Notebookcheck Logo

廉价的MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH在审查中。具备RTX 3080的玩家,价格低于2000欧元

处于攻击模式的豹子。

如果你想要一台配备RTX 3080和酷睿i7的合适的游戏笔记本电脑,那么这一定是一个高端型号,对吗?等等,你希望它的价格低于2000欧元?所以,我们来了,微星的15英寸Leopard加入了这场战斗!但是,它能满足其潜力吗?但它能发挥其潜力吗?我们把这个拥有高端硬件的经济型游戏机进行了测试,并引出了它的所有弱点,在这个价格上,它肯定应该有很多弱点。
Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Tiger Lake

早在4月,我们审查了前辈 微星GP66 Leopard 10UG配备彗星湖CPU,并对其重新设计的外壳表示赞赏。较新的GP66 Leopard 11UH现在配备了Tiger Lake CPU,外壳也有变化。但最重要的是,在配置RTX 3080的情况下,已经可以用不到2000欧元的价格购买到这款强大的游戏机了

GP66 11UH还配备了QHD显示屏或RTX 3070作为替代;我们的测试模型配备了快速全高清显示屏。

微星显然是配备RTX 3080的最便宜的游戏笔记本电脑之一,所以在这个价格范围内不容易找到合适的竞争对手。这就是为什么我们在这里也使用更昂贵的(高达+500欧元)模型进行比较。Aorus 15P YD,以及 华硕ROG Strix Scar 15、华硕ROG Strix Scar 15 申克XMG Neo 15以及贵得多的 兴发xf187在线娱乐Alienware m15 R6.

GP66 Leopard 11UH (GP66 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i7-11800H 8 x 2.3 - 4.6 GHz, 45 W PL2 / Short Burst, 45 W PL1 / Sustained, Tiger Lake-H
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU - 8 GB VRAM, 140 W TDP, Geforce 472.12, Optimus
Memory
16 GB 
, 16 GB DDR4-3200 (2x 8 GB Dual-Channel)
Display
15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, LGD0625 (LP156WFG-SPB3), IPS, glossy: no, 144 Hz
Mainboard
Intel HM570
Storage
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, 1024 GB 
, 960 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Tiger Lake PCH-H - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: Headset
Networking
Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675x (210NGW) (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth Bluetooth 5.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 23.4 x 358 x 267
Battery
65 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
FreeDos
Camera
Webcam: HD Webcam
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo Speaker, Keyboard Light: yes, 24 Months Warranty, with Pick-up & Return Service
Weight
2.305 kg, Power Supply: 1.062 kg
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible competitors in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
85.4 %
v7 (old)
12 / 2021
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
2.3 kg23.4 mm15.60"1920x1080
84.2 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2021
MSI GP66 Leopard 10UG
i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
2.3 kg23.4 mm15.60"1920x1080
86.4 %
v7 (old)
09 / 2021
Aorus 15P YD
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
2.2 kg27 mm15.60"1920x1080
86.3 %
v7 (old)
09 / 2021
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
2.3 kg27.2 mm15.60"2560x1440
87 %
v7 (old)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
2.2 kg26 mm15.60"2560x1440
86.1 %
v7 (old)
11 / 2021
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
2.5 kg22.85 mm15.60"1920x1080
前缘脱落
前缘脱落

盖子出奇的结实,理论上底座也是如此。然而,我们的测试样品有一些问题:当我们把底座按到触摸板的左边时,后者从触摸板上抬起,出现了很大的缝隙--这可能是触摸板响的原因。

总的来说,底座似乎只是很松散地连接到表面,而且前面的边缘也很快脱落,你在照片中也可以看到。这应该有利于维护,但另一方面,它在建造质量方面并没有真正给人留下好印象。不过,建筑本身看起来非常坚固,所以在没有缺陷的单位上应该是可以的。

由于其突出的冷却系统,GP66比其大多数对手更深。因此,它与Alienware非常相似,后者又深了5毫米。幸运的是,它不像后者那么重,而是与其他竞争者相当。除此以外,它是比较中最薄的设备之一。同样,只有新的Alienware更薄一点。

Size comparison

359.8 mm 243 mm 26 mm 2.2 kg357 mm 244 mm 27 mm 2.2 kg358 mm 267 mm 23.4 mm 2.3 kg358 mm 267 mm 23.4 mm 2.3 kg354 mm 259 mm 27.2 mm 2.3 kg356.2 mm 272.5 mm 22.85 mm 2.5 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

功能 - 老实说,微星,没有USB-C?

与它的前辈GP66 10UG相比,微星放弃了MiniDP端口,转而使用USB-C端口。在目前的GP66 11UH中,微星退了一步,带回了Mini DisplayPort,这是一个值得欢迎的举措。但是,制造商也取消了USB-C端口因此,GP66 Leopard是唯一没有USB-C端口的现代笔记本电脑!我们不知道微星为什么这样做,因为USB-C端口已经成为当今的绝对标准。因此,作为一个副作用,该笔记本电脑只有三个USB端口。也没有SD读卡器。

剩下的几个端口都很好地分布在三个侧面,即机箱的左、右和背面。微星公司在这里真的值得称赞,因为各种端口之间有很大的空间,这至少使人们对微薄的各种选择有了一定的认识。所有潜在的粗线(HDMI、DP、LAN、电源)都被放置在后面,而侧面只有USB-A和耳机接口--非常好。

右边:2个USB-A 3.0(注意:距离大)。
右边:2个USB-A 3.0(注意:距离大)。
左边:Kensington,USB-A 3.0,耳机插孔
左边:Kensington,USB-A 3.0,耳机插孔
后部。MiniDP,LAN,HDMI,电源
后部。MiniDP,LAN,HDMI,电源

沟通

微星用支持蓝牙5.2的杀手级Wi-Fi 6E AX1675取代了英特尔AX201。这并没有使Wi-Fi的速度提高很多。虽然它在千兆范围内,但它没有达到模块的潜力。特别是接收曲线有一个下降的斜率,但传输功率相当稳定。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1517 (1451min - 1574max) MBit/s +42%
Average Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675x (210NGW)
  (1066 - 1499, n=8)
1272 MBit/s +19%
Aorus 15P YD
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1265 (1163min - 1351max) MBit/s +19%
MSI GP66 Leopard 10UG
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1233 (631min - 1379max) MBit/s +16%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675x (210NGW)
1066 (902min - 1102max) MBit/s
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)
1026 (520min - 1143max) MBit/s -4%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
MediaTek MT7921
631 (581min - 693max) MBit/s -41%
iperf3 receive AX12
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1743 (864min - 1763max) MBit/s +68%
Average Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675x (210NGW)
  (1037 - 1469, n=8)
1309 MBit/s +26%
MSI GP66 Leopard 10UG
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1230 (781min - 1466max) MBit/s +19%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675x (210NGW)
1037 (502min - 1055max) MBit/s
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)
982 MBit/s -5%
Aorus 15P YD
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
933 (498min - 1012max) MBit/s -10%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
MediaTek MT7921
852 (831min - 887max) MBit/s -18%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100Tooltip
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø936 (502-1055)
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1066 (902-1102)

网络摄像头

一个标准的高清网络摄像头在Zoom、Teams和其他会议应用程序中最多只能提供可接受的图片。即使在光线良好的情况下,画面看起来也很模糊,而且颜色偏差相当明显,特别是在红色和绿色的颜色范围。

ColorChecker
9.2 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
10 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
9 ∆E
19.1 ∆E
7 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
15 ∆E
0 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
ColorChecker MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028: 10.38 ∆E min: 0 - max: 19.07 ∆E
Aorus 15P YDAorus 15P YD
Aorus 15P YD
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger LakeSCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028

安全问题

一个Kensington端口和TPM都在板上。然而,没有指纹扫描仪或其他安全技术--这对游戏笔记本来说是可以接受的。

维护

底板由至少10个十字螺丝(其中一个比其他所有螺丝都短)和各种锁扣固定。虽然我们的模型的前缘之前已经部分拆开,但事实证明维修比预期的要复杂。

前部边缘脱落得很好,但两侧和后部边缘却完全没有。特别是在耳机插座的地方,底板仍然被紧紧地锁住(不是直接在边缘,而是在里面),尽管有杠杆工具,我们还是不得不放弃打开的尝试,因为担心会损坏薄的塑料板。后边缘也没有屈服。隐藏的螺丝不应该是问题,至少在侧面是这样。

其内部结构应该类似于 MSI GP66 Leopard 10UG(见维修部分),但打开它也是有问题的。

10个螺丝钉中的1个比较短
10个螺丝钉中的1个比较短
在某个地方,它仍然锁在里面,而且后缘不屈服。
在某个地方,它仍然锁在里面,而且后缘不屈服。

配件和保修

除了电源之外,盒子里没有其他附件。注意:微星在运送GP66 Leopard时没有操作系统,但各种商店应该包括一个Windows许可证。

微星提供为期2年的保修,并提供提货和退货服务。

输入设备 - 良好的键盘,触摸板发出响声


键盘

电源按钮
电源按钮

尽管有15.6英寸的尺寸,Leopard并没有配备NumPad。另一方面,这确保了所有的按键都相当大,也有良好的间距。字母很大,易于阅读,即使选择的字体有点不寻常,这应该明确地吸引游戏玩家。电源键是键盘的一部分,位于右上角的位置。由于 "insert "和 "pos1 "的距离很近,它可能在文本处理过程中被无意地触发。

敲击的时间相当短,但反馈仍然很清晰。打字的噪音非常适中,只有空格键的声音最小。总的来说,在GP66上打字既有趣又快速。

fn按钮位于右侧,非常小。
fn按钮位于右侧,非常小。

微星很不常规地解决了一个问题:如此重要的 "fn "键不在左边,而是在右边,与右边的Ctrl键共享位置。一方面,这意味着你必须三思而后行,组合键有时会很别扭,因为你要么不能用双手来进行大范围的组合键,要么你必须用左手按第二个键。这个键也很窄,这特别不利,因为通常是用右手拇指按的。至少你还可以将fn键的功能与MSI中心的Windows键进行交换。

在这种情况下,有一个很酷的功能,但也有一个弱点:键盘有一个3段式背光。当按下fn键时,所有其他按键的照明会暂时关闭,只有F键的特殊功能,即现在可以与fn键组合的按键会亮起红色。然而,这个功能有一个缺点,因为如果我们改变背光的照明水平,我们不会立即看到这种变化的效果,因为亮起红色的特殊按键不会改变照明水平,这与其他按键不同。

键盘
键盘
奇特但可读的写作风格
奇特但可读的写作风格

触摸板

触摸板发出响声
触摸板发出响声

触摸板的尺寸约为10.5×6.5厘米,有内部点击按钮。表面的滑行能力很好,但在缓慢移动或潮湿的手指时,它显然会动摇。触摸板的下角也相当不精确。

正如一开始提到的,当你用手指轻轻敲击触摸板时,我们的测试模型的触摸板会发出响声。这很烦人,而且当你想用手指敲击来触发点击时也很响。

集成键的点击相当迟缓,特别是双击感觉不必要的费力,你宁愿用手指敲击来触发,这时嘎嘎声又出现了。总的来说,触摸板与键盘不同,并不是最好的数字。

显示

由于哑光覆盖,像素网格略带颗粒感
由于哑光覆盖,像素网格略带颗粒感

微星使用了LG Display的哑光全高清IPS面板,频率为144Hz。它与Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E 中的面板相同。它的平均亮度约为360尼特,是同类产品中最高的,而且其87%的分布率也很不错。另外,GP66也有配备QHD面板(2560 x 1440像素)。

黑值太高,这就是为什么对比度不能产生顶级速率的原因,但它仍然可以与竞争对手相媲美。只有Schenker XMG Neo在这里明显更好。当从侧面看带有黑色图像的显示器时,你可以清楚地看到强烈的背景光亮。随着亮度的降低,黑值自然会提高。

在我们的测试模型中,屏幕出血现象几乎不明显,由于磨砂表面的原因,像素网格有点颗粒感。面板的响应时间还可以,没有使用PWM。

屏幕出血几乎不可见
屏幕出血几乎不可见
面板发出强烈的光芒,这就是为什么黑值会变得太高的原因。
面板发出强烈的光芒,这就是为什么黑值会变得太高的原因。
374
cd/m²
364
cd/m²
365
cd/m²
349
cd/m²
390
cd/m²
386
cd/m²
338
cd/m²
342
cd/m²
347
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
LGD0625 (LP156WFG-SPB3) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 390 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 361.7 cd/m² Minimum: 20 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 390 cd/m²
Contrast: 951:1 (Black: 0.41 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.66 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 2.56
ΔE Greyscale 3.63 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
66% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
95.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.57
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
LGD0625 (LP156WFG-SPB3), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
MSI GP66 Leopard 10UG
Sharp LQ156M1JW03, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Aorus 15P YD
BOE09B9, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
BOE CQ NE156QHM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.6"
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
BOE CQ NE156QHM-NY2, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.6"
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
AU Optronics AUO9092 (B156HAN), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Display
5%
7%
28%
4%
11%
Display P3 Coverage
65.2
68.3
5%
70.2
8%
97.6
50%
68.6
5%
74.1
14%
sRGB Coverage
95.8
99.2
4%
98.5
3%
99.9
4%
98.6
3%
99.5
4%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
66
70.4
7%
72.4
10%
85.3
29%
69.3
5%
75.7
15%
Response Times
7%
6%
-8%
-13%
64%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
14 ?(7, 7)
13.6 ?(7.6, 6)
3%
14 ?(7.2, 6.8)
-0%
14 ?(7.2, 6.8)
-0%
16 ?(8.4, 7.6)
-14%
2.8
80%
Response Time Black / White *
10.8 ?(6.2, 4.6)
9.6 ?(5.2, 4.4)
11%
9.6 ?(5.2, 4.4)
11%
12.4 ?(7.2, 5.2)
-15%
12 ?(6, 6)
-11%
5.6
48%
PWM Frequency
23580 ?(34)
Screen
-15%
-7%
-3%
-4%
-1%
Brightness middle
390
225.9
-42%
337
-14%
304.3
-22%
324
-17%
359
-8%
Brightness
362
211
-42%
316
-13%
286
-21%
307
-15%
344
-5%
Brightness Distribution
87
83
-5%
85
-2%
76
-13%
91
5%
85
-2%
Black Level *
0.41
0.23
44%
0.31
24%
0.33
20%
0.27
34%
0.35
15%
Contrast
951
982
3%
1087
14%
922
-3%
1200
26%
1026
8%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.66
3.98
-50%
3.87
-45%
2.76
-4%
3.36
-26%
3.3
-24%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
7.14
8.95
-25%
8.09
-13%
5.57
22%
9.87
-38%
4.84
32%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
2.56
1.15
55%
1.15
55%
2.38
7%
1.23
52%
3.28
-28%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.63
6.4
-76%
6.1
-68%
4
-10%
5.8
-60%
3.66
-1%
Gamma
2.57 86%
2.25 98%
2.132 103%
2.14 103%
2.311 95%
2.43 91%
CCT
6894 94%
6991 93%
6891 94%
6844 95%
7087 92%
5896 110%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
64.5
72
69
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.3
94
93
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-1% / -8%
2% / -2%
6% / 3%
-4% / -4%
25% / 11%

* ... smaller is better

在色彩空间覆盖方面,竞争对手只是略胜一筹。只有华硕ROG在这里明显领先,因为它也几乎完全覆盖了AdobeRGB,而我们的MSI只覆盖了66%。因此,华硕更适合用于图像编辑。

显示屏在出厂前的配置很好,手动校准并不能改善它。

灰度
灰度
饱和度
饱和度
颜色检测器
颜色检测器
灰度标定
灰度标定
饱和度校验
饱和度校验
校准的ColorChecker
校准的ColorChecker

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
10.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6.2 ms rise
↘ 4.6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
14 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7 ms rise
↘ 7 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 24 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

由于良好的亮度和哑光表面,在户外的能见度很好--至少在阴凉处和直接俯视时是如此。应避免阳光直射以及斜视角度。

在厚厚的云层覆盖下的室外
在厚厚的云层覆盖下的室外
在斜视角度下,颜色略微褪色
在斜视角度下,颜色略微褪色

当从极端角度观看时,特别是失去了一些亮度,但只是非常少,因为这是典型的IPS,而且内容仍然可以很好地被识别。

性能 - 只有CPU受益于MSI中心

微星的Leopard是一款游戏笔记本电脑,这一点由RTX 3080表示。理论上,这款笔记本电脑应该能够在原生分辨率下流畅地渲染所有当前的游戏,也有足够的储备用于4K分辨率。

测试条件

我们在还没有安装MSI中心的时候进行了所有的基准测试。毕竟,GP66只在官方出货时装有FreeDOS,没有Windows许可证。我们的测试装置的Windows性能滑块总是被设置为 "最佳性能 "来进行性能基准测试。

另一方面,MSI中心使用其他性能模式,这些模式隐藏在 "用户场景 "下。我们将在性能部分探讨与Windows模式的区别。在微星的设置中,你也可以选择混合图形模式或仅有独立GPU。

MSI中心。概述
MSI中心。概述
更多的性能模式,遗憾的是没有对TDP/TGP的变化做出具体描述
更多的性能模式,遗憾的是没有对TDP/TGP的变化做出具体描述
GPU开关、网络摄像头和其他首选项
GPU开关、网络摄像头和其他首选项

处理器

与目前许多英特尔游戏笔记本电脑一样,微星Leopard配备了一个 英特尔酷睿i7-11800H处理器。它有八个核心,每个核心的时钟从2.3到4.6GHz。当所有核心都处于负载状态时,最高时钟可以达到4.2GHz。

在我们的Cinebench循环中,性能只下降了很少,总的来说,GP 66 11UH比它的前辈快了大约25%。通过HWinfo,我们可以看到CPU在开始时允许自己使用80W,但接下来的运行反而以75W开始,最后以53W结束。

极限性能 "模式特别有利于CPU的功率。CPU甚至可以在短时间内允许自己使用90W,而不是之前的75W,在一次运行中迅速恢复到74W而不是53W。然而,即使在极限模式下,GP66也不能完全达到无节制的XMG Neo或华硕ROG的AMD CPU的性能。

电池电量的表现明显下降:从以前的2000分左右,只剩下1178分。

采用Windows电源计划的CPU的TDP
采用Windows电源计划的CPU的TDP
采用微星极致性能模式的CPU的TDP
采用微星极致性能模式的CPU的TDP

Cinebench R15 Multi endurance test

01102203304405506607708809901100121013201430154016501760187019802090Tooltip
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028 Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø1910 (1886.79-2011.67)
MSI GP66 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10870H: Ø1588 (1533.86-1615.18)
Aorus 15P YD Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø1808 (1756.39-1935.92)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø2153 (2123.03-2172.97)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX: Ø2175 (2157.5-2197.2)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
Average of class Gaming
 
83.8 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H
61.8 pt
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Intel Core i7-11800H
57.9 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS -2!
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
57.8 pt
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H
57.3 pt
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
 
54.8 pt
Aorus 15P YD -2!
Intel Core i7-11800H
53.9 pt
MSI GP66 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10870H
48.4 pt
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Average of class Gaming
  (5668 - 36249, n=193, last 2 years)
21651 Points +72%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H
14088 Points +12%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
13519 (13222.6min - 13519.5max) Points +8%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H
13477 Points +7%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Intel Core i7-11800H
12563 Points
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (6508 - 14088, n=48)
11650 Points -7%
MSI GP66 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10870H
10031 (9629.77min - 10030.6max) Points -20%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Average of class Gaming
  (1088 - 2235, n=191, last 2 years)
1877 Points +23%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Intel Core i7-11800H
1522 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H
1520 Points 0%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (1386 - 1522, n=45)
1497 Points -2%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H
1481 Points -3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1469 Points -3%
MSI GP66 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10870H
1253 Points -18%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (2179 - 13832, n=191, last 2 years)
8240 Points +71%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H
5408 Points +12%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
5214 Points +8%
Aorus 15P YD
Intel Core i7-11800H
4920 Points +2%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Intel Core i7-11800H
4810 Points
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H
4532 Points -6%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (2498 - 5408, n=50)
4459 Points -7%
MSI GP66 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10870H
3892 Points -19%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (427 - 856, n=191, last 2 years)
722 Points +24%
Aorus 15P YD
Intel Core i7-11800H
583 Points 0%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Intel Core i7-11800H
582 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H
581 Points 0%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H
577 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (520 - 586, n=47)
576 Points -1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
574 Points -1%
MSI GP66 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10870H
484 Points -17%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (905 - 5663, n=198, last 2 years)
3394 Points +69%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
2197 (2157.5min - 2197.2max) Points +9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H
2173 (2123.03min - 2172.97max) Points +8%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H
2134 (1720.8min - 2133.9max) Points +6%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Intel Core i7-11800H
2012 (1886.79min - 2011.67max) Points
Aorus 15P YD
Intel Core i7-11800H
1936 (1756.39min - 1935.92max) Points -4%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (1342 - 2173, n=50)
1894 Points -6%
MSI GP66 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10870H
1615 (1533.86min - 1615.18max) Points -20%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (176.6 - 318, n=195, last 2 years)
276 Points +21%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
234 Points +2%
Aorus 15P YD
Intel Core i7-11800H
230 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H
230 Points 0%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Intel Core i7-11800H
229 Points
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H
226 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (201 - 231, n=46)
225 Points -2%
MSI GP66 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10870H
201 Points -12%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Aorus 15P YD
Intel Core i7-11800H
291 Seconds * -19%
MSI GP66 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10870H
279 Seconds * -14%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (217 - 454, n=46)
277 Seconds * -14%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H
265 Seconds * -9%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Intel Core i7-11800H
244 Seconds *
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
240 Seconds * +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H
217 Seconds * +11%
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 555, n=186, last 2 years)
172.1 Seconds * +29%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Average of class Gaming
  (23795 - 140932, n=190, last 2 years)
84653 MIPS +58%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
61422 MIPS +15%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H
56758 MIPS +6%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Intel Core i7-11800H
53564 MIPS
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H
52729 MIPS -2%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (33718 - 56758, n=46)
48384 MIPS -10%
Aorus 15P YD
Intel Core i7-11800H
47604 MIPS -11%
MSI GP66 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10870H
46336 MIPS -13%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Gaming
  (4168 - 7581, n=190, last 2 years)
6281 MIPS +13%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H
5716 MIPS +3%
Aorus 15P YD
Intel Core i7-11800H
5582 MIPS 0%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Intel Core i7-11800H
5569 MIPS
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
5568 MIPS 0%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (5138 - 5732, n=46)
5492 MIPS -1%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H
5450 MIPS -2%
MSI GP66 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10870H
5429 MIPS -3%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Average of class Gaming
  (4557 - 23194, n=191, last 2 years)
14891 Points +59%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H
9851 Points +5%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H
9395 Points 0%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Intel Core i7-11800H
9379 Points
Aorus 15P YD
Intel Core i7-11800H
9335 Points 0%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (4655 - 9851, n=40)
8551 Points -9%
MSI GP66 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10870H
7882 Points -16%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Average of class Gaming
  (986 - 2210, n=191, last 2 years)
1882 Points +19%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H
1625 Points +3%
Aorus 15P YD
Intel Core i7-11800H
1582 Points 0%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Intel Core i7-11800H
1578 Points
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H
1574 Points 0%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (1429 - 1625, n=40)
1561 Points -1%
MSI GP66 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10870H
1292 Points -18%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (6.72 - 38.9, n=190, last 2 years)
23.3 fps +50%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H
17.4 fps +12%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
15.6 fps +1%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Intel Core i7-11800H
15.5 fps
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (7.38 - 17.4, n=46)
13.8 fps -11%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H
13.6 fps -12%
MSI GP66 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10870H
13.2 fps -15%
Aorus 15P YD
Intel Core i7-11800H
12.6 fps -19%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
52.3 s * -8%
MSI GP66 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10870H
49.2 s * -1%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Intel Core i7-11800H
48.6 s *
Average of class Gaming
  (31.4 - 96.6, n=187, last 2 years)
47.6 s * +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H
46.8 s * +4%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (38.6 - 59.9, n=45)
46.5 s * +4%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H
44.5 s * +8%
Aorus 15P YD
Intel Core i7-11800H
43.8 s * +10%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
MSI GP66 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10870H
0.579 sec * -2%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Intel Core i7-11800H
0.566 sec *
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (0.548 - 0.615, n=46)
0.566 sec * -0%
Aorus 15P YD
Intel Core i7-11800H
0.56 sec * +1%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H
0.558 sec * +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H
0.556 sec * +2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
0.4908 sec * +13%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 0.759, n=191, last 2 years)
0.4402 sec * +22%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2012 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
193 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
229 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
4810 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
582 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
1522 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
12563 Points
Help
Performance Rating
Average of class Gaming
 
96.9 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
80.8 pt
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
74.6 pt
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
71.3 pt
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
 
63.3 pt
MSI GP66 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
56 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming
  (4986 - 60169, n=187, last 2 years)
21640 KRay/s +47%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
15961 KRay/s +8%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
15150 KRay/s +3%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
14722 KRay/s
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (8772 - 15961, n=20)
13481 KRay/s -8%
MSI GP66 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
11860 KRay/s -19%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Average of class Gaming
  (25360 - 252486, n=187, last 2 years)
106090 Points +72%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
100744 Points +64%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
65636 Points +7%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
61519 Points
MSI GP66 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
59126 Points -4%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (39404 - 65636, n=20)
57444 Points -7%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average of class Gaming
  (1339 - 10389, n=187, last 2 years)
4852 MB/s +18%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
4439 MB/s +8%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
4129 MB/s
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (2599 - 4439, n=20)
3855 MB/s -7%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
3412 MB/s -17%
MSI GP66 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
2995 MB/s -27%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Average of class Gaming
  (50699 - 200651, n=187, last 2 years)
116237 Points +26%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
102329 Points +11%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
91941 Points
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
91757 Points 0%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (85233 - 91941, n=20)
90603 Points -1%
MSI GP66 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
87019 Points -5%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Average of class Gaming
  (4800 - 32988, n=187, last 2 years)
13175 Points +35%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
12610 Points +29%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
9787 Points
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
9781 Points 0%
MSI GP66 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
9625 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (6420 - 9792, n=20)
9145 Points -7%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
55702 Points +52%
Average of class Gaming
  (12321 - 134044, n=187, last 2 years)
53471 Points +46%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
39464 Points +8%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
36578 Points
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (23365 - 39464, n=20)
34552 Points -6%
MSI GP66 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
29480 Points -19%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
149388 MB/s +1%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
147287 MB/s
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
132655 MB/s -10%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (74617 - 149388, n=20)
123317 MB/s -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (19065 - 328679, n=187, last 2 years)
109176 MB/s -26%
MSI GP66 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
36399 MB/s -75%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average of class Gaming
  (373 - 2409, n=187, last 2 years)
1349 MB/s +72%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
841 MB/s +7%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
830 MB/s +6%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
784 MB/s
MSI GP66 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
708 MB/s -10%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (461 - 830, n=43)
358 (461min - 830max) MB/s -54%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming
  (2540 - 31796, n=187, last 2 years)
11654 KRay/s +47%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
8717 KRay/s +10%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
8644 KRay/s +9%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
7926 KRay/s
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (4545 - 8717, n=21)
7332 KRay/s -7%
MSI GP66 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
6268 KRay/s -21%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Average of class Gaming
  (10805 - 60161, n=188, last 2 years)
39919 MPixel/s +72%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
25533 MPixel/s +10%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
23347 MPixel/s +1%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
23153 MPixel/s
MSI GP66 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
22586 MPixel/s -2%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (11898 - 26757, n=21)
22376 MPixel/s -3%

系统性能

Leopard在PCMark 10中的表现大致符合预期水平。尽管如此,对手往往略胜一筹,但这更可能是由于测量的准确性造成的。

PCMark 10 / Score
Average of class Gaming
  (5776 - 9852, n=168, last 2 years)
7774 Points +10%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
7201 Points +2%
Aorus 15P YD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7191 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
7190 Points +2%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7177 Points +2%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (6673 - 7470, n=11)
7154 Points +1%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7066 Points
MSI GP66 Leopard 10UG
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Kingston OM8PCP31024F
6630 Points -6%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Average of class Gaming
  (9057 - 12334, n=167, last 2 years)
10836 Points +6%
Aorus 15P YD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10528 Points +3%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (9862 - 11064, n=11)
10328 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
10271 Points +1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
10218 Points 0%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10208 Points
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
9934 Points -3%
MSI GP66 Leopard 10UG
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Kingston OM8PCP31024F
9518 Points -7%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
10066 Points +15%
Average of class Gaming
  (6662 - 14612, n=167, last 2 years)
9878 Points +12%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
9372 Points +7%
Aorus 15P YD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
9188 Points +5%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (8278 - 9803, n=11)
9115 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
8983 Points +2%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8784 Points
MSI GP66 Leopard 10UG
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Kingston OM8PCP31024F
8204 Points -7%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Average of class Gaming
  (6703 - 18475, n=167, last 2 years)
12030 Points +13%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
10932 Points +2%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10775 Points +1%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10677 Points
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (9881 - 11323, n=11)
10560 Points -1%
Aorus 15P YD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10434 Points -2%
MSI GP66 Leopard 10UG
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Kingston OM8PCP31024F
10130 Points -5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
9852 Points -8%
PCMark 10 Score
7066 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Average of class Gaming
  (21842 - 94222, n=187, last 2 years)
64907 MB/s +48%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
43938 MB/s
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
43361 MB/s -1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
43318 MB/s -1%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (24508 - 48144, n=21)
42778 MB/s -3%
MSI GP66 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
39817 MB/s -9%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Average of class Gaming
  (23681 - 99713, n=187, last 2 years)
68658 MB/s +37%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
50013 MB/s
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
49659 MB/s -1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
45841 MB/s -8%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (25882 - 50365, n=20)
45259 MB/s -10%
MSI GP66 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
44088 MB/s -12%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Average of class Gaming
  (22986 - 108954, n=187, last 2 years)
66727 MB/s +46%
MSI GP66 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
46234 MB/s +1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
46062 MB/s +1%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
45566 MB/s
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
45486 MB/s 0%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (22240 - 46214, n=20)
42489 MB/s -7%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
97.5 ns * -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (59.5 - 259, n=187, last 2 years)
94.1 ns * -2%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
92.6 ns *
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
85.3 ns * +8%
MSI GP66 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
54.2 ns * +41%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (71.9 - 104.1, n=44)
43.3 (71.9min - 104.1max) ns * +53%
Aorus 15P YD
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
0 ns * +100%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
0 ns * +100%

* ... smaller is better

DPC延迟

GP66在处理几个打开的浏览器标签或我们的4K/60 fps YouTube视频时有延迟问题。Leopard在测试视频中每秒钟都会收集掉帧,最后是64帧。在其他方面,NT内核和系统驱动是有问题的。竞争对手也有类似的高延迟率,但除了Alienware之外,在视频播放方面管理得更好。

录像带
录像带
LatencyMon主页
LatencyMon主页
LatencyMon主要驱动因素
LatencyMon主要驱动因素
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
1380 μs * -66%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
961 μs * -16%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
829 μs *
Aorus 15P YD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
775 μs * +7%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
533 μs * +36%
MSI GP66 Leopard 10UG
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Kingston OM8PCP31024F
461.1 μs * +44%

* ... smaller is better

储存

三星公司安装的具有1TB存储空间的NVMe固态硬盘非常快(SSD/HDD最佳列表然而,其最高性能在耐力测试中下降了一半以上。这在日常使用中应该很难注意到,其余的耐力性能仍然比较高。

AS SSD
AS SSD
AS SSD复制
AS SSD复制
Crystaldiskmark 8
Crystaldiskmark 8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
Sequential Read: 5189MB/s
Sequential Write: 3941MB/s
4K Read: 84.8MB/s
4K Write: 208.8MB/s
4K-64 Read: 2749MB/s
4K-64 Write: 3152MB/s
Access Time Read: 0.035ms
Access Time Write: 0.02ms
Copy ISO: 3322MB/s
Copy Program: 387.6MB/s
Copy Game: 1237MB/s
Score Read: 3353Points
Score Write: 3755Points
Score Total: 8764Points
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
95.9 pt
Aorus 15P YD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
86.8 pt
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
 
79 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
78 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
71.3 pt
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
65.2 pt
MSI GP66 Leopard 10UG
Kingston OM8PCP31024F
37 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
26.2 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4608 (4598.43min - 4608.49max) MB/s
Aorus 15P YD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3941 (3833.9min - 3941.39max) MB/s -14%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (1761 - 4677, n=85)
3764 MB/s -18%
Average of class Gaming
  (1319 - 7045, n=168, last 2 years)
3487 MB/s -24%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3385 (3365.72min - 3385.43max) MB/s -27%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2514 (2492.51min - 2513.65max) MB/s -45%
MSI GP66 Leopard 10UG
Kingston OM8PCP31024F
1352 (1335.68min - 1352.47max) MB/s -71%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
1160 (560.08min - 1160.14max) MB/s -75%
seq write
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4304 (4297.69min - 4303.57max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (535 - 9307, n=168, last 2 years)
3797 MB/s -12%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (2220 - 4564, n=85)
3578 MB/s -17%
Aorus 15P YD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2923 (2797.18min - 2923.46max) MB/s -32%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
2842 (2816.48min - 2842.27max) MB/s -34%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2753 (2740.35min - 2752.51max) MB/s -36%
MSI GP66 Leopard 10UG
Kingston OM8PCP31024F
1659 (1636.87min - 1658.85max) MB/s -61%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
1156 (590.64min - 1155.74max) MB/s -73%
seq q8 t1 read
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6670 (5988min - 6670.2max) MB/s
Aorus 15P YD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6598 (5839.52min - 6597.87max) MB/s -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
6574 (5853.99min - 6573.59max) MB/s -1%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (3421 - 7100, n=85)
6477 MB/s -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (2594 - 16089, n=168, last 2 years)
6328 MB/s -5%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3421 (3159.78min - 3420.66max) MB/s -49%
MSI GP66 Leopard 10UG
Kingston OM8PCP31024F
2096 (1319.2min - 2096.31max) MB/s -69%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
1741 (791.56min - 1740.72max) MB/s -74%
seq q8 t1 write
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4933 (4925.79min - 4932.71max) MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4920 (4893.91min - 4919.52max) MB/s 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (539 - 14571, n=168, last 2 years)
4823 MB/s -2%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (2216 - 5281, n=85)
4814 MB/s -2%
Aorus 15P YD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4786 (4775.73min - 4785.78max) MB/s -3%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3134 (3124.55min - 3133.56max) MB/s -36%
MSI GP66 Leopard 10UG
Kingston OM8PCP31024F
1665 (1644.65min - 1665.32max) MB/s -66%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
1185 (657.19min - 1184.83max) MB/s -76%
4k q1 t1 read
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
93 (91.02min - 93.04max) MB/s
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
80.1 (78.53min - 80.11max) MB/s -14%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
77.3 (77.09min - 77.34max) MB/s -17%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (48.4 - 97.4, n=85)
76.7 MB/s -18%
Average of class Gaming
  (30.6 - 95.9, n=168, last 2 years)
65.8 MB/s -29%
Aorus 15P YD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
61 (60.47min - 61.04max) MB/s -34%
MSI GP66 Leopard 10UG
Kingston OM8PCP31024F
42.9 (42.62min - 42.89max) MB/s -54%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
23.3 (23.23min - 23.32max) MB/s -75%
4k q1 t1 write
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
237 (236.29min - 237.08max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (66.6 - 397, n=168, last 2 years)
222 MB/s -6%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (49.9 - 280, n=85)
188.5 MB/s -20%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
184 (179.2min - 184.27max) MB/s -22%
Aorus 15P YD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
177 (170.46min - 177.28max) MB/s -25%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
169 (167.84min - 168.95max) MB/s -29%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
138 (137.2min - 137.78max) MB/s -42%
MSI GP66 Leopard 10UG
Kingston OM8PCP31024F
134 (133.3min - 134.07max) MB/s -43%
4k q32 t16 read
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4183 (4180.32min - 4183.47max) MB/s
Aorus 15P YD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4181 (4173.58min - 4181.23max) MB/s 0%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3492 (3485.59min - 3492.13max) MB/s -17%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (376 - 4185, n=85)
2579 MB/s -38%
Average of class Gaming
  (417 - 6172, n=168, last 2 years)
2555 MB/s -39%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1271 (1259.92min - 1271.12max) MB/s -70%
MSI GP66 Leopard 10UG
Kingston OM8PCP31024F
594 (592.02min - 593.97max) MB/s -86%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
439 (211.56min - 439max) MB/s -90%
4k q32 t16 write
Aorus 15P YD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3554 (2877.78min - 3553.71max) MB/s 0%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3549 (3537.38min - 3548.54max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (162.3 - 4869, n=168, last 2 years)
2101 MB/s -41%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (291 - 3559, n=85)
1957 MB/s -45%
MSI GP66 Leopard 10UG
Kingston OM8PCP31024F
1679 (1660min - 1678.71max) MB/s -53%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1076 (1068.95min - 1075.63max) MB/s -70%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
618 (524.5min - 618max) MB/s -83%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
470 (454.64min - 470.28max) MB/s -87%
AS SSD
Score Total
Aorus 15P YD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8804 Points 0%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8764 Points
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (2577 - 9147, n=85)
6855 Points -22%
Average of class Gaming
  (2271 - 13854, n=159, last 2 years)
6737 Points -23%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
6724 Points -23%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5683 Points -35%
MSI GP66 Leopard 10UG
Kingston OM8PCP31024F
3032 Points -65%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
1814 Points -79%
Score Read
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3353 Points
Aorus 15P YD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3314 Points -1%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2955 Points -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (776 - 4721, n=159, last 2 years)
2441 Points -27%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (983 - 3469, n=85)
2417 Points -28%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1850 Points -45%
MSI GP66 Leopard 10UG
Kingston OM8PCP31024F
779 Points -77%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
637 Points -81%
Score Write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4058 Points +8%
Aorus 15P YD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3890 Points +4%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3755 Points
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (921 - 4043, n=85)
3272 Points -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (515 - 7208, n=159, last 2 years)
3113 Points -17%
MSI GP66 Leopard 10UG
Kingston OM8PCP31024F
1854 Points -51%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1230 Points -67%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
882 Points -77%
Seq Read
Aorus 15P YD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5376 MB/s +4%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5189 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (2260 - 12763, n=159, last 2 years)
4944 MB/s -5%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (2638 - 5621, n=85)
4891 MB/s -6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4830 MB/s -7%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2834 MB/s -45%
MSI GP66 Leopard 10UG
Kingston OM8PCP31024F
1806 MB/s -65%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
1757 MB/s -66%
Seq Write
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3941 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (495 - 11316, n=159, last 2 years)
3720 MB/s -6%
Aorus 15P YD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3669 MB/s -7%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (1617 - 4526, n=85)
3320 MB/s -16%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2544 MB/s -35%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
2032 MB/s -48%
MSI GP66 Leopard 10UG
Kingston OM8PCP31024F
1589 MB/s -60%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
1071 MB/s -73%
4K Read
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
84.8 MB/s
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
72.7 MB/s -14%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (45.9 - 89.2, n=85)
72.4 MB/s -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (27.8 - 112.1, n=159, last 2 years)
65.1 MB/s -23%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
62.3 MB/s -27%
Aorus 15P YD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
56.5 MB/s -33%
MSI GP66 Leopard 10UG
Kingston OM8PCP31024F
40.09 MB/s -53%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
22.07 MB/s -74%
4K Write
Average of class Gaming
  (108.8 - 512, n=159, last 2 years)
211 MB/s +1%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
208.8 MB/s
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (118.6 - 246, n=85)
186 MB/s -11%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
167.7 MB/s -20%
Aorus 15P YD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
157.7 MB/s -24%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
146.4 MB/s -30%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
124.2 MB/s -41%
MSI GP66 Leopard 10UG
Kingston OM8PCP31024F
103.8 MB/s -50%
4K-64 Read
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2749 MB/s
Aorus 15P YD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2720 MB/s -1%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2598 MB/s -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (451 - 3475, n=159, last 2 years)
1876 MB/s -32%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (421 - 2854, n=85)
1855 MB/s -33%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1305 MB/s -53%
MSI GP66 Leopard 10UG
Kingston OM8PCP31024F
559 MB/s -80%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
439.4 MB/s -84%
4K-64 Write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3708 MB/s +18%
Aorus 15P YD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3366 MB/s +7%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3152 MB/s
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (367 - 3451, n=85)
2754 MB/s -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (277 - 5909, n=159, last 2 years)
2533 MB/s -20%
MSI GP66 Leopard 10UG
Kingston OM8PCP31024F
1591 MB/s -50%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
808 MB/s -74%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
651 MB/s -79%
Access Time Read
MSI GP66 Leopard 10UG
Kingston OM8PCP31024F
0.079 ms * -126%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.016 - 0.379, n=158, last 2 years)
0.05509 ms * -57%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
0.043 ms * -23%
Aorus 15P YD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.04 ms * -14%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (0.018 - 0.083, n=84)
0.03777 ms * -8%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.036 ms * -3%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.035 ms *
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
0.029 ms * +17%
Access Time Write
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
0.341 ms * -1605%
MSI GP66 Leopard 10UG
Kingston OM8PCP31024F
0.104 ms * -420%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.011 - 1.028, n=159, last 2 years)
0.04843 ms * -142%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (0.017 - 0.101, n=85)
0.03406 ms * -70%
Aorus 15P YD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.027 ms * -35%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
0.027 ms * -35%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.025 ms * -25%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.02 ms *

* ... smaller is better

Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

033567010051340167520102345268030153350368540204355469050255360569560306365Tooltip
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028: Ø3593 (1954.97-6678.59)

图形卡

除了集成了CPU的英特尔UHD Graphics Xe (32EUs)笔记本电脑有独立的 英伟达GeForce RTX 3080笔记本电脑GPU以确保流畅的帧速率。该GPU被允许消耗140瓦,包括动态提升,而Schenker XMG Neo中的相同卡允许自己使用完整的165瓦。 RTX 3070配备。

因此,Schenker在3DMarks中经常领先几个百分点,但Leopard可以在其他竞争中领先。

在3DMark 11中,图形性能因电池电量而大幅下降,整整下降了65%。在TheWitcher 3(Ultra)中,帧率从良好的120帧自发下降到只有无法播放的11帧!因此,移动游戏只有在做出非常大的牺牲后才有可能。

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming
 
94.8 pt
MSI GP66 Leopard 10UG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H
89.7 pt
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
87.4 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
85.5 pt
Aorus 15P YD
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
84.7 pt
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
83.1 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
 
80.5 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
77.1 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72178, n=186, last 2 years)
43521 Points +8%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
42087 Points +4%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
40384 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
39782 Points -1%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
38674 Points -4%
Aorus 15P YD
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
38409 Points -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (31288 - 43744, n=40)
38259 Points -5%
MSI GP66 Leopard 10UG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H
37100 Points -8%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
MSI GP66 Leopard 10UG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H
179716 Points +40%
Average of class Gaming
  (15902 - 193851, n=101, last 2 years)
142796 Points +11%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
128746 Points
Aorus 15P YD
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
128191 Points 0%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
123658 Points -4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (38816 - 192950, n=35)
116297 Points -10%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
96785 Points -25%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
78421 Points -39%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
31341 Points +2%
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=196, last 2 years)
31245 Points +1%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
30811 Points
Aorus 15P YD
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
29389 Points -5%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
28740 Points -7%
MSI GP66 Leopard 10UG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H
28490 Points -8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (16455 - 32366, n=46)
27420 Points -11%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
26956 Points -13%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22717, n=191, last 2 years)
13034 Points +15%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
11916 Points +5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
11396 Points 0%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
11346 Points
Aorus 15P YD
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
11129 Points -2%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
10836 Points -4%
MSI GP66 Leopard 10UG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H
10779 Points -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (6407 - 13210, n=45)
10681 Points -6%
3DMark 11 Performance
30689 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
51452 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
24909 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
11030 points
Help

游戏性能

微星以全高清显示所有测试的游戏,即使是在100帧左右的超级设置下。因此,仍有足够的空间来显示4K内容。

相比之下,Leopard的表现相当不错,但配备RTX 3080的竞争对手之间的差异相当小。只有配备165W RTX的XMG Neo可以稍微超过微星,这取决于游戏。

在极限性能模式下,我们在《Witcher 3》(Ultra)中取得了略低于5%的收益。GPU显然比CPU从该模式中受益更具有决定性。

The Witcher 3
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing
Average of class Gaming
  (108.2 - 718, n=99, last 2 years)
453 fps +31%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
427 (363min) fps +24%
MSI GP66 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
362.7 (318min) fps +5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (151 - 465, n=28)
360 fps +4%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
344.8 fps
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
325 (302min) fps -6%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
312 fps -10%
1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing
Average of class Gaming
  (168.5 - 617, n=102, last 2 years)
361 fps +20%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
311 (269min) fps +4%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
300 fps
MSI GP66 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
298.1 (276min) fps -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (236 - 374, n=25)
291 fps -3%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
276 fps -8%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
270.1 (257min) fps -10%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average of class Gaming
  (35.6 - 449, n=125, last 2 years)
238 fps +21%
MSI GP66 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
206.9 (189min) fps +5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
198 (174min) fps +1%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
196.5 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (149 - 242, n=32)
190.8 fps -3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
189.5 (186min) fps -4%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
149 fps -24%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (18.4 - 216, n=168, last 2 years)
126.9 fps +15%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
110.2 fps
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
108.4 fps -2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
108 (88min) fps -2%
MSI GP66 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
107.9 (102min) fps -2%
Aorus 15P YD
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
107 (86min) fps -3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
105.8 (100min) fps -4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (85.1 - 123, n=40)
105.1 fps -5%
Far Cry 5
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming
  (38 - 248, n=86, last 2 years)
145.6 fps +18%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
132 (105min) fps +7%
Aorus 15P YD
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
128 fps +4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (84 - 162, n=26)
127.5 fps +4%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
126 fps +2%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
123 fps
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming
  (35 - 232, n=100, last 2 years)
139.4 fps +17%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
127 (94min) fps +7%
Aorus 15P YD
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
124 fps +4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (79 - 155, n=28)
121.7 fps +2%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
119 fps 0%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
119 fps
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming
  (34 - 218, n=103, last 2 years)
130.5 fps +18%
Aorus 15P YD
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
121 fps +9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
120 (95min) fps +8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (75 - 146, n=33)
113.7 fps +2%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
113 fps +2%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
111 fps
New World
1920x1080 Medium Video Quality
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
105.4 fps
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
95.7 fps -9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (80.8 - 105.4, n=4)
91.3 fps -13%
1920x1080 High Video Quality
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
96.7 fps
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
91.3 fps -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (75.1 - 96.7, n=4)
86 fps -11%
1920x1080 Very High Video Quality
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
90.4 fps
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
84 fps -7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (71.5 - 90.4, n=4)
80.2 fps -11%
GTA V
1920x1080 Normal/Off AF:4x
Average of class Gaming
  (79.6 - 187.7, n=124, last 2 years)
178.5 fps +1%
MSI GP66 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
177 (7.39min, 125P1) fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
177 (3.92min, 125P1) fps +1%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
176 (4.24min, 125P1) fps
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
174 (5.37min, 125P1) fps -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (160 - 182, n=29)
173.7 fps -1%
Aorus 15P YD
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
171 (11.4min, 111P1) fps -3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
170 (6.93min, 111P1) fps -3%
1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
172 (4.4min, 125P1) fps +4%
Average of class Gaming
  (24.2 - 187.1, n=146, last 2 years)
168.7 fps +2%
MSI GP66 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
166 (6.99min, 111P1) fps 0%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
166 (6.62min, 111P1) fps 0%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
166 (6.45min, 100P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (137 - 176, n=30)
162.8 fps -2%
Aorus 15P YD
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
161 (4.32min, 111P1) fps -3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
150 (21.4min, 100P1) fps -10%
1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Average of class Gaming
  (12.1 - 167.7, n=171, last 2 years)
113 fps +10%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
109 (6.01min, 76.9P1) fps +6%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
103 (5.25min, 66.7P1) fps
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
99.5 (11.1min, 71.4P1) fps -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (68.6 - 114.6, n=34)
97.7 fps -5%
Aorus 15P YD
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
97.4 (6.21min, 66.7P1) fps -5%
MSI GP66 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
96.6 (5.31min, 66.7P1) fps -6%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
94.5 (9.87min, 66.7P1) fps -8%
Dota 2 Reborn
1920x1080 high (2/3)
Average of class Gaming
  (31.6 - 244, n=189, last 2 years)
160 fps +12%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
154 (134.3min) fps +8%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
144 (126.1min) fps +1%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
143 (125.5min) fps
MSI GP66 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
141 (119.3min) fps -1%
Aorus 15P YD
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
141 (123.6min) fps -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (108.1 - 161, n=45)
134.5 fps -6%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
131 (112.1min) fps -8%
1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Average of class Gaming
  (30.8 - 220, n=190, last 2 years)
149.3 fps +11%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
146 (126.6min) fps +8%
MSI GP66 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
135 (110.8min) fps 0%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
135 (118.4min) fps 0%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
135 (118.5min) fps
Aorus 15P YD
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
133 (116.2min) fps -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (98 - 156, n=45)
126.5 fps -6%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
119 (103.6min) fps -12%
Strange Brigade
1920x1080 medium AA:medium AF:4
Average of class Gaming
  (58.5 - 508, n=141, last 2 years)
292 fps +9%
MSI GP66 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
279 (92.3min, 236P1) fps +4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
268 (124min, 205P1) fps 0%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
267 (60.3min, 206P1) fps
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
261 (86.1min, 204P1) fps -2%
Aorus 15P YD
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
256 (67.7min, 203P1) fps -4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (186 - 306, n=29)
254 fps -5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
212 (96.9min, 157P1) fps -21%
1920x1080 high AA:high AF:8
Average of class Gaming
  (49.4 - 465, n=155, last 2 years)
253 fps +13%
MSI GP66 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
225 (89min, 167P1) fps +1%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
223 (101min, 162P1) fps
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
221 (85.5min, 166P1) fps -1%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
216 (144min, 152P1) fps -3%
Aorus 15P YD
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
212 (72min, 159P1) fps -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (165 - 248, n=30)
212 fps -5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
191 (54.2min, 128P1) fps -14%
1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Gaming
  (38.9 - 421, n=182, last 2 years)
227 fps +15%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
197 (83.8min, 141P1) fps 0%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
197 (45.8min, 145P1) fps
MSI GP66 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
194 (67.7min, 145P1) fps -2%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
190 (119min, 134P1) fps -4%
Aorus 15P YD
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
188 (69.8min, 143P1) fps -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (117 - 219, n=34)
184 fps -7%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
174 (26.8min, 123P1) fps -12%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
1280x720 Lite Quality
Average of class Gaming
  (25.6 - 234, n=124, last 2 years)
197.2 fps
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
196 fps
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
179 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (123 - 199, n=27)
176.6 fps
Aorus 15P YD
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
176 fps
MSI GP66 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
175 fps
1920x1080 Standard Quality
Average of class Gaming
  (33.5 - 230, n=146, last 2 years)
153.5 fps +13%
MSI GP66 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
142 fps +4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
139 fps +2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
139 fps +2%
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
136 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (97 - 154, n=29)
134 fps -1%
Aorus 15P YD
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
133 fps -2%
1920x1080 High Quality
Average of class Gaming
  (19.2 - 201, n=184, last 2 years)
119 fps
Aorus 15P YD
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
106 fps
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
105 fps
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
105 fps
MSI GP66 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
103 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (55.5 - 115, n=34)
99.2 fps

Witcher 3,在GP66上以大约120 fps的速度开始。在最初的几分钟后,这一数值下降,并在相当稳定的110 fps的水平,这一数值在一小时后仍然保持。在这方面,笔记本电脑随着时间的推移只损失了微不足道的一部分性能。

Witcher 3 FPS Diagramm

0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU: Ø111.6 (103-120)
lowmed.highultra
GTA V (2015) 184 177 166 103
The Witcher 3 (2015) 344.8 300 196.5 110.2
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 168 151 143 135
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 136
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 121 107 85.7
Far Cry 5 (2018) 152 123 119 111
Strange Brigade (2018) 492 267 223 197
New World (2021) 132.7 105.4 96.7 90.4

排放 - 模范的风扇行为

噪声排放

风扇在空转时通常很安静,我们通常喜欢自适应的风扇行为,因为即使在重载后风扇也会很快平静下来。即使在 Witcher 3

,整整一个小时之后,风扇在大约30秒之后就大大地安静下来,并且在空转时发出相当安静的呼噜声。

在极限性能模式下,风扇在怠速时大部分时间也保持关闭状态,即使在重载后也能很快平静下来。然而,如果你另外激活 "冷却器提升",风扇会突然跳到最大速度,噪音达到58分贝。

平衡、极致性能和极致性能加冷却器提升之间的性能差异很有趣--它几乎不存在或几乎不存在!另一方面,它们之间有明显的差异。另一方面,噪音水平也有很大差异。我们在平衡状态下测得约47分贝,在极限性能下测得约53分贝(在此作为最大值输入),而上述的58分贝则是在冷却器提升的情况下测得的。

因此,GP66是平衡模式下最安静的笔记本电脑之一,也是使用Cooler Boost时最吵的笔记本电脑之一。我们没有发现任何电子噪音。

Noise Level

Idle
23 / 23 / 30.11 dB(A)
Load
41.86 / 53 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 23 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.532.436.52542.837.442.83145.241.245.24031.228.531.25035.127.135.16334.829.834.88035.127.435.110034.125.434.112530.52130.516026.419.126.420031.222.231.225028.720.828.731526.913.926.940032.813.432.850034.110.434.163032.68.732.680033.110.133.1100034.88.834.8125035.19.235.1160036.89.936.8200035.89.835.8250037.210.637.2315035.31135.3400033.411.333.4500031.811.531.8630027.611.727.6800025.611.725.61000019.111.619.11250015.512.315.5160001212.512SPL46.123.846.1N5.30.55.3median 32.6median 11.6median 32.6Delta4.12.94.131.332.431.336.937.436.935.341.235.324.328.524.325.627.125.630.329.830.327.827.427.828.125.428.130.92130.932.319.132.33422.23436.320.836.338.913.938.940.413.440.44010.44039.18.739.138.710.138.739.48.839.442.19.242.142.69.942.640.69.840.642.510.642.537.61137.637.411.337.436.311.536.333.111.733.129.111.729.124.911.624.917.612.317.613.512.513.551.423.851.47.80.57.8median 37.4median 11.6median 37.45.42.95.4hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseMSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
MSI GP66 Leopard 10UG
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Kingston OM8PCP31024F
Aorus 15P YD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
Noise
-5%
-12%
-8%
-12%
-2%
off / environment *
23
24.7
-7%
25
-9%
25.5
-11%
25
-9%
23
-0%
Idle Minimum *
23
26.8
-17%
26
-13%
25.5
-11%
27
-17%
23
-0%
Idle Average *
23
26.8
-17%
30
-30%
25.5
-11%
30
-30%
23
-0%
Idle Maximum *
30.11
26.8
11%
34
-13%
37.1
-23%
32
-6%
30
-0%
Load Average *
41.86
40.4
3%
43
-3%
39.2
6%
46
-10%
41.26
1%
Witcher 3 ultra *
47.79
48.8
-2%
50
-5%
50.5
-6%
52
-9%
53.4
-12%
Load Maximum *
53
57.2
-8%
57
-8%
51.8
2%
55
-4%
53.37
-1%

* ... smaller is better

温度

在游戏过程中,顶部和底部的热点高达54℃,这使玩家在竞争中处于中间位置。Alienware和Aorus的温度更高,而华硕和XMG的温度更低,但冷却系统的声音更大。

所有上述的测量都是在平衡模式下进行的。由于在更高的模式下,性能不会增加很多,至少在游戏中不会,由于风扇旋转得更快,温度可能会下降更多。

Max. Load
 49 °C49 °C49 °C 
 42 °C44 °C43 °C 
 29 °C29 °C28 °C 
Maximum: 49 °C
Average: 40.2 °C
47 °C46 °C44 °C
45 °C43 °C42 °C
28 °C29 °C29 °C
Maximum: 47 °C
Average: 39.2 °C
Power Supply (max.)  43 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-360 // 260 // 900 // FIRT 550-Pocket // Raytek Raynger ST // Fluke 62 Mini
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.7 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 43.9 °C / 111 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32 °C / 89.6 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-3.1 °C / -5.6 F).
1小时后见顶Witcher 3
1小时后见顶Witcher 3
1小时后的底面Witcher 3
1小时后的底面Witcher 3
1小时后供电Witcher 3
1小时后供电Witcher 3
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
MSI GP66 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
Aorus 15P YD
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
Heat
3%
-9%
-5%
-2%
-20%
Maximum Upper Side *
49
42.8
13%
49
-0%
43.4
11%
39
20%
61
-24%
Maximum Bottom *
47
50
-6%
57
-21%
48.2
-3%
50
-6%
58
-23%
Idle Upper Side *
31
33
-6%
33
-6%
35.2
-14%
34
-10%
38
-23%
Idle Bottom *
33
29
12%
36
-9%
37
-12%
37
-12%
36
-9%

* ... smaller is better

压力测试

CPU的8个核心以4.2GHz左右的频率开始我们的压力测试。然而,在核心温度在大约一分钟内达到96℃后,时钟速率被节制。它短暂地降到3GHz以下,但后来又超过了这个极限。我们在一小时后测量了大约3.3GHz,温度在82至86℃之间,取决于时钟速率。

在整个测试期间,GPU时钟在1.3和1.7GHz之间波动。GPU核心的温度最高达到76℃。

在压力测试之后,系统很快又平静了下来。在压力测试结束后直接运行另一个3DMark 11,得到的分数与之前大致相同。

CPU温度
CPU温度
开始进行压力测试
开始进行压力测试
30分钟后的压力测试
30分钟后的压力测试
一小时后的压力测试
一小时后的压力测试
CPU时钟(GHz) GPU时钟 平均CPU温度(℃) 平均GPU温度(℃)
系统空闲 4.5 GHz 350 MHz 35 32
Prime95 + FurMark压力 2.8 - 3.3 GHz 1.3 - 1.7 GHz 85 76
Witcher 3 Stress 4.2 GHz 1.3 - 1.7 GHz 85 76

扬声器

左侧扬声器和耳机接口
左侧扬声器和耳机接口

从积极的方面看,这些扬声器可以播放得相当响亮,而且中音和高音似乎相当平衡。然而,它们自然会受到所有传统笔记本电脑扬声器的共同抱怨--缺乏低音。外部音频设备,如耳机,可以通过模拟镀金的迷你插孔耳机端口连接。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2040.832.440.82541.637.441.63144.341.244.3403628.5365029.827.129.86332.129.832.18031.527.431.510032.525.432.512539.52139.516045.919.145.920050.922.250.925059.620.859.631563.613.963.640065.913.465.950072.510.472.563076.18.776.180074.510.174.5100073.98.873.91250749.274160072.39.972.3200074.59.874.5250071.810.671.8315071.61171.6400075.111.375.1500076.511.576.5630075.911.775.9800067.511.767.51000056.711.656.71250051.212.351.21600047.712.547.7SPL85.623.885.6N680.568median 71.6median 11.6median 71.6Delta9.52.99.543.13837.238.247.653.132.435.938.93926.431.619.322.522.224.318.231.32239.723.54517.850.115.550.414.854.212.660.213.467.911.670.912.168.911.865.711.9601264.312.364.414.463.314.164.813.462.713.672.213.671.61468.313.161.812.661.525.779.10.744.5median 13.6median 62.72.78.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 64% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 44% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理--带迷你电池的Leopard

能量吸收

我们在玩《Witcher 3》时测得的平均消耗为207瓦,这比竞争对手需要的要多一些。最大功率为223瓦,介于顶级消费者Aorus和Alienware以及更节俭的其他竞争对手之间。

电源的尺寸很大,有280瓦,充电时应该不会有任何问题。

Power Consumption
Idledarkmidlight 13 / 17 / 18 Watt
Load midlight 96 / 223 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
MSI GP66 Leopard 10UG
i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Kingston OM8PCP31024F, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Aorus 15P YD
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, ADATA Swordfish 2 TB, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.6"
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.6"
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
 
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-7%
-40%
-7%
-7%
-9%
-39%
-17%
Idle Minimum *
13
15.3
-18%
23
-77%
11.2
14%
15
-15%
14
-8%
19.8 ?(8 - 62, n=35)
-52%
Idle Average *
17
21.2
-25%
25
-47%
16.4
4%
17
-0%
18
-6%
24.3 ?(11.7 - 64, n=35)
-43%
Idle Maximum *
18
22.3
-24%
35
-94%
29.4
-63%
22
-22%
29
-61%
33.3 ?(12 - 69, n=35)
-85%
Load Average *
96
82.3
14%
101
-5%
106.2
-11%
101
-5%
93
3%
108.1 ?(81.2 - 183, n=35)
-13%
Witcher 3 ultra *
207
191.2
8%
190
8%
189
9%
195
6%
190
8%
Load Maximum *
223
216.6
3%
280
-26%
213.6
4%
230
-3%
203
9%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test

0153045607590105120135150165180195210225240Tooltip
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø207 (191.56-233.13)
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø171.9 (132.85-252.43)

电池寿命

微星使用65Wh的电池,这对于配备RTX 3080的游戏笔记本来说是非常小的。竞争对手的电池有84或90Wh,甚至更多!因此,离开插座的运行时间很差。

相应地,离开插座的运行时间很差,Leopard的预算价格在这里被注意到。只有3.5小时的冲浪或看视频的时间是令人失望的低,竞争对手的持续时间要长40%到100%(华硕ROG)。笔记本电脑只能提供四分之三小时的游戏时间(TheWitcher 3 )。

Battery Runtime
Witcher 3 ultra 150cd
0h 49min
WiFi Websurfing
3h 37min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness
3h 07min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
3h 27min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 9min
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, 65 Wh
MSI GP66 Leopard 10UG
i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 65 Wh
Aorus 15P YD
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, 99 Wh
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, 93 Wh
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, 84 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
15%
65%
63%
86%
47%
64%
H.264
207
352
70%
333
61%
WiFi v1.3
217
304
40%
319
47%
440
103%
338
56%
302
39%
Witcher 3 ultra
49
Load
69
62
-10%
126
83%
85
23%
161
133%
98
42%
Reader / Idle
398
448
668

Pros

+ 廉价的
+ 堪称典范的连接分布
+ 明亮的144赫兹IPS显示屏
+ 良好的CPU/GPU性能
+ 快速的SSD
+ 优秀的自适应冷却系统

Cons

- 箱子上的处理缺陷
- 没有USB-C接口
- 底板难以拆卸
- fn按钮的位置很奇怪
- 触摸板发出响声
- 电池运行时间短

结论 - 良好的预算高性能游戏机

豹式GP66 11UH-028,由数码港提供
豹式GP66 11UH-028,由数码港提供

一台现代游戏笔记本电脑,配备Nvidia RTX 3080和相应的高、有竞争力的性能,价格低于2000欧元,这在现在可能是很罕见的。尽管价格低廉,微星在纯粹的性能之外也做了很多事情。例如,自适应冷却系统确实给我们带来了积极的惊喜,即使是在极限性能模式下--像Alienwares这样更昂贵的竞争对手可以从这本书中吸取经验。显示屏也不是预算面板,但至少在亮度方面超过了竞争对手。

当然,你也必须接受这个价格类别中的一些妥协。这包括Leopard的电池运行时间不长,而且制造质量不尽如人意,这在比较复杂的维护中也很明显。我们几乎感到震惊的是,新的GP66型号不再有USB-C端口,这在2021年底就不再是最新的了!这也是我们的一个遗憾。如果你能克服这一点,目前你很难得到一个更便宜的RTX 3080游戏机,同时还能做得这么好。

Leopard GP66 11UH是一款经济型游戏笔记本,在某些地方甚至让高端机型显得很苍白。当然,也有缺点,如缺乏USB-C或电池运行时间低,但性能、冷却和显示也符合更高的类别。

在这个价格范围内,具有这些规格的竞争是罕见的。而且即使是更昂贵的对手也不是什么都做得更好,请看冷却系统。测试中的对比设备都比较昂贵,但它们在性能、显示效果,特别是冷却系统方面都没有什么优势。然而,你必须为USB-C或更长的电池运行时间付出更多。另外,我们建议看一下我们的 廉价游戏笔记本电脑排行榜.

价格和可用性

MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028 - 12/08/2021 v7 (old)
Christian Hintze

Chassis
70 / 98 → 71%
Keyboard
86%
Pointing Device
79%
Connectivity
58 / 80 → 72%
Weight
61 / 10-66 → 91%
Battery
54 / 95 → 57%
Display
87%
Games Performance
98%
Application Performance
96%
Temperature
82 / 95 → 86%
Noise
84 / 90 → 93%
Audio
82%
Camera
38 / 85 → 45%
Average
75%
85%
Gaming - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 廉价的MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH在审查中。具备RTX 3080的玩家,价格低于2000欧元
Christian Hintze, 2021-12-16 (Update: 2021-12-16)