Notebookcheck Logo

Medion Erazer Major X20回顾:配备RTX 4070和坚实硬件的游戏笔记本

升级了。

Medion公司装备精良的游戏笔记本提供16:10格式的16英寸大屏幕(QHD+,240赫兹,G-Sync)、机械键盘、32GB的内存和高达2TB的存储空间。一个酷睿i9-13900HX和一个GeForce RTX 4070驱动这个强大的计算巨兽。
Gaming Geforce Intel Laptop / Notebook Raptor Lake Thunderbolt Windows

Medion Erazer Major X20主要是一款游戏笔记本,但也是为其他计算密集型应用场景而生。与它的前辈相比相比,X20得到了一些有用的升级:Arc A730M。 弧形A730M图形核心已经让位给明显更强大的 GeForce RTX 4070.此外,机械键盘取代了Chiclet模型,而两个USB-C端口(USB 3.2 Gen 2)中的一个已经被移除,剩下的一个已经升级为雷电4端口。

X20基于同方裸机(GM6PX7X),与XMG Neo 16的已知型号基本相似,但缺少水冷接口。竞争者包括笔记本电脑,如 Aorus 15X ASF,以及 Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 22)华硕ROG Strix G17 G713PI.

Medion Erazer Major X20
Processor
Intel Core i9-13900HX 24 x 1.6 - 5.4 GHz, 140 W PL2 / Short Burst, 140 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-HX
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU - 8 GB VRAM, Core: 2175 MHz, RAM: 2000 MHz, 140 W TDP ( including 25 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6, 31.0.15.3161, Optimus
Memory
32 GB 
, DDR5-4800, Dual-Chanel-Mode, two memory slots (both in use)
Display
16.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 189 PPI, BOE CQ NE160QDM-NZ1, IPS, glossy: no, 240 Hz
Mainboard
Intel HM770 (Raptor Lake-S PCH)
Storage
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R, 1024 GB 
, PCIe 4, M.2-2280, 1813 GB free
Connections
2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: Headset combined port, Mic-in, Card Reader: SD, SDHC, SDXC, TPM 2.0
Networking
Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 29 x 357 x 269
Battery
62.3 Wh, 4100 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webcam: FHD
Primary Camera: 2.1 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Mechanical, Keyboard Light: yes, Microsoft 365 (Trial), Microsoft OneNote (Trial), McAfee LiveSafe (Trial), 24 Months Warranty
Weight
2.366 kg, Power Supply: 980 g
Price
2499 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
89 %
v7 (old)
04 / 2023
Medion Erazer Major X20
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2.4 kg29 mm16.00"2560x1600
86.2 %
v7 (old)
04 / 2023
Aorus 15X ASF
i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2.3 kg19.7 mm15.60"2560x1440
89.9 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2023
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
2 kg16.99 mm15.60"2560x1440
88.4 %
v7 (old)
04 / 2023
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
R9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2.8 kg30.7 mm17.30"2560x1440

箱子--为Medion笔记本电脑提供一个隐蔽的外部。

Medion采用了别致、素雅的机箱,即使在专业环境中也不显眼。哑光黑色机箱的盖子背面由铝制成,基本单元由塑料制成。一个防滑橡胶涂层覆盖在基本单元的上侧。除了按键背光(RGB)外,后部通风口内的两个可自由配置的LED灯条(RGB)和盖子上的Erazer标志的照明,使这个看起来很严肃的箱子变得轻松起来。

这款16英寸的机箱没有暴露出任何制造上的缺陷。缝隙尺寸均匀,没有材料突起。底座只能轻微扭转,盖子更明显,但整个设备都在合理范围内。电池(用螺丝固定,不是用胶水)和其他内部组件在拆下底壳后可以接触到。铰链使盖子牢牢固定在位置上,最大打开角度约为130度。单手打开盖子是可能的。

在比较领域,Medion笔记本电脑是具有最厚的结构的设备之一。就重量而言,它处于中间位置。

尺寸比较

395 mm 282 mm 30.7 mm 2.8 kg357 mm 269 mm 29 mm 2.4 kg357 mm 274 mm 19.7 mm 2.3 kg355 mm 235 mm 16.99 mm 2 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

设备 - Major X20提供Thunderbolt 4

Erazer有三个USB-A端口(1个USB 3.2 Gen 1,2个USB 3.2 Gen 2)和一个USB-C端口(Thunderbolt 4)。后者输出DisplayPort信号,但不提供任何Power Delivery支持。Major X20还拥有总共两个视频输出(HDMI 2.1,DP)。进一步的连接包括一个电缆锁的插槽,两个音频插孔和一个千兆以太网端口(2.5Gbps)。

视频输出、电源插槽和网络端口都位于设备的背面。因此,相应的电缆从后面走,不会碍事。

左侧:电缆锁插槽、USB 3.2 Gen 1(USB-A)、麦克风输入、组合音频
左侧:电缆锁插槽、USB 3.2 Gen 1(USB-A)、麦克风输入、组合音频
后部:雷电4(USB-C;DisplayPort),HDMI,千兆以太网(2.5 GBit/s),电源接口
后部:雷电4(USB-C;DisplayPort),HDMI,千兆以太网(2.5 GBit/s),电源接口
右侧:存储卡读卡器,2个USB 3.2 Gen 2(USB-A)。
右侧:存储卡读卡器,2个USB 3.2 Gen 2(USB-A)。

SD卡阅读器

microSD存储卡读卡器(参考卡:AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)属于中等速度的型号,最大传输速率为78 MB/s(传输250个jpg图像文件,每个约5 MB)和88 MB/s(复制大数据块)。

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 202, n=89, last 2 years)
95.5 MB/s +22%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
80.8 MB/s +4%
Medion Erazer Major X20
Intel Core i9-13900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
78 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Average of class Gaming
  (25.8 - 269, n=90, last 2 years)
119.3 MB/s +36%
Medion Erazer Major X20
Intel Core i9-13900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
88 MB/s
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
84.1 MB/s -4%

沟通

在最佳条件下(附近没有WLAN设备,笔记本电脑和服务器PC之间的距离很小),WiFi数据率非常好。X20板上有一个WiFi 6E芯片(Intel AX211)。有线连接由Realtek的芯片(RTL8125;2.5 GBit/s)处理。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1662 (1535min - 1766max) MBit/s +18%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz
1650 MBit/s +17%
Medion Erazer Major X20
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1407 (1338min - 1463max) MBit/s
Aorus 15X ASF
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1248 (589min - 1505max) MBit/s -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (469 - 1843, n=151, last 2 years)
1235 MBit/s -12%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (464 - 1921, n=238)
1233 MBit/s -12%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Medion Erazer Major X20
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1707 (1657min - 1730max) MBit/s
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1680 (1647min - 1705max) MBit/s -2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz
1477 (1339min - 1623max) MBit/s -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (680 - 1890, n=151, last 2 years)
1383 MBit/s -19%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (582 - 1890, n=238)
1379 MBit/s -19%
Aorus 15X ASF
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1180 (1047min - 1233max) MBit/s -31%
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450150015501600165017001750Tooltip
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1407 (1338-1463)
Aorus 15X ASF Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1229 (589-1505)
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1651 (1561-1736)
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1663 (1535-1766)
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1707 (1657-1730)
Aorus 15X ASF Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1180 (1047-1233)
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1476 (1339-1623)
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1680 (1647-1705)

网络摄像头

网络摄像头(210万像素,最大1,920 x 1,080)提供标准质量。色彩精度不足:在色彩偏差约为11的情况下,目标(DeltaE小于3)被错过。机上没有机械快门。

ColorChecker
15.4 ∆E
14 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
8 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
1.5 ∆E
23.5 ∆E
8 ∆E
15.4 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
17.1 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
15.9 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
15.4 ∆E
12 ∆E
ColorChecker Medion Erazer Major X20: 10.63 ∆E min: 1.46 - max: 23.48 ∆E

辅料

除了通常的文件(快速入门指南和保修信息)外,笔记本没有包含其他附件。

维护

在卸下设备底部的所有螺丝后,可以用平铲或关节平滑器将底壳拆开。然后你可以接触到两个内存插槽(都被占用),两个固态硬盘(PCIe 4,M.2-2280),WLAN模块,风扇,BIOS电池和笔记本电池。

Medion Erazer Major X20的硬件
Medion Erazer Major X20的硬件

担保

Medion在德国为Erazer提供两年的保修。这在其他国家可能有所不同,所以买家在购买前应仔细检查。

保修期可以延长,但必须在Medion的网上商店与笔记本一起购买。后续购买是不可能的。

输入设备 - 带Cherry MX开关的机械键盘

键盘

Medion在X20中安装了一个机械键盘,而不是Chiclet键盘。Cherry MX开关的行程适中,有一个清晰可闻的压力点。用户可以享受到丰富的打字感觉和精确的反馈,而且键盘在打字过程中不会屈服。两个功能键可以调节四段式独立按键照明(RGB)的亮度。总的来说,我们可以说这是一个坚实的键盘。

触摸板

一个具有多点触摸功能的点击板(约11.6 x 7.2厘米)可作为鼠标的替代品。其光滑的表面使手指容易滑动。它提供短程和清晰的压力点。用手指点一下左上角的LED,就可以打开或关闭整个垫子。

Medion Erazer Major X20的键盘
Medion Erazer Major X20的键盘

显示屏 - QHD+,16:10格式

子像素网格
子像素网格

Medion安装了一个支持G-Sync的240 Hz面板。后者可以动态地调整显示器和GPU的刷新率,以创造尽可能平滑的画质--尤其是在游戏时。

PWM闪烁在任何亮度设置下都不存在。雾面16英寸面板(2560x1600)的亮度和对比度在适合工作的16:10格式中达到了相应的目标(>300 cd/m²或1000:1)。

346
cd/m²
345
cd/m²
349
cd/m²
348
cd/m²
374
cd/m²
362
cd/m²
357
cd/m²
369
cd/m²
364
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
BOE CQ NE160QDM-NZ1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 374 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 357.1 cd/m² Minimum: 19 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 374 cd/m²
Contrast: 1133:1 (Black: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.43 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1.4
ΔE Greyscale 3.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
70.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
69.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.191
Medion Erazer Major X20
BOE CQ NE160QDM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Aorus 15X ASF
BOE CQ NE156QHM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.6"
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung ATNA562P02-0, OLED, 2560x1440, 15.6"
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
BOE0B69, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3"
Display
-0%
25%
22%
Display P3 Coverage
69.4
69.3
0%
97.6
41%
98.3
42%
sRGB Coverage
98
98.2
0%
99.4
1%
100
2%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
70.9
70.5
-1%
94
33%
85.9
21%
Response Times
-12%
79%
21%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
13.1 ?(6, 7.1)
12.4 ?(6, 6.4)
5%
2 ?(1, 1)
85%
5.3 ?(2.4, 2.9)
60%
Response Time Black / White *
7.3 ?(3.1, 4.2)
9.4 ?(4.9, 4.5)
-29%
2 ?(1, 1)
73%
8.6 ?(3.7, 4.9)
-18%
PWM Frequency
500 ?(70)
Screen
14%
126%
12%
Brightness middle
374
316
-16%
383
2%
327
-13%
Brightness
357
301
-16%
384
8%
320
-10%
Brightness Distribution
92
90
-2%
99
8%
89
-3%
Black Level *
0.33
0.28
15%
0.03
91%
0.38
-15%
Contrast
1133
1129
0%
12767
1027%
861
-24%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.43
1.54
37%
1.89
22%
1.01
58%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.97
2.46
38%
3.76
5%
4.01
-1%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.4
1.21
14%
2.67
-91%
0.41
71%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.1
1.3
58%
1.26
59%
1.6
48%
Gamma
2.191 100%
2.307 95%
2.41 91%
2.168 101%
CCT
6194 105%
6456 101%
6386 102%
6659 98%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
1% / 7%
77% / 97%
18% / 16%

* ... smaller is better

屏幕在交付状态下产生良好的色彩表现:达到目标(DeltaE<3)时,偏差约为2.4。手动校准将偏差降低到1.4,并确保更平衡的灰度。

该面板完全覆盖了sRGB色彩空间,但没有覆盖AdobeRGB和DCI-P3色彩空间。如果需要所有三种色彩空间,则没有办法绕过刀锋15的OLED屏幕。

卡尔曼:灰度
卡尔曼:灰度
卡尔曼:色彩饱和度
卡尔曼:色彩饱和度
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN:灰度(校准的)。
CalMAN:灰度(校准的)。
CalMAN:色彩饱和度(已校准)。
CalMAN:色彩饱和度(已校准)。
CalMAN: ColorChecker (已校准)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (已校准)
Medion Erazer Major X20与sRGB的对比
Medion Erazer Major X20与sRGB的对比
Medion Erazer Major X20与AdobeRGB的对比
Medion Erazer Major X20与AdobeRGB的对比
Medion Erazer Major X20 vs DCI-P3
Medion Erazer Major X20 vs DCI-P3

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
7.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3.1 ms rise
↘ 4.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
13.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6 ms rise
↘ 7.1 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

视角稳定的IPS面板可以从任何位置阅读。如果阳光不太强烈,在户外阅读屏幕是可能的。

主要的X20户外活动
主要的X20户外活动
视角稳定
视角稳定

性能 - Raptor Lake和Ada Lovelace为游戏笔记本提供动力

游戏、渲染和一般所有性能要求高的应用领域都算在Erazer Major X20的应用场景中。Raptor Lake和Ada Lovelace提供了必要的计算能力。该模型的价格约为2500欧元(约合2500美元)。

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
Nvidia系统信息
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWInfo
HWInfo
 

测试条件

X20提供三种制造商特定的电源模式(见表),你可以通过一个单独的按钮(在电源按钮旁边)来选择。一个状态LED显示哪种模式处于活动状态。使用了 "涡轮模式"(基准测试)和 "办公模式"(电池测试)。Optimus是激活的。

可以使用预装的控制中心软件创建个人配置文件。例如,可以调整CPU的功率限制、GPU的TGP和/或温度上限。

我们使用CC软件的英语界面,因为德语翻译部分不成功。你可以在两种语言之间切换。

涡轮模式 (dt: Overboost) 平衡模式 (dt: Balanced) 办公室模式 (dt: Balanced)
CPU PL1 (HWInfo) 140 watts 140 watts 140 watts
CPU PL2 (HWInfo) 140 watts 140 watts 140 watts
噪音 (Witcher 3) 50-53 dB(A) 48-51 dB(A) 36-43 dB(A), 后来32-34 dB(A)
性能 (Witcher 3) 124 fps 118 fps 114-118 fps, 以后为30 fps锁定
Medion控制中心
Medion控制中心
Medion控制中心
Medion控制中心
Medion控制中心
Medion控制中心
Medion控制中心
Medion控制中心
Medion控制中心
Medion控制中心
Medion控制中心
Medion控制中心
Medion控制中心
Medion控制中心
Medion控制中心
Medion控制中心
Medion控制中心
Medion控制中心
Medion控制中心
Medion控制中心

处理器

芯片 酷睿-i9-13900HX处理器(Raptor Lake)由八个性能核心(超线程,2.2至5.4 GHz)和十六个效率核心(无超线程,1.6至3.9 GHz)组成。总共有32个逻辑CPU核心。基准测试结果与CPU的平均速率持平。

Cinebench R15基准的CPU测试是在主电源运行的高至最高时钟速率下进行的。与日常使用相关的单线程性能(222分),在电池模式下的下降幅度明显小于多线程性能(1025分)。

CB15循环测试显示,在主电源运行的多线程负载下,持续保持高涡轮增压时钟。在测试过程中,时钟速率只下降了很小的幅度。

多线程(主电源操作)
多线程(主电源操作)
单线程(主操作)。
单线程(主操作)。

Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load

02655307951060132515901855212023852650291531803445371039754240450547705035Tooltip
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX: Ø4327 (4285.41-4407.71)
Aorus 15X ASF Intel Core i7-13700HX: Ø2776 (2691.43-3460.13)
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H: Ø2191 (2149.96-2543.07)
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX: Ø4920 (4749.47-5204.94)
执行CB15循环时的CPU时钟速率(涡轮模式)
执行CB15循环时的CPU时钟速率(涡轮模式)
执行CB15循环时的CPU时钟速率(平衡模式)
执行CB15循环时的CPU时钟速率(平衡模式)
执行CB15循环时的CPU时钟速率(办公模式)
执行CB15循环时的CPU时钟速率(办公模式)
CPU Performance Rating - Percent
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
82 pt
Medion Erazer Major X20
Intel Core i9-13900HX
80.1 pt
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
 
80.1 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
65.4 pt
Aorus 15X ASF
Intel Core i7-13700HX
64.2 pt
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
51.7 pt
Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
32379 Points +17%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (24270 - 32623, n=22)
28225 Points +2%
Medion Erazer Major X20
Intel Core i9-13900HX
27788 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (5668 - 36249, n=193, last 2 years)
21651 Points -22%
Aorus 15X ASF
Intel Core i7-13700HX
20297 Points -27%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
15600 Points -44%
Single Core
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (1867 - 2105, n=19)
2044 Points 0%
Medion Erazer Major X20
Intel Core i9-13900HX
2036 Points
Aorus 15X ASF
Intel Core i7-13700HX
1897 Points -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (1088 - 2235, n=191, last 2 years)
1877 Points -8%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
1863 Points -8%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
1721 Points -15%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (9152 - 12541, n=20)
10766 Points +3%
Medion Erazer Major X20
Intel Core i9-13900HX
10484 Points
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
10025 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (2179 - 13832, n=191, last 2 years)
8240 Points -21%
Aorus 15X ASF
Intel Core i7-13700HX
7852 Points -25%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
6007 Points -43%
CPU (Single Core)
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (722 - 810, n=20)
784 Points +1%
Medion Erazer Major X20
Intel Core i9-13900HX
777 Points
Aorus 15X ASF
Intel Core i7-13700HX
726 Points -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (427 - 856, n=191, last 2 years)
722 Points -7%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
712 Points -8%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
662 Points -15%
Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
5205 (4749.47min - 5204.94max) Points +18%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (3913 - 4970, n=21)
4522 Points +3%
Medion Erazer Major X20
Intel Core i9-13900HX
4407.71 Points
Aorus 15X ASF
Intel Core i7-13700HX
3460 Points -22%
Average of class Gaming
  (905 - 5663, n=198, last 2 years)
3394 Points -23%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
2543 Points -42%
CPU Single 64Bit
Medion Erazer Major X20
Intel Core i9-13900HX
297 Points
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
294 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (247 - 304, n=21)
292 Points -2%
Aorus 15X ASF
Intel Core i7-13700HX
277 Points -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (176.6 - 318, n=195, last 2 years)
276 Points -7%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
249 Points -16%
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
220 Seconds * -95%
Aorus 15X ASF
Intel Core i7-13700HX
181 Seconds * -60%
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 555, n=186, last 2 years)
172.1 Seconds * -52%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (101 - 153, n=21)
117.9 Seconds * -4%
Medion Erazer Major X20
Intel Core i9-13900HX
113 Seconds *
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
100 Seconds * +12%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
123364 MIPS +9%
Medion Erazer Major X20
Intel Core i9-13900HX
113598 MIPS
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (90675 - 127283, n=20)
111796 MIPS -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (23795 - 140932, n=190, last 2 years)
84653 MIPS -25%
Aorus 15X ASF
Intel Core i7-13700HX
74733 MIPS -34%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
63825 MIPS -44%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
7332 MIPS +6%
Medion Erazer Major X20
Intel Core i9-13900HX
6895 MIPS
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (6340 - 7177, n=20)
6848 MIPS -1%
Aorus 15X ASF
Intel Core i7-13700HX
6407 MIPS -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (4168 - 7581, n=190, last 2 years)
6281 MIPS -9%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
5367 MIPS -22%
Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (17614 - 21075, n=21)
19809 Points +3%
Medion Erazer Major X20
Intel Core i9-13900HX
19213 Points
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
18372 Points -4%
Aorus 15X ASF
Intel Core i7-13700HX
15191 Points -21%
Average of class Gaming
  (4557 - 23194, n=191, last 2 years)
14891 Points -22%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
12215 Points -36%
Single-Core
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
2053 Points +1%
Medion Erazer Major X20
Intel Core i9-13900HX
2033 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (1345 - 2093, n=21)
1988 Points -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (986 - 2210, n=191, last 2 years)
1882 Points -7%
Aorus 15X ASF
Intel Core i7-13700HX
1860 Points -9%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
1661 Points -18%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
33.8 fps +17%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (23.5 - 34.4, n=21)
29.1 fps +1%
Medion Erazer Major X20
Intel Core i9-13900HX
28.9 fps
Average of class Gaming
  (6.72 - 38.9, n=190, last 2 years)
23.3 fps -19%
Aorus 15X ASF
Intel Core i7-13700HX
19.7 fps -32%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
17.3 fps -40%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
50.7 s * -20%
Average of class Gaming
  (31.4 - 96.6, n=187, last 2 years)
47.6 s * -12%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
45.7 s * -8%
Aorus 15X ASF
Intel Core i7-13700HX
43.6 s * -3%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (32.8 - 51.1, n=20)
42.5 s * -0%
Medion Erazer Major X20
Intel Core i9-13900HX
42.4 s *
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
0.503 sec * -28%
Aorus 15X ASF
Intel Core i7-13700HX
0.4403 sec * -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 0.759, n=191, last 2 years)
0.4402 sec * -12%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
0.4159 sec * -6%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (0.375 - 0.4564, n=21)
0.402 sec * -2%
Medion Erazer Major X20
Intel Core i9-13900HX
0.3922 sec *

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
4407.71 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
264.8 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
297 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
10484 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
777 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
27788 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
2036 Points
Help
Performance Rating
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
96.5 pt
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
 
65.8 pt
Medion Erazer Major X20
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
65.1 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
55.2 pt
Aorus 15X ASF
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
49.8 pt
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
42.4 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
52479 KRay/s +109%
Medion Erazer Major X20
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
25147 KRay/s
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (17589 - 27615, n=21)
24097 KRay/s -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (4986 - 60169, n=187, last 2 years)
21640 KRay/s -14%
Aorus 15X ASF
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
17289 KRay/s -31%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
13493 KRay/s -46%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
227882 Points +82%
Medion Erazer Major X20
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
125161 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (88686 - 137015, n=21)
120602 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (25360 - 252486, n=187, last 2 years)
106090 Points -15%
Aorus 15X ASF
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
86201 Points -31%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
71736 Points -43%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
8525 MB/s +37%
Medion Erazer Major X20
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
6234 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (4362 - 7029, n=21)
6061 MB/s -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (1339 - 10389, n=187, last 2 years)
4852 MB/s -22%
Aorus 15X ASF
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
3879 MB/s -38%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
3400 MB/s -45%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
180473 Points +35%
Medion Erazer Major X20
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
134141 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (125644 - 141385, n=21)
133924 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (50699 - 200651, n=187, last 2 years)
116237 Points -13%
Aorus 15X ASF
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
110085 Points -18%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
106137 Points -21%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
29598 Points +93%
Medion Erazer Major X20
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
15349 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (12334 - 17179, n=21)
14889 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (4800 - 32988, n=187, last 2 years)
13175 Points -14%
Aorus 15X ASF
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
11602 Points -24%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
9706 Points -37%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
118401 Points +88%
Medion Erazer Major X20
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
62932 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (43850 - 69202, n=21)
59821 Points -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (12321 - 134044, n=187, last 2 years)
53471 Points -15%
Aorus 15X ASF
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
42851 Points -32%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
34034 Points -46%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
167732 MB/s +40%
Aorus 15X ASF
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
147294 MB/s +23%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (89413 - 237881, n=21)
139015 MB/s +16%
Medion Erazer Major X20
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
119757 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (19065 - 328679, n=187, last 2 years)
109176 MB/s -9%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
99217 MB/s -17%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2090 MB/s +16%
Medion Erazer Major X20
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1804 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (1284 - 1958, n=21)
1755 MB/s -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (373 - 2409, n=187, last 2 years)
1349 MB/s -25%
Aorus 15X ASF
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1092 MB/s -39%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
1064 MB/s -41%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
28105 KRay/s +105%
Medion Erazer Major X20
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
13736 KRay/s
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (9481 - 15279, n=21)
13066 KRay/s -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (2540 - 31796, n=187, last 2 years)
11654 KRay/s -15%
Aorus 15X ASF
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
9194 KRay/s -33%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
7268 KRay/s -47%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (42994 - 51994, n=21)
48439 MPixel/s +13%
Medion Erazer Major X20
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
42994 MPixel/s
Average of class Gaming
  (10805 - 60161, n=188, last 2 years)
39919 MPixel/s -7%
Aorus 15X ASF
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
35342 MPixel/s -18%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
34573 MPixel/s -20%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
34312 MPixel/s -20%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
31421 MPixel/s -27%

系统性能

运行平稳的系统并不缺乏计算能力。笔记本电脑处理游戏、渲染和视频编辑没有问题,良好的PCMark结果证实了这一点。对于DDR5-4800内存来说,内存的传输率处于正常水平。

该RAM在双通道模式下运行。
该RAM在双通道模式下运行。
PCMark 10 / Score
Average of class Gaming
  (5776 - 9852, n=168, last 2 years)
7774 Points +3%
Medion Erazer Major X20
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
7575 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (6956 - 8153, n=3)
7561 Points 0%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
7449 Points -2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7336 Points -3%
Aorus 15X ASF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
7178 Points -5%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Medion Erazer Major X20
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
11653 Points
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
11166 Points -4%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (9865 - 11653, n=3)
10940 Points -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (9057 - 12334, n=167, last 2 years)
10836 Points -7%
Aorus 15X ASF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
10705 Points -8%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10328 Points -11%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
11087 Points +13%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10024 Points +2%
Average of class Gaming
  (6662 - 14612, n=167, last 2 years)
9878 Points 0%
Medion Erazer Major X20
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
9850 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (9470 - 9850, n=3)
9685 Points -2%
Aorus 15X ASF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
9637 Points -2%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Average of class Gaming
  (6703 - 18475, n=167, last 2 years)
12030 Points +17%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (9776 - 13370, n=3)
11141 Points +8%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10350 Points +1%
Medion Erazer Major X20
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
10278 Points
Aorus 15X ASF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
9731 Points -5%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
9062 Points -12%
CrossMark / Overall
Aorus 15X ASF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
2065 Points +12%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2037 Points +11%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (1842 - 2029, n=3)
1947 Points +6%
Average of class Gaming
  (1247 - 2344, n=151, last 2 years)
1899 Points +3%
Medion Erazer Major X20
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
1842 Points
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1730 Points -6%
CrossMark / Productivity
Aorus 15X ASF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1960 Points +15%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1917 Points +13%
Average of class Gaming
  (1299 - 2204, n=151, last 2 years)
1801 Points +6%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (1700 - 1872, n=3)
1795 Points +6%
Medion Erazer Major X20
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
1700 Points
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1641 Points -3%
CrossMark / Creativity
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2313 Points +11%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (2088 - 2316, n=3)
2238 Points +7%
Aorus 15X ASF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
2193 Points +5%
Medion Erazer Major X20
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
2088 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (1275 - 2660, n=151, last 2 years)
2083 Points 0%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1883 Points -10%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Aorus 15X ASF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
2016 Points +25%
Average of class Gaming
  (1030 - 2330, n=151, last 2 years)
1699 Points +6%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1671 Points +4%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (1557 - 1752, n=3)
1639 Points +2%
Medion Erazer Major X20
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
1608 Points
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1573 Points -2%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4889 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
6067 points
PCMark 10 Score
7575 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (67716 - 78835, n=21)
75033 MB/s +11%
Medion Erazer Major X20
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
67755 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (21842 - 94222, n=187, last 2 years)
64907 MB/s -4%
Aorus 15X ASF
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
57467 MB/s -15%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
55639 MB/s -18%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
48948 MB/s -28%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (73998 - 88462, n=21)
82199 MB/s +11%
Medion Erazer Major X20
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
73998 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (23681 - 99713, n=187, last 2 years)
68658 MB/s -7%
Aorus 15X ASF
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
66898 MB/s -10%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
61461 MB/s -17%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
59759 MB/s -19%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (65472 - 77045, n=21)
73168 MB/s +12%
Average of class Gaming
  (22986 - 108954, n=187, last 2 years)
66727 MB/s +2%
Medion Erazer Major X20
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
65604 MB/s
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
58602 MB/s -11%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
58073 MB/s -11%
Aorus 15X ASF
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
55411 MB/s -16%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
99.4 ns * -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (59.5 - 259, n=187, last 2 years)
94.1 ns * -4%
Medion Erazer Major X20
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
90.6 ns *
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
86.8 ns * +4%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (80.4 - 91.1, n=21)
86.3 ns * +5%
Aorus 15X ASF
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
86.2 ns * +5%

* ... smaller is better

DPC延时

标准化的延迟监测测试(网络冲浪、4k视频播放、Prime95高负荷)发现了一些异常情况。该系统似乎不适合实时视频和音频编辑。未来的软件更新可能会改善这一点,或导致进一步恶化。

延迟监测
延迟监测
延迟监测
延迟监测
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Aorus 15X ASF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1813 μs * -3%
Medion Erazer Major X20
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
1752.1 μs *
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1489 μs * +15%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
933.2 μs * +47%

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

Erazer装有两块来自Phison的1TB固态硬盘(PCIe 4,M.2-2280),总体上提供了良好的性能率。固态硬盘没有形成RAID阵列,X20也没有提供RAID支持--一个固态硬盘作为系统驱动器,另一个作为数据存储。一个积极的方面是:没有观察到热节流现象。

X20板上有两个PCIe-4固态硬盘。
X20板上有两个PCIe-4固态硬盘。
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7038 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 5008 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 942.2 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 783.9 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 3007 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 3328 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 57.06 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 263.2 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Aorus 15X ASF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
92.6 pt
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
 
85.5 pt
Medion Erazer Major X20
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
80.8 pt
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
80.5 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
73.9 pt
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
51.4 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3564 (3515.46min - 3563.69max) MB/s +13%
Average of class Gaming
  (1319 - 7045, n=168, last 2 years)
3487 MB/s +11%
Aorus 15X ASF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3419 (3322.79min - 3419.41max) MB/s +8%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3377 (3319.03min - 3377.04max) MB/s +7%
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
  (3127 - 3582, n=3)
3287 MB/s +4%
Medion Erazer Major X20
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
3153 (2810.23min - 3153.26max) MB/s
seq write
Average of class Gaming
  (535 - 9307, n=168, last 2 years)
3797 MB/s +51%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3531 (3391.93min - 3530.77max) MB/s +41%
Aorus 15X ASF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3270 (3004.03min - 3269.84max) MB/s +30%
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
  (2507 - 3714, n=3)
3146 MB/s +25%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2743 (2563.98min - 2742.87max) MB/s +9%
Medion Erazer Major X20
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
2507 MB/s
seq q8 t1 read
Aorus 15X ASF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
7018 (6152.48min - 7017.7max) MB/s +1%
Medion Erazer Major X20
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
6966 (5571.08min - 6965.69max) MB/s
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
  (6956 - 6976, n=3)
6966 MB/s 0%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6663 (6017.91min - 6663.07max) MB/s -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (2594 - 16089, n=168, last 2 years)
6328 MB/s -9%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
5018 (4382.25min - 5017.89max) MB/s -28%
seq q8 t1 write
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4980 (4904.66min - 4979.58max) MB/s +34%
Average of class Gaming
  (539 - 14571, n=168, last 2 years)
4823 MB/s +30%
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
  (3723 - 5011, n=3)
4573 MB/s +23%
Aorus 15X ASF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
4398 (3867.15min - 4398.16max) MB/s +18%
Medion Erazer Major X20
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
3723 (3590.69min - 3723.28max) MB/s
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3125 (3099.17min - 3124.97max) MB/s -16%
4k q1 t1 read
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
81.2 (79.58min - 81.23max) MB/s +42%
Aorus 15X ASF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
73.5 (69.87min - 73.51max) MB/s +28%
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
  (56.8 - 84.3, n=3)
66.1 MB/s +16%
Average of class Gaming
  (30.6 - 95.9, n=168, last 2 years)
65.8 MB/s +15%
Medion Erazer Major X20
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
57.2 (55.31min - 57.16max) MB/s
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
53.7 (52.37min - 53.65max) MB/s -6%
4k q1 t1 write
Aorus 15X ASF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
346 (334.68min - 346.11max) MB/s +26%
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
  (275 - 295, n=3)
284 MB/s +3%
Medion Erazer Major X20
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
275 (272.08min - 274.75max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (66.6 - 397, n=168, last 2 years)
222 MB/s -19%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
212 (209.62min - 211.78max) MB/s -23%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
163.8 (162.54min - 163.76max) MB/s -40%
4k q32 t16 read
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4152 (4133.05min - 4152.1max) MB/s +16%
Medion Erazer Major X20
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
3578 (3566.03min - 3578.13max) MB/s
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
  (3543 - 3578, n=3)
3557 MB/s -1%
Aorus 15X ASF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3552 (3501.51min - 3552.08max) MB/s -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (417 - 6172, n=168, last 2 years)
2555 MB/s -29%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
857 (717.83min - 857.03max) MB/s -76%
4k q32 t16 write
Aorus 15X ASF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3610 (3279.33min - 3609.84max) MB/s 0%
Medion Erazer Major X20
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
3607 (3566.02min - 3606.71max) MB/s
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
  (3398 - 3688, n=3)
3564 MB/s -1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3512 (3421.77min - 3511.78max) MB/s -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (162.3 - 4869, n=168, last 2 years)
2101 MB/s -42%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
305 (269.91min - 305.05max) MB/s -92%
AS SSD
Score Total
Aorus 15X ASF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
9097 Points +7%
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
  (8477 - 8906, n=3)
8641 Points +1%
Medion Erazer Major X20
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
8541 Points
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7180 Points -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (2271 - 13854, n=159, last 2 years)
6737 Points -21%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
4118 Points -52%
Score Read
Aorus 15X ASF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3530 Points +6%
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
  (3332 - 3464, n=3)
3397 Points +2%
Medion Erazer Major X20
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
3332 Points
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2858 Points -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (776 - 4721, n=159, last 2 years)
2441 Points -27%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1204 Points -64%
Score Write
Aorus 15X ASF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3794 Points +6%
Medion Erazer Major X20
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
3583 Points
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
  (3399 - 3707, n=3)
3563 Points -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (515 - 7208, n=159, last 2 years)
3113 Points -13%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2916 Points -19%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2387 Points -33%
Seq Read
Average of class Gaming
  (2260 - 12763, n=159, last 2 years)
4944 MB/s +4%
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
  (4774 - 5200, n=3)
4925 MB/s +3%
Medion Erazer Major X20
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
4774.16 MB/s
Aorus 15X ASF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
4649.46 MB/s -3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4623.95 MB/s -3%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3846 MB/s -19%
Seq Write
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
  (3290 - 4309, n=3)
3842 MB/s +17%
Aorus 15X ASF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3810.26 MB/s +16%
Average of class Gaming
  (495 - 11316, n=159, last 2 years)
3720 MB/s +13%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3551.32 MB/s +8%
Medion Erazer Major X20
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
3289.95 MB/s
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1821 MB/s -45%
4K Read
Aorus 15X ASF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
100.75 MB/s +44%
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
  (60.6 - 97.3, n=3)
76 MB/s +9%
Medion Erazer Major X20
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
69.95 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (27.8 - 112.1, n=159, last 2 years)
65.1 MB/s -7%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
60.3 MB/s -14%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
51.29 MB/s -27%
4K Write
Aorus 15X ASF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
308.92 MB/s +83%
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
  (168.4 - 294, n=3)
213 MB/s +26%
Average of class Gaming
  (108.8 - 512, n=159, last 2 years)
211 MB/s +25%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
196.8 MB/s +17%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
183.9 MB/s +9%
Medion Erazer Major X20
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
168.39 MB/s
4K-64 Read
Aorus 15X ASF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
2964.13 MB/s +6%
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
  (2784 - 2854, n=3)
2828 MB/s +2%
Medion Erazer Major X20
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
2784.37 MB/s
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2335.71 MB/s -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (451 - 3475, n=159, last 2 years)
1876 MB/s -33%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
768 MB/s -72%
4K-64 Write
Aorus 15X ASF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3103.89 MB/s +1%
Medion Erazer Major X20
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
3085.54 MB/s
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
  (2831 - 3086, n=3)
2966 MB/s -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (277 - 5909, n=159, last 2 years)
2533 MB/s -18%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2376.83 MB/s -23%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2008 MB/s -35%
Access Time Read
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
0.121 ms * -55%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.083 ms * -6%
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
  (0.078 - 0.086, n=3)
0.083 ms * -6%
Medion Erazer Major X20
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
0.078 ms *
Aorus 15X ASF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
0.068 ms * +13%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.016 - 0.379, n=158, last 2 years)
0.05509 ms * +29%
Access Time Write
Average of class Gaming
  (0.011 - 1.028, n=159, last 2 years)
0.04843 ms * -111%
Medion Erazer Major X20
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
0.023 ms *
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.022 ms * +4%
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
  (0.013 - 0.023, n=3)
0.01967 ms * +14%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
0.019 ms * +17%
Aorus 15X ASF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
0.012 ms * +48%

* ... smaller is better

Sustained Read Performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

035571010651420177521302485284031953550390542604615497053255680603563906745Tooltip
Medion Erazer Major X20 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R: Ø6907 (6078.6-6965.9)
Aorus 15X ASF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10: Ø6780 (4751.1-7024.62)
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR: Ø6602 (5678.43-6643.28)
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00: Ø5008 (4471.34-5022.68)

图形卡

没有(更多)实验:当Medion将英特尔当时新推出的Arc GPU中的一个安装到主要的X10,而X20则配备了一个 GeForce RTX 4070笔记本卡(VRAM:8,192 GB GDDR6),来自Nvidia。这款产品的最大可能TGP为140瓦(115瓦+25瓦动态提升),根据Witcher 3 测试,这款产品没有得到充分利用。

基准测试结果高于之前RTX 4070的平均水平--与Arc A730M相比,性能有显著提高。弧形A730MdGPU模式并没有带来任何改进。在dGPU和Optimus之间切换不需要重启 - 支持高级Optimus。

Fire Strike (主电源操作,涡轮模式)
Fire Strike (主电源操作,涡轮模式)
Fire Strike (电池操作,涡轮模式)
Fire Strike (电池操作,涡轮模式)
Fire Strike (主电源操作,平衡模式)
Fire Strike (主电源操作,平衡模式)
Fire Strike (主电源操作,办公室模式)
Fire Strike (主电源操作,办公室模式)
Fire Strike (主电源操作,涡轮模式,dGPU)
Fire Strike (主电源操作,涡轮模式,dGPU)
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming
 
96.4 pt
Aorus 15X ASF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX
95.9 pt
Medion Erazer Major X20
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
95.4 pt
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
94.3 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
 
90.9 pt
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
83.7 pt
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Arc A730M, Intel Core i7-12700H
59.5 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72178, n=186, last 2 years)
43521 Points +2%
Medion Erazer Major X20
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
42773 Points
Aorus 15X ASF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX
41422 Points -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (24229 - 46434, n=59)
40410 Points -6%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
39104 Points -9%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
36023 Points -16%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Arc A730M, Intel Core i7-12700H
26822 Points -37%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Aorus 15X ASF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX
166954 Points +13%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
165811 Points +12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (54238 - 193851, n=24)
148053 Points 0%
Medion Erazer Major X20
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
147464 Points
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
145558 Points -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (15902 - 193851, n=101, last 2 years)
142796 Points -3%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Arc A730M, Intel Core i7-12700H
75370 Points -49%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=196, last 2 years)
31245 Points +1%
Medion Erazer Major X20
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
30809 Points
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
30596 Points -1%
Aorus 15X ASF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX
29950 Points -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (12242 - 33451, n=62)
29041 Points -6%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
27183 Points -12%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Arc A730M, Intel Core i7-12700H
20179 Points -35%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22717, n=191, last 2 years)
13034 Points +4%
Medion Erazer Major X20
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
12551 Points
Aorus 15X ASF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX
12042 Points -4%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
11761 Points -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (5012 - 13391, n=60)
11603 Points -8%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
10157 Points -19%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Arc A730M, Intel Core i7-12700H
8677 Points -31%
3DMark 06 Standard Score
60496 points
3DMark 11 Performance
35727 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
66380 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
27130 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
12846 points
Help
Blender
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
26 Seconds * -37%
Aorus 15X ASF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX
22 Seconds * -16%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (18 - 30, n=60)
21.5 Seconds * -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (9 - 95, n=177, last 2 years)
21 Seconds * -11%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
20 Seconds * -5%
Medion Erazer Major X20
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
19 Seconds *
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
45 Seconds * -36%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (32 - 181, n=63)
40.6 Seconds * -23%
Average of class Gaming
  (16 - 175, n=183, last 2 years)
36.7 Seconds * -11%
Aorus 15X ASF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX
36 Seconds * -9%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
34 Seconds * -3%
Medion Erazer Major X20
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
33 Seconds *
Geekbench 5.5
OpenCL Score
Average of class Gaming
  (5039 - 237138, n=193, last 2 years)
125975 Points +4%
Medion Erazer Major X20
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
121179 Points
Aorus 15X ASF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX
118531 Points -2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
116873 Points -4%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
115659 Points -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (17391 - 129366, n=61)
113893 Points -6%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Arc A730M, Intel Core i7-12700H
20185 Points -83%
Vulkan Score 5.5
Average of class Gaming
  (7995 - 163089, n=123, last 2 years)
71890 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (42883 - 102618, n=32)
70985 Points
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
65743 Points
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Arc A730M, Intel Core i7-12700H
20299 Points
Geekbench 6.0
GPU Vulkan 6.0
Average of class Gaming
  (1827 - 159996, n=45, last 2 years)
48002 Points +392%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (9221 - 108353, n=14)
36988 Points +279%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
19109 Points +96%
Medion Erazer Major X20
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
9751 Points
Aorus 15X ASF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX
9221 Points -5%
GPU OpenCL 6.0
Aorus 15X ASF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX
120609 Points +3%
Medion Erazer Major X20
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
117340 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (30029 - 213472, n=46, last 2 years)
115603 Points -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (99967 - 120609, n=14)
112413 Points -4%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
104147 Points -11%
V-Ray 5 Benchmark
GPU RTX
Average of class Gaming
  (171 - 3824, n=114, last 2 years)
2181 mpaths +29%
Medion Erazer Major X20
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
1687 mpaths
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (171 - 1872, n=36)
1648 mpaths -2%
Aorus 15X ASF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX
1619 mpaths -4%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
1480 mpaths -12%
GPU CUDA
Average of class Gaming
  (120 - 2797, n=116, last 2 years)
1568 mpaths +26%
Medion Erazer Major X20
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
1244 mpaths
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
1214 mpaths -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (120 - 1356, n=36)
1192 mpaths -4%
Aorus 15X ASF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX
1186 mpaths -5%
CPU
Medion Erazer Major X20
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
19198 mpaths
Average of class Gaming
  (3562 - 26944, n=119, last 2 years)
15070 mpaths -22%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (9339 - 20388, n=35)
14381 mpaths -25%
Aorus 15X ASF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX
12060 mpaths -37%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
10360 mpaths -46%
V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10
GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (54 - 1334, n=152, last 2 years)
701 mpaths +15%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
625 mpaths +2%
Medion Erazer Major X20
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
610 mpaths
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (434 - 686, n=46)
606 mpaths -1%
Aorus 15X ASF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX
577 mpaths -5%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
445 mpaths -27%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Arc A730M, Intel Core i7-12700H
88 mpaths -86%
CPU
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
35173 ksamples +21%
Medion Erazer Major X20
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
28958 ksamples
Average of class Gaming
  (5413 - 37629, n=152, last 2 years)
21367 ksamples -26%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (12638 - 35173, n=46)
20879 ksamples -28%
Aorus 15X ASF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX
18429 ksamples -36%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
15575 ksamples -46%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Arc A730M, Intel Core i7-12700H
15474 ksamples -47%

* ... smaller is better

游戏性能

这款笔记本允许在高至最高设置下进行QHD游戏。在使用外部显示器时,更高的分辨率是可能的--可能是降低设置。测试的标题的帧率高于确定的RTX 4070平均水平。dGPU模式可能会在小范围内增加一些游戏的帧率。

Performance Rating - Percent
Medion Erazer Major X20
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
97.1 pt
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
95.2 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
93.5 pt
Aorus 15X ASF
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
92 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
 
87.4 pt
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
79.8 pt
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Arc A730M
41.2 pt
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Medion Erazer Major X20
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
127 (107min) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (18.4 - 216, n=168, last 2 years)
126.9 fps 0%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
121 (104min) fps -5%
Aorus 15X ASF
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
117 (101min) fps -8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (69.8 - 133.7, n=55)
112.2 fps -12%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
96.4 (82min) fps -24%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Arc A730M
49.4 (40min) fps -61%
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Medion Erazer Major X20
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
128 (5.76min, 90.9P1) fps
Aorus 15X ASF
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
117.8 (27.4min, 83.3P1) fps -8%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
114 (5.84min, 76.9P1) fps -11%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
113 (16.1min, 76.9P1) fps -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.1 - 167.7, n=171, last 2 years)
113 fps -12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (48.3 - 140.5, n=55)
110.9 fps -13%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Arc A730M
42.8 (2.99min, 29.4P1) fps -67%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Medion Erazer Major X20
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
121.2 fps
Average of class Gaming
  (19.2 - 201, n=184, last 2 years)
119 fps -2%
Aorus 15X ASF
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
117.5 fps -3%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
114.3 fps -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (41 - 131.9, n=57)
111 fps -8%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
100.3 fps -17%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Arc A730M
49.7 (13min) fps -59%
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Gaming
  (38.9 - 421, n=182, last 2 years)
227 fps +9%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
210 (60.1min, 158P1) fps +1%
Medion Erazer Major X20
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
208 (11.2min, 156.4P1) fps
Aorus 15X ASF
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
201 (45.1min, 149.8P1) fps -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (76.3 - 234, n=58)
196.1 fps -6%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
173.4 (30.1min, 131.1P1) fps -17%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Arc A730M
124.1 (92.7min, 98.3P1) fps -40%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
163.4 (135.4min) fps +3%
Medion Erazer Major X20
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
158.8 (136.2min) fps
Aorus 15X ASF
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
149.4 (125.9min) fps -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (30.8 - 220, n=190, last 2 years)
149.3 fps -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (89.7 - 187.5, n=59)
147.6 fps -7%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
133 (114.4min) fps -16%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Arc A730M
80.4 (58.6min) fps -49%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
128.5 fps +6%
Medion Erazer Major X20
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
120.8 fps
Aorus 15X ASF
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
117.1 fps -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (31.5 - 166.2, n=196, last 2 years)
107.2 fps -11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (58.9 - 144.4, n=61)
104.6 fps -13%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
95 fps -21%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Arc A730M
38.6 fps -68%

为了检查帧率是否在较长时间内基本保持不变,我们在全高清分辨率和最高质量设置下运行游戏 "TheWitcher 3" 约60分钟。游戏角色没有被移动。帧率的下降并没有被记录下来。

Witcher 3 FPS chart

0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
Medion Erazer Major X20 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; FPS: Ø123.2 (117-126)
Aorus 15X ASF i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø115.6 (108-120)
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø91.3 (87-96)
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI R9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø118.2 (110-124)
Medion Erazer Major X10 i7-12700H, A730M: Ø48.4 (46-52)
Witcher 3 测试期间的GPU测量结果(涡轮模式,Optimus)。
Witcher 3 测试期间的GPU测量结果(涡轮模式,Optimus)。
Witcher 3 测试期间的GPU测量(涡轮模式,dGPU)。
Witcher 3 测试期间的GPU测量(涡轮模式,dGPU)。
Witcher 3 测试期间的GPU测量(办公模式,Optimus)。
Witcher 3 测试期间的GPU测量(办公模式,Optimus)。
lowmed.highultraQHD
GTA V (2015) 187.3 187.2 183.8 128 72.6
The Witcher 3 (2015) 545 391.4 242.3 127
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 205 183.3 169.9 158.8
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 220 175.2 121.2 88.4
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 182.3 155.9 120.8
Far Cry 5 (2018) 188 161 153 144 122
Strange Brigade (2018) 490 310 244 208 131.4
F1 22 (2022) 262 264 206 83.9 53.3

排放物 - Erazer笔记本电脑会产生大量的噪音

噪声

X20在负载下会产生很大的噪音:当 "涡轮模式 "激活时,峰值可达57 dB(A)。背景噪音是类似于嘶嘶声的东西。风扇没有发出令人讨厌的背景噪音。通过使用其他两个性能配置,可以实现整体较低的噪音水平--以牺牲计算能力为代价。

在怠速和日常使用中(办公室、互联网)的排放是令人愉快的:风扇以非常低的速度运行,并且经常处于空闲状态--在所有三个性能配置中。

涡轮模式 (dt: Overboost) 平衡模式 (dt: Balanced) 办公室模式 (dt: Balanced)
CPU PL1 (HWInfo) 140 watts 140 watts 140 watts
CPU PL2 (HWInfo) 140 watts 140 watts 140 watts
噪音 (Witcher 3) 50-53 dB(A) 48-51 dB(A) 36-43 dB(A) 以后 32-34 dB(A)
性能 (Witcher 3) 124 fps 118 fps 114-118 fps later 30 fps Lock

Noise Level

Idle
25 / 29 / 31 dB(A)
Load
50 / 57 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 24 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2040.942.245.443.841.22541.137.842.736.938.33147.647.251.341.650.14032.234.533.429.233.85040.339.940.338.539.66332.127.830.523.938.38025.820.319.118.9311002620.320.214.629.312530.421.218.415.833.916030.120.418.816.533.620031.62521.519.636.525033.122.919.616.236.431533.520.117.412.937.640035.223.218.210.940.250037.822.719.612.142.163038.222.219.413.844.580038.220.917.91344.1100038.919.617.311.344.7125038.61916.612.244.6160036.617.515.611.443.4200036.417.415.611.243.225003820.515.81244.5315038.91614.811.845.2400040.615.415.212.247.1500039.316.11512.948.3630035.114.915.812.545.1800029.114.414.512.439.41000027.816.314.712.438.81250024.214.813.712.434.51600023.115.614.512.129.9SPL49.730.828.624.656.6N7.11.41.10.611.4median 35.2median 19.6median 16.6median 12.4median 42.1Delta5.232.114.6hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseMedion Erazer Major X20
Medion Erazer Major X20
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Aorus 15X ASF
i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
R9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Noise
-5%
7%
5%
off / environment *
24
25
-4%
26
-8%
25
-4%
Idle Minimum *
25
28
-12%
28
-12%
26
-4%
Idle Average *
29
29
-0%
28
3%
29
-0%
Idle Maximum *
31
36
-16%
28
10%
30
3%
Load Average *
50
50
-0%
38.5
23%
46
8%
Witcher 3 ultra *
53
54
-2%
46
13%
Load Maximum *
57
58
-2%
43.9
23%
47
18%

* ... smaller is better

温度

在日常使用中(办公室、互联网),笔记本温度保持在绿色范围内。笔记本在负载下明显发热(压力测试,Witcher 3 测试),但不会过度。CPU的温度没有什么可担心的。

Max. Load
 46 °C46 °C45 °C 
 44 °C44 °C34 °C 
 28 °C30 °C30 °C 
Maximum: 46 °C
Average: 38.6 °C
46 °C49 °C46 °C
40 °C46 °C36 °C
24 °C24 °C33 °C
Maximum: 49 °C
Average: 38.2 °C
Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 37 °C / 99 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31 °C / 87.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-2.1 °C / -3.8 F).
Medion Erazer Major X20
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Aorus 15X ASF
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Heat
16%
3%
12%
Maximum Upper Side *
46
42
9%
49.5
-8%
42
9%
Maximum Bottom *
49
51
-4%
47.5
3%
41
16%
Idle Upper Side *
37
27
27%
33.4
10%
33
11%
Idle Bottom *
38
26
32%
35
8%
34
11%

* ... smaller is better

压力测试

压力测试(Prime95和Furmark连续运行)代表了测试系统在全负荷下稳定性的极端情况。CPU以高时钟频率开始测试(P:4 GHz,E:3.3 GHz),而GPU以1.5至2 GHz的速度启动。在最初的5分钟内,CPU时钟逐渐下降到2至2.4 GHz(P核)和1.9至2.1 GHz(E核)。同时,GPU时钟增加到2.3至2.4GHz。

压力测试
压力测试
压力测试
压力测试
压力测试
压力测试
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3

发言人

立体声扬声器产生非常体面的声音,但可以使用更多的低音。建议使用耳机或外部扬声器以获得更好的音质。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2043.845.12536.942.53141.647.24029.236.65038.541.86323.936.88018.934.610014.64312515.853.516016.558.320019.662.425016.26831512.967.540010.970.750012.177.263013.878.78001375.4100011.376.4125012.272.9160011.473.1200011.270.725001269.3315011.872.9400012.272.9500012.975630012.573.5800012.469.81000012.468.31250012.461.41600012.160.6SPL24.685.6N0.670.5median 12.4median 70.7Delta14.539.138.736.536.54147.529.629.939.841.126.527.31820.714.617.214.319.717.127.124.243.619.660.413.359.411.259.611.362.111.666.2116810.875.510.975.41171.911.171.612.366.812.562.612.465.213.168.513.769.913.272.313.467.712.563.812.26324.982.50.653median 12.5median 65.21.67.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMedion Erazer Major X20Aorus 15X ASF
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Medion Erazer Major X20 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Aorus 15X ASF audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.3% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 69% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能源管理 - Medion X20的运行时间很短

消耗功率

Medion笔记本在能源消耗方面没有显示任何异常。对于所安装的硬件来说,这些比率处于正常水平。Witcher 3 测试和压力测试以相对稳定的耗电率运行。因此,电源(330瓦)的大小是足够的。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 /  Watt
Idledarkmidlight 12 / 16 / 26 Watt
Load midlight 115 / 319 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Medion Erazer Major X20
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Aorus 15X ASF
i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
R9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
 
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
7%
-46%
-6%
9%
-1%
Idle Minimum *
12
11
8%
31.6
-163%
15
-25%
12.1 ?(4.3 - 31, n=50)
-1%
Idle Average *
16
16
-0%
33.3
-108%
20
-25%
Idle Maximum *
26
24
8%
38.6
-48%
29
-12%
23.9 ?(9 - 55.4, n=50)
8%
Load Average *
115
104
10%
149
-30%
121
-5%
Witcher 3 ultra *
191.6
185.4
3%
149.6
22%
179.8
6%
Load Maximum *
319
272
15%
160
50%
246
23%

* ... smaller is better

Energieaufnahme Witcher 3 / Stresstest

0153045607590105120135150165180195210225240255Tooltip
Medion Erazer Major X20; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø191.6 (183.8-199.7)
Medion Erazer Major X20; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø242 (226-265)
Medion Erazer Major X20; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø16.3 (11.7-26.8)

Power consumption with an external monitor

0153045607590105120135150165180195210Tooltip
Medion Erazer Major X20; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø169.5 (164.9-199.4)
Medion Erazer Major X20; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø186.6 (183.3-188.4)
Medion Erazer Major X20; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø211 (207-216)
Medion Erazer Major X20; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø184.9 (177.1-196.5)
Medion Erazer Major X20; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø20.8 (19.4-26.8)

电池寿命

在WLAN测试中,这台16英寸笔记本的运行时间分别为3:52小时和4:12小时(使用脚本加载网站)和视频测试(短片Big Buck Bunny,H.264编码,FHD,循环进行)。在这两项测试中,笔记本的节能功能被停用,显示亮度被设置为150cd/m²左右。在视频测试中,无线电模块也被停用了。

总体上低于平均水平的运行时间是由于游戏笔记本的电池容量低(62.3Wh)。如果使用前代产品的80Wh电池,可能会有更多的时间。 前代产品的80瓦特电池可以实现更多。.

该电池的容量为62.3Wh。
该电池的容量为62.3Wh。
Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
5h 45min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 112)
3h 52min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
4h 12min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 36min
Medion Erazer Major X20
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 62.3 Wh
Aorus 15X ASF
i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 99 Wh
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 80 Wh
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
R9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
80%
26%
-21%
44%
Reader / Idle
345
679
97%
404
17%
H.264
252
472
87%
352
40%
166
-34%
WiFi v1.3
232
489
111%
274
18%
255
10%
Load
96
118
23%
125
30%
58
-40%
Witcher 3 ultra
64

Pros

+ 16:10格式的QHD+屏幕
+ 良好的色彩表现
+ G-Sync和Advanced Optimus
+ 纤细的显示框架
+ 高系统性能
+ 可交换/扩展的内存
+ 2个PCIe 4固态硬盘,每个1TB
+ 雷电4
+ 机械键盘
+ 液态金属散热膏

Cons

- RTX 4070由于有8GB的VRAM,所以只能算是中产阶级
- 负载下声音大
- 没有电力传输
- 电池寿命差

判决:大量的设备

Medion Erazer Major X20,由Medion提供。
Medion Erazer Major X20,由Medion提供。

这款强大的笔记本能够实现QHD+游戏,但在其他方面也很出色。A 酷睿i9-13900HX和一个 GeForce RTX 4070在持续的高时钟速率下运行,两个1TB的固态硬盘确保短的加载时间和足够的存储空间。噪声和热量发展在高范围内,是这种笔记本级别的典型。

在Erazer Major X20中,Medion展示了一个装备精良的中端游戏笔记本,没有任何严重的弱点。

前一个型号的chiclet键盘已经让位给机械模型(Cherry MX开关,RGB独立按键照明)--这是一个重大的改进。不熟悉这种键盘的用户将发现一种新的打字体验。

哑光的16英寸屏幕(QHD+,IPS,240赫兹,G-Sync,sRGB)采用适合工作的16:10格式,总体上给人以良好的印象。一个Thunderbolt 4端口确保了扩展选项(外部GPU、扩展坞解决方案、显示器),但不支持Power Delivery。电池运行时间也不令人印象深刻。

这款 Aorus 15X ASF是一个替代品,其运行时间明显更好。它提供与X20相同的图形性能,但CPU功率较小。

价格和可用性

Medion Erazer Major X20的审查配置在Medion的网上商店上市,价格略低于2,500欧元,但目前已售罄。目前,该机型在德国以外地区的供应似乎有限。

Medion Erazer Major X20 - 04/20/2023 v7 (old)
Sascha Mölck

Chassis
83 / 98 → 85%
Keyboard
90%
Pointing Device
86%
Connectivity
68 / 80 → 85%
Weight
61 / 10-66 → 90%
Battery
57 / 95 → 59%
Display
90%
Games Performance
100%
Application Performance
96%
Temperature
85 / 95 → 90%
Noise
68 / 90 → 75%
Audio
85%
Camera
47 / 85 → 55%
Average
78%
89%
Gaming - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > Medion Erazer Major X20回顾:配备RTX 4070和坚实硬件的游戏笔记本
Sascha Mölck, 2023-04-26 (Update: 2023-04-26)