Notebookcheck Logo

英特尔 Lunar Lake iGPU 分析 - Arc Graphics 140V 比 Radeon 890M 更快更高效

英特尔 Lunar Lake 处理器配备了采用第二代 Xe 核心的新型集成图形适配器。我们评估了配备 8 个 Xe 内核的新型 Arc Graphics 140V 的性能和效率。
Arc Benchmark Intel Lunar Lake Laptop / Notebook Windows

我们已经对英特尔新款 Lunar Lake SoC 的处理器进行了仔细研究 (点击这里查看我们的分析);现在我们来关注一下新的集成图形处理器 Arc Graphics 140V。除了合成测试外,我们还对实际性能和游戏性能特别感兴趣,而以前的 Arc Graphics 型号在这方面仍面临一些挑战。

概述 - Intel Arc Graphics 140V

Lunar Lake 处理器有两个新的 GPU 选项:Arc Graphics 140V 和 Arc Graphics 130V。这些型号在 Xe 内核数量和最高时钟频率上有所不同,这一点与上一代产品非常相似。140V 配备了 8 个 Xe 核心,而 130V 配备了 7 个 Xe 核心。这标志着第二代 Xe 内核的诞生,现在每个内核都有 8 个 Xe 向量引擎。集成图形处理器支持 DirectX 12 和基于硬件的光线追踪。

Xe2 架构概览(来源:英特尔)
Xe2 架构概览(来源:英特尔)

由于新媒体引擎支持 VVC 编解码器,因此可以通过 DisplayPort 2.1 或 HDMI 2.1 以 60 Hz 输出 8K HDR 视频(或 3x 4K HDR @ 60 Hz)。新 iGPU 的主频速度从 1.85 GHz(Arc Graphics 130V)到最高 2.05 GHz(酷睿 Ultra 9 288V 中的 Arc Graphics 140V)不等。在我们的测试中,我们使用的是 Core Ultra 7 258V,Arc Graphics 140V 的最高时钟频率为 1.95 GHz。

媒体编码器概述(来源:英特尔)
媒体编码器概述(来源:英特尔)

测试系统

华硕 Zenbook S 14
华硕 Zenbook S 14

我们的测试系统是 华硕 Zenbook S 14我们已经对其进行了全面评测。这是一款轻薄的 14 英寸笔记本电脑,采用英特尔酷睿 Ultra 7 258V、Arc Graphics 140V 和 32 GB LPDDR5x-8533 内存。它能在短时间内达到 37 瓦的最大指定功耗,但在 20 秒后的最快节能模式下,最大功耗稳定在 28 瓦。140V 采用 32.0.101.5730 A01 版 GPU 驱动程序,默认情况下为 iGPU 分配了 16 GB 内存。

我们还测试了配备英特尔酷睿 Ultra 7 155H/Arc Graphics 图形处理器的 Zenbook 14、配备 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370/Radeon 890M 图形处理器的 Zenbook S 16 和配备 AMD Ryzen AI 9 365/Radeon 880M 图形处理器的联想 Yoga Pro 7 14。每次测试都使用 ThrottleStop 和 Universal x86 Tuning Utility 工具设置 TDP 值。

测试程序

为了对不同显卡进行有意义的比较,我们在考虑功耗的同时,还考虑了合成基准测试中的纯性能,从而确定效率。功耗测量始终在外部显示器上进行,以消除不同内部显示器的不同影响。不过,我们测量的是整个系统的功耗,而不是仅仅比较 TDP 值。

合成基准

新的 Arc Graphics 140V 在合成基准测试中表现优异,风扇模式对 Zenbook S 14 的 GPU 性能影响很大。在最快模式下,TDP 设置为 37/28 瓦,而在性能模式下,则为 37/24 瓦。两种配置在Time Spy 测试(图形)中都达到了 4000 分以上,使 Arc Graphics 140V 成为迄今为止我们测试过的最快的集成 GPU。相比之下,Zenbook S 16 中的 Radeon 890M 在类似的功耗限制下运行,速度要慢 15%。

在要求苛刻的Steel Nomad测试中,Arc Graphics 140V甚至比Radeon 890M领先59%。高通公司最快的集成 GPU Adreno X1-85 拥有 4.6 TFLOPS,在原生测试中也落后 33%。不过,在 WildLife Extreme Unlimited 测试中,新的 Arc Graphics 140V、Radeon 890M 和 Adreno X1-85 的表现不相上下,而Apple 的 M3 GPU 在该基准测试中明显领先。

3DMark / Time Spy Graphics
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
XPS 14 2024 OLED,
5107 Points +73%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU
Slim Pro 7 14ARP8,
4820 Points +63%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti,
4773 Points +62%
AMD Radeon RX 6550M
ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2,
4546 Points +54%
Intel Arc Graphics 140V
Zenbook S 14 UX5406, Zenbook S 14 Fullspeed Mode
4118 Points +39%
Intel Arc Graphics 140V
Zenbook S 14 UX5406, Zenbook S 14 Performance Mode
4047 Points +37%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
gram Pro 16Z90SP,
3786 Points +28%
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
MateBook X Pro 2024,
3719 Points +26%
Intel Arc Graphics 140V
Zenbook S 14 UX5406, Zenbook S 14 Standard Mode
3669 Points +24%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
VivoBook 14X K3405,
3493 Points +18%
AMD Radeon 890M
Zenbook S16 UM5606, Zenbook S 16
3421 Points +16%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
ExpertBook B3 B3404CVF,
3242 Points +10%
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
ZenBook 14 UX3405MA,
3206 Points +8%
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU
Galaxy Book4 Pro 360,
3000 Points +2%
AMD Radeon 880M
ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA,
2970 Points +1%
Intel Arc Graphics 140V
Zenbook S 14 UX5406, Zenbook S 14 Whisper Mode
2955 Points
NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU
ThinkPad P14s G4 21HF0017GE,
2873 Points -3%
AMD Radeon 780M
XMG Evo 14 (M24),
2860 Points -3%
Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE,
2049 Points -31%
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100, Galaxy Book4 Edge 16
1989 Points -33%
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9,
1717 Points -42%
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
Galaxy Book4 Edge 14,
1546 Points -48%
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
ProArt PZ13 HT5306, ProArt PZ13 Standard Mode
877 Points -70%
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core, VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core Standard Mode
873 Points -70%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
gram Pro 16Z90SP,
3940 Points
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
gram Pro 16Z90SP,
3903 Points
Intel Arc Graphics 140V
Zenbook S 14 UX5406, Zenbook S 14 Standard Mode
3299 Points
AMD Radeon 890M
Zenbook S16 UM5606, Zenbook S 16
3198 Points
AMD Radeon 780M
XMG Evo 14 (M24),
2816 Points
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100, Galaxy Book4 Edge 16
2467 Points
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9,
2118 Points
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
Galaxy Book4 Edge 14,
2071 Points
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
ProArt PZ13 HT5306, ProArt PZ13 Standard Mode
1148 Points
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core, VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core Standard Mode
1147 Points
3DMark / Steel Nomad Score
Intel Arc Graphics 140V
Zenbook S 14 UX5406, Zenbook S 14 Standard Mode
883 Points
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100, Galaxy Book4 Edge 16
590 Points
AMD Radeon 890M
Zenbook S16 UM5606, Zenbook S 16
557 Points
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9,
512 Points
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
Galaxy Book4 Edge 14,
510 Points
AMD Radeon 780M
XMG Evo 14 (M24),
500 Points
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
ProArt PZ13 HT5306, ProArt PZ13 Standard Mode
233 Points
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core, VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core Standard Mode
232 Points
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
gram Pro 16Z90SP,
223 Points
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
gram Pro 16Z90SP,
47 Points
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU
MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro,
14545 Points
Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU
MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro,
12094 Points
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
XPS 14 2024 OLED,
9394 Points
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti,
9340 Points
Apple M3 10-Core GPU
MacBook Air 15 M3,
8286 Points
Apple M3 10-Core GPU
MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU,
8239 Points
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
VivoBook 14X K3405,
7247 Points
Intel Arc Graphics 140V
Zenbook S 14 UX5406, Zenbook S 14 Standard Mode
6982 Points
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100, Galaxy Book4 Edge 16
6978 Points
AMD Radeon 890M
Zenbook S16 UM5606, Zenbook S 16
6855 Points
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
ZenBook 14 UX3405MA,
6558 Points
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
MateBook X Pro 2024,
6363 Points
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU
Galaxy Book4 Pro 360,
5744 Points
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
Galaxy Book4 Edge 14,
5522 Points
Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE,
3681 Points
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
ProArt PZ13 HT5306, ProArt PZ13 Standard Mode
3187 Points
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core, VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core Standard Mode
3164 Points

在 OpenCL 和 OpenGL 基准测试中,Arc Graphics 140V 的性能明显低于预期。在某些情况下,新的集成 GPU 明显落后于前代产品。不过,随着未来驱动程序的更新,性能还有可能得到改善。

Geekbench 6.2 / GPU OpenCL
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
64570 Points
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro
M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core, Apple SSD AP0512Z
50373 Points
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
48462 Points
Asus ExpertBook B3 B3404CVF
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, i7-1355U, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
43378 Points
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro
M3 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 11-Core, Apple SSD AP0512Z
42798 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21HF0017GE
RTX A500 Laptop GPU, i7-1370P, SK Hynix HFS002TEJ9X162N
42411 Points
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00
36741 Points
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
34259 Points
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
32096 Points
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360
Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
31245 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2
Radeon RX 6550M, R9 PRO 7940HS, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02
30568 Points
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU
M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z
30506 Points
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z
30470 Points
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24)
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
29852 Points
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406
Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
29389 Points
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
27595 Points
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14
Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100
20677 Points
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9
Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
20592 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE
Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 7 165U, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02
17704 Points
Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core
Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, SD X Plus X1P-42-100, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
9994 Points
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306
Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, SD X Plus X1P-42-100, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00
9991 Points
Geekbench 6.2 / GPU Vulkan 6.2
Asus ExpertBook B3 B3404CVF
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, i7-1355U, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
41279 Points
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
38270 Points
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
36750 Points
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
35419 Points
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00
35076 Points
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
34432 Points
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406
Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
34432 Points
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
33133 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2
Radeon RX 6550M, R9 PRO 7940HS, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02
29898 Points
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360
Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
28903 Points
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24)
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
28131 Points
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14
Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100
23722 Points
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9
Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
23247 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21HF0017GE
RTX A500 Laptop GPU, i7-1370P, SK Hynix HFS002TEJ9X162N
20666 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE
Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 7 165U, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02
19484 Points
Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core
Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, SD X Plus X1P-42-100, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
11351 Points
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306
Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, SD X Plus X1P-42-100, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00
11315 Points
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro
M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core, Apple SSD AP0512Z
97.8 fps
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro
M3 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 11-Core, Apple SSD AP0512Z
79 fps
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z
52.6 fps
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU
M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z
51.8 fps
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
36.4 fps
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360
Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
33.9 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21HF0017GE
RTX A500 Laptop GPU, i7-1370P, SK Hynix HFS002TEJ9X162N
28.463 fps
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406
Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
28.4 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro
M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core, Apple SSD AP0512Z
219.7 fps
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro
M3 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 11-Core, Apple SSD AP0512Z
178.7 fps
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z
120 fps
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU
M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z
114.4 fps
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360
Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
77.4 fps
Asus ZenBook S 16 OLED UM5606WA
Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
73.3 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21HF0017GE
RTX A500 Laptop GPU, i7-1370P, SK Hynix HFS002TEJ9X162N
64.7296 fps
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406
Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
60.6 fps

游戏基准

我们对游戏基准测试感到非常兴奋,因为之前的 Arc Graphics 虽然在合成测试中表现出色,但在游戏性能方面往往难以保持领先地位,经常被 Radeon 780M 超越,尤其是在发布后不久。好消息是,新的 Arc Graphics 140V 似乎没有这个问题。虽然性能会因游戏而异,但在类似的功率限制下,新的 140V 的性能普遍超过了 Radeon 890M。即使是像《赛博朋克 2077》和《博德之门 3》这样要求苛刻的游戏,在降低细节设置的情况下也能以 1080p 的分辨率流畅运行,而且还可以通过 XeSS 升采样增强性能。我们将很快为当前具有固定功率限制的 iGPU 添加更多游戏基准测试。

Performance Rating - Percent
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406
Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Zenbook S 14 Fullspeed Mode
95 pt
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406
Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Zenbook S 14 Performance Mode
94.9 pt
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 -1!
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU,
86.7 pt
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
AMD Radeon 890M, Zenbook S 16
86.6 pt
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406
Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Zenbook S 14 Standard Mode
83.9 pt
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU,
77.7 pt
Honor MagicBook Art 14
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU,
73.3 pt
Average of class Subnotebook
 
71.8 pt
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS,
59.4 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14 -1!
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU,
56.7 pt
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Medium Preset (FSR off)
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406
Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Zenbook S 14 Fullspeed Mode
37.7 (30.7min) fps
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406
Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Zenbook S 14 Performance Mode
37.2 (31.1min) fps
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406
Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Zenbook S 14 Standard Mode
31.7 (26.7min) fps
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
AMD Radeon 890M, Zenbook S 16
31.3 (19.7min) fps
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU,
30.2 (25.8min) fps
Average of class Subnotebook
  (13.8 - 43.7, n=25, last 2 years)
27.7 fps
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU,
26.8 (20.8min) fps
Honor MagicBook Art 14
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU,
25.1 (21.5min) fps
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS,
19.7 (15.8min) fps
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU,
16.3 (7.08min) fps
Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Medium Preset
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
AMD Radeon 890M, Zenbook S 16
35.8 fps
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406
Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Zenbook S 14 Fullspeed Mode
31.4 fps
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406
Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Zenbook S 14 Performance Mode
30.9 fps
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU,
28.8 fps
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406
Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Zenbook S 14 Standard Mode
26.3 fps
Average of class Subnotebook
  (15.5 - 35.4, n=22, last 2 years)
25.9 fps
Honor MagicBook Art 14
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU,
25.6 fps
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS,
20.1 fps
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
AMD Radeon 890M, Zenbook S 16
31 fps
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406
Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Zenbook S 14 Performance Mode
28 fps
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406
Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Zenbook S 14 Fullspeed Mode
28 fps
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406
Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Zenbook S 14 Standard Mode
27 fps
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU,
26.1 (24min) fps
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU,
25.9 (16min, 22P1) fps
Honor MagicBook Art 14
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU,
22.6 fps
Average of class Subnotebook
  (8.5 - 44.2, n=52, last 2 years)
21.9 fps
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU,
20.4 (16min, 18P1) fps
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS,
19.5 fps
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
AMD Radeon 890M, Zenbook S 16
30.4 (3.23min, 21.7P1) fps
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406
Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Zenbook S 14 Performance Mode
27.3 (7.84min, 21.7P1) fps
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406
Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Zenbook S 14 Fullspeed Mode
27 (8.38min, 21.3P1) fps
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406
Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Zenbook S 14 Standard Mode
23.4 (2.44min, 13.3P1) fps
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS,
21.1 (3.6min, 13P1) fps
Average of class Subnotebook
  (7.81 - 67.5, n=48, last 2 years)
19.7 fps
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU,
19.2 (2.77min, 14.5P1) fps
Honor MagicBook Art 14
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU,
18.3 (2.18min, 11.9P1) fps
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU,
14.3 (4.16min, 9.17P1) fps
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU,
11 (0.636min, 4.48P1) fps
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406
Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Zenbook S 14 Fullspeed Mode
33.2 fps
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406
Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Zenbook S 14 Performance Mode
32.1 fps
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU,
30.8 fps
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406
Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Zenbook S 14 Standard Mode
30 fps
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
AMD Radeon 890M, Zenbook S 16
28.6 fps
Honor MagicBook Art 14
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU,
26.5 fps
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU,
24.4 fps
Average of class Subnotebook
  (11.9 - 50.1, n=54, last 2 years)
23 fps
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU,
21 fps
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS,
15.7 fps
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406
Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Zenbook S 14 Fullspeed Mode
57.4 (27.7min, 42.6P1) fps
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406
Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Zenbook S 14 Performance Mode
56.2 (24.3min, 30.1P1) fps
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU,
56 fps
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406
Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Zenbook S 14 Standard Mode
54 (32min, 42.8P1) fps
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU,
50.3 (5.9min, 10.8P1) fps
Honor MagicBook Art 14
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU,
50 fps
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
AMD Radeon 890M, Zenbook S 16
49.8 (31.1min, 37.7P1) fps
Average of class Subnotebook
  (17.7 - 86, n=54, last 2 years)
39.5 fps
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS,
34 fps
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU,
31 fps
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU,
80.9 (51.2min) fps
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406
Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Zenbook S 14 Fullspeed Mode
80.4 (53.3min) fps
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406
Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Zenbook S 14 Performance Mode
80.3 (52.7min) fps
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU,
74.4 (51.9min) fps
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406
Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Zenbook S 14 Standard Mode
62.9 fps
Average of class Subnotebook
  (13 - 109.1, n=56, last 2 years)
62.1 fps
Honor MagicBook Art 14
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU,
60.8 (34min) fps
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU,
59.6 (44min) fps
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS,
51 (38min) fps
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
AMD Radeon 890M, Zenbook S 16
33.1 (18.7min) fps
Far Cry 5 - 1920x1080 High Preset AA:T
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406
Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Zenbook S 14 Performance Mode
48 fps
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
AMD Radeon 890M, Zenbook S 16
46 fps
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406
Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Zenbook S 14 Fullspeed Mode
45 fps
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU,
43 fps
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406
Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Zenbook S 14 Standard Mode
42 fps
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IMH9
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU,
41 (37min) fps
Average of class Subnotebook
  (17 - 79, n=41, last 2 years)
37.4 fps
Honor MagicBook Art 14
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU,
35 fps
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS,
31 fps
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 14
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU,
29 fps

Gaming benchmarks standard mode

low med. high ultra
GTA V (2015) 114.4 91.1 47.1 23.4
The Witcher 3 (2015) 119 90 51 27
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 93.1 59.7 67.2 62.9
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 75.6 40.9 30
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 38.9 35.1 29.8
Far Cry 5 (2018) 76 46 42 38
Strange Brigade (2018) 196.8 77.4 65.1 54
F1 23 (2023) 79.2 78 55.9 16.5
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) 34.2 26.3 23.6 23
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) 39.6 31.7 27.7 24.3
F1 24 (2024) 68.6 68.9 51.9 15.8
Black Myth: Wukong (2024) 20

Gaming benchmarks full speed mode

low med. high ultra
GTA V (2015) 158.7 152.4 66.3 27
The Witcher 3 (2015) 167 109 62 28
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 102.8 96 84.9 80.4
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 88.6 47.2 33.2
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 57 43.8 37.7
Far Cry 5 (2018) 94 51 45 42
Strange Brigade (2018) 229 80.2 67.2 57.4
F1 23 (2023) 101 89.9 63.1 18.8
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) 40.3 31.4 28.2 27.3
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) 45.4 37.7 33.3 28.9
F1 24 (2024) 90 81.5 60.4 19.1

GPU 效率

除了提供高性能,英特尔还设法提高了 Arc Graphics 140V 的效率。首先,我们对《赛博朋克 2077》进行了测试,它与包括骁龙 GPU 在内的其他 iGPU 相比优势巨大。与 Zenbook S 16 中的 Radeon 890M 相比,其领先优势达到了惊人的 66%。

Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 ultra Efficiency
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406
Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
0.696 fps per Watt
Honor MagicBook Art 14
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB
0.4816 fps per Watt
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14
Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100
0.4455 fps per Watt
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 RTX 4050
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
0.4205 fps per Watt
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
0.4176 fps per Watt
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9
Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365, Micron 2550 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TGE
0.3805 fps per Watt
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24)
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
0.3153 fps per Watt
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306
Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, SD X Plus X1P-42-100, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00
0.3064 fps per Watt
Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core
Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, SD X Plus X1P-42-100, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
0.306 fps per Watt
Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE
Radeon 680M, R7 7735U
0.2415 fps per Watt

我们还对 Witcher 3 的效率进行了评估,因为我们拥有包括 MacBook 在内的旧款笔记本电脑的大量对比数据。在这里,有利的结果是一致的,只有Apple GPU 的效率稍高一些(尽管游戏是模拟的)。然而,包括骁龙芯片在内的所有其他 GPU 都不尽如人意。

Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Efficiency (external Monitor)
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro
M3 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 11-Core, Apple SSD AP0512Z
1.189 fps per Watt
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z
1.096 fps per Watt
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro
M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core, Apple SSD AP0512Z
1.075 fps per Watt
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU
M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z
1.034 fps per Watt
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406
Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
0.882 fps per Watt
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.847 fps per Watt
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9
Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
0.771 fps per Watt
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606
Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
0.677 fps per Watt
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
0.615 fps per Watt
Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core
Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, SD X Plus X1P-42-100, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
0.611 fps per Watt
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306
Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, SD X Plus X1P-42-100, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00
0.582 fps per Watt
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4 21HF0017GE
RTX A500 Laptop GPU, i7-1370P, SK Hynix HFS002TEJ9X162N
0.571 fps per Watt
HP Pavilion Plus 16-ab0456tx
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
0.541 fps per Watt
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE
Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 7 165U, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02
0.54 fps per Watt
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
0.527 fps per Watt
Asus ExpertBook B3 B3404CVF
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, i7-1355U, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
0.522 fps per Watt
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
0.4933 fps per Watt
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9
Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365, Micron 2550 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TGE
0.4806 fps per Watt
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360
Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU
0.4368 fps per Watt
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00
0.4246 fps per Watt

结论--英特尔拥有最快的 iGPU,即使用于游戏也是如此

初步测试显示,新的英特尔 Arc Graphics 140V 的性能值得期待。在性能提升的同时,效率的提高更值得关注。只有Apple 的 M3 GPU 还保持着明显的优势,即将推出的 M4 代很可能会进一步扩大这一优势。

除了性能,英特尔还大幅提高了新的 Arc Graphics 140V 的效率。与上一代产品不同的是,它不仅在基准测试中表现出色,在实际游戏中也是如此。

由于效率的提高,新的 Lunar Lake 芯片对游戏手持设备越来越有吸引力,而英特尔在这一领域迄今为止还没有取得多大成功。例如,微星Claw在测试中的表现并不令人信服,因为Meteor Lake SoC需要耗费大量的电量才能取得不错的成绩。

我们很快将测试更快版本的 Arc Graphics 140V,其核心频率为 2.05 GHz,届时会更新相应的结果。这同样适用于配备 16GB 内存的 Arc Graphics 140V。此外,我们还将探索 Creator 基准,并进一步纳入游戏基准。

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 英特尔 Lunar Lake iGPU 分析 - Arc Graphics 140V 比 Radeon 890M 更快更高效
Andreas Osthoff, 2024-09-26 (Update: 2024-09-26)