配备出色迷你 LED 和 RTX 5090 的 18 英寸游戏本 - 华硕 Strix SCAR 18 G835LX 评测

Name: Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Brand: Asus

适合游戏玩家和创意人士。

华硕更新了其游戏旗舰 Strix SCAR 18，配备了 Core Ultra 9 275HX、GeForce RTX 5090 笔记本电脑和出色的 240 Hz 迷你 LED 显示屏。此外，该设备组件的访问也变得更加方便，而且还有大量的照明元素。
Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 04/03/2025 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
AI Blackwell RTX 5000 Arrow Lake Intel Laptop / Notebook Windows Wi-Fi 7 Thunderbolt

结论：更强劲的动力、更时尚的外壳和出色的微型 LED 面板

ROG Strix SCAR 18 是华硕的游戏旗舰，这一点只要看一下它的技术数据就一目了然。它采用了最快的组件，即酷睿 Ultra 9 275HX 和GeForce RTX 5090 笔记本电脑，尽管与旧款 RTX 4090 笔记本电脑相比，它在游戏时的优势相对较小，尤其是在原生 WQHD 分辨率下。只有在使用 MFG4x 等升频方法时，新款 5090 笔记本电脑才能明显脱颖而出。对于配备 RTX 3000 GPU 的游戏笔记本电脑用户来说，升级无疑更有意义。

新款 5090 笔记本电脑的机箱也做了一些改动，整体设计变得更加整洁，同时还增加了全方位 LED 灯带和机盖上的 AniME Vision 显示屏。底座仍然由塑料制成，但不幸的是，顶部的光滑表面很快就会变脏。虽然我们的测试设备已经配备了相当完善的设备，但现在无需螺丝刀就能接触到组件，笔记本电脑的维护选项也非常出色。它的 RAID 0 固态硬盘组合并不完全理想，我们更希望使用快速 PCIe 5.0 插槽，因为这意味着使用单个硬盘可以获得更好的效果。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

Test device courtesy of Asus Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

它的 240 赫兹微型 LED 显示屏几乎在所有方面都令人印象深刻，除了显示屏的纯粹规格外，华硕的附加模式也相当有趣。首先，它包括 P3 和 sRGB 的超精确出厂配置文件，你还可以停用局部调光进行图像编辑。在 HDR 模式下，还可以将苍白的 sRGB 色彩（当不显示 HDR 内容时，例如 Windows 桌面）转换为 P3 色彩空间。

这款笔记本电脑的缺点包括在性能模式和涡轮模式下散热噪音大，当然还有功耗高。此外，它的价格也非常高，尤其是我们的高端版本，价格约为 6,200 美元--至少还包括一些配件。不过，购买内存较少的廉价版，然后在必要时自己轻松扩展内存，这样做更有意义。

Strix SCAR 18 是我们测试的第一款 18 英寸新游戏笔记本电脑，但竞争对手的机型肯定会很快跟进，只有到那时我们才能确定新 SCAR 18 的性能如何。

Pros

+ 极高的游戏/系统性能

+ RTX 5090 笔记本电脑，功率为 175 瓦

+ 令人惊叹的迷你 LED 面板

+ 2x 雷电 5

+ 非常好的维护选项

+ 大量照明元素

+ 丰富的配件（取决于型号）

+ 舒适的键盘

Cons

- 游戏时风扇噪音大

- 无 PCIe 5.0

- 塑料底座易留下指纹痕迹

- 功耗高

- 背面无连接

价格和供应情况

新款华硕 ROG Strix SCAR 18 可能将于 4 月底/5 月初上市。

结论：更强劲的动力、更时尚的外壳和出色的微型 LED 面板
规格
案例 - 光照充足，阴影较少
连接性 - 配备 Thunderbolt 5 的 SCAR 18
输入设备
显示屏 - 240 赫兹的超小型 LED 面板
性能 - Arrow Lake-HX 和 RTX 5000 笔记本电脑
排放量
能源管理 - 电池寿命短
Notebookcheck 总评分
Possible alternatives compared

ROG Strix SCAR 18 G835LX 是首款采用英特尔酷睿 Ultra 9 275HX 处理器的 18 英寸游戏笔记本电脑。英特尔酷睿至尊9 275HX和英伟达GeForce RTX 5090 笔记本电脑，也是华硕 2025 年的游戏旗舰。此外，该设备还拥有 240 Hz 的 mini LED 面板、64 GB 内存和 4-TB SSD 容量，售价约为 6200 元。

规格

Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX

Processor

Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX 24 x 2.1 - 5.4 GHz, 175 W PL2 / Short Burst, 150 W PL1 / Sustained, Arrow Lake-HX

Graphics adapter

Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop - 24 GB VRAM, Core: 2340 MHz, RAM: 1750 MHz, 175 W TDP ( including 25 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR7, 572.84, Advanced Optimus

Memory

64 GB

, DDR5-5600, Dual-Channel, 2 slots

Display

18.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 168 PPI, N180QDM-NM2, Mini-LED, glossy: no, HDR, 240 Hz

Mainboard

Intel HM870 (Arrow Lake-HX PCH)

Storage

WD PC SN8000S 2TB, 2048 GB

, 2x SN8000S 2TB (RAID 0), 3686 GB free

Soundcard

Intel Arrow Lake-S PCH - ACE (Audio Context Engine)

Connections

3 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm Stereo

Networking

Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 32 x 399 x 298

Battery

90 Wh, 5600 mAh Lithium-Polymer

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 11 Home

Camera

Webcam: 1080p + IR
Primary Camera: 2 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: 4-speaker system, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 380W PSU, ROG Fusion II 300 Headset, Backpack, Armoury Crate, 3-month Xbox Game Pass, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

3.307 kg, Power Supply: 986 g

Price

5799 Euro

Links

Asus homepage
Asus notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

案例 - 光照充足，阴影较少

华硕对笔记本电脑的整个外壳进行了修改，其设计现在看起来更加时尚。机身底部的全方位 LED 灯带和机盖上的全新 AniME Vision 点阵显示屏都是全新设计。加上 RGB 键盘背光和 ROG 徽标，你可以在这里尽情发挥创意。AniME-Vision 显示屏是一个很好的噱头，除了现成的字母和动画外，您还可以使用自己的图片作为动画。

屏幕盖再次采用铝质材料，底座则使用塑料。机壳的整体稳定性非常好，但底座的光滑表面对指纹痕迹特别敏感，必须经常用湿布擦拭。铰链可将盖子牢牢固定在原位（最大开启角度 135 度），但在调整角度时无法完全避免轻微摇晃。总的来说，这款手机壳还不错，但对于一款高端产品来说，我们更希望它完全由金属制成。

在 18 英寸游戏机中，新款 Strix SCAR 18 相对小巧，重量仅为 3.3 千克，在重量方面也处于中场位置。380 瓦电源装置的重量增加了 986 克。

尺寸比较

Alienware m18 R2 MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) DIN A4 ❌

连接性 - 配备 Thunderbolt 5 的 SCAR 18

它的端口分布没有变化，但两个 USB-C 端口现在支持高达 120 GB/s 的 Thunderbolt 5。背面没有任何端口（如电源、显示屏、以太网）并不理想。由于笔记本电脑的 Arrow Lake NPU 性能较弱，因此不允许使用 Copilot+ 名称，但支持网络摄像头的 Studio Effects 或实时字幕等功能。

左：电源、千兆以太网、HDMI 2.1、USB-A 3.2 Gen 2（10 Gbit/s）、3.5 毫米音频

交流

除了 2.5 Gbit/s 以太网连接外，SCAR 18 还配备了包括蓝牙 5.4 在内的现代 Wi-Fi 7 模块。它与华硕参考路由器连接时的传输速率高且稳定。在我们的测试中，信号质量没有任何问题。

Networking
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1660 (min: 1544) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1588 (min: 1563) MBit/s ∼94%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1143 (min: 813) MBit/s ∼69%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1459 (min: 1375) MBit/s ∼87%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1199 (min: 1057) MBit/s ∼73%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1315 (min: 1269) MBit/s ∼77%
Alienware m18 R2 Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750x BE200NGW
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	791 (min: 736) MBit/s ∼48%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1381 (min: 1277) MBit/s ∼82%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	648 (min: 595) MBit/s ∼40%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1292 (min: 1215) MBit/s ∼75%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750W 320 MHz (BE200NGW)
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	831 (min: 611) MBit/s ∼50%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1589 (min: 1385) MBit/s ∼95%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750x BE200NGW
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1011 (min: 514) MBit/s ∼61%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1116 (min: 932) MBit/s ∼66%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1096 (min: 900) MBit/s ∼67%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1379 (min: 709) MBit/s ∼80%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	916 (min: 448) MBit/s ∼55%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	951 (min: 473) MBit/s ∼57%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1634 (min: 812) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1714 (min: 853) MBit/s ∼100%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	968 (min: 656) MBit/s ∼58%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1681 (min: 1662) MBit/s ∼100%

Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1660 (1544-1812)

Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1588 (1563-1610)

网络摄像头

华硕笔记本电脑仍然配备了一个不带快门的 200 万像素网络摄像头，虽然可以完成工作，但你不应对其图像质量抱有过高期望。此外，还配备了一个红外摄像头，可通过 Windows Hello 进行面部识别。

ColorChecker Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX: 8.5 ∆E min: 2.75 - max: 13.42 ∆E

配件

除了背包，我们的测试设备还配备了有线 ROG Fusion II 300 耳机、Gladius III 游戏鼠标和额外的 100 瓦 USB-C 电源。

维护

华硕使设备部件的接触变得更加容易。下底板可通过滑块解锁，然后向前拉出即可。这样就可以接触到两个 M.2 2280 固态硬盘、两个 SO-DIMM 插槽和风扇。更换旋入式电池需要进一步拆卸。

可持续性

华硕尚未对这款笔记本电脑的_二氧化碳排放量或可回收材料的使用发表评论。它的包装几乎完全由纸张和纸板组成。

输入设备

该设备带有数字键盘的大键盘输入感觉舒适，键程充足，敲击精准。机械键盘在这方面更胜一筹，而 Strix SCAR 18 的键盘则要安静得多。每个按键的背光都可以单独设置。宽大的玻璃触摸板（13.5 x 8 厘米）手感舒适顺滑，下部区域的点击声非常清晰、低沉。

显示屏 - 240 赫兹的超小型 LED 面板

Strix SCAR 18 的迷你 LED 面板分辨率为 2,560 x 1,600 像素（16:10），画质出色，即使是明亮的表面也不会出现颗粒感。得益于 240-Hz 的刷新率，动作看起来超级流畅。由于背光闪烁，我们无法通过测量方法可靠地确定微型 LED 面板的响应时间，因此我们提供的数值仅供参考。不过，华硕自己称其响应时间为 3 毫秒，我们在游戏时也没有遇到任何问题。

面板提供了一些有趣的功能和操作模式。在 SDR 模式下有三种图像模式可供选择，每种模式都能达到不同的最高亮度水平。你可以选择多重密集（激活本地调光，最大亮度 ~750 尼特）、多重平衡（激活本地调光，最大亮度 ~490 尼特）和单一图像控制（关闭本地调光，最大亮度 ~611 尼特）设置。单图像模式尤其适用于图像编辑，可确保整个屏幕表面亮度一致。在 HDR 模式下（最大亮度为 1,450 尼特，图像几乎全白），除了普通模式外，还可以选择 P3 模式，该模式会自动将非 HDR 内容（如桌面）从 sRGB 转换为 P3 色彩空间（尽管这会降低色彩准确度）。这避免了非 HDR 内容在 HDR 模式下显得非常苍白的问题。

该面板的另一个令人惊讶的特性是，在 SDR 模式下，即使激活了局部调光，其黑阶也不是 0。因此，会出现一些轻微的背光出血现象（尽管在局部调光模式下比单图像模式下的出血现象要少）。只有在 HDR 模式下，画面才是真正的全黑（黑度为 0）。

亮度约为 750 cd/m²，比去年略低，但仍然令人印象深刻。其黑度为 0.1 cd/m²，对比度超过 7000:1。在电池模式下，屏幕亮度不会降低。不过，亮度和色温都无法通过传感器自动调节。显示屏在任何亮度下都会闪烁，但频率很高，只有 20 千赫，不会造成任何问题。


746 cd/m²	767 cd/m²	757 cd/m²
723 cd/m²	764 cd/m²	749 cd/m²
715 cd/m²	759 cd/m²	747 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

N180QDM-NM2 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 767 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 747.4 cd/m² Minimum: 33 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 764 cd/m²
Contrast: 7640:1 (Black: 0.1 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.87
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
87.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.17

	Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX N180QDM-NM2, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 18", 240 Hz	Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 BOE NE180QDM-NM1, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 18", 300 Hz	Alienware m18 R2 BOE NE18NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 18", 165 Hz	Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW B180QAN01.2 (AUO45A8), Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 18", 250 Hz	MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG AU Optronics B180ZAN01.0, Mini-LED, 3840x2400, 18", 120 Hz	SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) BOE, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3", 144 Hz	Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) BOE NE180QDM-NM1, Mini LED, 2560x1600, 18", 240 Hz
Display		0%	0%	2%	-1%	-3%	1%
Display P3 Coverage	99	99 0%	97.8 -1%	99.7 1%	98.1 -1%	93.51 -6%	99.9 1%
sRGB Coverage	100	100 0%	99.5 0%	100 0%	99.8 0%	99.86 0%	100 0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	87.2	86.9 0%	88.9 2%	91.6 5%	86.2 -1%	84.33 -3%	90 3%
Response Times		-3%	14%	-51%	-263%	-8%	-46%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	7.4 ?(2.4, 5)	7.6 ?(3.6, 4) -3%	5.3 ?(2.2, 3.1) 28%	8 ?(4.9, 3.1) -8%	8.6 ?(4.2, 4.4) -16%	11.593 ?(5.307, 6.286) -57%	12 ?(8, 4) -62%
Response Time Black / White *	10.4 ?(0.6, 9.8)	14 ?(6.6, 7.4) -35%	10.4 ?(4.8, 5.6) -0%	17.6 ?(15.2, 2.4) -69%	81.8 ?(76, 5.8) -687%	6 ?(1.5, 4.5) 42%	10.7 ?(7.6, 3.1) -3%
PWM Frequency	20610 ?(100)	26444 ?(100) 28%		4832 ?(100) -77%	2592 ?(100) -87%		5733 ?(94) -72%
Screen		-99%	-94%	-30%	-88%	-157%	15%
Brightness middle	764	605.4 -21%	271.8 -64%	722 -5%	467.5 -39%	548 -28%	937 23%
Brightness	747	600 -20%	275 -63%	724 -3%	459 -39%	505 -32%	934 25%
Brightness Distribution	93	97 4%	78 -16%	93 0%	90 -3%	86 -8%	89 -4%
Black Level *	0.1	0.62 -520%	0.27 -170%	0.04 60%		0.54 -440%	0.066 34%
Contrast	7640	976 -87%	1007 -87%	18050 136%		1015 -87%	14197 86%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.2	1.53 -28%	2.48 -107%	3.4 -183%	3.77 -214%	3.81 -218%	1.52 -27%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	2.8	4.15 -48%	5.59 -100%	5.32 -90%	6.12 -119%	7.9 -182%	2.82 -1%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.5	2.6 -73%	3.7 -147%	3.8 -153%	3.2 -113%	5.4 -260%	1.7 -13%
Gamma	2.17 ^101%	2.22 ^99%	2.2 ^100%	2.383 ^92%	2.43 ^91%	2.062 ^107%	2.042 ^108%
CCT	6556 ^99%	6843 ^95%	6355 ^102%	7051 ^92%	6478 ^100%	7224 ^90%	6578 ^99%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *			0.56	1.6	2.94	2.54	1.21
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-34% / -57%	-27% / -56%	-26% / -28%	-117% / -110%	-56% / -98%	-10% / -1%

* ... smaller is better

CalMAN ColorChecker（配置文件：显示 P3，目标色彩空间：P3）

华硕一如既往地为 SDR 模式提供了各种色彩配置文件。原生模式有些过饱和，但也有非常精确的 P3 和 sRGB 配置文件。我们无法通过自己的校准进一步改善显示效果。

CalMAN ColorChecker（配置文件：sRGB，目标色彩空间：sRGB）

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
10.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.6 ms rise
10.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 9.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 25 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.7 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
7.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2.4 ms rise
7.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.5 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

20610 Hz
Amplitude: 100 %

≤ 100 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 20610 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 20610 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8500 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

性能 - Arrow Lake-HX 和 RTX 5000 笔记本电脑

测试条件

华硕提供了三种能源配置文件，分别称为 "安静"、"性能"和 "涡轮加速"，我们在以下基准测试和测量中使用了这三种配置文件。一般来说，我们希望性能和涡轮增压之间的差距更大一些。还提供了手动模式，可以提高 GPU 的时钟频率并影响风扇曲线。电池模式下无法使用Turbo模式。

能源概况	CPU TDP	CB R24 Multi	GPU TGP	Time Spy 图形	CP 2077 QHD	最大风扇噪音排放
静音	100/65 瓦	1,825 分	55 瓦	9,029 分	43.5fps	34.8 dB(A)
性能	120/105 瓦	2,039 分	160 瓦	23,300 分	102.7fps	49 dB(A)
涡轮	175/150 瓦	2,223 点	175 瓦	24,599 瓦	106.8fps	53.7 dB(A)

处理器 - Core Ultra 9 275HX

新的酷睿至尊 9 275HX作为笔记本电脑的处理器。它有 24 个内核（8 倍性能，16 倍效率），不带超线程，短时功耗可达 175 瓦，长期功耗可达 150 瓦。正如我们在 CPU，它在合成基准测试中的成绩非常好，与对比机型相比平均领先至少 11%，而与前代机型相比，我们甚至注意到领先 18%。在电池模式下，其功耗大幅降低（54/34 瓦），多核性能下降了 43%。

Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test

Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX: Ø5942 (5879.76-6059.69)

Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø4163 (3956.09-4227.88)

Alienware m18 R2 Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø4743 (4458.81-4807.11)

Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø4064 (3787.52-4673.44)

MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø4753 (4700.35-4782.4)

SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø3786 (3488.57-4363)

Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø4024 (3961.18-4098.11)

CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

CPU Performance Rating
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	88.1 pt
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	83.6 pt
Alienware m18 R2 Intel Core i9-14900HX	79.1 pt
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX	75.7 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX	74.6 pt
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 Intel Core i9-14900HX	71.9 pt
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) Intel Core i9-14900HX	70.1 pt
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Core i9-14900HX	69.3 pt
Average of class Gaming	59.9 pt

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	39001 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (36329 - 39001, n=3)	37790 Points -3%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX	32428 (29693.8^min - 32428.3^max) Points -17%
Alienware m18 R2 Intel Core i9-14900HX	31391 (28656^min - 31390.7^max) Points -20%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX	28516 Points -27%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 Intel Core i9-14900HX	27657 (23328.1^min - 27657.5^max) Points -29%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) Intel Core i9-14900HX	27338 Points -30%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Core i9-14900HX	26171 Points -33%
Average of class Gaming (5668 - 39652, n=153, last 2 years)	21537 Points -45%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	2252 Points
Alienware m18 R2 Intel Core i9-14900HX	2235 Points -1%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (2141 - 2252, n=3)	2203 Points -2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX	2177 Points -3%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Core i9-14900HX	2176 Points -3%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX	2143 Points -5%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 Intel Core i9-14900HX	2088 Points -7%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) Intel Core i9-14900HX	2028 Points -10%
Average of class Gaming (1136 - 2252, n=153, last 2 years)	1887 Points -16%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	15517 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (14307 - 15517, n=3)	14884 Points -4%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX	12103 Points -22%
Alienware m18 R2 Intel Core i9-14900HX	11816 Points -24%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 Intel Core i9-14900HX	10871 Points -30%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX	10787 Points -30%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) Intel Core i9-14900HX	10276 Points -34%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Core i9-14900HX	9881 Points -36%
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 15517, n=153, last 2 years)	8257 Points -47%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	866 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (843 - 866, n=3)	854 Points -1%
Alienware m18 R2 Intel Core i9-14900HX	853 Points -2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX	833 Points -4%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Core i9-14900HX	832 Points -4%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX	823 Points -5%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 Intel Core i9-14900HX	814 Points -6%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) Intel Core i9-14900HX	779 Points -10%
Average of class Gaming (439 - 866, n=153, last 2 years)	726 Points -16%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	6060 (5879.76^min - 6059.69^max) Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (5679 - 6060, n=3)	5899 Points -3%
Alienware m18 R2 Intel Core i9-14900HX	4807 (4458.81^min - 4807.11^max) Points -21%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX	4782 (4700.35^min - 4782.4^max) Points -21%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Core i9-14900HX	4673 (3787.52^min - 4673.44^max) Points -23%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) Intel Core i9-14900HX	4363 (3488.57^min - 4363^max) Points -28%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 Intel Core i9-14900HX	4228 (3956.09^min - 4227.88^max) Points -30%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX	4098 Points -32%
Average of class Gaming (905 - 6074, n=156, last 2 years)	3329 Points -45%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	343 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (327 - 343, n=3)	334 Points -3%
Alienware m18 R2 Intel Core i9-14900HX	318 Points -7%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Core i9-14900HX	312 Points -9%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 Intel Core i9-14900HX	304 Points -11%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX	302 Points -12%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX	300 Points -13%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) Intel Core i9-14900HX	288 Points -16%
Average of class Gaming (191.9 - 343, n=153, last 2 years)	278 Points -19%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average of class Gaming (81 - 555, n=146, last 2 years)	175 Seconds * -101%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Core i9-14900HX	125 Seconds * -44%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) Intel Core i9-14900HX	121 Seconds * -39%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX	118 Seconds * -36%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 Intel Core i9-14900HX	117 Seconds * -34%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX	104 Seconds * -20%
Alienware m18 R2 Intel Core i9-14900HX	102 Seconds * -17%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (87 - 93, n=3)	89 Seconds * -2%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	87 Seconds *

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	122818 MIPS
Alienware m18 R2 Intel Core i9-14900HX	122772 MIPS 0%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX	121266 MIPS -1%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (112410 - 122818, n=3)	118773 MIPS -3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX	114546 MIPS -7%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) Intel Core i9-14900HX	109204 MIPS -11%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 Intel Core i9-14900HX	107527 MIPS -12%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Core i9-14900HX	106977 MIPS -13%
Average of class Gaming (23795 - 144064, n=151, last 2 years)	82818 MIPS -33%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX	7172 MIPS +2%
Alienware m18 R2 Intel Core i9-14900HX	7103 MIPS +1%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	7027 MIPS
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) Intel Core i9-14900HX	6858 MIPS -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (6654 - 7027, n=3)	6783 MIPS -3%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX	6504 MIPS -7%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 Intel Core i9-14900HX	6497 MIPS -8%
Average of class Gaming (4199 - 7573, n=151, last 2 years)	6261 MIPS -11%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Core i9-14900HX	6206 MIPS -12%

Geekbench 6.4 / Multi-Core
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	21668 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (16033 - 21668, n=4)	19476 Points -10%
Alienware m18 R2 Intel Core i9-14900HX	18233 Points -16%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX	17695 Points -18%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Core i9-14900HX	17403 Points -20%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 Intel Core i9-14900HX	17231 Points -20%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX	16652 Points -23%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) Intel Core i9-14900HX	16482 Points -24%
Average of class Gaming (5340 - 21668, n=122, last 2 years)	14405 Points -34%

Geekbench 6.4 / Single-Core
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	3158 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (3044 - 3158, n=4)	3080 Points -2%
Alienware m18 R2 Intel Core i9-14900HX	3057 Points -3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX	2999 Points -5%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Core i9-14900HX	2965 Points -6%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX	2843 Points -10%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 Intel Core i9-14900HX	2842 Points -10%
Average of class Gaming (1490 - 3219, n=122, last 2 years)	2671 Points -15%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) Intel Core i9-14900HX	2611 Points -17%

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	25855 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (22218 - 25855, n=3)	24119 Points -7%
Alienware m18 R2 Intel Core i9-14900HX	21284 Points -18%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Core i9-14900HX	20029 Points -23%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX	19975 Points -23%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) Intel Core i9-14900HX	19316 Points -25%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 Intel Core i9-14900HX	19310 Points -25%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX	19137 Points -26%
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 25855, n=150, last 2 years)	14737 Points -43%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	2292 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (2214 - 2292, n=3)	2247 Points -2%
Alienware m18 R2 Intel Core i9-14900HX	2193 Points -4%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX	2118 Points -8%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX	2098 Points -8%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 Intel Core i9-14900HX	2015 Points -12%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Core i9-14900HX	2009 Points -12%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) Intel Core i9-14900HX	1924 Points -16%
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2423, n=150, last 2 years)	1902 Points -17%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	41.2 fps
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (36 - 41.2, n=3)	39.2 fps -5%
Alienware m18 R2 Intel Core i9-14900HX	32.1 fps -22%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX	30.9 fps -25%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Core i9-14900HX	29.5 fps -28%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX	29.2 fps -29%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 Intel Core i9-14900HX	27.7 fps -33%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) Intel Core i9-14900HX	27.1 fps -34%
Average of class Gaming (6.72 - 42.9, n=150, last 2 years)	23.4 fps -43%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Core i9-14900HX	85.1 s * -106%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (40.5 - 88, n=3)	56.6 s * -37%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 Intel Core i9-14900HX	48.5 s * -17%
Average of class Gaming (19 - 96.6, n=149, last 2 years)	47.7 s * -15%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) Intel Core i9-14900HX	46.6 s * -13%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX	46.2 s * -12%
Alienware m18 R2 Intel Core i9-14900HX	44.8 s * -8%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX	43.8 s * -6%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	41.3 s *

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.759, n=152, last 2 years)	0.44 sec * -12%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Core i9-14900HX	0.4225 sec * -7%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) Intel Core i9-14900HX	0.4143 sec * -5%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (0.3943 - 0.43, n=3)	0.4128 sec * -5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX	0.3944 sec * -0%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	0.3943 sec *
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 Intel Core i9-14900HX	0.3937 sec * -0%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX	0.3919 sec * +1%
Alienware m18 R2 Intel Core i9-14900HX	0.3767 sec * +4%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

287 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

343 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

6060 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

15517 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

866 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

39001 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

2252 Points

Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core

2223 Points

Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core

138 Points

Help

... in comparison

Performance Rating
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	96.8 pt
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	94.9 pt
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	82.9 pt
Alienware m18 R2 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	82.8 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	76.1 pt
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	74.5 pt
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	71.5 pt
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	69.2 pt
Average of class Gaming	63.3 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	39458 KRay/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (38066 - 39551, n=3)	39025 KRay/s -1%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	29351 KRay/s -26%
Alienware m18 R2 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	29280 KRay/s -26%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	25444 KRay/s -36%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	25098 KRay/s -36%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	23862 KRay/s -40%
Average of class Gaming (4986 - 81639, n=149, last 2 years)	22747 KRay/s -42%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	21858 KRay/s -45%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	194867 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (189130 - 194867, n=3)	191824 Points -2%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	148888 Points -24%
Alienware m18 R2 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	142791 Points -27%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	128826 Points -34%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	128369 Points -34%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	118469 Points -39%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	113270 Points -42%
Average of class Gaming (25360 - 252486, n=149, last 2 years)	108537 Points -44%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	9482 MB/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (9025 - 9482, n=3)	9329 MB/s -2%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	7229 MB/s -24%
Alienware m18 R2 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	7095 MB/s -25%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	6204 MB/s -35%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	6159 MB/s -35%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	5804 MB/s -39%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	5598 MB/s -41%
Average of class Gaming (1339 - 10389, n=149, last 2 years)	4935 MB/s -48%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	148773 Points +7%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	141681 Points +1%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	139608 Points
Alienware m18 R2 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	139323 Points 0%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	139146 Points 0%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	138708 Points -1%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (135378 - 139608, n=3)	137956 Points -1%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	136621 Points -2%
Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=149, last 2 years)	115098 Points -18%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	18256 Points +29%
Alienware m18 R2 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	16279 Points +15%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	16121 Points +14%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	15500 Points +10%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	15099 Points +7%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	14112 Points
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	13903 Points -1%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (13522 - 14112, n=3)	13863 Points -2%
Average of class Gaming (4800 - 32988, n=149, last 2 years)	13248 Points -6%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	104057 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (98724 - 104057, n=3)	101804 Points -2%
Alienware m18 R2 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	72594 Points -30%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	72355 Points -30%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	63748 Points -39%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	62867 Points -40%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	59005 Points -43%
Average of class Gaming (12321 - 134044, n=149, last 2 years)	55026 Points -47%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	54428 Points -48%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	138830 MB/s +3%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	134920 MB/s
Alienware m18 R2 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	134675 MB/s 0%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (129745 - 134920, n=3)	132891 MB/s -2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	122250 MB/s -9%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	117887 MB/s -13%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	112197 MB/s -17%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	106371 MB/s -21%
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=149, last 2 years)	105231 MB/s -22%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	2220 MB/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (2076 - 2220, n=3)	2158 MB/s -3%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	2149 MB/s -3%
Alienware m18 R2 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	2053 MB/s -8%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	1794 MB/s -19%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	1789 MB/s -19%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	1696 MB/s -24%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	1691 MB/s -24%
Average of class Gaming (373 - 2531, n=149, last 2 years)	1347 MB/s -39%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	21372 KRay/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (20602 - 21372, n=3)	21053 KRay/s -1%
Alienware m18 R2 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	16128 KRay/s -25%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	16104 KRay/s -25%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	13680 KRay/s -36%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	13608 KRay/s -36%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	12565 KRay/s -41%
Average of class Gaming (2540 - 43430, n=149, last 2 years)	12215 KRay/s -43%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	11838 KRay/s -45%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	56601 MPixel/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (48187 - 56613, n=3)	53800 MPixel/s -5%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	50465 MPixel/s -11%
Alienware m18 R2 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	49716 MPixel/s -12%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	49710 MPixel/s -12%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	47472 MPixel/s -16%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	47343 MPixel/s -16%
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=149, last 2 years)	40198 MPixel/s -29%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	33960 MPixel/s -40%

系统性能

Strix SCAR 18 是一款响应速度超快的系统，但其基准测试结果仅为平均水平。在启动游戏时，高级 Optimus 图形切换功能会导致短暂的挂起，但这是正常现象。

PCMark 10 / Score
Alienware m18 R2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N	9234 Points +7%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	8968 Points +4%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX	8805 Points +2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	8801 Points +2%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB	8623 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1)	8623 Points 0%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	8277 Points -4%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)	8230 Points -5%
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=132, last 2 years)	7837 Points -9%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	11628 Points +6%
Alienware m18 R2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N	11415 Points +4%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	11394 Points +4%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX	11378 Points +4%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)	11032 Points +1%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB	10966 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1)	10966 Points 0%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	10778 Points -2%
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12600, n=132, last 2 years)	10743 Points -2%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Alienware m18 R2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N	11415 Points +21%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	10528 Points +11%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	10225 Points +8%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX	10186 Points +8%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)	9951 Points +5%
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=132, last 2 years)	9912 Points +5%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	9458 Points 0%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB	9444 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1)	9444 Points 0%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB	16802 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1)	16802 Points 0%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	16462 Points -2%
Alienware m18 R2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N	16398 Points -2%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX	15985 Points -5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	15421 Points -8%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	15093 Points -10%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)	13779 Points -18%
Average of class Gaming (6807 - 18475, n=132, last 2 years)	12404 Points -26%

CrossMark / Overall
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB	2221 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1)	2221 Points 0%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	2208 Points -1%
Alienware m18 R2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N	2073 Points -7%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX	2048 Points -8%
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=113, last 2 years)	1896 Points -15%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	1877 Points -15%

CrossMark / Productivity
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	2055 Points +1%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB	2025 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1)	2025 Points 0%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX	1902 Points -6%
Alienware m18 R2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N	1881 Points -7%
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=113, last 2 years)	1799 Points -11%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	1738 Points -14%

CrossMark / Creativity
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB	2606 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1)	2606 Points 0%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	2478 Points -5%
Alienware m18 R2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N	2393 Points -8%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX	2316 Points -11%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	2195 Points -16%
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2660, n=113, last 2 years)	2079 Points -20%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	1944 Points +7%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB	1813 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1)	1813 Points 0%
Alienware m18 R2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N	1806 Points 0%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX	1765 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=113, last 2 years)	1698 Points -6%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	1478 Points -18%

WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB	346 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (344 - 346, n=3)	345 Points 0%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX	339 Points -2%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	327 Points -5%
Alienware m18 R2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N	326 Points -6%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	322 Points -7%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	308 Points -11%
Average of class Gaming (215 - 480, n=129, last 2 years)	303 Points -12%

WebXPRT 4 / Overall
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB	335 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1)	335 Points 0%
Alienware m18 R2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N	309 Points -8%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	304 Points -9%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	287 Points -14%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	275 Points -18%
Average of class Gaming (176.4 - 335, n=115, last 2 years)	266 Points -21%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Average of class Gaming (408 - 674, n=141, last 2 years)	502 ms * -23%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	481 ms * -18%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	452 ms * -11%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	449 ms * -10%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX	449 ms * -10%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)	441 ms * -8%
Alienware m18 R2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N	430 ms * -5%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (409 - 412, n=3)	411 ms * -0%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB	409 ms *

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score		8623 points
Help

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	84432 MB/s
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	83392 MB/s -1%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (75982 - 84432, n=3)	81478 MB/s -3%
Alienware m18 R2 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	79243 MB/s -6%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	78820 MB/s -7%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	78016 MB/s -8%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	76268 MB/s -10%
Average of class Gaming (21750 - 97515, n=149, last 2 years)	66345 MB/s -21%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	56992 MB/s -32%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	86788 MB/s +1%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	86194 MB/s
Alienware m18 R2 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	85791 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	85763 MB/s -1%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (82625 - 87760, n=3)	85526 MB/s -1%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	85323 MB/s -1%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	82992 MB/s -4%
Average of class Gaming (22956 - 102937, n=149, last 2 years)	69524 MB/s -19%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	54443 MB/s -37%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	82198 MB/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (73095 - 82198, n=3)	79151 MB/s -4%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	77534 MB/s -6%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	77439 MB/s -6%
Alienware m18 R2 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	77089 MB/s -6%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	70089 MB/s -15%
Average of class Gaming (22297 - 108954, n=149, last 2 years)	68634 MB/s -17%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	67801 MB/s -18%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	51387 MB/s -37%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (108.9 - 111.9, n=3)	110.7 ns * -2%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	108.9 ns *
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	105 ns * +4%
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=149, last 2 years)	96.6 ns * +11%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	87.6 ns * +20%
Alienware m18 R2 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	86.4 ns * +21%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	84.5 ns * +22%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	83 ns * +24%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	82.8 ns * +24%

* ... smaller is better

DPC 延迟

在我们的标准化延迟测试（上网、4K YouTube 播放、CPU 负载）中，使用当前 BIOS 版本的测试设备没有显示出任何限制。虽然有一个驱动程序略有故障，但重要的中断到进程延迟值很低。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)	3388 μs * -318%
Alienware m18 R2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N	2815.1 μs * -248%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	2384.5 μs * -194%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	1955.8 μs * -141%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX	1479.7 μs * -83%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	1117.4 μs * -38%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB	810 μs *

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

我们的测试配置配备了两块 2 TB 的 WD 固态硬盘，它们以 RAID 0 阵列运行（用户可用 3.6 TB）。虽然这样可以提高最大传输速率，但在基准测试中，团队在某些数值上明显落后。如果其中一块固态硬盘出现故障，RAID 0 阵列也不是理想的选择。如果华硕已经安装了一个PCIe 5.0插槽，那就更好了，因为即使只有一个固态硬盘或没有RAID，性能也会更好。即便如此，两块固态硬盘的性能在持续负载的情况下仍然保持稳定。

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

WD PC SN8000S 2TB

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 10557 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 6965 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 659 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 423 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 67.5 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 136.7 MB/s

CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 436 MB/s

CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 1105 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Alienware m18 R2 SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N	79.2 pt
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	78.9 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	65.9 pt
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)	65.7 pt
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	58.4 pt
Average of class Gaming	54.1 pt
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX WD PC SN8000S 2TB	49.7 pt
Average WD PC SN8000S 2TB	49.7 pt
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509	46.9 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)	7045 (6975.86^min - 7044.54^max) MB/s +85%
Alienware m18 R2 SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N	5588 (5540.05^min - 5587.65^max) MB/s +47%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	5424 (5395.57^min - 5423.86^max) MB/s +43%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	3908 (3887.48^min - 3908.2^max) MB/s +3%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX WD PC SN8000S 2TB	3799 (23.02^min - 3799.36^max) MB/s
Average WD PC SN8000S 2TB (n=1)	3799 MB/s 0%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509	3560 (3002.28^min - 3559.93^max) MB/s -6%
Average of class Gaming (1319 - 7045, n=131, last 2 years)	3428 MB/s -10%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	3142 (3005.43^min - 3141.53^max) MB/s -17%
seq write
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)	8992 (8801.75^min - 8992.01^max) MB/s +103%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	7291 (7191.64^min - 7291.38^max) MB/s +64%
Alienware m18 R2 SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N	5153 (5139.7^min - 5152.91^max) MB/s +16%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	4891 (4759.07^min - 4890.56^max) MB/s +10%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX WD PC SN8000S 2TB	4437 (4373.88^min - 4437.36^max) MB/s
Average WD PC SN8000S 2TB (n=1)	4437 MB/s 0%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	4335 (4306.29^min - 4335.44^max) MB/s -2%
Average of class Gaming (535 - 9307, n=131, last 2 years)	3813 MB/s -14%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509	3367 (3255.82^min - 3366.95^max) MB/s -24%
seq q8 t1 read
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	13588 (10727.3^min - 13588.3^max) MB/s +9%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX WD PC SN8000S 2TB	12470 (11207.2^min - 12469.7^max) MB/s
Average WD PC SN8000S 2TB (n=1)	12470 MB/s 0%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)	11019 (9854.1^min - 11018.8^max) MB/s -12%
Alienware m18 R2 SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N	7110 (6256.85^min - 7110.18^max) MB/s -43%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	7084 (6413.06^min - 7083.97^max) MB/s -43%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	7033 (6025.44^min - 7033.01^max) MB/s -44%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509	6797 (5573.18^min - 6797.33^max) MB/s -45%
Average of class Gaming (2594 - 16089, n=131, last 2 years)	6214 MB/s -50%
seq q8 t1 write
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)	11472 (11391^min - 11471.6^max) MB/s +32%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	10571 (10519.3^min - 10571.3^max) MB/s +22%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX WD PC SN8000S 2TB	8696 (8611.54^min - 8696.26^max) MB/s
Average WD PC SN8000S 2TB (n=1)	8696 MB/s 0%
Alienware m18 R2 SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N	6779 (6710.47^min - 6778.83^max) MB/s -22%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	6620 (6576.94^min - 6620.29^max) MB/s -24%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	5255 (5183.65^min - 5254.62^max) MB/s -40%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509	4902 (4309.42^min - 4901.73^max) MB/s -44%
Average of class Gaming (539 - 14571, n=131, last 2 years)	4838 MB/s -44%
4k q1 t1 read
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	99 (97.84^min - 99.01^max) MB/s +56%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)	81.6 (81.02^min - 81.62^max) MB/s +29%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	80.7 (80.11^min - 80.66^max) MB/s +27%
Alienware m18 R2 SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N	75.4 (73.49^min - 75.43^max) MB/s +19%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	69.6 (68.6^min - 69.57^max) MB/s +10%
Average of class Gaming (32.6 - 95.9, n=131, last 2 years)	65.9 MB/s +4%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX WD PC SN8000S 2TB	63.4 (62.2^min - 63.4^max) MB/s
Average WD PC SN8000S 2TB (n=1)	63.4 MB/s 0%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509	61.8 (61.2^min - 61.81^max) MB/s -3%
4k q1 t1 write
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	316 (303.92^min - 316.48^max) MB/s +132%
Alienware m18 R2 SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N	300 (297.27^min - 299.6^max) MB/s +120%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)	259 (250.68^min - 258.82^max) MB/s +90%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	230 (219.52^min - 229.87^max) MB/s +69%
Average of class Gaming (78 - 397, n=131, last 2 years)	223 MB/s +63%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509	164 (110.95^min - 164^max) MB/s +20%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	152.1 (149.74^min - 152.09^max) MB/s +12%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX WD PC SN8000S 2TB	136.4 (134.95^min - 136.4^max) MB/s
Average WD PC SN8000S 2TB (n=1)	136.4 MB/s 0%
4k q32 t16 read
Alienware m18 R2 SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N	6067 (5596.15^min - 6066.73^max) MB/s +713%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	4926 (4895.9^min - 4926.27^max) MB/s +560%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	3732 (3273.44^min - 3732.1^max) MB/s +400%
Average of class Gaming (417 - 6172, n=131, last 2 years)	2627 MB/s +252%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	1623 (1464.8^min - 1623.24^max) MB/s +118%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)	1385 (1275.7^min - 1385.11^max) MB/s +86%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509	1005 (964.75^min - 1004.59^max) MB/s +35%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX WD PC SN8000S 2TB	746 (519.37^min - 746.01^max) MB/s
Average WD PC SN8000S 2TB (n=1)	746 MB/s 0%
4k q32 t16 write
Alienware m18 R2 SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N	4176 (3805.57^min - 4175.9^max) MB/s +1370%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	3579 (3433.86^min - 3579.4^max) MB/s +1160%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	2900 MB/s +921%
Average of class Gaming (162.3 - 4869, n=131, last 2 years)	2160 MB/s +661%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	1377 (1306.51^min - 1377.05^max) MB/s +385%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)	1330 (1184.45^min - 1330.4^max) MB/s +368%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509	442 (336.87^min - 441.83^max) MB/s +56%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX WD PC SN8000S 2TB	284 (254.39^min - 283.58^max) MB/s
Average WD PC SN8000S 2TB (n=1)	284 MB/s 0%

AS SSD
Score Total
Alienware m18 R2 SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N	10655 Points +124%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	10591 Points +122%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	8367 Points +76%
Average of class Gaming (2271 - 13854, n=123, last 2 years)	6746 Points +42%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	5369 Points +13%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)	5102 Points +7%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509	4927 Points +3%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX WD PC SN8000S 2TB	4764 Points
Average WD PC SN8000S 2TB (n=1)	4764 Points 0%
Score Read
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	3807 Points +130%
Alienware m18 R2 SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N	3753 Points +127%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	3272 Points +98%
Average of class Gaming (776 - 4721, n=123, last 2 years)	2441 Points +48%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	2194 Points +33%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)	2049 Points +24%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509	1667 Points +1%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX WD PC SN8000S 2TB	1653 Points
Average WD PC SN8000S 2TB (n=1)	1653 Points 0%
Score Write
Alienware m18 R2 SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N	4993 Points +120%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	4852 Points +114%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	3490 Points +54%
Average of class Gaming (515 - 7208, n=123, last 2 years)	3119 Points +38%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509	2518 Points +11%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX WD PC SN8000S 2TB	2267 Points
Average WD PC SN8000S 2TB (n=1)	2267 Points 0%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	2092 Points -8%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)	2038 Points -10%
Seq Read
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	9576.8 MB/s +71%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)	8496.25 MB/s +52%
Alienware m18 R2 SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N	5916.27 MB/s +6%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	5636.54 MB/s +1%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX WD PC SN8000S 2TB	5595 MB/s
Average WD PC SN8000S 2TB (n=1)	5595 MB/s 0%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509	5476.6 MB/s -2%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	5346 MB/s -4%
Average of class Gaming (2260 - 12763, n=123, last 2 years)	4904 MB/s -12%
Seq Write
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	8685.54 MB/s +64%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)	7597.23 MB/s +43%
Alienware m18 R2 SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N	5929.42 MB/s +12%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX WD PC SN8000S 2TB	5305 MB/s
Average WD PC SN8000S 2TB (n=1)	5305 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	5012 MB/s -6%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	4294.95 MB/s -19%
Average of class Gaming (495 - 11316, n=123, last 2 years)	3819 MB/s -28%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509	2995.22 MB/s -44%
4K Read
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	90.9 MB/s +40%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	75.56 MB/s +16%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)	69.86 MB/s +7%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509	65.49 MB/s +1%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX WD PC SN8000S 2TB	65.1 MB/s
Average WD PC SN8000S 2TB (n=1)	65.1 MB/s 0%
Average of class Gaming (27.8 - 112.1, n=123, last 2 years)	65 MB/s 0%
Alienware m18 R2 SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N	64.97 MB/s 0%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	63.69 MB/s -2%
4K Write
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	260 MB/s +37%
Alienware m18 R2 SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N	238.28 MB/s +26%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509	219.58 MB/s +16%
Average of class Gaming (79.4 - 512, n=123, last 2 years)	213 MB/s +12%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	207.25 MB/s +9%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)	200.92 MB/s +6%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX WD PC SN8000S 2TB	189.8 MB/s
Average WD PC SN8000S 2TB (n=1)	189.8 MB/s 0%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	134.66 MB/s -29%
4K-64 Read
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	3182 MB/s +209%
Alienware m18 R2 SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N	3096 MB/s +201%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	2636.61 MB/s +156%
Average of class Gaming (451 - 3475, n=123, last 2 years)	1878 MB/s +83%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	1172.14 MB/s +14%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)	1129.76 MB/s +10%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509	1053.83 MB/s +2%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX WD PC SN8000S 2TB	1029 MB/s
Average WD PC SN8000S 2TB (n=1)	1029 MB/s 0%
4K-64 Write
Alienware m18 R2 SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N	4161.9 MB/s +169%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	4090 MB/s +165%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	2866.57 MB/s +85%
Average of class Gaming (277 - 5909, n=123, last 2 years)	2528 MB/s +64%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509	1998.53 MB/s +29%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX WD PC SN8000S 2TB	1546 MB/s
Average WD PC SN8000S 2TB (n=1)	1546 MB/s 0%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	1088.59 MB/s -30%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)	1077.68 MB/s -30%
Access Time Read
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX WD PC SN8000S 2TB	0.067 ms *
Average WD PC SN8000S 2TB (n=1)	0.067 ms * -0%
Average of class Gaming (0.016 - 0.379, n=122, last 2 years)	0.05688 ms * +15%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	0.046 ms * +31%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	0.046 ms * +31%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)	0.044 ms * +34%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	0.036 ms * +46%
Alienware m18 R2 SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N	0.029 ms * +57%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509	0.025 ms * +63%
Access Time Write
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	0.091 ms * -379%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509	0.057 ms * -200%
Alienware m18 R2 SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N	0.055 ms * -189%
Average of class Gaming (0.011 - 1.028, n=123, last 2 years)	0.05135 ms * -170%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	0.022 ms * -16%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)	0.019 ms * -0%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX WD PC SN8000S 2TB	0.019 ms *
Average WD PC SN8000S 2TB (n=1)	0.019 ms * -0%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	0.015 ms * +21%

* ... smaller is better

Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø12242 (10589.57-12452.94)

图形卡

Strix SCAR 18 配备了全新的 GeForce RTX 5090 笔记本电脑配备 24GB VRAM，最高时钟频率达 2,340 MHz。它是速度最快的变体，TGP 为 175 瓦（150 瓦 + 25 瓦 Dynamic Boost）。我们已在我们的 GPU 分析.在合成基准测试中，新 SCAR 18 比老型号领先约 20%。在手动模式下，核心和显存时钟最高可提高 200 MHz，这使得Time Spy Graphics 的性能提高了约 25,200 分（与 Turbo 相比提高了 700 分）。GPU 的性能即使在长期负载的情况下也保持不变，但在电池模式下 GPU 的最大功耗为 55 瓦，因此在这种情况下 GPU 的性能明显降低（-64%）。

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark | Geekbench 6.4

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	98.4 pt
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	90.5 pt
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	84.6 pt
Alienware m18 R2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	83 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	82 pt
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW ^-1! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	79.9 pt
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	79.8 pt
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	68.1 pt
Average of class Gaming	53 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Alienware m18 R2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	69254 Points +4%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	66337 Points
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (54052 - 70760, n=4)	65445 Points -1%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	64952 Points -2%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	63978 Points -4%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	61833 Points -7%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	59871 Points -10%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	59715 Points -10%
Average of class Gaming (10741 - 72178, n=142, last 2 years)	42881 Points -35%

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (42516 - 60880, n=6)	50747 Points +4%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	50532 Points +3%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	48863 Points
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	45600 Points -7%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	44702 Points -9%
Alienware m18 R2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	44492 Points -9%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	43477 Points -11%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	43140 Points -12%
Average of class Gaming (2913 - 56116, n=155, last 2 years)	30979 Points -37%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	24599 Points
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (19216 - 25129, n=6)	22965 Points -7%
Alienware m18 R2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	22290 Points -9%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	22256 Points -10%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	21246 Points -14%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	20070 Points -18%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	19741 Points -20%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	18814 Points -24%
Average of class Gaming (2295 - 24599, n=151, last 2 years)	12903 Points -48%

Geekbench 6.4
GPU OpenCL
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	234213 Points
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (181670 - 234266, n=6)	212927 Points -9%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	199476 Points -15%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	191635 Points -18%
Alienware m18 R2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	190316 Points -19%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	171038 Points -27%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	168252 Points -28%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	159127 Points -32%
Average of class Gaming (4321 - 234266, n=121, last 2 years)	121375 Points -48%
GPU Vulkan
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	231659 Points
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (7393 - 231659, n=6)	170746 Points -26%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	165748 Points -28%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	156636 Points -32%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	133197 Points -43%
Alienware m18 R2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	128748 Points -44%
Average of class Gaming (4286 - 231659, n=113, last 2 years)	87927 Points -62%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	9584 Points -96%

3DMark 11 Performance		48486 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		38733 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		23130 points
Help

... in comparison

Blender: v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | v3.3 Classroom CUDA | v3.3 Classroom CPU

Blender / v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Average of class Gaming (10 - 95, n=144, last 2 years)	21.1 Seconds * -41%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	15 Seconds *
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	10 Seconds * +33%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	14 Seconds * +7%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	13 Seconds * +13%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	13 Seconds * +13%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	12 Seconds * +20%
Alienware m18 R2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	12 Seconds * +20%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (9.9 - 15, n=7)	11.7 Seconds * +22%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	10 Seconds * +33%

Blender / v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (16 - 156, n=6)	40.2 Seconds * -151%
Average of class Gaming (16 - 156, n=146, last 2 years)	36.8 Seconds * -130%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	19 Seconds * -19%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	18 Seconds * -13%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	18 Seconds * -13%
Alienware m18 R2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	18 Seconds * -13%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	18 Seconds * -13%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	17 Seconds * -6%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	16 Seconds *

Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU
Average of class Gaming (123 - 962, n=152, last 2 years)	299 Seconds * -118%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	225 Seconds * -64%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	218 Seconds * -59%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	209 Seconds * -53%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	207 Seconds * -51%
Alienware m18 R2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	180 Seconds * -31%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	179 Seconds * -31%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (125 - 259, n=7)	164.3 Seconds * -20%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	137 Seconds *

* ... smaller is better

游戏性能

总体而言，它的游戏性能非常出色，但在不进行升频的情况下，其原生性能的优势并不是最大的--尤其是与旧版的 GeForce RTX 4090 笔记本电脑-更新在此意义不大。如果您仍在使用 RTX-3000 代 GPU，如 RTX 3080 Ti.不过，如果你想玩要求苛刻的全光线追踪或路径追踪游戏，如《赛博朋克》或《艾伦-唤醒》，你将无法避免通过 DLSS4 进行升频，即使在 WQHD 分辨率下也是如此。有了帧生成技术，笔记本电脑的性能可以得到更显著的提升，我们的 GPU 分析.

Performance Rating - Percent
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	97.1 pt
Alienware m18 R2 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	92.8 pt
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	91.6 pt
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	87 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) ^-1! Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	84.3 pt
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW ^-2! Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	82.9 pt
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	80.1 pt
Average of class Gaming	64.1 pt

Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	154.9 (126.3^min) fps
Alienware m18 R2 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	133.9 (67.5^min) fps -14%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	129.8 (26.2^min) fps -16%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	113.5 (84.3^min) fps -27%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	112.1 (42.7^min) fps -28%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	101.25 (77.2^min) fps -35%
Average of class Gaming (6.76 - 158, n=91, last 2 years)	89.4 fps -42%

Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	207.7 fps +7%
Alienware m18 R2 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	202 fps +4%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	193.7 fps
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	177 fps -9%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	160.5 (65^P0.1, 99.5^P1) fps -17%
Average of class Gaming (34.5 - 208, n=58, last 2 years)	113.5 fps -41%

GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	161.9 (2.78^min, 111.1^P1) fps
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	139.2 (3.73^min, 90.9^P1) fps -14%
Alienware m18 R2 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	137 (7.81^min, 83.3^P1) fps -15%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	136 (8.67^min, 100^P1) fps -16%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	134 (22.7^min, 90.9^P1) fps -17%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	129.8 (16.1^min, 90.9^P1) fps -20%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	126.7 (8.43^min, 83.3^P1) fps -22%
Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 168.2, n=131, last 2 years)	112.2 fps -31%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	199.3 fps
Alienware m18 R2 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	193.2 fps -3%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	184 fps -8%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	174.6 fps -12%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	166.1 fps -17%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	157.1 fps -21%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	156.9 fps -21%
Average of class Gaming (19.2 - 201, n=143, last 2 years)	116.6 fps -41%

Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	401 (103.4^min, 236^P1) fps
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	385 (27.2^min, 274^P1) fps -4%
Alienware m18 R2 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	369 (31.4^min, 266^P1) fps -8%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	360 (22.5^min, 268^P1) fps -10%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	331 (34.1^min, 238^P1) fps -17%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	325 (49.1^min, 213^P1) fps -19%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	305 (14.5^min, 223^P1) fps -24%
Average of class Gaming (38.9 - 420, n=139, last 2 years)	223 fps -44%

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	186.6 (157.4^min) fps
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	178.4 (149.2^min) fps -4%
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	178.3 (150.2^min) fps -4%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	174.5 (151.1^min) fps -6%
Alienware m18 R2 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	171.8 (143.6^min) fps -8%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	164 (140^min) fps -12%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	161.3 (135.6^min) fps -14%
Average of class Gaming (65.1 - 220, n=148, last 2 years)	148.1 fps -21%

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Alienware m18 R2 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	140.6 fps +16%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	139.7 fps +15%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	136.8 fps +12%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	127.2 fps +5%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	126.1 fps +4%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	121.7 fps
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	114.5 fps -6%
Average of class Gaming (32.8 - 166.2, n=152, last 2 years)	103.5 fps -15%

Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty | Baldur's Gate 3 | Alan Wake 2

Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 2560x1440 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	106.8 (87.4^min) fps
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (83.2 - 110.6, n=6)	102.9 fps -4%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	94.5 (50.3^min) fps -12%
Alienware m18 R2 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	94.1 (57.3^min) fps -12%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	89.7 (74.9^min) fps -16%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	83.8 (35.1^min) fps -22%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	83.38 (67.53^min) fps -22%
Average of class Gaming (24.8 - 106.8, n=71, last 2 years)	65.4 fps -39%

Baldur's Gate 3 - 2560x1440 Ultra Preset
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	155.2 fps +7%
Alienware m18 R2 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	151.6 fps +4%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	145.6 fps
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (103.1 - 158.4, n=5)	139.3 fps -4%
SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	124.7 fps -14%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	119.2 (40.8^P0.1, 73.2^P1) fps -18%
Average of class Gaming (44 - 155.2, n=44, last 2 years)	91.3 fps -37%

Alan Wake 2 - 2560x1440 High Preset
Alienware m18 R2 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	83.1 fps +1%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	82.4 fps
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	79.4 (33.5^P0.1, 57.9^P1) fps -4%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (57.6 - 88.3, n=5)	77.9 fps -5%
Average of class Gaming (22.5 - 87.1, n=19, last 2 years)	66.4 fps -19%

Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram

Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop: Ø144.2 (124.3-147.1)

	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD	4K DLSS	4K
GTA V (2015)				161.9	156.8		179.5
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	240	210	200	186.6			179.9
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	233	231	199.3		162.4		101.3
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	163.4	158.1	121.7				94.8
Strange Brigade (2018)	563	431	418	401	330		187.2
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023)				193.7	145.6	125.4	82.8
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023)				154.9	106.8		52.1
Alan Wake 2 (2023)			116.4		82.4		46
F1 24 (2024)				148	100		52
Call of Duty Black Ops 6 (2024)				147	117		79
Indiana Jones and the Great Circle (2024)				127.9	102.2		65
Monster Hunter Wilds (2025)				87.6	72		46.3
Assassin's Creed Shadows (2025)				65	51		36

排放量

噪音排放

该设备的风扇噪音主要取决于所选的能耗配置文件，我们建议在日常使用中使用静音模式，因为风扇通常是静音的。如果不希望噪音过大，使用该模式玩游戏也很有趣--我们测得最大噪音为 34.8 dB(A)。启动涡轮增压模式后，风扇的运行噪音始终低于 30 分贝（A）。在游戏和压力测试时，噪音高达 53.7 dB(A)，您一定要使用耳机或附带的耳麦，但这也适用于性能模式（49 dB(A)）。不过，必须指出的是，有些竞争对手的噪音甚至更大。我们在一些合成 GPU 基准测试中注意到了轻微的电子噪音，但这在日常使用和游戏时都不成问题。

Noise Level

Idle		29.8 / 29.8 / 29.8 dB(A)
Load		42.9 / 53.7 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.3 dB(A)

	Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB	Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX	Alienware m18 R2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N	Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)	MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
Noise		5%	8%	-14%	7%	5%	-2%
off / environment *	23.3	23.4 -0%	23.6 -1%	25 -7%	22.8 2%	23.41 -0%	24 -3%
Idle Minimum *	29.8	23.9 20%	23.8 20%	30 -1%	23.8 20%	25.33 15%	27 9%
Idle Average *	29.8	28.2 5%	26.1 12%	36 -21%	23.8 20%	25.33 15%	28 6%
Idle Maximum *	29.8	29 3%	31.5 -6%	44 -48%	28 6%	25.33 15%	32 -7%
Load Average *	42.9	36.8 14%	31.5 27%	48 -12%	38 11%	33.57 22%	50 -17%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *	53.7					61.97 -15%
Load Maximum *	53.7	61.1 -14%	56.6 -5%	51 5%	62.8 -17%	62.14 -16%	52 3%
Witcher 3 ultra *		54.1	52.1	49	57.3		50

* ... smaller is better

温度

笔记本电脑的表面温度没有问题，我们在满负荷运行时仅在几个地方测得约 45 °C。即便如此，键盘（尤其是 WASD 区域）也只是略微发热，游戏时手部保持凉爽。GPU 在压力测试中受到青睐，几分钟后稳定在 175 瓦（CPU 约 57 瓦），期间温度也保持不变。

Max. Load

Idle

Cyberpunk


39.8 °C	45.6 °C	41.1 °C
30.7 °C	38.1 °C	29.8 °C
26.4 °C	27.3 °C	26.9 °C

Maximum: 45.6 °C
Average: 34 °C


45.1 °C	46 °C	44.8 °C
43.6 °C	43.3 °C	41.2 °C
25.5 °C	25.2 °C	24.8 °C

Maximum: 46 °C
Average: 37.7 °C

Power Supply (max.) 51.6 °C | Room Temperature 21.7 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Cyberpunk


28.4 °C	28.9 °C	27.7 °C
28 °C	27.9 °C	27.1 °C
24.4 °C	24.9 °C	24.3 °C

Maximum: 28.9 °C
Average: 26.8 °C


27.4 °C	28.7 °C	28.8 °C
27.5 °C	28.7 °C	29.2 °C
24.3 °C	24.8 °C	25.2 °C

Maximum: 29.2 °C
Average: 27.2 °C

Power Supply (max.) 25.6 °C | Room Temperature 21.6 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Cyberpunk


39.4 °C	44.4 °C	40.3 °C
31.7 °C	37.5 °C	31.2 °C
28.4 °C	29.2 °C	27.8 °C

Maximum: 44.4 °C
Average: 34.4 °C


44.5 °C	45.2 °C	44.4 °C
41.6 °C	44.5 °C	41.6 °C
25.5 °C	25.3 °C	25.2 °C

Maximum: 45.2 °C
Average: 37.5 °C

Power Supply (max.) 48.7 °C | Room Temperature 21.7 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.6 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.8 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 34.4 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.2 °C / 84.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-0.3 °C / -0.6 F).

	Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	Alienware m18 R2 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
Heat		-10%	-16%	-12%	-2%	-39%	-4%
Maximum Upper Side *	45.6	43.2 5%	41.2 10%	43 6%	37.8 17%	51 -12%	49 -7%
Maximum Bottom *	46	42.6 7%	34.6 25%	59 -28%	37.6 18%	64 -39%	47 -2%
Idle Upper Side *	28.9	36 -25%	42.8 -48%	32 -11%	34.8 -20%	42.3 -46%	29 -0%
Idle Bottom *	29.2	36.4 -25%	43.6 -49%	34 -16%	36 -23%	46 -58%	31 -6%

* ... smaller is better

发言人

该设备的音响系统由四个模块组成，性能尚可，但在我们的测试中，有更好的设备可与之相比。不过，由于风扇的声音太大，扬声器在游戏中的作用也不大。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 13% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Alienware m18 R2 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 43% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 13% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 7.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

能源管理 - 电池寿命短

耗电量

Strix SCAR 18 并不是一款特别高效的笔记本电脑，其明亮的微型 LED 面板一开始就需要大量电能，这就是为什么在我们的测试中，它的最大空闲功耗已经达到 40 瓦左右。在负载情况下，它的功耗曾一度达到 430 瓦，但随后立即降至 320 瓦。因此，所提供的 380 瓦电源装置在体积上已经足够。虽然整个照明系统已经关闭，但 1.9 瓦的待机功耗还是太高了。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.15 / 1.9 Watt
Idle	11.4 / 39.2 / 40.2 Watt
Load	161.2 / 430.9 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, WD PC SN8000S 2TB, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 18"	Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, , Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 18"	Alienware m18 R2 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N, IPS, 2560x1600, 18"	Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0), Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 18"	MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0), Mini-LED, 3840x2400, 18"	SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3"	Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB, Mini LED, 2560x1600, 18"	Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	Average of class Gaming
Power Consumption		-22%	8%	-26%	0%	24%	23%	28%	29%
Idle Minimum *	11.4	25.4 -123%	10.6 7%	31 -172%	13.2 -16%	12.16 -7%	14 -23%	10.6 ?(9.4 - 11.4, n=3) 7%	13.6 ?(2 - 39, n=125, last 2 years) -19%
Idle Average *	39.2	37.7 4%	20.9 47%	35 11%	25.4 35%	15.97 59%	17 57%	22.1 ?(13.5 - 39.2, n=3) 44%	19 ?(8 - 55.6, n=125, last 2 years) 52%
Idle Maximum *	40.2	57.9 -44%	40 -0%	43 -7%	53.5 -33%	23.71 41%	24 40%	23.2 ?(13.7 - 40.2, n=3) 42%	26.4 ?(9 - 101.1, n=125, last 2 years) 34%
Load Average *	161.2	128.4 20%	201.1 -25%	144 11%	151.4 6%	113.06 30%	143 11%	132.3 ?(115.4 - 161.2, n=3) 18%	103.2 ?(32.1 - 201, n=123, last 2 years) 36%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *	303					274 10%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor *	295					280 5%
Load Maximum *	430.9	297.9 31%	378.9 12%	318 26%	395.2 8%	301 30%	302 30%	298 ?(217 - 431, n=3) 31%	247 ?(64.5 - 431, n=125, last 2 years) 43%
Witcher 3 ultra *		273.1	358	228	336		251

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test

Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø318 (291-431)

Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø27.6 (24.5-34.5)

Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø303 (293-314)

Power consumption with external monitor

Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø227 (210-267)

Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø255 (254-256)

Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø72 (68.2-81.1)

Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø248 (238-256)

Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø248 (229-271)

Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø45.5 (39.1-69.9)

Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø295 (288-307)

运行时间

这台笔记本的 90 瓦时电池对其高耗电率也无能为力。在 150 cd/m² 下进行 WLAN 测试时，我们测得的耗电量约为 5.5 小时，而在全亮度（60 Hz）下则不超过 3 小时。至少这些结果比许多直接竞争对手要好，只有前代机型的持续时间更长。游戏时间仅为 44 分钟。

Battery Runtime

Cyberpunk 2077 ultra 150cd		0h 44min
WiFi Websurfing		5h 32min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness		2h 47min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		5h 47min
Load (maximum brightness)		1h 10min

	Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 90 Wh	Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 91.7 Wh	Alienware m18 R2 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 97 Wh	Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh	MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh	SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99 Wh	Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Battery Runtime		-19%	-13%	-26%	-11%	1%	26%	23%
H.264	347						447 29%	452 ?(129 - 884, n=59, last 2 years) 30%
WiFi v1.3	332	263 -21%	290 -13%	192 -42%	252 -24%	203 -39%	461 39%	388 ?(85 - 889, n=123, last 2 years) 17%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra 150cd	44					67 52%
Load	70	58 -17%		64 -9%	72 3%	64 -9%	77 10%	84.7 ?(41 - 164, n=85, last 2 years) 21%

Notebookcheck 总评分

Back to the verdict

Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX - 03/31/2025 v8
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis

85 / 98 → 86%

Keyboard

91%

Pointing Device

86%

Connectivity

70 / 80 → 88%

Weight

55 / 10-68 → 77%

Battery

63 / 95 → 66%

Display

92%

Games Performance

95%

Application Performance

95%

Temperature

88 / 95 → 93%

Noise

63 / 90 → 70%

Audio

85%

Camera

32 / 75 → 43%

Average

61%

88%

Gaming - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
0%

Packaging
50%

Power Use
71.6%

Repairability
40%

Software Updates
22.3%

Total Sustainability Score: 30.7%

Possible alternatives compared

Image	Model / Review	Price	Weight	Height	Display
1. 88%	Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX ⎘ Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop ⎘ 64 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD	Amazon: 1. $2,899.00 ASUS ROG Strix Scar 16 (2024... 2. $6.99 Keyboard Cover for 2025 2024... 3. $6.90 Keyboard Cover for 2025-2023... List Price: 5799€	3.3 kg	32 mm	18.00" 2560x1600 168 PPI Mini-LED
2. 90.5% ^{v7 (old)}	Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 Intel Core i9-14900HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory	Amazon: $4,899.99 List Price: 4500 USD	3.1 kg	21.9 mm	18.00" 2560x1600 168 PPI Mini-LED
3. 89.5% ^{v7 (old)}	Alienware m18 R2 Intel Core i9-14900HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD	Amazon: 1. $2,799.99 Alienware M18 R2 Gaming Lapt... 2. $4,799.99 Alienware Dell M18 R2 Gaming... 3. $2,599.00 NewDell Alien.Ware M18 R2 Ga... List Price: 3300 USD	4 kg	26.7 mm	18.00" 2560x1600 168 PPI IPS
4. 87.1% ^{v7 (old)}	Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Core i9-14900HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD	Amazon: 1. $99.99 330W Genuine Charger for Ace... 2. $99.99 330W Genuine Charger for Ace... 3. $179.99 PEHDPVS Replacement for Acer...	3.3 kg	29.5 mm	18.00" 2560x1600 168 PPI Mini-LED
5. 88.8% ^{v7 (old)}	MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU ⎘ 128 GB Memory, 4096 GB SSD	Amazon: 1. $189.00 400W ADP-400CB B laptop char... 2. $159.99 400W Charger for Msi Titan 1... 3. $408.98 Factory Original 64GB (2x32G... List Price: 5000 USD	3.6 kg	32.1 mm	18.00" 3840x2400 252 PPI Mini-LED
6. 85.1%	SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) Intel Core i9-14900HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD	List Price: 4273€	3.4 kg	24.9 mm	17.30" 3840x2160 255 PPI IPS

Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core in comparison
Asus ExpertCenter PN42-BBN200MV (min) N200, UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs	91
...
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max M4 Max (16 cores), M4 Max 40-Core GPU	2069
i9-14900K, Radeon RX 7900 XTX	2112
i9-14900K, Radeon RX 7800 XT	2151
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	2223
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	2223
i9-14900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090	2352
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D Ryzen 9 9950X3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090	2365
...
(max) TR Pro 7995WX, RTX 6000 Ada Generation	5372

3DMark 11 in comparison
HP Stream 7 5700ng (min) Z3735G, HD Graphics (Bay Trail)	183
...
i5-13600K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090	47895
i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090	47984
R9 7900X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090	48185
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	48486
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	48486
i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090	48533
Alienware m18 R2 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	48622
...
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Founders Edition (max) R7 9800X3D, GeForce RTX 5090	82642

结论：更强劲的动力、更时尚的外壳和出色的微型 LED 面板

Pros

Cons

价格和供应情况

Table of Contents

规格

案例 - 光照充足，阴影较少

尺寸比较

连接性 - 配备 Thunderbolt 5 的 SCAR 18

交流

网络摄像头

配件

维护

可持续性

输入设备

显示屏 - 240 赫兹的超小型 LED 面板

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

性能 - Arrow Lake-HX 和 RTX 5000 笔记本电脑

测试条件

处理器 - Core Ultra 9 275HX

Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test

系统性能

DPC 延迟

存储设备

Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

图形卡

游戏性能

Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram

排放量

噪音排放

温度

发言人

Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX audio analysis

Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 audio analysis

Alienware m18 R2 audio analysis

Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW audio analysis

MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG audio analysis

SCHENKER Key 17 Pro (M24) audio analysis

Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) audio analysis

能源管理 - 电池寿命短

耗电量

Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test

Power consumption with external monitor

运行时间

Notebookcheck 总评分

Possible alternatives compared

More articles related to this device

Transparency