华为Mate Xs 2评测--可折叠的残障智能手机
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 84.1 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2022 | Huawei Mate Xs 2 SD 888 4G, Adreno 660 | 255 g | 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 7.80" | 2480x2220 | |
| 88.9 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2021 | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G SD 888 5G, Adreno 660 | 271 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 7.60" | 2208x1768 | |
| 82.6 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2020 | Huawei Mate Xs Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16 | 300 g | 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash | 8.00" | 2480x2200 | |
| 86.9 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2022 | Vivo X Fold SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730 | 311 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 8.03" | 2160x1916 |
外壳和功能 - Mate Xs 2的铰链得到改进
华为的Mate Xs 2已经变得略小，最重要的是，比上一代产品要轻得多。然而，它实际上有点厚（0.1毫米），但仍然比竞争对手薄，特别是由于大部分可折叠在展开时只有5.4毫米的纤细高度。
华为坚持其将整个面板移到外面的概念，由于由此产生的曲线，手感舒适，但显示屏的保护程度也不如内嵌式变体。即使应用的保护膜也不是很让人放心。制造质量有了明显的改善，特别是铰链现在给人的印象比前代产品要稳定得多，但当显示屏没有完全打开时，它有时会轻微弯曲。锁定机制在日常使用中非常可靠，仍然可以通过手指触摸轻松打开。总而言之，我们喜欢它的制造质量和材料印象，只有塑料背面不太适合这幅画面。
设备几乎没有变化，只有SoC的变化也意味着5G的损失，因为 Mate Xs仍然配备了 麒麟990 5G由于贸易限制，这已经不可能了。
| SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Huawei Mate Xs 2 (Huawei NanoMemory) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (7.7 - 77, n=81, last 2 years) | |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
通信、软件和操作--华为智能手机不再是5G了
由于已经提到的原因，华为Mate Xs 2最多只能用LTE接入移动数据网络。频段覆盖很好，但考虑到价格范围，应该更广泛。所有频段在欧洲都可以使用，但在洲际覆盖方面有一两个缺口。
支持VHT160的Wi-Fi 6可用于WLAN连接。虽然缺少6GHz网络，但华为仍然承诺高数据速率，不幸的是，这在与我们的参考路由器华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000的测试中没有得到证实。希望华为能在未来的更新中改善这一点。
华为Mate Xs2的电话功能是令人信服的。当握在耳边时，用户的声音传达得非常自然，噪音抑制也很好。扬声器模式会有一点回响，但也能很好地使用。可以使用VoLTE和WLAN通话等功能。
开源的Android 11与EMUI 12作为操作系统被安装，这相当于欧洲的Harmony OS 2.0。这里仍然找不到谷歌服务或Play Store。相反，AppGallery是可用的。如果缺少一个应用程序，Petal Search可以在网上搜索并通过第三方网站安装。智能手机随后会对其进行检查，但仍然存在恶意软件的残余风险，华为可能也意识到了这一点，因为在安装前会显示厚厚的免责声明。这一切都运行得相当好，但发展缓慢。即将推出的Harmony OS 3.0和EMUI 13相当晚，华为不能或不想告诉我们它们是基于哪个Android 。交叉安装的应用程序也不总是顺利运行。一个很好的例子是微软的OneDrive，它在德国必须通过Petal Search安装，因为AppGallery中的版本在这里没有发布。起初，它可以正常工作，但最近在HMS核心更新后，它不再启动。这引起了挫折感，尤其是简单的重新安装往往是不够的，但必须先费力地手动删除该应用程序的其余部分。此外，Mate Xs 2在测试中不想连接到Windows PC进行数据交换。USB连接已经建立，但没有显示可以访问的驱动器。甚至在一个 笔记本13也只能通过华为共享进行数据交换；我们在有线连接时也面临同样的问题。
指纹传感器位于智能手机的电源按钮中，确保快速和可靠的解锁。此外，也可以通过前置摄像头进行不太安全的认证。
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G | |
| Huawei Mate Xs | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Huawei Mate Xs | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| Vivo X Fold | |
| Huawei Mate Xs 2 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Vivo X Fold | |
| Huawei Mate Xs 2 | |
照相机--华为可折叠相机中伟大的三合一相机
华为Mate Xs 2的前置摄像头最多只能满足视频通话的低要求。用它来拍自拍并不有趣。但它们不必如此，因为具有全方位选择的主摄像头在折叠时只需在背面显示一个数字取景器，也可用于自拍。
主摄像头依靠的是5000万像素的真彩传感器，即使在低光下也能拍出非常好的照片。超广角镜头也很有说服力。只是遗憾的是，华为没有再使用高分辨率的传感器，这在景深和细节方面是很明显的。三倍光学变焦（最大30倍数字变焦）也提供了良好的效果，但数字变焦只是一般。视频最多只能以60FPS的超高清记录。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cmeraMain cameraUltra wide-angle5-x ZoomLow-Light
显示屏 - 可折叠OLED，120赫兹
华为Mate Xs 2的OLED面板在展开时的显示对角线为7.8英寸（19.8厘米，2480 x 2,200像素）。折叠时，背面被禁用，6.5英寸（16.5厘米，2,480 x 1,176像素）显示屏仍然可见。华为已经大大改善了亮度，现在达到了769cd/m²的平均亮度，采用纯白显示和激活环境光传感器。当黑暗和明亮区域均匀分布时（APL18），它几乎没有变得更亮（780 cd/m²）。如果你手动调整亮度，你有536 cd/m²可供支配。支持HLG、HDR10以及HDR10+等HDR标准，还可以获得DRM认证。
该面板支持高达120Hz的刷新率。可以在设置中选择这个或60赫兹的固定值。在自动模式下，系统自动在60、90和120赫兹之间切换。
华为依靠1,440赫兹的高频直流调光模式，这应该对眼睛特别容易。在用示波器测量时，我们只能确定帧率的水平上的闪烁。我们无法检测到时间上的抖动，但我们用显微镜和240 FPS的慢动作视频（深灰色，全亮度）观察显示屏。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 763 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 4.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.24
| Huawei Mate Xs 2 OLED, 2480x2220, 7.8" | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G Dynamic AMOLED, 2208x1768, 7.6" | Huawei Mate Xs OLED, 2480x2200, 8" | Vivo X Fold AMOLED, 2160x1916, 8" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response Times | -287% | -153% | -12% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 1.09 ? | 10.4 ? -854% | 5.2 ? -377% | 1.8 -65% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 1.13 ? | 2.4 ? -112% | 3.2 ? -183% | 0.8 29% |
| PWM Frequency | 120.2 | 245.1 ? 104% | 242.7 ? 102% | 120 0% |
| Screen | 14% | -10% | 24% | |
| Brightness middle | 763 | 808 6% | 417 -45% | 730 -4% |
| Brightness | 769 | 820 7% | 418 -46% | 724 -6% |
| Brightness Distribution | 95 | 97 2% | 99 4% | 95 0% |
| Black Level * | ||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.8 | 2.9 -4% | 2.6 7% | 1.66 41% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.9 | 4.2 29% | 7.7 -31% | 2.92 51% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.3 | 2.5 42% | 2 53% | 1.6 63% |
| Gamma | 2.24 98% | 2.01 109% | 2.31 95% | 2.28 96% |
| CCT | 6457 101% | 6359 102% | 6276 104% | 6395 102% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -137% /
-87% | -82% /
-57% | 6% /
12% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1.13 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.5595 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.5735 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 1.09 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.515 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.573 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 120.2 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 120.2 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 120.2 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
具有固定变焦水平和不同亮度设置的测量系列
性能、排放和电池寿命
华为Mate Xs 2搭载的是 骁龙888 4G8GB工作内存，确保系统性能平稳，即使是在多任务处理期间。在基准测试中，该SoC的性能达到了预期水平。当启用性能模式时，在GPU密集型任务中也能获得一些额外的动力，但这明显会对电池产生影响。
华为可折叠手机的表面温度从未让人感到不舒服。即使在持续的负载下，它也只是在一些地方会有温暖的触感。然而，这并不适用于SoC，它在很短的时间内就已经明显地节流了，而且几乎没有比，例如，Z Fold3的长期性能更好。 Galaxy Z Fold3这就是为什么它可以被安全地停用。
Mate Xs 2的两个扬声器真的很好，即使在最大音量下仍能提供相对较好的播放质量。USB-C可用于有线外部声音输出，而蓝牙5.2可用于无线。然而，后者只能使用数量相当有限的音频编解码器（SBC、AAC、LDAC）。
尽管有4600毫安时的电池，华为智能手机的运行时间相当弱。Mate Xs 2的密集使用时间甚至不到8小时，就无法度过一天。然而，华为包括一个66瓦的电源适配器，可以在30分钟内将电池充电到90%。
| GFXBench | |
| on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate Xs 2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G | |
| Huawei Mate Xs | |
| Vivo X Fold | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G (30 - 44, n=3) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 166, n=207, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate Xs 2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G | |
| Huawei Mate Xs | |
| Vivo X Fold | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G (50 - 72, n=3) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 321, n=207, last 2 years) | |
| on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate Xs 2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G | |
| Huawei Mate Xs | |
| Vivo X Fold | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G (20 - 31, n=3) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 144, n=207, last 2 years) | |
| 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate Xs 2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G | |
| Huawei Mate Xs | |
| Vivo X Fold | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G (20 - 27, n=3) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 129, n=207, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei Mate Xs 2 | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G | Huawei Mate Xs | Vivo X Fold | Average 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -10% | -22% | 31% | 21% | 28% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 1850.72 | 1934 4% | 1767 -5% | 1850.6 0% | 1846 ? 0% | 1887 ? 2% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 739.83 | 790 7% | 402.7 -46% | 1405 90% | 1199 ? 62% | 1471 ? 99% |
| Random Read 4KB | 260.49 | 215.5 -17% | 202.9 -22% | 293.4 13% | 282 ? 8% | 278 ? 7% |
| Random Write 4KB | 301.38 | 195.7 -35% | 259.1 -14% | 358.1 19% | 338 ? 12% | 311 ? 3% |
温度
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.9 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
演讲者
Huawei Mate Xs 2 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电池寿命
| Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing | |
| Average of class Smartphone (476 - 3244, n=209, last 2 years) | |
| Vivo X Fold | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G | |
| Huawei Mate Xs | |
| Huawei Mate Xs 2 | |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 有障碍的强烈概念
在日常使用中，我们非常喜欢将显示屏向外弯曲的折叠概念，尽管面板因此受到的保护较少。多任务处理是Mate Xs 2的真正乐趣，EMUI 12在视觉上是一个熟悉的伴侣，但我们在日常使用中怀念缺少的谷歌服务。同样，安装AppGallery中缺失的应用程序需要多花点功夫，但它们通常不能顺利运行。测试中出现的与Windows的连接问题让我们无法理解。
华为Mate Xs 2可能是一款强大的可折叠机，但电池运行时间和软件相当薄弱
与前代产品相比，华为智能手机向前迈出了一大步。特别是在价值和铰链结构方面，它显示出很大的改进。显示屏现在更亮了，甚至可以用120赫兹工作。然而，它不是LTPO OLED，这也可能是电池运行时间相当弱的一个原因。尽管SoC是去年的产品，但它提供了很好的性能。缺乏5G，缺少蓝牙的音频编解码器，以及相当慢的Wi-Fi更令人讨厌，尽管后者在日常使用中很少被注意到。
相机设置是令人信服的，但它不足以证明如此高的价格（建议零售价：1,999欧元）是合理的，特别是由于竞争对手一直都很便宜。这款 Galaxy Z Fold3和 折叠4在此值得一提。如果你不害怕进口，你可以选择 vivo X Fold是另一种选择。
价格和可用性
华为Mate Xs 2可以直接从华为在线商店购买。但也将从notebooksbilliger.de,Amazon和MediaMarkt提供。
Huawei Mate Xs 2
- 09/16/2022 v7 (old)
Daniel Schmidt
Price comparison
