微星Katana 17 B13V笔记本电脑回顾。NvidiaGeForce RTX 4060首次亮相
5499美元。这就是潜在的买家必须掏钱购买的 微星泰坦GT77.一方面,你得到了极致的动力,但没有多少人愿意花这么多钱买一台笔记本电脑。微星Katana 17 B13VFK通过一些边角料,表明便宜的也能用。有了猛禽湖的CPU和 NvidiaGeForce RTX 4060这款游戏笔记本(目前在亚马逊和百思买上无法买到)在德国可以买到,价格约为1999欧元。仍然是一大笔钱,但大约便宜了三分之二。在我们广泛的审查中,我们揭示了性能是否也受到类似的打击。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
82.1 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2023 | MSI Katana 17 B13VFK i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 2.8 kg | 25.2 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
89 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2023 | MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | 3.5 kg | 23 mm | 17.30" | 3840x2160 | |
83.2 % v7 (old) | 01 / 2023 | MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | 2.6 kg | 24.2 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
83.3 % v7 (old) | 01 / 2023 | Gigabyte G7 KE i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | 2.6 kg | 25 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
86.9 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2022 | Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.9 kg | 28.3 mm | 17.30" | 2560x1440 | |
86.5 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2022 | Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | 3 kg | 27.65 mm | 17.30" | 2560x1440 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳。哑光的灰色微星火箭
微星给了Katana 17一个典型的游戏外观。设计语言很难说是朴素的,但这一点并不适用于笔记本电脑的颜色:微星的整体是深灰色。虽然,这只是在设备关闭时的情况。激活彩色背光键盘后,从颜色上看,微星也看起来像一台游戏笔记本电脑。
从外部来看,至少,这台笔记本电脑是由塑料制成的。掌托和盖子摸起来很光滑,而设备的底座则有些粗糙。它不一定是最高质量的,但它还是达到了它的目的。当施加轻度压力时,掌托是牢固的,但当施加额外压力时,它在中间会有一点弯曲。显示屏的盖子可以稍微扭转,不像底座那样完全不能扭转。对于一台大部分时间都在桌子上的笔记本电脑来说,这应该是没有问题的。
大铰链使设备可以打开到180度的角度,显示盖可以用一只手打开。
从重量上讲,与同行相比,微星Katana 17处于中间位置。作为回报,它拥有相对紧凑的尺寸。
特点。USB2.0而不是Thunderbolt
端口的范围还有很多需要改进的地方。USB 2.0在2022年没有地位,Thunderbolt也没有出现在微星Katana 17上。此外,我们怀念没有SD卡读卡器,但至少微星没有吝惜RJ45端口。
沟通
在Katana 17 B13V上,微星选择了英特尔的WiFi解决方案,尽管它没有最新的技术。英特尔AX201提供了高而稳定的传输速率,尽管它没有较新的WiFI 6E标准。
网络摄像头
720p的网络摄像头提供了一个典型的笔记本电脑图片:嘈杂、冲淡和缺乏清晰度。
辅料
开箱后,微星Katana 17 B13V配备了一个来自Chicony的240瓦的电源装置,该装置使用一个专有的连接器。
维护
13个螺丝和几个夹子阻碍了进入Katana内部的途径。WiFi模块、M.2 2280固态硬盘以及两个内存模块都可以被升级。此外,你可以接触到大型的双风扇冷却系统和电池,对于这种尺寸的设备来说,电池是相当小的。电池旁边有很多空闲的空间,这表明一个更大的电池是可能的。有趣的是,底板上有一个重量,使微星笔记本电脑看起来更重--可能是由于大的自由空间。
担保
微星笔记本电脑自购买之日起有2年的保修期,其中包括提货和退货服务。然而,制造商的保证只适用于德国。
输入设备。良好的键盘,奇怪的布局
键盘
首先是积极的一面。这款小键盘配备了多级RGB背光(四区,可配置),并且按照今天的标准,提供了非常宽松的1.7毫米的键程。微星为Katana 17 B13V选择了一个非常好的键盘。打字体验非常好,WASD键的突出显示很适合游戏设计--相对大的方向键也是如此。
然而,很难理解为什么微星没有采用全宽的键盘。一些按键比正常的更小,尤其是数字键盘很小。总的来说,我们面对的是一个非常不寻常和尴尬的键盘布局。FN键位于一个荒谬的位置,右移键相当小,而且,最重要的是,它是一个ANSI布局,有一个狭窄的回车键,意味着#键被移位。对于全球市场来说,这不是一个问题,但在德国却非常不寻常。
触摸板
微星Katana 17的触摸板尺寸为10.5 x 6.5厘米--以现在的标准来看太小了,而且与设备的尺寸也有关系。对于我们的口味来说,塑料表面可以更光滑一点,而且感觉不是很高级。至少这并不适用于点击机制。点击垫提供了一个均匀的点击和高质量的感觉。在软件实现方面没有什么可抱怨的,而且,在这方面,它是现代Windows笔记本电脑中典型的那种触摸板。
微星Katana 17的显示屏是其最薄弱的环节
对于Katana 17 B13V,微星只提供一个显示屏选项,它是一个17.3英寸,哑光,16:9格式,IPS液晶屏。唯一可用的分辨率是1920 x 1080,换句话说,全高清。对于这种尺寸的显示器来说,这是一个相对较低的分辨率--尽管至少它是一个144Hz的显示器。
不幸的是,友达光电的面板质量还有待提高。在256cd/m²左右,显示亮度落后于竞争对手。对于游戏笔记本来说,响应时间也很差。
|
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 267 cd/m²
Contrast: 1271:1 (Black: 0.21 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 4.5
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
42.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
61% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
40.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.12
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK B173HAN04.9, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 17.3" | MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI B173ZAN06.C, Mini-LED, 3840x2160, 17.3" | MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK Sharp LQ173M1JW08, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Gigabyte G7 KE AU Optronics B173HAN05.1, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W NE173QHM-NZ2, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3" | Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) BOE0A1A, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 105% | 72% | 69% | 101% | 101% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 40.8 | 94.9 133% | 71.9 76% | 70.4 73% | 97.1 138% | 96.8 137% |
sRGB Coverage | 61 | 99.9 64% | 99.9 64% | 99.8 64% | 99.9 64% | 99.9 64% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 42.2 | 92.4 119% | 73.7 75% | 71.7 70% | 84.8 101% | 84.8 101% |
Response Times | -9% | 72% | 77% | 72% | 54% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 33 ? | 38.4 ? -16% | 4.6 ? 86% | 5 ? 85% | 5.7 ? 83% | 16.4 ? 50% |
Response Time Black / White * | 26 ? | 26.6 ? -2% | 11.2 ? 57% | 8.3 ? 68% | 10.1 ? 61% | 11.2 ? 57% |
PWM Frequency | 2380 ? | |||||
Screen | 52982% | -21% | 27% | 21% | 4% | |
Brightness middle | 267 | 606 127% | 337.7 26% | 307 15% | 320 20% | 366 37% |
Brightness | 256 | 602 135% | 331 29% | 301 18% | 303 18% | 340 33% |
Brightness Distribution | 93 | 93 0% | 82 -12% | 93 0% | 87 -6% | 85 -9% |
Black Level * | 0.21 | 0.0001 100% | 0.31 -48% | 0.2 5% | 0.3 -43% | 0.31 -48% |
Contrast | 1271 | 6060000 476690% | 1089 -14% | 1535 21% | 1067 -16% | 1181 -7% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.7 | 4.8 -2% | 4.12 12% | 1.32 72% | 1.1 77% | 3.56 24% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 20.4 | 8.2 60% | 8.89 56% | 4.6 77% | 2.7 87% | 5.66 72% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.5 | 1.8 60% | 0.98 78% | 1.03 77% | 3.31 26% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.5 | 6.5 -333% | 6.3 -320% | 2.1 -40% | 1.1 27% | 2.84 -89% |
Gamma | 2.12 104% | 2.63 84% | 2.48 89% | 2.247 98% | 2.13 103% | 2.29 96% |
CCT | 6552 99% | 6596 99% | 6542 99% | 6815 95% | 6599 98% | 6835 95% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 17693% /
34081% | 41% /
12% | 58% /
43% | 65% /
47% | 53% /
32% |
* ... smaller is better
在色彩表现方面,显示器的不太积极的印象继续存在。即使在校准之后,该面板离显示准确的颜色还有一段距离。在用i1Profiler和X-Rite i1Pro 2校准后,DeltaE-Wert仅从4.7降至4.5,降幅很小。
造成这种情况的原因可能是缺乏色彩空间的覆盖。如今,只有61%的sRGB色彩空间是一个令人不满意的结果--特别是对于一个面向媒体消费的笔记本电脑。
在户外,只要设备在阴凉处使用,微星Katana 17显示屏就可以使用。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13 ms rise | |
↘ 13 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 59 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
33 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16 ms rise | |
↘ 17 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 40 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
性能。NvidiaGeForce RTX 4060的首次亮相
在德国,微星以两种配置销售Katana 17 B13V。两种设备都有英特尔酷睿i7-13620H,NvidiaGeForce RTX 4060以及16GB DDR5 5200内存的共同点。唯一的区别是。一个型号有512GB的SSD,另一个型号的SSD容量为1TB。
测试条件
在微星的软件 "MSI中心 "中,有四种性能模式。最大性能、平衡、静音模式以及超级电池。此外,还有一个自动模式。我们使用最大性能模式进行了所有的测试,其中CPU消耗在70至80瓦之间波动。在平衡模式下,性能储备相似,这被用于电池测试。在静音和超级电池模式下,CPU分别被限制在30瓦和15瓦。
由于有了Optimus Advanced,它可以将图形芯片切换到纯粹的Nvidia操作,并停用英特尔GPU。我们使用正常的Optimus模式测试了该设备。
处理器
ǞǞǞ英特尔酷睿i7-13620H是猛禽湖H系列的入门级i7型号。它拥有所有六个性能核心,但只有四个较小的E核心。作为H型CPU,它的典型TDP为45瓦,尽管这可能有很大差异,取决于笔记本电脑。所有10个核心(16个线程)的时钟频率从1.8到4.9GHz不等。你可以在我们的《CPU列表》中找到与其他处理器的更多比较。 CPU列表.
微星授予该处理器最大80瓦的功率。由此产生的性能介于 i7-12700H在MSI Pulse GL76和i5-12500H中发现的技嘉G7 KE.鉴于桤木湖和猛禽湖之间的规格和小差异,这些结果是可以预期的。凭借其8个P-cores和16个E-cores, 英特尔酷睿i9-13950HX明显领先。
在电池模式下,CPU的性能受到了严重的限制。总分1399分,Cinebench R15的结果约低40%。
Cinebench R15 Multi Continuous Test
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Average Intel Core i7-13620H | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Gigabyte G7 KE |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Average of class Gaming (5668 - 36249, n=188, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Average Intel Core i7-13620H (10819 - 15496, n=5) | |
Gigabyte G7 KE |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Average of class Gaming (1136 - 2235, n=186, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13620H (1805 - 1871, n=5) | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
Gigabyte G7 KE |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=186, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13620H (4214 - 5905, n=5) | |
Gigabyte G7 KE |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Average of class Gaming (439 - 856, n=186, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13620H (693 - 719, n=5) | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
Gigabyte G7 KE |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=193, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Average Intel Core i7-13620H (1681 - 2492, n=5) | |
Gigabyte G7 KE |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Average of class Gaming (191.9 - 318, n=190, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Average Intel Core i7-13620H (258 - 269, n=5) | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Gigabyte G7 KE |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Average Intel Core i7-13620H (215 - 289, n=5) | |
Gigabyte G7 KE | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Average of class Gaming (87 - 555, n=181, last 2 years) | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Average of class Gaming (23795 - 140932, n=185, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Average Intel Core i7-13620H (45983 - 62324, n=5) | |
Gigabyte G7 KE |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Average of class Gaming (4199 - 7581, n=185, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Average Intel Core i7-13620H (5742 - 6326, n=5) | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
Gigabyte G7 KE |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 23194, n=186, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Average Intel Core i7-13620H (8357 - 12223, n=5) | |
Gigabyte G7 KE |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2210, n=186, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Average Intel Core i7-13620H (1793 - 1865, n=5) | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Gigabyte G7 KE | |
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Average of class Gaming (6.72 - 38.9, n=185, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Gigabyte G7 KE | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13620H (12.9 - 17.7, n=5) |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Average Intel Core i7-13620H (41.5 - 56.8, n=5) | |
Average of class Gaming (31.4 - 96.6, n=182, last 2 years) | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
Gigabyte G7 KE | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Gigabyte G7 KE | |
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13620H (0.4438 - 0.4509, n=5) | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.759, n=186, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
Gigabyte G7 KE | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Average Intel Core i7-13620H |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Average of class Gaming (4986 - 60169, n=182, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Gigabyte G7 KE | |
Average Intel Core i7-13620H (10779 - 13601, n=5) |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Average of class Gaming (25360 - 252486, n=182, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Gigabyte G7 KE | |
Average Intel Core i7-13620H (54287 - 67187, n=5) |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Average of class Gaming (1339 - 10389, n=182, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
Gigabyte G7 KE | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Average Intel Core i7-13620H (2357 - 2773, n=5) |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=182, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Gigabyte G7 KE | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Average Intel Core i7-13620H (66885 - 78867, n=5) |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Average of class Gaming (4800 - 32988, n=182, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Average Intel Core i7-13620H (6737 - 8421, n=5) | |
Gigabyte G7 KE |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Average of class Gaming (12321 - 134044, n=182, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Gigabyte G7 KE | |
Average Intel Core i7-13620H (27242 - 32787, n=5) |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Gigabyte G7 KE | |
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=182, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13620H (52697 - 85895, n=5) | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Average of class Gaming (373 - 2409, n=182, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
Gigabyte G7 KE | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Average Intel Core i7-13620H (697 - 835, n=5) |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Average of class Gaming (2540 - 31796, n=182, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Gigabyte G7 KE | |
Average Intel Core i7-13620H (6077 - 7364, n=5) |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=183, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Average Intel Core i7-13620H (22766 - 34544, n=5) | |
Gigabyte G7 KE | |
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK |
系统性能
快速的固态硬盘与Katana 17强大的图形芯片相搭配,带来了非常好的系统性能,当然,在合成基准测试中有些落后于配置更好的竞争对手。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=164, last 2 years) | |
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Average Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (6678 - 7256, n=3) | |
Gigabyte G7 KE |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12334, n=163, last 2 years) | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (9909 - 10809, n=3) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Gigabyte G7 KE |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=163, last 2 years) | |
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Average Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (8642 - 9781, n=3) | |
Gigabyte G7 KE |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Average of class Gaming (6703 - 18475, n=163, last 2 years) | |
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Average Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (9437 - 10204, n=3) | |
Gigabyte G7 KE |
CrossMark / Overall | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Average Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (1857 - 1986, n=3) | |
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=147, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
Gigabyte G7 KE |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Average Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (1765 - 1908, n=3) | |
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=147, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte G7 KE | |
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2660, n=147, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (2013 - 2067, n=3) | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
Gigabyte G7 KE |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Gigabyte G7 KE | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Average Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (1734 - 1989, n=3) | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=147, last 2 years) |
PCMark 10 Score | 7160 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 94222, n=182, last 2 years) | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Average Intel Core i7-13620H (38066 - 53927, n=5) | |
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
Gigabyte G7 KE |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Average of class Gaming (23681 - 99713, n=182, last 2 years) | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13620H (40342 - 61853, n=5) | |
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
Gigabyte G7 KE |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Average of class Gaming (22986 - 108954, n=182, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Average Intel Core i7-13620H (38595 - 54111, n=5) | |
Gigabyte G7 KE | |
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Average Intel Core i7-13620H (75.9 - 108.2, n=5) | |
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=182, last 2 years) | |
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Gigabyte G7 KE | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延迟
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Gigabyte G7 KE | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK |
* ... smaller is better
大容量存储
美光2400的容量为一兆字节,本身就是一款快速的NVMe PCIe 4.0固态硬盘,从性能上来说,它无法跟上竞争对手。然而,在日常使用中,这一点不应该真的被注意到。
* ... smaller is better
Continuous Performance Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
的NvidiaGeForce RTX 4060是Nvidia "Ada Lovelace "一代的中档GPU。3072个着色器单元的时钟频率最高为2.25GHz,这里安装的GPU有8GB的GDDR6内存供其使用。你可以在我们的《GPU基准列表》中找到与其他图形芯片的其他比较。 GPU基准测试列表.
在3DMark测试中,新的GPU的鼻子在上一代的 NvidiaGeForce RTX 3070- 但也仅此而已。相比之下,RTX 3070 Ti稍微快一些。与NvidiaGeForce RTX 3060相比,RTX 4060--在这里可以消耗其最大的105瓦--快了约23%。在115瓦时,3060中发现的技嘉G7 KE的消耗量比4060多一点。RTX 4060显然比RTX 4090要好得多。GeForce RTX 4090这也是意料之中的事。在3DMark基准测试中,高端芯片的运行速度是两倍。Blender基准测试结果证实了3DMark的测试结果。
与处理器一样,显卡在电池模式下也有性能限制。如果没有电源装置,只有50%的GPU性能可用。
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 50607 points | |
3DMark Vantage P Result | 90275 points | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 30831 points | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 185655 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 59494 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 22497 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 10345 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
在游戏测试中,NvidiaGeForce RTX 4060比合成基准测试做得更好。在这方面,它略微击败了GeForce RTX 3070 Ti。然而,就像RTX 4090一样,RTX 3080 Ti仍然是不可战胜的。然而,当涉及到游戏时,与旗舰产品的差异并不大,4090仍然快33%左右。
RTX 4060可以很容易地以4K UHD播放旧游戏。然而,对于新游戏,这就比较困难了,至少在没有实施DLSS的情况下。无论哪种方式,在2.5K下玩游戏是可能的。
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=163, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
Gigabyte G7 KE |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 167.7, n=167, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
Gigabyte G7 KE |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Average of class Gaming (19.2 - 201, n=179, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
Gigabyte G7 KE |
Witcher 3 frame rate diagram
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K DLSS | 4K | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 186.1 | 184.7 | 180.2 | 112.1 | 83 | 82.1 | |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 435 | 322 | 206 | 104.7 | 62.6 | ||
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 184.6 | 171 | 164.1 | 156.3 | 126 | ||
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 204 | 135.1 | 96.1 | 70.1 | 40.2 | ||
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 178.6 | 154.9 | 118.9 | 98.9 | |||
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 134 | 99 | 51 | ||||
Strange Brigade (2018) | 508 | 270 | 216 | 185.1 | 126.4 | 67.2 | |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 155.6 | 120.7 | 67.2 | ||||
Metro Exodus (2019) | 74.3 | 59 | 36.8 | ||||
Control (2019) | 238 | 119 | 89 | ||||
Borderlands 3 (2019) | 171.3 | 144.6 | 106.5 | 83.9 | |||
Death Stranding (2020) | 200 | 158.9 | 150.3 | 146.7 | |||
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) | 108.3 | 85.9 | 46.5 | ||||
Flight Simulator 2020 (2020) | 96.9 | 69.4 | 52.5 | ||||
Crysis Remastered (2020) | 312 | 224 | 85.9 | 72.5 | |||
Watch Dogs Legion (2020) | 65 | 44 | 25 | ||||
Dirt 5 (2020) | 218 | 147.2 | 116.1 | 89.5 | |||
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla (2020) | 135 | 111 | 96 | ||||
Yakuza Like a Dragon (2020) | 131.7 | 123.2 | 117.4 | 109.6 | |||
Hitman 3 (2021) | 267.5 | 197.7 | 172.7 | 163.5 | |||
Days Gone (2021) | 148 | 131.4 | 100.2 | ||||
F1 2021 (2021) | 389 | 312 | 244 | 128.9 | 93 | 50.2 | |
Alan Wake Remastered (2021) | 149.8 | 144.9 | |||||
Far Cry 6 (2021) | 97.2 | 32.6 | 3.38 | ||||
Back 4 Blood (2021) | 245 | 197.5 | 188.2 | ||||
Guardians of the Galaxy (2021) | 134 | 135 | 133 | ||||
Riders Republic (2021) | 177 | 145 | 122 | 112 | |||
Forza Horizon 5 (2021) | 137 | 125 | 84 | ||||
Battlefield 2042 (2021) | 145.6 | 123 | 106.1 | ||||
Halo Infinite (2021) | 144.9 | 123.6 | 114.2 | ||||
God of War (2022) | 67.5 | 55.6 | 34.7 | ||||
Rainbow Six Extraction (2022) | 149.1 | 106 | 52.4 | ||||
Dying Light 2 (2022) | 64.7 | 43.8 | 23 | ||||
GRID Legends (2022) | 126.4 | 102.2 | 63.9 | ||||
Elden Ring (2022) | 59.5 | ||||||
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 73.81 | 45.9 | 21.1 | ||||
Elex 2 (2022) | 115.4 | 115.4 | 113.5 | 96 | |||
Ghostwire Tokyo (2022) | 68.6 | 65.9 | 36.8 | 29.6 | |||
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 198.6 | 164.9 | 110 | 85.2 | |||
Vampire Bloodhunt (2022) | 220 | 201 | 185.7 | ||||
F1 22 (2022) | 247 | 240 | 179.2 | 65.4 | 41 | 19.7 | |
The Quarry (2022) | 154.8 | 121.3 | 100.5 | 77.9 | |||
A Plague Tale Requiem (2022) | 100.7 | 84.9 | 73 | 63.3 | |||
Uncharted Legacy of Thieves Collection (2022) | 87.9 | 85.1 | 79.1 | 76.9 | |||
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 2022 (2022) | 87 | 59 | 55 | 34 | |||
Spider-Man Miles Morales (2022) | 77.3 | 59.7 | 35.3 | ||||
The Callisto Protocol (2022) | 68.9 | 48.6 | 27 | ||||
Need for Speed Unbound (2022) | 127.4 | 117.2 | 98.9 | 98.6 | |||
High On Life (2023) | 220 | 165.8 | 125.6 | 99.9 | |||
The Witcher 3 v4.00 (2023) | 66.3 | 40.5 | 21.4 | ||||
Dead Space Remake (2023) | 67 | 43.4 | 20.6 | ||||
Hogwarts Legacy (2023) | 150 | 126.7 | 107.7 | 91.6 | |||
Returnal (2023) | |||||||
Atomic Heart (2023) | 167.3 | 129.2 | 81.6 | 66.8 | |||
Company of Heroes 3 (2023) | 202.7 | 182.1 | 133.3 | 131.3 | |||
Sons of the Forest (2023) | 82 | 79.1 | 73.3 | 71.8 |
排放。响亮的风扇,凉爽的外壳
噪声排放
当执行要求不高的任务时,微星笔记本电脑Katana 17基本无声运行--但并非总是如此。在冷却过程中,大约40 dB(A),设备运行的声音相对较大。在负载情况下,这将上升到最高59 dB(A),这对敏感的耳朵来说是非常响亮的,但对游戏来说是正常的。
我们没有发现任何线圈的啸叫。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 24.5 / 24.5 / 40 dB(A) |
Load |
| 48.3 / 59.1 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.5 dB(A) |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13620H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM | MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB | MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH | Gigabyte G7 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 | Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB | Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -2% | 6% | -9% | 16% | -0% | |
off / environment * | 24.5 | 24.6 -0% | 24.1 2% | 27 -10% | 23.9 2% | 23 6% |
Idle Minimum * | 24.5 | 29.2 -19% | 26.9 -10% | 27 -10% | 23.9 2% | 23 6% |
Idle Average * | 24.5 | 29.2 -19% | 26.9 -10% | 35 -43% | 23.9 2% | 25.92 -6% |
Idle Maximum * | 40 | 29.2 27% | 27 32% | 38 5% | 23.9 40% | 40.67 -2% |
Load Average * | 48.3 | 50.7 -5% | 43.8 9% | 52 -8% | 34.3 29% | 42.7 12% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 56 | 53.3 5% | 44.7 20% | 56 -0% | 62.48 -12% | |
Load Maximum * | 59.1 | 61 -3% | 58.3 1% | 59 -0% | 45.9 22% | 62.67 -6% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
好消息:你不应该担心在使用Katana 17时手会出汗,因为即使在压力测试中,掌托区也保持凉爽。在Witcher 3 测试中,最高温度为45.5摄氏度,也无需担心。
在微星Katana 17 B13V的压力测试中,我们没有发现任何节流现象。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.6 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.1 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.8 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.8 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 24.2 °C / 75.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+4.7 °C / 8.4 F).
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | Gigabyte G7 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 10% | -5% | -7% | -7% | 2% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 41.6 | 40.6 2% | 44.2 -6% | 52 -25% | 48.8 -17% | 35 16% |
Maximum Bottom * | 43.1 | 41.1 5% | 45.2 -5% | 54 -25% | 52.4 -22% | 53 -23% |
Idle Upper Side * | 32 | 26.2 18% | 35.4 -11% | 28 12% | 30.4 5% | 29 9% |
Idle Bottom * | 35.8 | 30.3 15% | 35 2% | 32 11% | 34.1 5% | 34 5% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
微星Katana 17的扬声器相对较响,但缺乏低音。相反,游戏玩家应该达到一个好的耳机,使风扇的噪音听不见。
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 64% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 44% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73.83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 35% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电源管理。微星公司的耗电游戏机
消耗功率
约12.2瓦的最小消耗相对较高,但对于游戏系统来说是典型的。然而,与竞争对手相比,消耗还是比较低的。
240瓦的电源装置的大小足以应付212瓦的最大耗电量。
Off / Standby | 0.02 / 0.1 Watt |
Idle | 12.2 / 14.9 / 15.8 Watt |
Load |
85.22 / 212.8 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 17.3" | MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, Mini-LED, 3840x2160, 17.3" | MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Gigabyte G7 KE i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3" | Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3" | Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -55% | -14% | -22% | -61% | -41% | -9% | -30% | |
Idle Minimum * | 12.2 | 14 -15% | 12.4 -2% | 15 -23% | 19.3 -58% | 15 -23% | 11.7 ? 4% | 13.5 ? -11% |
Idle Average * | 14.9 | 21.6 -45% | 13.1 12% | 17 -14% | 26.5 -78% | 20 -34% | 16.2 ? -9% | 19 ? -28% |
Idle Maximum * | 15.8 | 24.8 -57% | 25.3 -60% | 24 -52% | 27.1 -72% | 22.3 -41% | 20.6 ? -30% | 26.8 ? -70% |
Load Average * | 85.22 | 122.5 -44% | 105.4 -24% | 111 -30% | 141 -65% | 133 -56% | 93.8 ? -10% | 106.9 ? -25% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 151.1 | 265 -75% | 150 1% | 174.1 -15% | 225 -49% | 231 -53% | ||
Load Maximum * | 212.8 | 418 -96% | 240.5 -13% | 208 2% | 307.9 -45% | 290 -36% | 212 ? -0% | 250 ? -17% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test
Power consumption with an external monitor
电池寿命
微星Katana 17的小电池只有53.5瓦时的容量。因此,当涉及到这样一个强大的系统时,人们不应该期待良好的电池寿命。在WiFi测试中,电池只持续了三个小时,这意味着微星笔记本电脑不适合移动使用。
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 53.5 Wh | MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh | MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Gigabyte G7 KE i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 54 Wh | Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 65% | 108% | 56% | 42% | 94% | 81% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 176 | 319 81% | 353 101% | 317 80% | 250 42% | 362 106% | 376 ? 114% |
Load | 58 | 86 48% | 124 114% | 76 31% | 105 81% | 85.6 ? 48% | |
H.264 | 358 | 132 | 354 | 409 ? | |||
Reader / Idle | 439 | 425 | 565 ? |
Pros
Cons
结论:微星Katana 17 B13V是一个好的游戏系统
微星Katana 17 B13V笔记本电脑在其主要能力领域给我们留下了深刻印象--游戏。它的NvidiaGeForce RTX 4060确保高性能水平,可以与前一代的RTX 3070 Ti竞争。除了快速的GPU,微星还配备了144赫兹的显示屏以及RGB键盘,并提供了非常好的打字体验。尽管手头的权力很大,但笔记本电脑仍然相对凉爽。
最重要的是,主要的批评点是显示屏。它的亮度不高,色彩空间覆盖率差,而且响应时间高。另外,一个USB-2.0端口是2023真的可以没有的东西。除此之外,我们还发现键盘布局执行得很差,因为FN等键被移到了相当不寻常的位置。糟糕的电池寿命是可以预期的,但仍然值得批评。
GeForce RTX 4060。微星17 Katana B13V的吸引力取决于GPU。
总的来说,微星Katana 17赢得了良好的评价,加上RTX 4060,对游戏玩家来说绝对是一个有趣的选择。然而,在通货膨胀时期,这也适用于前一代的设备,如技嘉G7 KE配有RTX 3060。对价格敏感的客户可以在上一代的机型上节省很多钱。
价格和可用性
在发表这篇评论的时候,微星Katana 17 B14V目前在亚马逊和百思买上无法购买。然而,上一代型号(3070Ti)目前在亚马逊上可以买到,,大约1499 美元。
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK
- 02/21/2023 v7 (old)
Benjamin Herzig
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.