Razer Edge 评测--可变身为游戏掌上电脑的小型平板电脑
游戏专家 Razer 通过 Edge 平板电脑提供了一种相对实惠的掌上设备，其目标用户不仅是那些喜欢Android 游戏的用户，还包括借助 Steam Link、GeForce Now 和其他流媒体解决方案的要求更高的人群。
实际上，Razer Edge 更像是一个小巧的平板电脑，可以通过附带的 Kishi V2 Pro 控制器变身为掌上电脑。Razer 将仅 Wi-Fi 版的零售价定为大约 500 欧元（400 美元），而 5G 版仅在美国销售。在撰写这篇评论时，价格已经大幅下降，这使得 Razer 平板电脑成为一个极具吸引力的选择。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 86.6 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2024 | Razer Edge SD G3x Gen 1, Adreno 660 | 264 g | 10.8 mm | 6.80" | 2400x1080 | |
| 85.2 % v7 (old) | 01 / 2024 | Ayaneo Kun R7 7840U, Radeon 780M | 942 g | 22 mm | 8.40" | 2560x1600 | |
| 84.9 % v7 (old) | 01 / 2024 | Lenovo Legion Go Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M | 845 g | 41 mm | 8.80" | 2560x1600 | |
| 88.6 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2024 | Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro SD 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750 | 225 g | 8.9 mm | 6.78" | 2400x1080 | |
| 85.9 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2022 | Xiaomi Poco F4 GT SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730 | 210 g | 8.5 mm | 6.67" | 2400x1080 |
外壳 - Razer Edge 采用大量塑料包裹
Razer Edge 的显示屏相当小巧，但却相当厚重。我们说的不仅是相当厚的机身，还有相当过时的屏占比，仅为 79%。不过，至少没有打孔摄像头来干扰屏幕上的内容。
Edge 做工精良。磨砂铝边框感觉非常高档，整齐地包裹着显示屏，显示屏由康宁大猩猩 6 号玻璃保护。背面由哑光塑料制成，但会留下指纹。虽然后盖整体非常贴合，但它与边框之间的缝隙可以更均匀一些。背面还有用于散热风扇的排气口。这款平板电脑的防护等级为 IP52，这意味着当机身倾斜达 15°时，它可以防止有限的灰尘进入和滴水。不过，在附带的说明中，Razer 补充说该设备可以在短时间浸入浅水后安然无恙。
随附的岸V2 Pro游戏控制器完全由塑料制成，从材质上看，外观和手感都相当不错。按键的移动距离相差很大，但启动点非常精确。Razer 平板电脑只需卡入控制器并通过 USB 端口连接即可。虽然这样做效果不错，但安装起来感觉有点摇晃。连接控制器后，Razer Edge 的尺寸为 265.6 x 92.2 x 33.9 毫米（约 10.5 x 3.6 x 1.3 英寸），重 402 克（约 0.89 磅）。
规格 - 支持 USB 3.2 和 microSD
Razer Edge 配备了一个 USB 3.2 Gen 2 端口，纸面传输速度可达 10 Gbit/s。但在拷贝测试中，我们只达到了 246.77 MB/s。该接口支持 OTG，也兼容 FAT、FAT32 或 exFAT 格式的存储驱动器。Edge 既不支持 NTFS，也不支持有线视频输出。
microSD 读卡器
microSD 插槽兼容所有传统的存储卡型号。不过，它不支持 exFAT 文件系统，只能用于移动存储。这意味着应用程序不能直接安装在 microSD 卡上，不过你可以进入开发者选项，强制设备允许这样做。
对于Android 设备来说，读卡器的速度相当一般，仅在复制测试中表现平平。不过，基于 Windows 的竞争对手在这方面要快得多。
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Razer Edge (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
软件 -Android 12，无 DRM 认证
Razer Edge 装有谷歌Android 12，尚未升级到Android 13（更不用说 14）。在撰写本文时，安全补丁的日期为 2024 年 2 月 1 日，Play 更新的日期为 2024 年 3 月。因此，两者都是最新的。现在还不清楚 Edge 还能支持多久的更新。Razer 尚未对此作出回应。一旦收到他们的回复，我们将立即更新本文。
Razer 大部分时间都在使用
Android ，几乎没有安装任何第三方应用程序。设备上只预装了GeForce Now、Parsec、Steam Link 和公司自己的 Nexus 应用程序，并可根据需要轻松卸载。系统方面还启用了用户帐户控制。
连接性和全球导航卫星系统 - 配备三频 Wi-Fi 的 Razer 手持设备
Razer Edge 支持 Wi-Fi 6E，包括 6GHz 频段。这在同价位产品中并不常见，但考虑到该设备的用途，它具有巨大的优势。当连接到我们的参考路由器（华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000）时，该平板电脑提供了很高且稳定的传输速率。
Wi-Fi 版不支持卫星导航。
| Networking | |
| Razer Edge | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Xiaomi Poco F4 GT | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
前置摄像头 - 500 万像素全高清
Razer Edge 背面没有任何摄像头，只配备了一个 500 万像素的前置摄像头。用这枚摄像头拍摄的照片看起来有点太暗，光线稍弱时已经开始出现明显的噪点。
这里的重点可能是视频通话和流媒体。在视频模式下（最大 1080p 和 60 fps），摄像头的裁剪系数较高，但质量相当不错，包括 HDR。两个麦克风确保了极佳的语音清晰度，但会让用户听起来有些刺耳。
配件和保修 - 包括岸 V2 Pro
在包装盒内，您会发现一个 Kishi V2 Pro 游戏控制器、一条 USB-C 电缆和一套 Razer Edge 附带的贴纸。
该设备提供为期 12 个月的保修服务，但无论如何，法定保修条款均适用。
输入设备和操作 - 关注基本要素
Edge 上的电容式触摸屏可同时检测多达十个触摸输入，并能快速、精确地作出反应。Razer 没有提供有关显示屏触摸采样率的任何信息，但我们使用一个应用程序测得的数值高达 380Hz。
生物识别安全对于游戏平板电脑来说是一个陌生的概念。屏幕锁只有基本的保护功能。我们希望该设备至少能支持人脸识别。线性振动电机提供了清晰的反馈。
在软件功能方面，Edge 还算基本。但至少岸控制器提供了一些额外的功能。除了众多控制选项外，你还可以找到一个 Nexus 应用程序专用按钮和一个截图按钮。
显示屏 - AMOLED，频率高达 144Hz
Razer Edge 显示屏本身的尺寸与智能手机上的显示屏相似，拥有全高清+分辨率。系统没有采用自适应刷新率，用户可以在固定的 60、90、120 和 144Hz 之间进行选择。
在显示纯白背景时，显示器的平均峰值亮度为 445 cd/m²。无论是否启用环境光传感器，亮度都不会有太大变化。当明暗表面均匀分布时，峰值亮度高达 622 cd/m²（APL18）。在播放 YouTube 上的 HDR 视频时，面板亮度高达 647 cd/m²。
。
在最低亮度下，OLED 闪烁在 240Hz 左右徘徊，有点不稳定，振幅曲线相当平缓。对闪烁敏感的人在使用屏幕时可能会遇到问题。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 449 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 5.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.24
| Razer Edge AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.8" | Ayaneo Kun IPS, 2560x1600, 8.4" | Lenovo Legion Go IPS, 2560x1600, 8.8" | Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro OLED, 2400x1080, 6.8" | Xiaomi Poco F4 GT AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 7% | -0% | 119% | 60% | |
| Brightness middle | 449 | 680 51% | 411 -8% | 1699 278% | 807 80% |
| Brightness | 445 | 678 52% | 413 -7% | 1698 282% | 806 81% |
| Brightness Distribution | 95 | 91 -4% | 80 -16% | 98 3% | 99 4% |
| Black Level * | 0.5 | 0.42 | |||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.8 | 4 17% | 5.94 -24% | 1.9 60% | 1.2 75% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.1 | 9 -11% | 10.56 -30% | 4.7 42% | 3.1 62% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.5 | 9 -64% | 0.92 83% | 2.8 49% | 2.2 60% |
| Gamma | 2.24 98% | 2 110% | 1.93 114% | 2.26 97% | 2.2 100% |
| CCT | 7538 86% | 7188 90% | 8064 81% | 6648 98% | 6439 101% |
| Contrast | 1360 | 979 | |||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1 | 2.95 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 244 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 244 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 244 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
无法为 Razer Edge 创建其他色彩配置文件。在默认设置下，这款游戏平板电脑的白平衡偏冷，饱和度较高。尽管如此，色彩仍能准确再现。只有绿色在这方面略显突出。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0.74 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.3975 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.338 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 0.97 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.4965 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.469 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
如果要确保屏幕在户外清晰可读，阳光就不能太强烈。亮度储备太低，显示屏无法在阳光直射下使用。
Edge 的可视角度很好。从锐利的角度观察屏幕时，只有轻微的亮度衰减和轻微的绿色色调。
性能 - 配备 Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 的 Razer Edge
Razer Edge 配备了高通游戏 SoC - Snapdragon G3x Gen 1。 骁龙 888+ 5G的缩减版。无论如何，我们几乎看不出任何不同之处：CPU、连接模块和主板完全相同，GPU 运行速度稍快，高达 900MHz。它可能缺少了许多相机功能，在人工智能基准测试中的表现也要差 40% 以上。
与此同时，骁龙 888+ 已经有三年多的历史，因此不再是什么高端芯片。尽管 G3x 仍领先于目前的中端 SoC。
| Antutu v10 - Total Score | |
| Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro | |
| Average of class Tablet (164396 - 2716980, n=36, last 2 years) | |
| Nothing Phone (2a) | |
| Razer Edge | |
| Antutu v9 - Total Score | |
| Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro | |
| Xiaomi Poco F4 GT | |
| Razer Edge | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 () | |
| Nothing Phone (2a) | |
| Average of class Tablet (92766 - 1286774, n=48, last 2 years) | |
| PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 | |
| Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro | |
| Razer Edge | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 () | |
| Xiaomi Poco F4 GT | |
| Nothing Phone (2a) | |
| Average of class Tablet (3195 - 20841, n=72, last 2 years) | |
| CrossMark - Overall | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Razer Edge | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 () | |
| Average of class Tablet (172 - 1944, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Nothing Phone (2a) | |
| Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro | |
| AImark - Score v3.x | |
| Nothing Phone (2a) | |
| Average of class Tablet (84 - 156427, n=50, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro | |
| Razer Edge | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 () | |
| UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI | |
| Nothing Phone (2a) | |
| Razer Edge | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 () | |
| Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro | |
| Average of class Tablet (1662 - 74821, n=56, last 2 years) | |
图形处理由集成的 Adreno 660.同样，它不再处于最前沿，但仍能提供出色的性能。特别是，它与中端 GPU 相比，优势明显。
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
| 3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | |
| Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro | |
| Xiaomi Poco F4 GT | |
| Razer Edge | |
| Nothing Phone (2a) | |
| 3DMark / Wild Life Extreme | |
| Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro | |
| Xiaomi Poco F4 GT | |
| Razer Edge | |
| Nothing Phone (2a) | |
| 3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score | |
| Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro | |
| Xiaomi Poco F4 GT | |
| Razer Edge | |
| Nothing Phone (2a) | |
| 3DMark / Wild Life Score | |
| Razer Edge | |
| Nothing Phone (2a) | |
| Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro | |
| 3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score | |
| Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro | |
| 3DMark / Solar Bay Score | |
| Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro | |
| 3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | |
| Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro | |
| Xiaomi Poco F4 GT | |
| Razer Edge | |
| Nothing Phone (2a) | |
| 3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | |
| Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro | |
| Xiaomi Poco F4 GT | |
| Razer Edge | |
| Nothing Phone (2a) | |
| 3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | |
| Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro | |
| Razer Edge | |
| Xiaomi Poco F4 GT | |
| Nothing Phone (2a) | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen | |
| Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro | |
| Razer Edge | |
| Razer Edge | |
| Xiaomi Poco F4 GT | |
| Nothing Phone (2a) | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen | |
| Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro | |
| Xiaomi Poco F4 GT | |
| Razer Edge | |
| Razer Edge | |
| Nothing Phone (2a) | |
| GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
| Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro | |
| Razer Edge | |
| Razer Edge | |
| Xiaomi Poco F4 GT | |
| Nothing Phone (2a) | |
| GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
| Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro | |
| Xiaomi Poco F4 GT | |
| Razer Edge | |
| Razer Edge | |
| Nothing Phone (2a) | |
| GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
| Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro | |
| Xiaomi Poco F4 GT | |
| Razer Edge | |
| Razer Edge | |
| Nothing Phone (2a) | |
| GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
| Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro | |
| Xiaomi Poco F4 GT | |
| Razer Edge | |
| Razer Edge | |
| Nothing Phone (2a) | |
| GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen | |
| Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro | |
| Xiaomi Poco F4 GT | |
| Razer Edge | |
| Nothing Phone (2a) | |
| GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen | |
| Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro | |
| Xiaomi Poco F4 GT | |
| Razer Edge | |
| Nothing Phone (2a) | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
| Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro | |
| Xiaomi Poco F4 GT | |
| Razer Edge | |
| Nothing Phone (2a) | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
| Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro | |
| Xiaomi Poco F4 GT | |
| Razer Edge | |
| Nothing Phone (2a) | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
| Razer Edge | |
| Xiaomi Poco F4 GT | |
| Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro | |
| Nothing Phone (2a) | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
| Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro | |
| Xiaomi Poco F4 GT | |
| Razer Edge | |
| Nothing Phone (2a) | |
| GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
| Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro | |
| Razer Edge | |
| Nothing Phone (2a) | |
| Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
| Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro (Edge 121.0.2277.84) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 () | |
| Razer Edge (Chrome 123) | |
| Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Poco F4 GT (MS Edge 102) | |
| Nothing Phone (2a) (Firefox 124.2.0) | |
| WebXPRT 4 - Overall | |
| Ayaneo Kun (Chrome 105.0.0.0) | |
| Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro (Edge 121.0.2277.84) | |
| Razer Edge (Chrome 123) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 () | |
| Nothing Phone (2a) (Firefox 124.2.0) | |
| Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=67, last 2 years) | |
| WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
| Lenovo Legion Go (Chrome 82) | |
| Ayaneo Kun (Chrome 82) | |
| Ayaneo Kun (Chrome 82) | |
| Razer Edge (Chrome 123) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 () | |
| Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro (Edge 121.0.2277.84) | |
| Nothing Phone (2a) (Firefox 124.2.0) | |
| Average of class Tablet (34 - 435, n=44, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Poco F4 GT (MS Edge 102) | |
| Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
| Razer Edge (Chrome 123) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 () | |
| Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro (Edge 121.0.2277.84) | |
| Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Nothing Phone (2a) (Chrome 123.0.6312.99) | |
| Xiaomi Poco F4 GT (MS Edge 102) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro (Edge 121.0.2277.84) | |
| Razer Edge (Chrome 123) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 () | |
| Xiaomi Poco F4 GT (MS Edge 102) | |
| Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=85, last 2 years) | |
| Nothing Phone (2a) (Firefox 124.2.0) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=73, last 2 years) | |
| Nothing Phone (2a) (Firefox 124.2.0) | |
| Xiaomi Poco F4 GT (MS Edge 102) | |
| Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro (Edge 121.0.2277.84) | |
| Razer Edge (Chrome 123) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 () | |
| Ayaneo Kun (Chrome 82) | |
| Ayaneo Kun (Chrome 82) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go (Chrome 82) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Razer Edge | Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro | Xiaomi Poco F4 GT | Nothing Phone (2a) | Average 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | Average of class Tablet | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 189% | 62% | 9% | 2% | -20% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 1442.83 | 4016.67 178% | 1832.34 27% | 1028.37 -29% | 1602 ? 11% | 1055 ? -27% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 692.3 | 3153.4 355% | 1482.42 114% | 952 38% | 748 ? 8% | 692 ? 0% |
| Random Read 4KB | 264.67 | 434.63 64% | 328.58 24% | 273.19 3% | 243 ? -8% | 191 ? -28% |
| Random Write 4KB | 252.12 | 648 157% | 457.69 82% | 311.8 24% | 244 ? -3% | 191.4 ? -24% |
游戏 - 不仅为Android 游戏奠定坚实基础
我们首先使用 GameBench 分析工具和选定的游戏对 Razer Edge 的常规游戏性能进行了测试。在测试过程中，这款游戏平板电脑表现出了很高的性能，但也达到了技术极限。玄心冲击》运行相当流畅，但无法使用 120 fps 模式，这在意料之中。英雄联盟》虽然只有在降低设置的情况下才能稳定地达到如此高的帧率。相比之下，《PUBG Mobile》只缺少 90 帧模式，但在其他方面都能在较高设置下流畅运行。
Kishi V2 Pro 游戏手柄的一大优势，尤其是在第一人称射击游戏或平台游戏中。你不仅可以用它来玩兼容的游戏，还可以通过 Nexus 应用程序在显示屏上执行虚拟触摸手势，以最大限度地扩大可视面积。遗憾的是，设置这个功能需要一些时间。
您还可以在 Razer Edge 上使用 Xbox Cloud Gaming、Steam Link、GeForce Now 或 PS Remote Play，在平板电脑上玩主机或 PC 游戏。对于本地解决方案（如 Steam Link），必须使用高速 Wi-Fi 连接（最低 Wi-Fi 6），否则可能会出现视觉故障和卡顿。
排放 - 带风扇的 Razer 平板电脑
噪音排放
如有需要，Razer Edge 将使用主动风冷。当设备运行正常的系统进程时，风扇通常听不到声音或完全空转。但在加载时，尤其是游戏时，风扇会发出很大的声音。尽管声音不会太大（在我们的测试中略高于 41 dB(A)），但在安静的环境中还是会让人分心。如果负载不足，风扇就会开始以脉冲方式运转，有时会非常烦人。
温度
在负载情况下，Razer Edge 某些位置的表面温度可能会超过 47°C (116.6°F)。游戏时，左手所在区域也会明显发热。这并不令人担忧，但肯定会造成困扰。
在 3DMark 压力测试中，我们看到了明显的性能下降。虽然这种下降在合理范围内，但考虑到它采用了主动散热技术，我们原本期望它能提供更稳定的性能。例如 摩托罗拉 Edge 30 Fusion的性能与之相当，而 ROG Phone 5s则更加稳定（两者都配备了 骁龙 888+).
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47.7 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.1 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.8 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
3DMark Wild Life Stress Test
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Razer Edge | |
| Xiaomi Poco F4 GT | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Razer Edge | |
| Xiaomi Poco F4 GT | |
| Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability | |
| Razer Edge | |
发言人
Razer Edge 的两个扬声器并没有带来令人惊叹的音频体验，反而相当平庸。中音过于突出，导致高音听起来略显空洞，而低音则很弱。
在平板电脑模式下，USB-C 端口可用作音频输出。将设备插入游戏控制器后，您就可以使用专用音频插孔（3.5 毫米；信噪比：78.5 dBFS）和 USB 端口。如果您想使用无线耳机或扬声器，还可使用蓝牙 5.2。
Razer Edge audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Ayaneo Kun audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 31% of all tested devices in this class were better, 15% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 18%, worst was 23%
Compared to all devices tested
» 30% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电源管理 - Razer 游戏掌上电脑的 5,000 毫安时电池
耗电量
Razer Edge 的功耗并无异常。高耗电值（对于Android 设备而言）是我们使用 Burnout Benchmark 的结果，而我们比较的其他两款Android 设备则使用了同时过时的稳定性测试进行分析。
| Off / Standby |   0.09 / 0.2 Watt |
| Idle |  1.2 / 1.33 / 1.37 Watt |
| Load |
12.16 / 15.14 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Razer Edge 5000 mAh | Ayaneo Kun mAh | Lenovo Legion Go mAh | Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro 5500 mAh | Xiaomi Poco F4 GT 4700 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -988% | -671% | 33% | 19% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 1.2 | 14 -1067% | 11.5 -858% | 0.82 32% | 1 17% |
| Idle Average * | 1.33 | 17.56 -1220% | 12 -802% | 0.96 28% | 1.53 -15% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.37 | 27 -1871% | 17.4 -1170% | 1.19 13% | 1.57 -15% |
| Load Average * | 12.16 | 38.1 -213% | 45 -270% | 7.3 40% | 4.39 64% |
| Load Maximum * | 15.14 | 101 -567% | 54 -257% | 7.3 52% | 8.1 46% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 83.5 | 42.6 |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
Leistungsaufnahme: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)
电池寿命
Razer 承诺 Edge 平板电脑及其 5,000 毫安时电池可提供长达 10 小时的视频流。在我们进行的实际 Wi-Fi 测试中，在屏幕亮度调节到 150 cd/m²、刷新率固定为 144Hz 的情况下，该设备持续了近 9 个小时。这意味着，如果降低亮度或刷新率，10 个小时应该没问题。尽管如此，Edge 在续航时间方面并没有成为真正的猛兽。
| Battery Runtime | |
| WiFi v1.3 (sort by value) | |
| Razer Edge | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro | |
| Xiaomi Poco F4 GT | |
| Witcher 3 ultra (sort by value) | |
| Ayaneo Kun | |
Pros
Cons
结论：功能强大的小型游戏平板电脑
Razer Edge 首先是一款完全专注于游戏的微型平板电脑。虽然 骁龙 G3x 1 代虽然其内部的骁龙 G3x Gen 1 已经不再是最前沿的技术，但仍能提供高水平的性能。附带的 Kishi V2 Pro 控制器可卡在 Edge 上，使其成为一个完全成熟的游戏掌上设备。此外，这款平板电脑比基于 Windows 系统的竞争对手要轻巧得多，价格也便宜得多。
Razer Edge 以其超高的性价比脱颖而出，很好地满足了市场需求。
除了可以运行Android 游戏外，Edge 还可以让你从云端串流 PC 游戏，也完全可以从家用游戏机或 PC 本地串流游戏。特别是，Razer 平板电脑的速度应该足以在自己的网络内进行流媒体传输。遗憾的是，Razer 决定放弃 DRM 认证，这意味着 Edge 并不完全适合作为媒体流平台，尽管它能够通过电缆输出视频信号。由于不支持 exFAT，板载 microSD 插槽的功能大打折扣。
如果能有一个内置脚架就更好了，风扇控制有时也很烦人。总的来说，我们希望主动散热风扇能发挥更大的作用。支持更新的时间也很短。显示屏也可以稍大一些。
在这个价位段，很难找到真正能替代 Razer Edge 的产品。充其量，像 Poco F5等智能手机能提供类似的性能，但不带任何控制器。经济型平板电脑并不是游戏串流的真正选择，因为它们缺乏这种使用情况所需的快速 Wi-Fi 功能。
由于 Razer Edge 是作为平板电脑进行评测的，而噪音排放与此产品类别并不相关，因此我们决定对风扇脉动进行扣分。
价格
Razer Edge Wi-Fi 可直接从购买，价格约为 500 欧元（400 美元）。.5G 版本仅在美国有售，售价约为 600 美元。在撰写本评论时，该设备在亚马逊等在线零售商的售价要便宜得多（德国为 360 欧元，美国为300 美元）。
对于有意为智能手机购买游戏手柄的用户，Kishi V2 Pro 可以单独购买，并与许多Android 手机兼容。亚马逊的售价约为123 欧元（或130 美元）。
Razer Edge
- 04/16/2024 v7 (old)
Daniel Schmidt
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Price comparison
