +71%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450
  (1086 - 2300, n=16)
1796 Points +33%
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
1512 Points +12%
Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i5-11300H
1347 Points
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
1128 Points -16%
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
1082 Points -20%
3DMark 11 Performance
9244 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
4886 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
1515 points
Help

游戏性能

在真正的游戏基准测试中,我们看到与Iris相比,大约有10-30%的优势。 Xe 96EUsVega 8.然而,性能仍然略有下降,正如"TheWitcher 3" 高所示。一台联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6带有一个相同的 MX450N18S-G5获得30%的帧数。

TheWitcher 3 Ultra - MX450的图形压力 - 时钟速度和温度
TheWitcher 3 Ultra - MX450的图形压力 - 时钟速度和温度

The Witcher 3 FPS Diagram

0510152025Tooltip
Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J GeForce MX450, i5-11300H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe: Ø23.2 (22-26)
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 GeForce MX450, i5-11300H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ: Ø26 (25-27)

上述 "Witcher 3 Ultra - 图形压力为 MX450"显示了GPU时钟速度是如何在最初几分钟内从1800下降到1200MHz的,因为系统试图将热量发展从近70 ºC(158ºF)降到明显低于60ºC(140ºF)。这种节流也发生在其他游戏中,正如"奇怪的旅"或"X平面11.11"也显示的那样。

因此,简而言之,虽然戴尔使用了一个强大的版本的 MX45025瓦,但它并没有被充分使用。即使是最慢的N18S-LP版本,在HP Envy 13-ba1475ng在某些方面在实际游戏中得到更好的表现("TheWitcher 3 ,"X-Plane 11.11")。

The Witcher 3
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
42.8 (12.2min, 16.6P0.1, 29.7P1 - 169max) fps +30%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (11.2 - 71, n=51, last 2 years)
41.2 fps +25%
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng
Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
35 fps +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450
  (21 - 46, n=16)
34.8 fps +5%
Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
33 fps
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
30.15 fps -9%
Acer Spin 3 SP313-51N-56YV
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
25 fps -24%
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
23.4 (22min - 26max) fps -29%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
24.3 (12.1min, 14.5P0.1, 19.1P1 - 111max) fps +6%
Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
23 fps
Average of class Subnotebook
  (8.5 - 43.7, n=53, last 2 years)
21.8 fps -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450
  (17.2 - 24.8, n=16)
20.8 fps -10%
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng
Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
18 fps -22%
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
15.4 (14min - 17max) fps -33%
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
14.2 fps -38%
Acer Spin 3 SP313-51N-56YV
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
12 fps -48%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
95.5 (80.2min) fps +15%
Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
82.9 (61.5min) fps
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng
Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
81.9 (68.1min) fps -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450
  (34.9 - 104.6, n=20)
79.9 fps -4%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (13 - 99.5, n=64, last 2 years)
62.5 fps -25%
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
48.3 (42.5min) fps -42%
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
47.2 (23.4min) fps -43%
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
45.6 (40.9min) fps -45%
Acer Spin 3 SP313-51N-56YV
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
38.8 (26.9min) fps -53%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 Standard Quality
Average of class Subnotebook
  (16.3 - 59.9, n=62, last 2 years)
33.2 fps +5%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
33 fps +4%
Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
31.6 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450
  (25 - 34.5, n=13)
28.7 fps -9%
Acer Spin 3 SP313-51N-56YV
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
18.2 fps -42%
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
17.4 fps -45%
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
16.6 fps -47%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
62.6 fps +41%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450
  (35.4 - 71.4, n=20)
54.9 fps +24%
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng
Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
51.2 fps +15%
Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
44.4 fps
Average of class Subnotebook
  (20.7 - 97.1, n=57, last 2 years)
34 fps -23%
Acer Spin 3 SP313-51N-56YV
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
33 fps -26%
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
30.5 fps -31%
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
29.9 fps -33%
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
29.7 fps -33%
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 high AA:high AF:8
Average of class Subnotebook
  (19.4 - 80.9, n=62, last 2 years)
47.9 fps +13%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
46.7 (38.7min, 39.3P1 - 62.7max) fps +10%
Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
42.4 (32.7min, 35.7P1 - 57.4max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450
  (19.2 - 46.7, n=12)
39.2 fps -8%
Acer Spin 3 SP313-51N-56YV
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
26 fps -39%
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
25 (18.2min, 19.6P1 - 42.5max) fps -41%
lowmed.highultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 112 71 33 23
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 130 118 103 82.9
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 58.3 31.6
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 64.9 53.4 44.4
Strange Brigade (2018) 127 49.6 42.4 33.1

Emissions and Power Management

噪声排放

体积特征
体积特征

在空闲运行期间,双风扇是安静的。无论我们选择超性能、优化或安静模式,它们都是关闭的。我们在超性能模式下进行了性能测试,在优化模式下进行了电池测试。

在负载情况下,噪音水平最高接近48 dB(A),这可能是受选择戴尔性能模式的影响。在安静模式下,噪音量降至44,在优化模式下降至46 dB(A)。

Noise Level

Idle
26 / 26 / 26 dB(A)
Load
48 / 48.3 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 26 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs202627.528.427.826.928.226252526.730.133.83032.2253128.830.131.628.231.731.928.84023.928.225.925.327.427.823.95033.635.53736.637.228.633.663212220.921.722.924218015.918.525.918.218.322.615.910016.322.219.620.322.418.316.312517.52018.520.421.118.417.516018.221.421.821.421.816.918.220016.620.619.12020.71616.625015.320.419.819.62014.215.331514.822.620.922.422.713.714.840013.428.724.627.129.71313.450013.128.226.827.929.812.513.1630133128.430.431.912.41380013.230.32728.530.812.613.2100013.333.430.132.134.412.413.3125013.133.430.432.734.112.713.1160013.734.6313335.212.913.7200013.436.132.734.636.813.713.4250013.835.631.734.236.213.713.8315014.735.731.633.736.11414.7400014.235.431.23335.114.114.2500014.436.532.334.536.414.414.4630014.538.73536.939.114.514.5800015.341.836.84041.715.115.31000015.938.130.234.138.21515.91250015.235.627.931.835.71515.21600013.927.120.523.626.913.513.9SPL26.24843.946.248.325.926.2N0.85.94.45.26.10.70.8median 14.4median 33.4median 28.4median 31.8median 34.1median 14median 14.4Delta1.36.15.25.45.41.11.330.228.630.822.325.525.929.829.328.626.726.228.534.927.335.222.820.222.421.818.625.528.924.229.321.720.62424.221.325.72420.224.520.518.321.921.616.124.222.716.724.32615.628.727.712.831.227.711.53027.611.530.929.510.733.231.910.63532.21135.429.511.233.52811.532.623.11228.420.212.225.118.812.423.11612.420.514.112.518.412.912.414.811.811.712.639.924.643.42.90.63.9median 24median 12.4median 25.74.72.54.9hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseDell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24JHP Envy 13-ba1475ng

温度

在空闲运行期间,这台13英寸的笔记本电脑保持凉爽,我们测量的平均温度只有28ºC(82ºF)。在高负荷下("Witcher 3")--在GPU节流的情况下--产生的平均温度为37ºC(99ºF ),有些地方达到52ºC(126ºF)。

我们用Prime95和Furmark进行的压力测试评估了系统如何在较长的时间内处理最大负荷。在这里,表面温度将进一步增加(58ºC,顶部136ºF),在82ºC(180 ºF)的峰值之后 ,核心的温度在略高于60ºC(140ºF )的位置趋于平衡。3分钟后,封装功率在于15瓦,它只能维持2分钟的25瓦。 在压力测试后,没有立即降低性能。

压力测试温度和时钟速度
压力测试温度和时钟速度
Prime95和Furmark
Prime95和Furmark
Max. Load
 45.2 °C58.4 °C47.2 °C 
 39 °C44.5 °C31 °C 
 28.4 °C27.2 °C27.2 °C 
Maximum: 58.4 °C
Average: 38.7 °C
53.5 °C58.4 °C52.6 °C
30.4 °C31.5 °C32 °C
26.2 °C28.8 °C29.1 °C
Maximum: 58.4 °C
Average: 38.1 °C
Power Supply (max.)  57.9 °C | Room Temperature 22.2 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.7 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 58.4 °C / 137 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 58.4 °C / 137 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.9 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 37.6 °C / 100 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.4 °C / 83.1 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-0.1 °C / -0.2 F).
空闲运行 - 顶部 - 优化模式
空闲运行 - 顶部 - 优化模式
怠速运行 - 底部
怠速运行 - 底部
CPU+GPU压力测试Prime95和Furmark - 顶部 - 超性能模式
CPU+GPU压力测试Prime95和Furmark - 顶部 - 超性能模式
CPU+GPU压力测试Prime95 & Furmark - 底部
CPU+GPU压力测试Prime95 & Furmark - 底部
Witcher 3 Ultra GPU压力测试 - 顶部 - 超性能模式
Witcher 3 Ultra GPU压力测试 - 顶部 - 超性能模式
Witcher 3 Ultra GPU压力测试 - 底部
Witcher 3 Ultra GPU压力测试 - 底部

发言人

粉红噪声扬声器特性
粉红噪声扬声器特性

这两个立体声扬声器没有什么可抱怨的。虽然由于外形尺寸小,几乎没有任何低音,但其他方面的声音是令人愉快的。你甚至可以使用这些扬声器播放视频和一些音乐,没有任何问题,而且你不一定需要耳机或外部扬声器。扬声器位于掌托下方,朝下指向桌面。双阵列麦克风可以干净地记录声音,几乎没有额外的噪音,适合会议使用。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2027.928.227.92528.532.228.53132.231.932.2402727.8275034.228.634.26325.92425.98038.322.638.310044.418.344.412546.718.446.716046.316.946.320046.81646.825054.814.254.831557.413.757.440061.11361.150064.812.564.863065.512.465.580072.612.672.6100070.912.470.9125070.712.770.7160070.512.970.5200072.213.772.2250072.813.772.8315071.11471.140007414.174500070.214.470.2630073.814.573.8800083.915.183.91000086.41586.41250088.41588.41600082.313.582.3SPL89.925.989.9N69.40.769.4median 70.7median 14median 70.7Delta61.1631.834.931.840.138.440.135.743.235.730.233.230.234.334.934.324.931.424.929.426.329.441.425.141.449234950.719.750.746.919.246.95817.45865.817.965.872.115.172.170.114.270.17214.47275.113.775.175.713.775.771.813.771.874.813.674.874.213.974.270.914.270.966.11466.165.414.565.465.714.765.766.715.166.771.915.371.979.416.179.474.915.274.963.615.563.684.626.884.663.50.963.5median 70.1median 15.1median 70.15.11.95.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseDell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24JAsus ZenBook 13 UX325EA
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

消耗功率

在空闲运行期间,功耗在3.6至10瓦之间,这对于一台具有良好TFT亮度的13英寸笔记本电脑来说是一个正常值。事实上,在压力测试期间,电源加热到58 ºC(136ºF),这表明它被过度拉伸了,也许也是英特尔处理器性能发展低于平均水平的原因。

压力测试期间的功耗显示在将近2分钟后从68瓦特下降到62瓦特。这也是时钟速度从已经很低的2400MHz进一步降低到1700MHz的时候。在"TheWitcher 3" Ultra--游戏中的最高负载--中,这种性能降低行为也发生在第2分钟。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.5 / 0.9 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 3.6 / 5.6 / 10.1 Watt
Load midlight 40.8 / 64 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy

Power Consumption The Witcher 3 / Stress Test

0102030405060708090100Tooltip
Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J i5-11300H, GeForce MX450; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø40.3 (37.5-46.4)
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr R7 5800U, Vega 8; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø35.2 (31.8-41.5)
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 i5-11300H, GeForce MX450; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø72.4 (69.7-85.3)
Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J i5-11300H, GeForce MX450; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø64.2 (56.8-68.1)
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr R7 5800U, Vega 8; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø32.5 (31.8-43.1)
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 i5-11300H, GeForce MX450; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø100.7 (94.5-105)

电池寿命

54瓦的电池容量保证了实际使用中10小时的电池寿命,我们在Wi-Fi测试中以150cd/m²的亮度进行了测试。扁平的锂聚合物电池被分成两块,就像最初为SATA保留的小区域,但现在可以使用了。

锂聚合物电池,54瓦时
锂聚合物电池,54瓦时
Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J
i5-11300H, GeForce MX450, 54 Wh
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng
i7-1165G7, GeForce MX450, 51 Wh
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr
R7 5800U, Vega 8, 43 Wh
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S
R7 5800U, Vega 8, 67 Wh
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 67 Wh
Acer Spin 3 SP313-51N-56YV
i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 48 Wh
Average of class Subnotebook
 
Battery Runtime
1%
-13%
-11%
74%
-22%
17%
WiFi Websurfing
618
624
1%
539
-13%
551
-11%
640
4%
483
-22%
1920x1080 Witcher 3 ultra 150cd
78
190
144%
Battery Runtime
Reader / Idle
1340
1133
-15%
1394
4%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
1% / 1%
-14% / -14%
-4% / -4%
74% / 74%
-22% / -22%
24% / 24%
Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
22h 20min
Witcher 3 ultra 150cd
1h 18min
WiFi Websurfing
10h 18min

Pros

+ 在一个13英寸的笔记本电脑中具有很大的图形能力
+ 2 x Thunderbolt 4
+ 优雅的铝制外壳,具有良好的触觉效果
+ 哑光显示屏
+ 快速的Wi-Fi
+ 外壳底部可以很容易地拆除

Cons

- CPU/GPU性能不理想
- 板载RAM不能扩展
- 网络摄像头较弱
- 电源在负载下会发热
- 底座的表面可以被压住

评语。一款被硬件压倒的副笔记本

戴尔Inspiron 13 5310,测试装置由数码港提供
戴尔Inspiron 13 5310,测试装置由数码港提供

制造商在这里搞了一些花架子,因为处理器和显卡无法产生根据规格表(以及我们数据库中的平均数)应该有的性能。即使这款笔记本电脑包含一个35瓦的SoC,它也没有用足35瓦。同样的情况也适用于 MX450显卡也是如此,尽管戴尔使用了带有GDDR6的25瓦版本,但它的速度很快就被扼杀了,这在游戏中成为一个缺点。

因此,我们的测试带来了一些幻觉。戴尔Inspiron 13 5310中有限的冷却装置并不是为这么大的功率而设计的,而更厚的15英寸笔记本似乎更适合Tiger Lake-H和 MX450.

同时,所有这些都是在高层次上的讨价还价。总的来说,我们看到的是一款功能适中的副笔记本,它的连接和显示效果得到了一些分数。哑光、明亮的显示屏以其准确的色彩取悦于人,而且有2个Thunderbolt 4,你准备好对接解决方案和未来的外围设备,直至外部显卡。WLAN的速度足够快,维护也很容易--尽管工作存储器是焊接的。最后,电池寿命和重量也发挥了作用,在这方面,1.3公斤(约3磅)和10小时是一个奖励。

那些在路上需要更多CPU计算能力但又不想花更多钱的人应该仔细看看AMD的机型 HPPavilion Aero 13be0097nr和华硕 ZenBook 13UM325S。

另一方面,那些不想没有MX450级别的显卡的人,目前在13英寸尺寸因素中几乎找不到更好的选择。唯一的其他选择是 HP Envy 13-ba1475ng使用慢速的12瓦MX450,15瓦的处理器,并且不提供Thunderbolt。配备iGPU的设备,如 Vega 8或Iris Xe G7 96EUs等iGPU的设备,在实际游戏中产生的性能不如25瓦的MX450(N18S-G5)所能提供的性能,即使它没有满功率运行。

价格和可用性

戴尔Inspiron 13 5310的16GB配置在,售价982美元。.

Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J - 09/03/2021 v7 (old)
Sebastian Jentsch

Chassis
87 / 98 → 88%
Keyboard
81%
Pointing Device
85%
Connectivity
64 / 75 → 85%
Weight
71 / 20-75 → 93%
Battery
88%
Display
90%
Games Performance
74 / 78 → 95%
Application Performance
87 / 85 → 100%
Temperature
83%
Noise
83%
Audio
79 / 91 → 87%
Camera
22 / 85 → 26%
Average
76%
86%
Subnotebook - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 戴尔Inspiron 13 5310评论。更多的图形,更多的电池寿命
Sebastian Jentsch, 2021-09- 6 (Update: 2021-09- 6)