LG Gram 15Z90P评论：1.1公斤（约2.4磅）的15英寸笔记本电脑

Name: LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G
Brand: LG

80瓦的奇迹。

在看到14、16和17英寸的LG Grams之后，我们几乎对看到15英寸的型号感到惊讶。重量也是这里的主要特点。 1.1公斤（约2.4磅）。最轻的15英寸竞争对手的重量从1.3公斤（约2.87磅）到1.5公斤（约3.31磅）不等。阅读我们的评论，了解LG Gram 15是否真的能在一次电池充电的情况下持续14小时。

Sebastian Jentsch, 👁 Sebastian Jentsch (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 01/28/2022 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Windows Ultrabook Tiger Lake Thunderbolt

LG Gram 15（2021年）--1.1公斤（约2.4磅）的超轻笔记本电脑，配备80瓦时电池

LG的Gram系列由世界上最轻的笔记本电脑组成，每一种屏幕尺寸都有。LG提供以下尺寸的Gram笔记本电脑。14英寸，15英寸，16英寸和17英寸。在这里，我们有一个15英寸的模型。我们已经审查了其他型号。

前身。

LG Gram 15 15Z90N(2020)

LG集中所有精力制造世界上最轻的15英寸笔记本电脑，并在此方面取得了成功。三星的Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver是最接近的竞争者，重量仅为1.3公斤（约2.87磅）。这款微星Summit B15 A11M和 Honor MagicBook 15是普通的15英寸笔记本电脑，重量约为1.5公斤（约3.31磅）。

为了减少400克（约0.88磅），LG牺牲了什么？硬度、电池寿命？2021年的Gram 15在内部和外部都进行了重新设计。与2020年基于Ice Lake 的Gram 15相比，其设计、端口的选择和内部布局都发生了变化。

Test device courtesy of cyberport.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G (gram 15 Series)

Processor

Intel Core i7-1165G7 4 x 2.8 - 4.7 GHz, 40 W PL2 / Short Burst, 25 W PL1 / Sustained, Tiger Lake-UP3

Graphics adapter

Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Core: 1300 MHz, RAM: 1600 MHz

Memory

16 GB

, LPDDR4X-4266, 2 slots, max 16 GB

Display

15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, LG Display LP156WFC-SPY1, IPS 99% sRGB, glossy: yes, 60 Hz

Mainboard

Intel Tiger Lake-UP3 PCH-LP

Storage

SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N, 1024 GB

, M.2 PCIe (2280), 815 GB free

Soundcard

Intel Tiger Lake-U/Y PCH-LP - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)

Connections

2 USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 20Gbps, 2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: Combo, Card Reader: microSD, 1 Fingerprint Reader

Networking

Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.1

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 17.4 x 356.9 x 224

Battery

80 Wh Lithium-Ion

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 11 Home

Camera

Webcam: 1280x720

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, DTS:X Ultra, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

1.107 kg, Power Supply: 292 g

Links

LG homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Likely Competitors

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
84.9 % v7 ^(old)	01 / 2022	LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	1.1 kg	17.4 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
86.3 % v7 ^(old)	09 / 2021	LG Gram 16 (2021) i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	1.2 kg	16.8 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
81.7 % v7 ^(old)		Samsung Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver i7-10510U, GeForce MX250	1.3 kg	15 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
83.6 % v7 ^(old)	08 / 2021	Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	1.5 kg	17 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
81.2 % v7 ^(old)		MSI Summit B15 A11M i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	1.5 kg	16.9 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
82 % v7 ^(old)		Samsung Galaxy Book NP750XDA i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	1.6 kg	16 mm	15.60"	1920x1080

案例："僵硬 "并不能说明LG笔记本电脑的情况

2021年的克15（1.107公斤/~2.440磅）比2020年的克15（1.093公斤/~2.410磅）重了几克。这并不是由于材料的改变，因为两款笔记本电脑的外壳仍然是由镁制成的。这里只有点缀着钥匙孔的顶盖提供了刚性，因为底盖极薄且可弯曲。铰链和所有部件都连接在顶盖上。

如上所述，底盖非常薄且易碎，但它（在螺丝的帮助下）牢牢地连接在顶盖上。总而言之，当你把它拿在手里时，这台笔记本电脑给人的印象是好坏参半。一方面，对于这样一个轻型设备来说，它感觉相当硬。另一方面，铝制外壳的笔记本电脑感觉更结实、更高档，但重量更大。这并不令人惊讶，毕竟，用镁制造一个感觉僵硬的轻巧设备几乎是不可能的。

有趣的是，LG不得不采用一种框架来固定电池，并确保它不会扭动得太厉害。

显示屏的盖子也真的很灵活。然而，这似乎不会对内置的IPS面板造成任何问题，因为它是直接与显示屏盖子耦合的。在过去，制造商试图避免这样做，因为这曾经导致视觉伪影，有时还会导致损坏。然而，现在除了打开盖子时，没有任何视觉伪影。

LG使设计更有棱角，这在看底盖时也很明显。现在还多了几颗螺丝。

在重量方面，Gram 15远远领先于竞争对手。比如说三星Galaxy Book Ion比它重200克（约0.44磅），但它也是由镁制成的，感觉很松散。更重的15英寸笔记本电脑，如峰会B15，感觉很硬，但其外壳是由铝制成的。

Size Comparison

Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G MSI Summit B15 A11M Samsung Galaxy Book NP750XDA LG Gram 16 (2021) Samsung Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver DIN A4 ❌

连接性

过去只有一个Thunderbolt（3）端口，现在有两个Thunderbolt（4）端口。其中一个端口支持Power Delivery功能。这一次，没有专门的充电端口。这两个USB-A端口非常快（3.2 Gen2）。

HDMI输出，两个Thunderbolt 4（Power Delivery）端口，耳机/麦克风插孔

microSD读卡器，两个USB-A（3.2 Gen2）端口，Kensington锁。

SD卡阅读器

microSD读卡器位于右侧，以USB 3.0速度运行。插入的SD卡只从插槽中稍微伸出来。在我们使用参考级SD卡（AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60）的测试中，Gram 15取得了良好的结果，不过这只足以让它在我们的比较表中占据一个位置。Gram 16取得了同样的结果，可能是因为两台设备都有相同的读卡器。微星微星Summit B15 A11M显示了当今读卡器的能力。

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
MSI Summit B15 A11M (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	154.2 MB/s +99%
Samsung Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)	80 MB/s +3%
LG Gram 16 (2021) (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)	78.6 MB/s +2%
LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	77.4 MB/s
Average of class Subnotebook (18.4 - 142, n=14, last 2 years)	54.3 MB/s -30%
Samsung Galaxy Book NP750XDA (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	35 MB/s -55%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
MSI Summit B15 A11M (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	191.5 MB/s +114%
LG Gram 16 (2021) (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)	90.5 MB/s +1%
LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	89.6 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)	89 MB/s -1%
Average of class Subnotebook (22.5 - 207, n=14, last 2 years)	72.6 MB/s -19%
Samsung Galaxy Book NP750XDA (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	36.5 MB/s -59%

Legend

LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N

LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG

Samsung Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-512GB

Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G

MSI Summit B15 A11M Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Kingston OM8PCP31024F

Samsung Galaxy Book NP750XDA Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Lite-On CL1-8D512

Average of class Subnotebook

沟通

Gram 15在我们的Wi-Fi对比图中占据了第一位。总而言之，它的表现比使用英特尔AX201的普通设备好。在这里， LG Gram 16的速度要慢46%到140%，鉴于这两款设备都有相同的Wi-Fi模块，这非常令人惊讶。该三星Galaxy Book Ion Aura在某些方面与格拉姆15处于同一水平。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Samsung Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1614 (1316^min - 1783^max) MBit/s +11%
Samsung Galaxy Book NP750XDA Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1462 (533^min - 1586^max) MBit/s +1%
LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1453 (705^min - 1638^max) MBit/s
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1400 (1264^min - 1496^max) MBit/s -4%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (49.8 - 1775, n=324)	1161 MBit/s -20%
MSI Summit B15 A11M Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1026 (626^min - 1235^max) MBit/s -29%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	932 (463^min - 990^max) MBit/s -36%
iperf3 receive AX12
Samsung Galaxy Book NP750XDA Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1623 (1565^min - 1675^max) MBit/s +2%
LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1587 (1421^min - 1707^max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1408 (1262^min - 1435^max) MBit/s -11%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1385 (910^min - 1612^max) MBit/s -13%
MSI Summit B15 A11M Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1267 (1175^min - 1403^max) MBit/s -20%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (136 - 1743, n=324)	1261 MBit/s -21%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	664 (646^min - 684^max) MBit/s -58%

LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1586 (1421-1707)

LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø664 (646-684)

LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1430 (705-1638)

LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø917 (463-990)

网络摄像机

网络摄像头有一个0.9百万像素（1280x720）的传感器，能产生冲淡和模糊的图像。在弱光环境下，也有一大堆噪音。图像质量处于非常低的水平，这也是当今笔记本电脑摄像头的特点。Gram 15的网络摄像头的色彩表现特别差。在这里，更便宜的Honor MagicBook要好得多。

ColorChecker LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G: 24.02 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 35.24 ∆E

安全问题

Gram 15有一个Kensignton锁和一个指纹传感器，它被整合到电源按钮中。

辅料

除了常见的保修和安全手册外，Gram 15的包装盒里还有一个65瓦的电源适配器。这次没有以太网适配器。

维护

Gram 15不再有任何内存插槽，这意味着内存是不可扩展/可更换的。Wi-Fi模块也是焊接而成的。在2020年，情况也是如此。但仍然有两个M.2（88毫米）插槽，其中一个是空的，这意味着用户仍然可以轻松地安装另一个固态硬盘。电池可以更换，因为它只是用螺丝固定。

拆卸很简单：只需取下塑料脚，解开螺丝，用吉他挑子或spudger取下底盖。底板可以被卸下，而不会在设备上留下任何划痕或擦痕。

担保

LG Gram 15有24个月的保修期（包括在德国和其他国家）。

输入设备。带数字键盘的Gram 15

Gram 15应该是一个工作设备，这就是为什么它有一个带数字键盘的键盘。布局没有改变，但功能键的颜色从橙色变成了白色。这就是为什么功能键不再那么显眼了。

键盘

按键感觉稳定，并提供良好的触觉反馈。启动点很清晰，而且按键的移动距离也很合适。打字时，键盘面板表现出一些弯曲。

键的间距很好，比通常的笔记本电脑键大一毫米左右。然而，数字键盘的按键很小。此外，数字键盘没有 "加"、"减 "和 "回车 "等键。

触摸板

触摸板的尺寸为11.1x6.9厘米（4.37x2.72英寸）。触摸板运行良好。它对输入的反应迅速而可靠。底部有两个物理按钮，有一个非常清晰的启动点，并提供非常好的触觉反馈。

显示屏。LG面板具有高反射率的表面

Gram 15采用全高清15.6英寸面板，像素密度为144PPI。这块IPS面板是由LG Display制造的。我们测量的峰值亮度为310cd/m²，这是一个相当不错的结果。三星Galaxy Book Ion的显示屏达到了467 cd/m²的亮度。在电池供电时，亮度下降到299 cd/m²。

由于黑值不高（0.46 cd/m²），对比度也相当差（746:1）。前代机型（1307:1）和Gram 16（1505:1）的屏幕对比度明显更好。Gram 15的屏幕不存在屏幕出血和PWM闪烁的问题。


304 cd/m²	310 cd/m²	312 cd/m²
295 cd/m²	343 cd/m²	306 cd/m²
300 cd/m²	313 cd/m²	312 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

LG Display LP156WFC-SPY1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 343 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 310.6 cd/m² Minimum: 22 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 299 cd/m²
Contrast: 746:1 (Black: 0.46 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.17
ΔE Greyscale 4.35 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
64% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
92% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
62% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.55

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G LG Display LP156WFC-SPY1, IPS 99% sRGB, 1920x1080, 15.6"	LG Gram 16 (2021) LG Philips LP160WQ1-SPA1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	Samsung Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver BOE0889, QLED, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 BOE TV156FHM-NH2, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	MSI Summit B15 A11M Chi Mei N156HCE-EN1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Samsung Galaxy Book NP750XDA CEC PANDA LM156LF5L03, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Display		31%	35%	5%	2%
Display P3 Coverage	62	95.8 55%	99.1 60%	65.4 5%	65.7 6%
sRGB Coverage	92	99.8 8%	99.9 9%	96.3 5%	90.6 -2%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	64	83.8 31%	87.3 36%	67.5 5%	66 3%
Response Times		-17%	-49%	-19%	-46%	-2%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	36 ?(18, 18)	44 ?(19, 25) -22%	49 ?(22, 27) -36%	36 ?(18, 18) -0%	40.4 ?(20.4, 20) -12%	29 ?(13, 16) 19%
Response Time Black / White *	18 ?(8, 10)	20 ?(8, 12) -11%	29 ?(15, 14) -61%	24.8 ?(14, 10.8) -38%	32.4 ?(18.4, 14) -80%	22 ?(12, 10) -22%
PWM Frequency					25510 ?(25)
Screen		-19%	39%	9%	-46%	-7%
Brightness middle	343	331 -3%	467 36%	332 -3%	341.3 0%	325 -5%
Brightness	311	309 -1%	437 41%	318 2%	310 0%	297 -5%
Brightness Distribution	86	88 2%	91 6%	87 1%	81 -6%	86 0%
Black Level *	0.46	0.22 52%	0.27 41%	0.27 41%	0.45 2%	0.445 3%
Contrast	746	1505 102%	1730 132%	1230 65%	758 2%	730 -2%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	3.5	4.64 -33%	3.39 3%	3.3 6%	6.17 -76%	3.48 1%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	6.25	9.82 -57%	6.27 -0%	7.8 -25%	11.75 -88%	8.07 -29%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	1.17	3.16 -170%		1 15%	3.3 -182%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	4.35	6.9 -59%	2.17 50%	5.2 -20%	7.1 -63%	5.27 -21%
Gamma	2.55 ^86%	2.34 ^94%	2.45 ^90%	2.07 ^106%	2.2 ^100%	2.41 ^91%
CCT	6016 ^108%	7904 ^82%	6488 ^100%	7370 ^88%	6842 ^95%	7769 ^84%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)		75.1	78		58.7	44
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)		100	100		90.1	70
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-2% / -8%	8% / 24%	-2% / 4%	-30% / -35%	-5% / -6%

* ... smaller is better

LG宣称，该显示屏可以覆盖99%的sRGB。然而，我们的测量结果显示，IPS面板只能覆盖92%的sRGB。P3（62%）和AdobeRGB（64%）的覆盖率也不完整。Gram 16在这个领域做得更好。这很可能是LG没有将Gram 15的种子提供给评审员的原因之一。

我们使用Calman软件和分光光度计来确定显示器的色彩准确性。刚开箱时，灰度表现不是特别好（这里的DeltaE高于4）。此外，对于训练有素的眼睛来说，颜色看起来并不十分正确。然而，在校准的帮助下，色彩再现可以得到改善。你可以通过包含所有显示器测量值的盒子底部的链接下载我们为LG Display LP156WFC-SPY1设计的色彩配置文件。

我们的校准显著改善了色彩再现。校准后，DeltaE从3.5下降到1.2。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
18 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 8 ms rise
18 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 10 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 18 ms rise
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 18 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 46 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

光滑的面板不适合在户外使用，特别是考虑到电池供电时的亮度约为300cd/m²。这限制了Gram 15在旅途中的可用性。

IPS面板的可视角度非常好。亮度只在极端角度下下降。锐角下的色彩准确性也较差。

性能。在短期工作负荷中表现良好

Tiger Lake 基于酷睿i7-1165G7的英特尔Iris Xe图形（96EUs）。

2021年的Gram 15有两种配置：一种是采用酷睿i7-1165G7(4 x 2.8 - 4.7 GHz)，另一个配置为酷睿i5-1135G7(所谓的商务版)。两种型号都有16GB的内存。然而，酷睿i5变体有一个512GB的固态硬盘，而酷睿i7型号则有一个1TB的固态硬盘。这些都是相当高端的配置，这反映在1150欧元（约1280美元）至1600欧元（约1780美元）的价格上。

系统设置

在进行任何基准测试之前，我们下载并安装了最新的BIOS和Windows更新。我们在GPU和CPU基准测试中使用了 "最佳性能 "的电源模式。对于我们的电池测试（Wi-Fi/空闲），我们使用了 "最佳电源效率 "电源模式，该模式现在在Windows 11中可用。新的省电模式禁用了通知并限制了后台任务，这意味着One Drive等应用程序在这种模式下不会不断刷新。

处理器

芯片酷睿i7-1165G7(Tiger Lake, UP3) 是最快的28W CPU之一。它的TDP可以从12到28W不等。LG将功率级别一（PL1）设置为25W，这就是我们在测试中看到的情况。然而，该CPU只能在短时间内保持这一功率水平。总而言之，这些功率水平使应用程序能够快速启动，系统在日常使用中感觉非常灵敏。

不过，Gram 15的GPU并不适合持续负载。在我们的Cinebench 15循环中，功耗在片刻间达到40瓦的峰值，然后降至约20瓦。在全负荷下，功耗在10至20瓦之间波动，罕见的峰值为25瓦。

总而言之，LG Gram 15中的Core i7-1165G7的性能比一般的Core i7-1165G7差28%。这似乎是LG笔记本电脑的普遍特点。Gram 16的CPU性能也不尽如人意，但性能水平并没有偏离常规那么多。

将Gram 15与竞争对手进行比较时，我们看到三星Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver与较老的酷睿i7-10510U在负载下表现得更好。微星Summit B15，拥有更强大的冷却解决方案和更高的PL1和PL2，显示了Core i7-1165G7的能力。例如，微星Summit B15在负载下比Gram 15快40%。

因此，在Cinebench R20和R23中，Gram 15被配备Core i5-1135G7和Core i7-1165G7的笔记本电脑击败，这并不令人惊讶。Gram 15在AIDA基准测试中也表现不佳。

Cinebench R15 multi-core loop

LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G Intel Core i7-1165G7: Ø568 (450.71-769.42)

LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7: Ø596 (474.78-805.25)

Samsung Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver Intel Core i7-10510U: Ø656 (607.23-685.84)

Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Core i5-1135G7: Ø699 (681.19-922.04)

MSI Summit B15 A11M Intel Core i7-1165G7: Ø937 (912.76-946.14)

Samsung Galaxy Book NP750XDA Intel Core i5-1135G7: Ø824 (808.51-862.42)

CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

CPU Performance Rating
Average of class Subnotebook	86 pt
MSI Summit B15 A11M Intel Core i7-1165G7	60.3 pt
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7	56.1 pt
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7	52.5 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book NP750XDA ^-2! Intel Core i5-1135G7	50.5 pt
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Core i5-1135G7	48.5 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver ^-2! Intel Core i7-10510U	43.6 pt
LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G Intel Core i7-1165G7	43.2 pt

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Average of class Subnotebook (1555 - 21812, n=63, last 2 years)	11681 Points +285%
MSI Summit B15 A11M Intel Core i7-1165G7	6215 (5984.06^min - 6214.73^max) Points +105%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (2525 - 6862, n=64)	5110 Points +68%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7	4652 Points +53%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Core i5-1135G7	3717 Points +22%
LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G Intel Core i7-1165G7	3037 (2980.96^min - 3037.14^max) Points

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Average of class Subnotebook (358 - 2001, n=63, last 2 years)	1670 Points +40%
MSI Summit B15 A11M Intel Core i7-1165G7	1453 Points +21%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (1110 - 1539, n=59)	1425 Points +19%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Core i5-1135G7	1350 Points +13%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7	1311 Points +10%
LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G Intel Core i7-1165G7	1196 Points

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Subnotebook (579 - 8541, n=59, last 2 years)	4542 Points +282%
MSI Summit B15 A11M Intel Core i7-1165G7	2405 Points +102%
Samsung Galaxy Book NP750XDA Intel Core i5-1135G7	2105 Points +77%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (1060 - 2657, n=81)	1967 Points +65%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7	1847 Points +55%
Samsung Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver Intel Core i7-10510U	1597 Points +34%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Core i5-1135G7	1448 Points +22%
LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G Intel Core i7-1165G7	1189 Points

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Subnotebook (128 - 790, n=59, last 2 years)	636 Points +36%
MSI Summit B15 A11M Intel Core i7-1165G7	565 Points +21%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (442 - 589, n=81)	552 Points +18%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7	518 Points +11%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Core i5-1135G7	514 Points +10%
LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G Intel Core i7-1165G7	467 Points
Samsung Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver Intel Core i7-10510U	452 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy Book NP750XDA Intel Core i5-1135G7	442 Points -5%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Subnotebook (327 - 3345, n=65, last 2 years)	1983 Points +158%
MSI Summit B15 A11M Intel Core i7-1165G7	946 (912.76^min - 946.14^max) Points +23%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Core i5-1135G7	922 Points +20%
Samsung Galaxy Book NP750XDA Intel Core i5-1135G7	862 (808.51^min - 862.42^max) Points +12%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (553 - 1027, n=86)	846 Points +10%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7	805 Points +5%
LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G Intel Core i7-1165G7	769 Points
Samsung Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver Intel Core i7-10510U	688 (575.7^min - 685.84^max) Points -11%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Subnotebook (72.4 - 307, n=60, last 2 years)	250 Points +38%
MSI Summit B15 A11M Intel Core i7-1165G7	217 Points +20%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (115 - 230, n=78)	212 Points +17%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7	205 Points +13%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Core i5-1135G7	201 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy Book NP750XDA Intel Core i5-1135G7	195 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy Book NP750XDA Intel Core i5-1135G7	194 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver Intel Core i7-10510U	191 Points +6%
LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G Intel Core i7-1165G7	181 Points

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G Intel Core i7-1165G7	878 Seconds *
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7	771 Seconds * +12%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Core i5-1135G7	711 Seconds * +19%
Samsung Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver Intel Core i7-10510U	671 Seconds * +24%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (468 - 1138, n=80)	618 Seconds * +30%
Samsung Galaxy Book NP750XDA Intel Core i5-1135G7	602 Seconds * +31%
MSI Summit B15 A11M Intel Core i7-1165G7	492 Seconds * +44%
Average of class Subnotebook (159 - 2271, n=63, last 2 years)	360 Seconds * +59%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Average of class Subnotebook (11775 - 77867, n=56, last 2 years)	48300 MIPS +215%
MSI Summit B15 A11M Intel Core i7-1165G7	25410 MIPS +66%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (15347 - 27405, n=80)	22935 MIPS +49%
Samsung Galaxy Book NP750XDA Intel Core i5-1135G7	22772 MIPS +48%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7	22300 MIPS +45%
Samsung Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver Intel Core i7-10510U	19566 MIPS +27%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Core i5-1135G7	17591 MIPS +15%
LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G Intel Core i7-1165G7	15347 MIPS

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Subnotebook (2669 - 6403, n=58, last 2 years)	5478 MIPS +16%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (4478 - 5507, n=80)	5182 MIPS +10%
MSI Summit B15 A11M Intel Core i7-1165G7	5125 MIPS +9%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7	5113 MIPS +8%
Samsung Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver Intel Core i7-10510U	4981 MIPS +6%
Samsung Galaxy Book NP750XDA Intel Core i5-1135G7	4728 MIPS 0%
LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G Intel Core i7-1165G7	4720 MIPS
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Core i5-1135G7	3924 MIPS -17%

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Average of class Subnotebook (2557 - 14728, n=58, last 2 years)	10135 Points +111%
MSI Summit B15 A11M Intel Core i7-1165G7	5290 Points +10%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7	5163 Points +7%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (3078 - 5926, n=77)	5155 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy Book NP750XDA Intel Core i5-1135G7	4876 Points +1%
LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G Intel Core i7-1165G7	4810 Points
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Core i5-1135G7	4742 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver Intel Core i7-10510U	3486 Points -28%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Average of class Subnotebook (621 - 2350, n=58, last 2 years)	1795 Points +23%
MSI Summit B15 A11M Intel Core i7-1165G7	1545 Points +6%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (1302 - 1595, n=77)	1524 Points +4%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7	1500 Points +3%
LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G Intel Core i7-1165G7	1462 Points
Samsung Galaxy Book NP750XDA Intel Core i5-1135G7	1405 Points -4%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Core i5-1135G7	1401 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver Intel Core i7-10510U	1245 Points -15%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Average of class Subnotebook (0.97 - 25.1, n=58, last 2 years)	12.9 fps +254%
MSI Summit B15 A11M Intel Core i7-1165G7	7.98 fps +119%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (1.39 - 8.47, n=80)	6.3 fps +73%
Samsung Galaxy Book NP750XDA Intel Core i5-1135G7	6.15 fps +69%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Core i5-1135G7	5.66 fps +55%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7	5.63 fps +55%
Samsung Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver Intel Core i7-10510U	5.15 fps +41%
LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G Intel Core i7-1165G7	3.64 fps

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Samsung Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver Intel Core i7-10510U	67.9 s * -27%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Core i5-1135G7	54.4 s * -2%
Average of class Subnotebook (38.5 - 220, n=57, last 2 years)	54.4 s * -2%
MSI Summit B15 A11M Intel Core i7-1165G7	54.1 s * -1%
LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G Intel Core i7-1165G7	53.5 s *
Samsung Galaxy Book NP750XDA Intel Core i5-1135G7	52.9 s * +1%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (21.5 - 88.1, n=78)	49.2 s * +8%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7	45.9 s * +14%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G Intel Core i7-1165G7	0.696 sec *
Samsung Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver Intel Core i7-10510U	0.646 sec * +7%
Samsung Galaxy Book NP750XDA Intel Core i5-1135G7	0.639 sec * +8%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7	0.625 sec * +10%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Core i5-1135G7	0.622 sec * +11%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (0.552 - 1.002, n=80)	0.594 sec * +15%
MSI Summit B15 A11M Intel Core i7-1165G7	0.576 sec * +17%
Average of class Subnotebook (0.413 - 1.456, n=58, last 2 years)	0.52 sec * +25%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

769 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

97.7 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.8 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

181 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

1189 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

467 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

1196 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

3037 Points

Help

... in comparison

Performance Rating
Average of class Subnotebook	98 pt
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	59.4 pt
MSI Summit B15 A11M Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	58.9 pt
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7	58.9 pt
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	55.5 pt
LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	47.4 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver Intel Core i7-10510U, GeForce MX250	41.7 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book NP750XDA ^-9! Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	0 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Average of class Subnotebook (1141 - 32888, n=58, last 2 years)	12741 KRay/s +141%
MSI Summit B15 A11M Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	7318 KRay/s +38%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (3933 - 8184, n=58)	6555 KRay/s +24%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	6299 KRay/s +19%
LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	5284 KRay/s
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	4894 KRay/s -7%
Samsung Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver Intel Core i7-10510U, GeForce MX250	4773 KRay/s -10%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Average of class Subnotebook (6838 - 123315, n=58, last 2 years)	60264 Points +166%
MSI Summit B15 A11M Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	30303 Points +34%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	28636 Points +27%
Samsung Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver Intel Core i7-10510U, GeForce MX250	28381 Points +25%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (17720 - 34369, n=58)	27783 Points +23%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	23249 Points +3%
LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	22616 Points

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average of class Subnotebook (444 - 5287, n=58, last 2 years)	2898 MB/s +93%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	2172 MB/s +45%
MSI Summit B15 A11M Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	1988 MB/s +32%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (958 - 2338, n=58)	1867 MB/s +24%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	1573 MB/s +5%
LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	1501 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver Intel Core i7-10510U, GeForce MX250	1277 MB/s -15%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Average of class Subnotebook (11579 - 115682, n=58, last 2 years)	79022 Points +79%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	50442 Points +14%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (44161 - 50624, n=58)	49716 Points +13%
MSI Summit B15 A11M Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	47778 Points +8%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	46799 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver Intel Core i7-10510U, GeForce MX250	46468 Points +5%
LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	44161 Points

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Average of class Subnotebook (744 - 18418, n=58, last 2 years)	7916 Points +115%
MSI Summit B15 A11M Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	4549 Points +23%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	4445 Points +21%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (3183 - 4796, n=58)	4431 Points +20%
Samsung Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver Intel Core i7-10510U, GeForce MX250	4347 Points +18%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	4038 Points +10%
LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	3686 Points

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Average of class Subnotebook (3366 - 65433, n=58, last 2 years)	31330 Points +131%
MSI Summit B15 A11M Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	18168 Points +34%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	17101 Points +26%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (11876 - 20468, n=58)	16813 Points +24%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	14077 Points +4%
LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	13539 Points
Samsung Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver Intel Core i7-10510U, GeForce MX250	12378 Points -9%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	67951 MB/s +130%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (29506 - 73387, n=58)	62121 MB/s +111%
Average of class Subnotebook (638 - 161430, n=58, last 2 years)	60058 MB/s +104%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	58344 MB/s +98%
MSI Summit B15 A11M Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	42946 MB/s +46%
LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	29506 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver Intel Core i7-10510U, GeForce MX250	18153 MB/s -38%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average of class Subnotebook (166.9 - 1379, n=58, last 2 years)	742 MB/s +224%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	363 MB/s +59%
MSI Summit B15 A11M Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	345 MB/s +51%
Samsung Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver Intel Core i7-10510U, GeForce MX250	314 MB/s +37%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (169 - 402, n=65)	304 MB/s +33%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	287 MB/s +25%
LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	229 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Book NP750XDA Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	0 MB/s -100%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Average of class Subnotebook (610 - 17495, n=58, last 2 years)	6601 KRay/s +137%
MSI Summit B15 A11M Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	3942 KRay/s +42%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (2033 - 4461, n=58)	3525 KRay/s +27%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	3283 KRay/s +18%
LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	2784 KRay/s
Samsung Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver Intel Core i7-10510U, GeForce MX250	2747 KRay/s -1%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	2579 KRay/s -7%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	44296 MPixel/s +23%
Average of class Subnotebook (6569 - 54881, n=58, last 2 years)	40710 MPixel/s +13%
LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	36037 MPixel/s
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (12392 - 45694, n=58)	30266 MPixel/s -16%
MSI Summit B15 A11M Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	29822 MPixel/s -17%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	23519 MPixel/s -35%
Samsung Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver Intel Core i7-10510U, GeForce MX250	11054 MPixel/s -69%

系统性能

在PCMark 10基准测试中，鉴于Gram 15在CPU基准测试中表现不佳，它的表现比预期要好。我们的LG样品在我们的比较图表的顶部附近占据了一个位置，并成功地超过了MSI Summit B15.AIDA内存基准测试证实，我们的评测设备在复制和写入数据方面领先于竞争对手。事实上，它还击败了Gram 16。不过，在涉及到内存延迟时，竞争对手是领先的。

PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation

PCMark 10 / Score
Average of class Subnotebook (4993 - 7788, n=50, last 2 years)	6454 Points +35%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (4531 - 5454, n=50)	4959 Points +3%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG	4917 Points +3%
LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	4792 Points
MSI Summit B15 A11M Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Kingston OM8PCP31024F	4753 Points -1%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	4690 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy Book NP750XDA Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Lite-On CL1-8D512	4668 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver GeForce MX250, i7-10510U, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-512GB	3891 Points -19%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Average of class Subnotebook (9476 - 11331, n=50, last 2 years)	10490 Points +6%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG	10149 Points +2%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (8997 - 11505, n=50)	10014 Points +1%
LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	9929 Points
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	9666 Points -3%
MSI Summit B15 A11M Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Kingston OM8PCP31024F	9498 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy Book NP750XDA Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Lite-On CL1-8D512	9224 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver GeForce MX250, i7-10510U, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-512GB	8021 Points -19%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Average of class Subnotebook (6440 - 10623, n=50, last 2 years)	8635 Points +31%
Samsung Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver GeForce MX250, i7-10510U, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-512GB	7016 Points +6%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG	6888 Points +4%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (5570 - 7136, n=50)	6711 Points +2%
LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	6595 Points
MSI Summit B15 A11M Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Kingston OM8PCP31024F	6158 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy Book NP750XDA Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Lite-On CL1-8D512	6151 Points -7%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	6140 Points -7%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Average of class Subnotebook (5305 - 10983, n=50, last 2 years)	8143 Points +79%
MSI Summit B15 A11M Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Kingston OM8PCP31024F	4983 Points +9%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (4083 - 5550, n=50)	4937 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy Book NP750XDA Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Lite-On CL1-8D512	4866 Points +7%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	4719 Points +3%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG	4616 Points +1%
LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	4561 Points
Samsung Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver GeForce MX250, i7-10510U, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-512GB	2841 Points -38%

PCMark 10 Score		4792 points
Help

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Average of class Subnotebook (14916 - 108756, n=58, last 2 years)	71859 MB/s +24%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	64091 MB/s +11%
LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	57848 MB/s
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (20032 - 65446, n=58)	46476 MB/s -20%
MSI Summit B15 A11M Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	38300 MB/s -34%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	34501 MB/s -40%
Samsung Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver Intel Core i7-10510U, GeForce MX250	17695 MB/s -69%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Average of class Subnotebook (15948 - 122210, n=58, last 2 years)	69350 MB/s +21%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	62442 MB/s +9%
LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	57545 MB/s
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (23033 - 64524, n=58)	48851 MB/s -15%
MSI Summit B15 A11M Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	44836 MB/s -22%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	43385 MB/s -25%
Samsung Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver Intel Core i7-10510U, GeForce MX250	19560 MB/s -66%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Average of class Subnotebook (16513 - 117898, n=58, last 2 years)	74703 MB/s +25%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	66479 MB/s +11%
LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	59982 MB/s
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (21736 - 66791, n=58)	49822 MB/s -17%
MSI Summit B15 A11M Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	44485 MB/s -26%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	40918 MB/s -32%
Samsung Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver Intel Core i7-10510U, GeForce MX250	19682 MB/s -67%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	110 ns *
Average of class Subnotebook (7.2 - 187.8, n=58, last 2 years)	105.3 ns * +4%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	92.6 ns * +16%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	80 ns * +27%
Samsung Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver Intel Core i7-10510U, GeForce MX250	78.1 ns * +29%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (69 - 110, n=65)	76 ns * +31%
MSI Summit B15 A11M Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	75.3 ns * +32%
Samsung Galaxy Book NP750XDA Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	0 ns * +100%

* ... smaller is better

DPC延迟

说到DPC延迟，Gram 15的表现不是特别好。即使有几个打开的浏览器标签，我们也看到了延迟的峰值。然而，在YouTube的测试中没有问题（只有3个丢帧）。在测试中，我们使用了微软的Edge浏览器的默认设置。我们还使用了 "最佳性能 "的电源模式。这里的主要问题在于ACPI驱动程序。16英寸机型没有这些问题（420对1662微秒）。这有可能只是我们特定评测设备特有的一次性问题。我们的DPC测试是在我们审查时使用最新的可用驱动程序进行的。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Samsung Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver GeForce MX250, i7-10510U, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-512GB	2817 μs * -69%
LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	1662 μs *
Samsung Galaxy Book NP750XDA Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Lite-On CL1-8D512	1267 μs * +24%
MSI Summit B15 A11M Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Kingston OM8PCP31024F	772 μs * +54%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	649 μs * +61%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG	420.3 μs * +75%

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

一块1TB的SK海力士固态硬盘被安装在一个M.2插槽中。另一块SSD可以安装在第二个M.2插槽中，该插槽是空的。用户可以获得815GB的存储空间。固态硬盘的性能优于平均水平，这可能是我们在PCMark 10中获得非常好分数的原因。的LG Gram 16 (2021)没有相同的SK海力士固态硬盘，但在存储基准方面的表现仍然非常相似。

AS SSD

DiskSpd

SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N

Sequential Read: 2641MB/s

Sequential Write: 2795MB/s

4K Read: 61.6MB/s

4K Write: 136.2MB/s

4K-64 Read: 1645MB/s

4K-64 Write: 1585MB/s

Access Time Read: 0.042ms

Access Time Write: 0.029ms

Score Read: 1972Points

Score Write: 2001Points

Score Total: 4997Points

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	83 pt
LG Gram 16 (2021) SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG	81.9 pt
Average of class Subnotebook	81.8 pt
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	81.5 pt
Average SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	75.1 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-512GB	67.8 pt
MSI Summit B15 A11M Kingston OM8PCP31024F	59.7 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book NP750XDA Lite-On CL1-8D512	31.5 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Average of class Subnotebook (38.2 - 4852, n=58, last 2 years)	2970 MB/s +26%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	2543 (2501.69^min - 2543.01^max) MB/s +7%
Samsung Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-512GB	2427 (2291.53^min - 2426.79^max) MB/s +3%
LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	2366 (2295.96^min - 2365.59^max) MB/s
Average SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N (1780 - 2383, n=18)	2071 MB/s -12%
LG Gram 16 (2021) SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG	1730 (1725.12^min - 1730.26^max) MB/s -27%
Samsung Galaxy Book NP750XDA Lite-On CL1-8D512	1598 (1589.22^min - 1598.03^max) MB/s -32%
MSI Summit B15 A11M Kingston OM8PCP31024F	1338 (1271.9^min - 1337.82^max) MB/s -43%
seq write
Average of class Subnotebook (38.2 - 5344, n=58, last 2 years)	2941 MB/s +3%
LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	2854 (1876.32^min - 2854.01^max) MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-512GB	2666 (2341.4^min - 2666.23^max) MB/s -7%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	2612 (2518.68^min - 2611.79^max) MB/s -8%
LG Gram 16 (2021) SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG	2489 (1082.97^min - 2488.9^max) MB/s -13%
Average SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N (1886 - 2909, n=18)	2343 MB/s -18%
MSI Summit B15 A11M Kingston OM8PCP31024F	1683 (1662.23^min - 1683.16^max) MB/s -41%
Samsung Galaxy Book NP750XDA Lite-On CL1-8D512	205 (101.08^min - 204.9^max) MB/s -93%
seq q8 t1 read
Average of class Subnotebook (38.5 - 13544, n=58, last 2 years)	5300 MB/s +49%
Average SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N (3515 - 3607, n=18)	3565 MB/s 0%
LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	3563 (3257.3^min - 3563.48^max) MB/s
LG Gram 16 (2021) SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG	3445 (3030.59^min - 3444.78^max) MB/s -3%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	3434 (3081.26^min - 3433.72^max) MB/s -4%
Samsung Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-512GB	3380 (2831.16^min - 3379.51^max) MB/s -5%
MSI Summit B15 A11M Kingston OM8PCP31024F	2116 (71.37^min - 2116.2^max) MB/s -41%
Samsung Galaxy Book NP750XDA Lite-On CL1-8D512	1808 (1640.81^min - 1808.37^max) MB/s -49%
seq q8 t1 write
Average of class Subnotebook (38.2 - 9702, n=58, last 2 years)	4134 MB/s +34%
LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	3090 (2893.02^min - 3090.36^max) MB/s
Average SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N (2869 - 3098, n=18)	3014 MB/s -2%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	2718 (2592.86^min - 2718.14^max) MB/s -12%
Samsung Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-512GB	2705 (2648.65^min - 2705.37^max) MB/s -12%
LG Gram 16 (2021) SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG	2496 (2283.43^min - 2496.07^max) MB/s -19%
MSI Summit B15 A11M Kingston OM8PCP31024F	1685 (1661.78^min - 1685.06^max) MB/s -45%
Samsung Galaxy Book NP750XDA Lite-On CL1-8D512	229 (98.78^min - 229.05^max) MB/s -93%
4k q1 t1 read
LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	70.5 (69.35^min - 70.51^max) MB/s
Average of class Subnotebook (8.27 - 87.4, n=58, last 2 years)	61.4 MB/s -13%
Average SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N (32.6 - 70.5, n=18)	56.9 MB/s -19%
LG Gram 16 (2021) SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG	54.3 (54.16^min - 54.32^max) MB/s -23%
Samsung Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-512GB	53.7 (51.35^min - 53.67^max) MB/s -24%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	51.5 (50.84^min - 51.52^max) MB/s -27%
MSI Summit B15 A11M Kingston OM8PCP31024F	47.2 (46.12^min - 47.21^max) MB/s -33%
Samsung Galaxy Book NP750XDA Lite-On CL1-8D512	32.8 (31.23^min - 32.82^max) MB/s -53%
4k q1 t1 write
MSI Summit B15 A11M Kingston OM8PCP31024F	240 (239.18^min - 240.36^max) MB/s +26%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	223 (222.25^min - 223.21^max) MB/s +17%
LG Gram 16 (2021) SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG	208 (205.9^min - 208.09^max) MB/s +9%
Samsung Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-512GB	193.9 (192.41^min - 193.86^max) MB/s +2%
LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	190 (180.09^min - 189.84^max) MB/s
Average of class Subnotebook (12 - 360, n=58, last 2 years)	158.9 MB/s -16%
Average SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N (81.2 - 216, n=18)	153.8 MB/s -19%
Samsung Galaxy Book NP750XDA Lite-On CL1-8D512	121 (63.19^min - 121.28^max) MB/s -36%
4k q32 t16 read
LG Gram 16 (2021) SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG	2139 (1104.16^min - 2139.02^max) MB/s +9%
LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	1970 (1523.11^min - 1970.02^max) MB/s
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	1910 (1860.97^min - 1909.53^max) MB/s -3%
Samsung Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-512GB	1542 (1494.63^min - 1542.35^max) MB/s -22%
Average SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N (628 - 2217, n=18)	1337 MB/s -32%
Average of class Subnotebook (11.1 - 4286, n=58, last 2 years)	1259 MB/s -36%
MSI Summit B15 A11M Kingston OM8PCP31024F	582 (567.06^min - 581.94^max) MB/s -70%
Samsung Galaxy Book NP750XDA Lite-On CL1-8D512	321 (315.19^min - 320.83^max) MB/s -84%
4k q32 t16 write
MSI Summit B15 A11M Kingston OM8PCP31024F	1683 (1671.16^min - 1683.21^max) MB/s +171%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	1646 (694.72^min - 1646.39^max) MB/s +165%
LG Gram 16 (2021) SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG	1641 (1097.57^min - 1640.78^max) MB/s +164%
Samsung Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-512GB	1319 (1076.82^min - 1319.35^max) MB/s +112%
Average SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N (394 - 2341, n=18)	883 MB/s +42%
Average of class Subnotebook (14.2 - 4189, n=58, last 2 years)	872 MB/s +40%
LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	622 (587.02^min - 622.24^max) MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Book NP750XDA Lite-On CL1-8D512	192 (101.9^min - 192.25^max) MB/s -69%

AS SSD
Score Total
LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	4997 Points
LG Gram 16 (2021) SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG	4934 Points -1%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	4899 Points -2%
Average SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N (3615 - 6117, n=15)	4797 Points -4%
Average of class Subnotebook (515 - 8892, n=57, last 2 years)	4331 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-512GB	3266 Points -35%
MSI Summit B15 A11M Kingston OM8PCP31024F	2988 Points -40%
Samsung Galaxy Book NP750XDA Lite-On CL1-8D512	1726 Points -65%
Score Read
LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	1972 Points
LG Gram 16 (2021) SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG	1915 Points -3%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	1812 Points -8%
Average SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N (1221 - 2291, n=15)	1706 Points -13%
Average of class Subnotebook (246 - 3307, n=57, last 2 years)	1363 Points -31%
Samsung Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-512GB	1108 Points -44%
MSI Summit B15 A11M Kingston OM8PCP31024F	787 Points -60%
Samsung Galaxy Book NP750XDA Lite-On CL1-8D512	571 Points -71%
Score Write
Average of class Subnotebook (153 - 4469, n=57, last 2 years)	2330 Points +16%
Average SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N (1638 - 2660, n=15)	2258 Points +13%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	2186 Points +9%
LG Gram 16 (2021) SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG	2060 Points +3%
LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	2001 Points
MSI Summit B15 A11M Kingston OM8PCP31024F	1795 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-512GB	1611 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy Book NP750XDA Lite-On CL1-8D512	904 Points -55%
Seq Read
Average of class Subnotebook (448 - 8075, n=57, last 2 years)	4079 MB/s +54%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	2960 MB/s +12%
Samsung Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-512GB	2901 MB/s +10%
Average SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N (2635 - 3133, n=15)	2839 MB/s +7%
LG Gram 16 (2021) SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG	2808 MB/s +6%
LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	2641 MB/s
MSI Summit B15 A11M Kingston OM8PCP31024F	1782 MB/s -33%
Samsung Galaxy Book NP750XDA Lite-On CL1-8D512	1780 MB/s -33%
Seq Write
LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	2795 MB/s
Average of class Subnotebook (99 - 5120, n=57, last 2 years)	2633 MB/s -6%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	2371 MB/s -15%
LG Gram 16 (2021) SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG	2345 MB/s -16%
Samsung Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-512GB	2289 MB/s -18%
Average SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N (1243 - 2969, n=15)	1917 MB/s -31%
MSI Summit B15 A11M Kingston OM8PCP31024F	1588 MB/s -43%
Samsung Galaxy Book NP750XDA Lite-On CL1-8D512	843 MB/s -70%
4K Read
LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	61.6 MB/s
Average of class Subnotebook (19.8 - 96.2, n=57, last 2 years)	58.6 MB/s -5%
Average SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N (28.8 - 66.9, n=15)	53 MB/s -14%
LG Gram 16 (2021) SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG	50.2 MB/s -19%
Samsung Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-512GB	46.57 MB/s -24%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	46.48 MB/s -25%
MSI Summit B15 A11M Kingston OM8PCP31024F	44.99 MB/s -27%
Samsung Galaxy Book NP750XDA Lite-On CL1-8D512	24.25 MB/s -61%
4K Write
MSI Summit B15 A11M Kingston OM8PCP31024F	192.2 MB/s +41%
Average of class Subnotebook (37.4 - 256, n=57, last 2 years)	176.8 MB/s +30%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	143.6 MB/s +5%
LG Gram 16 (2021) SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG	138.6 MB/s +2%
Samsung Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-512GB	137.1 MB/s +1%
LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	136.2 MB/s
Average SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N (59 - 184.8, n=15)	127.3 MB/s -7%
Samsung Galaxy Book NP750XDA Lite-On CL1-8D512	102.2 MB/s -25%
4K-64 Read
LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	1645 MB/s
LG Gram 16 (2021) SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG	1584 MB/s -4%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	1470 MB/s -11%
Average SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N (873 - 1923, n=15)	1369 MB/s -17%
Average of class Subnotebook (181.8 - 2682, n=57, last 2 years)	897 MB/s -45%
Samsung Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-512GB	772 MB/s -53%
MSI Summit B15 A11M Kingston OM8PCP31024F	564 MB/s -66%
Samsung Galaxy Book NP750XDA Lite-On CL1-8D512	369 MB/s -78%
4K-64 Write
Average SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N (1342 - 2216, n=15)	1939 MB/s +22%
Average of class Subnotebook (105.9 - 3905, n=57, last 2 years)	1886 MB/s +19%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	1806 MB/s +14%
LG Gram 16 (2021) SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG	1687 MB/s +6%
LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	1585 MB/s
MSI Summit B15 A11M Kingston OM8PCP31024F	1444 MB/s -9%
Samsung Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-512GB	1245 MB/s -21%
Samsung Galaxy Book NP750XDA Lite-On CL1-8D512	717 MB/s -55%
Access Time Read
Samsung Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-512GB	0.142 ms * -238%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	0.088 ms * -110%
MSI Summit B15 A11M Kingston OM8PCP31024F	0.077 ms * -83%
Samsung Galaxy Book NP750XDA Lite-On CL1-8D512	0.076 ms * -81%
Average of class Subnotebook (0.02 - 0.167, n=57, last 2 years)	0.05558 ms * -32%
Average SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N (0.028 - 0.093, n=15)	0.0468 ms * -11%
LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	0.042 ms *
LG Gram 16 (2021) SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG	0.035 ms * +17%
Access Time Write
Samsung Galaxy Book NP750XDA Lite-On CL1-8D512	0.124 ms * -328%
Average of class Subnotebook (0.017 - 0.352, n=57, last 2 years)	0.07407 ms * -155%
MSI Summit B15 A11M Kingston OM8PCP31024F	0.059 ms * -103%
Average SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N (0.028 - 0.109, n=15)	0.0532 ms * -83%
LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	0.029 ms *
Samsung Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-512GB	0.028 ms * +3%
LG Gram 16 (2021) SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG	0.028 ms * +3%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	0.026 ms * +10%

* ... smaller is better

Continuous read speed: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N: Ø3234 (2731.33-3558.66)

图形卡

芯片 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EUs)在合成基准测试中取得了正常的结果。没有出现我们在CPU基准测试中看到的节流现象。然而，在真正的游戏中，iGPU的节流，甚至在低设置下。在这里，Iris Xe Graphics G7（96EUs）的表现比其他设备差30-45%。

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Subnotebook	100 pt
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7	70.6 pt
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	65 pt
LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7	64.7 pt
MSI Summit B15 A11M Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7	63.3 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book NP750XDA Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1135G7	61.9 pt
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1135G7	51.3 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver NVIDIA GeForce MX250, Intel Core i7-10510U	45.7 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Subnotebook (968 - 16296, n=55, last 2 years)	9537 Points +51%
MSI Summit B15 A11M Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7	6550 Points +4%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (2867 - 7676, n=202)	6353 Points +1%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7	6305 Points 0%
LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7	6303 Points
Samsung Galaxy Book NP750XDA Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1135G7	6072 Points -4%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1135G7	5517 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver NVIDIA GeForce MX250, Intel Core i7-10510U	4352 Points -31%

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Subnotebook (832 - 11887, n=59, last 2 years)	6977 Points +35%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7	5654 Points +9%
LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7	5169 Points
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (2286 - 6482, n=215)	4920 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy Book NP750XDA Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1135G7	4704 Points -9%
MSI Summit B15 A11M Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7	4644 Points -10%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1135G7	3566 Points -31%
Samsung Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver NVIDIA GeForce MX250, Intel Core i7-10510U	3485 Points -33%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Subnotebook (804 - 4501, n=60, last 2 years)	2577 Points +86%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7	1664 Points +20%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (707 - 1871, n=212)	1495 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy Book NP750XDA Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1135G7	1408 Points +2%
MSI Summit B15 A11M Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7	1406 Points +1%
LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7	1386 Points
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1135G7	1159 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver NVIDIA GeForce MX250, Intel Core i7-10510U	1071 Points -23%

3DMark 11 Performance		5724 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		4084 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		1496 points
Help

... in comparison

游戏性能

Gram 15不能处理游戏。其iGPU的性能比预期的要慢20-180%。在对CPU要求较高的游戏中，性能打击尤其明显。在《Witcher 3 》中，Gram 15在低设置下平均只能达到29 FPS。

The Witcher 3
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing
Average of class Subnotebook (48 - 187, n=47, last 2 years)	118.2 fps +309%
MSI Summit B15 A11M Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	95.3 (87^min) fps +230%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	84.4 (4.44^min, 14^P0.1, 35.5^P1) fps +192%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (28.9 - 117.2, n=186)	84 fps +191%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	70 fps +142%
Samsung Galaxy Book NP750XDA Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	65 fps +125%
Samsung Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250	55.4 fps +92%
LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	28.9 fps
1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing
Average of class Subnotebook (33 - 118, n=35, last 2 years)	70.5 fps +143%
MSI Summit B15 A11M Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	56.3 (50^min) fps +94%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (21.4 - 77.8, n=184)	53.6 fps +85%
Samsung Galaxy Book NP750XDA Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	51.2 fps +77%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	47.7 (3.04^min, 19.1^P0.1, 27.9^P1) fps +64%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	43 fps +48%
Samsung Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250	30 fps +3%
LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	29 fps

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 high (2/3)
Average of class Subnotebook (14.8 - 112.6, n=63, last 2 years)	68 fps +70%
Samsung Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250	64 (58^min) fps +60%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (23.2 - 88.1, n=215)	54.2 fps +36%
Samsung Galaxy Book NP750XDA Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	47.9 (23.2^min) fps +20%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	47.1 (8.8^min) fps +18%
MSI Summit B15 A11M Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	45.4 (31.7^min) fps +14%
LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	39.9 (32.1^min) fps
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	35.7 (26.2^min) fps -11%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1280x720 Lite Quality
Average of class Subnotebook (29.9 - 111.6, n=61, last 2 years)	62 fps +172%
Samsung Galaxy Book NP750XDA Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	39.7 fps +74%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (14.9 - 56.5, n=183)	39.4 fps +73%
MSI Summit B15 A11M Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	39.1 fps +71%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	37.4 fps +64%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	30.8 fps +35%
LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	22.8 fps

X-Plane 11.11 - 1280x720 low (fps_test=1)
Samsung Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250	60.1 fps +79%
MSI Summit B15 A11M Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	59.3 fps +77%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	51.7 fps +54%
Average of class Subnotebook (25.9 - 144.7, n=62, last 2 years)	50.3 fps +50%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	42.6 fps +27%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (13.4 - 88.4, n=212)	41.5 fps +24%
LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	33.5 fps
Samsung Galaxy Book NP750XDA Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	25.2 fps -25%

Far Cry 5 - 1280x720 Low Preset AA:T
Average of class Subnotebook (37 - 132, n=45, last 2 years)	68.6 fps +186%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	55 (44^min) fps +129%
Samsung Galaxy Book NP750XDA Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	51 fps +113%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (23 - 75, n=92)	46.5 fps +94%
Samsung Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250	45 fps +88%
LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	24 (17^min) fps

Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 medium AA:medium AF:4
Average of class Subnotebook (29.4 - 96.5, n=61, last 2 years)	58.9 fps +131%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	41.2 (22.1^min, 24.2^P1) fps +62%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (18.2 - 51.4, n=166)	36.5 fps +43%
Samsung Galaxy Book NP750XDA Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	34.7 (9.2^min, 17.4^P1) fps +36%
LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	25.5 (5.2^min, 10.6^P1) fps
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	24.6 (5.5^min, 6.32^P1) fps -4%

Farming Simulator 22
1280x720 Low Preset
LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	105 fps
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (81 - 112, n=11)	100.5 fps -4%
1920x1080 Medium Preset
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (20 - 51, n=10)	42.1 fps +111%
LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	20 fps

GTA V
1366x768 Normal/Off AF:4x
Average of class Subnotebook (63.4 - 172.6, n=57, last 2 years)	119.1 fps +159%
Samsung Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250	96.7 fps +110%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	84.8 (6.27^min, 40^P1) fps +84%
Samsung Galaxy Book NP750XDA Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	84.3 (0.4206^min, 47.6^P1) fps +83%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (24.1 - 149.3, n=165)	83.1 fps +81%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	59.9 (12.4^min, 37^P1) fps +30%
LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	46 fps
1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x
Average of class Subnotebook (13.8 - 95.3, n=57, last 2 years)	45.1 fps +222%
Samsung Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250	38.4 fps +174%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	32.7 (9.72^min, 23.3^P1) fps +134%
Samsung Galaxy Book NP750XDA Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	28.2 (2.85^min, 16.7^P1) fps +101%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (9.39 - 51.6, n=157)	22.8 fps +63%
Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	15.4 (4.94^min, 11.8^P1) fps +10%
LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	14 fps

Witcher 3 展示了CPU和GPU是如何争夺非常有限的功率预算的。最后，CPU占了上风，但它只消耗了10到20瓦，并且只在700兆赫下运行。这与CPU的全部潜力相差甚远。简而言之，集成GPU在游戏时非常吃力。英特尔的Iris Xe GPU即使在最好的情况下也不是一个好的执行者，但在这里它的表现特别差。

Witcher 3 Ultra：CPU的时钟处于低水平，GPU的时钟处于中等水平

	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD	4K
GTA V (2015)	60	46	14
The Witcher 3 (2015)	28.9	29	19
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	113.7	73.4	39.9	35.6		15.5
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	22.8	14.2	9.8		7.09
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	33.5	22.8	21.2
Far Cry 5 (2018)	24	14
Strange Brigade (2018)	80.8	25.5	18.9	15.7
Farming Simulator 22 (2021)	105	20

排放。Gram 15保持安静和凉爽

系统噪音

Gram 15是一台安静的笔记本电脑。风扇很少启动，而风扇的噪音从未超过32 dB(A)。笔记本保持非常安静，因为它在连续负载下会节流。在这里，LG选择了低噪音水平而不是性能。笔记本 Galaxy Book Ion Aura的噪音略大，但它在负载下没有节流。不过，在空闲时，两款笔记本都是绝对安静的。

Noise Level

Idle		25 / 25 / 26.7 dB(A)
Load		32.2 / 32.4 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25 dB(A)

	LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	LG Gram 16 (2021) Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG	Samsung Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver GeForce MX250, i7-10510U, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-512GB	Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	MSI Summit B15 A11M Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Kingston OM8PCP31024F	Samsung Galaxy Book NP750XDA Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Lite-On CL1-8D512
Noise		-0%	-6%	-1%	-10%	-14%
off / environment *	25	26 -4%	24.9 -0%	24.6 2%	25.2 -1%	26 -4%
Idle Minimum *	25	26 -4%	24.9 -0%	24.6 2%	26.4 -6%	26 -4%
Idle Average *	25	26 -4%	24.9 -0%	24.6 2%	26.4 -6%	26 -4%
Idle Maximum *	26.7	26 3%	24.9 7%	24.6 8%	26.4 1%	26 3%
Load Average *	32.2	30.8 4%	39 -21%	33.9 -5%	26.8 17%	43.3 -34%
Load Maximum *	32.4	31.1 4%	39.2 -21%	36.5 -13%	52.6 -62%	45.7 -41%
Witcher 3 ultra *			38.9	33.9	28

* ... smaller is better

温度

单一的风扇和小的热管可能是Gram 15在负载下节流的原因。但这是每个LG Gram笔记本电脑的情况。在任何情况下，这样的铜热管通常重约100克（约0.22磅）。

闲置时，目前的英特尔芯片很难被打败。在这里，电力消耗，在大多数情况下，从2.9W到8.7W不等。这就是为什么笔记本电脑感觉很酷。在负载情况下，情况看起来完全不同，但即使在这里，表面温度也不会很严重（在键盘的上部约为40℃/104°F）。底部从未变热（甚至比顶部更凉）。我们看到，LG采用了适度的冷却解决方案。然而，为了防止笔记本过热和产生大量噪音，LG决定设置低功率限制。对于一个超移动设备来说，这并不是一个不合理的妥协。

Max. Load

Idle


24.5 °C	25.4 °C	25.1 °C
24.7 °C	24.7 °C	24.1 °C
23.5 °C	23.7 °C	23.1 °C

Maximum: 25.4 °C
Average: 24.3 °C


24.4 °C	24.9 °C	24 °C
23.7 °C	23.9 °C	24.5 °C
24.1 °C	24.2 °C	23.8 °C

Maximum: 24.9 °C
Average: 24.2 °C

Power Supply (max.) 31.5 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.2 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.9 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.3 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.4 °C / 81.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (+0.9 °C / 1.6 F).

	LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	Samsung Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250	Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	MSI Summit B15 A11M Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	Samsung Galaxy Book NP750XDA Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
Heat		-6%	-11%	2%	-12%	-11%
Maximum Upper Side *	42.9	46.9 -9%	50.1 -17%	35.4 17%	42.8 -0%	46.5 -8%
Maximum Bottom *	39.4	45.1 -14%	50.2 -27%	40.8 -4%	52.2 -32%	44.8 -14%
Idle Upper Side *	25.4	26.4 -4%	24.8 2%	25.4 -0%	26 -2%	27.8 -9%
Idle Bottom *	24.9	24.1 3%	25.5 -2%	26 -4%	28.2 -13%	28.3 -14%

* ... smaller is better

压力测试

在Prime95和Furmark的帮助下进行的压力测试中，我们记录了SoC的温度、时钟和功率消耗。短暂的55W峰值是值得注意的。在这里，我们看到CPU温度峰值为85℃（185°F），CPU时钟从3.5GHz降至1.6GHz。因为在压力测试期间，系统始终处于负载状态，内部温度保持在80°C（176°F）以上，直到CPU时钟速率下降到1.1GHz。在这之后，CPU温度下降到70 °C（158 °F）以下。但随后，时钟频率又开始上升，直到核心温度达到78℃（172.4°F），时钟速度再次下降。这个周期一再重复，也就是说，只要核心温度降到70℃（158°F）以下，CPU频率就开始上升。然而，只要CPU温度达到78℃（172.4°F），工作频率就会下降。

	CPU时钟（GHz）	GPU时钟（MHz）	CPU平均温度（°C）	GPU平均温度（°C）
系统空闲	3,2	100	37	41
Prime95压力	2,2	100	72	80
Prime95 + FurMark 压力	1,33	695	75	74
Witcher 3 Stress	1,9	903	75	71

发言人

两个扬声器位于腕托下方（靠近两侧）。当笔记本电脑放置在一个均匀、坚固的表面上时，扬声器的性能最好，从这个表面上可以很容易地反射声音。小驱动器的设计已经改变，但大的腔体仍然保留。

我们并没有期待有什么奇迹。笔记本电脑的扬声器听起来很尖锐，低音也非常小。这里没有任何一代的改进。值得注意的是。即使扬声器格栅被覆盖，也没有真正的音量损失，只有声音特征发生了一些变化。这是由于笔记本内部的谐振室造成的。与其他15英寸笔记本电脑相比，音量在一个合适的水平上。声音在全音量时不会变得失真。

Gram 15配备了讯连科技的音频总监7。它不是最强大的音频编辑程序，但它至少是个东西。双麦克风阵列即使在离设备0.5到2米的地方也能产生无噪音的录音。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 39% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (66.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能源管理。Gram笔记本电脑的电池寿命为14小时

能源消耗

与前代产品相比，耗电量没有明显变化。LG Gram 15在空闲时的功耗为2.9至11.5瓦。在负载情况下，系统的功耗为29W，比基于Ice Lake 的前代产品低2W。鉴于在我们的压力测试中，耗电量仅在64W徘徊了几秒钟，65W的电源适配器应该不难为设备提供足够的能量。

我们用外部显示器和内置显示器来测量系统功耗。在这里，即使在峰值测量中也没有太大的差别。在压力测试的前三分钟后，功耗从60瓦下降到35-25瓦。其他笔记本电脑没有节流这么多。例如，配备MX250的三星Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver在我们的压力测试中成功保持了高水平的性能。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.35 / 0.4 Watt
Idle	2.9 / 8.7 / 11.5 Watt
Load	29.2 / 63.6 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N, IPS 99% sRGB, 1920x1080, 15.6"	LG Gram 16 (2021) i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	Samsung Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver i7-10510U, GeForce MX250, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-512GB, QLED, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	MSI Summit B15 A11M i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Kingston OM8PCP31024F, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	Average of class Subnotebook
Power Consumption		-4%	-16%	-3%	-14%	-27%	-17%
Idle Minimum *	2.9	3.8 -31%	2.9 -0%	3.4 -17%	4.2 -45%	5.34 ?(2.2 - 46.5, n=193) -84%	4.43 ?(1.3 - 9.3, n=60, last 2 years) -53%
Idle Average *	8.7	9 -3%	7 20%	7.7 11%	7.7 11%	8.55 ?(3.8 - 63, n=193) 2%	7.58 ?(2.5 - 16, n=60, last 2 years) 13%
Idle Maximum *	11.5	11.3 2%	9.9 14%	8.3 28%	8.4 27%	10.8 ?(5.8 - 68.9, n=193) 6%	9.43 ?(4.1 - 16.8, n=60, last 2 years) 18%
Load Average *	29.2	35.2 -21%	53 -82%	32 -10%	37.8 -29%	45.3 ?(12.5 - 87.3, n=193) -55%	45.8 ?(19.1 - 78.6, n=58, last 2 years) -57%
Witcher 3 ultra *	26.4		39.3 -49%	33.9 -28%	36.6 -39%
Load Maximum *	63.6	43.5 32%	64 -1%	65.2 -3%	67.5 -6%	67.5 ?(30.1 - 123.3, n=193) -6%	68.7 ?(24.2 - 121.2, n=60, last 2 years) -8%

* ... smaller is better

Power Draw: The Witcher 3 / stress test

LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø26.4 (22.9-32.4)

Samsung Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver i7-10510U, GeForce MX250; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø39.3 (37-59.5)

Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø33.9 (32.8-45.6)

LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø34.9 (24.5-63.7)

Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø46.5 (36.1-65.4)

Power draw with the external Monitor: R15 loop / Furmark / stress test

LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø32.3 (22.8-63.5)

Samsung Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver i7-10510U, GeForce MX250; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø37 (20.8-45.5)

Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø36.4 (25.8-65)

MSI Summit B15 A11M i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø64.4 (64.1-64.8)

LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø36.5 (30.1-60.2)

Samsung Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver i7-10510U, GeForce MX250; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø38.4 (30.1-50.6)

Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø51.1 (8.23-59.7)

LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø29.2 (18.9-43.6)

Samsung Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver i7-10510U, GeForce MX250; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø41.2 (38.8-45.5)

Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø30.9 (28-46.7)

电池寿命

LG Gram 15配备了80瓦时的大电池，这是值得注意的，因为较小的电池通常重量较轻。在这里，LG使用了能量密度很高的电池。顺便说一下，所有LG Grams都使用这种电池，甚至17英寸的也是如此。

在我们的Wi-Fi测试中，我们将亮度设置为150cd/m²并启用通信模块，Gram 15持续了近14个小时（比Gram 16少两个小时）。竞争对手的笔记本没有机会对抗Gram 15，因为它们配备的电池较小。

LG Grams持续如此之久的另一个原因是节流。值得再次提及的是，CPU的功耗在负载下在10至20瓦之间波动。

在闲置电池测试中，通信模块被禁用，亮度降低到22cd/m²，笔记本电脑持续了令人印象深刻的26小时。然而，这项测试与日常使用的关系不大。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		26h 00min
WiFi Websurfing		13h 41min
Load (maximum brightness)		3h 59min

	LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 80 Wh	LG Gram 16 (2021) i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 80 Wh	Samsung Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver i7-10510U, GeForce MX250, 70 Wh	Honor MagicBook 15 i5 1135G7 i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 42 Wh	MSI Summit B15 A11M i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 52 Wh	Samsung Galaxy Book NP750XDA i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 54 Wh	Average of class Subnotebook
Battery Runtime		11%	-44%	-45%	-52%	-32%	-15%
Reader / Idle	1560	1713 10%	967 -38%		1105 -29%	1365 -12%	1808 ?(581 - 3407, n=11, last 2 years) 16%
WiFi v1.3	821	943 15%	412 -50%	451 -45%	397 -52%	607 -26%	729 ?(389 - 1585, n=61, last 2 years) -11%
Load	239	258 8%	133 -44%		58 -76%	97 -59%	116.5 ?(57 - 197, n=47, last 2 years) -51%
H.264		1204	647				917 ?(527 - 1298, n=26, last 2 years)

Pros

+ 镁合金外壳

+ 重量极轻

+ 包括Thunderbolt 4在内的大量端口选择

+ 足够明亮的屏幕

+ 额外的M.2插槽

+ 没有很多噪音，没有很多热量

+ 极好的电池寿命

Cons

- 屏幕表面反射率很高

- 低对比度

- 焊接的、不可更换的、不可扩展的内存

- 负载下会出现严重的节流现象

- 如预期的那样，游戏性能差

结论。Gram 15提供了很好的电池寿命，但性能不高

2021年的Gram 15在性能上比2020年的Gram 15有了相当大的提高，后者是基于Ice Lake CPU。此外，2021年的模型得到了视觉上的重新设计。低重量仍然是该笔记本电脑的主要特点。它比所有其他竞争的15英寸笔记本都要轻，而且还提供出色的电池寿命（我们在这里说的是14小时）。

LG未能充分释放酷睿i7处理器的潜力。在这种特殊情况下，我们看到40%的性能不足。尽管如此，由于快速的固态硬盘和40W的突发TDP，系统感觉很灵敏。Gram 15并不适合重度、连续的负载，但它在所有其他情况下运行良好。

非常低的重量是LG Gram 15的与众不同之处。为了启动，LG的笔记本电脑还提供了出色的电池运行时间（14小时）。

我们没有处理过酷睿i5版本的Gram 15，但我们估计它的性能应该不会比酷睿i7模型差很多，这就是为什么我们建议获得酷睿i5变体。它提供的存储空间较少，但内部存储可以通过安装额外的固态硬盘轻松扩展。该设备内部有一个空的M.2-2280插槽。

对那些重量不是很重要的人来说，可以获得三星Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver它的价格要低50%，重量只多200克（约0.44磅）。然而，使用Galaxy Book Ion，你只能得到一半的电池寿命（7小时）。

价格和可用性

配备酷睿i5-1135G7和512GB固态硬盘的LG Gram 15可以在亚马逊上购买。售价1249.99美元。

LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G - 01/24/2022 v7 ^(old)
Sebastian Jentsch

Chassis

73 / 98 → 74%

Keyboard

80%

Pointing Device

83%

Connectivity

62 / 75 → 83%

Weight

74 / 20-75 → 98%

Battery

90%

Display

81%

Games Performance

59 / 78 → 76%

Application Performance

85 / 85 → 100%

Temperature

93%

Noise

96%

Audio

68 / 91 → 75%

Camera

24 / 85 → 28%

Average

75%

85%

Subnotebook - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Stanislav Kokhanyuk - Translator - 81 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2021

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 470341 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > LG Gram 15Z90P评论：1.1公斤（约2.4磅）的15英寸笔记本电脑

Sebastian Jentsch, 2022-01-28 (Update: 2022-01-28)

Likely Competitors

案例："僵硬 "并不能说明LG笔记本电脑的情况

Size Comparison

连接性

SD卡阅读器

沟通

网络摄像机

安全问题

辅料

维护

担保

输入设备。带数字键盘的Gram 15

键盘

触摸板

显示屏。LG面板具有高反射率的表面

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

性能。在短期工作负荷中表现良好

系统设置

处理器

Cinebench R15 multi-core loop

系统性能

DPC延迟

存储设备

Continuous read speed: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

图形卡

游戏性能

排放。Gram 15保持安静和凉爽

系统噪音

温度

压力测试

发言人

LG Gram 15Z90P-G.AA89G audio analysis

Samsung Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver audio analysis

能源管理。Gram笔记本电脑的电池寿命为14小时

能源消耗

Power Draw: The Witcher 3 / stress test

Power draw with the external Monitor: R15 loop / Furmark / stress test

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

结论。Gram 15提供了很好的电池寿命，但性能不高

价格和可用性

More articles related to this device

Price comparison