
配备出色迷你 LED 和 RTX 5090 的 18 英寸游戏本 - 华硕 Strix SCAR 18 G835LX 评测
适合游戏玩家和创意人士。
华硕更新了其游戏旗舰 Strix SCAR 18,配备了 Core Ultra 9 275HX、GeForce RTX 5090 笔记本电脑和出色的 240 Hz 迷你 LED 显示屏。此外,该设备组件的访问也变得更加方便,而且还有大量的照明元素。Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
结论:更强劲的动力、更时尚的外壳和出色的微型 LED 面板
ROG Strix SCAR 18 是华硕的游戏旗舰,这一点只要看一下它的技术数据就一目了然。它采用了最快的组件,即酷睿 Ultra 9 275HX 和GeForce RTX 5090 笔记本电脑,尽管与旧款 RTX 4090 笔记本电脑相比,它在游戏时的优势相对较小,尤其是在原生 WQHD 分辨率下。只有在使用 MFG4x 等升频方法时,新款 5090 笔记本电脑才能明显脱颖而出。对于配备 RTX 3000 GPU 的游戏笔记本电脑用户来说,升级无疑更有意义。
新款 5090 笔记本电脑的机箱也做了一些改动,整体设计变得更加整洁,同时还增加了全方位 LED 灯带和机盖上的 AniME Vision 显示屏。底座仍然由塑料制成,但不幸的是,顶部的光滑表面很快就会变脏。虽然我们的测试设备已经配备了相当完善的设备,但现在无需螺丝刀就能接触到组件,笔记本电脑的维护选项也非常出色。它的 RAID 0 固态硬盘组合并不完全理想,我们更希望使用快速 PCIe 5.0 插槽,因为这意味着使用单个硬盘可以获得更好的效果。
它的 240 赫兹微型 LED 显示屏几乎在所有方面都令人印象深刻,除了显示屏的纯粹规格外,华硕的附加模式也相当有趣。首先,它包括 P3 和 sRGB 的超精确出厂配置文件,你还可以停用局部调光进行图像编辑。在 HDR 模式下,还可以将苍白的 sRGB 色彩(当不显示 HDR 内容时,例如 Windows 桌面)转换为 P3 色彩空间。
这款笔记本电脑的缺点包括在性能模式和涡轮模式下散热噪音大,当然还有功耗高。此外,它的价格也非常高,尤其是我们的高端版本,价格约为 6,200 美元--至少还包括一些配件。不过,购买内存较少的廉价版,然后在必要时自己轻松扩展内存,这样做更有意义。
Strix SCAR 18 是我们测试的第一款 18 英寸新游戏笔记本电脑,但竞争对手的机型肯定会很快跟进,只有到那时我们才能确定新 SCAR 18 的性能如何。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
新款华硕 ROG Strix SCAR 18 可能将于 4 月底/5 月初上市。
ROG Strix SCAR 18 G835LX 是首款采用英特尔酷睿 Ultra 9 275HX 处理器的 18 英寸游戏笔记本电脑。 英特尔酷睿至尊9 275HX和 英伟达GeForce RTX 5090 笔记本电脑,也是华硕 2025 年的游戏旗舰。此外,该设备还拥有 240 Hz 的 mini LED 面板、64 GB 内存和 4-TB SSD 容量,售价约为 6200 元。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
规格
案例 - 光照充足,阴影较少
华硕对笔记本电脑的整个外壳进行了修改,其设计现在看起来更加时尚。机身底部的全方位 LED 灯带和机盖上的全新 AniME Vision 点阵显示屏都是全新设计。加上 RGB 键盘背光和 ROG 徽标,你可以在这里尽情发挥创意。AniME-Vision 显示屏是一个很好的噱头,除了现成的字母和动画外,您还可以使用自己的图片作为动画。
屏幕盖再次采用铝质材料,底座则使用塑料。机壳的整体稳定性非常好,但底座的光滑表面对指纹痕迹特别敏感,必须经常用湿布擦拭。铰链可将盖子牢牢固定在原位(最大开启角度 135 度),但在调整角度时无法完全避免轻微摇晃。总的来说,这款手机壳还不错,但对于一款高端产品来说,我们更希望它完全由金属制成。
在 18 英寸游戏机中,新款 Strix SCAR 18 相对小巧,重量仅为 3.3 千克,在重量方面也处于中场位置。380 瓦电源装置的重量增加了 986 克。
连接性 - 配备 Thunderbolt 5 的 SCAR 18
它的端口分布没有变化,但两个 USB-C 端口现在支持高达 120 GB/s 的 Thunderbolt 5。背面没有任何端口(如电源、显示屏、以太网)并不理想。由于笔记本电脑的 Arrow Lake NPU 性能较弱,因此不允许使用 Copilot+ 名称,但支持网络摄像头的 Studio Effects 或实时字幕等功能。
交流
除了 2.5 Gbit/s 以太网连接外,SCAR 18 还配备了包括蓝牙 5.4 在内的现代 Wi-Fi 7 模块。它与华硕参考路由器连接时的传输速率高且稳定。在我们的测试中,信号质量没有任何问题。
Networking | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Alienware m18 R2 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
网络摄像头
华硕笔记本电脑仍然配备了一个不带快门的 200 万像素网络摄像头,虽然可以完成工作,但你不应对其图像质量抱有过高期望。此外,还配备了一个红外摄像头,可通过 Windows Hello 进行面部识别。

配件
除了背包,我们的测试设备还配备了有线 ROG Fusion II 300 耳机、Gladius III 游戏鼠标和额外的 100 瓦 USB-C 电源。
维护
可持续性
华硕尚未对这款笔记本电脑的二氧化碳排放量或可回收材料的使用发表评论。它的包装几乎完全由纸张和纸板组成。
输入设备
显示屏 - 240 赫兹的超小型 LED 面板
Strix SCAR 18 的迷你 LED 面板分辨率为 2,560 x 1,600 像素(16:10),画质出色,即使是明亮的表面也不会出现颗粒感。得益于 240-Hz 的刷新率,动作看起来超级流畅。由于背光闪烁,我们无法通过测量方法可靠地确定微型 LED 面板的响应时间,因此我们提供的数值仅供参考。不过,华硕自己称其响应时间为 3 毫秒,我们在游戏时也没有遇到任何问题。
面板提供了一些有趣的功能和操作模式。在 SDR 模式下有三种图像模式可供选择,每种模式都能达到不同的最高亮度水平。你可以选择多重密集(激活本地调光,最大亮度 ~750 尼特)、多重平衡(激活本地调光,最大亮度 ~490 尼特)和单一图像控制(关闭本地调光,最大亮度 ~611 尼特)设置。单图像模式尤其适用于图像编辑,可确保整个屏幕表面亮度一致。在 HDR 模式下(最大亮度为 1,450 尼特,图像几乎全白),除了普通模式外,还可以选择 P3 模式,该模式会自动将非 HDR 内容(如桌面)从 sRGB 转换为 P3 色彩空间(尽管这会降低色彩准确度)。这避免了非 HDR 内容在 HDR 模式下显得非常苍白的问题。
该面板的另一个令人惊讶的特性是,在 SDR 模式下,即使激活了局部调光,其黑阶也不是 0。因此,会出现一些轻微的背光出血现象(尽管在局部调光模式下比单图像模式下的出血现象要少)。只有在 HDR 模式下,画面才是真正的全黑(黑度为 0)。
亮度约为 750 cd/m²,比去年略低,但仍然令人印象深刻。其黑度为 0.1 cd/m²,对比度超过 7000:1。在电池模式下,屏幕亮度不会降低。不过,亮度和色温都无法通过传感器自动调节。显示屏在任何亮度下都会闪烁,但频率很高,只有 20 千赫,不会造成任何问题。
|
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 764 cd/m²
Contrast: 7640:1 (Black: 0.1 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.88
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
87.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.17
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX N180QDM-NM2, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 18", 240 Hz | Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 BOE NE180QDM-NM1, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 18", 300 Hz | Alienware m18 R2 BOE NE18NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 18", 165 Hz | Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW B180QAN01.2 (AUO45A8), Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 18", 250 Hz | MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG AU Optronics B180ZAN01.0, Mini-LED, 3840x2400, 18", 120 Hz | SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) BOE, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3", 144 Hz | Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) BOE NE180QDM-NM1, Mini LED, 2560x1600, 18", 240 Hz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 0% | 0% | 2% | -1% | -3% | 1% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 99 | 99 0% | 97.8 -1% | 99.7 1% | 98.1 -1% | 93.51 -6% | 99.9 1% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 100 0% | 99.5 0% | 100 0% | 99.8 0% | 99.86 0% | 100 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 87.2 | 86.9 0% | 88.9 2% | 91.6 5% | 86.2 -1% | 84.33 -3% | 90 3% |
Response Times | -3% | 14% | -51% | -263% | -8% | -46% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 7.4 ? | 7.6 ? -3% | 5.3 ? 28% | 8 ? -8% | 8.6 ? -16% | 11.593 ? -57% | 12 ? -62% |
Response Time Black / White * | 10.4 ? | 14 ? -35% | 10.4 ? -0% | 17.6 ? -69% | 81.8 ? -687% | 6 ? 42% | 10.7 ? -3% |
PWM Frequency | 20610 ? | 26444 ? 28% | 4832 ? -77% | 2592 ? -87% | 5733 ? -72% | ||
Screen | -99% | -94% | -30% | -88% | -157% | 15% | |
Brightness middle | 764 | 605.4 -21% | 271.8 -64% | 722 -5% | 467.5 -39% | 548 -28% | 937 23% |
Brightness | 747 | 600 -20% | 275 -63% | 724 -3% | 459 -39% | 505 -32% | 934 25% |
Brightness Distribution | 93 | 97 4% | 78 -16% | 93 0% | 90 -3% | 86 -8% | 89 -4% |
Black Level * | 0.1 | 0.62 -520% | 0.27 -170% | 0.04 60% | 0.54 -440% | 0.066 34% | |
Contrast | 7640 | 976 -87% | 1007 -87% | 18050 136% | 1015 -87% | 14197 86% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.2 | 1.53 -28% | 2.48 -107% | 3.4 -183% | 3.77 -214% | 3.81 -218% | 1.52 -27% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.8 | 4.15 -48% | 5.59 -100% | 5.32 -90% | 6.12 -119% | 7.9 -182% | 2.82 -1% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.5 | 2.6 -73% | 3.7 -147% | 3.8 -153% | 3.2 -113% | 5.4 -260% | 1.7 -13% |
Gamma | 2.17 101% | 2.22 99% | 2.2 100% | 2.383 92% | 2.43 91% | 2.062 107% | 2.042 108% |
CCT | 6556 99% | 6843 95% | 6355 102% | 7051 92% | 6478 100% | 7224 90% | 6578 99% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.56 | 1.6 | 2.94 | 2.54 | 1.21 | ||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -34% /
-57% | -27% /
-56% | -26% /
-28% | -117% /
-110% | -56% /
-98% | -10% /
-1% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
10.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.6 ms rise | |
↘ 9.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 25 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.8 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
7.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2.4 ms rise | |
↘ 5 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.5 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 20610 Hz Amplitude: 100 % | ≤ 100 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 20610 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 20610 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8531 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
性能 - Arrow Lake-HX 和 RTX 5000 笔记本电脑
测试条件
华硕提供了三种能源配置文件,分别称为 "安静"、"性能"和 "涡轮加速",我们在以下基准测试和测量中使用了这三种配置文件。一般来说,我们希望性能和涡轮增压之间的差距更大一些。还提供了手动模式,可以提高 GPU 的时钟频率并影响风扇曲线。电池模式下无法使用Turbo模式。
能源概况 | CPU TDP | CB R24 Multi | GPU TGP | Time Spy 图形 | CP 2077 QHD | 最大风扇噪音排放 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
静音 | 100/65 瓦 | 1,825 分 | 55 瓦 | 9,029 分 | 43.5fps | 34.8 dB(A) |
性能 | 120/105 瓦 | 2,039 分 | 160 瓦 | 23,300 分 | 102.7fps | 49 dB(A) |
涡轮 | 175/150 瓦 | 2,223 点 | 175 瓦 | 24,599 瓦 | 106.8fps | 53.7 dB(A) |
处理器 - Core Ultra 9 275HX
新的 酷睿至尊 9 275HX作为笔记本电脑的处理器。它有 24 个内核(8 倍性能,16 倍效率),不带超线程,短时功耗可达 175 瓦,长期功耗可达 150 瓦。正如我们在 CPU,它在合成基准测试中的成绩非常好,与对比机型相比平均领先至少 11%,而与前代机型相比,我们甚至注意到领先 18%。在电池模式下,其功耗大幅降低(54/34 瓦),多核性能下降了 43%。
Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX | |
Alienware m18 R2 | |
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
Average of class Gaming |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (n=1) | |
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
Alienware m18 R2 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
Average of class Gaming (5668 - 39652, n=152, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (n=1) | |
Alienware m18 R2 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
Average of class Gaming (1136 - 2252, n=152, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (n=1) | |
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
Alienware m18 R2 | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 15517, n=152, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (n=1) | |
Alienware m18 R2 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
Average of class Gaming (439 - 866, n=152, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (n=1) | |
Alienware m18 R2 | |
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
Average of class Gaming (905 - 6074, n=156, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (n=1) | |
Alienware m18 R2 | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
Average of class Gaming (191.9 - 343, n=153, last 2 years) |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Average of class Gaming (81 - 555, n=146, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
Alienware m18 R2 | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (n=1) |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (n=1) | |
Alienware m18 R2 | |
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
Average of class Gaming (23795 - 144064, n=151, last 2 years) |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
Alienware m18 R2 | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (n=1) | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
Average of class Gaming (4199 - 7581, n=151, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW |
Geekbench 6.4 / Multi-Core | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (16033 - 21668, n=2) | |
Alienware m18 R2 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
Average of class Gaming (5340 - 21668, n=119, last 2 years) |
Geekbench 6.4 / Single-Core | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (3044 - 3158, n=2) | |
Alienware m18 R2 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
Average of class Gaming (1490 - 3219, n=119, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (n=1) | |
Alienware m18 R2 | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 25855, n=150, last 2 years) |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (n=1) | |
Alienware m18 R2 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2423, n=150, last 2 years) |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (n=1) | |
Alienware m18 R2 | |
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
Average of class Gaming (6.72 - 42.9, n=150, last 2 years) |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
Average of class Gaming (19 - 96.6, n=149, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
Alienware m18 R2 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (n=1) |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.759, n=152, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (n=1) | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
Alienware m18 R2 |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX | |
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
Alienware m18 R2 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
Average of class Gaming |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (n=1) | |
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
Alienware m18 R2 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
Average of class Gaming (4986 - 81639, n=149, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (n=1) | |
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
Alienware m18 R2 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
Average of class Gaming (25360 - 252486, n=149, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (n=1) | |
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
Alienware m18 R2 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
Average of class Gaming (1339 - 10389, n=149, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (n=1) | |
Alienware m18 R2 | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=149, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
Alienware m18 R2 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (n=1) | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
Average of class Gaming (4800 - 32988, n=149, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (n=1) | |
Alienware m18 R2 | |
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
Average of class Gaming (12321 - 134044, n=149, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (n=1) | |
Alienware m18 R2 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=149, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (n=1) | |
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
Alienware m18 R2 | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
Average of class Gaming (373 - 2531, n=149, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (n=1) | |
Alienware m18 R2 | |
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
Average of class Gaming (2540 - 43430, n=149, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (n=1) | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
Alienware m18 R2 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=149, last 2 years) | |
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG |
系统性能
Strix SCAR 18 是一款响应速度超快的系统,但其基准测试结果仅为平均水平。在启动游戏时,高级 Optimus 图形切换功能会导致短暂的挂起,但这是正常现象。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Alienware m18 R2 | |
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1) | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=135, last 2 years) |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
Alienware m18 R2 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1) | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12600, n=135, last 2 years) |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Alienware m18 R2 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=135, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1) |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1) | |
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
Alienware m18 R2 | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
Average of class Gaming (6807 - 18475, n=135, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
Alienware m18 R2 | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=116, last 2 years) | |
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1) | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
Alienware m18 R2 | |
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=116, last 2 years) | |
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
Alienware m18 R2 | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2660, n=116, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1) | |
Alienware m18 R2 | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=116, last 2 years) | |
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1) | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
Alienware m18 R2 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
Average of class Gaming (215 - 480, n=129, last 2 years) |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1) | |
Alienware m18 R2 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
Average of class Gaming (176.4 - 335, n=117, last 2 years) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Average of class Gaming (409 - 674, n=141, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
Alienware m18 R2 | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1) |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 8623 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (n=1) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
Alienware m18 R2 | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
Average of class Gaming (21750 - 94222, n=149, last 2 years) | |
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (n=1) | |
Alienware m18 R2 | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
Average of class Gaming (22956 - 102937, n=149, last 2 years) | |
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (n=1) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
Alienware m18 R2 | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
Average of class Gaming (22297 - 108954, n=149, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (n=1) | |
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=149, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
Alienware m18 R2 | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
Alienware m18 R2 | |
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
* ... smaller is better
Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
Strix SCAR 18 配备了全新的 GeForce RTX 5090 笔记本电脑配备 24GB VRAM,最高时钟频率达 2,340 MHz。它是速度最快的变体,TGP 为 175 瓦(150 瓦 + 25 瓦 Dynamic Boost)。我们已在我们的 GPU 分析.在合成基准测试中,新 SCAR 18 比老型号领先约 20%。在手动模式下,核心和显存时钟最高可提高 200 MHz,这使得Time Spy Graphics 的性能提高了约 25,200 分(与 Turbo 相比提高了 700 分)。GPU 的性能即使在长期负载的情况下也保持不变,但在电池模式下 GPU 的最大功耗为 55 瓦,因此在这种情况下 GPU 的性能明显降低(-64%)。
3DMark 11 Performance | 48486 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 38733 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 23130 points | |
Help |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | |
Average of class Gaming (10 - 95, n=145, last 2 years) | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (10 - 15, n=4) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
Alienware m18 R2 | |
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CUDA | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (16 - 153, n=3) | |
Average of class Gaming (16 - 175, n=147, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
Alienware m18 R2 | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
Average of class Gaming (123 - 962, n=152, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
Alienware m18 R2 | |
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (125 - 210, n=3) | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
总体而言,它的游戏性能非常出色,但在不进行升频的情况下,其原生性能的优势并不是最大的--尤其是与旧版的 GeForce RTX 4090 笔记本电脑-更新在此意义不大。如果您仍在使用 RTX-3000 代 GPU,如 RTX 3080 Ti.不过,如果你想玩要求苛刻的全光线追踪或路径追踪游戏,如《赛博朋克》或《艾伦-唤醒》,你将无法避免通过 DLSS4 进行升频,即使在 WQHD 分辨率下也是如此。有了帧生成技术,笔记本电脑的性能可以得到更显著的提升,我们的 GPU 分析.
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Alienware m18 R2 | |
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
Average of class Gaming (6.76 - 158, n=89, last 2 years) |
Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
Alienware m18 R2 | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
Average of class Gaming (34.5 - 208, n=56, last 2 years) |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
Alienware m18 R2 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 168.2, n=134, last 2 years) |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 2560x1440 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (98.6 - 110.6, n=4) | |
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
Alienware m18 R2 | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
Average of class Gaming (24.8 - 110, n=72, last 2 years) |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K DLSS | 4K | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 161.9 | 156.8 | 179.5 | ||||
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 240 | 210 | 200 | 186.6 | 179.9 | ||
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 233 | 231 | 199.3 | 162.4 | 101.3 | ||
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 163.4 | 158.1 | 121.7 | 94.8 | |||
Strange Brigade (2018) | 563 | 431 | 418 | 401 | 330 | 187.2 | |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 193.7 | 145.6 | 125.4 | 82.8 | |||
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 154.9 | 106.8 | 52.1 | ||||
Alan Wake 2 (2023) | 116.4 | 82.4 | 46 | ||||
F1 24 (2024) | 148 | 100 | 52 | ||||
Call of Duty Black Ops 6 (2024) | 147 | 117 | 79 | ||||
Indiana Jones and the Great Circle (2024) | 127.9 | 102.2 | 65 | ||||
Monster Hunter Wilds (2025) | 87.6 | 72 | 46.3 | ||||
Assassin's Creed Shadows (2025) | 65 | 51 | 36 |
排放量
噪音排放
Noise Level
Idle |
| 29.8 / 29.8 / 29.8 dB(A) |
Load |
| 42.9 / 53.7 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB | Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX | Alienware m18 R2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N | Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0) | MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0) | SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB | Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 5% | 8% | -14% | 7% | 5% | -2% | |
off / environment * | 23.3 | 23.4 -0% | 23.6 -1% | 25 -7% | 22.8 2% | 23.41 -0% | 24 -3% |
Idle Minimum * | 29.8 | 23.9 20% | 23.8 20% | 30 -1% | 23.8 20% | 25.33 15% | 27 9% |
Idle Average * | 29.8 | 28.2 5% | 26.1 12% | 36 -21% | 23.8 20% | 25.33 15% | 28 6% |
Idle Maximum * | 29.8 | 29 3% | 31.5 -6% | 44 -48% | 28 6% | 25.33 15% | 32 -7% |
Load Average * | 42.9 | 36.8 14% | 31.5 27% | 48 -12% | 38 11% | 33.57 22% | 50 -17% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 53.7 | 61.97 -15% | |||||
Load Maximum * | 53.7 | 61.1 -14% | 56.6 -5% | 51 5% | 62.8 -17% | 62.14 -16% | 52 3% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 54.1 | 52.1 | 49 | 57.3 | 50 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.6 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.8 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 34.4 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.2 °C / 84.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-0.3 °C / -0.6 F).
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | Alienware m18 R2 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -10% | -16% | -12% | -2% | -39% | -4% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 45.6 | 43.2 5% | 41.2 10% | 43 6% | 37.8 17% | 51 -12% | 49 -7% |
Maximum Bottom * | 46 | 42.6 7% | 34.6 25% | 59 -28% | 37.6 18% | 64 -39% | 47 -2% |
Idle Upper Side * | 28.9 | 36 -25% | 42.8 -48% | 32 -11% | 34.8 -20% | 42.3 -46% | 29 -0% |
Idle Bottom * | 29.2 | 36.4 -25% | 43.6 -49% | 34 -16% | 36 -23% | 46 -58% | 31 -6% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
该设备的音响系统由四个模块组成,性能尚可,但在我们的测试中,有更好的设备可与之相比。不过,由于风扇的声音太大,扬声器在游戏中的作用也不大。
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 13% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Alienware m18 R2 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 43% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 13% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 7.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
能源管理 - 电池寿命短
耗电量
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, WD PC SN8000S 2TB, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 18" | Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, , Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 18" | Alienware m18 R2 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N, IPS, 2560x1600, 18" | Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0), Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 18" | MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0), Mini-LED, 3840x2400, 18" | SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3" | Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB, Mini LED, 2560x1600, 18" | Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -22% | 8% | -26% | 0% | 24% | 23% | 20% | 29% | |
Idle Minimum * | 11.4 | 25.4 -123% | 10.6 7% | 31 -172% | 13.2 -16% | 12.16 -7% | 14 -23% | 11.2 ? 2% | 13.4 ? -18% |
Idle Average * | 39.2 | 37.7 4% | 20.9 47% | 35 11% | 25.4 35% | 15.97 59% | 17 57% | 26.4 ? 33% | 18.9 ? 52% |
Idle Maximum * | 40.2 | 57.9 -44% | 40 -0% | 43 -7% | 53.5 -33% | 23.71 41% | 24 40% | 27 ? 33% | 26.5 ? 34% |
Load Average * | 161.2 | 128.4 20% | 201.1 -25% | 144 11% | 151.4 6% | 113.06 30% | 143 11% | 140.7 ? 13% | 103.1 ? 36% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 303 | 274 10% | |||||||
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 295 | 280 5% | |||||||
Load Maximum * | 430.9 | 297.9 31% | 378.9 12% | 318 26% | 395.2 8% | 301 30% | 302 30% | 339 ? 21% | 246 ? 43% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 273.1 | 358 | 228 | 336 | 251 |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test
Power consumption with external monitor
运行时间
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 90 Wh | Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 91.7 Wh | Alienware m18 R2 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 97 Wh | Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh | SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99 Wh | Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -19% | -13% | -26% | -11% | 1% | 26% | 22% | |
H.264 | 347 | 447 29% | 444 ? 28% | |||||
WiFi v1.3 | 332 | 263 -21% | 290 -13% | 192 -42% | 252 -24% | 203 -39% | 461 39% | 384 ? 16% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra 150cd | 44 | 67 52% | ||||||
Load | 70 | 58 -17% | 64 -9% | 72 3% | 64 -9% | 77 10% | 84.6 ? 21% |
Notebookcheck 总评分
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
- 03/31/2025 v8
Andreas Osthoff
Possible alternatives compared
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX ⎘ Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop ⎘ 64 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $2,899.00 ASUS ROG Strix Scar 16 (2024... 2. $6.99 Keyboard Cover for 2025 2024... 3. $199.99 380W Charger for Asus ROG St... List Price: 5799€ | 3.3 kg | 32 mm | 18.00" 2560x1600 168 PPI Mini-LED | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 Intel Core i9-14900HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory | Amazon: $4,899.99 List Price: 4500 USD | 3.1 kg | 21.9 mm | 18.00" 2560x1600 168 PPI Mini-LED | |
Alienware m18 R2 Intel Core i9-14900HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $2,799.99 Alienware M18 R2 Gaming Lapt... 2. $4,799.99 Alienware Dell M18 R2 Gaming... 3. $2,399.00 NewDell Alien.Ware M18 R2 Ga... List Price: 3300 USD | 4 kg | 26.7 mm | 18.00" 2560x1600 168 PPI IPS | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Core i9-14900HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $99.99 330W Genuine Charger for Ace... 2. $99.99 330W Genuine Charger for Ace... 3. $154.00 Accessories Compatible for A... | 3.3 kg | 29.5 mm | 18.00" 2560x1600 168 PPI Mini-LED | |
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU ⎘ 128 GB Memory, 4096 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $813.96 Factory Original 128GB (4x32... 2. $36.99 Artemis Shields Anti Glare M... 3. $159.99 400W Charger for Msi Titan 1... List Price: 5000 USD | 3.6 kg | 32.1 mm | 18.00" 3840x2400 252 PPI Mini-LED | |
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) Intel Core i9-14900HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | List Price: 4273€ | 3.4 kg | 24.9 mm | 17.30" 3840x2160 255 PPI IPS |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.