Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Arc Graphics 130V

Intel Arc 130V

IntelArc Graphics 130V是一款集成图形适配器，适用于较低端的 Intel Lunar Lake处理器采用的集成图形适配器。它是 Arc 7iGPU 的直接继承者；它拥有 7 个 Xe² 架构内核，运行频率高达 1,850 MHz，并有 7 个光线追踪单元可供选择。

它完全支持 DirectX 12 Ultimate，而且 iGPU 还支持一长串流行视频编解码器的硬件解码，如 h.266 VVC、h.265 HEVC、h.264 AVC、AV1 和 VP9。它可以通过 HDMI 2.1、eDP 1.5 和 DP 2.1 同时驱动三个 SUHD 4320p 显示器。

与 Meteor Lake 一样，英特尔利用其 Foveros 技术打造 Lunar Lake 芯片，这意味着 iGPU 和 CPU 内核位于不同的芯片上，相互堆叠或相邻。

性能

根据我们内部 140V 的测试结果，我们预计 130V 的速度与 Radeon 780M在低图形设置下以 1080p 处理大多数 2023 和一些 2024 游戏的帧速率。

功耗

Lunar Lake 处理器的功耗数据相对适中，约为 20 W 至 30 W，其中最多约一半的功耗由集成 GPU 承担。

Gen13 / Xe² Series

Arc 140V 8 @ 2.05 GHz
Arc 130V 7 @ 1.85 GHz
CodenameLunar Lake iGPU
ArchitectureXe²
Pipelines7 - unified
Raytracing Cores7
Core Speed1850 (Boost) MHz
Memory TypeLPDDR5x
Max. Amount of Memory16 GB
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 12_2, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 3.0
technology3 nm
Displays3 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 2.1
FeaturesSUHD 4320p60 resolution support, AVC/HEVC/VVC/VP9/AV1 decoding
Date of Announcement24.09.2024
PredecessorArc 7-Core
CPU in Arc 130VGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Core Ultra 5 238V8 x 2100 MHz, 17 W? MHz1850 MHz
Intel Core Ultra 5 236V8 x 2100 MHz, 17 W? MHz1850 MHz
Intel Core Ultra 5 228V8 x 2100 MHz, 17 W? MHz1850 MHz
Intel Core Ultra 5 226V8 x 2100 MHz, 17 W? MHz1850 MHz
min. - max.? MHz1850 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
3.7 pt (11%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180
0.06404 -98%
...
AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
3.24 -11%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
3.3 -10%
NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU
3.36 -8%
NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
3.41 -7%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
3.42 -6%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
3.44 -6%
NVIDIA T600 Laptop GPU
3.5 -4%
AMD Radeon 780M
3.52 -4%
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU
3.59 -2%
Intel Arc Graphics 130V
3.65
NVIDIA GeForce MX570
3.74 2%
Intel Arc A310
3.74 2%
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
3.77 3%
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)
3.85 5%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
3.96 8%
NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
4.08 12%
NVIDIA Quadro P3000
4.09 12%
AMD Radeon 880M
4.11 13%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
4.11 13%
...
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
20.4 459%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
33.3 812%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 3451     avg: 3545     median: 3532 (10%)     max: 3652 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 3182     avg: 3259     median: 3242 (9%)     max: 3352 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Intel UHD Graphics 605
113 -97%
...
NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU
2995 -8%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
2998 -8%
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU
3075 -6%
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
3094 -5%
AMD Radeon 880M
3110 -5%
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)
3123 -4%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
3139 -4%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
3155 -3%
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
3224 -1%
Intel Arc Graphics 130V
3259
Intel Arc A310
3269 0%
NVIDIA GeForce MX570
3306 1%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
3324 2%
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
3364 3%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
3430 5%
NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU
3492 7%
AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
3505 8%
AMD Radeon 890M
3526 8%
AMD Radeon RX 5300M
3567 9%
...
AMD Radeon RX 7900M
19434 496%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
36259 1013%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
29655 Points (28%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
46732 Points (11%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 6913     avg: 7436     median: 7529 (13%)     max: 7866 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 7536     avg: 8096     median: 8255 (9%)     max: 8497 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
251095 Points (28%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 8815     avg: 9644     median: 9964 (13%)     max: 10154 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 8129     avg: 9087     median: 9523 (8%)     max: 9610 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
AMD Radeon HD 6250
171.8 -98%
...
Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics
8133 -10%
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q
8148 -10%
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
8289 -9%
AMD Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
8323 -8%
NVIDIA Quadro P2000
8387 -8%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
8553 -6%
AMD Radeon R9 M395
8656 -5%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
8781 -3%
AMD Radeon R9 M295X
8851 -3%
Intel Arc Graphics 130V
9087
AMD Radeon R9 M390X
9448 4%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M SLI
9569 5%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
9591 6%
AMD Radeon 760M
9603 6%
AMD FirePro W7170M
9708 7%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M SLI
9840 8%
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
9910 9%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
9950 9%
NVIDIA GeForce MX550
10005 10%
...
AMD Radeon RX 7900M
59943 560%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
104201 1047%
0%
100%
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
41881 Points (12%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
40146 Points (22%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
ATI Radeon HD 3200
62 -100%
...
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
36812 -8%
AMD Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
37644 -6%
AMD Radeon 890M
37785 -6%
Intel Arc Graphics 140V
38502 -4%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
38910 -3%
AMD Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
39191 -2%
Intel Arc A310
39213 -2%
NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU
39319 -2%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
40134 0%
Intel Arc Graphics 130V
40146
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
40643 1%
NVIDIA Quadro P4000
42370 6%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M SLI
42967 7%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M SLI
43525 8%
NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU
43587 9%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M SLI
44188 10%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
45346 13%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
45988 15%
NVIDIA Quadro P3200
46624 16%
...
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
132443 230%
max:
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX
170928 326%
0%
100%
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
35970 Points (47%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
16874 points (12%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
104.7 fps (34%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 122.5     avg: 133.7     median: 139 (8%)     max: 139.6 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
97.8 % (98%)
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
23.5 fps (10%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
53.4 fps (10%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)
3.3 -94%
...
NVIDIA GeForce MX450
44.4 -17%
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
44.86 -16%
AMD Radeon RX 7600S
45 -16%
Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
45.07 -16%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
48.1 -10%
AMD Radeon 760M
48.6 -9%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
49.5 -7%
AMD Radeon 680M
52 -3%
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
52.4 -2%
Intel Arc Graphics 130V
53.4
AMD Radeon 780M
59.8 12%
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
61.4 15%
Intel Arc Graphics 140V
62.5 17%
NVIDIA T600 Laptop GPU
62.7 17%
NVIDIA GeForce MX550
62.7 17%
Intel Arc A350M
62.8 18%
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
63.8 19%
NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU
64.7 21%
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
64.8 21%
...
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
536 904%
0%
100%
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
141.2 fps (10%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 104.6     avg: 244.9     median: 315 (8%)     max: 315 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 GPU OpenCL
min: 23879     avg: 24953     median: 25372 (7%)     max: 25608 points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 GPU Vulkan
min: 19700     avg: 27220     median: 27529 (8%)     max: 34432 points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
678 Samples/s (2%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
1538 Samples/s (3%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
5988 points (6%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 28.2     avg: 31.4     median: 30.7 (4%)     max: 35.4 Watt
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
05101520253035404550Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 41.6     avg: 43.1     median: 43 (14%)     max: 44.6 Watt
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
051015202530354045Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 38.2     avg: 41     median: 41.9 (5%)     max: 42.8 Watt
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
051015202530354045Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cyberpunk 2077 ultra
min: 0.4797     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (73%)     max: 0.526 fps per Watt
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Until Dawn

Until Dawn

2024
low 1920x1080
27.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
18.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
12.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
9.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
God of War Ragnarök

God of War Ragnarök

2024
low 1920x1080
18.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
18.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
16.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
15.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Final Fantasy XVI

Final Fantasy XVI

2024
low 1920x1080
14.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
13.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
11.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
11.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Space Marine 2

Space Marine 2

2024
low 1920x1080
16.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
15  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
14.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
13.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Star Wars Outlaws

Star Wars Outlaws

2024
low 1920x1080 cinem.
8.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080 cinem.
7.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 24

F1 24

2024
low 1920x1080
66  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
56  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
41  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Senua's Saga Hellblade 2

Senua's Saga Hellblade 2

2024
low 1920x1080
13.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
11.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
9.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Ghost of Tsushima

Ghost of Tsushima

2024
low 1920x1080
22.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
20.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
17.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
13.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Dragon's Dogma 2

Dragon's Dogma 2

2024
low 1920x1080
17.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
13.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Horizon Forbidden West

Horizon Forbidden West

2024
low 1920x1080
25.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
22.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
16.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
15.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Helldivers 2

Helldivers 2

2024
low 1920x1080
33.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
25.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
23.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
22  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown

Prince of Persia The Lost Crown

2024
med. 1920x1080
162.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
103.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
101.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Ready or Not

Ready or Not

2023
low 1920x1080
52.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
40.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
26.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
19.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
The Finals

The Finals

2023
low 1920x1080
79.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
62.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
55.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
44.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora

Avatar Frontiers of Pandora

2023
low 1920x1080
12  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
11  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Alan Wake 2

Alan Wake 2

2023
low 1920x1080
15.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
12.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
11.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Lords of the Fallen

Lords of the Fallen

2023
low 1920x1080
17.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
16.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
14.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
11.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Total War Pharaoh

Total War Pharaoh

2023
low 1920x1080
99.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
55.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
31  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
25.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Assassin's Creed Mirage

Assassin's Creed Mirage

2023
low 1920x1080
33  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
32  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
29  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

2023
low 1920x1080
50.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
47.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
28.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
21.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty

Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty

2023
low 1920x1080
33.6 41.2 41.6 ~ 39 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
26.2 31.3 31.9 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
23.5 27.8 28.6 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
23.1 24.9 25.1 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
30min Start Ultra Preset (FSR off) 1920x1080
20.1
21.7
20.1
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

2023
low 1920x1080
29.9 29.9 31.7 ~ 31 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
23.9 24.7 25 ~ 25 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
20.3 20.8 21.5 ~ 21 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
18.6 20.4 21.3 ~ 20 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
176.4 192.6 192.9 ~ 187 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
70.7 73.6 73.8 ~ 73 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
58.3 60.3 61.5 ~ 60 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
48.2 50.6 51.8 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
73  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
41  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
37  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
33  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
X-Plane 11.11

X-Plane 11.11

2018
low 1280x720
38.4 39.7 44.5 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
31 32.6 36.7 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
27.1 27.7 32.8 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark

2018
low 1280x720
73.4 73.4 75.2 ~ 74 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
38.1 40.8 42.4 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
27.9 28.3 29.2 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Dota 2 Reborn

Dota 2 Reborn

2015
low 1280x720
91.2 94.2 100.3 ~ 95 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
84.1 84.4 85 ~ 85 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
75.8 76.8 78.6 ~ 77 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
72.6 78.1 78.1 ~ 76 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
141.9 151.5 153 ~ 149 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
120 131.1 132.4 ~ 128 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
44.2 60.2 62.8 ~ 56 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
20.8 21.1 23.9 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
120.3
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Until Dawn27.618.612.39.68
God of War Ragnarök18.718.516.215.7
Final Fantasy XVI14.713.611.711.5
Space Marine 216.41514.713.2
Star Wars Outlaws8.567.3
F1 2466564112
Senua's Saga Hellblade 213.211.79.12
Ghost of Tsushima22.520.817.813.6
Dragon's Dogma 217.613.1
Horizon Forbidden West25.522.116.315.1
Helldivers 233.425.623.522
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown162.6103.8101.5
Ready or Not52.540.826.519.9
The Finals79.662.955.344.8
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora12118.77.1
Alan Wake 215.112.611.2
Lords of the Fallen17.116.114.311.4
Total War Pharaoh99.855.53125.4
Assassin's Creed Mirage333229
Counter-Strike 250.747.128.321.4
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty39302724
Baldur's Gate 331252120
Strange Brigade187736050
Far Cry 573413733
X-Plane 11.11413329
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark744028
Dota 2 Reborn95857776
GTA V1491285622
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps		12
7
6
2		13
9
3
2		19
5
3
16
3
2






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.28
log 16. 20:16:51

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 05:34:58 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.03s ... 0.031s

#5 composed specs +0.001s ... 0.032s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.032s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.032s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12695 +0.027s ... 0.059s

#9 got single benchmarks 12695 +0.015s ... 0.074s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.074s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.559s ... 0.633s

#12 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.633s

#13 Got 154 rows for game benchmarks. +0.032s ... 0.665s

#14 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.665s

#15 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.018s ... 0.683s

#16 benchmarks composed for output. +0.928s ... 1.611s

#17 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.004s ... 1.614s

#18 return log +0s ... 1.614s

Notebook reviews with Intel Arc Graphics 130V graphics card

华硕 Vivobook S 14 OLED 评测

华硕 Vivobook S 14 OLED 评测：得益于月亮湖技术，价格实惠、更安静、更持久

除了 AMD 机型，华硕现在还推出了配备最新英特尔 Lunar Lake 处理器的小巧 Vivobook S 14 OLED。由于包括 60 Hz FHD OLED 面板在内的其他组件在这两款机型中都是通用的，因此我们在评测中将重点关注这两款机型的性能和风扇表现。...
Intel Core Ultra 5 226V | Intel Arc Graphics 130V | 14.00" | 1.3 kg
三星Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 笔记本电脑评测--得益于英特尔月亮湖技术的大型 OLED 可转换笔记本电脑

三星Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 笔记本电脑评测--得益于英特尔月亮湖技术的大型 OLED 可转换笔记本电脑

三星（Samsung）为其大型 16 英寸Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 敞篷版配备了英特尔最新的 Lunar Lake 处理器，具有诸多优势。除此之外，该设备还拥有纤薄的外壳和令人印象深刻的 120-Hz AMOLED 显示屏。...
Intel Core Ultra 5 226V | Intel Arc Graphics 130V | 16.00" | 1.7 kg
宏碁 Swift 14 AI 评测：首款配备 Arc Graphics 130V 的笔记本电脑

宏碁 Swift 14 AI 评测：首款配备 Arc Graphics 130V 的笔记本电脑

宏碁的 Swift 14 AI 是一款小巧轻便的多媒体笔记本电脑，采用了英特尔全新且相当高效的 Lunar Lake 架构。我们尚未测试的 Arc Graphics 130V iGPU 不得不在基准测试中与 140V 及其前代产品竞争。...
Intel Core Ultra 5 226V | Intel Arc Graphics 130V | 14.00" | 1.3 kg

Asus Vivobook S14 Q423: Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook S14 Q423

Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU: Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU

Asus ZenBook S14 OLED UX5406SA: Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Asus ZenBook S14 OLED UX5406SA

Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA: Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, 14.00", 1.3 kg
   » 华硕 Vivobook S 16 (S5606CA) 发布，配备最新英特尔酷睿 Ultra 200H Arrow Lake 移动 CPU 和 Lumina OLED 显示屏

   » 华硕 Vivobook S 16 (M506KA) 和 Vivobook S 14 (M5406WA) 首次亮相，配备全新 AMD Krackan Point APU 和 OLED 显示屏

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon RX 6800S
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop *
Radeon RX 7600M XT *
Radeon RX 7700S *
M3 Max 40-Core GPU *
M2 Max 38-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
Radeon RX 6700M
Radeon RX 8060S *
M3 Max 30-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 7600M *
M4 Max 32-Core GPU *
M2 Max 30-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
Radeon RX 7600S
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
A770M *
Radeon RX 6650M XT *
M3 Pro 18-Core GPU *
M2 Pro 19-Core GPU *
Radeon RX 6650M
Radeon RX 6600M
Radeon RX 6700S
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Radeon RX 8050S *
Radeon RX 5700M *
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
M3 Pro 14-Core GPU *
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU *
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q *
Radeon RX 6600S *
Quadro P5200
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) *
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop *
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q *
Quadro P4200
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
Nvidia RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
A730M *
Radeon RX 8040S *
Radeon Pro 5600M *
Radeon RX 5600M
Quadro P5000
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU
A570M *
RTX A1000 Laptop GPU
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
Arc 140T *
A550M *
Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
Radeon 890M *
Arc 130T *
GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
A530M *
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
RTX A500 Laptop GPU
Radeon RX 6550M *
Radeon RX 6500M
Radeon RX 6550S *
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Quadro M5500
Quadro P4000
Quadro T2000 (Laptop) *
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
A370M *
Radeon RX 5500M
Radeon Pro 5500M *
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 6450M *
Arc 8-Core *
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
Arc 140V *
GeForce MX570 *
Radeon RX 6300M *
Arc 130V *
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q *
Quadro T1000 (Laptop) *
Radeon Pro WX 7100 *
Arc 7-Core *
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *

Class 3

M4 8-Core GPU *
Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) *
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q *
T1200 Laptop GPU *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *
A310 *
A350M *
T600 Laptop GPU *
T550 Laptop GPU *
GeForce GTX 980M
Vega M GH
Quadro M5000M
Radeon Pro Vega 20
Radeon 880M *
Adreno 830 *
Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS *
Radeon 780M *
GeForce MX550
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro M4000M
GeForce GTX 970M
T500 Laptop GPU *
GeForce MX450 *
Radeon R9 M395X
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q *
Radeon Pro Vega 16
Vega M GL / 870
WX Vega M GL
Radeon R9 M485X
Quadro M3000M
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
FirePro W7170M
Radeon R9 M395
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q *
Radeon 760M *
Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS *
Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
GeForce GTX 965M
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Quadro M2200
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Radeon R9 M390
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Radeon Pro 460
Radeon Pro WX 4130 *
Iris Xe G7 96EUs
GeForce MX350
GeForce GTX 960M
Quadro M1200
Quadro P620 *
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 550 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 640
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 455
Quadro P600
GeForce MX250
GeForce MX330
GeForce MX150
Arc Graphics 3-core (Arrow Lake) *
Iris Xe G7 80EUs
Graphics 4-Core *
Quadro M2000M
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon RX 540 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
Arc Graphics 2-core (Arrow Lake) *
GeForce GTX 950M
Radeon Pro 450
Adreno X1-45 2.1 TFLOPS *
Radeon 630
Radeon 540X *
Radeon R9 M470X *
Radeon R9 M385X
Quadro P520
Quadro M1000M
Quadro M620 *
GeForce 945M
Quadro P500 *
UHD Graphics 64EUs
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
Vega 10 *
Iris Pro Graphics P580
Iris Pro Graphics 580
Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS *
Radeon R9 M470 *
FirePro W5170M *
Radeon R9 M370X
Vega 9
FirePro W5130M
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 750
Radeon 740M *
UHD Graphics 730
GeForce MX230
Vega 8 *
Vega 7
Radeon R7 M465
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
GeForce MX130
GeForce 940MX
Quadro M520
Vega 8
GeForce 940M
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
GeForce 930MX
Quadro M600M
FirePro W4190M
Radeon R9 M375
Iris Plus Graphics 655
Radeon R7 M445
Quadro M500M
Iris Plus Graphics 650
GeForce 930M
Iris Graphics 550
Radeon 530
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
Iris Plus Graphics 645
GeForce MX110 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
GeForce 920MX
Iris Graphics 540
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) *
Radeon R7 M460 *
Radeon R7 M360
GeForce 920M
Radeon R8 M445DX
Radeon 620
Radeon R7 M440
Radeon R7 M340
Radeon 520
Radeon 610
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
Vega 5 *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
HD Graphics 530
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
UHD Graphics 620
HD Graphics 620
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
Radeon R5 M330
Radeon R5 M430
Vega 3 *
GeForce 910M
HD Graphics 520
Iris Graphics 6100

Class 4

Radeon R5 M320 *
Radeon R5 M315 *
Radeon R5 M420 *
Vega 2 *
Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)
HD Graphics 6000
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) *
UHD Graphics 617
UHD Graphics 615
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) *
HD Graphics 615
HD Graphics 515
UHD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 510
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
UHD Graphics 605
HD Graphics 505
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
VideoCore VII *
UHD Graphics 600
HD Graphics 500
HD Graphics 405 (Braswell)
HD Graphics (Braswell)
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter