Notebookcheck Logo

戴尔 Latitude 14 Rugged 5414 笔记本电脑简短评测

坚韧。 这台来自戴尔的14寸笔记本电脑可以在最极端的环境中坚挺不倒。它明亮的IPS屏幕和惊人的97瓦时电池保证了可以跟随你辗转于各种不同的工作环境间。
AMD Business Laptop / Notebook Skylake Touchscreen Windows
Dell Latitude 14 Rugged 5414 (Latitude 14 Rugged Series)
Processor
Intel Core i5-6300U 2 x 2.4 - 3 GHz, Skylake
Graphics adapter
AMD Radeon R7 M360 - 2048 MB VRAM, Core: 980 MHz, RAM: 900 MHz, DDR3, 64位界面, Crimson 16.11.1 (21.19.160.257), Enduro
Memory
8 GB 
, DDR4-2134, 单通道, 两个内存槽 (一个已占用)
Display
14.00 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 157 PPI, 电容式,10点触控, AU Optronics B140HAN, IPS, glossy: no
Mainboard
Intel Skylake-U Premium PCH
Storage
Liteonit CV3-8D128, 128 GB 
, 80 GB free
Soundcard
Realtek ALC293 @ Intel Sunrise Point PCH - High Definition Audio Controller
Connections
1 Express Card 54mm, 2 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 VGA, 1 HDMI, 1 Serial Port, 1 Docking Station Port, Audio Connections: 整合音频接口, Card Reader: SD, 1 SmartCard, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 振动感应器
Networking
Intel Ethernet Connection I219-LM (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2, Dell Wireless 5809e Gobi 4G LTE, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 44.4 x 347 x 243
Battery
97 Wh, 8700 mAh Lithium-Ion, removeable, 11.1 V
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 高清
Additional features
Speakers: 立体声, Keyboard: 孤岛式, Keyboard Light: yes, 被动式手写笔, McAfee LiveSafe (试用版), MS Office 365 (试用版), 36 Months Warranty, ruggedized
Weight
2.95 kg, Power Supply: 442 g
Price
3100 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Dell Latitude 14 Rugged 5414
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260 (jseb)
669 MBit/s
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (jseb)
563 MBit/s -16%
Dell Latitude 14 3470
Atheros AR5BWB222 Wireless Network Adapter
165 MBit/s -75%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
92 MBit/s -86%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (jseb)
547 MBit/s +7%
Dell Latitude 14 Rugged 5414
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260 (jseb)
509 MBit/s
Dell Latitude 14 3470
Atheros AR5BWB222 Wireless Network Adapter
143 MBit/s -72%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
91 MBit/s -82%
1005
cd/m²
1009
cd/m²
992
cd/m²
1086
cd/m²
1152
cd/m²
1067
cd/m²
1069
cd/m²
1110
cd/m²
1110
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
AU Optronics B140HAN tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 1152 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1066.7 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 1152 cd/m²
Contrast: 1067:1 (Black: 1.08 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 10.04 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 10.47 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
63% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
35% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
38.48% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
55.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
37.23% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.42
Dell Latitude 14 Rugged 5414
IPS, 1920x1080, 14"
Dell Latitude 14 Rugged - 5404
TN, 1366x768, 14"
Bullman Dirtbook S12 Touch
IPS, 1280x800, 12.1"
Bullman C-Klasse S i7 15FHD Dirtbook
TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Display
-4%
-5%
60%
Display P3 Coverage
37.23
35.7
-4%
35.53
-5%
59.1
59%
sRGB Coverage
55.2
53.7
-3%
53.2
-4%
89.1
61%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
38.48
36.88
-4%
36.71
-5%
61.1
59%
Response Times
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
49 ?(17, 32)
Response Time Black / White *
36 ?(14, 22)
PWM Frequency
198 ?(90)
Screen
-40%
-3%
-15%
Brightness middle
1152
751
-35%
310
-73%
219
-81%
Brightness
1067
700
-34%
285
-73%
214
-80%
Brightness Distribution
86
84
-2%
85
-1%
89
3%
Black Level *
1.08
2.2
-104%
0.38
65%
0.42
61%
Contrast
1067
341
-68%
816
-24%
521
-51%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
10.04
13.47
-34%
5.81
42%
7.43
26%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
19.43
Greyscale dE 2000 *
10.47
14.48
-38%
4.68
55%
8.79
16%
Gamma
2.42 91%
2.86 77%
2.44 90%
2.28 96%
CCT
5576 117%
15544 42%
5764 113%
10750 60%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
35
34
-3%
33.7
-4%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
63
53
-16%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-22% / -30%
-4% / -4%
23% / 7%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 198 Hz ≤ 90 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 198 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 198 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8706 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14 ms rise
↘ 22 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 93 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
49 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17 ms rise
↘ 32 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 83 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
4728
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
10571
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
7342
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
125 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
308 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
35.64 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
98 %
Help
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Bullman C-Klasse S i7 15FHD Dirtbook
Intel Core i7-4810MQ
145 Points +16%
Dell Latitude 14 Rugged 5414
Intel Core i5-6300U
125 Points
Dell Latitude 14 E5470
Intel Core i5-6300U
124 Points -1%
HP EliteBook 820 G3
Intel Core i5-6300U
123 Points -2%
Dell Latitude 14 Rugged - 5404
Intel Core i5-4310U
114 Points -9%
Bullman Dirtbook S12 Touch
Intel Core i5-3337U
75 Points -40%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Bullman C-Klasse S i7 15FHD Dirtbook
Intel Core i7-4810MQ
623 Points +102%
Dell Latitude 14 E5470
Intel Core i5-6300U
311 Points +1%
HP EliteBook 820 G3
Intel Core i5-6300U
311 Points +1%
Dell Latitude 14 Rugged 5414
Intel Core i5-6300U
308 Points
Dell Latitude 14 Rugged - 5404
Intel Core i5-4310U
261 Points -15%
Bullman Dirtbook S12 Touch
Intel Core i5-3337U
187 Points -39%
Geekbench 3
32 Bit Single-Core Score
Bullman C-Klasse S i7 15FHD Dirtbook
Intel Core i7-4810MQ
3506 Points +27%
Dell Latitude 14 Rugged 5414
Intel Core i5-6300U
2758 Points
Bullman Dirtbook S12 Touch
Intel Core i5-3337U
1892 Points -31%
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
Bullman C-Klasse S i7 15FHD Dirtbook
Intel Core i7-4810MQ
11663 Points +91%
Dell Latitude 14 Rugged 5414
Intel Core i5-6300U
6093 Points
Bullman Dirtbook S12 Touch
Intel Core i5-3337U
4553 Points -25%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Dell Latitude 14 Rugged 5414
Intel Core i5-6300U
3547 Points
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Dell Latitude 14 Rugged 5414
Intel Core i5-6300U
6614 Points
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Dell Latitude 14 Rugged 5414
Intel Core i5-6300U
207.1 Points
HP EliteBook 820 G3
Intel Core i5-6300U
188 Points -9%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3507 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
4349 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4498 points
Help
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Dell Latitude 14 Rugged 5414
Radeon R7 M360, 6300U, Liteonit CV3-8D128
3507 Points
Bullman C-Klasse S i7 15FHD Dirtbook
HD Graphics 4600, 4810MQ, Samsung SSD 840 EVO 250GB
3244 Points -7%
Dell Latitude 14 Rugged - 5404
HD Graphics 4400, 4310U, Seagate Momentus Thin ST500LT012-1DG142
2221 Points -37%
Bullman Dirtbook S12 Touch
HD Graphics 4000, 3337U, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 250GB
2151 Points -39%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Dell Latitude 14 Rugged 5414
Radeon R7 M360, 6300U, Liteonit CV3-8D128
4498 Points
Bullman C-Klasse S i7 15FHD Dirtbook
HD Graphics 4600, 4810MQ, Samsung SSD 840 EVO 250GB
4338 Points -4%
Dell Latitude 14 Rugged - 5404
HD Graphics 4400, 4310U, Seagate Momentus Thin ST500LT012-1DG142
3354 Points -25%
Bullman Dirtbook S12 Touch
HD Graphics 4000, 3337U, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 250GB
3237 Points -28%
Liteonit CV3-8D128
Sequential Read: 487.7 MB/s
Sequential Write: 316.7 MB/s
512K Read: 351 MB/s
512K Write: 185.8 MB/s
4K Read: 27.72 MB/s
4K Write: 62.5 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 267.8 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 158.2 MB/s
Dell Latitude 14 Rugged 5414
Liteonit CV3-8D128
Dell Latitude 14 Rugged - 5404
Seagate Momentus Thin ST500LT012-1DG142
Bullman Dirtbook S12 Touch
Samsung SSD 850 EVO 250GB
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-91%
5%
Read Seq
487.7
91.4
-81%
278.3
-43%
Write Seq
316.7
86.7
-73%
267
-16%
Read 512
351
19.58
-94%
267.3
-24%
Write 512
185.8
32.59
-82%
264.2
42%
Read 4k
27.72
0.315
-99%
39.21
41%
Write 4k
62.5
0.56
-99%
79.4
27%
Read 4k QD32
267.8
0.668
-100%
214.7
-20%
Write 4k QD32
158.2
0.588
-100%
205.5
30%
3DMark 11 Performance
2156 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
47244 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
4920 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
1031 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
463 points
Help
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Dell Latitude 14 Rugged 5414
AMD Radeon R7 M360, Intel Core i5-6300U
2029 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad S510p 59-405717
NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M, Intel Core i5-4200U
1213 Points -40%
Bullman C-Klasse S i7 15FHD Dirtbook
Intel HD Graphics 4600, Intel Core i7-4810MQ
1176 Points -42%
Lenovo IdeaPad S500 Touch 59372927
NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M, Intel Core i5-3337U
962 Points -53%
Dell Latitude 14 Rugged - 5404
Intel HD Graphics 4400, Intel Core i5-4310U
706 Points -65%
Bullman Dirtbook S12 Touch
Intel HD Graphics 4000, Intel Core i5-3337U
522 Points -74%
lowmed.highultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 69.2 39.9 30.8 9.2
GTA V (2015) 51 43.1 10.1
Ashes of the Singularity (2016) 14.8 6.9 6.1
Doom (2016) 21.8 12 7.4
Mirror's Edge Catalyst (2016) 25.8 18.3 7.4
No Man's Sky (2016) 18.1 14.9 7.9
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) 13.6 9.9
FIFA 17 (2016) 90.7 71.7 37.1 34.3
Mafia 3 (2016) 14.2 9
Farming Simulator 17 (2016) 71.6 58.6 22.7 9.7
Titanfall 2 (2016) 41.8 31.5 11.5
Dishonored 2 (2016) 10.7 9

Noise Level

Idle
30.3 / 30.3 / 30.3 dB(A)
Load
30.4 / 32.8 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 30.14 dB(A)
Max. Load
 34 °C37.7 °C33.6 °C 
 35.3 °C34.3 °C32 °C 
 27.1 °C27.6 °C27.1 °C 
Maximum: 37.7 °C
Average: 32.1 °C
34.6 °C51 °C36.5 °C
32.9 °C37 °C37.2 °C
30 °C30.2 °C31.6 °C
Maximum: 51 °C
Average: 35.7 °C
Power Supply (max.)  40.1 °C | Room Temperature 21.6 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.1 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.7 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.3 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.6 °C / 81.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (0 °C / 0 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.231.533.22533.830.733.83132.635.632.64031.530.131.55031.827.231.86329.128.829.18028.326.928.310030263012537.824.937.816048.12348.120055.122.655.125054.321.554.33155220.85240063.719.963.750066.719.566.763069.518.769.580073.818.173.8100070.917.870.9125068.517.568.516006817.268200073.417.473.4250070.317.470.3315068.717.668.7400072.217.772.2500074.517.974.5630073.817.873.8800069.717.969.71000066.91866.91250066.717.866.71600060.917.860.9SPL83.230.183.2N57.51.457.5median 68median 17.9median 68Delta6.91.46.935.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.72.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseDell Latitude 14 Rugged 5414Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Dell Latitude 14 Rugged 5414 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.82 / 4.75 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 9.2 / 20.2 / 21.4 Watt
Load midlight 34.2 / 36 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 38)
9h 13min
Dell Latitude 14 Rugged 5414
6300U, Radeon R7 M360, 97 Wh
Dell Latitude 14 Rugged - 5404
4310U, HD Graphics 4400, 67 Wh
Bullman Dirtbook S12 Touch
3337U, HD Graphics 4000, 57 Wh
Bullman C-Klasse S i7 15FHD Dirtbook
4810MQ, HD Graphics 4600, 57 Wh
Battery Runtime
-64%
WiFi v1.3
553
197
-64%
WiFi
470
237

Pros

+ 坚固的机身
+ 非常明亮的IPS屏幕
+ 全高清分辨率
+ 出色的输入设备
+ 升级维护空间大
+ 运行安静
+ 高速固态硬盘
+ LTE模组

Cons

- 不支持如Thunderbolt 3,USB-C或DisplayPort等新一代接口
- 存储空间较小
- 出厂设定色彩还原较差
In review: Dell Latitude 14 Rugged 5414. Test model provided by Dell Germany
In review: Dell Latitude 14 Rugged 5414. Test model provided by Dell Germany

戴尔Latitude 14 5414是一台为极端环境下专业用途设计的一台14寸三防笔记本电脑。这台设备通过了多种工业标准测试。它也不算是一台全新设备,我们之前测试的戴尔 Latitude 14 5404也使用了同样的机身。它们在外观上只有很小的不同,而在内部组件上它更新到了Skylake架构处理器,以及一块可选的Radeon显卡。更现代的芯片可以帮助5414为用户带来相比前代机型更高的运算性能。值得庆幸的是,这台笔记本电脑并没有在电池续航和散热控制上做出妥协。相反,它提供了出色的电池续航时间,同时运行近乎安静。一块高速固态硬盘让系统性能不存在瓶颈。我们也很喜欢它的背光键盘,它带来了舒适的输入感受。测试机的磨砂IPS屏幕完全超越了前代机型的高清屏幕,不管是亮度还是对比度都无可挑剔,这让它可以轻松适应户外使用的需要。

戴尔Latitude 14 5414是一台配置完整、符合设计定位的设备。

不过这台Latitude也仍然有让我们不够满意的地方。作为一台售价数千欧元的设备,它在一些方面似乎有些落后于时代。我们期待它可以搭配容量更大的固态硬盘,128GB显得十分可怜。在内存上也是如此,16GB应该是可以接受的最低标准。戴尔也错过了更新接口配备的最佳时机,它需要提供对Thunderbolt 3,Displayport和USB-C的支持。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。 

Dell Latitude 14 Rugged 5414 - 11/10/2016 v5.1 (old)
Sascha Mölck

Chassis
93 / 98 → 95%
Keyboard
94%
Pointing Device
87%
Connectivity
64 / 80 → 80%
Weight
57 / 20-67 → 79%
Battery
92%
Display
83%
Games Performance
59 / 68 → 87%
Application Performance
82 / 92 → 90%
Temperature
89%
Noise
95%
Audio
63%
Camera
46 / 85 → 54%
Average
77%
88%
Office - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 戴尔 Latitude 14 Rugged 5414 笔记本电脑简短评测
Sascha Mölck, 2016-11-20 (Update: 2016-11-20)