微软 Lumia 550 智能手机简短评测
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
|
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 536 cd/m²
Contrast: 865:1 (Black: 0.62 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.81 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 7.72 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.18
Microsoft Lumia 550 Adreno 304, 210 MSM8909, 8 GB eMMC Flash | Sony Xperia E4g Mali-T760 MP2, MT6732, 8 GB eMMC Flash | Samsung Galaxy J1 Mali-400 MP2, SC8830, 4 GB Flash | Microsoft Lumia 535 Adreno 302, 200 MSM8212, 8 GB eMMC Flash | LG Joy Adreno 302, 200 8210, 4 GB Flash | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 28% | -13% | 3% | -28% | |
Brightness middle | 536 | 458 -15% | 370 -31% | 431 -20% | 322 -40% |
Brightness | 535 | 434 -19% | 364 -32% | 424 -21% | 313 -41% |
Brightness Distribution | 95 | 88 -7% | 95 0% | 90 -5% | 91 -4% |
Black Level * | 0.62 | 0.21 66% | 0.63 -2% | 0.64 -3% | 0.31 50% |
Contrast | 865 | 2181 152% | 587 -32% | 673 -22% | 1039 20% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.81 | 6.95 -20% | 5.99 -3% | 3.6 38% | 11.57 -99% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 12.3 | ||||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 7.72 | 4.87 37% | 7.28 6% | 3.71 52% | 14.02 -82% |
Gamma | 2.18 101% | 2.38 92% | 2.59 85% | 2.4 92% | 2.45 90% |
CCT | 8701 75% | 6635 98% | 7949 82% | 6878 95% | 17420 37% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 84.3705 |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14 ms rise | |
↘ 14 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14 ms rise | |
↘ 18 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Microsoft Lumia 550 |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Microsoft Lumia 550 | |
Sony Xperia E4g | |
LG Joy | |
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Microsoft Lumia 550 | |
Sony Xperia E4g | |
LG Joy |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
Microsoft Lumia 550 | |
Sony Xperia E4g | |
Microsoft Lumia 535 | |
Samsung Galaxy J1 | |
LG Joy |
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Microsoft Lumia 550 | |
Sony Xperia E4g | |
LG Joy |
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value) | |
Microsoft Lumia 550 | |
Sony Xperia E4g | |
Samsung Galaxy J1 | |
LG Joy |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Microsoft Lumia 550 |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.9 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.7 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.9 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Off / Standby | 0 / 0.6 Watt |
Idle | 0.55 / 2.69 / 2.93 Watt |
Load |
3.94 / 4.24 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Gossen Metrahit Energy |
Microsoft Lumia 550 Adreno 304, 210 MSM8909, 8 GB eMMC Flash | Sony Xperia E4g Mali-T760 MP2, MT6732, 8 GB eMMC Flash | Microsoft Lumia 535 Adreno 302, 200 MSM8212, 8 GB eMMC Flash | Samsung Galaxy J1 Mali-400 MP2, SC8830, 4 GB Flash | LG Joy Adreno 302, 200 8210, 4 GB Flash | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 46% | -11% | 60% | 14% | |
Reader / Idle | 1024 | 912 -11% | 948 -7% | 1262 23% | 1018 -1% |
H.264 | 416 | 528 27% | 322 -23% | 512 23% | 528 27% |
WiFi v1.3 | 445 | 452 2% | 648 46% | 353 -21% | |
Load | 129 | 344 167% | 127 -2% | 321 149% | 196 52% |
WiFi | 376 |
Pros
Cons
微软为Lumia 550贴上了比前代产品更高的价码,不过它也有更多的亮点:支持LTE,更高分辨率的屏幕以及更大的电池容量。但是,无法否认的还有它前置相机的像素数有所降低,同时没有再预装一些应用如MixRadio或HereDrive+。Lumia 535的一些优势,例如可更换的电池、micro-SD卡槽和可更换的后盖都得到了保留。Lumia 550的屏幕尺寸相比前作有些缩小,同时它受到了Windows 10移动版一些bug的影响。持此之外,这个操作系统的一些重要功能如“Continuum”或通过虹膜扫描登录在Lumia 550中都没有得到支持。
整体上,Lumia 550是一款性价比合理的不错智能手机,它的速度足够日常使用,也提供了优质的屏幕,对LTE的支持以及micro-SD卡槽和可更换电池。
它的机身质量可以给人不错的印象,不过抗压能力较差。它的信号接受很好,通话质量也可以让人满意,主相机可以拍摄质量不错的照片。它的屏幕明亮,色彩还原准确。系统的操作流畅,性能可以满足大部分日常需要。它的电池可以提供一整天的续航时间。市面上90欧元(约645人民币)的售价让人很难再挑剔什么了。不过,更坚固的机身和更好的前置相机将会让Lumia 550更进一步。微软需要调整他们不够稳定的操作系统的功耗问题。
注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。
Microsoft Lumia 550
- 02/26/2016 v5 (old)
Florian Wimmer