Notebookcheck Logo

LG K10 智能手机简短评测

不见五指。 LG K10希望把时尚带进中低端市场。请阅读我们的评测了解为什么它的相机和屏幕效果限制了它的表现。
Android ARM Smartphone Touchscreen
LG K10 (K Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 4 x 1.4 GHz, Cortex-A53
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 306
Memory
1536 MB 
Display
5.30 inch 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixel 277 PPI, 电容式, IPS, glossy: yes
Storage
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 12.3 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米耳机接口, Card Reader: micro-SD 最大支持 128 GB, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 加速传感器,近距传感器,指南针
Networking
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM (850/900/1800/1900), UMTS (850/900/1900/2100), LTE (B1/B3/B7/B8/B20); (下载/上传): 150Mbps/50Mbps (LTE); 辐射值: 0.462W/kg (头部), 1.48W/kg (身体), LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.8 x 146.6 x 74.8
Battery
8.8 Wh, 2300 mAh Lithium-Ion, removeable
Operating System
Android 5.1 Lollipop
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix 自动对焦, LED闪光灯, 视频拍摄 @1080p/30 FPS
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: 后置单声道扬声器, Keyboard: 触控, 电源适配器,USB数据线,耳机, 24 Months Warranty, FM 收音机, fanless
Weight
140 g, Power Supply: 49 g
Price
199 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

GPS Garmin Edge: overview
GPS Garmin Edge: overview
GPS Garmin Edge: crossing
GPS Garmin Edge: crossing
GPS Garmin Edge: riverside
GPS Garmin Edge: riverside
GPS LG K10: overview
GPS LG K10: overview
GPS LG K10: crossing
GPS LG K10: crossing
GPS LG K10: riverside
GPS LG K10: riverside

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
orginal image
click to load images
351
cd/m²
352
cd/m²
346
cd/m²
358
cd/m²
370
cd/m²
346
cd/m²
353
cd/m²
376
cd/m²
345
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 376 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 355.2 cd/m² Minimum: 4.43 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 370 cd/m²
Contrast: 1321:1 (Black: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 7.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.21
LG K10
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Archos Diamond S
Mali-T720 MP4, MT6753, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL
Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Acer Liquid Z630
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash
LG Class
Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Honor 5X
Adreno 405, 616 MSM8939v2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Screen
17%
28%
18%
6%
17%
Brightness middle
370
357
-4%
467
26%
334
-10%
518
40%
535
45%
Brightness
355
363
2%
460
30%
326
-8%
492
39%
521
47%
Brightness Distribution
92
95
3%
95
3%
91
-1%
91
-1%
85
-8%
Black Level *
0.28
0.3
-7%
0.19
32%
0.51
-82%
0.43
-54%
Contrast
1321
1557
18%
1758
33%
1016
-23%
1244
-6%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
6.7
6.11
9%
3.28
51%
4.52
33%
5.41
19%
4.88
27%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
17.8
9.91
44%
8.76
51%
8.66
51%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
7.9
4.12
48%
1.89
76%
4.39
44%
7.67
3%
5.2
34%
Gamma
2.21 100%
2.24 98%
2.21 100%
2.23 99%
2.19 100%
2.26 97%
CCT
9072 72%
7272 89%
6734 97%
6917 94%
8521 76%
7766 84%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
90.9118

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18 ms rise
↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
60 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 38 ms rise
↘ 22 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 95 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
LG K10
27383 Points
Archos Diamond S
35194 Points +29%
Honor 5X
37152 Points +36%
Geekbench 3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
LG K10
476 Points
Archos Diamond S
620 Points +30%
Honor 5X
698 Points +47%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
LG K10
1448 Points
Archos Diamond S
2898 Points +100%
Honor 5X
3047 Points +110%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
LG K10
4339 Points
Archos Diamond S
6892 Points +59%
Acer Liquid Z630
4965 Points +14%
Honor 5X
7852 Points +81%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
LG K10
3774 Points
Archos Diamond S
6288 Points +67%
Acer Liquid Z630
4408 Points +17%
Honor 5X
7764 Points +106%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
LG K10
9106 Points
Archos Diamond S
10387 Points +14%
Acer Liquid Z630
8900 Points -2%
Honor 5X
8174 Points -10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
LG K10
52 Points
Archos Diamond S
289 Points +456%
LG Class
52 Points 0%
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL
52 Points 0%
Honor 5X
129 Points +148%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
LG K10
41 Points
Archos Diamond S
238 Points +480%
LG Class
41 Points 0%
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL
41 Points 0%
Honor 5X
103 Points +151%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
LG K10
730 Points
Archos Diamond S
1172 Points +61%
LG Class
744 Points +2%
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL
733 Points 0%
Honor 5X
1089 Points +49%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
LG K10
9.7 fps
Archos Diamond S
21 fps +116%
LG Class
5.2 fps -46%
Acer Liquid Z630
15 fps +55%
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL
9.2 fps -5%
Honor 5X
14 fps +44%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
LG K10
5.2 fps
Archos Diamond S
12 fps +131%
LG Class
9.8 fps +88%
Acer Liquid Z630
8.5 fps +63%
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL
5.2 fps 0%
Honor 5X
14 fps +169%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
LG K10
4.1 fps
Archos Diamond S
9 fps +120%
LG Class
4.1 fps 0%
Acer Liquid Z630
3.9 fps -5%
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL
3.8 fps -7%
Honor 5X
5.9 fps +44%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
LG K10
1.8 fps
Archos Diamond S
4.2 fps +133%
LG Class
1.8 fps 0%
Acer Liquid Z630
2.3 fps +28%
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL
1.8 fps 0%
Honor 5X
5.4 fps +200%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
LG K10
3999 Points
Archos Diamond S
3819 Points -5%
LG Class
3803 Points -5%
Honor 5X
3794 Points -5%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
LG K10
536 Points
Archos Diamond S
850 Points +59%
LG Class
561 Points +5%
Acer Liquid Z630
585 Points +9%
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL
646 Points +21%
Honor 5X
297 Points -45%
System (sort by value)
LG K10
1050 Points
Archos Diamond S
1792 Points +71%
LG Class
1068 Points +2%
Acer Liquid Z630
1090 Points +4%
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL
1077 Points +3%
Honor 5X
1378 Points +31%
Memory (sort by value)
LG K10
453 Points
Archos Diamond S
949 Points +109%
LG Class
427 Points -6%
Acer Liquid Z630
503 Points +11%
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL
797 Points +76%
Honor 5X
787 Points +74%
Graphics (sort by value)
LG K10
310 Points
Archos Diamond S
421 Points +36%
LG Class
312 Points +1%
Acer Liquid Z630
283 Points -9%
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL
316 Points +2%
Honor 5X
763 Points +146%
Web (sort by value)
LG K10
562 Points
Archos Diamond S
729 Points +30%
LG Class
696 Points +24%
Acer Liquid Z630
753 Points +34%
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL
643 Points +14%
Honor 5X
9 Points -98%

Legend

 
LG K10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Archos Diamond S Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
LG Class Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Acer Liquid Z630 Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor 5X Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2, Qualcomm Adreno 405, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
LG K10
16638 ms *
Archos Diamond S
13398 ms * +19%
LG Class
13980 ms * +16%
Acer Liquid Z630
14718 ms * +12%
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL
14680 ms * +12%
Honor 5X
12510 ms * +25%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
LG K10
2838 Points
Archos Diamond S
2754 Points -3%
LG Class
3028 Points +7%
Acer Liquid Z630
3073 Points +8%
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL
3012 Points +6%
Honor 5X
3595 Points +27%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)
LG K10
47 Points
LG Class
57 Points +21%
Honor 5X
65 Points +38%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
LG K10
17.48 Points
Archos Diamond S
18 Points +3%
Honor 5X
21.92 Points +25%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
LG K10
131 MB/s
Archos Diamond S
138.3 MB/s +6%
LG Class
128.6 MB/s -2%
Acer Liquid Z630
230.4 MB/s +76%
Honor 5X
144 MB/s +10%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
LG K10
78 MB/s
Archos Diamond S
12.26 MB/s -84%
LG Class
74.1 MB/s -5%
Acer Liquid Z630
41.82 MB/s -46%
Honor 5X
78 MB/s 0%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
LG K10
9.2 MB/s
Archos Diamond S
15.85 MB/s +72%
LG Class
9.67 MB/s +5%
Acer Liquid Z630
28.95 MB/s +215%
Honor 5X
17 MB/s +85%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
LG K10
7.5 MB/s
Archos Diamond S
5.55 MB/s -26%
LG Class
7.7 MB/s +3%
Acer Liquid Z630
9.12 MB/s +22%
Honor 5X
10 MB/s +33%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
LG K10
75.5 MB/s
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
LG K10
45 MB/s
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 SettingsValue
 high16 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 SettingsValue
 high30 fps
Max. Load
 37 °C35 °C33.4 °C 
 38.3 °C34.9 °C34.1 °C 
 37.9 °C34.5 °C33.4 °C 
Maximum: 38.3 °C
Average: 35.4 °C
33.9 °C36 °C40.3 °C
34.1 °C35.6 °C37.8 °C
31.9 °C32.7 °C35.8 °C
Maximum: 40.3 °C
Average: 35.3 °C
Power Supply (max.)  35.5 °C | Room Temperature 21.8 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.4 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.3 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.3 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.7 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
18h 43min
WiFi Websurfing
7h 33min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10h 03min
Load (maximum brightness)
3h 51min
LG K10
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL
Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Archos Diamond S
Mali-T720 MP4, MT6753, 16 GB eMMC Flash
LG Class
Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Acer Liquid Z630
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Honor 5X
Adreno 405, 616 MSM8939v2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Battery Runtime
-41%
5%
-8%
66%
-1%
Reader / Idle
1123
976
-13%
1530
36%
1053
-6%
H.264
603
628
4%
806
34%
602
0%
WiFi v1.3
453
267
-41%
475
5%
422
-7%
839
85%
643
42%
Load
231
196
-15%
481
108%
144
-38%

Pros

+ 时尚而坚固的机身
+ 优秀的信号质量
+ 不错的通话音质
+ 不错的屏幕黑值
+ 稳定的可视角度范围
+ 响亮的扬声器
+ 实用的电池续航
+ 可更换电池

Cons

- 迟缓的GPS模组
- 相机照片昏暗
- 屏幕亮度一般
- 色彩偏蓝
- 性能较弱
In review: LG K10. Review sample courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de
In review: LG K10. Review sample courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de

LG的K10是一款结合了舒适手感,优秀的通话音质和信号接收、软件,优秀机身品质和长电池续航的智能手机产品。不多也不少。尽管它可能无法满足高要求的用户,但也不会让任何人失望。它是一款全面可靠的设备,凭借2.5D玻璃表面和纹理机背独一无二。

不过,用户可能会对它较暗同时偏蓝的屏幕,模糊的照片和迟缓的GPS感到失望。

可能不会有任何人会对LG K10一见倾心:它在许多方面都表现中庸。不过把智能手机当作日常工具的用户可能则会十分满意。

LG K10有一些弱点,但也有一些优势,整体上可圈可点。正在寻找一台支持LTE而不常用相机,喜欢K10设计的用户可以考虑这台LG设备,不过我们也建议同时参考其他众多竞争者的产品。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。 

LG K10 - 05/09/2016 v5.1 (old)
Florian Wimmer

Chassis
86%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 90%
Pointing Device
88%
Connectivity
37 / 60 → 61%
Weight
93%
Battery
91%
Display
82%
Games Performance
5 / 63 → 8%
Application Performance
29 / 70 → 42%
Temperature
90%
Noise
100%
Audio
56 / 91 → 62%
Camera
67%
Average
68%
81%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > LG K10 智能手机简短评测
Florian Wimmer, 2016-05-19 (Update: 2016-05-21)