Notebookcheck Logo

联想Legion Tab 评测--尽管采用了较老的 SoC,这款游戏平板电脑的性能如何?

游戏迟到者

联想利用其著名的Legion 笔记本电脑的名称,推出了一款主打游戏的小型平板电脑。联想Legion Tab 的目标是以其优化的散热、两个 USB-C 端口和较长的运行时间给人留下深刻印象。这款游戏平板电脑在游戏玩家的日常生活中表现如何?
Android ARM Tablet

在游戏掌机大获成功之后,便携式游戏平板电脑迟早会重新成为制造商关注的焦点。联想凭借其Legion 和 LOQ 笔记本电脑在游戏领域活跃已久,现在它正试图将触角伸向Android 游戏玩家。

为此,该制造商发布了联想Legion Tab(也称Legion Y700),该产品拥有良好的散热性能、不节流的 SoC 以及 144-Hz 高速显示屏。这款 8.8 英寸的平板电脑售价约为 650 美元,并不便宜。

联想平板电脑目前还没有面临太多竞争--无论是在同尺寸级别还是作为专用游戏平板电脑。

Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 8 x 1.8 - 3.2 GHz, Cortex-X2 / A710 / A510 (Kryo) Waipio
Graphics adapter
Memory
12 GB 
, DDR5X
Display
8.80 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 343 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS, HDR 10, Dolby Vision, glossy: yes, HDR, 144 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB 
, 210 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: audio via USB-C, Card Reader: microSDXC (dedicated, up to 1 TB), Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Acceleration sensor, Hall sensor, position sensor
Networking
Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.6 x 208.5 x 129.5
Battery
6550 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 68 Watt charging
Operating System
Android 14
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix flash, video@ 4K, 30fps (camera 1), 2 MP (camera 2)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix video @1080p, 30 fps
Additional features
folio case, USB cable, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
350 g
Price
599 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Version
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
86 %v8
08 / 2024
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730
350 g7.6 mm8.80"2560x1600
86.6 %
v7 (old)
v7 (old)
04 / 2024
Razer Edge
SD G3x Gen 1, Adreno 660
264 g10.8 mm6.80"2400x1080
90.7 %
v7 (old)
v7 (old)
10 / 2021
Apple iPad Mini 6
A15, A15 GPU 5-Core
297 g6.3 mm8.30"2266x1488
86.8 %
v7 (old)
v7 (old)
11 / 2023
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5
524 g6.5 mm10.90"2304x1440
89.1 %
v7 (old)
v7 (old)
09 / 2023
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14
SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730
750 g6.53 mm14.00"2880x1800

请注意:我们更新了评级系统,第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不可比。更多信息 请点击此处.

外壳 - 携带方便,质量上乘

就其占地面积而言,联想Legion Tab 最接近于 迷你但除此之外,市场上尺寸小于 10 英寸的平板电脑并不多。联想平板电脑的重量为 350 克,在同尺寸平板电脑中不算最轻,但你仍然可以舒适地长时间握持它。

屏幕周围的边框非常窄,因此你可能不得不面对触摸屏上不需要的奇怪输入。

它的灰色金属背面是哑光的,左角有一个闪亮的Legion 徽标。右侧是摄像头模块,突出于机壳之外,但如果把平板电脑放在桌上使用,它只会产生轻微的晃动。

平板电脑做工精良,没有吱吱作响的声音,用手指也感觉不到材料的过渡。

它没有 IP 认证,无法防尘防水。

尺寸比较

318.58 mm 206.1 mm 6.53 mm 750 g254.3 mm 165.8 mm 6.5 mm 524 g208.5 mm 129.5 mm 7.6 mm 350 g195.4 mm 134.8 mm 6.3 mm 297 g167.8 mm 84.5 mm 10.8 mm 264 g297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

连接性 - 两个 USB-C 端口

联想为其便携式平板电脑配备了 256 GB 存储空间和 12 GB 内存。其最高售价约为 650 美元,这个价格还算可以,因为你要花更多的钱买一台 迷你的价格要高得多。

这款平板电脑没有 5G 功能,也没有不同的存储配置可供选择。

有趣的是,联想为Legion Tab 配备了两个 USB-C 接口:机身长边的接口是一个 USB 3.2 接口,数据传输速率最高可达 10 GBit/s,同时还可作为 DisplayPort 用于图像输出。

短边的第二个端口是标准的 USB 2.0 接口,可能主要用于为设备充电。尽管如此,它还可用于与其他设备之间的数据传输,或连接控制器或鼠标等外设。

左:USB-C 3.2 端口
左:USB-C 3.2 端口
右侧:音量摇杆、待机键、2 个麦克风
右侧:音量摇杆、待机键、2 个麦克风
底部:扬声器、USB-C 2.0 端口
底部:扬声器、USB-C 2.0 端口
首页: 扬声器
首页: 扬声器

microSD 读卡器

Legion Tab 外形小巧,甚至还配备了一个 microSD 读卡器,因此可以通过使用合适的存储卡来扩展数据存储空间并方便数据交换。

在我们使用参考 microSD 卡 Angelbird V60 进行的测试中,读卡器的速度一般,因此使用时需要一点耐心。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
58.36 MB/s +124%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash (Angelbird V60)
26.1 MB/s
Razer Edge
Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
14.34 MB/s -45%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707580859095Tooltip
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø21.1 (13.4-43.7)
Razer Edge Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø24 (14.4-50.6)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø41.3 (30.1-58)
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø57.8 (30.2-66.2)
Razer Edge Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø70.7 (31-81.2)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø74.7 (43.8-97.8)

可持续性

联想已计算出该平板电脑在生命周期内产生的二氧化碳当量排放量,供客户阅读。显然,联想Legion Tab 的二氧化碳排放量为 63 千克,其中约 70% (45 千克)来自生产过程。联想Legion Tab 的包装也不含塑料。

不过,在平板电脑的材料和可修复性方面,联想还没有做出任何特别的努力来确保更好的可持续性。

软件 -Android 14 通过更新

起初,这款平板电脑搭载的是Android 13,因为它已于去年进入中国市场。与此同时,Android 14 已经上市,在首次启动设备时,它会安装多个更新。

我们测试设备的最新安全补丁是从 2024 年 6 月开始的,因此在测试时,它们仍然是相对最新的。联想的目标是在 2028 年 2 月之前提供安全更新。您应该还能期待一两次Android 版本更新,但这只是基于我们与制造商的合作经验,联想本身并没有做出任何官方承诺。

联想适配的Android 版本名为 "联想 ZUI 16",乍一看变化不大。不过,它的一些高级功能可能会引起用户的兴趣:当然,游戏模式对于游戏平板电脑来说非常重要--在该机型上,它被称为 "游戏助手",可以在玩游戏时通过屏幕左侧调用。此外,你还可以更改平板电脑的通知和性能设置。

系统还能自动优化第三方应用程序,以便进行多任务处理。不过,在我们的测试过程中,重要的应用程序控制偶尔会消失,这意味着该功能并不总是能达到最佳效果。

通信 -Legion 标签上的快速无线局域网

如前所述,这款平板电脑不支持蜂窝网络连接,尽管体积小巧便于携带,但Legion Tab 也没有 NFC 功能,因此无法使用无线支付程序。

WiFi 6E 是快速可用的无线局域网标准,这意味着只要有合适的路由器,不太繁忙的 6 GHz 网络也能用于 Wi-Fi 网络。在我们使用华硕 ROG Rapture AXE11000 参考路由器进行的测试中,这款平板电脑以其较高的接收速度获得了分数。该平板电脑可充分利用千兆互联网线路,其全速约为 1,581 MBit/s,确保在连接到家庭网络时传输速度更快。

只有在发送数据时,速度才会明显下降,在某些情况下甚至远低于对比设备的水平。

我们还测试了 WLAN 模块的信号强度。我们注意到,在靠近路由器的地方没有问题,而在 10 米远的地方,中间有 3 面墙,信号强度约为 60%,大型网站的加载速度仍然很快。

Networking
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
691 (min: 606) MBit/s ∼47%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1581 (min: 1497) MBit/s ∼100%
Razer Edge
Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
908 (min: 397) MBit/s ∼95%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
801 (min: 371) MBit/s ∼85%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1480 (min: 1022) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1448 (min: 1324) MBit/s ∼92%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
847 (min: 791) MBit/s ∼89%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
795 (min: 342) MBit/s ∼84%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
957 (min: 890) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
946 (min: 488) MBit/s ∼100%
08517025534042551059568076585093510201105119012751360144515301615Tooltip
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø691 (606-873)
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1581 (1497-1620)

摄像头 - 支持 4K 视频录制

使用前置摄像头拍摄的照片
使用前置摄像头拍摄的照片

由于联想Legion Tab 非常便携,你可能会认为它还可以用来拍摄照片和视频。一般来说,这样做绝对没问题--背面甚至有两个相机镜头,其中一个不能用来拍照,只能用来支持虚化效果。

因此只剩下主摄像头,分辨率为 1300 万像素,在我们的测试中拍摄出了不错的照片。即便如此,照片看起来还是有些苍白,对比度不够。在低照度条件下的高竞赛中,蜡烛照片上的火焰曝光过度,在较暗的区域几乎无法辨认出任何东西。在这种情况下,它的清晰度一般。

您最多只能以 30fps 的速度录制视频,但至少可以录制 4K 视频。事实上,录制的视频质量不错--自动对焦反应迅速,即使在弱光环境下,图像清晰度也还可以。

平板电脑正面屏幕上方有一个 800 万像素的自拍摄像头。它能拍摄出清晰度不错的照片。在光线很强或很暗的地方,你不应该期望能识别出太多细节。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera plantMain camera surroundingsMain camera low light

我们在摄影实验室测试了主摄像头。在这里,所有设备都设置了相同的不同照明场景。

我们从全摄影棚照明开始。乍一看,测试图的照片其实还不错,但仔细观察,你会发现很多细节都很模糊。在光线非常暗的情况下,相机已经无法识别任何东西了。

ColorChecker
3.9 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
2 ∆E
2.1 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
1.3 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
9 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC: 5.82 ∆E min: 1.34 - max: 12.81 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.6 ∆E
55.1 ∆E
39.8 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
45.6 ∆E
62.4 ∆E
53.7 ∆E
36.1 ∆E
44.2 ∆E
29 ∆E
65.1 ∆E
64.1 ∆E
31.5 ∆E
47.7 ∆E
37.8 ∆E
76.8 ∆E
44.6 ∆E
42 ∆E
94.3 ∆E
71.4 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC: 47.17 ∆E min: 13.35 - max: 94.33 ∆E

配件和保修 - 不含充电器

配备对开式保护套的联想Legion Tab
配备对开式保护套的联想Legion Tab

联想没有随设备提供充电器,但提供了一条 USB 线、一个打开 microSD 插槽的工具和一个对开式保护套。你可以直接从联想购买相应的充电器,但也可以使用支持 Power Delivery 的其他充电器。

如果在美国购买,该平板电脑享有 12 个月的标准保修服务。

输入设备和操作 - 无指纹传感器

显示屏的刷新率高达 144 Hz,对输入的反应速度超快,在我们测试的整个过程中,触摸屏都能准确无误地工作。

你可以很容易地摸到外壳上的硬件按键,它们都有明确的按压点。待机键略有棱纹,因此可以很好地辨别。

这款平板电脑没有配备指纹传感器,但用户可以使用面部识别作为生物识别方法来解锁设备。在光线充足的条件下,面部识别的工作速度相当快,不会出现任何问题。

遗憾的是,它的面部识别功能没有深度传感器,因此在技术上可以通过使用照片来覆盖它。因此,一些安全性要求较高的应用程序不允许将面部识别作为生物识别方法。

直立式键盘
直立式键盘
水平键盘
水平键盘

显示屏 - 无 PWM 的 IPS 屏幕

子像素阵列
子像素阵列

IPS 屏幕直径为 8.8 英寸,宽高比为 16:10。分辨率为 2,560 x 1,600 像素,分辨率较高,可以在平板电脑相对较小的屏幕上清晰地显示内容。

它的最大屏幕亮度为 472 cd/m²,与同类平板电脑处于同一水平,但并不突出。它的亮度分布有些不均匀,在观察大而均匀的表面时,肉眼可以看到亮度的细微差别。不过,这在日常使用中应该不成问题。

它的黑色值相对较高,这意味着在高亮度下黑色区域看起来更像灰色,而且对比度较差。

372
cd/m²
428
cd/m²
472
cd/m²
376
cd/m²
443
cd/m²
465
cd/m²
364
cd/m²
401
cd/m²
466
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 472 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 420.8 cd/m² Minimum: 4 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 77 %
Center on Battery: 443 cd/m²
Contrast: 738:1 (Black: 0.6 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
94.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.166
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
IPS, 2560x1600, 8.8"
Razer Edge
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.8"
Apple iPad Mini 6
IPS, 2266x1488, 8.3"
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
TFT-LCD, 2304x1440, 10.9"
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14
IPS LCD, 2880x1800, 14"
Screen
-53%
21%
16%
33%
Brightness middle
443
449
1%
453
2%
694
57%
630
42%
Brightness
421
445
6%
440
5%
695
65%
591
40%
Brightness Distribution
77
95
23%
94
22%
88
14%
85
10%
Black Level *
0.6
0.4
33%
0.66
-10%
0.82
-37%
Contrast
738
1133
54%
1052
43%
768
4%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.3
4.8
-109%
1.52
34%
2.1
9%
0.6
74%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.75
8.1
-116%
3.28
13%
4.3
-15%
1
73%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.5
5.5
-120%
2.3
8%
3.3
-32%
1
60%
Gamma
2.166 102%
2.24 98%
2.26 97%
2.26 97%
2.2 100%
CCT
7086 92%
7538 86%
6900 94%
7010 93%
6624 98%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

总而言之,显示屏的色彩还算不错,肉眼只能看到色彩空间最佳值的极小偏差。

我们没有注意到任何 PWM 闪烁。它的响应时间略微偏慢,这对于铁杆游戏玩家来说可能是个问题。

卡尔曼灰度
卡尔曼灰度
CalMAN 色彩精度
CalMAN 色彩精度
CalMAN 饱和度
CalMAN 饱和度
CalMAN sRGB 色彩空间
CalMAN sRGB 色彩空间
CalMAN AdobeRGB 色彩空间
CalMAN AdobeRGB 色彩空间
CalMAN DCI P3 色彩空间
CalMAN DCI P3 色彩空间

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
18.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9.4 ms rise
↘ 8.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 37 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
28.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 15.3 ms rise
↘ 13.3 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 34 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

在室外,屏幕在明亮的环境下会有很差的反光,而这是相当暗淡的显示屏难以比拟的。在阴暗处使用该设备要舒适得多。

我们在观察其色彩偏差时注意到了一些轻微的色彩偏移,但总体而言,从侧面观看仍能很好地识别画面。

室外使用
室外使用
视角
视角

性能 - 快速玩家

乍一看,制造商决定采用 高通 Snapdragon 8+ Gen1似乎有点奇怪:既然有很多更先进的替代品,联想为什么还要选择 2022 年的 SoC 来驱动指定的游戏平板电脑呢?

首先,联想Legion Tab 早在 2023 年就在中国发布了,当时的名称是联想Legion Y700。联想自己也表示,它一直在寻找一款易于散热、不节流的 SoC。

与同等价格或类似设计的平板电脑相比,联想Legion Tab 在我们的基准测试中表现并不差,即使它使用的是较老的 SoC。它有足够的能力运行绝大多数应用程序。

Geekbench 6.3
Multi-Core
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
4761 Points
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14
4690 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4140 - 4761, n=7)
4493 Points -6%
Razer Edge
3757 Points -21%
Average of class Tablet (493 - 14690, n=68, last 2 years)
3518 Points -26%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
2858 Points -40%
Single-Core
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
1854 Points
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14
1798 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (1530 - 1854, n=7)
1735 Points -6%
Razer Edge
1596 Points -14%
Average of class Tablet (185 - 3715, n=68, last 2 years)
1093 Points -41%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
1011 Points -45%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Apple iPad Mini 6
1590 Points +19%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14
1389 Points +4%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
1334 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (897 - 1389, n=25)
1281 Points -4%
Razer Edge
1170 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
778 Points -42%
Average of class Tablet (140 - 1887, n=71, last 2 years)
707 Points -47%
Multi-Core
Apple iPad Mini 6
4640 Points +11%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14
4367 Points +4%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
4194 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (3782 - 4436, n=25)
4167 Points -1%
Razer Edge
3553 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
2728 Points -35%
Average of class Tablet (312 - 8624, n=71, last 2 years)
2496 Points -40%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
1341049 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (1162599 - 1341049, n=3)
1270622 Points -5%
Average of class Tablet (164396 - 2716980, n=36, last 2 years)
759506 Points -43%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
573936 Points -57%
Razer Edge
Points -100%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
1085887 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (782013 - 1119358, n=23)
997431 Points -8%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14
950385 Points -12%
Apple iPad Mini 6
774680 Points -29%
Razer Edge
740704 Points -32%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
505141 Points -53%
Average of class Tablet (92766 - 1286774, n=49, last 2 years)
464403 Points -57%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
20841 Points
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14
16584 Points -20%
Razer Edge
16261 Points -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (11029 - 20841, n=24)
15090 Points -28%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
11259 Points -46%
Average of class Tablet (3195 - 20841, n=73, last 2 years)
9812 Points -53%
CrossMark - Overall
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14
1098 Points +6%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
1036 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (749 - 1178, n=23)
1033 Points 0%
Razer Edge
987 Points -5%
Average of class Tablet (172 - 1944, n=63, last 2 years)
772 Points -25%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
673 Points -35%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14
7589 Points +27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (5642 - 8753, n=23)
7450 Points +25%
Razer Edge
6797 Points +14%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
5953 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
4424 Points -26%
Average of class Tablet (444 - 11721, n=59, last 2 years)
4210 Points -29%
System
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14
12132 Points +32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (8750 - 13563, n=23)
11726 Points +28%
Razer Edge
11334 Points +24%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
9163 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
9016 Points -2%
Average of class Tablet (1103 - 16435, n=59, last 2 years)
7279 Points -21%
Memory
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14
8726 Points +48%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (3871 - 9114, n=23)
7492 Points +27%
Razer Edge
7081 Points +20%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
5897 Points
Average of class Tablet (916 - 10977, n=59, last 2 years)
4874 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
4486 Points -24%
Graphics
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (16194 - 26660, n=23)
21146 Points +31%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14
19973 Points +23%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
16194 Points
Razer Edge
15906 Points -2%
Average of class Tablet (580 - 57192, n=59, last 2 years)
9171 Points -43%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
7031 Points -57%
Web
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (1198 - 2006, n=23)
1699 Points +18%
Razer Edge
1672 Points +17%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14
1574 Points +10%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
1435 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
1347 Points -6%
Average of class Tablet (10 - 2051, n=59, last 2 years)
1269 Points -12%
AImark - Score v3.x
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (887 - 147801, n=11)
37778 Points +2854%
Average of class Tablet (84 - 156427, n=51, last 2 years)
7152 Points +459%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14
1283 Points 0%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
1279 Points
Razer Edge
889 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
636 Points -50%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (3291 - 84787, n=21)
43831 Points +213%
Razer Edge
18822 Points +34%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
14014 Points
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14
13748 Points -2%
Average of class Tablet (1662 - 74821, n=57, last 2 years)
11329 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
6110 Points -56%
Geekbench ML
0.6 TensorFlow Lite NNAPI
Razer Edge
834 Points +72%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
485 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 ()
485 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet (112 - 834, n=6, last 2 years)
380 Points -22%
0.6 TensorFlow Lite GPU
Average of class Tablet (66 - 6806, n=8, last 2 years)
1160 Points +48%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
785 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 ()
785 Points 0%
Razer Edge
645 Points -18%
0.6 TensorFlow Lite CPU
Average of class Tablet (137 - 4617, n=8, last 2 years)
1014 Points +26%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
802 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 ()
802 Points 0%
Razer Edge
670 Points -16%

Legend

 
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
 
Razer Edge Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 660, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
 
Apple iPad Mini 6 Apple A15 Bionic, Apple A15 GPU 5-Core, 64 GB SSD
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Samsung Exynos 1380, ARM Mali-G68 MP5, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
 
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

在基准测试中,GPU 也证明了其强大的性能,在 GFXBench Aztec Ruins 4K 测试中甚至超过了 20fps。这意味着该平板电脑即使在高分辨率下也能流畅渲染。

虽然它还不支持光线追踪等最新功能,但在手机游戏中几乎找不到这些功能。即便如此,如果这些功能在未来对你来说变得更加重要,那么你应该知道联想 Tab 在这种情况下是错误的选择。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3001 Points +9%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2749 Points
Apple iPad Mini 6
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
2625 Points -5%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2463 Points -10%
Razer Edge
Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1446 Points -47%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Apple iPad Mini 6
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
2870 Points +2%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2806 Points
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2488 Points -11%
Razer Edge
Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1526 Points -46%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
838 Points -70%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11002 Points
Apple iPad Mini 6
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
10919 Points -1%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9785 Points -11%
Razer Edge
Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5750 Points -48%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2987 Points -73%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Apple iPad Mini 6
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
9498 Points
Razer Edge
Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5817 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2958 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
12785 Points
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11937 Points -7%
Razer Edge
Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9182 Points -28%
Apple iPad Mini 6
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
6175 Points -52%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5013 Points -61%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
19840 Points
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
17683 Points -11%
Apple iPad Mini 6
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
13133 Points -34%
Razer Edge
Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11965 Points -40%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5233 Points -74%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5696 Points
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5647 Points -1%
Razer Edge
Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5062 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4369 Points -23%
Apple iPad Mini 6
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
2163 Points -62%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Razer Edge
Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
144 fps +20%
Razer Edge
Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
144 fps +20%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
82 fps -32%
Apple iPad Mini 6
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
60 fps -50%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
450 fps
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
447 fps -1%
Apple iPad Mini 6
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
439.6 fps -2%
Razer Edge
Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
257 fps -43%
Razer Edge
Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
257 fps -43%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
120 fps -73%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Razer Edge
Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
122 fps +3%
Razer Edge
Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
122 fps +3%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
116 fps -3%
Apple iPad Mini 6
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
60 fps -50%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
58 fps -51%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
269 fps
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
265 fps -1%
Apple iPad Mini 6
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
237 fps -12%
Razer Edge
Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
144 fps -46%
Razer Edge
Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
144 fps -46%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
79 fps -71%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
104 fps
Razer Edge
Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
95 fps -9%
Razer Edge
Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
95 fps -9%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
77 fps -26%
Apple iPad Mini 6
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
60 fps -42%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
35 fps -66%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
182 fps
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
175 fps -4%
Apple iPad Mini 6
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
154.2 fps -15%
Razer Edge
Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
107 fps -41%
Razer Edge
Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
107 fps -41%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
53 fps -71%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58 fps
Apple iPad Mini 6
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
57.6 fps -1%
Razer Edge
Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56 fps -3%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
43 fps -26%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
21 fps -64%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
103 fps
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
102 fps -1%
Apple iPad Mini 6
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
99.2 fps -4%
Razer Edge
Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
65 fps -37%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
31 fps -70%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad Mini 6
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
51.8 fps +18%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 fps
Razer Edge
Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
40 fps -9%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
34 fps -23%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps -64%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
46 fps
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
45 fps -2%
Apple iPad Mini 6
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
41.2 fps -10%
Razer Edge
Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
28 fps -39%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps -70%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
72 fps
Razer Edge
Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
65 fps -10%
Apple iPad Mini 6
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
59.6 fps -17%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
51 fps -29%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
24 fps -67%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
124 fps
Apple iPad Mini 6
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
116.1 fps -6%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
115 fps -7%
Razer Edge
Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
78 fps -37%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
35 fps -72%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
21 fps 0%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
21 fps
Razer Edge
Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13 fps -38%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6 fps -71%

在浏览器基准测试和实际使用中,联想Legion Tab 的速度也非常快,在滚动时就能快速加载网站和已显示的图片。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC (Chrome 127)
204.072 Points
Apple iPad Mini 6 (Safari 15)
173.5 Points -15%
Razer Edge (Chrome 123)
156.36 Points -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (76.2 - 204, n=23)
125.2 Points -39%
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=69, last 2 years)
108.7 Points -47%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 (Mi Browser V14)
105.645 Points -48%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE (Chrome 119)
102.6 Points -50%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Razer Edge (Chrome 123)
163 Points +13%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC (Chrome 127)
144 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (69 - 159, n=21)
113.9 Points -21%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE (Chrome 119)
107 Points -26%
Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=68, last 2 years)
104.3 Points -28%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 (Mi Browser V14)
99 Points -31%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPad Mini 6 (Safari 15)
228 runs/min +16%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC (Chrome 127)
196 runs/min
Razer Edge (Chrome 123)
180 runs/min -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (69.1 - 196, n=18)
119.6 runs/min -39%
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=63, last 2 years)
115.5 runs/min -41%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE (Chrome 119)
80.1 runs/min -59%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC (Chrome 127)
61536 Points
Apple iPad Mini 6 (Safari 15)
57143 Points -7%
Razer Edge (Chrome 123)
53177 Points -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (17622 - 61536, n=24)
42193 Points -31%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 (Mi Browser V14)
40762 Points -34%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE (Chrome 119)
34739 Points -44%
Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=86, last 2 years)
28653 Points -53%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=74, last 2 years)
3789 ms * -470%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE (Chrome 119)
1208.7 ms * -82%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 (Mi Browser V14)
1121.3 ms * -69%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (665 - 1707, n=22)
1023 ms * -54%
Razer Edge (Chrome 123)
776.2 ms * -17%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC (Chrome 127)
665.3 ms *
Apple iPad Mini 6 (Safari 15)
455.1 ms * +32%
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Average of class Tablet (1.25 - 33.7, n=24, last 2 years)
12.8 runs/min +13%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC (Chrome 127)
11.3 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (10.9 - 11.3, n=2)
11.1 runs/min -2%
Razer Edge (Chrome 123)
9.93 runs/min -12%

* ... smaller is better

UFS 3.1 存储在目前的顶级智能手机中已经过时,但联想Legion Tab 的速度在同类产品中仍然相当快。该存储的加载时间短、数据传输快,在实际使用中同样令人印象深刻。

Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FCRazer EdgeSamsung Galaxy Tab S9 FEXiaomi Pad 6 Max 14Average 256 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
-33%
-67%
14%
-15%
-48%
Sequential Read 256KB
1650.8
1442.83
-13%
526.65
-68%
1983.47
20%
Sequential Write 256KB
1532.4
692.3
-55%
282.47
-82%
1873.45
22%
1163 ?(452 - 2004, n=101)
-24%
Random Read 4KB
346.9
264.67
-24%
225.02
-35%
374.54
8%
Random Write 4KB
416.4
252.12
-39%
68.78
-83%
446.71
7%

游戏 - 甚至可以达到 90fps

当然,游戏应该是联想Legion Tab 的核心竞争力。事实上,制造商在这方面已经做了很多努力:在测试过程中,我们只注意到运行《PUBG Mobile》时超高清设置下的帧数低于 60fps。不过,在非常低的设置下,玩这款游戏时甚至可以达到非常稳定的 90fps。

玄心冲击》即使在非常高的细节下也能达到 60fps 的流畅速度。因此,在联想Legion Tab 上进行流畅和反应灵敏的游戏没有任何障碍。

我们使用GameBench软件进行测量。

源泉冲击
源泉冲击
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps: Ø59.6 (51-60)
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps: Ø59.4 (49-60)
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø89.2 (84-91)
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø40 (39-40)

排放 - 负载时不节流

温度

我们测量到,在长时间高负荷工作的情况下,平板电脑外部的发热温度最高可达 49.9 °C。这已经非常明显,而且在环境温度较高时可能会更高。

不过,联想信守承诺,为 SoC 进行了高效散热,即使多次重复进行 3DMark 基准测试,帧速率也没有明显下降。因此,该系统能够保持其性能。

Max. Load
 45.7 °C42.3 °C39.2 °C 
 47.8 °C44.5 °C39.2 °C 
 48.7 °C45.4 °C39.2 °C 
Maximum: 48.7 °C
Average: 43.6 °C
39.5 °C44.5 °C45.4 °C
40 °C44.8 °C48.4 °C
39.8 °C44.9 °C49.9 °C
Maximum: 49.9 °C
Average: 44.1 °C
Power Supply (max.)  45.6 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 43.6 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.7 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49.9 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 33.3 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.1 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø63 (62.4-63.3)
Razer Edge Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø30.2 (26.7-34.8)
Apple iPad Mini 6 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø51 (49.9-56.9)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø17.7 (17.6-17.9)
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø56.1 (55.9-56.5)
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø16.7 (16.6-16.8)
Razer Edge Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø8.07 (7.68-9.12)
Apple iPad Mini 6 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 0.0.0.0: Ø14.5 (14.1-17.2)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø5.05 (5.03-5.07)
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø14.7 (14.7-14.8)
Razer Edge Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø30.7 (27.8-35.1)
3DMark
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14
99.6 (14.7min - 14.8max) % 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
99.3 (5.03min - 5.07max) % 0%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
99.2 (16.6min - 16.8max) %
Razer Edge
84.2 (7.68min - 9.12max) % -15%
Apple iPad Mini 6
82.3 (14.1min - 17.2max) % -17%
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14
99 (55.9min - 56.5max) % 0%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
98.7 (62.4min - 63.3max) %
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
98.4 (17.6min - 17.9max) % 0%
Apple iPad Mini 6
87.8 (49.9min - 56.9max) % -11%
Razer Edge
76.9 (26.7min - 34.8max) % -22%
Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability
Razer Edge
79.2 (27.8min - 35.1max) %

Legend

 
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
 
Razer Edge Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 660, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
 
Apple iPad Mini 6 Apple A15 Bionic, Apple A15 GPU 5-Core, 64 GB SSD
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Samsung Exynos 1380, ARM Mali-G68 MP5, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
 
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
热图返回
热图返回
热图返回
热图返回

发言人

立体声扬声器安装在平板电脑的短边。它们能发出非常好的声音,如果需要,音量可高达 82 dB(A)。低频清晰可闻,声音温暖饱满。即使在最大音量下,扬声器也不会使声音失真。

外置扬声器或耳机可通过 USB-C 或蓝牙连接。无线声音传输有多种编解码器可供选择:SBC、AAC、LDAC、aptX、aptX HD、LC3 和 Opus。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.637.22538.236.23129.227.54031.233.4503941.46324.524.48018.728.310023.339.512517.343.616014.74920010.451.825012.553.331512.357.44009.66350010.165.963013.4668001366.9100015.573125010.672.5160010.375.3200010.769250011.265.4315013.167.8400013.662.9500014.666.6630014.470.1800015.469.91000016.372.71250016.367.4160001757.2SPL25.682N0.753.2median 13.4median 66Delta2.36.929.532.533.134.327.425.631.329.830.33229.62724.123.220.732.117.641.914.847.412.348.812.852.410.454.1956.711.361.314.460.617.163.41465.610.461.59.456.710.657.911.459.613.661.413.766.615.365.815.465.616.661.417.65617.355.517.64826.374.70.735.3median 14median 57.93.15.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLenovo Legion Tab TB320FCApple iPad Mini 6
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple iPad Mini 6 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 35% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理 - 日常使用的良好运行时间

耗电量

尽管性能不俗,联想Legion Tab并不需要那么多电量:在空闲模式下已经相当省电,在满载模式下也是如此,我们测得的功率为 7.9 瓦。

电池的最大充电功率为 68 瓦。充满电需要 1 个半小时。如果使用较慢的充电器,充电时间会稍长一些,但这对电池来说更温和。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.2 / 0.3 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.9 / 1.3 / 1.6 Watt
Load midlight 4.6 / 7.9 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
6550 mAh
Razer Edge
5000 mAh
Apple iPad Mini 6
5177 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
8000 mAh
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14
10000 mAh
Power Consumption
-55%
-69%
-164%
-302%
Idle Minimum *
0.9
1.2
-33%
1.1
-22%
1.13
-26%
2.57
-186%
Idle Average *
1.3
1.33
-2%
2.2
-69%
4.81
-270%
8.65
-565%
Idle Maximum *
1.6
1.37
14%
4.2
-163%
4.89
-206%
8.71
-444%
Load Average *
4.6
12.16
-164%
6.7
-46%
15.02
-227%
14.98
-226%
Load Maximum *
7.9
15.14
-92%
11.4
-44%
15.22
-93%
14.99
-90%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789Tooltip
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC: Ø4.81 (0.917-9.34)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

012345678Tooltip
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø7.87 (7.75-8.07)
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.984 (0.887-1.19)

运行时间

Legion Tab 的电池容量为 6,550 毫安时,性能相当强劲。这确保了良好的运行时间:使用 Wi-Fi 上网时,15:42 小时的续航时间足以让你在雨天躺在沙发上使用这款平板电脑。不过,在观看电影时,它的续航时间几乎没有延长:在我们的测试中,这款平板电脑的运行时间为 15:46 小时,因此您通常也可以观看一季您最喜爱的连续剧。

在负载情况下,也就是玩游戏时,运行时间约为 4 小时。这是一个相当不错的数值,因此您不必在完成游戏的每个关卡后立即寻找电源插座。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
34h 16min
WiFi Websurfing
15h 42min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
15h 46min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 08min
Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC
6550 mAh
Razer Edge
5000 mAh
Apple iPad Mini 6
5177 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
8000 mAh
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14
10000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-43%
-15%
-7%
-5%
Reader / Idle
2056
1802
-12%
H.264
946
903
-5%
WiFi v1.3
942
533
-43%
816
-13%
872
-7%
898
-5%
Load
248
179
-28%

Pros

+ 结构紧凑
+ 高品质外壳,时尚设计
+ 性能卓越
+ 玩游戏时帧率高且稳定
+ 流畅的运行时间
+ 强大的立体声扬声器
+ 可录制 4K 视频
+ 高速无线局域网
+ 两个 USB 端口
+ ...其中一个支持 DisplayPort

Cons

- 屏幕反应稍慢
- 没有手机型号
- 相机照片有时模糊
- 不支持光线追踪
- 无指纹传感器

评语 - 不仅适合游戏玩家的便捷平板电脑

联想Legion Tab 评测
联想Legion Tab 评测

联想Legion Tab 的尺寸本身就很吸引那些正在寻找功能强大、体积小巧的平板电脑的用户:除了 迷你之外,市场上几乎没有其他产品。

是的,联想 骁龙 8+Gen1可能不是最先进的 SoC,但反过来说,它能在较长时间内保持功率稳定,在运行应用程序和游戏时确实非常强大。不过,你必须考虑到平板电脑在持续负载情况下的发热问题。

尽管平板电脑尺寸小巧便携,但并不最适合户外使用,因为它的屏幕并不是最亮的。值得庆幸的是,我们没有发现 PWM 闪烁现象,这意味着即使是敏感的用户也能正常使用这款显示屏。

它的电池续航时间不错,无线局域网速度很快,机身稳定,甚至还有一个 microSD 读卡器。它的两个 USB-C 端口超级实用,可以让你在连接配件的同时保持平板电脑与电源的连接。

联想Legion Tab 是一款功能强大的游戏平板电脑,由于其便携的尺寸和时尚的外观,非游戏玩家也会对它感兴趣。

如果你喜欢使用 iPadOS,那么你应该看看 iPad Mini 6它同样功能强大,甚至比联想Legion Tab 更便宜(存储空间更小)。雷蛇 Razer Edge价格更低,但体积更小。

价格和供应情况

在撰写本文时,联想Legion Tab 尚未在美国发售。您可以通过联想网站直接查看制造商目前提供的所有设备。

请注意:我们更新了评级系统,第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不可比。更多信息 请点击此处.

Lenovo Legion Tab TB320FC - 08/14/2024 v8
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
84 / 98 → 86%
Keyboard
73 / 80 → 91%
Pointing Device
96%
Connectivity
47 / 69 → 68%
Weight
86 / 40-88 → 95%
Battery
90%
Display
80%
Games Performance
43 / 65 → 66%
Application Performance
73 / 92 → 79%
AI Performance
43%
Temperature
83%
Noise
100%
Audio
82 / 91 → 90%
Camera
59 / 90 → 66%
Average
68%
86%
Tablet - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
89.2%
Materials
10%
Packaging
75%
Power Use
93.2%
Repairability
6%
Software Updates
60%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 55.6%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 联想Legion Tab 评测--尽管采用了较老的 SoC,这款游戏平板电脑的性能如何?
Florian Schmitt, 2024-08-16 (Update: 2024-08-16)