Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Arc Graphics 130V

Intel Arc 130V

IntelArc Graphics 130V是一款集成图形适配器,适用于较低端的 Intel Lunar Lake处理器采用的集成图形适配器。它是 Arc 7iGPU 的直接继承者;它拥有 7 个 Xe² 架构内核,运行频率高达 1,850 MHz,并有 7 个光线追踪单元可供选择。

它完全支持 DirectX 12 Ultimate,而且 iGPU 还支持一长串流行视频编解码器的硬件解码,如 h.266 VVC、h.265 HEVC、h.264 AVC、AV1 和 VP9。它可以通过 HDMI 2.1、eDP 1.5 和 DP 2.1 同时驱动三个 SUHD 4320p 显示器。

与 Meteor Lake 一样,英特尔利用其 Foveros 技术打造 Lunar Lake 芯片,这意味着 iGPU 和 CPU 内核位于不同的芯片上,相互堆叠或相邻。

性能

根据我们内部 140V 的测试结果,我们预计 130V 的速度与 Radeon 780M在低图形设置下以 1080p 处理大多数 2023 和一些 2024 游戏的帧速率。

功耗

Lunar Lake 处理器的功耗数据相对适中,约为 20 W 至 30 W,其中最多约一半的功耗由集成 GPU 承担。

Gen13 / Xe² Series

Arc 140V 8 @ 2.05 GHz
Arc 130V 7 @ 1.85 GHz
CodenameLunar Lake iGPU
ArchitectureXe²
Pipelines7 - unified
Raytracing Cores7
Core Speed1850 (Boost) MHz
Memory TypeLPDDR5x
Max. Amount of Memory16 GB
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 12_2, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 3.0
technology3 nm
Displays3 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 2.1
FeaturesSUHD 4320p60 resolution support, AVC/HEVC/VVC/VP9/AV1 decoding
Date of Announcement24.09.2024
PredecessorArc 7-Core
CPU in Arc 130VGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Core Ultra 5 238V8 x 2100 MHz, 17 W? MHz1850 MHz
Intel Core Ultra 5 236V8 x 2100 MHz, 17 W? MHz1850 MHz
Intel Core Ultra 5 228V8 x 2100 MHz, 17 W? MHz1850 MHz
Intel Core Ultra 5 226V8 x 2100 MHz, 17 W? MHz1850 MHz
min. - max.? MHz1850 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
3.7 pt (11%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180
0.06404 -98%
...
AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
3.24 -11%
3.3 -10%
3.36 -8%
NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
3.41 -7%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
3.42 -6%
3.44 -6%
3.5 -4%
3.52 -4%
3.59 -2%
Intel Arc Graphics 130V
3.65
3.74 2%
3.74 2%
3.78 4%
3.85 5%
3.95 8%
NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
4.08 12%
4.09 12%
4.11 13%
4.21 15%
...
20.4 459%
max:
33.3 812%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
3242 Points (9%)
Intel UHD Graphics 605
113 -97%
...
2995 -8%
2998 -8%
3075 -5%
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
3094 -5%
3123 -4%
3136 -3%
3139 -3%
3197 -1%
3231 0%
Intel Arc Graphics 130V
3242
3269 1%
3324 3%
3364 4%
3430 6%
3492 8%
AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
3505 8%
3525 9%
AMD Radeon RX 5300M
3567 10%
3601 11%
...
19434 499%
max:
36259 1018%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
29655 Points (28%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
46732 Points (11%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
7529 Points (13%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
8255 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
251095 Points (28%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
9964 Points (13%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
9523 Points (8%)
171.8 -98%
...
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q
8148 -14%
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
8289 -13%
AMD Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
8323 -13%
NVIDIA Quadro P2000
8387 -12%
8553 -10%
AMD Radeon R9 M395
8656 -9%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
8781 -8%
AMD Radeon R9 M295X
8851 -7%
9448 -1%
Intel Arc Graphics 130V
9523
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M SLI
9569 0%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
9591 1%
9603 1%
AMD FirePro W7170M
9708 2%
9840 3%
9910 4%
9950 4%
10005 5%
AMD Radeon 680M
10018 5%
...
59943 529%
max:
104201 994%
0%
100%
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
41881 Points (12%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
40146 Points (22%)
ATI Radeon HD 3200
62 -100%
...
36405 -9%
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
36812 -8%
37644 -6%
38502 -4%
38910 -3%
AMD Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
39191 -2%
39213 -2%
39319 -2%
40134 0%
Intel Arc Graphics 130V
40146
40643 1%
41091 2%
NVIDIA Quadro P4000
42370 6%
42967 7%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M SLI
43525 8%
43587 9%
44188 10%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
45346 13%
45988 15%
...
132443 230%
max:
170928 326%
0%
100%
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
35970 Points (47%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
104.7 fps (34%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
122.5 fps (7%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
97.8 % (98%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
53.4 fps (10%)
3.3 -94%
...
43.21 -19%
44.4 -17%
44.86 -16%
45 -16%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
48.1 -10%
48.6 -9%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
49.5 -7%
AMD Radeon 680M
52 -3%
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
52.4 -2%
Intel Arc Graphics 130V
53.4
59.4 11%
61.4 15%
62.5 17%
62.7 17%
62.7 17%
62.8 18%
63.8 19%
64.7 21%
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
64.8 21%
...
536 904%
0%
100%
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
141.2 fps (10%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
104.6 fps (1%)
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 GPU OpenCL
25608 points (7%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
678 Samples/s (2%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
1538 Samples/s (3%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
5988 points (6%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
28.2 Watt (4%)
0510152025303540Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption 150cd *
41.6 Watt (13%)
051015202530354045Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
38.2 Watt (5%)
0510152025303540Tooltip
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1920x1080
27.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
18.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
12.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
9.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
18.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
18.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
16.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
15.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
14.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
13.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
11.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
11.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
16.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
15  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
14.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
13.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080 cinem.
8.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080 cinem.
7.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 24

F1 24

2024
low 1920x1080
66  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
56  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
41  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
13.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
11.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
9.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
22.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
20.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
17.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
13.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
17.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
13.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
25.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
22.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
16.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
15.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
33.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
25.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
23.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
22  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
med. 1920x1080
162.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
103.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
101.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
52.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
40.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
26.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
19.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1920x1080
79.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
62.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
55.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
44.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
12  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
11  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
15.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
12.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
11.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
17.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
16.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
14.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
11.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
99.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
55.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
31  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
25.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1920x1080
33  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
32  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
29  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
50.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
47.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
28.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
21.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1920x1080
33.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
26.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
23.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
23.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
30min Start Ultra Preset (FSR off) 1920x1080
20.1
low 1920x1080
29.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
24.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
20.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
18.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
176.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
70.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
58.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
48.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
73  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
41  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
37  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
33  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
38.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
31  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
27.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
73.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
38.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
28.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
94.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
85  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
76.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
72.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
141.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
120  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
44.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
120.3
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Until Dawn27.618.612.39.68
God of War Ragnarök18.718.516.215.7
Final Fantasy XVI14.713.611.711.5
Space Marine 216.41514.713.2
Star Wars Outlaws8.567.3
F1 2466564112
Senua's Saga Hellblade 213.211.79.12
Ghost of Tsushima22.520.817.813.6
Dragon's Dogma 217.613.1
Horizon Forbidden West25.522.116.315.1
Helldivers 233.425.623.522
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown162.6103.8101.5
Ready or Not52.540.826.519.9
The Finals79.662.955.344.8
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora12118.77.1
Alan Wake 215.112.611.2
Lords of the Fallen17.116.114.311.4
Total War Pharaoh99.855.53125.4
Assassin's Creed Mirage333229
Counter-Strike 250.747.128.321.4
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty33.626.223.523.1
Baldur's Gate 329.924.720.318.6
Strange Brigade176.470.758.348.2
Far Cry 573413733
X-Plane 11.1138.43127.1
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark73.438.128.3
Dota 2 Reborn94.28576.872.6
GTA V141.912044.221.1
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
13
6
6
2
14
8
3
2
19
6
2
16
3
2






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.28
log 16. 10:38:17

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 05:32:18 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.042s ... 0.043s

#5 composed specs +0.001s ... 0.044s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.044s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.044s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12695 +0.029s ... 0.073s

#9 got single benchmarks 12695 +0.012s ... 0.085s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.085s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.555s ... 0.64s

#12 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.64s

#13 Got 102 rows for game benchmarks. +0.014s ... 0.655s

#14 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.655s

#15 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.017s ... 0.671s

#16 benchmarks composed for output. +0.95s ... 1.621s

#17 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.003s ... 1.624s

#18 return log +0s ... 1.624s

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile

Class 2

M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Radeon RX 5700M *
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Quadro P5200
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q *
Quadro P4200
Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Quadro P4000
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q *
Radeon Pro WX 7100 *
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *

Class 3

Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *
Vega M GH
Quadro M5000M
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro M4000M
T500 Laptop GPU *
Radeon R9 M395X
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q *
Radeon Pro Vega 16
WX Vega M GL
Radeon R9 M485X
Quadro M3000M
FirePro W7170M
Radeon R9 M395
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q *
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Radeon R9 M390
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Radeon Pro 460
Radeon Pro WX 4130 *
GeForce GTX 960M
Quadro P620 *
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 455
Quadro P600
Quadro M2000M
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
GeForce GTX 950M
Radeon Pro 450
Radeon 630
Radeon 540X *
Radeon R9 M385X
Quadro P520
Quadro M1000M
GeForce 945M
Quadro P500 *
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
Vega 10 *
Iris Pro Graphics 580
FirePro W5170M *
Radeon R9 M370X
Vega 9
FirePro W5130M
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 730
Vega 7
Radeon R7 M465
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Vega 8
GeForce 940M
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Quadro M600M
FirePro W4190M
Radeon R9 M375
Radeon R7 M445
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Iris Graphics 550
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Iris Graphics 540
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
Radeon R7 M360
GeForce 920M
Radeon 620
Radeon R7 M340
Radeon 610
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
HD Graphics 530
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
Radeon R5 M330
GeForce 910M
HD Graphics 520

Class 4

Radeon R5 M320 *
Radeon R5 M315 *
Radeon R5 M420 *
Vega 2 *
UHD Graphics 617
UHD Graphics 615
HD Graphics 515
UHD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 510
UHD Graphics 605
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
VideoCore VII *
UHD Graphics 600
HD Graphics (Braswell)

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter