华为 MediaPad M3 8.4 平板电脑简短评测

Name: Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
Brand: Huawei

进化。 2015年推出的MediaPad M2的后续机型终于现身了：请欢迎MediaPad M3的出场。这台新机型在测试成绩上和前代机型几乎相同，不过搭配了更大尺寸更高分辨率的屏幕，更强劲的处理器和指纹感应器。我们将会通过详尽评测考察华为究竟带来了怎样的一款产品。

Andreas Kilian, ✓ Manuel Masiero (translated by Yuchen Wang), Published 11/26/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Tablet Touchscreen ARM

Test device courtesy of Huawei Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

MediaPad M3 (MediaPad M3 Series)

Processor

HiSilicon Kirin 950 8 x 2.3 GHz, Cortex-A72/-A53

Graphics adapter

ARM Mali-T880 MP4

Memory

4 GB

, LPDDR4

Display

8.40 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 359 PPI, IPS, 可视角度 80°/80°/80°/80° (上/下/左/右), 色彩: 1600万色, 对比度: 1,500:1, 亮度: 400 尼特, glossy: yes

Storage

32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB

, 23.04 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米耳机接口, Card Reader: microSD 最大支持 128 GB, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 加速感应器和霍尔感应器，陀螺仪，指南针, USB-OTG, Wi-Fi Direct

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 7.3 x 215.5 x 124.2

Battery

19.5 Wh, 5100 mAh Lithium-Polymer

Operating System

Android 6.0 Marshmallow

Camera

Primary Camera: 8 MPix (自动对焦 f/2.0, 1080p视频拍摄 @ 30 fps)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (定焦 f/2.0, 1080p视频拍摄@ 30 fps)

Additional features

Speakers: 立体声, Keyboard: 触控, 电源适配器，USB数据线，卡槽工具，屏幕保护贴膜, EMUI 4.1, Tablet-Manager, HiCare, Microsoft Apps, Facebook, Shazam, News Republic, Twitter, Booking.com, Instagram, 24 Months Warranty, fanless

Weight

310 g, Power Supply: 61 g

Price

349 Euro

Links

Huawei homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch Huawei MediaPad M2 Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A Apple iPad Mini 4 Xiaomi MiPad 2 Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE DIN A5 ❌

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Google Pixel XL 2016 Adreno 530, SD 821, 32 GB eMMC Flash	435 MBit/s +108%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A Adreno 510, 650 MSM8956, 32 GB eMMC Flash	264 MBit/s +26%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash	209 MBit/s
Lenovo Moto Z Play Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash	112 MBit/s -46%
iperf3 receive AX12
Google Pixel XL 2016 Adreno 530, SD 821, 32 GB eMMC Flash	515 MBit/s +146%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A Adreno 510, 650 MSM8956, 32 GB eMMC Flash	326 MBit/s +56%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash	209 MBit/s
Lenovo Moto Z Play Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash	121 MBit/s -42%

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

Huawei MediadPad M3

Microsoft Lumia 950 XL

Samsung Galaxy S7

Canon EOS 70D (Referenz)

click to load images

Huawei MediadPad M3

Microsoft Lumia 950 XL

Samsung Galaxy S7

Canon EOS 70D (Referenz)

click to load images

Huawei MediadPad M3

Microsoft Lumia 950 XL

Samsung Galaxy S7

Canon EOS 70D (Referenz)


438 cd/m²	461 cd/m²	445 cd/m²
441 cd/m²	460 cd/m²	423 cd/m²
436 cd/m²	468 cd/m²	436 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 468 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 445.3 cd/m² Minimum: 7.78 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 460 cd/m²
Contrast: 1022:1 (Black: 0.45 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 6.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.33

	Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch IPS, 2560x1600, 8.4"	Huawei MediaPad M2 IPS LCD, 1920x1200, 8"	Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A IPS, 2048x1536, 7.9"	Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE Super AMOLED, 2048x1536, 8"	Xiaomi MiPad 2 IPS, 2048x1536, 7.9"	Apple iPad Mini 4 IPS, 2048x1536, 7.9"
Screen
Brightness middle	460	463 1%	386 -16%	347 -25%	425 -8%	411 -11%
Brightness	445	445 0%	364 -18%	348 -22%	402 -10%	421 -5%
Brightness Distribution	90	92 2%	88 -2%	88 -2%	91 1%	91 1%
Black Level *	0.45	0.47 -4%	0.57 -27%		0.4 11%	0.58 -29%
Contrast	1022	985 -4%	677 -34%		1063 4%	709 -31%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	6.2	6.25 -1%	3.3 47%	1.67 73%	4.98 20%	2.15 65%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	10.5		7.1 32%		6.61 37%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	6.5	6.16 5%	1.7 74%	1.75 73%	5.2 20%	2.72 58%
Gamma	2.33 ^94%	2.43 ^91%	2.42 ^91%	2.27 ^97%	2.65 ^83%	2.29 ^96%
CCT	8056 ^81%	7921 ^82%	6397 ^102%	6361 ^102%	7249 ^90%	7012 ^93%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)				95.4

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 13 ms rise
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 23 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 93 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
59 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 16 ms rise
59 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 43 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 95 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch	1726 Points
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A	1480 Points -14%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch	5277 Points
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A	2691 Points -49%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch	3144 Points
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A	3121 Points -1%

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch	86735 Points
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A	71734 Points -17%
Xiaomi MiPad 2	73083 Points -16%

PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch	5204 Points
Huawei MediaPad M2	4358 Points -16%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A	6018 Points +16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE	5564 Points +7%
Xiaomi MiPad 2	5279 Points +1%

BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch	1022 Points
Huawei MediaPad M2	754 Points -26%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A	873 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE	952 Points -7%
Xiaomi MiPad 2	952 Points -7%
Apple iPad Mini 4	1059 Points +4%
Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch	1302 Points
Huawei MediaPad M2	820 Points -37%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A	1651 Points +27%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE	876 Points -33%
Xiaomi MiPad 2	1609 Points +24%
Apple iPad Mini 4	2668 Points +105%
System (sort by value)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch	3581 Points
Huawei MediaPad M2	1870 Points -48%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A	2076 Points -42%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE	2764 Points -23%
Xiaomi MiPad 2	1921 Points -46%
Apple iPad Mini 4	3132 Points -13%
Overall (sort by value)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch	1800 Points
Huawei MediaPad M2	1093 Points -39%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A	1475 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE	1044 Points -42%
Xiaomi MiPad 2	1419 Points -21%
Apple iPad Mini 4	1681 Points -7%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch	23 fps
Huawei MediaPad M2	14 fps -39%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A	27 fps +17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE	29 fps +26%
Xiaomi MiPad 2	13 fps -43%
Apple iPad Mini 4	37 fps +61%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch	29 fps
Huawei MediaPad M2	15 fps -48%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A	34 fps +17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE	24 fps -17%
Xiaomi MiPad 2	32 fps +10%
Apple iPad Mini 4	47.8 fps +65%

GFXBench 3.0
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch	13 fps
Huawei MediaPad M2	7.8 fps -40%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A	15 fps +15%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE	10.4 fps -20%
Xiaomi MiPad 2	8.4 fps -35%
Apple iPad Mini 4	21.5 fps +65%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch	9 fps
Huawei MediaPad M2	7.8 fps -13%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A	11 fps +22%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE	11 fps +22%
Xiaomi MiPad 2	6.3 fps -30%
Apple iPad Mini 4	15.3 fps +70%

GFXBench 3.1
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch	7.7 fps
Huawei MediaPad M2	0 fps -100%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A	9.5 fps +23%
Xiaomi MiPad 2	13 fps +69%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch	4.2 fps
Huawei MediaPad M2	0 fps -100%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A	6.1 fps +45%
Xiaomi MiPad 2	6.3 fps +50%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch	20230 Points
Huawei MediaPad M2	11605 Points -43%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A	18491 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE	19317 Points -5%
Xiaomi MiPad 2	25460 Points +26%
Apple iPad Mini 4	18737 Points -7%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch	22141 Points
Huawei MediaPad M2	11984 Points -46%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A	22306 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE	20006 Points -10%
Xiaomi MiPad 2	27537 Points +24%
Apple iPad Mini 4	25254 Points +14%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch	15538 Points
Huawei MediaPad M2	10447 Points -33%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A	11568 Points -26%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE	17240 Points +11%
Xiaomi MiPad 2	20142 Points +30%
Apple iPad Mini 4	9844 Points -37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch	2322 Points
Huawei MediaPad M2	1019 Points -56%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A	1450 Points -38%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE	1559 Points -33%
Xiaomi MiPad 2	1572 Points -32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch	832 Points
Huawei MediaPad M2	55 Points -93%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A	781 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE	612 Points -26%
Xiaomi MiPad 2	1261 Points +52%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch	970 Points
Huawei MediaPad M2	70 Points -93%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A	870 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE	707 Points -27%
Xiaomi MiPad 2	1319 Points +36%

Legend

Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch HiSilicon Kirin 950, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Huawei MediaPad M2 HiSilicon Kirin 930, ARM Mali-T628 MP4, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956, Qualcomm Adreno 510, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE Samsung Exynos 5433 Octa, ARM Mali-T760 MP6, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Xiaomi MiPad 2 Intel Atom x5-Z8500, Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), 16 GB eMMC Flash

Apple iPad Mini 4 Apple A8, PowerVR GX6450, 64 GB SSD

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | Octane V2 | WebXPRT 2015 | JetStream 1.1

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch	2823 ms *
Huawei MediaPad M2	11544 ms * -309%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A	3803 ms * -35%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE	6512 ms * -131%
Xiaomi MiPad 2	4420 ms * -57%
Apple iPad Mini 4	2557 ms * +9%

Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch	11404 Points
Huawei MediaPad M2	3866 Points -66%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A	8349 Points -27%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE	7097 Points -38%
Xiaomi MiPad 2	7994 Points -30%
Apple iPad Mini 4	9962 Points -13%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch	136 Points
Huawei MediaPad M2	67 Points -51%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A	103 Points -24%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE	79 Points -42%
Apple iPad Mini 4	144 Points +6%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch	53.7 Points
Huawei MediaPad M2	23 Points -57%
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A	45.9 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE	40.3 Points -25%
Xiaomi MiPad 2	43.04 Points -20%

* ... smaller is better

	Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch	Huawei MediaPad M2	Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A	Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE	Xiaomi MiPad 2	Apple iPad Mini 4
AndroBench 3-5
Random Read 4KB	32.04	25.09 -22%	52 62%	25.53 -20%	24.42 -24%
Random Write 4KB	31.35	13.44 -57%	6.91 -78%	9.68 -69%	13.96 -55%
Sequential Write 256KB	117.2	40.72 -65%	116.6 -1%	47.45 -60%	56.4 -52%
Sequential Read 256KB	249.7	145 -42%	252.3 1%	248.3 -1%	147.9 -41%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	23.52		20.61 -12%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	61.7		39.62 -36%
BaseMark OS II
Memory	2212	1235 -44%	1590 -28%	593 -73%	1379 -38%	902 -59%

Asphalt 8: Airborne
	Settings	Value
	high	20 fps
	very low	29 fps

Dead Trigger 2
	Settings	Value
	high	44 fps

Max. Load

Idle


31.5 °C	31.7 °C	34.4 °C
32.6 °C	32 °C	34 °C
33 °C	32.2 °C	34.8 °C

Maximum: 34.8 °C
Average: 32.9 °C


29.8 °C	30.9 °C	31.4 °C
29.7 °C	30.5 °C	31.7 °C
29.7 °C	31.4 °C	32.9 °C

Maximum: 32.9 °C
Average: 30.9 °C

Power Supply (max.) 31.8 °C | Room Temperature 21.2 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.9 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.8 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.9 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 65% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 65% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 68% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 66% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0 / 0.38 Watt
Idle	1.51 / 3.64 / 3.68 Watt
Load	6.95 / 9.11 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch 5100 mAh	Huawei MediaPad M2 4.800 mAh	Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A 4680 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE 4000 mAh	Xiaomi MiPad 2 6190 mAh	Apple iPad Mini 4 5124 mAh
Power Consumption		14%	14%	-13%	-44%	13%
Idle Minimum *	1.51	1.4 7%	1.01 33%	2 -32%	3.33 -121%	0.8 47%
Idle Average *	3.64	3.3 9%	2.71 26%	3.6 1%	5.01 -38%	3.6 1%
Idle Maximum *	3.68	3.4 8%	2.75 25%	4 -9%	5.19 -41%	3.9 -6%
Load Average *	6.95	5.5 21%	7.28 -5%	8.2 -18%	8.32 -20%	6.1 12%
Load Maximum *	9.11	7 23%	10.02 -10%	9.9 -9%	9.33 -2%	8 12%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		18h 30min
WiFi Websurfing		9h 06min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		9h 43min
Load (maximum brightness)		4h 28min

	Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch 5100 mAh	Huawei MediaPad M2 4.800 mAh	Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A 4680 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE 4000 mAh	Xiaomi MiPad 2 6190 mAh	Apple iPad Mini 4 5124 mAh
Battery Runtime		22%	-4%	10%	-23%	8%
Reader / Idle	1110	1546 39%	1147 3%	1399 26%		1488 34%
H.264	583	727 25%	574 -2%	780 34%		643 10%
WiFi v1.3	546	525 -4%	470 -14%	442 -19%	421 -23%	539 -1%
Load	268	343 28%	263 -2%	265 -1%		242 -10%

Pros

+ 不错的工艺品质

+ 坚固的金属机身

+ microSD卡槽

+ USB OTG功能

+ 高分辨率、明亮的屏幕

+ 实用的指纹感应器

+ 优秀的立体声扬声器

+ 低发热量

+ 出色的浏览器性能

+ 附赠屏幕保护贴膜

Cons

- 在高要求游戏中显卡负载过高

- 仅支持microUSB 2.0

- 无LED闪光灯

- 无附带耳机

- 不支持NFC

In Review: Huawei MediaPad M3 (BTV-W09). Test model provided by Huawei Germany.

华为MediaPad M2是一台有几处弱点的可靠设备。生产商延续了它前代机型的“可靠”设计方向，推出了这个新一代产品。它搭配了坚固的金属机身和优秀的扬声器，而在很多方面和前代机型十分相似。不过，华为也做出了战略性的改变：它的相机和处理器都更加强劲，IPS屏幕也带来了更高的分辨率。遗憾的是，后两项改变也带了一些负面影响：游戏并不总能够在原生分辨率下流畅运行，而电池续航（尽管提供了3000毫安时的更大容量）也在一些情况下有所缩短。值得庆幸的是，在上网浏览时，这台平板电脑提供了出色的电池续航。我们也十分喜欢它新搭配的指纹感应器，这可以帮助用户更方便地解锁设备。

MediaPad M3是一台易用的设备，但有几处弱点。由于工艺品质出色，屏幕明亮而分辨率高，浏览器速度快，这台平板电脑可以轻松的满足用户的日常使用所需。

如果你对它不太满意，我们建议考虑三星 Galaxy Tab S2 8.0。这台平板电脑提供了更薄的身形和高对比度AMOLED 4:3比例屏幕。不过它的前置摄像头品质不够理想。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch - 2016-11-16 11/16/2016 v5.1 ^(old)
Andreas Kilian

Chassis

87%

Keyboard

72 / 80 → 90%

Pointing Device

88%

Connectivity

43 / 65 → 66%

Weight

86 / 40-88 → 96%

Battery

91%

Display

83%

Games Performance

42 / 68 → 61%

Application Performance

58 / 76 → 76%

Temperature

92%

Noise

100%

Audio

71 / 91 → 78%

Camera

65 / 85 → 76%

Average

75%

87%

Tablet - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 华为 MediaPad M3 8.4 平板电脑简短评测

Andreas Kilian, 2016-11-26 (Update: 2016-11-26)