Notebookcheck Logo

华为MatePad T10s评论。经济实惠的平板电脑,拥有大屏幕和儿童角

完美的儿童平板电脑?

尽管价格很低,但华为MatePad T10s想成为一切的首选平板电脑。然而,在我们的审查中,这款入门级平板电脑暴露了一些弱点,而这些弱点最好由三星Galaxy Tab A8和其他此类竞争平板电脑解决。
Touchscreen Tablet
测试华为MatePad T10s平板电脑

笔记本电脑 MatePad T系列是进入华为平板电脑世界的切入点。该 T10s型号是基于10.1英寸IPS显示屏,分辨率为1920 x 1200像素。由于179欧元(约179美元)的低建议零售价,这款中国多媒体平板电脑的基本版本只有2GB的工作内存和32GB的Flash存储。然而,后者可以通过一个微型SD存储卡进行扩展。

这款多媒体平板电脑的亮点之一是集成的立体声扬声器,它已经被哈蒙卡顿公司优化。除此之外,这家中国制造商还宣传说,由于采用了内部的高硅麒麟710A.我们将仔细看看MatePad T10s在日常使用中是否符合这些承诺,以及5100毫安时的小电池在本评论中的表现如何。

Huawei MatePad T10S (MatePad Series)
Processor
HiSilicon Kirin 710A 8 x 2 GHz, Cortex-A73/-A53
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-G51 MP4
Memory
4 GB 
Display
10.10 inch 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 224 PPI, capacitive Touchscreen, LCD IPS, glossy: yes
Storage
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 51 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3,5 mm jack, Card Reader: microSDXC (up to 512GB), Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration , OTG
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.1, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.85 x 240.2 x 159
Battery
5100 mAh
Operating System
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 5 MPix (f/2,2)
Secondary Camera: 2 MPix (f/2,4)
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, charger, USB cable, EMUI, 24 Months Warranty, widevine L1, fanless
Weight
450 g, Power Supply: 51 g
Price
219 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
80.9 %
v7 (old)
04 / 2022
Huawei MatePad T10S
Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4
450 g7.85 mm10.10"1920x1200
80.5 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2022
Teclast T40 Pro
T618, Mali-G52 MP2
480 g9.2 mm10.36"2000x1200
81 %
v7 (old)
02 / 2022
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
T618, Mali-G52 MP2
508 g6.9 mm10.50"1920x1200
84.1 %
v7 (old)
11 / 2021
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4
490 g7.5 mm11.00"2000x1200
74.3 %
v7 (old)
09 / 2021
Blackview Tab 10
Helio MT8768, PowerVR GE8320
523 g8.4 mm10.10"1920x1080

案例:华为平板电脑,边缘较宽

华为MatePad T10s深海蓝版
华为MatePad T10s深海蓝版

450克的华为平板电脑只有蓝色可供选择。从视觉上看,这款 MatePad T10s给人留下了高质量的印象,而且对于一款入门级平板电脑来说,其制造质量也处于良好水平。铝制背面符合人体工程学,由于采用了浅色磨砂处理,指纹不会立即显现。

正面完全由防刮的显示玻璃制成,与金属框架平滑地融合在一起。IPS显示屏周围的边框相当宽,这也反映在77%的屏占比上。

测试华为MatePad T10s平板电脑
测试华为MatePad T10s平板电脑
测试华为MatePad T10s平板电脑
测试华为MatePad T10s平板电脑
测试华为MatePad T10s平板电脑
测试华为MatePad T10s平板电脑
测试华为MatePad T10s平板电脑
测试华为MatePad T10s平板电脑

尺寸比较

258.4 mm 163 mm 7.5 mm 490 g248 mm 157 mm 9.2 mm 480 g246.8 mm 161.9 mm 6.9 mm 508 g243 mm 162 mm 8.4 mm 523 g240.2 mm 159 mm 7.85 mm 450 g210 mm 148 mm 1 mm 2.9 g

设备。带3.5毫米插孔的MatePad T10s

MatePad T10s有Wi-Fi和LTE两个版本。拥有32GB存储空间和2GB内存的入门级版本起价179欧元(约179美元),拥有4GB内存的128GB版本价格为249欧元(约259美元),而华为对带有LTE的平板电脑收费259欧元(3GB/64GB)。

我们的测试设备提供64GB的内部eMMC 5.1存储空间(建议零售价:219欧元)。扣除操作系统占用的空间后,仍有约51GB可供用户使用。需要扩大存储容量的用户可以通过高达512GB的microSD卡来实现。

平板电脑底部的USB Type-C接口也可以用来读取U盘中的数据,比如说视频。但是,需要一个相应的适配器,MatePad T10s中不包括这个。当然,其他外围设备,如外部键盘,也可以通过该端口连接。

外壳的左侧
外壳的左侧
外壳的右侧(按键、麦克风)
外壳的右侧(按键、麦克风)
上层外壳一侧(扬声器)
上层外壳一侧(扬声器)
底部外壳(卡槽、3.5毫米插孔、USB接口、扬声器)。
底部外壳(卡槽、3.5毫米插孔、USB接口、扬声器)。

微型SD卡读卡器

集成的microSD卡插槽支持当前的SDHC和SDXC标准。结合我们参考的Angelbird AV PRO V60卡,在跨平台磁盘测试中的表现是令人信服的。然而,MatePad T10s的复制速度相当慢,只有18MB/s。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
49.18 MB/s +175%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Angelbird V60)
20.4 MB/s +14%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
18.12 MB/s +1%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)
17.9 MB/s

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Huawei MatePad T10S Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø40.5 (23.8-57.4)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø32.7 (13.3-40.3)
Huawei MatePad T10S Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø76.1 (44.6-84.2)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø74.6 (37.9-86.8)

软件:没有GMS的华为平板电脑

华为依靠Android 10作为其入门级平板电脑的操作系统,并辅以高度定制的EMUI 10用户界面。虽然Android 基础已经过时,但华为仍然为MatePad T10s提供了最新的安全补丁,在测试时基于2022年1月的补丁。

正如已经知道的那样,这家中国公司的产品不支持谷歌服务,所以大多数谷歌应用程序和许多依赖谷歌游戏服务的第三方应用程序都不能使用。如果不采取变通办法,是不可能安装谷歌应用商店的,但华为的AppGallery与Petal Search和其他应用来源相结合,现在提供了一个可靠的应用选择。

尽管谷歌放弃了,但MatePad T10s确实支持Widevine L1级DRM。华为还将应用倍增器等有用的功能整合到Android 界面。同一应用的两个窗口在横向模式下同时显示,窗口的大小可以单独配置,这相当实用。

通过儿童角,华为还瞄准了Fire HD 10平板电脑市场,特别是 儿童专业版.该应用程序提供适合年龄的内容,并包括一个具有优化显示效果的眼睛舒适模式,以防止儿童的眼睛疲劳。

测试华为MatePad T10s平板电脑
测试华为MatePad T10s平板电脑
测试华为MatePad T10s平板电脑
测试华为MatePad T10s平板电脑

通信和GNSS: 带GPS的MatePad T10s

蓝牙5.0可用于无线通信,但没有安装NFC芯片。集成的Wi-Fi模块支持IEEE 802.11标准a/b/g/n/ac,因此在2.4GHz和5GHz频率范围内运行。

廉价的华为平板电脑和我们参考的华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000路由器之间的传输速度处于一个有点差的水平。然而,由于一般本地互联网合同的带宽限制,超过200Mbps的平均数据传输率应该只对极少数用户有限制。也就是说,MatePad T10s肯定不是很有前途的。

大型平板电脑的一个可能的应用领域是视频电话。我们用Skype应用程序查看了内置麦克风的语音质量。MatePad T10s的语音再现足够响亮,我们的对话伙伴可以很好地理解。然而,通过内置扬声器进行的音频再现混杂着混响,有时难以理解。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
343 (327min - 349max) MBit/s
Blackview Tab 10
PowerVR GE8320, Helio MT8768, 64 GB eMMC Flash
309 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Blackview Tab 10
PowerVR GE8320, Helio MT8768, 64 GB eMMC Flash
355 MBit/s
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
352 (334min - 359max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
349 (178min - 357max) MBit/s +46%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
346 (335min - 360max) MBit/s +45%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
239 (202min - 259max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
325 (163min - 328max) MBit/s +60%
Teclast T40 Pro
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
322 (315min - 326max) MBit/s +59%
Huawei MatePad T10S
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash
203 (158min - 227max) MBit/s
0153045607590105120135150165180195210225240255Tooltip
Huawei MatePad T10S; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø203 (158-227)
Huawei MatePad T10S; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø239 (202-259)
在建筑物内定位
在建筑物内定位
在户外定位
在户外定位

MatePad T10s使用GPS、北斗和格洛纳斯卫星网络进行定位。户外定位显示出良好的准确性,但定位本身需要相当长的时间,而且低于平均水平,信噪比值低于30。这款入门级的平板电脑不可能在室内进行卫星定位。

我们还检查了在4公里自行车骑行中的定位精度,并将其结果与 Garmin Venu 2s智能手表进行比较。在分析平板电脑的路线时,我们总是看到与我们的路线有较大的偏差。用MatePad T10s进行汽车导航绝对是可能的,但定位质量并不是毫无疑问的。在定位方面,支持A-GPS的LTE版本有可能比我们的Wi-Fi版本得分更高。

Garmin Venu 2s
Garmin Venu 2s
华为MatePad T10s
华为MatePad T10s

照相机:华为平板电脑有一个后置摄像头

与华为MatePad T10s的自拍
与华为MatePad T10s的自拍

一个200万像素的前置摄像头,光圈为f/2.4,位于显示屏的上框。照片质量处于低水平。细节几乎不存在,颜色看起来非常苍白。

背面安装了一个500万像素的单摄像头,光圈为f/2.2。在明亮的光线下,清晰度和图片细节比前置摄像头稍好,但这些照片总体上也缺乏清晰度。不过,颜色的再现要吸引人得多。

为了尽可能客观地评估色彩再现,我们在X-Rite ColorChecker Passport的帮助下,在人工光线下用MatePad T10s拍摄了更多照片。这里的颜色也被忠实地记录下来。

华为的平板电脑可以录制分辨率高达1080p的视频。前置摄像头只能进行高清录制。

8倍变焦(最大)
测试华为MatePad T10s平板电脑
测试华为MatePad T10s平板电脑
测试华为MatePad T10s平板电脑
测试华为MatePad T10s平板电脑

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Motiv 1 - TagMotiv 2 - TagLow Light
orginal image
click to load images
ColorChecker
13.8 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
11 ∆E
15.7 ∆E
13 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Huawei MatePad T10S: 11.25 ∆E min: 4.16 - max: 15.71 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.1 ∆E
55.1 ∆E
39.8 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
45.6 ∆E
62.4 ∆E
53.7 ∆E
36.1 ∆E
44.2 ∆E
29 ∆E
65.1 ∆E
64.1 ∆E
31.5 ∆E
47.7 ∆E
37.8 ∆E
76.8 ∆E
44.6 ∆E
42 ∆E
94.3 ∆E
71.4 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Huawei MatePad T10S: 47.15 ∆E min: 13.42 - max: 94.33 ∆E

配件和保修。华为平板电脑与电源适配器

华为MatePad T10s的10W电源
华为MatePad T10s的10W电源

MatePad T10s配有一个模块化充电器、一条USB-C电缆、一个弹出工具,以及一份快速启动指南和一张保修卡。内部在线商店还提供可选的配件,如保护壳。,用于该平板电脑。

保修卡 保修期保修期为24个月,其状态可在服务应用程序中轻松查看。

输入设备和操作。带有FaceUnlock的MatePad T10s

华为MatePad T10s的电容式触摸屏具有令人信服的滑动性,在精确度方面没有什么可抱怨的。华为的平板电脑能准确识别我们的手指输入。

二维人脸识别可用于生物识别安全。识别速度相当快;没有指纹传感器。

测试华为MatePad T10s平板电脑
测试华为MatePad T10s平板电脑
测试华为MatePad T10s平板电脑

显示。带有LCD的华为平板电脑

子像素表示法
子像素表示法

华为MatePad T10s的显示屏对角线尺寸为10.1英寸,采用16:10格式。这块IPS显示屏的全高清分辨率为1,920 x 1,080像素。实现的像素密度略低于224PPI,不是很高。此外,"智能分辨率 "是在出厂前预设的,这往往导致内容减少到720p。为了避免显示模糊,用户应该在初始设置时调整,因为固定的1080p分辨率明显更好。

屏幕的最大亮度只有285cd/m²。更现实的APL50测量,模拟面板上明亮和黑暗区域的均匀分布,显示出接近相同的306 cd/m²。尽管价格低廉的 平板电脑竞争 也没有提供明亮的显示屏,但MatePad T10s的亮度即使在这个价格范围内也很低,在明亮的室内环境中也处于边缘状态。

对于亮度控制,该平板电脑的显示屏使用类似于PWM的闪烁,频率低于最大亮度的15%,频率为100赫兹。然而,这并不是像OLED那样的经典PWM闪烁。

278
cd/m²
284
cd/m²
291
cd/m²
287
cd/m²
285
cd/m²
266
cd/m²
282
cd/m²
288
cd/m²
274
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 291 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 281.7 cd/m² Minimum: 2.2 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 285 cd/m²
Contrast: 950:1 (Black: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.53 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 6.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.044
Huawei MatePad T10S
LCD IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1"
Teclast T40 Pro
IPS, 2000x1200, 10.4"
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
TFT-LCD, 1920x1200, 10.5"
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
IPS, 2000x1200, 11"
Blackview Tab 10
IPS, 1920x1080, 10.1"
Screen
6%
-38%
9%
-54%
Brightness middle
285
433
52%
368
29%
410
44%
467
64%
Brightness
282
412
46%
346
23%
400
42%
445
58%
Brightness Distribution
91
86
-5%
91
0%
83
-9%
89
-2%
Black Level *
0.3
0.48
-60%
0.61
-103%
0.29
3%
0.66
-120%
Contrast
950
902
-5%
603
-37%
1414
49%
708
-25%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.53
3
15%
6.9
-95%
4.47
-27%
9.9
-180%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.84
7.2
-23%
11.4
-95%
8.84
-51%
15.66
-168%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
6.2
4.4
29%
7.7
-24%
5.1
18%
9.9
-60%
Gamma
2.044 108%
2.12 104%
2.16 102%
2.248 98%
1.72 128%
CCT
8130 80%
7003 93%
8547 76%
7966 82%
9142 71%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 100 Hz ≤ 15 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 100 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 15 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 100 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

这款显示器的印象相当复杂,对比度低于1000:1。0.3cd/m²的黑色值对于IPS面板来说是一个很好的水平,但是低亮度破坏了一个对比度更高的显示屏。

与ClariVu显示技术相结合,内容应该以亮丽的色彩呈现出来,但我们测量的DeltaE偏差不在理想范围内(<3)。然而,在 "暖色 "配置文件中,颜色的准确性以及显示的灰度等级的准确性在这个价格范围内是可以的。作为回报,sRGB色彩空间的覆盖率和色温都不太理想。后者导致显示内容有轻微的绿松石-蓝色偏移。

色彩准确度(目标色彩空间:sRGB;配置文件:标准,暖色)。
色彩准确度(目标色彩空间:sRGB;配置文件:标准,暖色)。
色彩空间(目标色彩空间:AdobeRGB;配置文件:标准,暖色)。
色彩空间(目标色彩空间:AdobeRGB;配置文件:标准,暖色)。
色彩空间(目标色彩空间:P3;配置文件:标准,暖色)。
色彩空间(目标色彩空间:P3;配置文件:标准,暖色)。
色彩空间(目标色彩空间:sRGB;配置文件:标准,暖色)。
色彩空间(目标色彩空间:sRGB;配置文件:标准,暖色)。
灰度(目标色彩空间:sRGB;配置文件:标准,默认)。
灰度(目标色彩空间:sRGB;配置文件:标准,默认)。
灰度(目标色彩空间:sRGB;配置文件:标准,暖色)。
灰度(目标色彩空间:sRGB;配置文件:标准,暖色)。
色彩饱和度(目标色彩空间:sRGB;配置文件:标准,暖色)。
色彩饱和度(目标色彩空间:sRGB;配置文件:标准,暖色)。
 

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17 ms rise
↘ 15 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
51 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 33 ms rise
↘ 18 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 86 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).


只有在非常低的亮度下,我们才会注意到100赫兹的PWM闪动。
只有在非常低的亮度下,我们才会注意到100赫兹的PWM闪动。
0% 亮度
0% 亮度
25%的亮度
25%的亮度
50%的亮度
50%的亮度
75%的亮度
75%的亮度
100%的亮度
100%的亮度

低对比度加上低亮度,使得在户外的可读性很差。内容在阳光直射下无法辨认--即使没有反射,面板也会达到极限。然而,在大多数情况下,亮度足以在室内使用。

由于采用了平面内切换技术(IPS)的液晶显示器,即使在平坦的视角下,显示的内容也是相对真实的颜色。然而,从侧面看时,可以明显感觉到亮度的下降。

测试华为MatePad T10s平板电脑
测试华为MatePad T10s平板电脑
测试华为MatePad T10s平板电脑

性能。配备麒麟SoC的MatePad T10s

海思麒麟710A 是一个八核SoC,基于麒麟710但采用14纳米FinFET工艺制造。与 麒麟960970该处理器集成了四个Cortex-A73,时钟频率为2GHz,四个Cortex-A53核心,在big.LITTLE配置中时钟频率高达1.7GHz。GPU是一个低性能的 Mali-G51 MP4.

由于适度的SoC,系统性能处于低水平。MatePad T10s经常显示滞后,在浏览器中滚动有时感觉不流畅。关闭和打开应用程序也感觉有点迟缓。即使是一个 三星Galaxy Tab A82022年与不常出现的搭配的UNISOC T618 也能提供明显更好的系统性能。

在CPU基准测试中,麒麟SoC明显落后于三星的竞争对手。A 联想Tab P11 Plus 配有 联发科Helio G90T的联想Tab P11 Plus几乎发挥了自己的优势--尤其是在单核领域。在GFXBench图形测试中也出现了类似的情况。在GFXBench图形测试中,也出现了类似的情况。 PowerVR GE8320Blackview Tab 10的性能缺陷更加明显。

MatePad T10s的性能瓶颈不仅是薄弱的芯片组--甚至连eMMC存储也很慢,这导致加载时间很长。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Tablet (140 - 1887, n=71, last 2 years)
707 Points +139%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
503 Points +70%
Teclast T40 Pro
380 Points +28%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
365 Points +23%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (296 - 304, n=4)
299 Points +1%
Huawei MatePad T10S
296 Points
Blackview Tab 10
152 Points -49%
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet (312 - 8624, n=71, last 2 years)
2496 Points +99%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
1557 Points +24%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (1256 - 1359, n=4)
1315 Points +5%
Teclast T40 Pro
1303 Points +4%
Huawei MatePad T10S
1256 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
1229 Points -2%
Blackview Tab 10
780 Points -38%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Tablet (3195 - 20841, n=73, last 2 years)
9812 Points +48%
Teclast T40 Pro
8364 Points +26%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
8346 Points +26%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
7447 Points +12%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (6622 - 7102, n=2)
6862 Points +4%
Huawei MatePad T10S
6622 Points
Blackview Tab 10
4564 Points -31%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
3374 Points +133%
Average of class Tablet (507 - 5864, n=18, last 2 years)
2615 Points +81%
Teclast T40 Pro
2140 Points +48%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
2084 Points +44%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (1445 - 1525, n=3)
1475 Points +2%
Huawei MatePad T10S
1445 Points
Blackview Tab 10
699 Points -52%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
3472 Points +160%
Average of class Tablet (454 - 6698, n=18, last 2 years)
2648 Points +99%
Teclast T40 Pro
1998 Points +50%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
1958 Points +47%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (1326 - 1493, n=3)
1384 Points +4%
Huawei MatePad T10S
1333 Points
Blackview Tab 10
630 Points -53%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
3283 Points +46%
Teclast T40 Pro
2850 Points +26%
Average of class Tablet (863 - 4085, n=18, last 2 years)
2806 Points +24%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
2692 Points +19%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (2191 - 2332, n=3)
2260 Points 0%
Huawei MatePad T10S
2256 Points
Blackview Tab 10
1136 Points -50%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Average of class Tablet (539 - 17675, n=29, last 2 years)
5834 Points +289%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
3128 Points +108%
Teclast T40 Pro
2158 Points +44%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
2105 Points +40%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (1501 - 1573, n=3)
1527 Points +2%
Huawei MatePad T10S
1501 Points
Blackview Tab 10
835 Points -44%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Tablet (485 - 35165, n=29, last 2 years)
8711 Points +542%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
3057 Points +125%
Teclast T40 Pro
2002 Points +48%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
1957 Points +44%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (1356 - 1452, n=3)
1389 Points +2%
Huawei MatePad T10S
1356 Points
Blackview Tab 10
774 Points -43%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Average of class Tablet (463 - 6449, n=29, last 2 years)
3648 Points +49%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
3438 Points +41%
Teclast T40 Pro
2969 Points +22%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
2862 Points +17%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (2441 - 2511, n=3)
2464 Points +1%
Huawei MatePad T10S
2441 Points
Blackview Tab 10
1152 Points -53%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
2483 Points +129%
Average of class Tablet (361 - 14235, n=47, last 2 years)
2050 Points +89%
Teclast T40 Pro
1456 Points +34%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
1425 Points +31%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (1082 - 1099, n=3)
1089 Points 0%
Huawei MatePad T10S
1085 Points
Blackview Tab 10
411 Points -62%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
2374 Points +149%
Average of class Tablet (290 - 24605, n=47, last 2 years)
2176 Points +128%
Teclast T40 Pro
1281 Points +34%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
1252 Points +31%
Huawei MatePad T10S
955 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (945 - 955, n=3)
950 Points -1%
Blackview Tab 10
348 Points -64%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
3183 Points +42%
Average of class Tablet (858 - 5751, n=47, last 2 years)
2796 Points +25%
Teclast T40 Pro
2783 Points +24%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
2768 Points +24%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (2203 - 2338, n=3)
2259 Points +1%
Huawei MatePad T10S
2236 Points
Blackview Tab 10
1130 Points -49%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Average of class Tablet (267 - 17674, n=67, last 2 years)
4452 Points +296%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
2694 Points +140%
Teclast T40 Pro
1526 Points +36%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
1463 Points +30%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (1121 - 1136, n=4)
1126 Points 0%
Huawei MatePad T10S
1124 Points
Blackview Tab 10
495 Points -56%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Tablet (240 - 29325, n=67, last 2 years)
5806 Points +492%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
2473 Points +152%
Teclast T40 Pro
1338 Points +36%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
1284 Points +31%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (981 - 988, n=4)
985 Points 0%
Huawei MatePad T10S
981 Points
Blackview Tab 10
425 Points -57%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Average of class Tablet (441 - 7451, n=67, last 2 years)
3620 Points +53%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
3375 Points +43%
Teclast T40 Pro
3007 Points +27%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
2865 Points +21%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (2365 - 2501, n=4)
2444 Points +3%
Huawei MatePad T10S
2365 Points
Blackview Tab 10
1171 Points -50%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
2684 Points +153%
Average of class Tablet (615 - 7863, n=50, last 2 years)
1959 Points +85%
Teclast T40 Pro
1518 Points +43%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
1488 Points +41%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (1052 - 1578, n=4)
1189 Points +12%
Huawei MatePad T10S
1059 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
2603 Points +173%
Average of class Tablet (521 - 10276, n=50, last 2 years)
2044 Points +114%
Teclast T40 Pro
1361 Points +43%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
1340 Points +40%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (911 - 1453, n=4)
1058 Points +11%
Huawei MatePad T10S
954 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
2774 Points +1106%
Teclast T40 Pro
2541 Points +1005%
Average of class Tablet (1370 - 4352, n=50, last 2 years)
2520 Points +996%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
2422 Points +953%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (230 - 2463, n=4)
1804 Points +684%
Huawei MatePad T10S
230 Points
Wild Life Score
Average of class Tablet (286 - 7933, n=60, last 2 years)
1743 Points +213%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
1344 Points +141%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
712 Points +28%
Teclast T40 Pro
709 Points +27%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (557 - 576, n=3)
566 Points +2%
Huawei MatePad T10S
557 Points
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Average of class Tablet (289 - 32525, n=72, last 2 years)
4578 Points +712%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
1387 Points +146%
Teclast T40 Pro
709 Points +26%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
708 Points +26%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (552 - 579, n=3)
565 Points 0%
Huawei MatePad T10S
564 Points
Wild Life Extreme
Average of class Tablet (75 - 8689, n=73, last 2 years)
1303 Points +752%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
380 Points +148%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
184 Points +20%
Teclast T40 Pro
182 Points +19%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (153 - 155, n=2)
154 Points +1%
Huawei MatePad T10S
153 Points
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Average of class Tablet (72 - 8889, n=71, last 2 years)
1543 Points +915%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
381 Points +151%
Teclast T40 Pro
180 Points +18%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
179 Points +18%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (152 - 158, n=2)
155 Points +2%
Huawei MatePad T10S
152 Points
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (14 - 144, n=67, last 2 years)
63.9 fps +68%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
58 fps +53%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
39 fps +3%
Teclast T40 Pro
39 fps +3%
Huawei MatePad T10S
38 fps
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (36 - 39, n=3)
37.7 fps -1%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (15 - 809, n=67, last 2 years)
187.6 fps +358%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
78 fps +90%
Huawei MatePad T10S
41 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
41 fps 0%
Teclast T40 Pro
41 fps 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (40 - 41, n=3)
40.3 fps -2%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Average of class Tablet (8.1 - 122, n=67, last 2 years)
52.1 fps +161%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
43 fps +115%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
25 fps +25%
Teclast T40 Pro
25 fps +25%
Huawei MatePad T10S
20 fps
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (15 - 20, n=3)
18.3 fps -8%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (7.3 - 530, n=67, last 2 years)
108.9 fps +289%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
48 fps +71%
Huawei MatePad T10S
28 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
26 fps -7%
Teclast T40 Pro
26 fps -7%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (19 - 28, n=3)
22.7 fps -19%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (4.8 - 120, n=67, last 2 years)
39.4 fps +181%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
26 fps +86%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
15 fps +7%
Teclast T40 Pro
15 fps +7%
Huawei MatePad T10S
14 fps
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (7.9 - 14, n=3)
12 fps -14%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (5 - 400, n=67, last 2 years)
78.2 fps +389%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
29 fps +81%
Huawei MatePad T10S
16 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
15 fps -6%
Teclast T40 Pro
15 fps -6%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (13 - 16, n=3)
14.7 fps -8%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (3.1 - 117.9, n=66, last 2 years)
24.6 fps +189%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
16 fps +88%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
9.2 fps +8%
Huawei MatePad T10S
8.5 fps
Teclast T40 Pro
8.1 fps -5%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (7.1 - 8.5, n=3)
7.9 fps -7%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (2.2 - 284, n=66, last 2 years)
46.4 fps +410%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
18 fps +98%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
9.7 fps +7%
Huawei MatePad T10S
9.1 fps
Teclast T40 Pro
8.7 fps -4%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (8.1 - 9.1, n=3)
8.57 fps -6%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (1.9 - 106.4, n=78, last 2 years)
18.6 fps +288%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
10 fps +108%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
6 fps +25%
Teclast T40 Pro
6 fps +25%
Huawei MatePad T10S
4.8 fps
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (4.4 - 4.8, n=4)
4.6 fps -4%
Blackview Tab 10
2.2 fps -54%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (0.9 - 114.5, n=78, last 2 years)
21 fps +624%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
6.7 fps +131%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
3.6 fps +24%
Teclast T40 Pro
3.6 fps +24%
Huawei MatePad T10S
2.9 fps
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (2.8 - 2.9, n=4)
2.88 fps -1%
Blackview Tab 10
1.4 fps -52%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (3 - 120, n=78, last 2 years)
26.9 fps +254%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
17 fps +124%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
9.9 fps +30%
Teclast T40 Pro
9.9 fps +30%
Huawei MatePad T10S
7.6 fps
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (6.7 - 7.6, n=4)
7.13 fps -6%
Blackview Tab 10
3.6 fps -53%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (2.5 - 340, n=78, last 2 years)
55 fps +1179%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
19 fps +342%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
10 fps +133%
Teclast T40 Pro
10 fps +133%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (4.3 - 7.6, n=4)
6.7 fps +56%
Huawei MatePad T10S
4.3 fps
Blackview Tab 10
3.9 fps -9%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (92766 - 1286774, n=49, last 2 years)
464403 Points +154%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
322048 Points +76%
Teclast T40 Pro
240502 Points +32%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
201310 Points +10%
Huawei MatePad T10S
182567 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A ()
182567 Points 0%
AImark - Score v2.x
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
13053 Points +193%
Teclast T40 Pro
4695 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
4659 Points +5%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (4455 - 4489, n=2)
4472 Points 0%
Huawei MatePad T10S
4455 Points
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Tablet (444 - 11721, n=59, last 2 years)
4210 Points +109%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
2948 Points +46%
Teclast T40 Pro
2145 Points +7%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (2013 - 2187, n=3)
2124 Points +6%
Huawei MatePad T10S
2013 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
1839 Points -9%
System
Average of class Tablet (1103 - 16435, n=59, last 2 years)
7279 Points +50%
Teclast T40 Pro
4863 Points 0%
Huawei MatePad T10S
4845 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (4598 - 4934, n=3)
4792 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
4729 Points -2%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
4273 Points -12%
Memory
Average of class Tablet (916 - 10977, n=59, last 2 years)
4874 Points +68%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
3632 Points +25%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (2772 - 3128, n=3)
2932 Points +1%
Huawei MatePad T10S
2896 Points
Teclast T40 Pro
1608 Points -44%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
970 Points -67%
Graphics
Average of class Tablet (580 - 57192, n=59, last 2 years)
9171 Points +532%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
3647 Points +151%
Teclast T40 Pro
2063 Points +42%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
2001 Points +38%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (1438 - 1572, n=3)
1487 Points +2%
Huawei MatePad T10S
1452 Points
Web
Teclast T40 Pro
1313 Points +37%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
1273 Points +33%
Average of class Tablet (10 - 2051, n=59, last 2 years)
1269 Points +33%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
1246 Points +30%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (956 - 1046, n=3)
1008 Points +5%
Huawei MatePad T10S
956 Points

Legend

 
Huawei MatePad T10S HiSilicon Kirin 710A, ARM Mali-G51 MP4, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Teclast T40 Pro UNISOC T618, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 128 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 UNISOC T618, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus Mediatek Helio G90T, ARM Mali-G76 MP4, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Blackview Tab 10 Mediatek MT8768, PowerVR GE8320, 64 GB eMMC Flash
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=69, last 2 years)
108.7 Points +259%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
43.98 Points +45%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus (Chrome 94)
35.48 Points +17%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (30.1 - 35.8, n=3)
32.1 Points +6%
Huawei MatePad T10S (Huawei V12)
30.25 Points
Blackview Tab 10 (Chrome 93.0.4577.62)
17.03 Points -44%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Teclast T40 Pro (Chrome 98)
75.3 Points +56%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus (Chrome 94)
70.6 Points +47%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
66.5 Points +38%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (48.1 - 48.5, n=2)
48.3 Points 0%
Huawei MatePad T10S (Huawei V12)
48.12 Points
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Tablet (34 - 435, n=45, last 2 years)
149.6 Points +172%
Teclast T40 Pro (Chrome 98)
76 Points +38%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
75 Points +36%
Huawei MatePad T10S (Huawei V12)
55 Points
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus (Chrome 94)
55 Points 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (55 - 55, n=2)
55 Points 0%
Blackview Tab 10 (Chrome 93.0.4577.62)
33 Points -40%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=63, last 2 years)
115.5 runs/min +350%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
33.35 runs/min +30%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus (Chrome 94)
31.4 runs/min +22%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (25.6 - 27.1, n=2)
26.4 runs/min +3%
Huawei MatePad T10S (Huawei V12)
25.64 runs/min
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=86, last 2 years)
28653 Points +187%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus (Chrome 94)
16947 Points +70%
Teclast T40 Pro (Chrome 98)
14722 Points +47%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
10787 Points +8%
Huawei MatePad T10S (Huawei V12)
9996 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (8911 - 10018, n=3)
9642 Points -4%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Blackview Tab 10 (Chrome 93.0.4577.62)
10760 ms * -161%
Huawei MatePad T10S (Huawei V12)
4122 ms *
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (3675 - 4411, n=3)
4069 ms * +1%
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=74, last 2 years)
3789 ms * +8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
3060 ms * +26%
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus (Chrome 94)
2793 ms * +32%
Teclast T40 Pro (Chrome 98)
2762 ms * +33%

* ... smaller is better

Huawei MatePad T10STeclast T40 ProSamsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022Lenovo Tab P11 PlusBlackview Tab 10Average 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
54%
5%
103%
-25%
10%
334%
Sequential Read 256KB
302.9
260.9
-14%
255.1
-16%
503
66%
263.6
-13%
Sequential Write 256KB
99
199.2
101%
101.1
2%
205.5
108%
135.3
37%
176.2 ?(40 - 274, n=203)
78%
Random Read 4KB
51.1
94.2
84%
68.3
34%
112.6
120%
31.37
-39%
Random Write 4KB
57.8
83.6
45%
57.5
-1%
126.1
118%
9.4
-84%

游戏。华为平板电脑可实现60帧画面

通过GameBench应用程序,我们仔细查看了一些游戏。这里的 芯片管理的最大帧率接近面板的原生60赫兹标记。然而,由于GPU功率不足,即使是像Armajet这样对图形要求不高的游戏,也只能勉强达到这个水平。

在MatePad T10s上可以流畅地玩像《PUBG Mobile》这样的图形要求高的游戏,但它停在30帧。不可能以最佳的超清画质播放射击游戏。

游戏爱好者还应该记住,由于缺乏谷歌游戏服务,一些游戏可能无法在华为的平板电脑上玩。

测试华为MatePad T10s平板电脑
测试华为MatePad T10s平板电脑
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Huawei MatePad T10S; Armajet: Ø57.4 (43-60)
Huawei MatePad T10S; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø30 (29-31)
Huawei MatePad T10S; PUBG Mobile; Balanced: Ø29.3 (24-31)
Huawei MatePad T10S; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø29.7 (24-31)

排放。MatePad T10s保持凉爽

温度

GFXBench基准电池测试
GFXBench基准电池测试

MatePad T10s的外壳在日常使用中几乎不发热,即使在负载情况下,我们也只测量到温度上升到最高34℃。

我们使用GFXBench的电池测试来检查外壳内部的散热情况。曼哈顿3.1测试清楚地表明,即使运行了30次,帧率也几乎没有下降,所以在负载下性能下降的可能性不大。

3DMark测试也显示了类似的情况。Wild Life压力测试也运行平稳,一致性超过99%。

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

012345678Tooltip
Huawei MatePad T10S Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.34 (3.33-3.35)
Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø4.27 (4.26-4.29)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.26 (4.25-4.27)
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø8.09 (8.08-8.11)
Huawei MatePad T10S Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.7.2: Ø0.92 (0.907-0.927)
Teclast T40 Pro Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.8.1: Ø1.097 (1.093-1.102)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.7.2: Ø1.096 (1.091-1.101)
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.5.1: Ø2.31 (2.28-2.31)
Max. Load
 32.1 °C33.8 °C32.5 °C 
 31.5 °C30.5 °C30.6 °C 
 31.1 °C30 °C29.8 °C 
Maximum: 33.8 °C
Average: 31.3 °C
32.1 °C34.4 °C30.3 °C
31 °C31.7 °C29.9 °C
29.4 °C30.6 °C29.6 °C
Maximum: 34.4 °C
Average: 31 °C
Power Supply (max.)  39.4 °C | Room Temperature 20.5 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.3 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.4 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.2 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
华为MatePad T10s平板电脑
华为MatePad T10s平板电脑

扬声器

MatePad T10s采用了由哈曼卡顿优化和调校的双扬声器系统。这两个音源的质量在这个价格范围内是令人满意的,但也不是没有批评的地方。

中音以及高音的重现不是很线性,而且低音也没有真正出现在平板电脑的声音中。反过来,我们测得的超过91dB(A)的最大音量是相当高的。如果你不把MatePad T10s的音量推到极限,你会得到一个体面的声音。

通过3.5毫米插孔进行音频输出也是可能的,并为你喜欢的耳机提供更好的声音传输。同时,可以通过蓝牙连接无线耳机。

然而,应该记住,这里只支持少数编解码器,即SBC和AAC以及HWA--由华为开发的低延迟的高分辨率音频编解码器。华为FreeBuds Studio使用的专有高清晰度编解码器(L2HC),以及高通或索尼LDAC的常见aptX算法对都没有支持。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2049.3522543.941.13137.134.54037.935.25043.842.76331.832.3802833.810027.942.312523.549.816023.856.320019.657.72501961.631517.566.740015.267.750016.870.56302172.480022.374.6100018.778.8125017.381160015.879.2200015.882.8250017.485.9315018.477.3400020.272.1500020.369.6630020.173.6800021.472.61000021.870.61250021.362.51600021.866.5SPL31.691.2N1.681.8median 20.1median 72.1Delta2.37.835.228.921.72018.622.421.720.43233.625.724.527.419.624.318.316.326.518.944.817.547.812.352.715.758.911.660.311.869.712.472.111.671.412.577.213.176.712.576.213.172.212.870.312.868.512.976.313.379.413.480.313.774.613.768.814.463.613.751.725.287.40.771.6median 13.1median 70.31.511.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHuawei MatePad T10SSamsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Huawei MatePad T10S audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 31% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理。华为平板电脑配备5,100毫安时电池

能源消耗

对于一款10.1英寸的平板电脑来说,无论是在空闲状态还是在负载条件下,功耗都不是很有效。总的来说,MatePad T10s的能耗明显过高,峰值时几乎为12W。

能源储备有些不足,标称电池容量为5100毫安时,这在华为平板电脑的运行时间中也很明显。使用附带的充电器,完全放电的电池可以在大约2小时45分钟内完全充电。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.6 / 2.8 / 3.5 Watt
Load midlight 7.9 / 11.5 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Huawei MatePad T10S
5100 mAh
Teclast T40 Pro
7000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
7040 mAh
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
7700 mAh
Blackview Tab 10
7480 mAh
Power Consumption
-1%
-9%
32%
-34%
Idle Minimum *
1.6
1.44
10%
1.19
26%
1.4
12%
2
-25%
Idle Average *
2.8
3.87
-38%
4.63
-65%
1.6
43%
6
-114%
Idle Maximum *
3.5
3.91
-12%
4.68
-34%
1.9
46%
6.1
-74%
Load Average *
7.9
7.1
10%
7.27
8%
5.3
33%
6.8
14%
Load Maximum *
11.5
8.88
23%
9.17
20%
8.7
24%
8.1
30%

* ... smaller is better

Leistungsaufnahme: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011Tooltip
Huawei MatePad T10S HiSilicon Kirin 710A: Ø6.81 (4.1-11.1)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 UNISOC T618: Ø5.07 (2.29-8.38)

Leistungsaufnahme: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

01234567Tooltip
Huawei MatePad T10S HiSilicon Kirin 710A; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø7.13 (6.8-7.44)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 UNISOC T618; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.62 (4.01-5.11)
Huawei MatePad T10S HiSilicon Kirin 710A; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.97 (2.9-3.05)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 UNISOC T618; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.42 (2.33-2.92)

电池寿命

不太理想的能源管理也反映在华为平板电脑的运行时间上。在我们的Wi-Fi测试中,调整后的显示屏亮度为150cd/m²,MatePad T10s只持续了9小时多一点。这款10.1英寸的平板电脑在停用WLAN的情况下无休止地播放视频内容也不是很有说服力,只能维持不到11小时。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
22h 34min
WiFi Websurfing
9h 17min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10h 25min
Load (maximum brightness)
2h 55min
Huawei MatePad T10S
5100 mAh
Teclast T40 Pro
7000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
7040 mAh
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus
7700 mAh
Blackview Tab 10
7480 mAh
Battery Runtime
45%
33%
37%
39%
Reader / Idle
1354
1973
46%
1798
33%
H.264
625
824
32%
993
59%
WiFi v1.3
557
806
45%
679
22%
814
46%
774
39%
Load
175
230
31%
194
11%

Pros

+ 做工良好
+ 坚固的扬声器
+ 几乎没有任何废热

Cons

- 性能低下
- 中等的电池寿命
- 暗色面板
- 糟糕的相机

关于华为MatePad T10s的结论

测试中的华为MatePad T10s。测试设备由nbb.com提供
测试中的华为MatePad T10s。测试设备由nbb.com提供

MatePad T10s是一款低价位的平板电脑,除了10.1英寸IPS大显示屏的好处外,还获得了很多妥协。然而,与目前价格水平的竞争对手相比,华为平板电脑也有一些积极的方面。例如,金属外壳的制造质量很吸引人,立体声扬声器非常响亮,声音也相当不错。此外,MatePad T10s从未真正发热,因此总能实现全部性能。这就是这款入门级平板电脑的弱点所在。

系统性能很差,因为麒麟710A的性能很低。 麒麟710A.在选择存储空间时,我们明确推荐配备4GB内存的机型,因为工作内存较少的版本可能会受到性能缺陷的影响,甚至比我们的测试样本还要大。以14纳米FinFET工艺制造的SoC的低效架构也反映在能源消耗上,并最终反映在低电池运行时间上。如果你想在一个廉价的平板电脑中获得大量的耐力,你最好选择一个 三星Galaxy Tab A8联想Tab P11 Plus,尤其是后者还提供了更多的性能。

凭借其低廉的价格和儿童角应用程序,MatePad T10s作为一款儿童平板电脑值得一看。

MatePad T10s不适合在户外使用。屏幕的最大亮度只有285cd/m²。想在花园或海滩上经常使用平板电脑的用户应该看看其他型号,如Teclast T40 Pro,它的亮度比华为的同类产品高50%以上。

价格和可用性

华为MatePad T10s在零售商,如Amazon.de,起价约150欧元。 nbb.com以及华为自己的商店.

Huawei MatePad T10S - 03/18/2022 v7 (old)
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
79 / 98 → 81%
Keyboard
67 / 80 → 84%
Pointing Device
88%
Connectivity
35 / 70 → 50%
Weight
84 / 40-88 → 91%
Battery
86%
Display
81%
Games Performance
14 / 78 → 17%
Application Performance
54 / 92 → 59%
Temperature
95%
Noise
100%
Audio
82 / 91 → 90%
Camera
51 / 85 → 60%
Average
71%
81%
Tablet - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 华为MatePad T10s评论。经济实惠的平板电脑,拥有大屏幕和儿童角
Marcus Herbrich, 2022-04- 3 (Update: 2024-08-15)