Notebookcheck Logo

MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS游戏笔记本回顾。足够强大的QHD

阿尔德湖+安培的更新。

除了RTX 3080 Ti,Nvidia还将在2022年初推出RTX 3070 Ti。微星Stealth GS66 12UGS是我们被允许测试的第一台配备这种有前途的高端GPU的笔记本电脑。但是,在内置的240赫兹面板上,你到底能得到多少FPS?
Alder Lake Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook MSI
MSI Stealth GS66

目前在微星的德国网站上列出了最新一代GS66的三个型号。虽然评论中的GS66 12UGS和GS66 12UH都配备了 酷睿i7-12700H,32GB DDR5内存和QHD面板,而GS66 12UHS可以配置一个 酷睿i9-12900H,64GB内存和一个UHD显示屏。根据不同的版本,一个 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti,GeForce RTX 3080, 或GeForce RTX 3080 Ti作为显卡使用。所有模型的共同点是使用Windows 11 Pro作为操作系统。新款GS66的价格从3149欧元(约3580美元)开始--这是一个相当大的数字。顶级型号甚至会让你花费4899欧元(约合人民币5569元)。

MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS (GS66 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i7-12700H 14 x 1.7 - 4.7 GHz, 200 W PL2 / Short Burst, 200 W PL1 / Sustained, Alder Lake-H
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU - 8 GB VRAM, Core: 1035 MHz, RAM: 1500 MHz, 105 W TDP, GDDR6, ForceWare 511.65, Optimus
Memory
32 GB 
, 2x 16 GB SO-DIMM DDR5-4800, dual-channel, two slots (both in use), max. 64 GB
Display
15.60 inch 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixel 188 PPI, Sharp LQ156T1JW04 (SHP153C), IPS level, QHD, glossy: no, 240 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH
Storage
WDC PC SN810 1TB, 1024 GB 
, NVMe SSD, two M.2 slots (one in use), PCIe 4.0 x4
Soundcard
Intel Alder Point-M/P PCH - HD Audio
Connections
4 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 3 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 1 combo (mic/headset), 1 Fingerprint Reader
Networking
Killer 2.5 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 19.8 x 358 x 248
Battery
99.9 Wh, 6578 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 4 cells
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Pro
Camera
Webcam: HD (720p, 30 fps)
Additional features
Speakers: Dynaudio 2.0, Keyboard: SteelSeries chiclet RGB, Keyboard Light: yes, 240-watt power adapter, MSI Center, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
2.2 kg, Power Supply: 578 g
Price
3 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

GS66 12UGS的竞争对手包括配备 "经典 "的15英寸笔记本电脑。RTX 3070和类似的TGPs,如 华硕TUF A15 FA506QR,以及Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD,以及笔记本,以及Alienware x15 P111F,以及 Eurocom Nightsky ARX15.这些笔记本电脑作为对比设备出现在表格中。

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
84.5 %
v7 (old)
02 / 2022
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
2.2 kg19.8 mm15.60"2560x1440
Alternative specs USD 2,449.00
85 %
v7 (old)
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
2.3 kg24 mm15.60"1920x1080
from EUR 1700
85.6 %
v7 (old)
08 / 2021
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
2.2 kg20 mm15.60"3840x2160
87.2 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2021
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
2.4 kg15.9 mm15.60"2560x1440
Alternative specs USD 2,399.00
83 %
v7 (old)
01 / 2022
Eurocom Nightsky ARX315
R9 5900X, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
2.6 kg32.5 mm15.60"1920x1080
from EUR 2600

案例

乍一看,外壳与以下产品非常相似GS66 10UG在2021年回顾。然而,在细节方面,微星做了一些改变。例如,其中一个USB-A端口已被Type-C端口取代。此外,现在在触摸板的左上角有一个指纹传感器。

该机的总体结构及其优点和缺点保持不变。GS66最大的优势之一是其紧凑的设计。它的宽度为35.8厘米,深度为24.8厘米,是测试领域中占地面积最小的15英寸产品。在高度方面,Stealth仅被Alienware x15击败(19.8毫米)。在重量方面,情况也同样不错。 2.2公斤,与技嘉Aero 15相同,按游戏标准来说是令人愉快的轻量,而且易于运输。

MSI Stealth GS66
MSI Stealth GS66
MSI Stealth GS66
MSI Stealth GS66
MSI Stealth GS66
MSI Stealth GS66
MSI Stealth GS66
MSI Stealth GS66
MSI Stealth GS66
MSI Stealth GS66

在外观方面,除了五颜六色的键盘照明,机箱相当平淡无奇,这可能会得到一些买家的青睐。由于使用了金属,哑光的黑色表面看起来很有品质。做工也不错,尽管底座和底盖之间的过渡可以更精致一些。

对于这样一个低调的机箱来说,稳定性还不错。键盘和触摸板有一点弯曲,盖子可以使用更多的抗扭性。铰链的工作还算合格。180°的宽广开启角度尤其值得称赞。

尺寸比较

361 mm 258 mm 32.5 mm 2.6 kg360 mm 256 mm 24 mm 2.3 kg358 mm 248 mm 19.8 mm 2.2 kg356 mm 250 mm 20 mm 2.2 kg359.7 mm 277.25 mm 15.9 mm 2.4 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

连接性

端口

如果你忽略了读卡器的缺失,连接性就会变得非常好。尽管机身高度较低,但机身上有一个完整的RJ45端口。此外,还有一个音频插孔,一个现代的HDMI 2.1端口(4K @120Hz),以及总共五个USB端口,其中三个是Type-C格式,支持DisplayPort功能。微星甚至为其中一个Type-C端口使用了Thunderbolt 4。

接口的分布有点让人失望。由于两侧的后部区域被风扇出口占据,端口位于相当远的前方,这可能会导致碰撞和使用外部鼠标时的空间限制,这取决于涉及的电缆数量。

左侧。能源供应,Thunderbolt 4,HDMI 2.1,USB-A 3.2 Gen 2
左侧。能源供应,Thunderbolt 4,HDMI 2.1,USB-A 3.2 Gen 2
右侧。音频插孔,2个USB-C 3.2 Gen 2,包括DisplayPort,USB-A 3.2 Gen 2,RJ45网络。
右侧。音频插孔,2个USB-C 3.2 Gen 2,包括DisplayPort,USB-A 3.2 Gen 2,RJ45网络。

沟通

在我们最近更新了路由器设置后(现在使用的是华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000),获得的结果不能与旧的测试进行1:1的比较,这就是为什么竞争对手的数值不见了。内置在GS66中的Killer 6E AX1675i芯片同样提供了非常好的性能。有线网络连接支持高达2.5千兆(Killer E3100G)。

Networking - iperf3 receive AXE11000
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1569 (622min - 1690max) MBit/s
Average of class Gaming
  (680 - 1744, n=122, last 2 years)
1400 MBit/s -11%
05010015020025030035040045050055060065070075080085090095010001050110011501200125013001350140014501500155016001650Tooltip
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1541 (622-1690)

网络摄像头

与几乎所有的游戏笔记本电脑一样,网络摄像头的质量非常低。除了颜色的准确性,图像的清晰度也很欠缺--这在我们的照片中可以看到。

ColorChecker
13.8 ∆E
15.9 ∆E
18.7 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
18.5 ∆E
17.1 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
24.2 ∆E
16.5 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
15.9 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
16 ∆E
17 ∆E
17.4 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
16.8 ∆E
21.5 ∆E
1.8 ∆E
13 ∆E
17.9 ∆E
16 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
ColorChecker MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS: 15.17 ∆E min: 1.76 - max: 24.18 ∆E

辅料

盒子里有一个240瓦的电源适配器,重量不到600克,还有几本信息手册。

维护

为了进入内部,必须从机箱底部卸下总共9颗十字头螺钉(其中一颗位于工厂密封条下方)。在这之后,可以用一个扁平的工具将底盖从其锚定处撬出,这需要力量和灵活性。在引擎盖下可以找到巨大的电池、两个M.2插槽和两个由盖子保护的内存插槽。冷却系统由三个风扇和几个热管组成。

MSI Stealth GS66
MSI Stealth GS66
MSI Stealth GS66
MSI Stealth GS66
MSI Stealth GS66
MSI Stealth GS66

担保

微星为产品提供两年的保修(取货和退货服务)。

输入设备

键盘

这款键盘主要是为游戏玩家的需求而定制的。广泛和可定制的RGB灯光,在极端情况下可以将GS66变成一个迪斯科舞厅(见照片),作为一个积极的特点应该特别提到。

布局在测试中并不尽如人意。从单行回车键开始,这对德国键盘来说是相当不寻常的。>>| 键和'#'键的位置也偏离了标准。伴随而来的是一些尴尬的组合(F12/打印屏幕,删除/插入)和其他一些有问题的设计选择。例如,Fn和右Ctrl键被严重地挤压在一起。至少方向键是令人愉快的大。我们将打字的体验描述为可以接受。它不是特别清晰,而是趋向于感觉粘稠(关键词:旅行)。

RGB键盘
RGB键盘

触摸板

虽然触摸板6.5厘米的高度并不令人感到兴奋,但其14厘米的宽度却令人印象深刻。光滑的表面提供了良好的滑行性能。在精确度和手势支持方面,也几乎没有什么可抱怨的。然而,微星仍然需要在其稳定性上下功夫。特别是在左边和右边的边缘,触控板可以很明显地被压入机箱,导致感知质量下降。

显示

正如一开始提到的,制造商为显示器使用了快速的240赫兹面板,这也为其刷新率提供了保障。在我们的测试中测得的响应时间都在10毫秒以下,这在笔记本电脑领域是值得尊重的事情。

253
cd/m²
255
cd/m²
249
cd/m²
264
cd/m²
272
cd/m²
259
cd/m²
236
cd/m²
248
cd/m²
245
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
Sharp LQ156T1JW04 (SHP153C) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 272 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 253.4 cd/m² Minimum: 5 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 272 cd/m²
Contrast: 1088:1 (Black: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.73 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.86, calibrated: 0.98
ΔE Greyscale 6.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
85.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
96.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.172
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Sharp LQ156T1JW04 (SHP153C), IPS-Level, 2560x1440, 15.6"
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
Sharp SHP1532, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
Samsung SDC4143, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.6"
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F
LG Philips 156QHG, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.6"
Eurocom Nightsky ARX315
Sharp LQ156M1JW03, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Display
7%
1%
-15%
Display P3 Coverage
96.4
99.9
4%
97.8
1%
67.9
-30%
sRGB Coverage
99.7
100
0%
99.9
0%
99.7
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
85.6
99.5
16%
73.7
-14%
Response Times
-48%
65%
-62%
-93%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
6 ?(3.2, 2.8)
12 ?(6, 6)
-100%
2.8 ?(1.6, 1.2)
53%
12 ?(6, 6)
-100%
15.2 ?(7.6, 7.6)
-153%
Response Time Black / White *
8.4 ?(4.4, 4)
8 ?(4, 4)
5%
2 ?(1, 1)
76%
10.4 ?(6, 4.4)
-24%
11.2 ?(6, 5.2)
-33%
PWM Frequency
1250 ?(20)
240 ?(83)
23150 ?(34)
Screen
30%
123%
8%
14%
Brightness middle
272
297
9%
440
62%
409.5
51%
312.8
15%
Brightness
253
268
6%
446
76%
390
54%
294
16%
Brightness Distribution
87
84
-3%
92
6%
88
1%
90
3%
Black Level *
0.25
0.22
12%
0.04
84%
0.47
-88%
0.28
-12%
Contrast
1088
1350
24%
11000
911%
871
-20%
1117
3%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.73
1.36
64%
2.53
32%
3.48
7%
2.96
21%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
9.43
3.82
59%
7.82
17%
6.31
33%
6.23
34%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
0.98
2.57
-162%
0.89
9%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
6.5
1.88
71%
1.2
82%
5
23%
4.2
35%
Gamma
2.172 101%
2.48 89%
2.206 100%
2.16 102%
2.32 95%
CCT
6485 100%
6768 96%
6371 102%
6591 99%
7145 91%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
63
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-9% / 15%
65% / 90%
-18% / -4%
-31% / -9%

* ... smaller is better

另一个亮点是丰富的色彩空间。尽管我们不能完全测量微星指定的100%的DCI-P3覆盖率(尽管在真彩软件中选择了相应的配置文件),但96%的P3覆盖率仍然很出色,让大多数游戏笔记本望尘莫及。从对比领域来看,只有技嘉Aero 15和Alienware x15的面板能够跟上。

卡尔曼:灰鳞
卡尔曼:灰鳞
卡尔曼:色彩饱和度
卡尔曼:色彩饱和度
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: 灰度表(已校准)
CalMAN: 灰度表(已校准)
CalMAN:色彩饱和度(已校准)。
CalMAN:色彩饱和度(已校准)。
CalMAN: ColorChecker (已校准)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (已校准)

GS66 12UGS的其余测量结果给我们留下了复杂的感觉。虽然对比度(超过1,000:1)和黑度(0.25cd/m²)令人信服,但色彩准确度和亮度与预期或可行的情况有一定差距。

隐形GS66 12UGS与sRGB对比
隐形GS66 12UGS与sRGB对比
Stealth GS66 12UGS vs. P3
Stealth GS66 12UGS vs. P3
隐形GS66 12UGS与AdobeRGB的对比
隐形GS66 12UGS与AdobeRGB的对比

253cd/m²的平均亮度使Stealth不适合在户外使用。为此,至少需要300,或者更好的是350cd/m²。

眩光
眩光
子像素网格
子像素网格
视角
视角

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
8.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4.4 ms rise
↘ 4 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3.2 ms rise
↘ 2.8 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 16 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.5 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8485 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

业绩

即使是GS66的入门级版本也属于高端范围。32GB的内存应该足够未来几年使用,还有一个拥有14个内核的CPU。1000GB的固态硬盘容量也不差,尤其是在需要时可以用第二个M.2驱动器来扩展存储空间。在不久的将来,VRAM是唯一可能变得有限的领域,我们稍后会解释。

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
 

测试条件

用户可以在预装的MSI中心调整各种系统设置。除了3D和游戏测试是在禁用图形切换和极端性能模式下进行的,所有的测量都是在启用Optimus技术(常规设置菜单)的情况下使用智能自动模式(用户场景菜单)进行的。

MSI中心
MSI中心
MSI中心

处理器

芯片酷睿i7-12700H是一个基于英特尔Alder Lake架构的全新型号,时钟频率为1.7至4.7 GHz。这款10纳米的芯片容纳了六个支持超线程的性能核心,以及八个没有HT的效率核心。这使得这个45瓦的CPU能够并行处理多达20个线程。

为了最大限度地利用该处理器,微星使用了非常高的TDP设置。根据WiNFO工具,我们看到PL1和PL2的功率都是200瓦。虽然在实践中数值较低,但i7-12700H很容易超过其旧的Tiger Lake 的兄弟姐妹。例如,在Cinebench R15多线程测试中,这意味着与Core i7-11800H相比,增加了30%至50%。酷睿i7-11800H竞争者。AMD竞争者的形式是Ryzen 7 5800HRyzen 9 5900HX也必须承认失败,尽管每瓦性能比更有利于AMD,正如以前的测试一样。 测试已经显示。

Cinebench R15 multi endurance test

01452904355807258701015116013051450159517401885203021752320246526102755Tooltip
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2624 (2577.65-2843.74)
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T AMD Ryzen 7 5800H: Ø1903 (1786.91-2018.67)
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø1746 (1719.69-1885.99)
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø2144 (2104.27-2154.01)
Eurocom Nightsky ARX315 AMD Ryzen 9 5900X: Ø2239 (2223.83-2252.38)
CPU Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming
 
83.5 pt
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
74.8 pt
Eurocom Nightsky ARX315
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
64.9 pt
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F -2!
Intel Core i7-11800H
56.7 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T -2!
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
53.1 pt
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
Intel Core i7-11800H
50.4 pt

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit
23019 Points
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
19988
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 32Bit
147.8 fps
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
170.5 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2844 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
260 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
207 fps
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
693 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
6651 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
17940 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
1803 Points
Help
Performance Rating
Average of class Gaming
 
94.7 pt
Eurocom Nightsky ARX315
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
76.6 pt
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
61.6 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
58.5 pt
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD -9!
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
0 pt
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F -9!
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
0 pt

系统性能

在系统性能方面,微星GS66也夺得了第一名,尽管这里的差异要小得多。从主观上看,操作系统的反应和你对现代游戏笔记本的期望一样流畅和迅速。

PCMark 10 / Score
Average of class Gaming
  (5776 - 9852, n=132, last 2 years)
7866 Points +4%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
7582 Points
Eurocom Nightsky ARX315
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R9 5900X, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
7294 Points -4%
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
7217 Points -5%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7062 Points -7%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
6917 Points -9%
PCMark 10 Score
7582 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Average of class Gaming
  (21750 - 97515, n=149, last 2 years)
66395 MB/s +7%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
61994 MB/s
Eurocom Nightsky ARX315
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
41078 MB/s -34%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
39623 MB/s -36%

* ... smaller is better

DPC延迟

在延迟方面,GS66的表现并不理想。根据LatencyMon工具,微星笔记本电脑这一次在列表中排名靠后。你将不得不为某些应用场景做一些调整。

延迟监测
延迟监测
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Average of class Gaming
  (317 - 18227, n=119, last 2 years)
2403 μs * -11%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
2156 μs *
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
1541 μs * +29%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
999 μs * +54%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
823 μs * +62%
Eurocom Nightsky ARX315
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R9 5900X, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
371.6 μs * +83%

* ... smaller is better

储存

我们对这个存储设备没有什么可批评的。由于采用了PCIe 4.0,WDC的1TB固态硬盘(PC SN810)在我们的测试设备中表现出色,只有技嘉Aero 15中的三星硬盘可以与之媲美。在AS SSD基准测试中,连续速率达到了约5000MB/s,这是一个非常好的结果。

WDC PC SN810 1TB
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 6937 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 5156 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 1113 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 884 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 3979 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 5141 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 91.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 330.8 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS -8!
WDC PC SN810 1TB
87.2 pt
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
83.5 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
77.1 pt
Eurocom Nightsky ARX315
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
64.9 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
61.1 pt
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
40.9 pt

* ... smaller is better

Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

No graph data

图形卡

随着 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti,Nvidia推出了一个更强大的版本的 RTX 3070.该GPU现在提供5,888个着色器,而不是5,120个着色器单元,这相当于增加了15%。此外,张量核心(184对160)和光线追踪核心(46对40)的数量也有所增加。然而,Nvidia当前一代安培的性能不仅取决于基本规格,而且在很大程度上取决于冷却系统和预定义的TGP。与RTX 3070类似,RTX 3070 Ti的TGP从80瓦到125瓦不等(无动态提升)。微星在GS66上选择了一个相当低的数值:包括动态提升,它 "只有 "105瓦特。因此,RTX 3070 Ti的潜力没有得到充分的利用。

这在基准测试过程中也是可见的。尽管在着色器等方面有更好的配置,但GS66的性能评级与Eurocom Nightsky ARX15和Alienware x15大致持平,这两款产品的RTX 3070的TGP分别为115瓦和110瓦。只有在Port Royal光线追踪测试中,GS66才接近榜首。非常恼人的是,Nvidia在刷新GPU时没有增加视频内存。即使在今天,8GB的GDDR6 VRAM在更高的分辨率和细节水平下也会不时达到极限。考虑到价格和高端要求,在2022年至少需要10GB的VRAM(更像是12GB)。毕竟,在RTX 3080 Ti直接提供了16GB的GDDR6内存--这里的VRAM配置是足够的。

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming
 
100 pt
Eurocom Nightsky ARX315
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
76.1 pt
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
75.4 pt
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
74.1 pt
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
69.2 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
67.2 pt
3DMark 06 Standard Score
54178 points
3DMark Vantage P Result
81895 points
3DMark 11 Performance
29249 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
58095 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
22334 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
10079 points
Help

游戏性能

在游戏时,"Ti "标识符也不太符合其名称。如果你把所有40个测试的游戏放在一起,GS66的RTX 3070 Ti由于其微薄的TGP,很难将自己与其他RTX 3070笔记本GPU区分开。稍微快一点的Eurocom Nightsky ARX15非常清楚地表明,较高的TGP可以补偿较低的着色器数量。

总的来说,GeForce RTX 3070 Ti的速度足以在2560x1440的原生分辨率下流畅地运行要求较高的游戏,并在高到最大的细节方面。除了 赛博朋克2077画面中,Ultra预设和QHD的组合总是导致最低40FPS--大多数时候甚至超过60FPS。只有在4K时,RTX 3070 Ti才会更频繁地达到其极限。

Performance Rating - Percent
Eurocom Nightsky ARX315 -193!
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R9 5900X
95.9 pt
Average of class Gaming -95!
 
93.7 pt
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS -34!
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H
93.3 pt
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F -189!
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
83.8 pt
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD -160!
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
78.7 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T -194!
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
73.7 pt

我们测试了图形性能在较长一段时间内的表现,其中包括的情况。Witcher 3约60分钟。虽然没有出现严重的FPS下降,但基本性能和时钟速率在一段时间后会有一定程度的下降,就像在Cinebench循环中一样。

The Witcher 3 FPS diagram

0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø81.3 (77-86)
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
GTA V (2015) 181 170 105
The Witcher 3 (2015) 271 166 90.4
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 181 166 158 151
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 117 87
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 128 117 91.6
Far Cry 5 (2018) 139 131 118
Strange Brigade (2018) 216 175 153
Hunt Showdown (2020) 139 116 75.1 36.5
Doom Eternal (2020) 222 196 188 145 78.2
Gears Tactics (2020) 204 135 102 75.2 40.1
Death Stranding (2020) 139 132 129 94.4 55.2
Crysis Remastered (2020) 178 71.8 64.3 48.5 27.6
Serious Sam 4 (2020) 110 99.2 82.4 64.2 40.5
Mafia Definitive Edition (2020) 103 95.1 66.1 35.7
Star Wars Squadrons (2020) 292 269 237 167 92.9
Watch Dogs Legion (2020) 107 97 65 50 29
Dirt 5 (2020) 124 98.4 78.5 64 41.6
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla (2020) 102 85 73 56 35
Yakuza Like a Dragon (2020) 117 113 100 68.5 37
Cyberpunk 2077 1.0 (2020) 82.1 66.9 56.1 35.9 17.5
Hitman 3 (2021) 169 146 138 95.8 54.3
Outriders (2021) 143 124 104 70 37.4
Resident Evil Village (2021) 176 160 141 98.1 52.9
Mass Effect Legendary Edition (2021) 147 128 80.5
Days Gone (2021) 130 115 86.3 64.1 36.9
F1 2021 (2021) 268 201 108 80 47
Deathloop (2021) 117 98.1 80.2 56.1 30.8
New World (2021) 107 94.3 83.3 58.3 32.2
Alan Wake Remastered (2021) 154 146 104 56.7
Far Cry 6 (2021) 125 108 95 70 38
Back 4 Blood (2021) 221 189 176 120 63.9
Guardians of the Galaxy (2021) 126 125 120 87 49
Riders Republic (2021) 127 104 96 70 39
Forza Horizon 5 (2021) 136 122 76 65 47
Battlefield 2042 (2021) 115 96.7 85.6 63.2 39.5
Farming Simulator 22 (2021) 196 170 144 112 69.7
Halo Infinite (2021) 120 101 95.5 65.5 34.6
God of War (2022) 91.3 76.6 55.1 45.2 31.5
Rainbow Six Extraction (2022) 181 176 138 91 46
Dying Light 2 (2022) 78.4 69.6 51.3 28.3

排放

噪声排放

GS66 12UGS在使用自动AI配置文件时,既不安静也不特别响亮。在空闲使用时,风扇始终处于活动状态,并以温和的31至32 dB(A)的速度旋转(偶尔会达到35 dB)。在负载情况下,噪音水平明显增加到43至48 dB(A),尽管与许多竞争对手相比,从未超过50 dB(A)的标准。尽管如此,对噪音敏感的用户在游戏时将不得不使用耳机。

Noise Level

Idle
31 / 32 / 35 dB(A)
Load
48 / 48 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 24 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs204554.746.739.644.22540.742.239.333.241.43152.449.447.441.645.54035.335.833.429.135.55040.44040.839.443.26337.233.235.927.6358039.92224.120.741.510026.422.72317.331.812528.722.222.217.534.316026.328.636.819.531.320030.531.726.12335.625029.223.123.220.131.931532.122.320.514.134.240028.525.117.911.129.7500302017.710.632.163031.122.218.410.734.180031.621.618.811.234100034.12319.210.934.9125035.423.72010.835.8160036.924.120.310.936.9200037.223.419.110.936.8250036.321.618.711.335.5315037.122.818.911.836.7400038.923.320.612.338.2500039.824.221.312.238.8630034.820.217.112.634.1800035.716.814.412.534.91000032.314.313.712.431.81250027.613.713.41226.61600021.312.912.811.619.9SPL48.234.83224.448N6.32.31.70.66.5median 32.1median 22.7median 19.1median 12median 34.2Delta3.71.82.22.12.5hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseMSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
Eurocom Nightsky ARX315
R9 5900X, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
Average of class Gaming
 
Noise
8%
-5%
9%
-8%
8%
off / environment *
24
26
-8%
25
-4%
24.1
-0%
25.3
-5%
Idle Minimum *
31
26
16%
30
3%
26.6
14%
25.9
16%
Idle Average *
32
26
19%
32
-0%
26.6
17%
27.9
13%
Idle Maximum *
35
27.4
22%
35
-0%
26.6
24%
40.8
-17%
Load Average *
48
46.6
3%
44
8%
30.9
36%
55.2
-15%
Witcher 3 ultra *
43
51
-19%
49.9
-16%
52.4
-22%
Load Maximum *
48
49.3
-3%
60
-25%
53.5
-11%
60.3
-26%

* ... smaller is better

温度

GS66不得不接受一些关于其热量发展的批评。在使用FurMark和Prime95工具进行的压力测试中,机箱的后部区域分别加热到54℃(约129°F)(顶部)和59℃(约138°F)。因此,将设备放在腿上的游戏环节并不是一个好主意。当笔记本电脑闲置时,情况要轻松得多:表面保持在30°C(约86°F)以下。冷却系统的能力相当有限,这一事实在查看组件时变得很清楚。在我们的TheWitcher 3 测试中,GPU和CPU的温度分别达到了80°C(约176°F)和90°C(约194°F)。

ǞǞǞWitcher 3
ǞǞǞWitcher 3
ǞǞǞWitcher 3
ǞǞǞWitcher 3
ǞǞǞWitcher 3
ǞǞǞWitcher 3
压力测试
压力测试
压力测试
压力测试
压力测试
压力测试
Max. Load
 51 °C46 °C54 °C 
 47 °C46 °C39 °C 
 38 °C38 °C33 °C 
Maximum: 54 °C
Average: 43.6 °C
54 °C59 °C52 °C
46 °C56 °C53 °C
39 °C41 °C39 °C
Maximum: 59 °C
Average: 48.8 °C
Power Supply (max.)  52 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 43.6 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 54 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 59 °C / 138 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.1 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 45.1 °C / 113 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 38 °C / 100.4 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-9.1 °C / -16.4 F).
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
Eurocom Nightsky ARX315
R9 5900X, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
Average of class Gaming
 
Heat
-16%
-10%
-6%
-9%
-3%
Maximum Upper Side *
54
46.7
14%
45
17%
59.2
-10%
36.2
33%
Maximum Bottom *
59
55.9
5%
54
8%
58
2%
49.6
16%
Idle Upper Side *
26
37.1
-43%
34
-31%
28.4
-9%
32.6
-25%
Idle Bottom *
27
38.1
-41%
36
-33%
29
-7%
43.2
-60%

* ... smaller is better

发言人

新的Stealth GS66的声音质量一般。作为笔记本电脑的典型,低音特别缺乏。根据我们的音频分析,中音和高音播放得相当清晰。最大的优点是最大音量为86dB(A),很充裕。作为比较。Gigabyte Aero 15只能达到75 dB(A)。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.647.22533.238.83141.646.14029.134.65039.441.26327.638.18020.729.510017.330.612517.542.716019.551.42002354.525020.164.131514.161.640011.159.550010.669.663010.773.780011.276.5100010.977.6125010.877.3160010.977.2200010.975.5250011.373.2315011.871400012.374.9500012.275.5630012.671.1800012.5691000012.463.1125001256.41600011.650.6SPL24.486.5N0.668.4median 12median 69.6Delta2.19.544.833.840.933.149.640.235.535.227.526.727.531.921.227.721.922.822.327.418.632.121.541.718.352.514.753.312.954.81259.91265.311.866.311.766.611.765.311.754.111.956.912.354.21360.513.661.613.66413.567.113.560.213.156.312.559.712.259.425.274.80.735.1median 13median 59.426.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMSI Stealth GS66 12UGSGigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 68% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

能源管理

当图形切换被激活时(GPU切换:MSHybrid @MSI中心),GS66在空闲模式下是相当节俭的。11至23瓦特提供了坚实的电池运行时间。在负载情况下,能耗攀升至110至230瓦--考虑到你得到的性能,这是可以接受的。

能源消耗

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.1 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 11 / 16 / 23 Watt
Load midlight 110 / 230 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
Eurocom Nightsky ARX315
R9 5900X, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
12%
-34%
-22%
-174%
-12%
Idle Minimum *
11
10.2
7%
23
-109%
15.7
-43%
55
-400%
Idle Average *
16
12.8
20%
26
-63%
20.3
-27%
68.2
-326%
Idle Maximum *
23
15
35%
34
-48%
43
-87%
72.5
-215%
Load Average *
110
130
-18%
99
10%
94.4
14%
149.2
-36%
Witcher 3 ultra *
151
137
9%
163
-8%
167
-11%
233
-54%
Load Maximum *
230
184
20%
190
17%
183.4
20%
255.8
-11%

* ... smaller is better

Energy consumption during The Witcher 3 / stress test

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170Tooltip
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø150.5 (145-169)
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø163.9 (156-176)

Energy consumption with an external monitor

0102030405060708090100110120130140Tooltip
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø99.9 (88-120)
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø89.3 (88.8-90)
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø132.6 (129-138)
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø136.8 (132-146)

电池寿命

微星为GS66配备了一个巨大的99Wh的电池,尽管其容量充足,但它并没有真正发挥其作用。即使在完美的条件下(最低亮度,最大省电,无负载),这台15英寸的机器甚至不能达到8小时。Alienware x15以较低的电池容量实现了超过9小时,而华硕TUF A15甚至超过17小时。在我们的实际Wi-Fi测试中,在中等亮度下,我们能够从微星笔记本电脑中获得大约5:30小时的时间,这是一个可行的结果。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
7h 47min
WiFi Websurfing
5h 24min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 36min
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 99 Wh
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 87 Wh
Eurocom Nightsky ARX315
R9 5900X, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 62 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
95%
57%
-2%
-81%
11%
Reader / Idle
467
1043
123%
582
25%
WiFi v1.3
324
685
111%
508
57%
366
13%
61
-81%
Load
96
145
51%
53
-45%
Witcher 3 ultra
131

Pros

+ 240赫兹面板,色彩空间覆盖面大
+ 紧凑轻便的外壳
+ 雷电4
+ 99Wh的电池

Cons

- 对于高端GPU来说,8GB的VRAM已经不能满足需要了
- 负载下的高热开发
- 糟糕的网络摄像头

判决书

MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS。评测设备由德国微星公司提供
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS。评测设备由德国微星公司提供

随着新一代GS66的推出,微星不仅更新了处理器,还更新了显卡。

在我们测试的12UGS型号中发现的酷睿i7-12700H和GeForce RTX 3070 Ti在原生QHD分辨率(2560x1440像素)下流畅地运行所有现代游戏。

15英寸显示屏的刷新率为240赫兹,速度非常快,而且在此基础上还提供了很好的色彩空间(几乎100%的DCI-P3),这应该会让游戏玩家以及内容创作者满意,尽管我们仍然希望能有更高的亮度。

外壳、输入设备和连接性(Thunderbolt 4)都处于良好水平。然而,在其他方面,GS66由于在3D模式下的高温发展和其糟糕的网络摄像头而失去了分数--大多数笔记本电脑都是这样的。

总的来说,Stealth GS66 12UGS获得了85%的分数,这使它与 华硕TUF A15 FA506QR.其他RTX 3070的竞争对手要么稍微落后(Eurocom Nightsky ARX15)或略微领先(Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XDAlienware x15 P111F).

价格和可用性

在写这篇文章的时候,微星Stealth GS66 12UGS在美国似乎没有与我们相同的测试配置。尽管如此,你可以关注一下商店,如Best Buy亚马逊,并等待它在那里上市或找到类似的配置。

MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS - 02/16/2022 v7 (old)
Florian Glaser

Chassis
78 / 98 → 80%
Keyboard
77%
Pointing Device
83%
Connectivity
64 / 80 → 80%
Weight
62 / 10-66 → 92%
Battery
66 / 95 → 69%
Display
84%
Games Performance
97%
Application Performance
98%
Temperature
74 / 95 → 78%
Noise
70 / 90 → 77%
Audio
78%
Camera
42 / 85 → 49%
Average
75%
85%
Gaming - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS游戏笔记本回顾。足够强大的QHD
Florian Glaser, 2022-02-20 (Update: 2024-11- 4)