LG K10 (2017) 智能手机简短评测
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
Size Comparison
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
HTC One A9s | |
LG K10 2017 | |
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
HTC One A9s | |
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL | |
LG K10 2017 |
|
Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 384 cd/m²
Contrast: 1067:1 (Black: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 5.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2
LG K10 2017 IPS, 1280x720, 5.3" | Samsung Galaxy J3 2016 Super AMOLED, 1280x720, 5" | Lenovo Moto G4 Play IPS, 1280x720, 5" | HTC One A9s IPS, 1280x720, 5" | Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL IPS, 1280x720, 5.2" | LG K10 IPS, 1280x720, 5.3" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 6% | 4% | 24% | 13% | -3% | |
Brightness middle | 384 | 295 -23% | 412 7% | 348 -9% | 507 32% | 370 -4% |
Brightness | 350 | 299 -15% | 414 18% | 320 -9% | 474 35% | 355 1% |
Brightness Distribution | 85 | 96 13% | 94 11% | 85 0% | 85 0% | 92 8% |
Black Level * | 0.36 | 0.42 -17% | 0.23 36% | 0.53 -47% | 0.28 22% | |
Contrast | 1067 | 981 -8% | 1513 42% | 957 -10% | 1321 24% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6 | 5.8 3% | 5.6 7% | 3.5 42% | 4.7 22% | 6.7 -12% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 14 | 8.6 39% | 9.7 31% | 6.4 54% | 7.2 49% | 17.8 -27% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.9 | 4.8 19% | 6.9 -17% | 4 32% | 4.8 19% | 7.9 -34% |
Gamma | 2 110% | 1.84 120% | 2.4 92% | 2.3 96% | 2.25 98% | 2.21 100% |
CCT | 8042 81% | 6252 104% | 8422 77% | 6527 100% | 6441 101% | 9072 72% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8719 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
31.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17.6 ms rise | |
↘ 14 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
50 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 25 ms rise | |
↘ 25 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
LG K10 2017 | |
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016 | |
Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
HTC One A9s | |
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL | |
LG K10 |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
LG K10 2017 | |
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016 | |
Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
HTC One A9s | |
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL | |
LG K10 | |
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
LG K10 2017 | |
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016 | |
Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
HTC One A9s | |
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL | |
LG K10 |
GFXBench 3.0 | |
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
LG K10 2017 | |
Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
HTC One A9s | |
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL | |
LG K10 | |
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
LG K10 2017 | |
Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
HTC One A9s | |
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL | |
LG K10 |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
LG K10 2017 | |
HTC One A9s | |
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL | |
LG K10 | |
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
LG K10 2017 | |
HTC One A9s | |
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL | |
LG K10 |
PCMark for Android - Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
LG K10 2017 |
Geekbench 4.4 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
LG K10 2017 | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
LG K10 2017 | |
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value) | |
LG K10 2017 |
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
LG K10 2017 | |
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016 | |
Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
HTC One A9s | |
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL | |
LG K10 |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
LG K10 2017 | |
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016 | |
Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
HTC One A9s | |
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL | |
LG K10 |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
LG K10 2017 | |
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016 | |
Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
HTC One A9s | |
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL | |
LG K10 |
* ... smaller is better
Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
Settings | Value | ||
high | 29 fps | ||
very low | 30 fps |
Dead Trigger 2 | |||
Settings | Value | ||
high | 51 fps |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.1 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.3 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.5 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
LG K10 2017 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 33% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 12.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (14.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (39% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 85% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 94% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HTC One A9s audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 11.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 72% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 84% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Off / Standby | 0.03 / 0.17 Watt |
Idle | 0.76 / 1.59 / 1.61 Watt |
Load |
3.24 / 4.15 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
LG K10 2017 2800 mAh | Samsung Galaxy J3 2016 2600 mAh | Lenovo Moto G4 Play 2800 mAh | HTC One A9s 2300 mAh | Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL 4100 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 16% | 3% | -47% | -39% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.76 | 0.96 -26% | 0.68 11% | 1.29 -70% | 0.74 3% |
Idle Average * | 1.59 | 1.14 28% | 1.58 1% | 2.28 -43% | 2.04 -28% |
Idle Maximum * | 1.61 | 1.23 24% | 1.61 -0% | 2.52 -57% | 2.22 -38% |
Load Average * | 3.24 | 2.45 24% | 3.36 -4% | 4.06 -25% | 5.57 -72% |
Load Maximum * | 4.15 | 2.92 30% | 3.91 6% | 5.91 -42% | 6.59 -59% |
* ... smaller is better
LG K10 2017 2800 mAh | Samsung Galaxy J3 2016 2600 mAh | Lenovo Moto G4 Play 2800 mAh | HTC One A9s 2300 mAh | Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL 4100 mAh | LG K10 2300 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 4% | 17% | -5% | 23% | -16% | |
Reader / Idle | 1477 | 1212 -18% | 1998 35% | 1543 4% | 1462 -1% | 1123 -24% |
H.264 | 613 | 590 -4% | 683 11% | 587 -4% | 845 38% | 603 -2% |
WiFi v1.3 | 532 | 502 -6% | 630 18% | 517 -3% | 814 53% | 453 -15% |
Load | 298 | 433 45% | 306 3% | 245 -18% | 301 1% | 231 -22% |
Pros
Cons
LG K10 (2017) 毋庸置疑做到了一点:它相比前代机型有了明显进步。它的机身更薄,品质更高,电池续航时间也更长——同时性能也有所提高。LG K10 (2017)在性能上的改进十分明显,甚至超过了不少竞争设备。只有HTC One A9s相对性能更强,不过它不是在同一价位上。
当然它也有不少让我们不满意的地方。它的扬声器音质刺耳,这也让免提模式变得难以使用。同时,它的麦克风质量十分一般,屏幕也相对昏暗。幸好我们的抱怨也到此为止:LG K10 (2017) 采用最新操作系统,功耗不高,相机的拍摄效果也不错。
LG K10 (2017)的高性能和可更换电池是它最大的优势。塑料材质的机身也给了我们不错的使用感受。在音质上,LG还需要作出改进,不过整体上LG K10 (2017)是一台优秀的实惠型智能手机。
整体上,我们可以向用户推荐LG K10 (2017)。需要更大电池容量的用户可以考虑Asus Zenfone 3 Max,不过相比LG K10 (2017),这台设备的电池无法更换。HTC One A9s也是如此,不过用户可以得到更强的性能。不论如何,目前售价不足200欧元(约1477人民币)的LG K10 (2017)性价比很高。
注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。
LG K10 2017
- 04/12/2017 v6 (old)
Florian Wimmer