Notebookcheck Logo
Teaser

配备出色迷你 LED 和 RTX 5090 的 18 英寸游戏本 - 华硕 Strix SCAR 18 G835LX 评测

适合游戏玩家和创意人士。

华硕更新了其游戏旗舰 Strix SCAR 18,配备了 Core Ultra 9 275HX、GeForce RTX 5090 笔记本电脑和出色的 240 Hz 迷你 LED 显示屏。此外,该设备组件的访问也变得更加方便,而且还有大量的照明元素。
Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
AI Blackwell RTX 5000 Arrow Lake Intel Laptop / Notebook Windows Wi-Fi 7 Thunderbolt

结论:更强劲的动力、更时尚的外壳和出色的微型 LED 面板

ROG Strix SCAR 18 是华硕的游戏旗舰,这一点只要看一下它的技术数据就一目了然。它采用了最快的组件,即酷睿 Ultra 9 275HX 和GeForce RTX 5090 笔记本电脑,尽管与旧款 RTX 4090 笔记本电脑相比,它在游戏时的优势相对较小,尤其是在原生 WQHD 分辨率下。只有在使用 MFG4x 等升频方法时,新款 5090 笔记本电脑才能明显脱颖而出。对于配备 RTX 3000 GPU 的游戏笔记本电脑用户来说,升级无疑更有意义。

新款 5090 笔记本电脑的机箱也做了一些改动,整体设计变得更加整洁,同时还增加了全方位 LED 灯带和机盖上的 AniME Vision 显示屏。底座仍然由塑料制成,但不幸的是,顶部的光滑表面很快就会变脏。虽然我们的测试设备已经配备了相当完善的设备,但现在无需螺丝刀就能接触到组件,笔记本电脑的维护选项也非常出色。它的 RAID 0 固态硬盘组合并不完全理想,我们更希望使用快速 PCIe 5.0 插槽,因为这意味着使用单个硬盘可以获得更好的效果。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

它的 240 赫兹微型 LED 显示屏几乎在所有方面都令人印象深刻,除了显示屏的纯粹规格外,华硕的附加模式也相当有趣。首先,它包括 P3 和 sRGB 的超精确出厂配置文件,你还可以停用局部调光进行图像编辑。在 HDR 模式下,还可以将苍白的 sRGB 色彩(当不显示 HDR 内容时,例如 Windows 桌面)转换为 P3 色彩空间。

这款笔记本电脑的缺点包括在性能模式和涡轮模式下散热噪音大,当然还有功耗高。此外,它的价格也非常高,尤其是我们的高端版本,价格约为 6,200 美元--至少还包括一些配件。不过,购买内存较少的廉价版,然后在必要时自己轻松扩展内存,这样做更有意义。

Strix SCAR 18 是我们测试的第一款 18 英寸新游戏笔记本电脑,但竞争对手的机型肯定会很快跟进,只有到那时我们才能确定新 SCAR 18 的性能如何。

Pros

+ 极高的游戏/系统性能
+ RTX 5090 笔记本电脑,功率为 175 瓦
+ 令人惊叹的迷你 LED 面板
+ 2x 雷电 5
+ 非常好的维护选项
+ 大量照明元素
+ 丰富的配件(取决于型号)
+ 舒适的键盘

Cons

- 游戏时风扇噪音大
- 无 PCIe 5.0
- 塑料底座易留下指纹痕迹
- 功耗高
- 背面无连接

价格和供应情况

新款华硕 ROG Strix SCAR 18 可能将于 4 月底/5 月初上市。

ROG Strix SCAR 18 G835LX 是首款采用英特尔酷睿 Ultra 9 275HX 处理器的 18 英寸游戏笔记本电脑。 英特尔酷睿至尊9 275HX英伟达GeForce RTX 5090 笔记本电脑,也是华硕 2025 年的游戏旗舰。此外,该设备还拥有 240 Hz 的 mini LED 面板、64 GB 内存和 4-TB SSD 容量,售价约为 6200 元。

规格

Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Processor
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX 24 x 2.1 - 5.4 GHz, 175 W PL2 / Short Burst, 150 W PL1 / Sustained, Arrow Lake-HX
Graphics adapter
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop - 24 GB VRAM, Core: 2340 MHz, RAM: 1750 MHz, 175 W TDP ( including 25 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR7, 572.84, Advanced Optimus
Memory
64 GB 
, DDR5-5600, Dual-Channel, 2 slots
Display
18.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 168 PPI, N180QDM-NM2, Mini-LED, glossy: no, HDR, 240 Hz
Mainboard
Intel HM870 (Arrow Lake-HX PCH)
Storage
WD PC SN8000S 2TB, 2048 GB 
, 2x SN8000S 2TB (RAID 0), 3686 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Arrow Lake-S PCH - ACE (Audio Context Engine)
Connections
3 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm Stereo
Networking
Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 32 x 399 x 298
Battery
90 Wh, 5600 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webcam: 1080p + IR
Primary Camera: 2 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: 4-speaker system, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 380W PSU, ROG Fusion II 300 Headset, Backpack, Armoury Crate, 3-month Xbox Game Pass, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
3.307 kg, Power Supply: 986 g
Price
5799 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

案例 - 光照充足,阴影较少

盖子上的 AniME Vision 显示屏
盖子上的 AniME Vision 显示屏

华硕对笔记本电脑的整个外壳进行了修改,其设计现在看起来更加时尚。机身底部的全方位 LED 灯带和机盖上的全新 AniME Vision 点阵显示屏都是全新设计。加上 RGB 键盘背光和 ROG 徽标,你可以在这里尽情发挥创意。AniME-Vision 显示屏是一个很好的噱头,除了现成的字母和动画外,您还可以使用自己的图片作为动画。

屏幕盖再次采用铝质材料,底座则使用塑料。机壳的整体稳定性非常好,但底座的光滑表面对指纹痕迹特别敏感,必须经常用湿布擦拭。铰链可将盖子牢牢固定在原位(最大开启角度 135 度),但在调整角度时无法完全避免轻微摇晃。总的来说,这款手机壳还不错,但对于一款高端产品来说,我们更希望它完全由金属制成。

在 18 英寸游戏机中,新款 Strix SCAR 18 相对小巧,重量仅为 3.3 千克,在重量方面也处于中场位置。380 瓦电源装置的重量增加了 986 克。

尺寸比较

410.3 mm 319.9 mm 26.7 mm 4 kg404 mm 307.5 mm 32.1 mm 3.6 kg405 mm 312 mm 29.5 mm 3.3 kg399 mm 298 mm 32 mm 3.3 kg399 mm 294 mm 30.8 mm 3.1 kg399.9 mm 275.4 mm 21.9 mm 3.1 kg396 mm 278 mm 24.9 mm 3.4 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

连接性 - 配备 Thunderbolt 5 的 SCAR 18

它的端口分布没有变化,但两个 USB-C 端口现在支持高达 120 GB/s 的 Thunderbolt 5。背面没有任何端口(如电源、显示屏、以太网)并不理想。由于笔记本电脑的 Arrow Lake NPU 性能较弱,因此不允许使用 Copilot+ 名称,但支持网络摄像头的 Studio Effects 或实时字幕等功能。

左:电源、千兆以太网、HDMI 2.1、USB-A 3.2 Gen 2(10 Gbit/s)、3.5 毫米音频
左:电源、千兆以太网、HDMI 2.1、USB-A 3.2 Gen 2(10 Gbit/s)、3.5 毫米音频
右:2 个 USB-A 3.2 Gen 2(10 Gbit/秒)
右:2 个 USB-A 3.2 Gen 2(10 Gbit/秒)

交流

除了 2.5 Gbit/s 以太网连接外,SCAR 18 还配备了包括蓝牙 5.4 在内的现代 Wi-Fi 7 模块。它与华硕参考路由器连接时的传输速率高且稳定。在我们的测试中,信号质量没有任何问题。

Networking
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1660 (min: 1544) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1588 (min: 1563) MBit/s ∼94%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1143 (min: 813) MBit/s ∼69%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1459 (min: 1375) MBit/s ∼87%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1199 (min: 1057) MBit/s ∼73%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1315 (min: 1269) MBit/s ∼77%
Alienware m18 R2
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750x BE200NGW
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
791 (min: 736) MBit/s ∼48%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1381 (min: 1277) MBit/s ∼82%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
648 (min: 595) MBit/s ∼40%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1292 (min: 1215) MBit/s ∼75%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750W 320 MHz (BE200NGW)
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
831 (min: 611) MBit/s ∼50%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1589 (min: 1385) MBit/s ∼95%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750x BE200NGW
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1011 (min: 514) MBit/s ∼61%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1116 (min: 932) MBit/s ∼66%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1096 (min: 900) MBit/s ∼67%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1379 (min: 709) MBit/s ∼80%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
916 (min: 448) MBit/s ∼55%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
951 (min: 473) MBit/s ∼57%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1634 (min: 812) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1714 (min: 853) MBit/s ∼100%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
968 (min: 656) MBit/s ∼58%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1681 (min: 1662) MBit/s ∼100%
05010015020025030035040045050055060065070075080085090095010001050110011501200125013001350140014501500155016001650170017501800Tooltip
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1660 (1544-1812)
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1588 (1563-1610)

网络摄像头

华硕笔记本电脑仍然配备了一个不带快门的 200 万像素网络摄像头,虽然可以完成工作,但你不应对其图像质量抱有过高期望。此外,还配备了一个红外摄像头,可通过 Windows Hello 进行面部识别。

ColorChecker
7.5 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
6 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
13 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX: 8.5 ∆E min: 2.75 - max: 13.42 ∆E

配件

除了背包,我们的测试设备还配备了有线 ROG Fusion II 300 耳机、Gladius III 游戏鼠标和额外的 100 瓦 USB-C 电源。

维护

华硕使设备部件的接触变得更加容易。下底板可通过滑块解锁,然后向前拉出即可。这样就可以接触到两个 M.2 2280 固态硬盘、两个 SO-DIMM 插槽和风扇。更换旋入式电池需要进一步拆卸。

用于解锁底板的滑块
用于解锁底板的滑块
内部建设
内部建设
2x SO-DIMM 插槽
2x SO-DIMM 插槽

可持续性

华硕尚未对这款笔记本电脑的二氧化碳排放量或可回收材料的使用发表评论。它的包装几乎完全由纸张和纸板组成。

输入设备

该设备带有数字键盘的大键盘输入感觉舒适,键程充足,敲击精准。机械键盘在这方面更胜一筹,而 Strix SCAR 18 的键盘则要安静得多。每个按键的背光都可以单独设置。宽大的玻璃触摸板(13.5 x 8 厘米)手感舒适顺滑,下部区域的点击声非常清晰、低沉。

输入设备
输入设备
键盘背光
键盘背光

显示屏 - 240 赫兹的超小型 LED 面板

子像素阵列
子像素阵列
背光出血(仅在 SDR 模式下)
背光出血(仅在 SDR 模式下)

Strix SCAR 18 的迷你 LED 面板分辨率为 2,560 x 1,600 像素(16:10),画质出色,即使是明亮的表面也不会出现颗粒感。得益于 240-Hz 的刷新率,动作看起来超级流畅。由于背光闪烁,我们无法通过测量方法可靠地确定微型 LED 面板的响应时间,因此我们提供的数值仅供参考。不过,华硕自己称其响应时间为 3 毫秒,我们在游戏时也没有遇到任何问题。

面板提供了一些有趣的功能和操作模式。在 SDR 模式下有三种图像模式可供选择,每种模式都能达到不同的最高亮度水平。你可以选择多重密集(激活本地调光,最大亮度 ~750 尼特)、多重平衡(激活本地调光,最大亮度 ~490 尼特)和单一图像控制(关闭本地调光,最大亮度 ~611 尼特)设置。单图像模式尤其适用于图像编辑,可确保整个屏幕表面亮度一致。在 HDR 模式下(最大亮度为 1,450 尼特,图像几乎全白),除了普通模式外,还可以选择 P3 模式,该模式会自动将非 HDR 内容(如桌面)从 sRGB 转换为 P3 色彩空间(尽管这会降低色彩准确度)。这避免了非 HDR 内容在 HDR 模式下显得非常苍白的问题。

该面板的另一个令人惊讶的特性是,在 SDR 模式下,即使激活了局部调光,其黑阶也不是 0。因此,会出现一些轻微的背光出血现象(尽管在局部调光模式下比单图像模式下的出血现象要少)。只有在 HDR 模式下,画面才是真正的全黑(黑度为 0)。

亮度约为 750 cd/m²,比去年略低,但仍然令人印象深刻。其黑度为 0.1 cd/m²,对比度超过 7000:1。在电池模式下,屏幕亮度不会降低。不过,亮度和色温都无法通过传感器自动调节。显示屏在任何亮度下都会闪烁,但频率很高,只有 20 千赫,不会造成任何问题。

746
cd/m²
767
cd/m²
757
cd/m²
723
cd/m²
764
cd/m²
749
cd/m²
715
cd/m²
759
cd/m²
747
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
N180QDM-NM2 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 767 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 747.4 cd/m² Minimum: 33 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 764 cd/m²
Contrast: 7640:1 (Black: 0.1 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.88
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
87.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.17
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
N180QDM-NM2, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 18", 240 Hz
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
BOE NE180QDM-NM1, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 18", 300 Hz
Alienware m18 R2
BOE NE18NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 18", 165 Hz
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
B180QAN01.2 (AUO45A8), Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 18", 250 Hz
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
AU Optronics B180ZAN01.0, Mini-LED, 3840x2400, 18", 120 Hz
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)
BOE, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3", 144 Hz
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
BOE NE180QDM-NM1, Mini LED, 2560x1600, 18", 240 Hz
Display
0%
0%
2%
-1%
-3%
1%
Display P3 Coverage
99
99
0%
97.8
-1%
99.7
1%
98.1
-1%
93.51
-6%
99.9
1%
sRGB Coverage
100
100
0%
99.5
0%
100
0%
99.8
0%
99.86
0%
100
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
87.2
86.9
0%
88.9
2%
91.6
5%
86.2
-1%
84.33
-3%
90
3%
Response Times
-3%
14%
-51%
-263%
-8%
-46%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
7.4 ?(2.4, 5)
7.6 ?(3.6, 4)
-3%
5.3 ?(2.2, 3.1)
28%
8 ?(4.9, 3.1)
-8%
8.6 ?(4.2, 4.4)
-16%
11.593 ?(5.307, 6.286)
-57%
12 ?(8, 4)
-62%
Response Time Black / White *
10.4 ?(0.6, 9.8)
14 ?(6.6, 7.4)
-35%
10.4 ?(4.8, 5.6)
-0%
17.6 ?(15.2, 2.4)
-69%
81.8 ?(76, 5.8)
-687%
6 ?(1.5, 4.5)
42%
10.7 ?(7.6, 3.1)
-3%
PWM Frequency
20610 ?(100)
26444 ?(100)
28%
4832 ?(100)
-77%
2592 ?(100)
-87%
5733 ?(94)
-72%
Screen
-99%
-94%
-30%
-88%
-157%
15%
Brightness middle
764
605.4
-21%
271.8
-64%
722
-5%
467.5
-39%
548
-28%
937
23%
Brightness
747
600
-20%
275
-63%
724
-3%
459
-39%
505
-32%
934
25%
Brightness Distribution
93
97
4%
78
-16%
93
0%
90
-3%
86
-8%
89
-4%
Black Level *
0.1
0.62
-520%
0.27
-170%
0.04
60%
0.54
-440%
0.066
34%
Contrast
7640
976
-87%
1007
-87%
18050
136%
1015
-87%
14197
86%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.2
1.53
-28%
2.48
-107%
3.4
-183%
3.77
-214%
3.81
-218%
1.52
-27%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.8
4.15
-48%
5.59
-100%
5.32
-90%
6.12
-119%
7.9
-182%
2.82
-1%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.5
2.6
-73%
3.7
-147%
3.8
-153%
3.2
-113%
5.4
-260%
1.7
-13%
Gamma
2.17 101%
2.22 99%
2.2 100%
2.383 92%
2.43 91%
2.062 107%
2.042 108%
CCT
6556 99%
6843 95%
6355 102%
7051 92%
6478 100%
7224 90%
6578 99%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
0.56
1.6
2.94
2.54
1.21
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-34% / -57%
-27% / -56%
-26% / -28%
-117% / -110%
-56% / -98%
-10% / -1%

* ... smaller is better

CalMAN 灰度(配置文件:显示 P3,目标色彩空间:P3)
CalMAN 灰度(配置文件:显示 P3,目标色彩空间:P3)
CalMAN 饱和度(配置文件:显示 P3,目标色彩空间:P3)
CalMAN 饱和度(配置文件:显示 P3,目标色彩空间:P3)
CalMAN ColorChecker(配置文件:显示 P3,目标色彩空间:P3)
CalMAN ColorChecker(配置文件:显示 P3,目标色彩空间:P3)
CalMAN 灰度(配置文件:原生,目标色彩空间:P3)
CalMAN 灰度(配置文件:原生,目标色彩空间:P3)
CalMAN 饱和度(配置文件:原生,目标色彩空间:P3)
CalMAN 饱和度(配置文件:原生,目标色彩空间:P3)
CalMAN ColorChecker(配置文件:原生,目标色彩空间:P3)
CalMAN ColorChecker(配置文件:原生,目标色彩空间:P3)

华硕一如既往地为 SDR 模式提供了各种色彩配置文件。原生模式有些过饱和,但也有非常精确的 P3 和 sRGB 配置文件。我们无法通过自己的校准进一步改善显示效果。

CalMAN 灰度(配置文件:sRGB,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
CalMAN 灰度(配置文件:sRGB,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
CalMAN 饱和度(配置文件:sRGB,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
CalMAN 饱和度(配置文件:sRGB,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
CalMAN ColorChecker(配置文件:sRGB,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
CalMAN ColorChecker(配置文件:sRGB,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
对比 sRGB
对比 sRGB
对 P3
对 P3
对比 AdobeRGB
对比 AdobeRGB

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
10.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.6 ms rise
↘ 9.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 25 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
7.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.4 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.5 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 20610 Hz
Amplitude: 100 %
≤ 100 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 20610 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 20610 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8531 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

PWM 闪烁(亮度为 0)
PWM 闪烁(亮度为 0)
PWM 闪烁(亮度为 20)
PWM 闪烁(亮度为 20)
PWM 闪烁(亮度为 40)
PWM 闪烁(亮度为 40)
PWM 闪烁(亮度为 60)
PWM 闪烁(亮度为 60)
PWM 闪烁(亮度为 80)
PWM 闪烁(亮度为 80)
PWM 闪烁(亮度为 100)
PWM 闪烁(亮度为 100)
在阳光下
在阳光下
室外(明亮的白天,无阳光直射)
室外(明亮的白天,无阳光直射)
视角稳定性
视角稳定性

性能 - Arrow Lake-HX 和 RTX 5000 笔记本电脑

 
 
 

测试条件

华硕提供了三种能源配置文件,分别称为 "安静"、"性能"和 "涡轮加速",我们在以下基准测试和测量中使用了这三种配置文件。一般来说,我们希望性能涡轮增压之间的差距更大一些。还提供了手动模式,可以提高 GPU 的时钟频率并影响风扇曲线。电池模式下无法使用Turbo模式。

能源概况 CPU TDP CB R24 Multi GPU TGP Time Spy 图形 CP 2077 QHD 最大风扇噪音排放
静音 100/65 瓦 1,825 分 55 瓦 9,029 分 43.5fps 34.8 dB(A)
性能 120/105 瓦 2,039 分 160 瓦 23,300 分 102.7fps 49 dB(A)
涡轮 175/150 瓦 2,223 点 175 瓦 24,599 瓦 106.8fps 53.7 dB(A)

处理器 - Core Ultra 9 275HX

新的 酷睿至尊 9 275HX作为笔记本电脑的处理器。它有 24 个内核(8 倍性能,16 倍效率),不带超线程,短时功耗可达 175 瓦,长期功耗可达 150 瓦。正如我们在 CPU,它在合成基准测试中的成绩非常好,与对比机型相比平均领先至少 11%,而与前代机型相比,我们甚至注意到领先 18%。在电池模式下,其功耗大幅降低(54/34 瓦),多核性能下降了 43%。

Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test

03056109151220152518302135244027453050335536603965427045754880518554905795Tooltip
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX: Ø5942 (5879.76-6059.69)
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø4163 (3956.09-4227.88)
Alienware m18 R2 Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø4743 (4458.81-4807.11)
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø4064 (3787.52-4673.44)
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø4753 (4700.35-4782.4)
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø3786 (3488.57-4363)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø4024 (3961.18-4098.11)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
88.1 pt
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
 
87.2 pt
Alienware m18 R2
Intel Core i9-14900HX
79.1 pt
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
Intel Core i9-14900HX
75.8 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
74.6 pt
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX
71.9 pt
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
70.1 pt
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
Intel Core i9-14900HX
69.3 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
59.6 pt
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
39001 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (n=1)
39001 Points 0%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
Intel Core i9-14900HX
32428 (29693.8min - 32428.3max) Points -17%
Alienware m18 R2
Intel Core i9-14900HX
31391 (28656min - 31390.7max) Points -20%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
28516 Points -27%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX
27657 (23328.1min - 27657.5max) Points -29%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
27338 Points -30%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
Intel Core i9-14900HX
26171 Points -33%
Average of class Gaming
  (5668 - 39652, n=152, last 2 years)
21290 Points -45%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
2252 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (n=1)
2252 Points 0%
Alienware m18 R2
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2235 Points -1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2177 Points -3%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2176 Points -3%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2143 Points -5%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2088 Points -7%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2028 Points -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (1136 - 2252, n=152, last 2 years)
1879 Points -17%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
15517 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (n=1)
15517 Points 0%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
Intel Core i9-14900HX
12103 Points -22%
Alienware m18 R2
Intel Core i9-14900HX
11816 Points -24%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX
10871 Points -30%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
10787 Points -30%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
10276 Points -34%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
Intel Core i9-14900HX
9881 Points -36%
Average of class Gaming
  (2179 - 15517, n=152, last 2 years)
8151 Points -47%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
866 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (n=1)
866 Points 0%
Alienware m18 R2
Intel Core i9-14900HX
853 Points -2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
833 Points -4%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
Intel Core i9-14900HX
832 Points -4%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
Intel Core i9-14900HX
823 Points -5%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX
814 Points -6%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
779 Points -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (439 - 866, n=152, last 2 years)
723 Points -17%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
6060 (5879.76min - 6059.69max) Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (n=1)
6060 Points 0%
Alienware m18 R2
Intel Core i9-14900HX
4807 (4458.81min - 4807.11max) Points -21%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
Intel Core i9-14900HX
4782 (4700.35min - 4782.4max) Points -21%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
Intel Core i9-14900HX
4673 (3787.52min - 4673.44max) Points -23%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
4363 (3488.57min - 4363max) Points -28%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX
4228 (3956.09min - 4227.88max) Points -30%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
4098 Points -32%
Average of class Gaming
  (905 - 6074, n=156, last 2 years)
3306 Points -45%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
343 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (n=1)
343 Points 0%
Alienware m18 R2
Intel Core i9-14900HX
318 Points -7%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
Intel Core i9-14900HX
312 Points -9%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX
304 Points -11%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
302 Points -12%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
Intel Core i9-14900HX
300 Points -13%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
288 Points -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (191.9 - 343, n=153, last 2 years)
277 Points -19%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average of class Gaming
  (81 - 555, n=146, last 2 years)
175.7 Seconds * -102%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
Intel Core i9-14900HX
125 Seconds * -44%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
121 Seconds * -39%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
118 Seconds * -36%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX
117 Seconds * -34%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
Intel Core i9-14900HX
104 Seconds * -20%
Alienware m18 R2
Intel Core i9-14900HX
102 Seconds * -17%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
87 Seconds *
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (n=1)
87 Seconds * -0%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
122818 MIPS
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (n=1)
122818 MIPS 0%
Alienware m18 R2
Intel Core i9-14900HX
122772 MIPS 0%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
Intel Core i9-14900HX
121266 MIPS -1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
114546 MIPS -7%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
109204 MIPS -11%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX
107527 MIPS -12%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
Intel Core i9-14900HX
106977 MIPS -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (23795 - 144064, n=151, last 2 years)
82839 MIPS -33%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
7172 MIPS +2%
Alienware m18 R2
Intel Core i9-14900HX
7103 MIPS +1%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
7027 MIPS
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (n=1)
7027 MIPS 0%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
6858 MIPS -2%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
Intel Core i9-14900HX
6504 MIPS -7%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX
6497 MIPS -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (4199 - 7581, n=151, last 2 years)
6262 MIPS -11%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
Intel Core i9-14900HX
6206 MIPS -12%
Geekbench 6.4 / Multi-Core
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
21668 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (16033 - 21668, n=2)
18851 Points -13%
Alienware m18 R2
Intel Core i9-14900HX
18233 Points -16%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
17695 Points -18%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
Intel Core i9-14900HX
17403 Points -20%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX
17231 Points -20%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
Intel Core i9-14900HX
16652 Points -23%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
16482 Points -24%
Average of class Gaming
  (5340 - 21668, n=119, last 2 years)
14251 Points -34%
Geekbench 6.4 / Single-Core
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
3158 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (3044 - 3158, n=2)
3101 Points -2%
Alienware m18 R2
Intel Core i9-14900HX
3057 Points -3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2999 Points -5%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2965 Points -6%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2843 Points -10%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2842 Points -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (1490 - 3219, n=119, last 2 years)
2658 Points -16%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2611 Points -17%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
25855 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (n=1)
25855 Points 0%
Alienware m18 R2
Intel Core i9-14900HX
21284 Points -18%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
Intel Core i9-14900HX
20029 Points -23%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
19975 Points -23%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
19316 Points -25%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX
19310 Points -25%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
Intel Core i9-14900HX
19137 Points -26%
Average of class Gaming
  (4557 - 25855, n=150, last 2 years)
14638 Points -43%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
2292 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (n=1)
2292 Points 0%
Alienware m18 R2
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2193 Points -4%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2118 Points -8%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2098 Points -8%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2015 Points -12%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2009 Points -12%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
1924 Points -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (986 - 2423, n=150, last 2 years)
1891 Points -17%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
41.2 fps
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (n=1)
41.2 fps 0%
Alienware m18 R2
Intel Core i9-14900HX
32.1 fps -22%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
Intel Core i9-14900HX
30.9 fps -25%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
Intel Core i9-14900HX
29.5 fps -28%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
29.2 fps -29%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX
27.7 fps -33%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
27.1 fps -34%
Average of class Gaming
  (6.72 - 42.9, n=150, last 2 years)
23.2 fps -44%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
Intel Core i9-14900HX
85.1 s * -106%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX
48.5 s * -17%
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 96.6, n=149, last 2 years)
47.4 s * -15%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
46.6 s * -13%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
Intel Core i9-14900HX
46.2 s * -12%
Alienware m18 R2
Intel Core i9-14900HX
44.8 s * -8%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
43.8 s * -6%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
41.3 s *
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (n=1)
41.3 s * -0%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 0.759, n=152, last 2 years)
0.4403 sec * -12%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
Intel Core i9-14900HX
0.4225 sec * -7%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
0.4143 sec * -5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
0.3944 sec * -0%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
0.3943 sec *
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (n=1)
0.3943 sec * -0%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX
0.3937 sec * -0%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
Intel Core i9-14900HX
0.3919 sec * +1%
Alienware m18 R2
Intel Core i9-14900HX
0.3767 sec * +4%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
287 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
343 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
6060 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
15517 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
866 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
39001 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
2252 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
2223 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
138 Points
Help
Performance Rating
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
96.8 pt
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
 
96.8 pt
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
82.9 pt
Alienware m18 R2
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
82.8 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
76.1 pt
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
74.5 pt
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
71.5 pt
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
69.2 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
63.1 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
39458 KRay/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (n=1)
39458 KRay/s 0%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
29351 KRay/s -26%
Alienware m18 R2
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
29280 KRay/s -26%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
25444 KRay/s -36%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
25098 KRay/s -36%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
23862 KRay/s -40%
Average of class Gaming
  (4986 - 81639, n=149, last 2 years)
22617 KRay/s -43%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
21858 KRay/s -45%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
194867 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (n=1)
194867 Points 0%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
148888 Points -24%
Alienware m18 R2
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
142791 Points -27%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
128826 Points -34%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
128369 Points -34%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
118469 Points -39%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
113270 Points -42%
Average of class Gaming
  (25360 - 252486, n=149, last 2 years)
107682 Points -45%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
9482 MB/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (n=1)
9482 MB/s 0%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
7229 MB/s -24%
Alienware m18 R2
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
7095 MB/s -25%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
6204 MB/s -35%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
6159 MB/s -35%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
5804 MB/s -39%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
5598 MB/s -41%
Average of class Gaming
  (1339 - 10389, n=149, last 2 years)
4887 MB/s -48%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
148773 Points +7%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
141681 Points +1%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
139608 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (n=1)
139608 Points 0%
Alienware m18 R2
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
139323 Points 0%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
139146 Points 0%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
138708 Points -1%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
136621 Points -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (50699 - 200651, n=149, last 2 years)
115667 Points -17%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
18256 Points +29%
Alienware m18 R2
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
16279 Points +15%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
16121 Points +14%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
15500 Points +10%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
15099 Points +7%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
14112 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (n=1)
14112 Points 0%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
13903 Points -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (4800 - 32988, n=149, last 2 years)
13382 Points -5%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
104057 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (n=1)
104057 Points 0%
Alienware m18 R2
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
72594 Points -30%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
72355 Points -30%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
63748 Points -39%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
62867 Points -40%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
59005 Points -43%
Average of class Gaming
  (12321 - 134044, n=149, last 2 years)
54498 Points -48%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
54428 Points -48%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
138830 MB/s +3%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
134920 MB/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (n=1)
134920 MB/s 0%
Alienware m18 R2
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
134675 MB/s 0%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
122250 MB/s -9%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
117887 MB/s -13%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
112197 MB/s -17%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
106371 MB/s -21%
Average of class Gaming
  (19065 - 328679, n=149, last 2 years)
105228 MB/s -22%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
2220 MB/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (n=1)
2220 MB/s 0%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
2149 MB/s -3%
Alienware m18 R2
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
2053 MB/s -8%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
1794 MB/s -19%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
1789 MB/s -19%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
1696 MB/s -24%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
1691 MB/s -24%
Average of class Gaming
  (373 - 2531, n=149, last 2 years)
1341 MB/s -40%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
21372 KRay/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (n=1)
21372 KRay/s 0%
Alienware m18 R2
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
16128 KRay/s -25%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
16104 KRay/s -25%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
13680 KRay/s -36%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
13608 KRay/s -36%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
12565 KRay/s -41%
Average of class Gaming
  (2540 - 43430, n=149, last 2 years)
12143 KRay/s -43%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
11838 KRay/s -45%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
56601 MPixel/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (n=1)
56601 MPixel/s 0%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
50465 MPixel/s -11%
Alienware m18 R2
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
49716 MPixel/s -12%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
49710 MPixel/s -12%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
47472 MPixel/s -16%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
47343 MPixel/s -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (10805 - 60161, n=149, last 2 years)
39836 MPixel/s -30%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
33960 MPixel/s -40%

系统性能

Strix SCAR 18 是一款响应速度超快的系统,但其基准测试结果仅为平均水平。在启动游戏时,高级 Optimus 图形切换功能会导致短暂的挂起,但这是正常现象。

PCMark 10 / Score
Alienware m18 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N
9234 Points +7%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)
8968 Points +4%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
8805 Points +2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
8801 Points +2%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB
8623 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (n=1)
8623 Points 0%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
8277 Points -4%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)
8230 Points -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (5776 - 9852, n=135, last 2 years)
7821 Points -9%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)
11628 Points +6%
Alienware m18 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N
11415 Points +4%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
11394 Points +4%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
11378 Points +4%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)
11032 Points +1%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB
10966 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (n=1)
10966 Points 0%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
10778 Points -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (9057 - 12600, n=135, last 2 years)
10742 Points -2%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Alienware m18 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N
11415 Points +21%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
10528 Points +11%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)
10225 Points +8%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
10186 Points +8%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)
9951 Points +5%
Average of class Gaming
  (6662 - 14612, n=135, last 2 years)
9891 Points +5%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
9458 Points 0%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB
9444 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (n=1)
9444 Points 0%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB
16802 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (n=1)
16802 Points 0%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)
16462 Points -2%
Alienware m18 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N
16398 Points -2%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
15985 Points -5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
15421 Points -8%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
15093 Points -10%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)
13779 Points -18%
Average of class Gaming
  (6807 - 18475, n=135, last 2 years)
12354 Points -26%
CrossMark / Overall
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB
2221 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (n=1)
2221 Points 0%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
2208 Points -1%
Alienware m18 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N
2073 Points -7%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
2048 Points -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (1247 - 2344, n=116, last 2 years)
1896 Points -15%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)
1877 Points -15%
CrossMark / Productivity
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
2055 Points +1%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB
2025 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (n=1)
2025 Points 0%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
1902 Points -6%
Alienware m18 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N
1881 Points -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (1299 - 2204, n=116, last 2 years)
1798 Points -11%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)
1738 Points -14%
CrossMark / Creativity
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB
2606 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (n=1)
2606 Points 0%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
2478 Points -5%
Alienware m18 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N
2393 Points -8%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
2316 Points -11%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)
2195 Points -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (1275 - 2660, n=116, last 2 years)
2079 Points -20%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
1944 Points +7%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB
1813 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (n=1)
1813 Points 0%
Alienware m18 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N
1806 Points 0%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
1765 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (1030 - 2330, n=116, last 2 years)
1697 Points -6%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)
1478 Points -18%
WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB
346 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (n=1)
346 Points 0%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
339 Points -2%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)
327 Points -5%
Alienware m18 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N
326 Points -6%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
322 Points -7%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
308 Points -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (215 - 480, n=129, last 2 years)
301 Points -13%
WebXPRT 4 / Overall
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB
335 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (n=1)
335 Points 0%
Alienware m18 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N
309 Points -8%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
304 Points -9%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)
287 Points -14%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
275 Points -18%
Average of class Gaming
  (176.4 - 335, n=117, last 2 years)
265 Points -21%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Average of class Gaming
  (409 - 674, n=141, last 2 years)
504 ms * -23%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
481 ms * -18%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)
452 ms * -11%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
449 ms * -10%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
449 ms * -10%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)
441 ms * -8%
Alienware m18 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N
430 ms * -5%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB
409 ms *
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (n=1)
409 ms * -0%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score
8623 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
84432 MB/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (n=1)
84432 MB/s 0%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
83392 MB/s -1%
Alienware m18 R2
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
79243 MB/s -6%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
78820 MB/s -7%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
78016 MB/s -8%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
76268 MB/s -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (21750 - 94222, n=149, last 2 years)
65754 MB/s -22%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
56992 MB/s -32%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
86788 MB/s +1%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
86194 MB/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (n=1)
86194 MB/s 0%
Alienware m18 R2
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
85791 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
85763 MB/s -1%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
85323 MB/s -1%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
82992 MB/s -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (22956 - 102937, n=149, last 2 years)
69145 MB/s -20%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
54443 MB/s -37%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
82198 MB/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (n=1)
82198 MB/s 0%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
77534 MB/s -6%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
77439 MB/s -6%
Alienware m18 R2
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
77089 MB/s -6%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
70089 MB/s -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (22297 - 108954, n=149, last 2 years)
68205 MB/s -17%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
67801 MB/s -18%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
51387 MB/s -37%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
108.9 ns *
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (n=1)
108.9 ns * -0%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
105 ns * +4%
Average of class Gaming
  (59.5 - 259, n=149, last 2 years)
95.8 ns * +12%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
87.6 ns * +20%
Alienware m18 R2
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
86.4 ns * +21%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
84.5 ns * +22%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
83 ns * +24%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
82.8 ns * +24%

* ... smaller is better

DPC 延迟

在我们的标准化延迟测试(上网、4K YouTube 播放、CPU 负载)中,使用当前 BIOS 版本的测试设备没有显示出任何限制。虽然有一个驱动程序略有故障,但重要的中断到进程延迟值很低。

LatencyMon - 概述
LatencyMon - 概述
LatencyMon - 驱动程序
LatencyMon - 驱动程序
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)
3388 μs * -318%
Alienware m18 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N
2815.1 μs * -248%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)
2384.5 μs * -194%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1955.8 μs * -141%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
1479.7 μs * -83%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
1117.4 μs * -38%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB
810 μs *

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

我们的测试配置配备了两块 2 TB 的 WD 固态硬盘,它们以 RAID 0 阵列运行(用户可用 3.6 TB)。虽然这样可以提高最大传输速率,但在基准测试中,团队在某些数值上明显落后。如果其中一块固态硬盘出现故障,RAID 0 阵列也不是理想的选择。如果华硕已经安装了一个PCIe 5.0插槽,那就更好了,因为即使只有一个固态硬盘或没有RAID,性能也会更好。即便如此,两块固态硬盘的性能在持续负载的情况下仍然保持稳定。

固态硬盘插槽 1
固态硬盘插槽 1
固态硬盘插槽 2
固态硬盘插槽 2
WD PC SN8000S 2TB
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 10557 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 6965 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 659 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 423 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 67.5 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 136.7 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 436 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 1105 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Alienware m18 R2
SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N
79.2 pt
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
78.9 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
65.9 pt
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)
65.7 pt
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)
58.4 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
54.3 pt
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
WD PC SN8000S 2TB
49.7 pt
Average WD PC SN8000S 2TB
 
49.7 pt
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
 
46.9 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)
7045 (6975.86min - 7044.54max) MB/s +85%
Alienware m18 R2
SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N
5588 (5540.05min - 5587.65max) MB/s +47%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)
5424 (5395.57min - 5423.86max) MB/s +43%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
3908 (3887.48min - 3908.2max) MB/s +3%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
WD PC SN8000S 2TB
3799 (23.02min - 3799.36max) MB/s
Average WD PC SN8000S 2TB
  (n=1)
3799 MB/s 0%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
 
3560 (3002.28min - 3559.93max) MB/s -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (1319 - 7045, n=132, last 2 years)
3442 MB/s -9%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3142 (3005.43min - 3141.53max) MB/s -17%
seq write
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)
8992 (8801.75min - 8992.01max) MB/s +103%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)
7291 (7191.64min - 7291.38max) MB/s +64%
Alienware m18 R2
SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N
5153 (5139.7min - 5152.91max) MB/s +16%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4891 (4759.07min - 4890.56max) MB/s +10%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
WD PC SN8000S 2TB
4437 (4373.88min - 4437.36max) MB/s
Average WD PC SN8000S 2TB
  (n=1)
4437 MB/s 0%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
4335 (4306.29min - 4335.44max) MB/s -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (535 - 9307, n=132, last 2 years)
3825 MB/s -14%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
 
3367 (3255.82min - 3366.95max) MB/s -24%
seq q8 t1 read
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)
13588 (10727.3min - 13588.3max) MB/s +9%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
WD PC SN8000S 2TB
12470 (11207.2min - 12469.7max) MB/s
Average WD PC SN8000S 2TB
  (n=1)
12470 MB/s 0%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)
11019 (9854.1min - 11018.8max) MB/s -12%
Alienware m18 R2
SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N
7110 (6256.85min - 7110.18max) MB/s -43%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
7084 (6413.06min - 7083.97max) MB/s -43%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
7033 (6025.44min - 7033.01max) MB/s -44%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
 
6797 (5573.18min - 6797.33max) MB/s -45%
Average of class Gaming
  (2594 - 16089, n=132, last 2 years)
6240 MB/s -50%
seq q8 t1 write
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)
11472 (11391min - 11471.6max) MB/s +32%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)
10571 (10519.3min - 10571.3max) MB/s +22%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
WD PC SN8000S 2TB
8696 (8611.54min - 8696.26max) MB/s
Average WD PC SN8000S 2TB
  (n=1)
8696 MB/s 0%
Alienware m18 R2
SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N
6779 (6710.47min - 6778.83max) MB/s -22%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
6620 (6576.94min - 6620.29max) MB/s -24%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
5255 (5183.65min - 5254.62max) MB/s -40%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
 
4902 (4309.42min - 4901.73max) MB/s -44%
Average of class Gaming
  (539 - 14571, n=132, last 2 years)
4832 MB/s -44%
4k q1 t1 read
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
99 (97.84min - 99.01max) MB/s +56%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)
81.6 (81.02min - 81.62max) MB/s +29%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
80.7 (80.11min - 80.66max) MB/s +27%
Alienware m18 R2
SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N
75.4 (73.49min - 75.43max) MB/s +19%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)
69.6 (68.6min - 69.57max) MB/s +10%
Average of class Gaming
  (32.6 - 95.9, n=132, last 2 years)
65.8 MB/s +4%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
WD PC SN8000S 2TB
63.4 (62.2min - 63.4max) MB/s
Average WD PC SN8000S 2TB
  (n=1)
63.4 MB/s 0%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
 
61.8 (61.2min - 61.81max) MB/s -3%
4k q1 t1 write
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
316 (303.92min - 316.48max) MB/s +132%
Alienware m18 R2
SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N
300 (297.27min - 299.6max) MB/s +120%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)
259 (250.68min - 258.82max) MB/s +90%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
230 (219.52min - 229.87max) MB/s +69%
Average of class Gaming
  (78 - 397, n=132, last 2 years)
224 MB/s +64%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
 
164 (110.95min - 164max) MB/s +20%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)
152.1 (149.74min - 152.09max) MB/s +12%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
WD PC SN8000S 2TB
136.4 (134.95min - 136.4max) MB/s
Average WD PC SN8000S 2TB
  (n=1)
136.4 MB/s 0%
4k q32 t16 read
Alienware m18 R2
SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N
6067 (5596.15min - 6066.73max) MB/s +713%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4926 (4895.9min - 4926.27max) MB/s +560%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
3732 (3273.44min - 3732.1max) MB/s +400%
Average of class Gaming
  (417 - 6172, n=132, last 2 years)
2619 MB/s +251%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)
1623 (1464.8min - 1623.24max) MB/s +118%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)
1385 (1275.7min - 1385.11max) MB/s +86%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
 
1005 (964.75min - 1004.59max) MB/s +35%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
WD PC SN8000S 2TB
746 (519.37min - 746.01max) MB/s
Average WD PC SN8000S 2TB
  (n=1)
746 MB/s 0%
4k q32 t16 write
Alienware m18 R2
SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N
4176 (3805.57min - 4175.9max) MB/s +1370%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3579 (3433.86min - 3579.4max) MB/s +1160%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
2900 MB/s +921%
Average of class Gaming
  (162.3 - 4869, n=132, last 2 years)
2157 MB/s +660%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)
1377 (1306.51min - 1377.05max) MB/s +385%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)
1330 (1184.45min - 1330.4max) MB/s +368%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
 
442 (336.87min - 441.83max) MB/s +56%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
WD PC SN8000S 2TB
284 (254.39min - 283.58max) MB/s
Average WD PC SN8000S 2TB
  (n=1)
284 MB/s 0%
AS SSD
Score Total
Alienware m18 R2
SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N
10655 Points +124%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
10591 Points +122%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
8367 Points +76%
Average of class Gaming
  (2271 - 13854, n=126, last 2 years)
6787 Points +42%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)
5369 Points +13%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)
5102 Points +7%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
 
4927 Points +3%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
WD PC SN8000S 2TB
4764 Points
Average WD PC SN8000S 2TB
  (n=1)
4764 Points 0%
Score Read
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3807 Points +130%
Alienware m18 R2
SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N
3753 Points +127%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
3272 Points +98%
Average of class Gaming
  (776 - 4721, n=126, last 2 years)
2455 Points +49%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)
2194 Points +33%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)
2049 Points +24%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
 
1667 Points +1%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
WD PC SN8000S 2TB
1653 Points
Average WD PC SN8000S 2TB
  (n=1)
1653 Points 0%
Score Write
Alienware m18 R2
SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N
4993 Points +120%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4852 Points +114%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
3490 Points +54%
Average of class Gaming
  (515 - 7208, n=126, last 2 years)
3139 Points +38%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
 
2518 Points +11%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
WD PC SN8000S 2TB
2267 Points
Average WD PC SN8000S 2TB
  (n=1)
2267 Points 0%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)
2092 Points -8%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)
2038 Points -10%
Seq Read
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)
9576.8 MB/s +71%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)
8496.25 MB/s +52%
Alienware m18 R2
SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N
5916.27 MB/s +6%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
5636.54 MB/s +1%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
WD PC SN8000S 2TB
5595 MB/s
Average WD PC SN8000S 2TB
  (n=1)
5595 MB/s 0%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
 
5476.6 MB/s -2%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
5346 MB/s -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (2260 - 12763, n=126, last 2 years)
4912 MB/s -12%
Seq Write
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)
8685.54 MB/s +64%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)
7597.23 MB/s +43%
Alienware m18 R2
SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N
5929.42 MB/s +12%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
WD PC SN8000S 2TB
5305 MB/s
Average WD PC SN8000S 2TB
  (n=1)
5305 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
5012 MB/s -6%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
4294.95 MB/s -19%
Average of class Gaming
  (495 - 11316, n=126, last 2 years)
3827 MB/s -28%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
 
2995.22 MB/s -44%
4K Read
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
90.9 MB/s +40%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
75.56 MB/s +16%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)
69.86 MB/s +7%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
 
65.49 MB/s +1%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
WD PC SN8000S 2TB
65.1 MB/s
Average WD PC SN8000S 2TB
  (n=1)
65.1 MB/s 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (27.8 - 112.1, n=126, last 2 years)
65.1 MB/s 0%
Alienware m18 R2
SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N
64.97 MB/s 0%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)
63.69 MB/s -2%
4K Write
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
260 MB/s +37%
Alienware m18 R2
SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N
238.28 MB/s +26%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
 
219.58 MB/s +16%
Average of class Gaming
  (79.4 - 512, n=126, last 2 years)
212 MB/s +12%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
207.25 MB/s +9%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)
200.92 MB/s +6%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
WD PC SN8000S 2TB
189.8 MB/s
Average WD PC SN8000S 2TB
  (n=1)
189.8 MB/s 0%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)
134.66 MB/s -29%
4K-64 Read
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3182 MB/s +209%
Alienware m18 R2
SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N
3096 MB/s +201%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
2636.61 MB/s +156%
Average of class Gaming
  (451 - 3475, n=126, last 2 years)
1891 MB/s +84%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)
1172.14 MB/s +14%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)
1129.76 MB/s +10%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
 
1053.83 MB/s +2%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
WD PC SN8000S 2TB
1029 MB/s
Average WD PC SN8000S 2TB
  (n=1)
1029 MB/s 0%
4K-64 Write
Alienware m18 R2
SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N
4161.9 MB/s +169%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4090 MB/s +165%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
2866.57 MB/s +85%
Average of class Gaming
  (277 - 5909, n=126, last 2 years)
2548 MB/s +65%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
 
1998.53 MB/s +29%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
WD PC SN8000S 2TB
1546 MB/s
Average WD PC SN8000S 2TB
  (n=1)
1546 MB/s 0%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)
1088.59 MB/s -30%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)
1077.68 MB/s -30%
Access Time Read
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
WD PC SN8000S 2TB
0.067 ms *
Average WD PC SN8000S 2TB
  (n=1)
0.067 ms * -0%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.016 - 0.379, n=125, last 2 years)
0.05688 ms * +15%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
0.046 ms * +31%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
0.046 ms * +31%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)
0.044 ms * +34%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)
0.036 ms * +46%
Alienware m18 R2
SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N
0.029 ms * +57%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
 
0.025 ms * +63%
Access Time Write
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)
0.091 ms * -379%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
 
0.057 ms * -200%
Alienware m18 R2
SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N
0.055 ms * -189%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.011 - 1.028, n=126, last 2 years)
0.05098 ms * -168%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
0.022 ms * -16%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)
0.019 ms * -0%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
WD PC SN8000S 2TB
0.019 ms *
Average WD PC SN8000S 2TB
  (n=1)
0.019 ms * -0%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
0.015 ms * +21%

* ... smaller is better

Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

06251250187525003125375043755000562562506875750081258750937510000106251125011875Tooltip
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø12242 (10589.57-12452.94)

图形卡

GPU-Z RTX 5000 笔记本电脑
GPU-Z RTX 5000 笔记本电脑

Strix SCAR 18 配备了全新的 GeForce RTX 5090 笔记本电脑配备 24GB VRAM,最高时钟频率达 2,340 MHz。它是速度最快的变体,TGP 为 175 瓦(150 瓦 + 25 瓦 Dynamic Boost)。我们已在我们的 GPU 分析.在合成基准测试中,新 SCAR 18 比老型号领先约 20%。在手动模式下,核心和显存时钟最高可提高 200 MHz,这使得Time Spy Graphics 的性能提高了约 25,200 分(与 Turbo 相比提高了 700 分)。GPU 的性能即使在长期负载的情况下也保持不变,但在电池模式下 GPU 的最大功耗为 55 瓦,因此在这种情况下 GPU 的性能明显降低(-64%)。

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
97.3 pt
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
 
90.8 pt
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
83.4 pt
Alienware m18 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
82 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
81 pt
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
78.7 pt
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
78.7 pt
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
67 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
51.7 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Alienware m18 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
69254 Points +4%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (66337 - 70760, n=3)
69243 Points +4%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
66337 Points
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
64952 Points -2%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
63978 Points -4%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
61833 Points -7%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
59871 Points -10%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
59715 Points -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (10741 - 72178, n=145, last 2 years)
42775 Points -36%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (48863 - 60880, n=3)
53936 Points +10%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
50532 Points +3%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
48863 Points
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
45600 Points -7%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
44702 Points -9%
Alienware m18 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
44492 Points -9%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
43477 Points -11%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
43140 Points -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (2913 - 56116, n=157, last 2 years)
30815 Points -37%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
24599 Points
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (22082 - 25129, n=3)
23937 Points -3%
Alienware m18 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
22290 Points -9%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
22256 Points -10%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
21246 Points -14%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
20070 Points -18%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
19741 Points -20%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
18814 Points -24%
Average of class Gaming
  (2295 - 24599, n=152, last 2 years)
12801 Points -48%
Geekbench 6.4
GPU OpenCL
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
234213 Points
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (199973 - 234213, n=3)
213487 Points -9%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
199476 Points -15%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
191635 Points -18%
Alienware m18 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
190316 Points -19%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
171038 Points -27%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
168252 Points -28%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
159127 Points -32%
Average of class Gaming
  (4321 - 234213, n=118, last 2 years)
118005 Points -50%
GPU Vulkan
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
231659 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
165748 Points -28%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
156636 Points -32%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (7393 - 231659, n=3)
151521 Points -35%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
133197 Points -43%
Alienware m18 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
128748 Points -44%
Average of class Gaming
  (4286 - 231659, n=110, last 2 years)
85673 Points -63%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
9584 Points -96%
3DMark 11 Performance
48486 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
38733 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
23130 points
Help
Blender / v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Average of class Gaming
  (10 - 95, n=145, last 2 years)
21.3 Seconds * -42%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
15 Seconds *
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
10 Seconds * +33%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
14 Seconds * +7%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
13 Seconds * +13%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
13 Seconds * +13%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (10 - 15, n=4)
12.3 Seconds * +18%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
12 Seconds * +20%
Alienware m18 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
12 Seconds * +20%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
10 Seconds * +33%
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
153 Seconds *
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
16 Seconds * +90%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (16 - 153, n=3)
62.7 Seconds * +59%
Average of class Gaming
  (16 - 175, n=147, last 2 years)
38.1 Seconds * +75%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
19 Seconds * +88%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
18 Seconds * +88%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
18 Seconds * +88%
Alienware m18 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
18 Seconds * +88%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
18 Seconds * +88%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
17 Seconds * +89%
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU
Average of class Gaming
  (123 - 962, n=152, last 2 years)
301 Seconds * -120%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
225 Seconds * -64%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
218 Seconds * -59%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
209 Seconds * -53%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
207 Seconds * -51%
Alienware m18 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
180 Seconds * -31%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
179 Seconds * -31%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (125 - 210, n=3)
157.3 Seconds * -15%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
137 Seconds *

* ... smaller is better

游戏性能

总体而言,它的游戏性能非常出色,但在不进行升频的情况下,其原生性能的优势并不是最大的--尤其是与旧版的 GeForce RTX 4090 笔记本电脑-更新在此意义不大。如果您仍在使用 RTX-3000 代 GPU,如 RTX 3080 Ti.不过,如果你想玩要求苛刻的全光线追踪或路径追踪游戏,如《赛博朋克》或《艾伦-唤醒》,你将无法避免通过 DLSS4 进行升频,即使在 WQHD 分辨率下也是如此。有了帧生成技术,笔记本电脑的性能可以得到更显著的提升,我们的 GPU 分析.

Performance Rating - Percent
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
97.1 pt
Alienware m18 R2
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
92.8 pt
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
91.6 pt
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
87 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) -1!
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
84.3 pt
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW -2!
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
82.9 pt
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
80.1 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
63.8 pt
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
154.9 (126.3min) fps
Alienware m18 R2
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
133.9 (67.5min) fps -14%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
129.8 (26.2min) fps -16%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
113.5 (84.3min) fps -27%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
112.1 (42.7min) fps -28%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
101.25 (77.2min) fps -35%
Average of class Gaming
  (6.76 - 158, n=89, last 2 years)
88.4 fps -43%
Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
207.7 fps +7%
Alienware m18 R2
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
202 fps +4%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
193.7 fps
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
177 fps -9%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
160.5 (65P0.1, 99.5P1) fps -17%
Average of class Gaming
  (34.5 - 208, n=56, last 2 years)
111.8 fps -42%
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
161.9 (2.78min, 111.1P1) fps
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
139.2 (3.73min, 90.9P1) fps -14%
Alienware m18 R2
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
137 (7.81min, 83.3P1) fps -15%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
136 (8.67min, 100P1) fps -16%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
134 (22.7min, 90.9P1) fps -17%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
129.8 (16.1min, 90.9P1) fps -20%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
126.7 (8.43min, 83.3P1) fps -22%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.1 - 168.2, n=134, last 2 years)
111.6 fps -31%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
199.3 fps
Alienware m18 R2
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
193.2 fps -3%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
184 fps -8%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
174.6 fps -12%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
166.1 fps -17%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
157.1 fps -21%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
156.9 fps -21%
Average of class Gaming
  (19.2 - 201, n=146, last 2 years)
116.2 fps -42%
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
401 (103.4min, 236P1) fps
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
385 (27.2min, 274P1) fps -4%
Alienware m18 R2
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
369 (31.4min, 266P1) fps -8%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
360 (22.5min, 268P1) fps -10%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
331 (34.1min, 238P1) fps -17%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
325 (49.1min, 213P1) fps -19%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
305 (14.5min, 223P1) fps -24%
Average of class Gaming
  (38.9 - 420, n=141, last 2 years)
221 fps -45%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
186.6 (157.4min) fps
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
178.4 (149.2min) fps -4%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
178.3 (150.2min) fps -4%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
174.5 (151.1min) fps -6%
Alienware m18 R2
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
171.8 (143.6min) fps -8%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
164 (140min) fps -12%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
161.3 (135.6min) fps -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (65.1 - 220, n=150, last 2 years)
148.1 fps -21%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Alienware m18 R2
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
140.6 fps +16%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
139.7 fps +15%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
136.8 fps +12%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
127.2 fps +5%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
126.1 fps +4%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
121.7 fps
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
114.5 fps -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (32.8 - 166.2, n=153, last 2 years)
103.6 fps -15%
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 2560x1440 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
106.8 (87.4min) fps
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (98.6 - 110.6, n=4)
106.4 fps 0%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
94.5 (50.3min) fps -12%
Alienware m18 R2
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
94.1 (57.3min) fps -12%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
89.7 (74.9min) fps -16%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
83.8 (35.1min) fps -22%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
83.38 (67.53min) fps -22%
Average of class Gaming
  (24.8 - 110, n=72, last 2 years)
66 fps -38%
Baldur's Gate 3 - 2560x1440 Ultra Preset
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
155.2 fps +7%
Alienware m18 R2
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
151.6 fps +4%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
145.6 fps
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (138.8 - 150.5, n=3)
145 fps 0%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
124.7 fps -14%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
119.2 (40.8P0.1, 73.2P1) fps -18%
Average of class Gaming
  (44 - 155.2, n=42, last 2 years)
90 fps -38%
Alan Wake 2 - 2560x1440 High Preset
Alienware m18 R2
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
83.1 fps +1%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (76.7 - 88.3, n=3)
82.5 fps 0%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
82.4 fps
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
79.4 (33.5P0.1, 57.9P1) fps -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (22.5 - 87.1, n=17, last 2 years)
66.3 fps -20%

Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram

0102030405060708090100110120130140Tooltip
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop: Ø144.2 (124.3-147.1)
赛博朋克 2077》CPU/GPU 数据
赛博朋克 2077》CPU/GPU 数据
lowmed.highultraQHD4K DLSS4K
GTA V (2015) 161.9 156.8 179.5
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 240 210 200 186.6 179.9
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 233 231 199.3 162.4 101.3
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 163.4 158.1 121.7 94.8
Strange Brigade (2018) 563 431 418 401 330 187.2
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) 193.7 145.6 125.4 82.8
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) 154.9 106.8 52.1
Alan Wake 2 (2023) 116.4 82.4 46
F1 24 (2024) 148 100 52
Call of Duty Black Ops 6 (2024) 147 117 79
Indiana Jones and the Great Circle (2024) 127.9 102.2 65
Monster Hunter Wilds (2025) 87.6 72 46.3
Assassin's Creed Shadows (2025) 65 51 36

排放量

噪音排放

冷却装置
冷却装置

该设备的风扇噪音主要取决于所选的能耗配置文件,我们建议在日常使用中使用静音模式,因为风扇通常是静音的。如果不希望噪音过大,使用该模式玩游戏也很有趣--我们测得最大噪音为 34.8 dB(A)。启动涡轮增压模式后,风扇的运行噪音始终低于 30 分贝(A)。在游戏和压力测试时,噪音高达 53.7 dB(A),您一定要使用耳机或附带的耳麦,但这也适用于性能模式(49 dB(A))。不过,必须指出的是,有些竞争对手的噪音甚至更大。我们在一些合成 GPU 基准测试中注意到了轻微的电子噪音,但这在日常使用和游戏时都不成问题。

Noise Level

Idle
29.8 / 29.8 / 29.8 dB(A)
Load
42.9 / 53.7 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 23.3 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.135.135.832.936.731.137.1253126.430.928.125.725.628.93131.531.229.426.826.525.629.54031.732.230.63028.528.531.35029.528.326.326.82425.2306326.624.725.725.522.821.428.18027.722.327.323.319.31826.810030.323.83325.221.418.826.212531.924.735.326.421.117.827.116027.621.53123.72016.727.220030.123.533.726.619.115.726.425033.824.634.227.220.216.825.931532.623.236.526.417.913.924.540034.523.737.828.419.611.624.85003623.639.43021.310.327.563035.924.540.231.319.410.326.28003826.541.532.620.310.227.3100040.326.143.633.9219.728.1125039.825.5443419.611.227160039.824.944.533.719.19.926.520004024.745.233.419.110.226.3250037.321.642.530.116.610.623.1315034.819.740.228.516.21121.5400033.619.338.927.813.511.321.5500033.816.53929.312.711.519.3630033.814.938.526.312.811.616.3800029.914.637.421.412.511.715.6100002514.232.120.212.51214.31250022.214.128.820.513.211.714.41600020.113.524.621.812.312.213.9SPL4934.853.742.929.823.336.6N6.629.14.11.20.52.5median 33.8median 23.5median 38.5median 27.8median 19.1median 11.6median 25.9Delta3.13.743.33.51.74hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAsus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
Alienware m18 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
Noise
5%
8%
-14%
7%
5%
-2%
off / environment *
23.3
23.4
-0%
23.6
-1%
25
-7%
22.8
2%
23.41
-0%
24
-3%
Idle Minimum *
29.8
23.9
20%
23.8
20%
30
-1%
23.8
20%
25.33
15%
27
9%
Idle Average *
29.8
28.2
5%
26.1
12%
36
-21%
23.8
20%
25.33
15%
28
6%
Idle Maximum *
29.8
29
3%
31.5
-6%
44
-48%
28
6%
25.33
15%
32
-7%
Load Average *
42.9
36.8
14%
31.5
27%
48
-12%
38
11%
33.57
22%
50
-17%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *
53.7
61.97
-15%
Load Maximum *
53.7
61.1
-14%
56.6
-5%
51
5%
62.8
-17%
62.14
-16%
52
3%
Witcher 3 ultra *
54.1
52.1
49
57.3
50

* ... smaller is better

温度

笔记本电脑的表面温度没有问题,我们在满负荷运行时仅在几个地方测得约 45 °C。即便如此,键盘(尤其是 WASD 区域)也只是略微发热,游戏时手部保持凉爽。GPU 在压力测试中受到青睐,几分钟后稳定在 175 瓦(CPU 约 57 瓦),期间温度也保持不变。

CPU/GPU 数据压力测试
CPU/GPU 数据压力测试
Max. Load
 39.8 °C45.6 °C41.1 °C 
 30.7 °C38.1 °C29.8 °C 
 26.4 °C27.3 °C26.9 °C 
Maximum: 45.6 °C
Average: 34 °C
45.1 °C46 °C44.8 °C
43.6 °C43.3 °C41.2 °C
25.5 °C25.2 °C24.8 °C
Maximum: 46 °C
Average: 37.7 °C
Power Supply (max.)  51.6 °C | Room Temperature 21.7 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.6 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.8 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 34.4 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.2 °C / 84.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-0.3 °C / -0.6 F).
表面温度应力测试(顶部)
表面温度应力测试(顶部)
表面温度应力测试(底部)
表面温度应力测试(底部)
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
Alienware m18 R2
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
Heat
-10%
-16%
-12%
-2%
-39%
-4%
Maximum Upper Side *
45.6
43.2
5%
41.2
10%
43
6%
37.8
17%
51
-12%
49
-7%
Maximum Bottom *
46
42.6
7%
34.6
25%
59
-28%
37.6
18%
64
-39%
47
-2%
Idle Upper Side *
28.9
36
-25%
42.8
-48%
32
-11%
34.8
-20%
42.3
-46%
29
-0%
Idle Bottom *
29.2
36.4
-25%
43.6
-49%
34
-16%
36
-23%
46
-58%
31
-6%

* ... smaller is better

发言人

该设备的音响系统由四个模块组成,性能尚可,但在我们的测试中,有更好的设备可与之相比。不过,由于风扇的声音太大,扬声器在游戏中的作用也不大。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.135.92525.634.33125.632.94028.533.45025.233.66321.434.6801842.610018.848.912517.85416016.753.520015.761.425016.865.531513.966.440011.667.450010.374.163010.382.780010.280.410009.778.8125011.27716009.974.1200010.269250010.66431501167.1400011.367.4500011.561.9630011.662.8800011.763.5100001263.41250011.760.21600012.249.8SPL23.386.3N0.563.3median 11.6median 65.5Delta1.75.633.935.433.926.127.326.12523.7252622.62636.128.336.14623.64655.223.555.258.222.758.261.917.961.970.218.170.27122.77175.322.475.37617.57675.517.875.576.818.476.874.918.474.974.520.974.56319.26372.118.772.176.220.176.274.916.874.97614.87670.813.870.870.512.670.57112.37169.912.169.965.611.965.663.21263.262.911.862.957.911.257.985.22985.270.21.170.2median 71median 17.8median 714.53.94.532.63632.622.123.322.121.724.121.72227.42222.828.722.824.528.224.521.124.321.121.321.421.322.418.222.438.417.438.454.81954.86518.46565.418.465.464.519.264.566.616.166.668.41468.471.817.171.871.112.371.172.612.872.674.313.274.372.513.372.570.412.270.465.412.465.463.612.363.662.712.762.763.813.163.873.914.173.972.514.372.568.812.968.867.811.967.882.526.182.554.90.854.9median 66.6median 14median 66.68.12.68.141.345.237.439.944.545.328.33125.926.827.326.71824.617.331.717.542.619.150.521.754.416.754.813.361.311.364.711.767.812.671.611.175.311.174.710.870.611.673.211.768.811.973.412.573.213711370.314.173.215.375.614.374.313.567.113.268.125.184.60.664.3median 13median 70.32.37.237.73637.728.92728.93024.93030.122.130.131.822.931.834.32934.338.723.738.743.320.743.348.517.348.557.914.557.962.914.362.968.613.668.669.611.669.672.710.772.775.99.875.980.91080.978.29.778.277.71077.775.99.975.977.610.477.676.71176.776.111.476.17611.6767511.97577.212.877.277.412.877.479.813.279.877.41377.476.113.276.17014.17089.223.889.286.70.586.7median 76.1median 11.9median 76.14.41.64.423.622.623.631.131.331.125.42025.427.919.927.938.22838.227.519.627.531.421.231.441.415.141.451.116.751.153.112.553.159.312.859.359.719.259.761.519.761.561.117.161.168.713.668.767.112.367.167.410.467.469.79.769.773.31073.367.310.467.367.810.867.867.811.267.860.111.660.168.411.768.473.411.973.467126769.41269.464.612.164.665.711.865.757.311.157.380.924.280.951.60.651.6median 67median 12median 674.41.94.44345.437.236.946.745.927.929.720.128.319.141.81548.8145513.657.416.962.715.867.414.569.911.77111.273.310.474.810.974.41174.311.575.411.272.911.571.211.868.71261.712.86213.455.113.754.613.256.713.463.813.467.512.862.612.152.424.682.10.654.2median 12.8median 67.41.37.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus Strix Scar 18 G835LXRazer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509Alienware m18 R2Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MWMSI Titan 18 HX A14VIGSCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 13% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Alienware m18 R2 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 43% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 13% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 7.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

能源管理 - 电池寿命短

耗电量

Strix SCAR 18 并不是一款特别高效的笔记本电脑,其明亮的微型 LED 面板一开始就需要大量电能,这就是为什么在我们的测试中,它的最大空闲功耗已经达到 40 瓦左右。在负载情况下,它的功耗曾一度达到 430 瓦,但随后立即降至 320 瓦。因此,所提供的 380 瓦电源装置在体积上已经足够。虽然整个照明系统已经关闭,但 1.9 瓦的待机功耗还是太高了。

380 瓦电源
380 瓦电源
380 瓦电源
380 瓦电源
Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.15 / 1.9 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 11.4 / 39.2 / 40.2 Watt
Load midlight 161.2 / 430.9 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, WD PC SN8000S 2TB, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 18"
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, , Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 18"
Alienware m18 R2
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N, IPS, 2560x1600, 18"
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0), Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 18"
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0), Mini-LED, 3840x2400, 18"
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3"
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB, Mini LED, 2560x1600, 18"
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
 
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-22%
8%
-26%
0%
24%
23%
20%
29%
Idle Minimum *
11.4
25.4
-123%
10.6
7%
31
-172%
13.2
-16%
12.16
-7%
14
-23%
Idle Average *
39.2
37.7
4%
20.9
47%
35
11%
25.4
35%
15.97
59%
17
57%
Idle Maximum *
40.2
57.9
-44%
40
-0%
43
-7%
53.5
-33%
23.71
41%
24
40%
Load Average *
161.2
128.4
20%
201.1
-25%
144
11%
151.4
6%
113.06
30%
143
11%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *
303
274
10%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor *
295
280
5%
Load Maximum *
430.9
297.9
31%
378.9
12%
318
26%
395.2
8%
301
30%
302
30%
339 ?(246 - 431, n=2)
21%
Witcher 3 ultra *
273.1
358
228
336
251

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test

0255075100125150175200225250275300325350375400425Tooltip
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø318 (291-431)
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø27.6 (24.5-34.5)
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø303 (293-314)

Power consumption with external monitor

020406080100120140160180200220240260280300Tooltip
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø227 (210-267)
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø255 (254-256)
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø72 (68.2-81.1)
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø248 (238-256)
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø248 (229-271)
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø45.5 (39.1-69.9)
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø295 (288-307)

运行时间

这台笔记本的 90 瓦时电池对其高耗电率也无能为力。在 150 cd/m² 下进行 WLAN 测试时,我们测得的耗电量约为 5.5 小时,而在全亮度(60 Hz)下则不超过 3 小时。至少这些结果比许多直接竞争对手要好,只有前代机型的持续时间更长。游戏时间仅为 44 分钟。

电池信息
电池信息
充电过程
充电过程
Battery Runtime
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra 150cd
0h 44min
WiFi Websurfing
5h 32min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness
2h 47min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
5h 47min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 10min
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 90 Wh
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 91.7 Wh
Alienware m18 R2
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 97 Wh
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99 Wh
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
-19%
-13%
-26%
-11%
1%
26%
22%
H.264
347
447
29%
WiFi v1.3
332
263
-21%
290
-13%
192
-42%
252
-24%
203
-39%
461
39%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra 150cd
44
67
52%
Load
70
58
-17%
64
-9%
72
3%
64
-9%
77
10%

Notebookcheck 总评分

Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX - 03/31/2025 v8
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis
85 / 98 → 86%
Keyboard
91%
Pointing Device
86%
Connectivity
70 / 80 → 88%
Weight
55 / 10-68 → 77%
Battery
63 / 95 → 66%
Display
92%
Games Performance
95%
Application Performance
95%
Temperature
88 / 95 → 93%
Noise
63 / 90 → 70%
Audio
85%
Camera
32 / 75 → 43%
Average
61%
88%
Gaming - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
0%
Packaging
50%
Power Use
71.6%
Repairability
40%
Software Updates
22.3%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 30.7%

Possible alternatives compared

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Height
Display
1.
88%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX ⎘
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop ⎘
64 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD
Amazon:
1. $2,899.00
ASUS ROG Strix Scar 16 (2024...
2. $6.99
Keyboard Cover for 2025 2024...
3. $199.99
380W Charger for Asus ROG St...
List Price: 5799€
3.3 kg32 mm18.00"
2560x1600
168 PPI
Mini-LED
2.
90.5% v7 (old)
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX ⎘
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU ⎘
32 GB Memory
Amazon: $4,899.99
List Price: 4500 USD
3.1 kg21.9 mm18.00"
2560x1600
168 PPI
Mini-LED
3.
89.5% v7 (old)
Alienware m18 R2
Alienware m18 R2
Intel Core i9-14900HX ⎘
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU ⎘
32 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD
Amazon:
1. $2,799.99
Alienware M18 R2 Gaming Lapt...
2. $4,799.99
Alienware Dell M18 R2 Gaming...
3. $2,399.00
NewDell Alien.Ware M18 R2 Ga...
List Price: 3300 USD
4 kg26.7 mm18.00"
2560x1600
168 PPI
IPS
4.
87.1% v7 (old)
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW
Intel Core i9-14900HX ⎘
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU ⎘
32 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD
Amazon:
1. $99.99
330W Genuine Charger for Ace...
2. $99.99
330W Genuine Charger for Ace...
3. $154.00
Accessories Compatible for A...
3.3 kg29.5 mm18.00"
2560x1600
168 PPI
Mini-LED
5.
88.8% v7 (old)
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG
Intel Core i9-14900HX ⎘
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU ⎘
128 GB Memory, 4096 GB SSD
Amazon:
1. $813.96
Factory Original 128GB (4x32...
2. $36.99
Artemis Shields Anti Glare M...
3. $159.99
400W Charger for Msi Titan 1...
List Price: 5000 USD
3.6 kg32.1 mm18.00"
3840x2400
252 PPI
Mini-LED
6.
85.1%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX ⎘
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU ⎘
32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD
List Price: 4273€3.4 kg24.9 mm17.30"
3840x2160
255 PPI
IPS

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 配备出色迷你 LED 和 RTX 5090 的 18 英寸游戏本 - 华硕 Strix SCAR 18 G835LX 评测
Andreas Osthoff, 2025-04- 3 (Update: 2025-04- 3)