LG Gram 17评测--超轻的17英寸笔记本电脑,配备适度的dGPU
LG Gram。一个拥有强大处理器的极轻笔记本电脑的代名词,在这种情况下,甚至还有一个专门的GPU。然而,在1,407克时,这款笔记本电脑只比它的同类产品稍重一些。 同类产品这款笔记本没有配备DGPU。由于 NvidiaGeForce RTX 2050和 英特尔酷睿i7-1260P的支持,高水平的性能唾手可得--至少在纸面上是这样。在实践中,硬件不得不屈从于18毫米薄的笔记本电脑提供的有限空间。实际上,LG已经设法通过有效的冷却来控制CPU和GPU的废热,但也设定了相对低的TDP值。
除了其他LG Gram笔记本电脑,我们的数据库中没有其他17英寸设备像这家韩国制造商的轻量级产品一样纤细。因此,我们正在使用相当小的设备,如 三星Galaxy Book 15或联想Yoga Slim 7i Pro X作为比较。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
86.4 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2023 | LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G i7-1260P, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | 1.4 kg | 17.8 mm | 17.00" | 2560x1600 | |
87.7 % v7 (old) | 12 / 2022 | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | 1.5 kg | 18 mm | 14.50" | 3072x1920 | |
79.8 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2022 | Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 i7-1260P, A350M | 1.6 kg | 15 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
87.3 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2022 | LG Gram 17 (2022) i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.4 kg | 17.7 mm | 17.00" | 2560x1600 | |
86.7 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2021 | LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.4 kg | 17.8 mm | 17.00" | 2560x1600 | |
87.7 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2022 | Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | 1.9 kg | 18 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
85.7 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2022 | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 R5 6600HS, Radeon 660M | 1.9 kg | 18.4 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳 - 灵活的镁合金
Gram 17非常纤细,这是LG Gram系列的典型特征。凭借其薄薄的边框,17英寸的笔记本电脑几乎不比其他15.6至16英寸的设备大。自2021年以来,该笔记本电脑的镁合金外壳几乎没有变化。 LG Gram 17Z90P.只有颜色的选择似乎有所扩大。同时,黑色的LG Gram 17也是可用的。在笔记本电脑的底部,有时不实用的橡胶脚已被一个几乎占据设备全部宽度的支架所取代。至少这消除了键盘被压得太紧时的弯曲。然而,对于我们的口味来说,这个箱子还是有点太灵活了,感觉非常脆弱。偶尔,笔记本电脑在扭动时发出吱吱声,尽管表面看起来很平整,而且箱子里没有明显的缝隙。
功能 - LG Gram 17没有提供新的功能
在过去的两年里,关于端口的配置没有任何变化。LG Gram 17通过两个功能齐全的USB-C端口提供均衡的连接。除此以外,还有Thunderbolt、PowerDelivery和Displayport。
SD卡阅读器
LG Gram 17的microSD读卡器速度非常快,很少有设备能提供明显高于Angelbird AV Pro microSD的传输速度。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Average of class Multimedia (18.4 - 201, n=60, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
LG Gram 17 (2022) (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Average of class Multimedia (25.8 - 266, n=59, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
LG Gram 17 (2022) (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) |
沟通
LG Gram的英特尔AX 211无线局域网模块确保了WiFi 6E。凭借最新的WiFi标准,两个方向的传输速度都高于平均水平,与其他设备相比也是如此。
Networking | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Average of class Multimedia | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Networking | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Average of class Multimedia | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
网络摄像头
与以前的机型相比,LG Gram 17 2022的网络摄像头得到了改进。它现在提供了更高的全高清分辨率,并通过Windows Hello进行面部识别。该摄像头不是特别明亮,需要良好的照明才能产生合理清晰的图像。然而,该网络摄像头足以满足基本的视频通话。
安全问题
具有Windows Hello功能的网络摄像头是新的。作为回报,LG Gram的指纹传感器已被放弃。Kensington锁槽负责物理安全,除此之外,英特尔酷睿i7-1260P提供TPM 2.0和SecureBoot等安全功能。
辅料
开箱后,LG只提供了一个USB-C电源适配器以及典型的文件,并且在包装上基本上没有使用塑料。只有电源适配器被装在一个袋子里,保护膜覆盖了显示器的盖子。由于预制的打孔,部分包装可以被升级为万年历和铅笔盒。
维护
不幸的是,LG在维护方面没有取得任何进展。该设备的所有螺丝都被粘上的脚或塑料盖覆盖。在内部,该笔记本只有几个可更换的模块。同样,WiFi模块和RAM也是焊接的。不过,有一个免费的M.2插槽可供额外的SSD使用。
担保
在欧洲,LG提供24个月的制造商保修。此外,LG不提供延长保修期或保险。
输入设备--由于新的支架而更加稳定
与前一型号相比,只对键盘进行了轻微的改动。从机械角度来看,这两款设备是相同的。字母缩小了一点,意味着按键不再看起来过大。在机械方面,键盘和以前一样。有形的压力点与短键程相得益彰,确保这款纤薄的笔记本电脑能够愉快地打字。触摸板和键盘得益于新的内置支架。底座的弯曲度更小,而且在对键盘施加压力时也有更小的阻力。当对掌托施加越来越大的压力时,触摸板不再那么容易被意外地触发。当放置在用户的腿上时,意外的点击仍会发生。
显示屏--最终采用哑光
LG采用了2560 x 1600像素、16:10的显示屏,比其前代产品光线更均匀。 前代产品.因此,该显示屏的平均亮度为358cd/m²。与之相比 之前的型号屏的对比度也略有提高,最大的改进是采用了哑光的显示表面。这为原本就很好的显示屏增加了价值。缺乏反射对显示器的可读性有积极影响。这LG Gram 17Z90Q-G.AA56G没有dGPU也从同样的变化中受益。
|
Brightness Distribution: 84 %
Center on Battery: 341 cd/m²
Contrast: 1348:1 (Black: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.52 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1.43
ΔE Greyscale 4.27 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
82.98% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.66% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
92.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.3
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G LG Display LP170WQ1-SPF2, IPS, 2560x1600, 17" | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE MNE507ZA1-1, IPS, 3072x1920, 14.5" | Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 NE156FHM-NS0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G IPS, 2560x1600, 17" | Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q Samsung ATNA56YX03-0, OLED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 AUO B160QAN02.H, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -18% | -36% | 1% | -4% | -17% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 92.2 | 65.7 -29% | 49.6 -46% | 93 1% | 79.3 -14% | 65 -30% |
sRGB Coverage | 98.66 | 92.1 -7% | 74.8 -24% | 98.8 0% | 95.6 -3% | 98 -1% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 82.98 | 67.7 -18% | 51.3 -38% | 83.9 1% | 87.3 5% | 67.2 -19% |
Response Times | -71% | -78% | -91% | 86% | 39% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 22 ? | 35 ? -59% | 32.3 ? -47% | 47 ? -114% | 2.1 ? 90% | 14.1 ? 36% |
Response Time Black / White * | 12 ? | 22 ? -83% | 25 ? -108% | 20 ? -67% | 2.3 ? 81% | 7.1 ? 41% |
PWM Frequency | 60.2 | |||||
Screen | 37% | -45% | -7% | 20% | 15% | |
Brightness middle | 391 | 430 10% | 337 -14% | 404 3% | 342.9 -12% | 415 6% |
Brightness | 358 | 408 14% | 325 -9% | 323 -10% | 346 -3% | 409 14% |
Brightness Distribution | 84 | 85 1% | 89 6% | 73 -13% | 98 17% | 91 8% |
Black Level * | 0.29 | 0.29 -0% | 0.4 -38% | 0.425 -47% | 0.32 -10% | |
Contrast | 1348 | 1483 10% | 843 -37% | 951 -29% | 1297 -4% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.52 | 0.7 80% | 4.7 -34% | 3.46 2% | 2.42 31% | 1.92 45% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.06 | 1.3 79% | 15.7 -159% | 5.23 14% | 4.05 33% | 5.71 6% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.43 | 0.4 72% | 2.8 -96% | 0.58 59% | ||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.27 | 1.3 70% | 5.4 -26% | 3.12 27% | 2.1 51% | 3.7 13% |
Gamma | 2.3 96% | 2.22 99% | 2.07 106% | 2.46 89% | 2.21 100% | 2.272 97% |
CCT | 7203 90% | 6526 100% | 7727 84% | 7114 91% | 6364 102% | 7132 91% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -17% /
10% | -53% /
-48% | -32% /
-18% | 34% /
25% | 12% /
12% |
* ... smaller is better
LG Gram 17几乎完全覆盖了DisplayP3和sRGB色彩空间。只有在Adobe RGB色彩空间中,笔记本电脑的覆盖率低于90%。由于这个原因,LG Gram 17适合用于视频和照片编辑。
开箱后,LG Gram 17提供了良好的色彩再现。使用我们自己的ICC配置文件(下载可在信息框中找到),颜色偏差远远低于所需的ΔΕ3,这里的平均值为ΔΕ1.42。在显示器的出厂配置中,可以看到一个轻微的蓝色色调。然而,这在测量结果中更明显,而不是用肉眼看。在ICC配置文件的帮助下,这可以完全消除。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
12 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2 ms rise | |
↘ 10 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1 ms rise | |
↘ 21 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 30 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
由于显示屏几乎不反射入射光线,在户外使用应该没有问题。由于出色的视角稳定性,显示屏在任何位置都清晰可见。
性能 - i7和RTX 2050,低TDP
新的LG Gram 17Z90Q有多种配置。买家可以选择一个英特尔酷睿i5-1240P或英特尔酷睿i7-1260P与16或32GB的内存,分别。的NvidiaGeForce RTX RTX 2050, 英特尔酷睿i7和32GB内存的评测设备因此可以被看作是LG Gram的顶级型号。阅读我们的 LG Gram 17Z90Q-G.AA56G来了解英特尔酷睿i5-1240P和16GB内存版本提供的性能。
性能设置和测试条件
LG Gram的性能主要可以通过使用LG智能助理应用程序进行定制。这款笔记本电脑有三个性能级别,名为 "冷却模式",其范围从 "低 "到 "正常",一直到 "高"。
在所有三种模式下,HWinfo显示处理器的PL2为42瓦。然而,我们发现,使用低冷却模式并没有达到这个数字。在较长的时间内,CPU可以在12瓦特的情况下运行。如果你想使用安静设置来使用图形要求高的应用程序,等待你的将是失望。在大约两分钟的负载后,RTX 2050的性能下降得很厉害,以至于许多应用程序直接崩溃。这也显示在短期压力测试后的日志中。
正常 "冷却模式允许酷睿i7在25瓦的情况下长时间运行,"高 "冷却模式允许28瓦。如果显卡同时处于负载状态,这些数值就会缩减。日志显示 "高 "冷却模式下为15瓦,"正常 "模式下为10瓦。在更长的时间内,RTX 2050可以分别以31瓦和17瓦的速度运行。除了功率测量之外,所有的基准测试都是使用 "高 "冷却模式进行的。
处理器
的英特尔酷睿i7-1260P是一款适用于薄型笔记本电脑的高端处理器。八个E核和四个P核提供16个线程。在LG Gram的PL1和PL2的配置下,APU的表现有些低于其潜力。这在所有基准测试中都很明显。即使LG Gram的分数不能被认为是差的,但其结果还是略低于CPU的平均水平。然而,在我们的头对头比较中,我们的评测模型轻松地击败了其他两台LG Gram 17s。一方面,酷睿i7本来就比其他两台LG笔记本电脑中的i5处理器更强大,但另一方面,评测设备的PL1略高。
在 "低 "冷却模式下,处理器的性能严重下降,这一点也很明显。在 "高 "冷却模式下,该处理器在11分钟内完成了Cinebench R23循环的七次运行。在安静模式下,11分钟后只记录了三次运行。换句话说,性能下降了50%以上。
Cinebench R15 Multi Continuous Test
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Average of class Multimedia | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Average of class Multimedia (6936 - 30789, n=100, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (3173 - 12150, n=27) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 | |
Average of class Multimedia (878 - 2290, n=91, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (1155 - 1812, n=25) | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Average of class Multimedia (2681 - 11768, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (1234 - 4748, n=25) | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
Average of class Multimedia (341 - 853, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (448 - 698, n=25) | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average of class Multimedia (1252 - 4774, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (549 - 2034, n=29) | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 | |
LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Average of class Multimedia (99.6 - 323, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (165.4 - 260, n=27) | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G | |
LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (264 - 906, n=26) | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Average of class Multimedia (107 - 502, n=84, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Average of class Multimedia (30592 - 121228, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (16146 - 47064, n=25) | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Average of class Multimedia (3398 - 7545, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (4064 - 5791, n=25) | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
Average of class Multimedia (4990 - 23059, n=86, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (3866 - 10570, n=25) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Average of class Multimedia (891 - 2342, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (1436 - 1786, n=25) | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
Average of class Multimedia (5.26 - 30.5, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (3.45 - 13.6, n=26) | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G | |
Average of class Multimedia (6.7 - 146.7, n=80, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (40.2 - 65.7, n=25) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G | |
LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (0.4559 - 0.727, n=25) | |
Average of class Multimedia (0.3604 - 0.947, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
Average of class Multimedia | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P | |
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
Average of class Multimedia (4906 - 36957, n=76, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (2176 - 10898, n=26) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 | |
LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Average of class Multimedia (14528 - 147248, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (11015 - 56906, n=26) | |
LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G | |
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Average of class Multimedia (1529 - 6698, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (669 - 2709, n=26) | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G | |
LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
Average of class Multimedia (21547 - 141074, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (42571 - 82493, n=26) | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
Average of class Multimedia (1240 - 19021, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (2901 - 6975, n=26) | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Average of class Multimedia (9903 - 75780, n=76, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (5950 - 26376, n=26) | |
LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G | |
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
Average of class Multimedia (31432 - 169946, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (16041 - 92356, n=26) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
LG Gram 17 (2022) |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Average of class Multimedia (454 - 1973, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (259 - 771, n=26) | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
Average of class Multimedia (2738 - 20608, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (1237 - 5858, n=26) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 | |
LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
Average of class Multimedia (7419 - 53918, n=77, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 | |
LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (13261 - 43652, n=26) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q |
系统性能
在PCMark 10中,评测设备比没有dGPU的LG Gram 17有一个明显的优势,这个基准比Crossmark更能突出显卡的性能。在这种情况下,LG Gram 17Z90Q-G.AA56G享有一个小的性能优势,这要归功于一个更高的提升性能。此外,由于NvidiaGeForce ,当涉及到其可能的应用范围时,我们的评测设备的功能更多。这款笔记本电脑在日常情况下绝对有用。由于有了dGPU,视频和照片编辑等创造性应用在该设备上的运行速度比没有dGPU的LG笔记本电脑快。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
Average of class Multimedia (4542 - 8670, n=72, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile () | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 | |
LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Average of class Multimedia (8480 - 12420, n=72, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 | |
LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile () | |
LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile () | |
Average of class Multimedia (6089 - 10742, n=72, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 | |
LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G | |
LG Gram 17 (2022) |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Average of class Multimedia (3651 - 13548, n=72, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile () | |
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
Average of class Multimedia (978 - 2184, n=87, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile () | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
Average of class Multimedia (913 - 2064, n=87, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile () |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
Average of class Multimedia (1054 - 2594, n=87, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile () | |
LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
Average of class Multimedia (869 - 2171, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile () |
PCMark 10 Score | 6405 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
Average of class Multimedia (20549 - 104459, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 | |
LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G | |
LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (25125 - 71544, n=25) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
Average of class Multimedia (22917 - 125604, n=77, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G | |
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (24983 - 72065, n=25) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
Average of class Multimedia (20226 - 117933, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 | |
LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (23512 - 66799, n=25) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
Average of class Multimedia (7 - 346, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (77.9 - 118.4, n=21) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延迟
使用最新的驱动程序,在本次审查时,当涉及到实时应用程序时,性能并不流畅。用LatencyMon确定的DPC延迟非常高。在4k 60Hz的流媒体测试中,只有两帧被丢弃。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G | |
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q |
* ... smaller is better
大容量存储
只要保持冷却,三星PM9A1是一个相对快速的固态硬盘。LG Gram 17的NVMe存储似乎会过热。仅仅在短时间的操作后,读写速度就明显下降。
* ... smaller is better
Continuous Performance Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
在此期间,NvidiaGeForce RTX 2050有两个直接的继任者,这意味着它不再是街区上的新孩子。然而,它与LG Gram 17很匹配,设法避免压倒纤细的冷却系统,同时,满足于不到30瓦的功率。然而,在LG Gram 17中,该芯片的表现低于平均水平。大多数笔记本电脑在这里有更高的TGP。因此,该芯片取得了比其他超薄笔记本电脑中的iGPU更好的结果,但一旦安装了现代dGPU,似乎就有点被打败了,这一点应该不奇怪。从另一个角度看,基准测试结果显示英特尔和AMD的iGPU已经很强大了。与LG Gram 17中的RTX 2050相比,关于内存要求较低的3D应用,其性能差异相对较小。然而,在渲染领域,dGPU的4GB GDDR6内存具有明显的性能优势。
3DMark 11 Performance | 9246 points | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 92983 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 23186 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 7287 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 1230 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
在游戏时,dGPU的性能优势更加显著。此外,在较新的游戏中,RTX 2050可以管理相对较好的帧率,这类帧率远远领先于英特尔和AMD的iGPU。然而,光线追踪游戏显示了显卡的极限。在《F1 2022》中,一旦启动光线追踪,Benchmark确定的帧率就会急剧下降。另一个因素是小的图形内存。RTX 2050在面对更多现代游戏的内存要求时有一场大仗要打。4GB的GDDR6内存往往不足以在高设置下流畅地运行当前的游戏。
显然,在一些游戏中存在帧数限制,因为在Witcher 3 、GTA V和Strange Brigade中,帧数上限为158 fps。
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Average of class Multimedia (8 - 143.2, n=80, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G | |
LG Gram 17 (2022) |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
Average of class Multimedia (5.09 - 126.3, n=80, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 | |
LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G | |
LG Gram 17 (2022) |
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 156.7 | 156.7 | 77.2 | 39.8 | ||
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 65 | 48.7 | 33.7 | |||
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 134.4 | 119.5 | 70.9 | 66.1 | 34 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 52.6 | 40 | 28.2 | 20.5 | ||
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 87.6 | 81.6 | 59.4 | 58.9 | ||
Strange Brigade (2018) | 157.9 | 67.4 | 55.4 | 48 | ||
F1 22 (2022) | 95.5 | 59.8 | 54.6 | 5.23 | ||
FIFA 23 (2022) | 56 | 47 | 40 | 36 | ||
A Plague Tale Requiem (2022) | 33 | 25.5 | 21.3 | |||
Uncharted Legacy of Thieves Collection (2022) | 32 | 27.3 | ||||
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 2022 (2022) | 52 | 18 | 15 | 10 | ||
Spider-Man Miles Morales (2022) | 41.6 | 32 | 29.6 | |||
The Callisto Protocol (2022) | 46.25 | 34.95 | ||||
Need for Speed Unbound (2022) | 54 | 27.9 | 19 | |||
Dead Space Remake (2023) | 41 | 32.6 | 26 | 22.1 |
排放--使用dGPU时声音明显增大
噪声排放
在负载情况下,49dB(A),评测设备的风扇明显比其他LG Gram 17s的风扇更响。此前评测的该系列的另外两款机型在负载下甚至没有达到40 dB(A)。然而,这台LG Gram 17也有一个dGPU,必须处理更多的废热。如果要求笔记本电脑安静地运行,"低 "冷却模式就在手边。使用这种模式,不仅笔记本的性能会大幅降低,而且风扇的噪音也会降低。然后,风扇就几乎听不见了。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 28 / 28 / 28.8 dB(A) |
Load |
| 49.3 / 49.1 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 26 dB(A) |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH | Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 A350M, i7-1260P, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU | LG Gram 17 (2022) Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ | LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 Radeon 660M, R5 6600HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 8% | 6% | 14% | 20% | 16% | 11% | |
off / environment * | 26 | 24.6 5% | 24.3 7% | 25.1 3% | 25 4% | 22.8 12% | 25 4% |
Idle Minimum * | 28 | 24.6 12% | 24.3 13% | 25.12 10% | 25 11% | 22.9 18% | 25 11% |
Idle Average * | 28 | 24.6 12% | 24.3 13% | 25.15 10% | 25 11% | 22.9 18% | 26 7% |
Idle Maximum * | 28.8 | 24.6 15% | 29.8 -3% | 26 10% | 26 10% | 22.9 20% | 28 3% |
Load Average * | 49.3 | 45.1 9% | 47.5 4% | 36.9 25% | 27.7 44% | 33.2 33% | 44 11% |
Load Maximum * | 49.1 | 50.4 -3% | 47.5 3% | 37.2 24% | 30.5 38% | 52.8 -8% | 35 29% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 49.1 | 47.5 | 47.3 | 35 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
在负载下,LG Gram 17的表面不会比该系列的其他设备明显发热。然而,如果笔记本电脑与用户的膝盖接触,超过50℃的热点是令人不快的。同样,在该设备的顶部,靠近键盘的地方也可以发现高温。幸运的是,机箱内的热量分布是这样的,在最重要的接触点上没有令人不舒服的高温,如掌托、触摸板和按键。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 50.3 °C / 123 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 52.5 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.1 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31 °C / 87.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-2.2 °C / -4 F).
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G Intel Core i7-1260P, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Arc A350M | LG Gram 17 (2022) Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS, AMD Radeon 660M | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -2% | 7% | -9% | 9% | -12% | 3% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 50.3 | 48 5% | 44.6 11% | 50 1% | 43.6 13% | 36 28% | 46 9% |
Maximum Bottom * | 52.5 | 50.2 4% | 47.5 10% | 50 5% | 41.4 21% | 47.2 10% | 48 9% |
Idle Upper Side * | 26.9 | 27.7 -3% | 25.8 4% | 31.5 -17% | 26.4 2% | 37 -38% | 28 -4% |
Idle Bottom * | 26.5 | 30.1 -14% | 26.1 2% | 33.5 -26% | 27 -2% | 39.2 -48% | 27 -2% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
在短暂的启动阶段后,CPU和GPU的启动总功率为47瓦。在整个压力测试期间,英特尔酷睿i7-1260P的性能保持在15瓦的稳定水平。相比之下,Nvidia RTX 2050的性能在8分钟后已经开始下降。从33瓦的起点,到压力测试结束时,日志记录只有26瓦。7瓦的差异导致GPU时钟从830MHz下降到500MHz左右。
GPU和CPU的观察目标温度在88℃左右。对于这样一台轻薄的笔记本电脑来说,这是一个相对较高的数字。
发言人
如果需要,LG Gram 17的两个扬声器可以变得相当响亮,但低频缺乏力量,几乎没有任何低音从这个大型笔记本电脑中传出。然而,从中音到高音,声音是非常平衡的。在8,000赫兹左右的区域可以找到一个例外,这显然是太大声了。
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 45% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (71.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 24% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理--由于90Wh的电池,电池寿命更长。
消耗功率
在我们的Prime95和Furmark压力测试中,LG的65瓦电源适配器达到了它的极限,使它显得有些动力不足。LG应该包括一个功率稍大的USB-C电源适配器。只要笔记本在空闲状态下运行,在4到12瓦的情况下,功耗就会达到Nvidia RTX 2050笔记本的预期水平。总而言之,LG Gram 17在功耗方面可以说是一般。
Off / Standby | 0.4 / 1 Watt |
Idle | 4.1 / 9.8 / 12 Watt |
Load |
49.3 / 66 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G i7-1260P, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 17" | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH, IPS, 3072x1920, 14.5" | Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 i7-1260P, A350M, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | LG Gram 17 (2022) i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, IPS, 2560x1600, 17" | LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ, IPS, 2560x1600, 17" | Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00, OLED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 R5 6600HS, Radeon 660M, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | Average of class Multimedia | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -48% | 4% | 3% | 14% | -37% | -4% | -17% | -43% | |
Idle Minimum * | 4.1 | 7.1 -73% | 4 2% | 4 2% | 4.9 -20% | 5.5 -34% | 4 2% | 5.11 ? -25% | 6.78 ? -65% |
Idle Average * | 9.8 | 10.8 -10% | 7.8 20% | 12.2 -24% | 10.8 -10% | 7.4 24% | 7 29% | 9.15 ? 7% | 11.3 ? -15% |
Idle Maximum * | 12 | 11.6 3% | 8.5 29% | 13.2 -10% | 14 -17% | 14.9 -24% | 13 -8% | 11.2 ? 7% | 13.4 ? -12% |
Load Average * | 49.3 | 84.8 -72% | 59.1 -20% | 34 31% | 26.4 46% | 78.2 -59% | 61 -24% | 70.6 ? -43% | 71.1 ? -44% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 49.3 | 91.3 -85% | 56.7 -15% | 39.4 20% | 26.3 47% | 80.1 -62% | 42.8 13% | ||
Load Maximum * | 66 | 100.8 -53% | 62.4 5% | 65.9 -0% | 42 36% | 110.9 -68% | 88 -33% | 87.4 ? -32% | 117.3 ? -78% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test
Power consumption with an external monitor
电池寿命
电池上的大字宣称其容量为90Wh。这对许多笔记本电脑来说是一个很高的数字,但对一个只有1.4公斤的秤来说是非常好的。这使得在WiFi网络冲浪测试中的运行时间远远超过14小时。此外,在日常使用中,LG Gram 17可以很容易地管理超过一个完整的工作日,而不需要插电。其他配置的笔记本电脑,如 LG Gram 17Z90Q-G.AA56G必须使用80Wh的电池。
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G i7-1260P, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, 90 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, 70 Wh | Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 i7-1260P, A350M, 54 Wh | LG Gram 17 (2022) i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 80 Wh | LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 80 Wh | Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 96 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ARH7 R5 6600HS, Radeon 660M, 75 Wh | Average of class Multimedia | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -40% | -37% | 8% | 4% | 28% | -33% | -26% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 872 | 434 -50% | 494 -43% | 669 -23% | 763 -12% | 766 -12% | 588 -33% | 628 ? -28% |
Load | 129 | 92 -29% | 90 -30% | 179 39% | 155 20% | 215 67% | 97.8 ? -24% | |
H.264 | 532 | 635 | 844 | 821 ? | ||||
Reader / Idle | 1692 | 2014 | 1571 | 1168 ? |
Pros
Cons
评语 - 适合日常使用,但不是动力源
LG Gram这个名字是轻薄笔记本电脑的代名词。LG一直在寻求节省每一个可以想象的克数,无论多么小。作为回报,关于该设备的部分性能潜力也有妥协。尽管如此,不得不说这台笔记本电脑仍然非常强大。考虑到所提供的硬件,基准测试可能低于平均水平,但它们仍然表明我们面对的是一台强大的机器。最重要的是,该设备在电池模式下拥有令人印象深刻的耐力水平。与前代产品相比,另一个实际的改进是现在的哑光显示屏,在任何可能的情况下都是可读的。
底线是,Gram 17向我们展示了大型笔记本电脑可以有多轻,而不必在日常使用中做出性能妥协。
任何寻找轻型、配备dGPU、电池寿命长的笔记本电脑的人都应该看看LG Gram 17。如果重量和电池寿命不是一个问题,可能有很多更好的笔记本电脑可以选择。 可能的竞争对手包括三星Galaxy Book和华硕Zenbook,这两款设备都能提供明显更好的计算能力。在不远的将来,我们将有一个广泛的报告,介绍最近宣布的LG Gram的哪些变化。 2023年LG Gram.
价格和可利用性
目前,LG Gram 17 2022(2TB SSD)在亚马逊上可以买到,价格为1997美元.LG提供一个较低规格的模型(1TB SSD,16GB内存),在他们自己的商店为1799美元。.
LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G
- 02/25/2023 v7 (old)
Marc Herter