LG K8 (2017) 智能手机简短评测

Name: LG K8 2017
Brand: LG

小兄弟。 2017年的LG K8 比起LG K10更加实惠，更小，性能更弱。但他对于那些购买廉价手机的人来说可能是更好的选择？我们将会在我们的测试中找出答案。

Florian Wimmer, ✓ Sven Kloevekorn (translated by Delta Zhang), Published 05/14/2017 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Touchscreen Smartphone

Test device courtesy of LG Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

LG K8 2017 (K Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) 4 x 1.4 GHz, Cortex-A53

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 308

Memory

1536 MB

Display

5.00 inch 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixel 294 PPI, 电容触摸屏, IPS, glossy: yes

Storage

16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB

, 8.81 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5mm 音频复合接口, Card Reader: 最大32GB microSD 存储卡, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 加速度计, 距离传感器, USB-OTG, Wi-Fi Direct

Networking

802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (850/900/1900/2100), UMTS (850/900/2100), LTE (B1/B3/B7/B8/B20); bandwidth (Download/Upload): 150Mbps/50Mbps; SAR value: 0.433 W/Kg (head), 1.220 W/kg (body), LTE, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.1 x 144.8 x 72.1

Battery

9.6 Wh, 2500 mAh Lithium-Ion, removeable, Talk time 2G (according to manufacturer): 20 h, Talk time 3G (according to manufacturer): 18 h, Standby 2G (according to manufacturer): 410 h, Standby 3G (according to manufacturer): 490 h

Operating System

Android 7.0 Nougat

Camera

Primary Camera: 13 MPix f/2.2, 相位自动对焦, LED 闪光灯, 录像@1080p/30 FPS
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix f/2.4, 录像@1080p

Additional features

Speakers: 后置扬声器, Keyboard: 虚拟键盘, 充电器, USB 线缆, LG Backup, LG SmartWorld, RemoteCall Service, 24 Months Warranty, FM 收音机, fanless

Weight

142 g, Power Supply: 48 g

Price

159 Euro

Links

LG homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 16 GB eMMC Flash	106 MBit/s +115%
LG K10 2017 Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 16 GB eMMC Flash	54.6 MBit/s +11%
Lenovo K6 Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash	52.4 MBit/s +7%
LG K8 2017 Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash	49.2 MBit/s
Gigaset GS160 Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash	48.2 MBit/s -2%
iperf3 receive AX12
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 16 GB eMMC Flash	99.7 MBit/s +84%
LG K8 2017 Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash	54.1 MBit/s
Lenovo K6 Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash	51.9 MBit/s -4%
LG K10 2017 Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 16 GB eMMC Flash	46.2 MBit/s -15%
Gigaset GS160 Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash	33.5 MBit/s -38%

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


361 cd/m²	359 cd/m²	334 cd/m²
356 cd/m²	358 cd/m²	343 cd/m²
348 cd/m²	359 cd/m²	339 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 361 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 350.8 cd/m² Minimum: 4.13 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 358 cd/m²
Contrast: 731:1 (Black: 0.49 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 6.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.12

	LG K8 2017 IPS, 1280x720, 5"	LG K10 2017 IPS, 1280x720, 5.3"	Huawei Y6 II Compact IPS, 1280x720, 5"	Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL IPS, 1280x720, 5"	Gigaset GS160 IPS, 1280x720, 5"	Lenovo K6 IPS, 1920x1080, 5"
Screen		13%	1%	22%	5%	28%
Brightness middle	358	384 7%	491 37%	459 28%	489 37%	470 31%
Brightness	351	350 0%	487 39%	452 29%	479 36%	461 31%
Brightness Distribution	93	85 -9%	92 -1%	84 -10%	95 2%	88 -5%
Black Level *	0.49	0.36 27%	0.9 -84%	0.42 14%	0.55 -12%	0.38 22%
Contrast	731	1067 46%	546 -25%	1093 50%	889 22%	1237 69%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	7.1	6 15%	6.6 7%	4.5 37%	8.3 -17%	5.2 27%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	14.9	14 6%	12.9 13%	10.6 29%	14.4 3%	9.5 36%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	6.5	5.9 9%	4.9 25%	6.5 -0%	8.7 -34%	5.6 14%
Gamma	2.12 ^104%	2 ^110%	2.12 ^104%	2.22 ^99%	2.08 ^106%	2.24 ^98%
CCT	8166 ^80%	8042 ^81%	7090 ^92%	7791 ^83%	9034 ^72%	7924 ^82%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

8929 Hz

≤ 25 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 8929 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 25 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 8929 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8706 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 11.6 ms rise
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 10.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
35.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 18.4 ms rise
35.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 17.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 46 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
LG K8 2017	30924 Points
LG K10 2017	39063 Points +26%
Huawei Y6 II Compact	33786 Points +9%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL	22218 Points -28%
Gigaset GS160	28459 Points -8%
Lenovo K6	43673 Points +41%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
LG K8 2017	2951 Points
LG K10 2017	7998 Points +171%
Huawei Y6 II Compact	4885 Points +66%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL	4298 Points +46%
Gigaset GS160	3780 Points +28%
Lenovo K6	9537 Points +223%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
LG K8 2017	2546 Points
LG K10 2017	7936 Points +212%
Huawei Y6 II Compact	4296 Points +69%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL	3836 Points +51%
Gigaset GS160	3291 Points +29%
Lenovo K6	9691 Points +281%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
LG K8 2017	6656 Points
LG K10 2017	8223 Points +24%
Huawei Y6 II Compact	9393 Points +41%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL	7429 Points +12%
Gigaset GS160	7881 Points +18%
Lenovo K6	9034 Points +36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
LG K8 2017	39 Points
LG K10 2017	445 Points +1041%
Huawei Y6 II Compact	203 Points +421%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL	53 Points +36%
Lenovo K6	554 Points +1321%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
LG K8 2017	31 Points
LG K10 2017	380 Points +1126%
Huawei Y6 II Compact	167 Points +439%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL	42 Points +35%
Lenovo K6	491 Points +1484%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
LG K8 2017	622 Points
LG K10 2017	1105 Points +78%
Huawei Y6 II Compact	826 Points +33%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL	558 Points -10%
Lenovo K6	1002 Points +61%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
LG K8 2017	6.4 fps
LG K10 2017	22 fps +244%
Huawei Y6 II Compact	15 fps +134%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL	9.4 fps +47%
Gigaset GS160	11 fps +72%
Lenovo K6	15 fps +134%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
LG K8 2017	3.4 fps
LG K10 2017	13 fps +282%
Huawei Y6 II Compact	8.4 fps +147%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL	5.2 fps +53%
Gigaset GS160	6 fps +76%
Lenovo K6	16 fps +371%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
LG K8 2017	3.7 fps
LG K10 2017	11 fps +197%
Huawei Y6 II Compact	6.1 fps +65%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL	3.8 fps +3%
Gigaset GS160	4.7 fps +27%
Lenovo K6	7 fps +89%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
LG K8 2017	1.3 fps
LG K10 2017	5.3 fps +308%
Huawei Y6 II Compact	2.8 fps +115%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL	1.8 fps +38%
Gigaset GS160	2.1 fps +62%
Lenovo K6	7.1 fps +446%

PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
LG K8 2017	4673 Points
Huawei Y6 II Compact	3400 Points -27%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL	2217 Points -53%
Gigaset GS160	2563 Points -45%
Lenovo K6	3387 Points -28%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
LG K8 2017	371 Points
LG K10 2017	821 Points +121%
Huawei Y6 II Compact	203 Points -45%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL	526 Points +42%
Gigaset GS160	178 Points -52%
Lenovo K6	263 Points -29%
System (sort by value)
LG K8 2017	1191 Points
LG K10 2017	1259 Points +6%
Huawei Y6 II Compact	1093 Points -8%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL	887 Points -26%
Gigaset GS160	1029 Points -14%
Lenovo K6	1282 Points +8%
Memory (sort by value)
LG K8 2017	634 Points
LG K10 2017	623 Points -2%
Huawei Y6 II Compact	571 Points -10%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL	526 Points -17%
Gigaset GS160	497 Points -22%
Lenovo K6	530 Points -16%
Graphics (sort by value)
LG K8 2017	436 Points
LG K10 2017	508 Points +17%
Huawei Y6 II Compact	283 Points -35%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL	308 Points -29%
Gigaset GS160	208 Points -52%
Lenovo K6	732 Points +68%
Web (sort by value)
LG K8 2017	616 Points
LG K10 2017	1137 Points +85%
Huawei Y6 II Compact	10 Points -98%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL	533 Points -13%
Gigaset GS160	9 Points -99%
Lenovo K6	10 Points -98%

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
LG K8 2017	642 Points
LG K10 2017	593 Points -8%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
LG K8 2017	1737 Points
LG K10 2017	2311 Points +33%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
LG K8 2017	1203 Points
LG K10 2017	1480 Points +23%

Legend

LG K8 2017 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Qualcomm Adreno 308, 16 GB eMMC Flash

LG K10 2017 Mediatek MT6750, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Huawei Y6 II Compact Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Gigaset GS160 Mediatek MT6737, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Lenovo K6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Qualcomm Adreno 505, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | Octane V2 | JetStream 1.1

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
LG K8 2017	10742 ms *
LG K10 2017	11708 ms * -9%
Huawei Y6 II Compact	13234 ms * -23%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL	15895 ms * -48%
Gigaset GS160	13907 ms * -29%
Lenovo K6	10850 ms * -1%

Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
LG K8 2017	3052 Points
LG K10 2017	3407 Points +12%
Huawei Y6 II Compact	2805 Points -8%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL	1938 Points -37%
Gigaset GS160	2493 Points -18%
Lenovo K6	3438 Points +13%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
LG K8 2017	17.12 Points
LG K10 2017	20.84 Points +22%
Huawei Y6 II Compact	18.3 Points +7%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL	14.1 Points -18%
Gigaset GS160	14.43 Points -16%
Lenovo K6	21.44 Points +25%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
LG K8 2017	270.8 MB/s
LG K10 2017	246.1 MB/s -9%
Huawei Y6 II Compact	211 MB/s -22%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL	143 MB/s -47%
Gigaset GS160	200.5 MB/s -26%
Lenovo K6	262.6 MB/s -3%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
LG K8 2017	84.6 MB/s
LG K10 2017	43.6 MB/s -48%
Huawei Y6 II Compact	75 MB/s -11%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL	42.4 MB/s -50%
Gigaset GS160	46.6 MB/s -45%
Lenovo K6	46.66 MB/s -45%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
LG K8 2017	41.6 MB/s
LG K10 2017	25.1 MB/s -40%
Huawei Y6 II Compact	23 MB/s -45%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL	19.7 MB/s -53%
Gigaset GS160	18.5 MB/s -56%
Lenovo K6	32.01 MB/s -23%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
LG K8 2017	12.5 MB/s
LG K10 2017	10.8 MB/s -14%
Huawei Y6 II Compact	15.5 MB/s +24%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL	6.9 MB/s -45%
Gigaset GS160	6.8 MB/s -46%
Lenovo K6	10.5 MB/s -16%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
LG K8 2017	78.6 MB/s
LG K10 2017	77.4 MB/s -2%
Huawei Y6 II Compact	31.57 MB/s -60%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL	17.7 MB/s -77%
Gigaset GS160	30.71 MB/s -61%
Lenovo K6	78.2 MB/s -1%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
LG K8 2017	52.2 MB/s
LG K10 2017	61.6 MB/s +18%
Huawei Y6 II Compact	17.12 MB/s -67%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL	14.4 MB/s -72%
Gigaset GS160	19.19 MB/s -63%
Lenovo K6	50.4 MB/s -3%

Max. Load

Idle


38.4 °C	36.2 °C	34.9 °C
36.5 °C	37.8 °C	34.5 °C
34.1 °C	33.3 °C	33.4 °C

Maximum: 38.4 °C
Average: 35.5 °C


29 °C	28.7 °C	37.5 °C
29.5 °C	29.8 °C	37.1 °C
28.9 °C	29.2 °C	32 °C

Maximum: 37.5 °C
Average: 31.3 °C

Power Supply (max.) 36.2 °C | Room Temperature 21.3 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.5 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.4 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.5 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.6 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

LG K8 2017 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 38.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 13.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (14.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (34.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 83% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 92% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Huawei Y6 II Compact audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 13.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (35.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 83% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 93% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0 / 0.1 Watt
Idle	0.65 / 1.6 / 1.62 Watt
Load	2.97 / 4.34 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	LG K8 2017 2500 mAh	LG K10 2017 2800 mAh	Huawei Y6 II Compact 2200 mAh	Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL 2600 mAh	Gigaset GS160 2500 mAh	Lenovo K6 3000 mAh
Power Consumption		-4%	-2%	-16%	-11%	-11%
Idle Minimum *	0.65	0.76 -17%	0.57 12%	0.92 -42%	0.56 14%	0.65 -0%
Idle Average *	1.6	1.59 1%	1.53 4%	1.76 -10%	1.7 -6%	1.65 -3%
Idle Maximum *	1.62	1.61 1%	1.6 1%	1.85 -14%	1.75 -8%	1.67 -3%
Load Average *	2.97	3.24 -9%	2.82 5%	3.47 -17%	4.17 -40%	3.58 -21%
Load Maximum *	4.34	4.15 4%	5.69 -31%	4.22 3%	5.07 -17%	5.58 -29%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing		9h 54min
Load (maximum brightness)		4h 40min

	LG K8 2017 2500 mAh	LG K10 2017 2800 mAh	Huawei Y6 II Compact 2200 mAh	Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL 2600 mAh	Gigaset GS160 2500 mAh	Lenovo K6 3000 mAh
Battery Runtime		-2%	-8%	-3%	-5%	23%
WiFi v1.3	594	532 -10%	623 5%	572 -4%	615 4%	715 20%
Load	280	298 6%	222 -21%	277 -1%	244 -13%	350 25%
Reader / Idle		1477	1175	1224	1326	1626
H.264		613	682	617	702	633

Pros

+ 外壳设计质量出色

+ 续航时间长且电池可更换

+ 低功耗

+ 支持NFC,USB-OTG

+ 最新Android 7

+ 通话质量出色

+ 合理的相机

+ 出色的控制

+ 高速存储

Cons

- 压力敏感

- 图形处理能力弱

- 长期负载下降频

- 自动对焦有问题

- 屏幕亮度不足

In the test: LG K8 (2017). Test unit provided by LG Germany.

如同先前的LG K10（2017），这家韩国厂商将LG K8（2017）打造成了一部提供了许多在这个价位的设备难以见到的特性的，有着不错品质的低端手机。首先，有着支持NFC以及当今蓝牙标准的硬件。但是，对于指纹识别的配备，你可能要失望了。作为替代，这台设备有着良好的通话质量以及相机，这对于这个价位的手机来说恰到好处。精准的输入设备，可更换的电池加上不错的续航都是这LG K8（2017）的优点，外壳也显得做工优秀。

你需要经常手工调整图像的对焦，因为对焦有一些小问题，而且屏幕上整体太暗了。扬声器表现在于同价位的平均水平之下，且这个水平本身就很低，且偏弱的图形性能很难对未来做出承诺。

有着看上去高品质的外壳，不错的相机，可更换的电池--对于那些不会被指纹识别的缺失以及较暗的屏幕吓跑的人们来说，这台这台LG K8（2017）是不错的选择。

任何人都可以接受得到一台质量过硬，而且看上去拥有高质量且与目前价格与屏幕以及成像质量没有什么改进，但是却拥有更加强劲的性能的 LG K10相比便宜将近五十欧元的廉价手机。只要这个巨大的价格差保持下去，并且你并不是很需要那些额外的性能的话，现在的LG K8 (2017)对你来说，无疑是一个好选择。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

LG K8 2017 - 04/19/2017 v6 ^(old)
Florian Wimmer

Chassis

81%

Keyboard

65 / 75 → 87%

Pointing Device

84%

Connectivity

37 / 60 → 61%

Weight

93%

Battery

92%

Display

82%

Games Performance

3 / 63 → 5%

Application Performance

37 / 70 → 52%

Temperature

91%

Noise

100%

Audio

56 / 91 → 61%

Camera

67%

Average

68%

79%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > LG K8 (2017) 智能手机简短评测

Florian Wimmer, 2017-05-14 (Update: 2017-05-14)

Size Comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

LG K8 2017 audio analysis

Huawei Y6 II Compact audio analysis

Pros

Cons

More articles related to this device

Price comparison