戴尔Inspiron 13 5310评论。更多的图形,更多的电池寿命
几个月前,我们刚刚拥有了 Inspiron 13 5301,这是一款13英寸的笔记本电脑,配有15瓦的Tiger Lake SoC和Iris Xe显卡,在我们的测试中。虽然标签几乎没有任何不同,但与我们目前测试的Inspiron 13 5310的实际差异是根本性的:35瓦的处理器,Nvidia MX450显卡,2 x Thunderbolt 4,以及54瓦时而非40瓦时。虽然外壳看起来非常相似,但我们不能真正谈论一个相同的构建,因为双方的连接已经改变。
戴尔的Inspiron 13 5310针对的是那些希望在一台紧凑的移动笔记本电脑中获得尽可能多的性能的移动买家。重量为1.3公斤(约3磅),电池寿命超过10小时,这也是他们在这里得到的东西。此外,还有一个明亮、不反光的显示屏,提供强大的sRGB颜色。有了这一切,它真的只能成为一种推荐,或者说,它可以吗?
虽然具有可比性的13英寸笔记本电脑很少,但有广泛的竞争对手选择。在这方面,这里只有HP Envy 13-ba1475ng。该惠普Pavilion Aero 13be0097nr和华硕ZenBook 13UM325S配备的功能较少,其Vega 8的,因为也是华硕ZenBook 13 UX325EA与Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs.你可以在下面的性能部分找到相应的比较。
Possible Competitors in Comparison
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
85.7 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2021 | Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J i5-11300H, GeForce MX450 | 1.3 kg | 15.9 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1200 | |
85.3 % v7 (old) | HP Envy 13-ba1475ng i7-1165G7, GeForce MX450 | 1.3 kg | 17 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 | ||
84.4 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2021 | HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr R7 5800U, Vega 8 | 953 g | 17 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1200 | |
88.5 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2021 | Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S R7 5800U, Vega 8 | 1.2 kg | 13.9 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 | |
88.9 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2021 | Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.2 kg | 13.9 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 | |
85.7 % v7 (old) | Acer Spin 3 SP313-51N-56YV i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.4 kg | 16 mm | 13.30" | 2560x1600 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
案例和设备
盖子和底座的顶部是由铝制成的,这为13英寸的笔记本电脑提供了高质量的触觉以及一个体面的稳定性。箱子只能有很小的翘曲,铰链也能完成任务。然而,稳定性在键盘下方和掌托的顶部区域达到了极限,那里的表面在哪怕是轻微的压力下都会弯曲,比如当我们在ClickPad的前三分之一处按下时。
易于维护的特点值得称赞。卸下许多螺丝后,只要从铰链处开始,你就可以简单地掀开底板。不幸的是,工作内存是焊接在一起的,所以你在购买设备时就承诺了8GB的容量。你只能更换M.2 2280 SSD和Wi-Fi卡。由于高TDP,双风扇是必要的,除了35瓦的CPU之外,它们还必须冷却Geforce MX450在同一时间。
虽然没有读卡器,但有两个Thunderbolt 4(Type-C)端口,都支持DisplayPort。其中一个还可以处理Power Delivery,这也是用相应的65瓦充电器为笔记本充电的唯一途径。剩下的一个USB Type-A端口被实现为一个折叠式端口,这对视觉效果来说是一个很好的解决方案。
英特尔的Wi-Fi 6 AX201被用作WLAN。在我们与Netgear Nighthawk RAX120参考路由器的测试中,传输速率在良好和略低于平均水平之间。包括蓝牙5.2,但在低功耗方面没有其他可能。
连接设备
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng | |
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (49.8 - 1775, n=324) | |
Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA | |
Acer Spin 3 SP313-51N-56YV | |
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA | |
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng | |
Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J | |
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (136 - 1743, n=324) | |
Acer Spin 3 SP313-51N-56YV | |
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr |
作为网络摄像头,继续使用一个带有机械快门的720p模块。即使在良好的光线条件下,它也不能提供良好的图像质量。没有红外摄像头,所以不能使用Windows Hello。
输入设备
灰色的chiclet键盘因其下面的支撑力较弱而受到影响,当你用一定的力气按下按键时,这一点变得特别明显。哑光的防滑键提供了一个明显的压力点,一个适度的行程高度,以及一个柔和的行程。打字时几乎无声无息。由于有白色的、两段式的键盘背景照明,你也可以在较暗的环境中毫无问题地工作。
总的来说,你可以在宽大的键盘区域内使用大的Shift、Ctrl和方向键迅速工作,而没有海绵状的底座成为很大的问题。
ClickPad在角落里反应灵敏,提供了一个短行程的高度,并且几乎是无声地操作。虽然我们发现短行程不令人满意,但这可能是个人品味的问题。哑光表面对手指的阻力很小,而且不滑。
显示
全高清AUO面板具有多项优势。它很明亮,不反光,覆盖100%的sRGB色彩空间,并提供IPS典型的宽视角。当然,在室外使用时,亮度甚至可以更高,但318cd/m²的亮度已经让你有所收获,特别是在电池运行时没有节流。
|
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 338 cd/m²
Contrast: 914:1 (Black: 0.37 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.81 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.89 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
74.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
72.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.35
Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J AUO B133UAN, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.3" | HP Envy 13-ba1475ng CMN139D, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr AU Optronics AUO6496, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.3" | Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S Samsung (SDC4158), OLED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA Samsung SDC4155 (ATNA33XC09-0), OLED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Acer Spin 3 SP313-51N-56YV AU Optronics AUOB493, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.3" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -7% | 0% | 24% | 23% | 4% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 72.9 | 66.4 -9% | 73.4 1% | 99.9 37% | 99.9 37% | 78.8 8% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 97.6 -2% | 99.8 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 99.8 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 74.6 | 67.5 -10% | 74.8 0% | 99.7 34% | 97.5 31% | 77.6 4% |
Response Times | -40% | -16% | 88% | 94% | -36% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 39 ? | 66 ? -69% | 42.4 ? -9% | 4 ? 90% | 2 ? 95% | 52 ? -33% |
Response Time Black / White * | 26 ? | 28.8 ? -11% | 31.6 ? -22% | 4 ? 85% | 2 ? 92% | 36 ? -38% |
PWM Frequency | 26040 ? | 60 ? | 60 ? | |||
Screen | -19% | -13% | 74% | 2% | -78% | |
Brightness middle | 338 | 423 25% | 473.9 40% | 370 9% | 390 15% | 338 0% |
Brightness | 319 | 405 27% | 458 44% | 378 18% | 368 15% | 307 -4% |
Brightness Distribution | 88 | 83 -6% | 91 3% | 96 9% | 66 -25% | 83 -6% |
Black Level * | 0.37 | 0.23 38% | 0.36 3% | 0.05 86% | 0.27 27% | |
Contrast | 914 | 1839 101% | 1316 44% | 7400 710% | 1252 37% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.81 | 3.2 -77% | 2.99 -65% | 4.33 -139% | 2.03 -12% | 4.63 -156% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.77 | 5.8 -109% | 4.35 -57% | 7.04 -154% | 3.14 -13% | 9.99 -261% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.89 | 4.7 -149% | 4 -112% | 0.92 51% | 1.28 32% | 6.76 -258% |
Gamma | 2.35 94% | 1.99 111% | 2.35 94% | 2.38 92% | 2.4 92% | 2.37 93% |
CCT | 6196 105% | 6362 102% | 6269 104% | 6394 102% | 6359 102% | 5934 110% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1 | 1.1 | 4.14 | 3.1 | 1.64 | |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 61.9 | 89.4 | 87 | 68 | ||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 97.5 | 100 | 100 | 98 | ||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -22% /
-19% | -10% /
-10% | 62% /
64% | 40% /
24% | -37% /
-52% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14 ms rise | |
↘ 12 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 59 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
39 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19 ms rise | |
↘ 20 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 55 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
我们喜欢它的色彩准确性。在交付状态下,灰度和颜色的Delta E值就已经低于2.0了。因此,用光电分光计进行校准是不必要的,因为你的眼睛不会注意到任何变化,即使有一些改进。
业绩
配备酷睿i5-11300H,8GB的板载内存(不可扩展!),一个Nvidia MX450和东芝的512GB固态硬盘,5310不仅符合当前的技术水平,而且是一个小型的动力屋。那些需要更多的人还可以选择i7-11370H版本,配备16GB的内存。这个决定应该好好考虑,因为你不能扩展内存。
处理器
我们的测试装置包含酷睿i5-11300H有四个核心,理论上最大的涡轮增压时钟速度可达4.4GHz(单核心)。35瓦的SoC确实是为游戏笔记本和工作站准备的,而15瓦的芯片则更多地是次笔记本的标准。
Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test
Cinebench R20: CPU (Single Core) | CPU (Multi Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Single 64Bit | CPU Multi 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Average of class Subnotebook (358 - 2001, n=64, last 2 years) | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA | |
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr | |
Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J | |
Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J | |
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng | |
Average Intel Core i5-11300H (1218 - 1431, n=11) | |
Acer Spin 3 SP313-51N-56YV |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1555 - 21812, n=64, last 2 years) | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S | |
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr | |
Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J | |
Average Intel Core i5-11300H (3313 - 6581, n=10) | |
Acer Spin 3 SP313-51N-56YV | |
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (128 - 790, n=60, last 2 years) | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S | |
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr | |
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng | |
Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J | |
Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA | |
Average Intel Core i5-11300H (431 - 548, n=11) | |
Acer Spin 3 SP313-51N-56YV |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (579 - 8541, n=60, last 2 years) | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S | |
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr | |
Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J | |
Average Intel Core i5-11300H (1300 - 2533, n=10) | |
Acer Spin 3 SP313-51N-56YV | |
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Average of class Subnotebook (72.4 - 307, n=61, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA | |
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng | |
Acer Spin 3 SP313-51N-56YV | |
Average Intel Core i5-11300H (123 - 211, n=8) | |
Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J | |
Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average of class Subnotebook (327 - 3345, n=66, last 2 years) | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S | |
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr | |
Average Intel Core i5-11300H (632 - 990, n=11) | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA | |
Acer Spin 3 SP313-51N-56YV | |
Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J | |
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA | |
Acer Spin 3 SP313-51N-56YV | |
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng | |
Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J | |
Average Intel Core i5-11300H (466 - 862, n=10) | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S | |
Average of class Subnotebook (159 - 2271, n=64, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (2669 - 6403, n=59, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA | |
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng | |
Average Intel Core i5-11300H (4603 - 4969, n=10) | |
Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J | |
Acer Spin 3 SP313-51N-56YV |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (11775 - 77867, n=57, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S | |
Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J | |
Average Intel Core i5-11300H (17573 - 26001, n=10) | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA | |
Acer Spin 3 SP313-51N-56YV | |
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Average of class Subnotebook (621 - 2350, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA | |
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S | |
Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J | |
Average Intel Core i5-11300H (1342 - 1462, n=10) | |
Acer Spin 3 SP313-51N-56YV |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Average of class Subnotebook (2557 - 14728, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA | |
Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J | |
Acer Spin 3 SP313-51N-56YV | |
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng | |
Average Intel Core i5-11300H (3631 - 5499, n=10) |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Average of class Subnotebook (0.97 - 25.1, n=59, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S | |
Average Intel Core i5-11300H (4.32 - 8.38, n=10) | |
Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J | |
Acer Spin 3 SP313-51N-56YV | |
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA | |
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S | |
Average of class Subnotebook (38.5 - 220, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J | |
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr | |
Average Intel Core i5-11300H (43.6 - 59.4, n=10) | |
Acer Spin 3 SP313-51N-56YV |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Acer Spin 3 SP313-51N-56YV | |
Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J | |
Average Intel Core i5-11300H (0.6 - 0.644, n=10) | |
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S | |
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr | |
Average of class Subnotebook (0.413 - 1.456, n=59, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
系统性能
尽管CPU性能略显唏嘘,但对系统性能的主观印象却非常好。首先,这是一个有能力和强大的移动处理器,其次,戴尔5310当然也配备了快速的NVMe固态硬盘,所以输入的实现没有任何明显的延迟。合成的PCMark 10基准测试也确定了在该领域中的良好结果。
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Average of class Subnotebook (4993 - 7788, n=51, last 2 years) | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S | |
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr | |
Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J | |
Average Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (4899 - 5391, n=3) | |
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA | |
Acer Spin 3 SP313-51N-56YV |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Average of class Subnotebook (9476 - 11331, n=51, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA | |
Acer Spin 3 SP313-51N-56YV | |
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng | |
Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J | |
Average Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (8366 - 8931, n=3) |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S | |
Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J | |
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr | |
Average Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (8292 - 9188, n=3) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (6440 - 10623, n=51, last 2 years) | |
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA | |
Acer Spin 3 SP313-51N-56YV |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Average of class Subnotebook (5305 - 10983, n=51, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S | |
Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J | |
Average Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (4600 - 5388, n=3) | |
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng | |
Acer Spin 3 SP313-51N-56YV | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA |
PCMark 10 Score | 5391 points | |
Help |
DPC延迟
在我们的标准化延迟测试中(上网冲浪、YouTube 4K视频再现、CPU负载),我们的测试装置显示了一些延迟升高的问题。 原因是ACPI驱动程序。这意味着,我们这里的驱动配置因此不适合实时音频应用。然而,在视频再现过程中没有出现丢帧。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J | |
Acer Spin 3 SP313-51N-56YV | |
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA | |
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S |
* ... smaller is better
存储解决方案
虽然东芝NVMe固态硬盘能够很好地对抗英特尔固态硬盘,但它并不属于顶级联盟。华硕的SK海力士 ZenBook 13UM325S向我们展示了这里的可能性。
Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe | HP Envy 13-ba1475ng Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N | Average Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe | Average of class Subnotebook | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -9% | -2% | 54% | 1% | 79% | |
Write 4K | 131.3 | 133.5 2% | 128.3 -2% | 151.6 15% | 126.4 ? -4% | 147.8 ? 13% |
Read 4K | 47.63 | 39.66 -17% | 50.9 7% | 63.2 33% | 50 ? 5% | 63 ? 32% |
Write Seq | 1328 | 907 -32% | 971 -27% | 2292 73% | 1207 ? -9% | 2580 ? 94% |
Read Seq | 1365 | 1481 8% | 1540 13% | 2073 52% | 1567 ? 15% | 2852 ? 109% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 381.2 | 446.2 17% | 538 41% | 505 32% | 347 ? -9% | 408 ? 7% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 388.7 | 335.1 -14% | 344.4 -11% | 413.5 6% | 425 ? 9% | 464 ? 19% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 1186 | 975 -18% | 980 -17% | 3137 165% | 1224 ? 3% | 3976 ? 235% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 2328 | 1874 -20% | 1829 -21% | 3604 55% | 2278 ? -2% | 5231 ? 125% |
Write 4K Q8T8 | 488.9 | 315 ? | 883 ? | |||
Read 4K Q8T8 | 1276 | 854 ? | 1309 ? | |||
AS SSD | -7% | -13% | 70% | -26% | 78% | |
Seq Read | 1897 | 1608 -15% | 1616 -15% | 2916 54% | 1871 ? -1% | 4057 ? 114% |
Seq Write | 741 | 659 -11% | 761 3% | 1566 111% | 810 ? 9% | 2631 ? 255% |
4K Read | 50 | 51.3 3% | 46.87 -6% | 56 12% | 45.8 ? -8% | 58.5 ? 17% |
4K Write | 122 | 151.8 24% | 126.6 4% | 159.8 31% | 110.9 ? -9% | 176 ? 44% |
4K-64 Read | 1060 | 322.1 -70% | 324.6 -69% | 1011 -5% | 997 ? -6% | 908 ? -14% |
4K-64 Write | 723 | 800 11% | 815 13% | 2136 195% | 452 ? -37% | 1867 ? 158% |
Access Time Read * | 0.07 | 0.077 -10% | 0.074 -6% | 0.028 60% | 0.1024 ? -46% | 0.05717 ? 18% |
Access Time Write * | 0.168 | 0.046 73% | 0.135 20% | 0.028 83% | 0.4026 ? -140% | 0.07341 ? 56% |
Score Read | 1300 | 534 -59% | 533 -59% | 1359 5% | 1232 ? -5% | 1372 ? 6% |
Score Write | 921 | 1018 11% | 1018 11% | 2452 166% | 644 ? -30% | 2309 ? 151% |
Score Total | 2838 | 1797 -37% | 1798 -37% | 4451 57% | 2461 ? -13% | 4325 ? 52% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 961 | 906 | 1983 | 1785 ? | 2380 ? | |
Copy Program MB/s | 753 | 614 | 792 | 388 ? | 778 ? | |
Copy Game MB/s | 896 | 539 | 1457 | 715 ? | 1716 ? | |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -8% /
-8% | -8% /
-8% | 62% /
63% | -13% /
-15% | 79% /
78% |
* ... smaller is better
Constant Performance Reading: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
ǞǞǞMX450(图灵TU117M)是第二个最强大的N18S-G5版本,除了GDDR6之外,还有64位连接和1395至1575 MHz。它的消耗量高达25瓦,这也是我们的设备需要第二个风扇的原因。
N18S-G5-B: GBD-128封装, 1395 - 1575 MHz, GDDR6 5001 MHz, 28.5 W
N18S-G5:GB2E-64封装,1395 - 1575 MHz,GDDR6 5001 MHz,25 W
N18S-G5:GB2E-64封装,1395 - 1575 MHz,GDDR5 3501 MHz,25 W
N18S-LP: GB2E-64封装,720 - 930 MHz,GDDR6 5001 MHz,12 W
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (968 - 16296, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (6341 - 9580, n=16) | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA | |
Acer Spin 3 SP313-51N-56YV | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S | |
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr |
3DMark | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Average of class Subnotebook (832 - 11887, n=60, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 | |
Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (4336 - 5753, n=17) | |
Acer Spin 3 SP313-51N-56YV | |
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S | |
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr | |
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
Average of class Subnotebook (804 - 4501, n=61, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (1086 - 2300, n=16) | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA | |
Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J | |
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S |
3DMark 11 Performance | 9244 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 4886 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 1515 points | |
Help |
游戏性能
The Witcher 3 FPS Diagram
上述 "Witcher 3 Ultra - 图形压力为 MX450"显示了GPU时钟速度是如何在最初几分钟内从1800下降到1200MHz的,因为系统试图将热量发展从近70 ºC(158ºF)降到明显低于60ºC(140ºF)。这种节流也发生在其他游戏中,正如"奇怪的旅"或"X平面11.11"也显示的那样。
因此,简而言之,虽然戴尔使用了一个强大的版本的 MX45025瓦,但它并没有被充分使用。即使是最慢的N18S-LP版本,在HP Envy 13-ba1475ng在某些方面在实际游戏中得到更好的表现("TheWitcher 3 ,"X-Plane 11.11")。
The Witcher 3 | |
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (11.2 - 71, n=51, last 2 years) | |
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (21 - 46, n=16) | |
Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA | |
Acer Spin 3 SP313-51N-56YV | |
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr | |
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 | |
Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J | |
Average of class Subnotebook (8.5 - 43.7, n=53, last 2 years) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (17.2 - 24.8, n=16) | |
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng | |
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA | |
Acer Spin 3 SP313-51N-56YV |
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 | |
Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J | |
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (34.9 - 104.6, n=20) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (13 - 99.5, n=64, last 2 years) | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA | |
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr | |
Acer Spin 3 SP313-51N-56YV |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 Standard Quality | |
Average of class Subnotebook (16.3 - 59.9, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 | |
Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (25 - 34.5, n=13) | |
Acer Spin 3 SP313-51N-56YV | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S | |
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr |
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (35.4 - 71.4, n=20) | |
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng | |
Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J | |
Average of class Subnotebook (20.7 - 97.1, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Acer Spin 3 SP313-51N-56YV | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S | |
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr |
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 high AA:high AF:8 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (19.4 - 80.9, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 | |
Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (19.2 - 46.7, n=12) | |
Acer Spin 3 SP313-51N-56YV | |
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr |
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 112 | 71 | 33 | 23 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 130 | 118 | 103 | 82.9 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 58.3 | 31.6 | ||
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 64.9 | 53.4 | 44.4 | |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 127 | 49.6 | 42.4 | 33.1 |
Emissions and Power Management
噪声排放
在空闲运行期间,双风扇是安静的。无论我们选择超性能、优化或安静模式,它们都是关闭的。我们在超性能模式下进行了性能测试,在优化模式下进行了电池测试。
在负载情况下,噪音水平最高接近48 dB(A),这可能是受选择戴尔性能模式的影响。在安静模式下,噪音量降至44,在优化模式下降至46 dB(A)。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 26 / 26 / 26 dB(A) |
Load |
| 48 / 48.3 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 26 dB(A) |
温度
在空闲运行期间,这台13英寸的笔记本电脑保持凉爽,我们测量的平均温度只有28ºC(82ºF)。在高负荷下("Witcher 3")--在GPU节流的情况下--产生的平均温度为37ºC(99ºF ),有些地方达到52ºC(126ºF)。
我们用Prime95和Furmark进行的压力测试评估了系统如何在较长的时间内处理最大负荷。在这里,表面温度将进一步增加(58ºC,顶部136ºF),在82ºC(180 ºF)的峰值之后 ,核心的温度在略高于60ºC(140ºF )的位置趋于平衡。3分钟后,封装功率在于15瓦,它只能维持2分钟的25瓦。 在压力测试后,没有立即降低性能。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 58.4 °C / 137 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 58.4 °C / 137 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.9 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 37.6 °C / 100 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.4 °C / 83.1 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-0.1 °C / -0.2 F).
发言人
这两个立体声扬声器没有什么可抱怨的。虽然由于外形尺寸小,几乎没有任何低音,但其他方面的声音是令人愉快的。你甚至可以使用这些扬声器播放视频和一些音乐,没有任何问题,而且你不一定需要耳机或外部扬声器。扬声器位于掌托下方,朝下指向桌面。双阵列麦克风可以干净地记录声音,几乎没有额外的噪音,适合会议使用。
Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
消耗功率
在空闲运行期间,功耗在3.6至10瓦之间,这对于一台具有良好TFT亮度的13英寸笔记本电脑来说是一个正常值。事实上,在压力测试期间,电源加热到58 ºC(136ºF),这表明它被过度拉伸了,也许也是英特尔处理器性能发展低于平均水平的原因。
压力测试期间的功耗显示在将近2分钟后从68瓦特下降到62瓦特。这也是时钟速度从已经很低的2400MHz进一步降低到1700MHz的时候。在"TheWitcher 3" Ultra--游戏中的最高负载--中,这种性能降低行为也发生在第2分钟。
Off / Standby | 0.5 / 0.9 Watt |
Idle | 3.6 / 5.6 / 10.1 Watt |
Load |
40.8 / 64 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Power Consumption The Witcher 3 / Stress Test
电池寿命
54瓦的电池容量保证了实际使用中10小时的电池寿命,我们在Wi-Fi测试中以150cd/m²的亮度进行了测试。扁平的锂聚合物电池被分成两块,就像最初为SATA保留的小区域,但现在可以使用了。
Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J i5-11300H, GeForce MX450, 54 Wh | HP Envy 13-ba1475ng i7-1165G7, GeForce MX450, 51 Wh | HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr R7 5800U, Vega 8, 43 Wh | Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S R7 5800U, Vega 8, 67 Wh | Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 67 Wh | Acer Spin 3 SP313-51N-56YV i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 48 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 1% | -13% | -11% | 74% | -22% | 17% | |
WiFi Websurfing | 618 | 624 1% | 539 -13% | 551 -11% | 640 4% | 483 -22% | 726 ? 17% |
1920x1080 Witcher 3 ultra 150cd | 78 | 190 144% | |||||
Battery Runtime | |||||||
Reader / Idle | 1340 | 1133 -15% | 1394 4% | 1750 ? 31% | |||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 1% /
1% | -14% /
-14% | -4% /
-4% | 74% /
74% | -22% /
-22% | 24% /
24% |
Pros
Cons
评语。一款被硬件压倒的副笔记本
制造商在这里搞了一些花架子,因为处理器和显卡无法产生根据规格表(以及我们数据库中的平均数)应该有的性能。即使这款笔记本电脑包含一个35瓦的SoC,它也没有用足35瓦。同样的情况也适用于 MX450显卡也是如此,尽管戴尔使用了带有GDDR6的25瓦版本,但它的速度很快就被扼杀了,这在游戏中成为一个缺点。
因此,我们的测试带来了一些幻觉。戴尔Inspiron 13 5310中有限的冷却装置并不是为这么大的功率而设计的,而更厚的15英寸笔记本似乎更适合Tiger Lake-H和 MX450.
同时,所有这些都是在高层次上的讨价还价。总的来说,我们看到的是一款功能适中的副笔记本,它的连接和显示效果得到了一些分数。哑光、明亮的显示屏以其准确的色彩取悦于人,而且有2个Thunderbolt 4,你准备好对接解决方案和未来的外围设备,直至外部显卡。WLAN的速度足够快,维护也很容易--尽管工作存储器是焊接的。最后,电池寿命和重量也发挥了作用,在这方面,1.3公斤(约3磅)和10小时是一个奖励。
那些在路上需要更多CPU计算能力但又不想花更多钱的人应该仔细看看AMD的机型 HPPavilion Aero 13be0097nr和华硕 ZenBook 13UM325S。
另一方面,那些不想没有MX450级别的显卡的人,目前在13英寸尺寸因素中几乎找不到更好的选择。唯一的其他选择是 HP Envy 13-ba1475ng使用慢速的12瓦MX450,15瓦的处理器,并且不提供Thunderbolt。配备iGPU的设备,如 Vega 8或Iris Xe G7 96EUs等iGPU的设备,在实际游戏中产生的性能不如25瓦的MX450(N18S-G5)所能提供的性能,即使它没有满功率运行。
价格和可用性
戴尔Inspiron 13 5310的16GB配置在,售价982美元。.
Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J
- 09/03/2021 v7 (old)
Sebastian Jentsch