微星Titan GT77 HX 13V评测--带RTX 4090和Core i9-13950HX的终极游戏笔记本电脑
微星的泰坦GT77系列提供了为最大性能而设计的旗舰级游戏笔记本电脑。新的2023款GT77 HX 13VI延续了这一概念,并使用了一些现有的最好的移动组件。除了英特尔最新的Raptor Lake-HX CPU之外,你还可以享受Nvidia的全新笔记本GPU:GeForce RTX 4080或GeForce RTX 4090.微星还为新的GT77配备了刷新率为144赫兹的4K Mini-LED屏幕。
我们的审查单位是一个预生产单位,配备了酷睿i9-13950HX,GeForce RTX 4090,64GB内存,4TB SSD存储,以及4K Mini-LED屏幕。具有相同规格的零售配置(GT77 HX 13VI)将配备酷睿i9-13980HX(稍高的时钟,但没有vPro支持),在德国的零售价为6599欧元(5299美元);带有RTX 4080和2TB SSD存储的SKU售价为5499欧元(GT77 HX 13VH,4299美元)。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
89 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2023 | MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | 3.5 kg | 23 mm | 17.30" | 3840x2160 | |
91.2 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2023 | Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 21.99 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
86.9 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2022 | Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.9 kg | 28.3 mm | 17.30" | 2560x1440 | |
88.3 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2022 | MSI Titan GT77 12UHS i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | 3.3 kg | 23 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
89.2 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2022 | Alienware x17 R2 P48E i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | 3.1 kg | 20.9 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
87.6 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2022 | SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.8 kg | 27 mm | 17.00" | 2560x1600 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
案例 - 泰坦,照明有限
微星公司为去年的泰坦GT77,所以新的型号没有视觉上的变化。黑色的机箱对于高端玩家来说是非常克制的,RGB照明也仅限于盖子上的标志以及后面的风扇排气口。这取决于个人喜好,但当你关闭照明时,你至少还可以在专业环境中使用这台笔记本电脑。你会很快看到光滑表面上的指纹,这需要定期清洁。微星公司在2023型号上仍然使用16:9的长宽比屏幕。
机箱的质量还算不错,尽管它几乎完全由塑料制成。特别是底部的粗糙材料并没有真正达到高价位的预期,也可以在500欧元的笔记本电脑上使用。不过,整体的制造质量还是不错的;底座非常结实,只有轻微的吱吱声。另一方面,盖子比较灵活,但我们无法引起图片的失真。我们希望显示器的铰链稍微硬一些,而且当你调整开启角度(最高可达135度)时,盖子会有一点晃动。
GT77仍然是一台相对较薄的机器,只有2.3厘米,特别是考虑到强大的硬件。然而,由于后部有大型冷却装置,这款笔记本非常深,占地面积比竞争对手大得多。它也非常重,几乎有3.5公斤,你必须为笨重的330瓦电源适配器再增加1.4公斤。
连接性--Thunderbolt和读卡器
在端口方面没有任何变化,你仍然得到所有重要的标准。所有的端口都位于两边,因为后面的区域专门用于冷却。你也可以在后部的USB-C端口为电池充电,但需要一个100W的电源适配器(65W的模块不起作用)。
SD卡阅读器
SD卡读卡器可以容纳全尺寸的存储卡,使用我们的参考卡(AV Pro V60),平均传输速率超过80 MB/s。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E (AV Pro V60) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=89, last 2 years) | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI (Angelibird AV Pro V60) | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E (AV Pro V60) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=90, last 2 years) | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI (Angelibird AV Pro V60) |
沟通
微星为新的泰坦GT77配备了Wi-Fi模块杀手AX1690i,它支持当前的Wi-Fi 6E标准以及蓝牙5.3。我们的美国样品没有连接到华硕的参考路由器的6GHz,但是当我们使用5GHz网络(Wi-Fi 6)时,信号质量也非常好。你也可以使用2.5Gbps的以太网端口。
网络摄像头
网络摄像头配备了一个机械快门,但这几乎是所有的积极方面。微星仍然使用糟糕的720p网络摄像头,即使在良好的照明条件下也不能拍出好照片。你可以在2023年期待更多,特别是考虑到价格。
维护
整个底盖由标准的飞利浦螺钉固定,可以拆卸,但盖子贴得很紧,过程并不容易。除了四个SO-DIMM插槽外,你还可以使用三个M.2插槽进行升级。也可以更换Wi-Fi模块和清洁风扇。微星改变了冷却布局,使用了更多的热管,相比于 以前的模型,这意味着第四个M.2插槽必须被移除。
输入设备--微星具有出色的机械键盘
我们已经喜欢上了上一个型号的机械键盘。 以前的型号而这一点没有改变。与传统的橡胶圆顶键盘相比,打字的噪音要高一些,但樱桃单元明显比你能得到的机械键盘要安静。XMG Neo 17比如说。方向键和专用数字键盘(有点窄)使用传统的开关。可以单独调整每个键的灯光,但你也可以为所有的键选择一种不显眼的颜色。指纹扫描仪被安装在方向键正下方的掌托上。
在我们的审查中,大型点击板工作良好,标准的光标操作没有问题,但点击噪音有点大。然而,大多数游戏玩家无论如何都会使用外部鼠标或游戏手柄。
显示器 - 4K迷你LED,144赫兹
微星不仅使用了最新的CPU和GPU模型,还提供了全新的Mini-LED面板,分辨率为4K(16:9,3840 x 2160像素),刷新率为144Hz。也有可能得到一个240赫兹的QHD IPS屏幕。友达光电的哑光Mini-LED面板(B173ZAN06.C)的主观画质令人印象深刻,内容锐利,色彩丰富。黑色图像实际上是黑色的,而且在Mini-LED屏幕上没有背光渗出。微星公司宣传说有1000多个调光区,但你仍然可以注意到开花。由于整个调光区被照亮,黑暗背景上的明亮物体会产生明亮的云彩。然而,你只有在标志出现时才会真正注意到它,但我们在游戏或日常事物中没有注意到它。我们测量的平均亮度为600尼特,由于黑值低,对比度非常高。
该面板支持HDR 1000,我们可以确认在完全白色的图像上的最大亮度超过1000尼特,但该面板并没有达到更高的数值,而MacBook Pro 16的Mini-LED面板Apple MacBook Pro 16而MacBook Pro 16的Mini-LED面板在显示的小部分可以达到1600尼特。与MacOS相比,Windows中的HDR实现仍然是一场灾难。HDR必须手动激活,你不能再使用任何颜色配置文件,而且你不能在电池上使用HDR。考虑到这些问题,如果许多用户根本不使用HDR,我们不会感到惊讶,这是一种耻辱。尽管有磨砂表面,但HDR视频的质量与MacBook Pro 16相当,我们对它进行了并列测试。
|
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 402 cd/m²
Contrast: 6060000:1 (Black: 0.0001 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1.8
ΔE Greyscale 6.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
92.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
94.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.63
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI B173ZAN06.C, Mini-LED, 3840x2160, 17.3" | Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 CSOT T3 MNG007DA4-1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W NE173QHM-NZ2, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3" | MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Sharp SHP1544 LQ173M1JW08, IPS-Level, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Alienware x17 R2 P48E AU Optronics B173HAN, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 BOE0A99, IPS, 2560x1600, 17" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 0% | -2% | -16% | -10% | -17% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 94.9 | 98.5 4% | 97.1 2% | 70.8 -25% | 79.2 -17% | 69 -27% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.9 | 100 0% | 99.9 0% | 98.9 -1% | 99.8 0% | 99.8 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 92.4 | 89.7 -3% | 84.8 -8% | 73 -21% | 79.6 -14% | 69.6 -25% |
Response Times | 69% | 74% | 86% | 67% | 75% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 38.4 ? | 6.6 ? 83% | 5.7 ? 85% | 3.03 ? 92% | 12.4 ? 68% | 10.8 ? 72% |
Response Time Black / White * | 26.6 ? | 12 ? 55% | 10.1 ? 62% | 5.28 ? 80% | 9.2 ? 65% | 6.1 ? 77% |
PWM Frequency | 2380 ? | |||||
Screen | -38877% | -37485% | -44442% | -32218% | -47756% | |
Brightness middle | 606 | 456.8 -25% | 320 -47% | 280 -54% | 365.4 -40% | 415 -32% |
Brightness | 602 | 437 -27% | 303 -50% | 275 -54% | 344 -43% | 399 -34% |
Brightness Distribution | 93 | 83 -11% | 87 -6% | 79 -15% | 85 -9% | 90 -3% |
Black Level * | 0.0001 | 0.35 -349900% | 0.3 -299900% | 0.4 -399900% | 0.29 -289900% | 0.43 -429900% |
Contrast | 6060000 | 1305 -100% | 1067 -100% | 700 -100% | 1260 -100% | 965 -100% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.8 | 3.7 23% | 1.1 77% | 2.1 56% | 3.17 34% | 1.44 70% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.2 | 6.42 22% | 2.7 67% | 5.83 29% | 7.69 6% | 2.33 72% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.8 | 0.66 63% | 1.58 12% | 0.51 72% | 0.89 51% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.5 | 2.6 60% | 1.1 83% | 3.3 49% | 5.3 18% | 1.8 72% |
Gamma | 2.63 84% | 2.3 96% | 2.13 103% | 2.13 103% | 2.18 101% | 2.132 103% |
CCT | 6596 99% | 6108 106% | 6599 98% | 7060 92% | 5879 111% | 6327 103% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -12936% /
-24983% | -12471% /
-23057% | -14791% /
-28561% | -10720% /
-20704% | -15899% /
-30693% |
* ... smaller is better
微星为Titan GT77提供了真彩软件,它为色彩空间和场景(如玩家、办公室、电影)提供了不同的预设,你甚至可以使用该软件来校准屏幕。我们将专业的CalMAN软件与X-Rite i1 Pro 2分光光度计和Profile Display P3结合使用,因为该面板应该覆盖全部P3色域。
与P3参考色域相比,开箱后的偏差非常大,无论是灰度还是颜色。我们自己的校准(相应的配置文件可在上面的显示框中免费获得)明显改善了色彩性能,但也使最大亮度降低了约50尼特。我们仍然推荐使用校准后的配置文件,并且可以编辑图片/视频,尽管我们的测量显示P3色彩空间只覆盖了95%。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
26.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9.2 ms rise | |
↘ 17.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 63 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
38.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13.6 ms rise | |
↘ 24.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 54 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 2380 Hz | ≤ 100 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 2380 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 2380 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
我们在所有亮度水平(甚至是最大HDR亮度)检测PWM,频率为2.38 kHz,这使得确定响应时间真的很棘手。我们将在以后添加相应的结果。
哑光面板和高亮度在户外应该很不错,但微星限制了GT77的户外能力。在电池供电的情况下,HDR是不可能的,而且只要你拆开电源适配器,SDR的最大亮度也会从~600尼特降低到~400尼特。在可视角度的稳定性方面没有任何限制。
性能 - Core i9 HX & RTX 4090
我们的评测设备配备了酷睿i9-13950HX,是英特尔最快的移动CPU之一。零售版将配备酷睿i9-13980HX但它只为P核提供了100MHz的最高时钟,以支持vPro。当你玩游戏时,后者并不重要,但当你计划将泰坦作为移动工作站使用时,可能会有兴趣。微星仍然使用DDR5-4800,而不是更快的DDR5-5600,你可以选择新的GeForce RTX 4080或RTX 4090用于笔记本电脑。
审查设置
预装的微星中心软件提供了不同的性能设置,包括AI模式和四个额外的预设(极限性能、平衡、静音、超级电池)。由于有MUX,你还可以选择图形模式(混合,只有dGPU,只有iGPU),但不支持高级优化,这意味着改变需要重新启动。
我们使用独立GPU模式(iGPU停用)的极限性能预设来进行基准测试,但我们使用iGPU进行电池测试。我们在使用微星软件时没有遇到任何严重的问题,但在独立显卡模式下有一个错误,我们无法降低显示亮度。我们预计这个问题将在零售设备上得到解决。
处理器 - Core i9-13950HX
与之相反的是 较慢的Raptor Lake移动处理器,英特尔改变了高端HX系列芯片的核心配置,与旧的Alder Lake CPU相比。频率更高,但现在也有两倍的效率核心(从8到16),这意味着CPU可以同时执行多达32个线程(16个E-cores + 8个P-cores与超线程)。
新的酷睿i9-13950HX在微星Titan GT77中的表现非常好,这要归功于慷慨的功率限制。性能有一些波动,但我们可以观察到在基准测试开始时的功耗超过200W,然后芯片会稳定在150W左右。性能比旧的泰坦GT77与酷睿i9-12900HX在所有CPU基准测试中的性能提升了22%,而新的Razer Blade 16中的Core i9-13950HXRazer Blade 16也被击败了14%。
正如预期的那样,我们在多核测试中看到了最大的改进,在那里你只是注意到了更高的核心数量。比如说。在Cinebench R23多核测试中,新GT77比配备Core i9-12900HX的旧GT77快45%。与其他猛禽湖HX处理器相比,其优势也表明这是一个非常快的实现。新模型在单核测试中也更快,但优势要低得多,只有6-10%。
即使在最快的性能模式下,CPU性能也被锁定在25W,这导致在多核情况下的性能赤字超过70%。其他CPU基准测试列在 我们的技术部分.
Cinebench R15 Multi Dauertest
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (24560 - 33277, n=7) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Average of class Gaming (5668 - 36249, n=193, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (1952 - 2113, n=7) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Average of class Gaming (1088 - 2235, n=191, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (8697 - 12648, n=7) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=191, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (742 - 816, n=7) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Average of class Gaming (427 - 856, n=191, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (3625 - 5227, n=7) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=198, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (274 - 303, n=7) | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Average of class Gaming (176.6 - 318, n=195, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Average of class Gaming (87 - 555, n=186, last 2 years) | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (100 - 137, n=7) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (99351 - 127295, n=7) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Average of class Gaming (23795 - 140932, n=190, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (6445 - 7064, n=7) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Average of class Gaming (4168 - 7581, n=190, last 2 years) | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (16776 - 21853, n=7) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 23194, n=191, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (1805 - 2097, n=7) | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2210, n=191, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (26 - 34.5, n=7) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Average of class Gaming (6.72 - 38.9, n=190, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Average of class Gaming (31.4 - 96.6, n=187, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (32.8 - 52.1, n=7) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.759, n=191, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (0.3823 - 0.4121, n=7) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (18131 - 28957, n=7) | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Average of class Gaming (4986 - 60169, n=187, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (102591 - 144303, n=7) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Average of class Gaming (25360 - 252486, n=187, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (4981 - 7093, n=7) | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Average of class Gaming (1339 - 10389, n=187, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (131931 - 140103, n=7) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=187, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (12381 - 17057, n=7) | |
Average of class Gaming (4800 - 32988, n=187, last 2 years) | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (46539 - 71038, n=7) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Average of class Gaming (12321 - 134044, n=187, last 2 years) | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (99981 - 204491, n=7) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=187, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (1472 - 2069, n=7) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Average of class Gaming (373 - 2409, n=187, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (9787 - 15573, n=7) | |
Average of class Gaming (2540 - 31796, n=187, last 2 years) | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (40233 - 50864, n=7) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=188, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 |
系统性能
GT77的主观性能非常好,合成基准测试结果也非常好,但考虑到强大的硬件,这几乎不足为奇。竞争对手的速度也非常快,你会注意到系统之间的巨大差异。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (7597 - 8884, n=2) | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=168, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (10903 - 11761, n=2) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12334, n=167, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=167, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (8330 - 9851, n=2) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (13099 - 16424, n=2) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Average of class Gaming (6703 - 18475, n=167, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 |
CrossMark / Overall | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (2019 - 2139, n=2) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=151, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1909 - 1977, n=2) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=151, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (2222 - 2423, n=2) | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2660, n=151, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1792 - 1861, n=2) | |
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=151, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 |
PCMark 10 Score | 8884 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (61938 - 78494, n=7) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 94222, n=187, last 2 years) | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (62368 - 86207, n=7) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Average of class Gaming (23681 - 99713, n=187, last 2 years) | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (59501 - 80441, n=7) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
Average of class Gaming (22986 - 108954, n=187, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=187, last 2 years) | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (84.4 - 99.5, n=7) | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延时
我们的标准化延迟测试(网页浏览、4K YouTube播放、CPU负载)显示了当前BIOS版本(1.04)对实时音频应用的重大限制。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
2023泰坦是首批拥有快速PCIe 5.0接口的笔记本电脑之一,但目前市场上几乎没有任何合适的SSD。另外两个插槽支持PCIe 4.0,我们的评测单元配备了两个来自三星的2TB固态硬盘(PM9A1,980 Pro的OEM版本),采用RAID 0配置。除了4TB的巨大容量(用户有3.97个免费容量),我们还可以记录到11GB/s以北的传输率。然而,这种性能不能维持很久,几分钟后就会大幅下降,所以SSD冷却器可能是一个好主意。更多的SSD基准测试可在 这里.
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU性能 - RTX 4090 笔记本电脑
的GeForce RTX 4090是Nvidia新的高端移动GPU,GT77使用最快的版本,最大功耗为175W(150W TGP + 25W来自CPU的动态提升),16GB VRAM,最大核心时钟为2340 MHz。
图形性能很好,新的RTX 4090位于桌面型号之间RTX 3090/RTX 3090 Ti和台式机型号RTX 4070 Ti和RTX 4080在合成基准测试中。与老式移动设备相比,其优势在于RTX 3080 Ti在以前的GT77是40-60%(取决于基准测试),尽管TGP相同。而移动RTX 4080中的Razer Blade 16的移动RTX 4080慢了大约17-19%,这取决于基准测试。
新泰坦可以保持图形性能,3dMarkTime Spy 压力测试很容易通过,达到99%。虽然在电池供电的情况下,功耗被限制在27W,这导致了几乎80%的性能赤字。
Geekbench 5.5: OpenCL Score
GFXBench: 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (34246 - 44948, n=7) | |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | |
Average of class Gaming (4663 - 44948, n=20, last 2 years) | |
Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU | |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU |
3DMark / Speed Way Score | |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 | |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (4401 - 5940, n=27) | |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 | |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | |
Average of class Gaming (116 - 5940, n=98, last 2 years) | |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU |
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (240 - 246, n=2) | |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | |
Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU | |
Average of class Gaming (16.3 - 246, n=8, last 2 years) |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (522 - 550, n=2) | |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | |
Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU | |
Average of class Gaming (45 - 550, n=8, last 2 years) |
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 67927 points | |
3DMark Vantage P Result | 113387 points | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 49253 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 37594 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 25475 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 20862 points | |
Help |
Photoshop PugetBench: Filter Score | General Score | GPU Score | Overall Score
Premiere Pro PugetBench: GPU 0.9 | Live Playback 0.9 | Export 0.9 | Overall Score 0.9
Blender / v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | |
Alienware x15 R2 P111F | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Average of class Gaming (9 - 95, n=177, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC | |
Intel Core i5-13400F | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (9 - 19, n=39) | |
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SG | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4080 SG |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CUDA | |
Alienware x15 R2 P111F | |
Average of class Gaming (16 - 175, n=183, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC | |
Intel Core i5-13400F | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (16 - 24, n=39) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
Alienware x15 R2 P111F | |
Intel Core i5-13400F | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Average of class Gaming (138 - 962, n=191, last 2 years) | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (144 - 305, n=39) | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom METAL | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max |
Photoshop PugetBench / Filter Score | |
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4080 SG | |
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC | |
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SG | |
Intel Core i5-13400F | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (91.9 - 104.6, n=5) | |
Average of class Gaming (41.2 - 135.1, n=10, last 2 years) |
Photoshop PugetBench / General Score | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (151.8 - 168.2, n=5) | |
Average of class Gaming (69.1 - 168.2, n=10, last 2 years) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max | |
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4080 SG | |
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC | |
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SG | |
Intel Core i5-13400F |
Photoshop PugetBench / GPU Score | |
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4080 SG | |
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC | |
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SG | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (109.1 - 119.4, n=5) | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Intel Core i5-13400F | |
Average of class Gaming (40 - 119.4, n=10, last 2 years) |
Photoshop PugetBench / Overall Score | |
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4080 SG | |
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC | |
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SG | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1225 - 1356, n=5) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max | |
Average of class Gaming (552 - 1356, n=10, last 2 years) | |
Intel Core i5-13400F |
Premiere Pro PugetBench / GPU 0.9 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (75.8 - 109.2, n=3) | |
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4080 SG | |
Intel Core i5-13400F | |
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC | |
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SG | |
Average of class Gaming (46.6 - 109.2, n=7, last 2 years) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max |
Premiere Pro PugetBench / Live Playback 0.9 | |
Average of class Gaming (73.1 - 232, n=7, last 2 years) | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (91.7 - 118, n=3) | |
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4080 SG | |
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SG | |
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC | |
Intel Core i5-13400F | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max |
Premiere Pro PugetBench / Export 0.9 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SG | |
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4080 SG | |
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (78.4 - 113.4, n=3) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max | |
Average of class Gaming (57.5 - 113.4, n=7, last 2 years) | |
Intel Core i5-13400F |
Premiere Pro PugetBench / Overall Score 0.9 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Average of class Gaming (663 - 1308, n=7, last 2 years) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (821 - 1105, n=3) | |
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SG | |
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4080 SG | |
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC | |
Intel Core i5-13400F |
Photoshop PugetBench: Filter Score | General Score | GPU Score | Overall Score
Premiere Pro PugetBench: GPU 0.9 | Live Playback 0.9 | Export 0.9 | Overall Score 0.9
* ... smaller is better
RTX 4090没有像工作站GPU那样的特殊驱动,但性能仍然令人印象深刻,新的GeForce GPU甚至可以击败专业的RTX A5500在一些SPECviewperf测试中(如Maya、SiemensNX)。然而,消费级GPU有时也是垫底的,所以这取决于你的工作负荷,但专业GPU并不总是需要的。
游戏性能
游戏性能非常惊人,酷睿i9-13950HX和RTX 4090的组合可以流畅地处理所有测试的游戏,甚至在4K的最大设置下。唯一的例外是极端情况,如4K下RT Ultra预设的《赛博朋克2077》,在那里你可以用升频来帮助你(后面会有更多介绍)。我们在每台笔记本电脑上测试的默认游戏显示,与旧的RTX 3080 Ti相比,平均优势为26%。RTX 3080 Ti但在较新的游戏和较高的分辨率下,优势更大。
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=168, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 167.7, n=171, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 |
雷电追踪的性能也非常好,新的RTX 4090大致上与桌面RTX 4070 Ti.
The Witcher 3 v4.00 - 1920x1080 RT Ultra Preset / On AA:FX | |
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SG | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (53.1 - 68, n=5) | |
Average of class Gaming (12.9 - 66, n=11, last 2 years) |
The Callisto Protocol - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (without FSR Upscaling) + Full Ray-Tracing | |
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4080 SG | |
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SG | |
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (32 - 79.6, n=5) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
Average of class Gaming (32 - 79.6, n=15, last 2 years) |
Spider-Man Miles Morales - 1920x0180 Very High Preset + Ray-Tracing AA:T | |
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4080 SG | |
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SG | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (79.6 - 96.2, n=4) | |
Average of class Gaming (19.1 - 96.2, n=12, last 2 years) |
Watch Dogs Legion - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset + Ultra Ray Tracing (DX12) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
Zotac Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 Ti AMP Extreme Holo | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (84 - 90, n=2) | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Average of class Gaming (14 - 90, n=6, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x15 R2 P111F |
游戏 | 设置 | DLSS关闭 | DLSS开启(平衡) | 差异 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Spider-Man Miles Morales | 4K Ultra | 83 FPS | 132 FPS | +59 % |
Witcher 3 4.00 | 4K RT Ultra | 27 FPS | 50 FPS | +85 % |
Cyberpunk 2077 1.5 | RT 4K | 22 FPS | 95 FPS | +331 % |
战争之神 | 4K Ultra | 80 FPS | 111 FPS | +38 % |
Witcher 3 FPS-Diagramm
我们还用我们的Witcher 3 测试检查了新GPU的效率。CPU的影响不是很大,我们使用连接到外部屏幕的数值,所以我们可以消除不同类型的显示器,也可以与桌面GPU的结果进行比较。新的RTX 4090的结果令人印象深刻,因为该GPU比RTX 3080 Ti Mobile(140W)的效率高约40%,在Alienware x15和桌面RTX 4080.新的GT77的效率也比以前的型号高53%。 之前的型号与RTX 3080 Ti在相同的TGP下。
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K DLSS | 4K | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 184.1 | 182.6 | 140.9 | 138.5 | 175.7 | ||
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 619 | 546 | 422 | 198.9 | 160 | ||
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 225 | 206 | 194.1 | 185.9 | 178.9 | ||
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 230 | 221 | 187.4 | 162.9 | 94.7 | ||
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 203 | 177.5 | 134.1 | 114.3 | |||
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 186 | 173 | 160 | 159 | 113 | ||
Strange Brigade (2018) | 490 | 396 | 391 | 373 | 309 | 159.3 | |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 245 | 227 | 219 | 214 | 187 | 103 | |
Metro Exodus (2019) | 204 | 183 | 153 | 132 | 116 | 81 | |
Control (2019) | 240 | 232 | 187 | 122 | 63 | ||
Borderlands 3 (2019) | 201 | 176 | 162 | 151 | 130 | 76 | |
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) | 209 | 189 | 174 | 163 | 154 | 131 | 95 |
Mafia Definitive Edition (2020) | 219 | 189 | 179 | 161 | 93 | ||
Watch Dogs Legion (2020) | 152 | 144 | 131 | 120 | 109 | 69 | |
F1 2021 (2021) | 501 | 449 | 417 | 209 | 192.4 | 114.4 | |
Far Cry 6 (2021) | 167 | 147 | 144 | 135 | 89 | ||
Forza Horizon 5 (2021) | 220 | 181 | 174 | 124 | 113 | 95 | |
God of War (2022) | 201 | 200 | 180 | 133 | 115 | 80 | |
Rainbow Six Extraction (2022) | 378 | 347 | 346 | 314 | 219 | 112 | |
Dying Light 2 (2022) | 240 | 206 | 174 | 121 | 62 | ||
GRID Legends (2022) | 254 | 230 | 210 | 199 | 190 | 132 | |
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 156 | 144 | 138 | 135 | 98 | 56 | |
Ghostwire Tokyo (2022) | 237 | 236 | 234 | 231 | 206 | 100 | |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 339 | 289 | 224 | 182 | 131 | 70 | |
F1 22 (2022) | 316 | 294 | 283 | 138.2 | 90.1 | 44.9 | |
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 2022 (2022) | 230 | 215 | 183 | 176 | 135 | 126 | 85 |
Spider-Man Miles Morales (2022) | 134 | 131 | 118 | 116 | 113 | 83 | |
The Callisto Protocol (2022) | 195 | 181 | 145 | 144 | 114 | 68 | |
The Witcher 3 v4.00 (2023) | 240 | 189 | 173 | 150 | 104 | 50 | |
Dead Space Remake (2023) | 147 | 141 | 130 | 129 | 100 | 53 |
排放--GT77有更多的热管
系统噪音
Titan GT77使用四个风扇和大量的热管来散发所有的热量。其中一个风扇(根据微星控制的说法是风扇1)总是以大约1500转/分钟的速度旋转,与电源设置无关,这导致了29.2分贝(A)的杂音。因此,这绝不是一个安静的系统,你有时也能听到29 dB(A)的电子噪音。持续的风扇活动意味着在轻度工作负荷如网络浏览时,风扇不会旋转。然而,如果你开始给CPU或GPU施加压力,它将很快变得非常嘈杂。非常有趣的是,我们在CPU负载期间得到了最响亮的风扇,为61 dB(A),而压力测试 "只 "得到了53.3 dB(A)。原因是风扇的行为,这在下面的图片中也可以看到。
我们测量了53至56 dB(A),取决于标题,这显然是非常响亮的。这里有两种不同的方法,你可以使用耳机(最好有降噪功能),或者使用静音模式,这将把风扇噪音限制在39.6 dB(A)。性能也会受到影响,但由于巨大的性能储备,大多数游戏仍然可以顺利运行。你可以手动激活Cooler Boost功能,这将导致62.8 dB(A),但我们在测试中从未达到这个水平。
极端性能 | 平衡 | 静音 | |
---|---|---|---|
Witcher 3 4.00 Ultra 4K | 55.7 dB(A) | 55.7 dB(A) | 39.6 dB(A) |
Witcher 3 Ultra | 53.3 dB(A) | 53.3 dB(A) | 39.6 dB(A) |
死亡空间重制版超4K | 55.7 dB(A) | 53.3 dB(A) | 39.6 dB(A) |
CB R23 Multi | 61 dB(A) | 55.7 dB(A) | 36.8 dB(A) |
Furmark | 56.1 dB(A) | 53.3 dB(A) | 39.6 dB(A) |
Noise Level
Idle |
| 29.2 / 29.2 / 29.2 dB(A) |
Load |
| 50.7 / 61 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.6 dB(A) |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB | Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024 | Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB | MSI Titan GT77 12UHS GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Alienware x17 R2 P48E GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0) | SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 16% | 19% | 10% | 18% | -2% | |
off / environment * | 24.6 | 23 7% | 23.9 3% | 21.9 11% | 22.7 8% | 26 -6% |
Idle Minimum * | 29.2 | 23 21% | 23.9 18% | 24.53 16% | 23.1 21% | 26 11% |
Idle Average * | 29.2 | 23 21% | 23.9 18% | 24.53 16% | 23.1 21% | 29 1% |
Idle Maximum * | 29.2 | 23.6 19% | 23.9 18% | 24.53 16% | 23.1 21% | 40 -37% |
Load Average * | 50.7 | 39 23% | 34.3 32% | 46.25 9% | 31.9 37% | 47 7% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 53.3 | 51.6 3% | 56.86 -7% | 52.5 2% | 52 2% | |
Load Maximum * | 61 | 51.3 16% | 45.9 25% | 54.25 11% | 52.5 14% | 54 11% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
响亮的风扇有很大的优势,因为表面温度出奇的低,在较长时间的游戏过程中,你仍然可以不受任何限制地使用键盘。我们多次检查结果,但数字都是一样的。我们几乎无法在负载下测量到超过40℃的温度,考虑到性能,这是一个很好的结果。
在压力测试中,CPU和GPU会很快分别达到75W和150W的水平,性能也很稳定。该系统的总冷却功率为225W,但微星甚至宣传说,对于使用Core i9-13980HX因此,温度可能会更高一些(我们并不期望风扇的声音更大)。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.6 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.1 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.2 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.2 °C / 97 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.6 °C / 85.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-0.7 °C / -1.3 F).
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -5% | -19% | -22% | -11% | -18% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 40.6 | 40 1% | 48.8 -20% | 40.8 -0% | 49.6 -22% | 49 -21% |
Maximum Bottom * | 41.1 | 37.6 9% | 52.4 -27% | 52.4 -27% | 42.4 -3% | 52 -27% |
Idle Upper Side * | 26.2 | 32.4 -24% | 30.4 -16% | 34.6 -32% | 29.2 -11% | 30 -15% |
Idle Bottom * | 30.3 | 31.4 -4% | 34.1 -13% | 38.4 -27% | 32 -6% | 33 -9% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
GT77仍然提供两个良好的立体声扬声器与两个低音扬声器的组合,产生了一个体面的声音。然而,你不能在游戏过程中真正享受,因为风扇的声音实在太大,但对于偶尔的音乐和视频播放来说,这个音响系统绝对足够了。
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理--泰坦号配备99.9Wh电池
消耗功率
新的GT77在空转时的功耗与iGPU并不差,而且在负载下与以前的型号也没有大的差别,考虑到性能的提高,这令人印象深刻。当我们开始进行压力测试时,我们可以观察到最大消耗量高达420W,但一旦组件稳定下来,它将迅速下降到~290W。这意味着330W的电源适配器是足够的。
Off / Standby | 0.59 / 0.82 Watt |
Idle | 14 / 21.6 / 24.8 Watt |
Load |
122.5 / 418 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, Mini-LED, 3840x2160, 17.3" | Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, SSSTC CA6-8D1024, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3" | MSI Titan GT77 12UHS i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS-Level, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Alienware x17 R2 P48E i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW, IPS, 2560x1600, 17" | Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -12% | -7% | -30% | -37% | 33% | -12% | 12% | |
Idle Minimum * | 14 | 15.2 -9% | 19.3 -38% | 30.21 -116% | 24.1 -72% | 7 50% | 16.9 ? -21% | 13.5 ? 4% |
Idle Average * | 21.6 | 22.8 -6% | 26.5 -23% | 32.42 -50% | 28.5 -32% | 11 49% | 24 ? -11% | 18.9 ? 12% |
Idle Maximum * | 24.8 | 49.8 -101% | 27.1 -9% | 33.7 -36% | 60 -142% | 17 31% | 35.1 ? -42% | 26.7 ? -8% |
Load Average * | 122.5 | 121.2 1% | 141 -15% | 125.09 -2% | 128.7 -5% | 92 25% | 130.5 ? -7% | 106.6 ? 13% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 265 | 242 9% | 225 15% | 256 3% | 254 4% | 221 17% | ||
Load Maximum * | 418 | 273.7 35% | 307.9 26% | 321.88 23% | 323 23% | 306 27% | 324 ? 22% | 249 ? 40% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test
Power consumption external screen
电池运行时间
微星已经实现了99.9Wh的最大电池,但由于高消耗的数字,电池运行时间仍然有限。我们已经提到,在电池供电的情况下,显示亮度会降低,你也不能使用HDR,但在实际情况下,在150尼特的亮度下(占我们评测设备最大亮度的69%),你仍然可以期待大约5-6小时。最短的运行时间是1.5小时,但我们已经提到,性能会大大降低。当设备打开时,充满电需要158分钟;在超过1.5小时后,可使用80%的容量。
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh | Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 95.2 Wh | Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | MSI Titan GT77 12UHS i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh | Alienware x17 R2 P48E i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 87 Wh | SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 99 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 4% | -22% | 15% | -55% | 35% | 10% | |
H.264 | 358 | 433 21% | 398 11% | 408 ? 14% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 319 | 365 14% | 250 -22% | 412.1 29% | 117 -63% | 537 68% | 376 ? 18% |
Load | 86 | 81 -6% | 82 -5% | 46 -47% | 109 27% | 85.3 ? -1% | |
Witcher 3 ultra | 90 | 78.3 ? |
Pros
Cons
结论 - GT77具有极端的游戏性能和出色的显示效果
由于价格高昂,新的微星泰坦GT77很可能只能接触到非常小的用户群,但它仍然是一个令人印象深刻的可能展示。这款高端游戏机结合了你目前在几乎所有方面可以得到的最好的组件,它是一个非常好的整体包装,它不必躲在成熟的桌面系统后面。
我们已经知道了前代产品的底盘,它给人留下了体面的印象,但照明选择相当有限(这可能是好的或坏的,取决于你的喜好),光滑的表面非常容易留下指纹。机械键盘仍然很出色,而且有足够的端口。新的 来自英特尔当前猛禽湖一代的HX处理器比上一代平均快22%左右,但新的GeForce RTX 4090更加令人印象深刻。尽管TGP类似于175W,但它比旧的RTX 3080 Ti快40-60 %。RTX 3080 Ti并能与桌面版的RTX 3090/RTX 3090 Ti竞争。与目前的RTX-40xx桌面GPU相比,新的RTX 4090笔记本电脑正好位于RTX 4070 Ti和RTX 4080之间。
现在没有任何游戏笔记本电脑能提供更多的性能。配备酷睿i9-13950HX的微星GT77和GeForce RTX 4090使用的是你能得到的最快的笔记本电脑硬件。游戏在新的4K Mini-LED面板上看起来也令人难以置信。
硬件组合在新的Mini-LED屏幕的原生4K分辨率(144赫兹)上没有任何问题。主观的画质很好,游戏看起来就非常好。你还可以在校准后使用该面板进行图片编辑,这可以通过预装的真彩软件实现。该显示器还支持亮度超过1000尼特的HDR,但与macOS相比,Windows中的HDR实现仍然很糟糕,在macOS中它只是无缝运行。
考虑到强大的硬件、不显眼的机箱设计、良好的显示效果和出色的键盘,泰坦GT77作为移动工作站也非常好用,甚至RTX A5500在一些专业应用中也落后。
四个风扇和大量热管的冷却效果非常好,即使在负载下,我们也很难测出超过40℃的表面温度,但风扇的噪音却非常大。在游戏过程中,你应该期待54-57 dB(A),当你只强调CPU时,甚至超过60 dB(A)。风扇的噪音非常稳定,但我们仍然建议使用耳机(最好有主动降噪功能)。也可以使用静音模式,将风扇噪音降低到40 dB(A)。性能会受到影响,但在大多数游戏中仍然绰绰有余。
微星泰坦GT77也有一些缺点,特别是考虑到其高昂的价格。这包括使用廉价的塑料(尤其是底盖),缓慢的DDR5-4800内存和糟糕的720p网络摄像头。两个2TB固态硬盘在RAID 0配置中的性能非常高,但不稳定。GT77是我们评测中第一台采用新硬件的17英寸游戏笔记本电脑,我们已经迫不及待地想在接下来的几周内测试竞争对手。
价格和可用性
新的微星Titan GT77 HX 13 VI在微星的商店,售价5299美元.
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
- 02/07/2023 v7 (old)
Andreas Osthoff
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.