Notebookcheck Logo

小米 Mix Fold 3 评测：有外观缺陷的可折叠高端智能手机

几乎完美

小米 Mix Fold 3 搭载了骁龙 8 代 2、最高 16GB 内存和 6 倍摄像头，显然属于高端智能手机级别，但价格还是相对较高。官方称，这款 8.03 英寸 AMOLED 可折叠手机是为中国市场预留的，这也影响了手机的覆盖范围。我们的评测阐明了进口购买是否值得。
5G Android Foldable Smartphone Touchscreen
小米混合折叠 3

小米推出了一款新的可折叠手机 Mix Fold 3，凭借其强大的功能，如骁龙 8 代 2、6 个摄像头和高达 1 TB 的存储空间。官方称，制造商只在中国提供 Mix Fold 3。另一方面，也可以通过进口商购买。

可折叠的顶级手机，如谷歌 Pixel Fold和 三星Galaxy Z Fold5Mix Fold 3 不仅在性能上脱颖而出，而且起价也极具竞争力。在配备 256 GB 内存的最小型号中，Mix Fold 3 的价格约为 1450 美元，因此与Galaxy Z Fold5 的价格差不多。相比之下，谷歌 Pixel Fold的售价在评测时还不到 1800 美元。

Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 (Mix Fold Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 8 x 2 - 3.2 GHz, Cortex-X3 / A715 / A710 / A510 (Kryo)
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 740
Memory
16 GB 
, LPDDR5x
Display
8.03 inch 10.15:9, 2160 x 1916 pixel 360 PPI, capacitive, AMOLED, LTPO display, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HLG; Cover display: 6.56 inches AMOLED, 2520 x 1080 Pixel, 120 Hz, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 512 GB 
, 478 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Fingerprint, Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Proximity, Compass, Color spectrum, Barometer, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API Level 3; GNSS: GPS (L1+L5), Glonass (G1), BeiDou (B1I+B1c+B2a), Galileo (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5)
Networking
Wi-Fi 7 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (Band 2, 3, 5), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19), 4G (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42), 5G (Band 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 5.3 x 161.2 x 143.3
Battery
4800 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 13
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (Sony IMX800, f/1.8, 23mm, PDAF, OIS) + 10 MP Telefoto (Samsung S5K3K1, 3.2x optical zoom, f/2.0, 75mm) + 10 MP Telefoto (Samsung S5K3K1, 5x optical zoom, f/2.9, 120mm) + 12 MP Ultrawide (Omnivision OV13B10, f/2.2, 120°, AF); videos up to 8K@24fp
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix (Omnivision OV20B, f/2.3, 23mm)
Additional features
Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: virtual, 67W charger, USB cable, Protective case, Quick start guide, MIUI 14.1, 12 Months Warranty, 50W Wireless charging, fanless
Weight
259 g, Power Supply: 95 g
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
87.3 %
v7 (old)
11 / 2023
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740		259 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash8.03"2160x1916
84.7 %
v7 (old)
08 / 2023
Google Pixel Fold
Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7		283 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash7.60"2208x1840
87.2 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2023
Honor Magic Vs
SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730		261 g512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash7.90"2272x1984
86.3 %
v7 (old)
06 / 2023
Huawei Mate X3
SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730		239 g512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash7.85"2496x2224
89.1 %
v7 (old)
08 / 2023
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740		253 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash7.60"2176x1812
86.3 %
v7 (old)
12 / 2022
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730		262 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash8.02"2160x1914

小米 Mix Fold 3 有黑色、黑碳色和金色三个版本，每个版本都有不同的后盖设计。金色 版和黑色 版都采用了磨砂玻璃后盖，金色版的纹理光滑，而黑色 版的手感则类似皮革。在第三种颜色的黑碳版本中，后盖由陶瓷和芳纶纤维混合制成，具有碳纤维的外观，据说特别耐用。不过，任何颜色版本都没有 IP 认证。

Mix Fold 3 的四周是铝制边框，按键和实体铰链也是由相同的材料制成。6.56 英寸 AMOLED 外显示屏由大猩猩玻璃 Victus 2 覆盖，而 8.03 英寸 AMOLED 内显示屏则贴有保护膜。折痕清晰可见，引人注目。

与外壳的其他部分一样，铝制边框质量很高，为折叠式手机提供了良好的稳定性。在展开时，铰链区域几乎没有晃动，强力施压也不足以让 Mix Fold 3 向后弯曲。铰链在展开位置保持稳定，不会晃动。根据小米的说法，它的设计可以持续折叠 500,000 次。只有环绕可折叠面板的相当宽的哑光塑料边框破坏了优雅的整体印象。

展开后，小米 Mix Fold 3 的尺寸为 161.2 x 143.3 x 5.3 毫米，是目前最薄的可折叠手机之一。华为 Mate X3。折叠后，它的尺寸为 161.2 x 73.5 x 11 毫米，因此几乎不比 iPhone 15 Pro Max 厚。 Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max的厚度。259 克的重量也不会让人感觉太重。

小米混合折叠 3
小米混合折叠 3
小米混合折叠 3
小米混合折叠 3
小米混合折叠 3
小米混合折叠 3
小米混合折叠 3
小米混合折叠 3
小米混合折叠 3
小米混合折叠 3
小米混合折叠 3
小米混合折叠 3
小米混合折叠 3

尺寸比较

❌
161.6 mm 144.7 mm 5.4 mm 262 g161.2 mm 143.3 mm 5.3 mm 259 g160.3 mm 141.5 mm 6.1 mm 261 g158.7 mm 139.7 mm 6.05 mm 283 g156.9 mm 141.5 mm 5.3 mm 239 g154.9 mm 129.9 mm 6.1 mm 253 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

Size comparison (folded)

❌
161.2 mm 73.5 mm 10.96 mm 259 g154.9 mm 67.1 mm 13.4 mm 253 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

设备 - 配备 USB 3.2 Gen.1 和红外爆破器的小米 Mix Fold 3

小米提供三种配置的 Mix Fold 3。最小的机型配备 12GB LPDDR5x 内存和 256GB UFS 4.0 存储空间，售价约为 1450 美元。中间版本提供 12 GB 内存和 512 GB 存储空间，售价约为 1700 美元。Mix Fold 3 的最大版本提供 16 GB 内存和 1 TB 存储空间，售价约为 1800 美元。由于没有 microSD 插槽，存储空间无法扩展。

小米可折叠手机有一个支持 OTG 的 USB-C 端口，可按照 USB 3.1 Gen.1 标准工作，即达到 USB 3.0 的速度。在使用我们的外置三星 980 Pro M2 固态硬盘进行拷贝测试时，USB 端口的数据吞吐量达到了 295.5 MB/s。

除了立体声扬声器、双 SIM 卡插槽和集成在电源按钮上的指纹传感器外，其他功能还包括一个红外线发射器，可用于远程控制智能电视等。

左侧，折叠：无端口
左侧，折叠：无端口
右侧，折叠式：带指纹传感器的电源按钮、音量摇杆
右侧，折叠式：带指纹传感器的电源按钮、音量摇杆
顶部，折叠式：扬声器、双 SIM 卡插槽、红外热像仪、麦克风
顶部，折叠式：扬声器、双 SIM 卡插槽、红外热像仪、麦克风
底部，折叠式：扬声器、USB-C 3.2 Gen.2、麦克风
底部，折叠式：扬声器、USB-C 3.2 Gen.2、麦克风

软件 - MIUI 14.1，更新供应不明确

Mix Fold 3 使用基于Android 13 的 MIUI 14.1。在我们从TradingShenzhen 进口的中文手机上，谷歌框架和相关服务已在后台运行。谷歌框架和相关服务已在后台运行，因此如果需要，可以轻松安装谷歌 Play 商店。例如，通过预装的小米应用商店GetApps 就可以实现这一功能。Mix Fold 3 还通过了 DRM 认证（Widevine L1），这意味着它支持高清流媒体播放。

除了简体中文、繁体中文、藏语和乌语外，Mix Fold 3 的系统语言只有英语。许多预装的应用程序都是中文的，但如果不需要，都可以卸载。Android 13 和 MIUI 14.1 刚安装好时，在我们的 512 GB 测试设备上占用了约 34 GB 的空间。

在 11 月初进行评测时，Android 上一次安全更新是从 9 月 1 日开始的，因此不再是完全最新的。小米尚未提供任何关于可折叠手机的安全更新和操作系统升级将持续多久的信息。

小米混合折叠 3
小米混合折叠 3
小米混合折叠 3
小米混合折叠 3
小米混合折叠 3
小米混合折叠 3

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - WiFi 7 和频率差距

小米 MIX Fold 3 的移动通信频率覆盖范围很广。与竞争对手如三星Galaxy Z Fold5等竞争对手相比，它的频率覆盖范围并不算太广。我们的测试设备缺少在欧洲非常重要的 LTE 频段 20。尽管存在这一限制，但在城市地区不太可能出现接收问题。不过，农村地区的情况可能完全不同。

在短距离内，Mix Fold 3 可通过蓝牙 5.3、NFC 和 WiFi 7 进行通信，因此比其前代产品混合折叠 2的定位更胜一筹。与华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 参考路由器连接后，它在 6 GHz 频段上的 WiFi 传输速率超过 1800 MBit/s。在 5 GHz 网络上，传输速率接近 1000 MBit/s。

Networking
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
iperf3 receive AXE11000
911 (min: 867) MBit/s ∼69%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
994 (min: 919) MBit/s ∼68%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1867 (min: 1829) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1645 (min: 811) MBit/s ∼98%
Google Pixel Fold
iperf3 receive AXE11000
920 (min: 888) MBit/s ∼70%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
950 (min: 481) MBit/s ∼65%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1714 (min: 856) MBit/s ∼92%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1684 (min: 1447) MBit/s ∼100%
Honor Magic Vs
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1315 (min: 1162) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1467 (min: 1101) MBit/s ∼100%
Huawei Mate X3
iperf3 receive AXE11000
928 (min: 851) MBit/s ∼71%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
934 (min: 888) MBit/s ∼64%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
iperf3 receive AXE11000
886 (min: 764) MBit/s ∼67%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
924 (min: 456) MBit/s ∼63%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1631 (min: 1075) MBit/s ∼87%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1601 (min: 1511) MBit/s ∼95%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
iperf3 receive AXE11000
808 (min: 737) MBit/s ∼61%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
915 (min: 858) MBit/s ∼62%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 receive AXE11000
711 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
725 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼49%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1443 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼77%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1387 (min: 668) MBit/s ∼82%
095190285380475570665760855950104511401235133014251520161517101805Tooltip
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1867 (1829-1894)
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1631 (1075-1812)
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1616 (811-1673)
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1598 (1511-1667)
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø910 (867-927)
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø884 (764-954)
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø994 (919-1015)
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø909 (456-950)
室内 GPS 信号
室内 GPS 信号
户外 GPS 信号
户外 GPS 信号

Mix Fold 3 可通过 GPS（L1、L5）、Glonass（G1）、北斗（B1、B1c、B2a）、伽利略（E1、E5a）、QZSS（L1、L5）和 NavIC（L5）卫星系统精确定位。在室内，定位需要几秒钟，但显示精度可达 3 米。而在室外，定位几乎是瞬间完成，而且同样精确。

我们带着 Mix Fold 3 散步，对它的实际跟踪能力进行了测试。然而，它在这方面的表现并不突出。与 Garmin Venu 2 健身智能手表相比，这款可折叠手表的路线追踪精度要低得多，偶尔还会出现较大的异常值。

GPS 测试：总结
GPS 测试：总结
GPS 测试：公园中的湖泊
GPS 测试：公园中的湖泊
GPS 测试：街道交叉口
GPS 测试：街道交叉口

电话和语音质量

小米 Mix Fold 3 可容纳 2 张 nano SIM 卡。支持 VoLTE 和 Wi-Fi 通话，但不支持 eSIM。

在我们的测试中，Mix Fold 3 的语音质量不错。即使在嘈杂的环境中，通话伙伴也能清楚地听到对方的声音，因为背景噪音被有效地过滤掉了。不过，当扬声器启动时，会有轻微的回声，麦克风的通话距离也不是很长。

摄像头 - 配备索尼 IMX800 的四摄像头

与内置相机自拍
与内置相机自拍
前置摄像头自拍
前置摄像头自拍

尽管有徕卡品牌，但我们并不完全信服混合折叠 2的摄像头设置并不完全令我们信服，因为新增镜头的成像性能还有很大的提升空间。不过，对于后续机型，小米确实做了更多努力，不仅集成了更多摄像头，还提升了质量。首先是自拍摄像头。

与 Mix Fold 2 不同的是，现在在内侧显示屏上有一个配备 Omnivision OV20B 的自拍摄像头，摄像头总数增加到 6 个。外侧显示屏上也使用了同样的摄像头，虽然对比度不高，但拍摄的人像照片效果不错。

可折叠手机的背面不再是三摄像头，而是四摄像头设置，配备两个长焦镜头，这是与徕卡合作开发的。主传感器为索尼 IMX800（Mix Fold 2：IMX766），5400 万像素，其中 5000 万像素得到有效利用。同样的传感器安装在小米 13和它的徕卡 Vario-Summicron 1:18-2.9/ 15-115 ASPH的昵称在可折叠手机的背面永垂不朽。

得益于与徕卡的合作，徕卡活力 （默认）和徕卡真实两种图像模式与众多照片设置选项一起再次登场，这两种模式的色彩校准略有不同。在白天，配备 5000 万像素主传感器的 Mix Fold 3 可拍摄出质量上乘的照片，图像清晰度高、色彩自然、动态范围大，令人印象深刻。在光线不足的条件下，Mix Fold 3 的传感器也能捕捉到大量细节。

与主摄像头相比，1200 万像素超广角摄像头（Omnivision OV13B10）只能提供标准的效果，实际上远低于你对这个价位的预期。照片效果不错，但总体来说还是略显苍白。

两款长焦相机又变得有趣起来，它们都使用三星 S5K3K1 作为图像传感器。1000 万像素的摄像头具有 3.2 倍光学放大功能，也可用作人像拍摄的标准传感器。它的 1200 万像素同事具有 5 倍光学变焦。数码放大倍数可达 50 倍。这两款长焦相机都能拍摄出高对比度和清晰的照片，整体成像效果非常出色。不过，如果使用数码变焦，图像质量会迅速下降，并出现明显的噪点。

Mix Fold 3 可录制每秒高达 60 帧的 4K 视频和每秒 24 帧的 8K 视频。后一种分辨率的视频最长可录制 6 分钟。如果激活 HDR，则最多可以 30 FPS 或 24 FPS 的速度录制 4K 视频。

使用主摄像头拍照
使用主摄像头拍照
使用主摄像头拍照
使用主摄像头拍照
使用主摄像头拍照
使用主摄像头拍照

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight photo 1Daylight photo 2Ultra wide angle5x zoomLow light

在实验室的最佳照明条件下，小米 Mix Fold 3 能够非常精确地捕捉 Colorchecker 色彩图，并且没有显示任何异常（Delta-E < 12）。除外围区域外，测试图的捕捉非常清晰，在 1 勒克斯的残余光线下仍可识别，但也相当模糊。

ColorChecker
6.1 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
6 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
9 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
2 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Mix Fold 3: 6.03 ∆E min: 1.98 - max: 11.53 ∆E
ColorChecker
26.6 ∆E
42.4 ∆E
33 ∆E
31.4 ∆E
36.4 ∆E
49.4 ∆E
41.7 ∆E
27.7 ∆E
30.3 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
49.1 ∆E
51.9 ∆E
24.9 ∆E
38 ∆E
26 ∆E
50.7 ∆E
23.4 ∆E
37.5 ∆E
51.3 ∆E
50.7 ∆E
42.9 ∆E
31.9 ∆E
22.6 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Mix Fold 3: 35.71 ∆E min: 13.11 - max: 51.94 ∆E

配件和保修 - Mix Fold 3 功能丰富

提供 67 瓦的电源装置。
提供 67 瓦的电源装置。

小米 Mix Fold 3 随附一个 67 瓦电源适配器（最高 20V/3.25A，插头类型 A）、一条 USB 数据线（类型 A 至 C）、一个 SIM 卡工具、一个保护套和一份快速入门指南。如果您在TradingShenzhen 购买这款智能手机，还将获赠一个电源适配器（C 型插头）。

小米 Mix Fold 3 提供 12 个月的 保修.

输入设备和操作：120 Hz 显示屏和多任务处理

使用 MIUI 14.1 的浮动窗口功能进行多任务处理。
使用 MIUI 14.1 的浮动窗口功能进行多任务处理。

Mix Fold 3 的 AMOLED 显示屏对输入的反应非常迅速和精确。得益于 120 Hz 的最高刷新率，显示内容非常流畅。我们对集成在电源按钮上的指纹传感器也赞不绝口，在测试中，我们总是能用它可靠地登录，而且几乎是即时登录。自拍摄像头的 2D 人脸扫描也可用于生物识别身份验证。

在两个屏幕之间切换非常直观。一次只能激活一个屏幕。如果你稍微打开铰链，6.56 英寸的外屏就会关闭，而 8.03 英寸的内屏就会打开。相反，关闭铰链时，只有外屏处于活动状态。MIUI 会自动调整屏幕显示内容。

Mix Fold 3 的超大内屏非常适合多任务处理。MIUI 14.1 的浮动窗口正是为此而设计的。有了这项功能，应用程序会显示在独立的窗口中，可以根据需要调整大小并在主屏幕上移动。并非所有应用程序都支持浮动窗口。但用户很快就会发现哪些应用程序支持浮动窗口。所有兼容的应用程序都可以通过屏幕左侧边缘的可扩展侧边栏直接调用。浮动窗口在外侧显示屏上不可用。

Mix Fold 3 预装了三种键盘：百度 IME 键盘、iFlytek IME 键盘和搜狗键盘，这三种键盘针对中国用户进行了优化。对于所有其他用户，建议安装一个替代键盘，如谷歌 Play 商店中的谷歌 Gboard，因为其他输入方式需要很多适应时间。

内屏键盘，纵向模式（Google Gboard）
内屏键盘，纵向模式（Google Gboard）
内侧显示屏上的键盘，横向模式（Google Gboard）
内侧显示屏上的键盘，横向模式（Google Gboard）
外屏键盘，纵向模式（Google Gboard）
外屏键盘，纵向模式（Google Gboard）
外侧显示屏上的键盘，横向模式（Google Gboard）
外侧显示屏上的键盘，横向模式（Google Gboard）

显示屏 - HDR 模式下高达 2300 尼特

外部显示屏的子像素网格
外部显示屏的子像素网格
内部显示屏的子像素网格
内部显示屏的子像素网格

小米 Mix Fold 3 的可折叠内屏尺寸为 8.03 英寸，采用分辨率为 2160 x 1916 的 AMOLED 面板，对应 10.15:9 的非同寻常的长宽比和 360 PPI 的像素密度。

XXL 显示屏的另一个特殊功能是其 LTPO 功能。这可以将刷新率从 120 Hz 降低到 1 Hz。小米可折叠手机的 21:9 外屏尺寸为 6.56 英寸，分辨率为 2520 x 1080，刷新率也是 120 Hz。不过，与内屏不同的是，它不支持 LTPO。

在亮度方面，两块显示屏相差不大，手动调节亮度时都能达到四位数的亮度值。不过，内屏的亮度更高一些，在明暗区域均匀分布（APL18）和环境光传感器启动的情况下，内屏的峰值可达 1308 cd/m²（外屏为 1065 cd/m²）。

在显示 HDR 内容时，内部显示屏的亮度甚至会增加到 2301 cd/m²，因此与制造商标称的 2600 nits 比较接近。相反，当亮度传感器关闭时，我们只能从折叠屏中获得最高 603 cd/m² 的亮度。在最低亮度设置下，我们测得的亮度为 2.59 cd/m²。

Mix Fold 3 使用脉宽调制来控制亮度，因此也会出现 PWM 闪烁。虽然两个屏幕都显示出相当不稳定的振幅曲线，但内部显示屏的平均闪烁频率高达 367 Hz，对于敏感的用户来说应该不会有任何问题。

1316
cd/m²		1304
cd/m²		1315
cd/m²
1309
cd/m²		1307
cd/m²		1297
cd/m²
1331
cd/m²		1308
cd/m²		1283
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1331 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1307.8 cd/m² Minimum: 2.59 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 1307 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.24
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
AMOLED, 2160x1916, 8"		Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
AMOLED, 2520x1080, 6.6"		Google Pixel Fold
OLED, 2208x1840, 7.6"		Honor Magic Vs
OLED, 2272x1984, 7.9"		Huawei Mate X3
OLED, 2496x2224, 7.9"		Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Dynamic AMOLED, 2176x1812, 7.6"		Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
OLED, 2160x1914, 8"
Screen
-7%
-36%
-103%
-27%
-81%
-46%
Brightness middle
1307
1020
-22%
993
-24%
803
-39%
948
-27%
1104
-16%
1015
-22%
Brightness
1308
1065
-19%
997
-24%
809
-38%
969
-26%
1107
-15%
1022
-22%
Brightness Distribution
96
84
-12%
94
-2%
97
1%
94
-2%
97
1%
98
2%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1
0.9
10%
1.4
-40%
2.27
-127%
1.4
-40%
3.1
-210%
1.6
-60%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
1.7
2
-18%
3.2
-88%
5.99
-252%
2.6
-53%
4.2
-147%
3.4
-100%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.5
1.2
20%
2.1
-40%
3.9
-160%
1.7
-13%
3
-100%
2.6
-73%
Gamma
2.24 98%
2.26 97%
2.24 98%
2.25 98%
2.15 102%
2.01 109%
2.22 99%
CCT
6313 103%
6436 101%
6796 96%
6234 104%
6539 99%
6594 99%
6506 100%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 367 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 367 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 367 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8706 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最低显示亮度
Min.
25% 显示屏亮度
25%
50% 显示亮度
50%
75% 显示亮度
75%
最大显示亮度
100%

在固定变焦水平和不同亮度设置下进行系列测量（可折叠显示屏）

最低显示亮度
Min.
25% 显示屏亮度
25%
50% 显示亮度
50%
75% 显示亮度
75%
最大显示亮度
100%

在固定变焦级别和不同亮度设置下进行系列测量（外部显示屏）

如果选择使用 sRGB 色彩空间的Original Color Pro色彩配置文件，色彩表现会非常准确。在默认的Vivid 设置中，显示效果稍冷，但使用的 DCI-P3 色彩空间要大得多。

色彩保真度（原色专业版色彩方案、暖白平衡、目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩保真度（原色专业版色彩方案、暖白平衡、目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（原色专业色彩方案，暖白平衡，目标色彩空间：sRGB
色彩空间（原色专业色彩方案，暖白平衡，目标色彩空间：sRGB
灰度（原色专业色彩方案，暖白平衡，目标色彩空间：sRGB
灰度（原色专业色彩方案，暖白平衡，目标色彩空间：sRGB
色彩饱和度（原色专业色彩方案、暖白平衡、目标色彩空间：sRGB
色彩饱和度（原色专业色彩方案、暖白平衡、目标色彩空间：sRGB

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
1.55 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.7815 ms rise
↘ 0.7715 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
3.32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.384 ms rise
↘ 1.937 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

小米 MIX Fold 3 凭借其明亮的显示屏，在户外表现非常出色。即使在阳光明媚的日子里，可视角度稳定的屏幕上的内容也能清晰可见。

内部显示屏（自动亮度）
内部显示屏（自动亮度）
内部显示屏（最大亮度）
内部显示屏（最大亮度）
外部显示屏（自动亮度）
外部显示屏（自动亮度）
外部显示屏（最大亮度）
外部显示屏（最大亮度）
内部显示屏的视角稳定性
内部显示屏的视角稳定性
外部显示屏的视角稳定性
外部显示屏的视角稳定性

性能 - 骁龙 8 代 2 的高端性能

使用骁龙 8 代 2、小米 Mix Fold 3 拥有目前移动设备上最强大的处理器之一。这款高端 SoC 至少拥有 12 GB LPDDR5x 内存。这意味着，Mix Fold 3 不仅在基准测试中表现出色，而且在日常生活中的各种场景下都有非常出色的表现。

Geekbench 5.5 | Geekbench 6.3 | Antutu v9 | PCMark for Android | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | AImark
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1526 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (1048 - 1574, n=20)
1455 Points -5%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1324 Points -13%
Huawei Mate X3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1292 Points -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=175, last 2 years)
1040 Points -32%
Honor Magic Vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
897 Points -41%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
5005 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (4192 - 5243, n=20)
4918 Points -2%
Huawei Mate X3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
4320 Points -14%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
4237 Points -15%
Honor Magic Vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
3782 Points -24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 8816, n=175, last 2 years)
3474 Points -31%
Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
2084 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
1999 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (1432 - 2104, n=17)
1926 Points -8%
Huawei Mate X3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1806 Points -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 3479, n=173, last 2 years)
1494 Points -28%
Google Pixel Fold
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
1480 Points -29%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
5525 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
5384 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (4255 - 5765, n=17)
5226 Points -5%
Huawei Mate X3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
4656 Points -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 10401, n=173, last 2 years)
4189 Points -24%
Google Pixel Fold
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
3533 Points -36%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1308059 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (1111522 - 1322448, n=17)
1259049 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
1135554 Points -13%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1057225 Points -19%
Huawei Mate X3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
985150 Points -25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (99654 - 2056989, n=104, last 2 years)
810694 Points -38%
Honor Magic Vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
782013 Points -40%
Google Pixel Fold
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
619727 Points -53%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
16311 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (11562 - 20394, n=24)
15817 Points 0%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
15761 Points
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
13195 Points -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 27169, n=197, last 2 years)
13174 Points -16%
Huawei Mate X3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
12606 Points -20%
Google Pixel Fold
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
11617 Points -26%
Honor Magic Vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
11296 Points -28%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
9730 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
9337 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (7354 - 9730, n=22)
8794 Points -10%
Huawei Mate X3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
7236 Points -26%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
7003 Points -28%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 12993, n=158, last 2 years)
6499 Points -33%
Google Pixel Fold
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
5704 Points -41%
Honor Magic Vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
5642 Points -42%
System
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
14032 Points +2%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
13749 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (10786 - 15148, n=22)
13173 Points -4%
Huawei Mate X3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
12326 Points -10%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
11275 Points -18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 17953, n=158, last 2 years)
10346 Points -25%
Honor Magic Vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
8750 Points -36%
Google Pixel Fold
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
8318 Points -40%
Memory
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
10136 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (6601 - 10834, n=22)
9479 Points -6%
Huawei Mate X3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
8846 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
8467 Points -16%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
7342 Points -28%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 18911, n=158, last 2 years)
7058 Points -30%
Google Pixel Fold
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
4556 Points -55%
Honor Magic Vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
3871 Points -62%
Graphics
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
32002 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
31928 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (22837 - 32334, n=22)
27375 Points -14%
Honor Magic Vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
23174 Points -28%
Huawei Mate X3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
20974 Points -34%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
18021 Points -44%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=158, last 2 years)
17998 Points -44%
Google Pixel Fold
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
16243 Points -49%
Web
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
2032 Points +1%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
2009 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (1077 - 2044, n=22)
1777 Points -12%
Google Pixel Fold
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
1720 Points -14%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1612 Points -20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2363, n=158, last 2 years)
1578 Points -21%
Honor Magic Vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1291 Points -36%
Huawei Mate X3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1198 Points -40%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
73962 Points +364%
Google Pixel Fold
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
37656 Points +136%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 81594, n=150, last 2 years)
17814 Points +12%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
15942 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (11338 - 16880, n=21)
15142 Points -5%
Honor Magic Vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
8502 Points -47%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
1267 Points -92%
AImark - Score v3.x
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (941 - 173234, n=18)
29790 Points +2385%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=143, last 2 years)
25319 Points +2012%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1201 Points 0%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1199 Points
Honor Magic Vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1001 Points -17%
Google Pixel Fold
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
496 Points -59%

在 Mix Fold 3 中，Adreno 740 Adreno 740负责图形处理，确保折叠手机在 GPU 基准测试中名列前茅。我们的候选测试机和 三星Galaxy Z Fold5在大多数情况下不相上下，而 Honor Magic Vs和 华为 Mate X3和 小米混合折叠 2保持着一定的距离。谷歌 谷歌 Pixel Fold无法与强劲的竞争对手匹敌，通常会远远落在后面。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3892 Points +2%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3800 Points
Huawei Mate X3
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2757 Points -27%
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2735 Points -28%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2726 Points -28%
Google Pixel Fold
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1711 Points -55%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3928 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3901 Points -1%
Huawei Mate X3
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2821 Points -28%
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2799 Points -29%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2795 Points -29%
Google Pixel Fold
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1760 Points -55%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
14671 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
14599 Points 0%
Huawei Mate X3
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11041 Points -25%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11022 Points -25%
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10893 Points -26%
Google Pixel Fold
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6849 Points -53%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6120 Points
Huawei Mate X3
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6030 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5983 Points -2%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5847 Points -4%
Google Pixel Fold
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4973 Points -19%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
26316 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
24283 Points -8%
Huawei Mate X3
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
20549 Points -22%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
20220 Points -23%
Google Pixel Fold
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10577 Points -60%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
15182 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
14482 Points -5%
Huawei Mate X3
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13386 Points -12%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13077 Points -14%
Google Pixel Fold
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8459 Points -44%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Google Pixel Fold
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps -1%
Huawei Mate X3
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
89 fps -26%
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -50%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
502 fps
Huawei Mate X3
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
434 fps -14%
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
419 fps -17%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
381 fps -24%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
329 fps -34%
Google Pixel Fold
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
303 fps -40%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
111 fps -7%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
92 fps -23%
Huawei Mate X3
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
89 fps -26%
Google Pixel Fold
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
82 fps -32%
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -50%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
288 fps
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
238 fps -17%
Huawei Mate X3
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
222 fps -23%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
211 fps -27%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
164 fps -43%
Google Pixel Fold
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
90 fps -69%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
113 fps
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
74 fps -35%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
71 fps -37%
Huawei Mate X3
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
70 fps -38%
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -47%
Google Pixel Fold
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
55 fps -51%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
213 fps
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
146 fps -31%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
145 fps -32%
Huawei Mate X3
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
130 fps -39%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
111 fps -48%
Google Pixel Fold
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
79 fps -63%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
67 fps
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
55 fps -18%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
53 fps -21%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
43 fps -36%
Huawei Mate X3
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
41 fps -39%
Google Pixel Fold
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
33 fps -51%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
136 fps
Huawei Mate X3
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
103 fps -24%
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
94 fps -31%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
83 fps -39%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
80 fps -41%
Google Pixel Fold
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
49 fps -64%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
65 fps +3%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
63 fps
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
45 fps -29%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
32 fps -49%
Huawei Mate X3
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
31 fps -51%
Google Pixel Fold
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
28 fps -56%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
66 fps
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
59 fps -11%
Huawei Mate X3
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
50 fps -24%
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
41 fps -38%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
39 fps -41%
Google Pixel Fold
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
29 fps -56%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
80 fps
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
77 fps -4%
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps -26%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
51 fps -36%
Huawei Mate X3
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
51 fps -36%
Google Pixel Fold
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
35 fps -56%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
153 fps
Huawei Mate X3
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
138 fps -10%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
125 fps -18%
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps -22%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
106 fps -31%
Google Pixel Fold
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
64 fps -58%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
31 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
31 fps
Huawei Mate X3
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
23 fps -26%
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
19 fps -39%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
18 fps -42%
Google Pixel Fold
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
14 fps -55%

与合成基准测试和 GPU 测试一样，小米 Mix Fold 3 在浏览器基准测试中也证明了它是目前最快的可折叠手机之一。在测试中，我们使用了谷歌 Chrome 浏览器，而不是预装的 Silk 浏览器。

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 4 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 (Chrome 115)
188.652 Points +20%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 (Chrome 118.0.05993.111)
157.504 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (62.7 - 179.2, n=23)
133.1 Points -15%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years)
124.4 Points -21%
Honor Magic Vs (Chrome 111)
111.449 Points -29%
Google Pixel Fold (Chrome 115)
106.562 Points -32%
Huawei Mate X3 (Huawei Browser 13.0.4)
103.364 Points -34%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 (MiUI-Browser 14.7)
76.341 Points -52%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 (Chrome 118.0.05993.111)
199 runs/min
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=152, last 2 years)
143.9 runs/min -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (62.9 - 225, n=18)
141.6 runs/min -29%
Google Pixel Fold (Chrome 115)
127 runs/min -36%
Honor Magic Vs (Chome 111)
99.4 runs/min -50%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 (Chrome 115)
185 Points +1%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 (Chrome 118.0.05993.111)
183 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (28 - 183, n=22)
130.6 Points -29%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=159, last 2 years)
117.1 Points -36%
Google Pixel Fold (Chrome 115)
101 Points -45%
Huawei Mate X3 (Huawei Browser 13.0.4)
97 Points -47%
Honor Magic Vs (Chrome 111)
81 Points -56%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Points -100%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 (Chrome 118.0.05993.111)
238 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (115 - 238, n=11)
197.5 Points -17%
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)
150.2 Points -37%
Honor Magic Vs (Chrome 111)
123 Points -48%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 (Chrome 118.0.05993.111)
65418 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 (Chrome 115)
60317 Points -8%
Huawei Mate X3 (Huawei Browser 13.0.4)
50732 Points -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (19870 - 65418, n=25)
45827 Points -30%
Google Pixel Fold (Chrome 115)
43817 Points -33%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years)
38550 Points -41%
Honor Magic Vs (Chrome 111)
36606 Points -44%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 (MiUI-Browser 14.7)
29168 Points -55%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 (MiUI-Browser 14.7)
1530.8 ms * -134%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years)
1523 ms * -133%
Google Pixel Fold (Chrome 115)
1074.5 ms * -64%
Honor Magic Vs (Chrome 111)
1055.4 ms * -61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (602 - 1837, n=22)
1023 ms * -56%
Huawei Mate X3 (Huawei Browser 13.0.4)
880.8 ms * -35%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 (Chrome 115)
693.3 ms * -6%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 (Chrome 118.0.05993.111)
653.8 ms *

* ... smaller is better

凭借 UFS 4.0 存储，Mix Fold 3 实现了极高的数据吞吐量。大型应用程序的加载时间极短。应用程序的安装几乎是瞬间完成。

Xiaomi Mix Fold 3Google Pixel FoldHonor Magic VsHuawei Mate X3Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5Xiaomi Mix Fold 2Average 512 GB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-53%
-45%
-34%
-11%
-27%
-1%
-41%
Sequential Read 256KB
3572.73
1606.37
-55%
1695.2
-53%
1953.41
-45%
4384.43
23%
1882.11
-47%
3625 ?(1851 - 4512, n=36)
1%
1894 ?(226 - 4512, n=197, last 2 years)
-47%
Sequential Write 256KB
2897.27
1169.32
-60%
1296.5
-55%
1479.42
-49%
2449.23
-15%
1783.27
-38%
3001 ?(1524 - 3889, n=36)
4%
1476 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=197, last 2 years)
-49%
Random Read 4KB
389.81
219.11
-44%
270.2
-31%
261.78
-33%
459.94
18%
342.67
-12%
386 ?(250 - 480, n=36)
-1%
278 ?(22.2 - 483, n=197, last 2 years)
-29%
Random Write 4KB
506.41
238.72
-53%
300.1
-41%
466.74
-8%
161.39
-68%
446.48
-12%
467 ?(45.7 - 709, n=36)
-8%
312 ?(9.4 - 753, n=197, last 2 years)
-38%

游戏--随时准备好足够的 FPS

骁龙 8 代 2 骁龙 8 第二代处理器、12 或 16 GB 内存和 Adreno 740GPU 使 Mix Fold 3 成为一个非常强大的游戏平台。我们的《PUBG Mobile》和《Asphalt 9》测试游戏始终运行流畅，即使在最高细节级别下也是如此。遗憾的是，我们无法提供具体的帧率，因为折叠式电脑拒绝向我们的Gamebench测试工具提供相应的数值。

沥青 9
沥青 9
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile

排放 - Mix Fold 3 可能会过热

温度

Mix Fold 3 闲置时的表面温度非常低，最高为 26 °C。但在负载情况下，温度会大幅上升，最高温度为 49.4 °C。最大的发热发生在折叠手机的右侧，集中在后置摄像头模块区域。

在重负载情况下，应用程序或基准测试可能会因过热警告而中断。这种情况最初也出现在 3DMark Wild Life 压力测试中，小米手机的温度过高。不过，经过较长的冷却阶段后，两个压力测试场景都能进行到底。小米有时会损失近 30% 的性能，但表现仍然相对较好。

Max. Load
 49 °C49.4 °C39.5 °C 
 42.9 °C39.1 °C42.1 °C 
 33.4 °C34.2 °C33.9 °C 
Maximum: 49.4 °C
Average: 40.4 °C
33.7 °C41.4 °C42.9 °C
32.3 °C39.6 °C42.1 °C
30.5 °C31.4 °C31.9 °C
Maximum: 42.9 °C
Average: 36.2 °C
Power Supply (max.)  29.5 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.4 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49.4 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.9 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.5 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
72.9 %
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
70.3 % -4%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
59.9 % -18%
Google Pixel Fold
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
50.4 % -31%
Huawei Mate X3
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
40.7 % -44%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
95.2 % +19%
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
80.2 %
Honor Magic Vs
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
69.6 % -13%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
67.2 % -16%
Google Pixel Fold
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59.2 % -26%
Huawei Mate X3
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
43.9 % -45%
05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø19.5 (18.5-23.1)
Google Pixel Fold Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø7.7 (6.38-10.8)
Honor Magic Vs Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø14.1 (11.6-16.7)
Huawei Mate X3 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø11 (7.4-16.9)
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø17.2 (15.6-23.3)
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø16.3 (15.9-16.7)
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø66.5 (61.2-83.9)
Google Pixel Fold Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø26 (20-39.6)
Honor Magic Vs Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø48.5 (44.4-63.1)
Huawei Mate X3 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø44 (26.1-64.2)
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø57.3 (50.1-83.6)
小米混合折叠 3
小米混合折叠 3

发言人

小米在 Mix Fold 3 中安装了来自哈曼卡顿（Harman Kardon）的立体声扬声器，支持杜比全景声（Dolby Atmos）。由于这两个扬声器分别位于外部显示屏的上方和下方，因此当你展开折叠式手机时，声音会从左侧传来一些 "冲击力"。以智能手机的标准来看，这两个扬声器并不差，但我们还是对它们印象不深，因为它们发出的声音比较单薄，高音偏重。

音频设备可通过蓝牙 5.3 和 USB-C 与折叠式手机连接。Mix Fold 3 支持几乎所有重要的蓝牙编解码器，包括 AAC、SBC、LDAC、aptX、aptX HD、aptX Adaptive 和 LHDC V1 至 V5。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.444.72531.235.53125.129.84029.931.85032.131.96323.127.58023.625.910022.434.312516.840.616016.548.920013.447.325014.154.931512.953.84001359.550011.768.263011.670.680012.974100013.377.7125013.175.7160012.474.7200012.673.4250012.574.3315012.475.8400012.775.6500013.176.3630013.577800013.674.91000013.474.61250013.670.61600013.464.5SPL2587N0.671.3median 13.1median 73.4Delta1.28.630.937.222.325.323.225.625.42731.137.82026.317.82217.531.217.340.41555.215.154.816.358.113.556.713.956.113.463.813.365.311.769.61471.91475.413.377.21379.613.577.414.378.513.479.414.778.413.674.914.171.91467.314.26413.85725.888.40.771.1median 14median 69.60.710.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Mix Fold 3Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 67 瓦快速充电和无线充电

耗电量

4800 毫安时电池可通过附带的 67 瓦电源快速充电。在测试中，完全耗尽的电池只需 44 分钟就能充满 100%的电量。Mix Fold 3 支持高达 50 瓦的无线充电。

在功耗方面，小米的表现可谓好坏参半。闲置时，它非常省电，平均耗电量为 1.05 瓦。另一方面，在负载情况下，它的平均耗电量达到了惊人的 15.3 瓦，明显高于所有对比设备。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.05 / 0.14 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.86 / 1.05 / 1.07 Watt
Load midlight 15.27 / 17.78 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
4800 mAh		Google Pixel Fold
4821 mAh		Honor Magic Vs
5000 mAh		Huawei Mate X3
4800 mAh		Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
4400 mAh		Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
4500 mAh		Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-10%
-21%
-109%
27%
11%
-15%
1%
Idle Minimum *
0.86
0.86
-0%
1.3
-51%
0.81
6%
0.55
36%
0.97
-13%
1.036 ?(0.7 - 2.37, n=23)
-20%
0.883 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=161, last 2 years)
-3%
Idle Average *
1.05
1.7
-62%
1.7
-62%
4.26
-306%
0.9
14%
1.37
-30%
1.766 ?(0.8 - 7.18, n=23)
-68%
1.467 ?(0.6 - 4.36, n=161, last 2 years)
-40%
Idle Maximum *
1.07
1.8
-68%
2
-87%
4.45
-316%
1
7%
1.48
-38%
1.94 ?(1.07 - 8.22, n=23)
-81%
1.621 ?(0.83 - 4.46, n=161, last 2 years)
-51%
Load Average *
15.27
9.1
40%
7
54%
10.11
34%
9.58
37%
3.98
74%
7.22 ?(2.61 - 15.3, n=23)
53%
6.58 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=155, last 2 years)
57%
Load Maximum *
17.78
11.06
38%
10.1
43%
11.58
35%
10.74
40%
6.83
62%
10.4 ?(4.57 - 18.1, n=23)
42%
9.91 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=155, last 2 years)
44%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011121314Tooltip
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.31 (0.866-14.4)
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.08 (1.023-13.7)
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.72 (1.086-12.4)
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.773 (0.702-0.896)
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.767 (0.706-1.165)
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.012 (0.955-1.307)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910111213Tooltip
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.31 (8.17-10.8)
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.81 (6.01-13.1)
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø6.95 (6.5-7.47)
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.773 (0.702-0.896)
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.767 (0.706-1.165)
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.012 (0.955-1.307)

电池寿命

虽然 Mix Fold 3 的电池容量与前代产品相比只增加了 300 毫安时，但电池续航时间却显著增加。在 WiFi 测试中，我们将屏幕亮度设置为 150 cd/m²，小米手机的续航时间比前者长了近 6 个小时。混合折叠 2长了近 6 个小时，为 15:23 小时。在相同的测试条件下，Mix Fold 3 在连续循环播放视频时也表现出色，达到了近 23 小时。这使它成为目前最耐用的高端可折叠设备之一。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
35h 32min
WiFi Websurfing
15h 23min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
22h 51min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 30min
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
4800 mAh		Google Pixel Fold
4821 mAh		Honor Magic Vs
5000 mAh		Huawei Mate X3
4800 mAh		Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
4400 mAh		Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
4500 mAh
Battery Runtime
-23%
-18%
-48%
-17%
-39%
Reader / Idle
2132
1582
-26%
1435
-33%
H.264
1371
960
-30%
1089
-21%
WiFi v1.3
923
651
-29%
756
-18%
476
-48%
763
-17%
567
-39%
Load
270
257
-5%
271
0%

Pros

+ 超薄外壳
+ 非常精确明亮的 AMOLED 显示屏
+ WiFi 7
+ 极高性能
+ 高达 67 瓦的快速充电
+ 强大的主摄像头

Cons

- 更新供应不明确
- MIUI 14.1 仅有英文版
- 没有 LTE 频段 20
- 压力测试过热

小米混合折叠 3 的评价

评测中：小米 Mix Fold 3，测试设备由提供
评测中：小米 Mix Fold 3，测试设备由提供

小米 Mix Fold 3 是一款高端可折叠手机，其价格比许多竞争对手便宜，功能和性能却不相上下。与其前代产品 混合折叠 2，我们的候选测试机在许多方面都有所改进，尤其是它的超薄设计。得益于 骁龙 8 代 2和至少 12 GB 的内存，它的日常性能表现无可挑剔。不过，如果长时间用力过猛，这款可折叠手机可能会过热。

小米 Mix Fold 3 是一款功能非常强大的折叠机，价格也很有吸引力。不过，在提供的功能方面还存在很大差距。

除了 WiFi 7 和两块峰值亮度为四位数的 120 Hz 快速 AMOLED 显示屏等旗舰级功能外，Mix Fold 3 还以其丰富的相机设备吸引了人们的目光。配备索尼 IMX800 的 5000 万像素主摄像头和两个分别为 1000 万像素和 1200 万像素的长焦镜头，不仅能提供非常出色的图像质量，还能让智能手机摄影师在设计拍摄时拥有充分的创作自由。

小米官方仅在中国提供 Mix Fold 3。另一方面，感兴趣的买家可以通过深圳贸易公司等进口商购买到这款可折叠手机，但只能使用英文系统界面。不过，这款手机缺少 LTE 频段 20，而这一频段在德国等国家非常重要，在亚洲却不起任何作用。经常携带移动设备在农村地区旅行的人可能会遇到接收问题。

小米 Mix Fold 3 的替代产品包括小米 Mix Fold 2 或 三星Galaxy Z Fold5目前的价格水平与候选测试机相似。

价格和供应情况

小米 Mix Fold 3 的所有存储版本均可在TradingShenzhen购买，售价略低于 1700 美元。

价格截至 2023 年 11 月 7 日，可能会有变动。

Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 - 05/23/2024 v7 (old)
Manuel Masiero

Chassis
84%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 90%
Pointing Device
89%
Connectivity
53 / 70 → 76%
Weight
87%
Battery
92%
Display
93%
Games Performance
73 / 64 → 100%
Application Performance
96 / 86 → 100%
Temperature
79%
Noise
100%
Audio
83 / 90 → 92%
Camera
80%
Average
83%
87%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 小米 Mix Fold 3 评测：有外观缺陷的可折叠高端智能手机
Manuel Masiero, 2023-11- 8 (Update: 2024-08-15)